Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection: Cargo Theft Incident Report, Revision of a Currently Approved Collection, Comments Requested, 36008-36009 [2012-14597]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 36008 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices S/A reiterated that a friend had given him a couple of pills and that he was just more relaxed after taking the drug, and that he felt better after taking the drug. Significantly, at no point during the meeting did the S/A relate that he had anxiety, and denied that anyone in his family had anxiety. Registrant then stated that he was diagnosing the S/A with some sort of general anxiety problem. However, given that the S/A stated that he was getting the pills from non-medical sources, and that when asked to relate his symptoms, simply stated that the pills just made him relax and that he felt better after taking the drug, I conclude that substantial evidence supports a finding that Registrant lacked a legitimate medical purpose and violated 21 CFR 1306.04(a) when he prescribed Xanax to the first S/A.6 Likewise, when asked to relate what symptoms he wanted Registrant to help him with, the second S/A stated that he wasn’t doing badly but was doing ‘‘very good’’ and that he actually wanted to get some Xanax. When asked to explain why, the S/A explained that the drug made him feel good when he took it. Subsequently, the second S/A made clear that he had gotten Xanax off the street and that the drug had never been prescribed to him. Upon further questioning by Registrant, the second S/ A again said that the drug made him feel good and denied that he had any problem sleeping. Moreover, when asked whether taking Xanax helped him relax and do his job better, the S/A said that he did not know that he ‘‘could say that’’ and later added that the drug just made him ‘‘feel better in general.’’ Finally, after Registrant explained that the S/A’s statement suggested that taking the drug took ‘‘away some kind of a tense, some kind of anxiety feeling,’’ the S/A replied that ‘‘if we have to say that, yes we can say that,’’ but that he was ‘‘doing very good in everything.’’ Subsequently, Registrant stated that the S/A’s presentation of his reason for taking Xanax was ambiguous. However, I conclude that there was nothing ambiguous in the S/A’s presentation because he never once acknowledged being anxious, and repeatedly denied having symptoms or problems that would provide a medical justification for prescribing the drug. Indeed, whenever Registrant questioned him, the S/A response was that he took Xanax because it just made him feel better. Accordingly, I conclude that substantial evidence supports a finding 6 While I have considered the audio recordings submitted in this matter, in future cases such evidence must be accompanied by a transcript. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:05 Jun 14, 2012 Jkt 226001 that Registrant lacked a legitimate medical purpose and violated 21 CFR 1306.04(a) when he prescribed Xanax to the second S/A. Registrant’s prescribing of Xanax to the two S/As thus provides additional support for my conclusion that he has committed acts which render his registration ‘‘inconsistent with the public interest.’’ 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(4). However, as explained above, the findings of the MQAC are, by themselves, more than adequate to reach this conclusion and to support the revocation of his registration.7 Sanction Having found that Registrant lacks state authority to dispense controlled substances, and that he has committed numerous acts which render his registration inconsistent with the public interest, I conclude that the Government has made out a prima facie case for revocation. Because Registrant failed to request a hearing or to submit a written statement in lieu of a hearing, and has thus offered no evidence to rebut the Government’s prima facie case, I will order that his registration be revoked and that any pending application be denied. Order Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 823(f) and 824(a)(4), as well as 28 CFR 0.100(b), I order that DEA Certificate of Registration BC1983659, issued to Patrick K. Chau, M.D., be, and it hereby is, revoked. I further order that any pending application of Patrick K. Chau, M.D., to renew or modify his registration, be, and it hereby is, denied. This Order is effective July 16, 2012. Dated: June 5, 2012. Michele M. Leonhart, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2012–14653 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 7 It is acknowledged that there is no evidence that Registrant has been convicted of an offense falling within factor three. However, this is not dispositive of the public interest inquiry. See MacKay, 664 F.3d at 817–18 (quoting Dewey C. MacKay, 75 FR 49956, 49973 (2010)). I also deem it unnecessary to make any findings under factor five. PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation [OMB Number 1110–0048] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection: Cargo Theft Incident Report, Revision of a Currently Approved Collection, Comments Requested 30-Day notice of information collection under review. ACTION: The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS) will be submitting the following Information Collection Request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the established review procedures of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Number 72, Volume 77, on page 22348, on April 12, 2012, allowing for a 60 day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until July 16, 2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to Mr. Gregory E. Scarbro, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E– 3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 625–3566. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Comments should address one or more of the following four points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM 15JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques of other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved collection. (2) The title of the form/collection: Cargo Theft Incident Report. (3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the department sponsoring the collection: Form Number: None. Sponsor: Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: City, county, state, federal, and tribal law enforcement agencies. Brief Abstract: This collection is needed to collect information on cargo theft incidents committed throughout the United States. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: There are approximately 18,108 law enforcement agency respondents that submit monthly for a total of 217,296 responses with an estimated response time of 5 minutes per response. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with this collection: There are approximately 18,108 hours, annual burden, associated with this information collection. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, United States Department of Justice, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 2E–508, Washington, DC 20530. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2012–14597 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–02–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:05 Jun 14, 2012 Jkt 226001 permitting electronic submission of responses. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OMB Number 1121–0115] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; Victims of Crime Act, Crime Victim Assistance Grant Program, State Performance Report ACTION: 60-Day Notice. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until August 14, 2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact DeLano Foster 202–616– 3612, Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 810 7th Street NW., Washington, DC 20531. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36009 Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Victims of Crime Act, Victim Assistance Grant Program, State Performance Report. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form number: 1121–0115. Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: State government. Other: None. The VOCA, Crime Victim Assistance Grant Program, State Performance Report is a required annual submission by state grantees to report to the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) on the uses and effects VOCA victim assistance grant funds have had on services to crime victims in the State, to certify compliance with the eligibility requirement of VOCA, and to provide a summary of supported activities carried out within the State during the grant period. This information will be aggregated and serve as supporting documentation for the Director’s biennial report to the President and to the Congress on the effectiveness of the activities supported by these grants. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: The information to compile these reports will be drawn from victim assistance program data to the 56 respondents (grantees). The number of victim assistance programs varies widely from state to state. A state could be responsible for compiling subgrant data for as many as 436 programs (California) to as few as 12 programs (District of Columbia). Therefore, the estimated clerical hours can range from 1 to 70 hours. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The current estimated burden is 1,176 (20 hours per respondent (estimate median) + 1 hour per respondent for recordkeeping × 56 respondents = 1,176 hours). There is a decrease in the annual recordkeeping and reporting burden. This decrease is a result of a change in the number of respondents reporting. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM 15JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36008-36009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Bureau of Investigation

