Special Local Regulation for Marine Events, Chesapeake Bay Workboat Race, Back River, Messick Point; Poquoson, VA, 35266-35268 [2012-14379]
Download as PDF
35266
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
13. Mental Disorders (12.00 and 112.00):
January 2, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–14407 Filed 6–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0169]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation for Marine
Events, Chesapeake Bay Workboat
Race, Back River, Messick Point;
Poquoson, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will
establish a special local regulation
during the Chesapeake Bay Workboat
Race, a series of boat races to be held on
the waters of Back River, Poquoson,
Virginia. Because this event will consist
of approximately 75 powerboats
conducting high-speed competitive
races on the waters of Back River, this
regulation is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic in
portions of the Back River, Messick
Point, Poquoson, Virginia during the
event.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 11
a.m. until 5 p.m. on June 24, 2012, with
a rain date of July 8, 2012 from 11 a.m.
until 5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2012–0169]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LCDR Hector Cintron, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector
Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone
757–668–5581, email
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:20 Jun 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 2, 2012, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Special Local Regulation for
Marine Events, Chesapeake Bay
Workboat Race, Back River, Messick
Point, Poquoson, Virginia in the Federal
Register (76 FR 093). We received 02
comments on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect life, property and
the environment during the workboat
race event; therefore, a 30-day notice is
impracticable. Delaying the effective
date would be contrary to the safety
zone’s intended objectives of protecting
persons and vessels involved in the
event, and enhancing public and
maritime safety.
Background and Purpose
On June 24, 2012, the Chesapeake Bay
Workboat Race Committee will sponsor
the ‘‘2012 Chesapeake Bay Workboat
Races’’ on the waters of Back River. The
event will consist of approximately 75
powerboats conducting high-speed
competitive races on the waters of Back
River, Messick Point, Poquoson, VA. A
fleet of spectator vessels is expected to
gather near the event site to view the
competition. To provide for the safety of
participants, spectators, support and
transiting vessels, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
event area during the races to provide
for the safety of participants, spectators
and other transiting vessels.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did receive 02
comment in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published
in the Federal Register. No public
meeting was requested and none was
held. What follows is a review of, and
the Coast Guard’s response to, the issue
that was presented by the commenter
concerning the proposed regulations.
The commenter, Annette D. Firth of
Chesapeake Boat Workboat Race
Committee, who is the event organizer,
stated that they the committee would
like to add a rain date to the regulation
to provide for inclement weather. Rain
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
date was added for July 8, 2012. A
second comment was unrelated to
regulation. Accordingly, the Coast
Guard is establishing a special local
regulation on specified waters on the
Back River, Poquoson, Virginia and we
feel that adding a rain date to the
effective period described in the
proposed rule as suggested by the
commenter will not adversely affect
waterway users in this portion of the
Back River on July 8, 2012.
Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary special local regulation on
specified waters of the Back River,
Messick Point in Poquoson, Virginia.
The regulated area will be established in
the interest of public safety during the
‘‘Chesapeake Bay Workboat Race’’, and
will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on June 24, 2012, with a rain date of
July 8, 2012 from 11 a.m. until 5 p.m.
The Coast Guard, at its discretion, when
practical, will allow the passage of
vessels when races are not taking place.
Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his Representative, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the regulated
area.
This regulation will establish an
enforcement location to include all
waters of the Back River, Poquoson,
Virginia, bounded to the north by a line
drawn along latitude 37°06′30″ N,
bounded to the south by a line drawn
along latitude 37°16′15″ N, bounded to
the east by a line drawn along longitude
076°18′52″ W and bounded on the west
by a line drawn along longitude
076°19′30″ W.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
Although this rule prevents traffic from
transiting a portion of certain waterways
during specified times, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to
E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM
13JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
the limited duration that the regulated
area will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made
to the maritime community via marine
information broadcasts, local radio
stations and area newspapers so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Impact Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard received no comments from the
Small Business Administration on this
rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit this section
of the Back River from 11 a.m. until 5
p.m. on June 24, 2012, with a rain date
of July 8, 2012 from 11 a.m. until 5 p.m.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, for only 6 hours. Vessel
traffic could pass safely around the
safety zone. Before the activation of the
zone, we would issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of
the river.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR Hector
Cintron. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
12:20 Jun 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction.
This rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR Part 100 that
apply to organized marine events on the
navigable waters of the United States
that may have potential for negative
impact on the safety or other interest of
waterway users and shore side activities
in the event area. The category of water
activities includes but is not limited to
sail boat regattas, boat parades, power
boat racing, swimming events, crew
racing, and sail board racing.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary section, § 100.35–
T05–0169 to read as follows:
■
Energy Effects
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
35267
Sfmt 4700
§ 100.35T05–0169 Special Local
Regulations; Marine Events; Back River,
Poquoson, VA.
(a) Regulated area. The following
location is a regulated area: Includes all
waters of the Back River, Poquoson,
Virginia, bounded to the north by a line
E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM
13JNR1
35268
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
drawn along latitude 37°06′30″ N,
bounded to the south by a line drawn
along latitude 37°16′15″ N, bounded to
the east by a line drawn along longitude
076°18′52″ W and bounded on the west
by a line drawn along longitude
076°19′30″ W. All coordinates reference
Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U. S.
Coast Guard who has been designated
by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The
Coast Guard Patrol Commander may
forbid and control the movement of all
vessels and persons in the regulated
area. When hailed or signaled by an
official patrol vessel, a vessel or person
in the regulated area shall immediately
comply with the directions given.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion
from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
(2) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this regulated area can be contacted at
telephone number 757–668–5555 or on
marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz).
(3) The Coast Guard will publish a
notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District
Local Notice to Mariners and issue a
marine information broadcast on VHF–
FM marine band radio announcing
specific event date and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section
will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on June 24, 3012, with a rain date of
July 8, 2012 from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Dated: May 31, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012–14379 Filed 6–12–12; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:20 Jun 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 151
46 CFR Part 162
[Docket No. USCG–2001–10486]
RIN 1625–AA32
Standards for Living Organisms in
Ships’ Ballast Water Discharged in
U.S. Waters
Coast Guard, DHS.
Rule; announcement of effective
AGENCY:
ACTION:
date.
On March 23, 2012, the Coast
Guard published in the Federal Register
a Final Rule entitled ‘‘Standards for
Living Organisms in Ships’ Ballast
Water Discharged in U.S. Waters’’. The
rulemaking triggered new information
collection requirements affecting vessel
owners and their potential requests for
an extension of the compliance date if
they cannot practicably comply with the
compliance date otherwise applicable to
their vessels. This document announces
that the request to revise the existing
collection of information to add the new
request for an extension provision has
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
may now be enforced. The OMB control
number is 1625–0069.
DATES: 33 CFR 151.1513 and 151.2036
will be effective beginning June 21,
2012.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If
you have questions about this
document, call or email Mr. John
Morris, Project Manager, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 202–372–1402, email
environmental_standards@uscg.mil. If
you have questions about viewing the
docket (USCG–2001–10486), call Ms.
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard established a standard for the
allowable concentration of living
organisms in ships’ ballast water
discharged in waters of the United
States (77 FR 17254). The Coast Guard
also established an approval process for
ballast water management systems (77
FR 17254). These new regulations will
aid in controlling the introduction and
spread of nonindigenous species from
ships’ ballast water in waters of the
United States. With the exception of this
collection of information, the final rule
becomes effective on June 21, 2012. In
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the final rule, the Coast Guard included
a provision to allow vessel owners and
operators to request an extension of
their compliance date if they cannot
practicably comply with the compliance
date otherwise applicable to their
vessels. This extension provision will
give flexibility to vessel owners and
operators to comply with the final rule.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), an
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information until the
collection is approved by OMB.
Accordingly, the preamble to the final
rule stated that the Coast Guard would
not enforce the collection of information
requirements occurring under 33 CFR
151.1513 and 151.2036 until the
collection of information request was
approved by OMB, and also stated that
the Coast Guard would publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing that
OMB approved and assigned a control
number for the requirement.