[OMB Number 1110-0048]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection: 
Cargo Theft Incident Report, Revision of a Currently Approved 
Collection, Comments Requested

ACTION: 30-Day notice of information collection under review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 
Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS) will be 
submitting the following Information Collection Request to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance 
with the established review procedures of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed 
information collection was previously published in the Federal Register 
Number 72, Volume 77, on page 22348, on April 12, 2012, allowing for a 
60 day comment period.
    The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days 
for public comment until July 16, 2012. This process is conducted in 
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
    Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained 
in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated 
response time, should be directed to Mr. Gregory E. Scarbro, Unit 
Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E-3, 1000 
Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 
625-3566.
    Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected 
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are 
encouraged. Comments should address one or more of the following four 
points:
    (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of 
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and
    (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who

[[Page 36009]]

are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques of 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.

Overview of This Information Collection

    (1) Type of information collection: Revision of a currently 
approved collection.
    (2) The title of the form/collection: Cargo Theft Incident Report.
    (3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of 
the department sponsoring the collection: Form Number: None.
    Sponsor: Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal 
Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice.
    (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as 
well as a brief abstract: Primary: City, county, state, federal, and 
tribal law enforcement agencies. Brief Abstract: This collection is 
needed to collect information on cargo theft incidents committed 
throughout the United States.
    (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount 
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: There are 
approximately 18,108 law enforcement agency respondents that submit 
monthly for a total of 217,296 responses with an estimated response 
time of 5 minutes per response.
    (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with this collection: There are approximately 18,108 hours, annual 
burden, associated with this information collection.
    If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, 
Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice 
Management Division, United States Department of Justice, Two 
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 2E-508, Washington, DC 
20530.

Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012-14597 Filed 6-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-P