The Coast Guard submitted the
information collection request to OMB
for approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. On
May 10, 2012, OMB approved the
revision to the existing collection of
information, OMB Control Number
1625–0069, entitled ‘‘Ballast Water
Management for Vessels with Ballast
Tanks Entering U.S. Waters.’’ The
approval for this collection of
information expires on May 31, 2015.
Dated: June 6, 2012.
F.J. Sturm,
Acting Director of Commercial Regulations
and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2012–14382 Filed 6–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0473]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Fireworks Display, Lake
Superior; Cornucopia, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Coast Guard Marine Safety
Unit Duluth is establishing a temporary
safety zone in the Siskiwit Bay area of
Cornucopia, WI to help protect
participants and spectators from a
fireworks display taking place on June
30, 2012.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM
13JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35266-35268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14379]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0169]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation for Marine Events, Chesapeake Bay
Workboat Race, Back River, Messick Point; Poquoson, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will establish a special local regulation
during the Chesapeake Bay Workboat Race, a series of boat races to be
held on the waters of Back River, Poquoson, Virginia. Because this
event will consist of approximately 75 powerboats conducting high-speed
competitive races on the waters of Back River, this regulation is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
the event. This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic in
portions of the Back River, Messick Point, Poquoson, Virginia during
the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11 a.m. until 5 p.m. on June 24,
2012, with a rain date of July 8, 2012 from 11 a.m. until 5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2012-0169]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LCDR Hector Cintron, Waterways Management Division Chief,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-5581, email
Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 2, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Special Local Regulation for Marine Events, Chesapeake
Bay Workboat Race, Back River, Messick Point, Poquoson, Virginia in the
Federal Register (76 FR 093). We received 02 comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life,
property and the environment during the workboat race event; therefore,
a 30-day notice is impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the safety zone's intended objectives of protecting persons
and vessels involved in the event, and enhancing public and maritime
safety.
Background and Purpose
On June 24, 2012, the Chesapeake Bay Workboat Race Committee will
sponsor the ``2012 Chesapeake Bay Workboat Races'' on the waters of
Back River. The event will consist of approximately 75 powerboats
conducting high-speed competitive races on the waters of Back River,
Messick Point, Poquoson, VA. A fleet of spectator vessels is expected
to gather near the event site to view the competition. To provide for
the safety of participants, spectators, support and transiting vessels,
the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the event
area during the races to provide for the safety of participants,
spectators and other transiting vessels.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did receive 02 comment in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register. No public
meeting was requested and none was held. What follows is a review of,
and the Coast Guard's response to, the issue that was presented by the
commenter concerning the proposed regulations.
The commenter, Annette D. Firth of Chesapeake Boat Workboat Race
Committee, who is the event organizer, stated that they the committee
would like to add a rain date to the regulation to provide for
inclement weather. Rain date was added for July 8, 2012. A second
comment was unrelated to regulation. Accordingly, the Coast Guard is
establishing a special local regulation on specified waters on the Back
River, Poquoson, Virginia and we feel that adding a rain date to the
effective period described in the proposed rule as suggested by the
commenter will not adversely affect waterway users in this portion of
the Back River on July 8, 2012.
Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation on specified waters of the Back River, Messick Point in
Poquoson, Virginia. The regulated area will be established in the
interest of public safety during the ``Chesapeake Bay Workboat Race'',
and will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. on June 24, 2012, with a
rain date of July 8, 2012 from 11 a.m. until 5 p.m. The Coast Guard, at
its discretion, when practical, will allow the passage of vessels when
races are not taking place. Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his Representative, no person
or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area.
This regulation will establish an enforcement location to include
all waters of the Back River, Poquoson, Virginia, bounded to the north
by a line drawn along latitude 37[deg]06'30'' N, bounded to the south
by a line drawn along latitude 37[deg]16'15'' N, bounded to the east by
a line drawn along longitude 076[deg]18'52'' W and bounded on the west
by a line drawn along longitude 076[deg]19'30'' W.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Although this rule prevents
traffic from transiting a portion of certain waterways during specified
times, the effect of this regulation will not be significant due to
[[Page 35267]]
the limited duration that the regulated area will be in effect and the
extensive advance notifications that will be made to the maritime
community via marine information broadcasts, local radio stations and
area newspapers so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Impact Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
received no comments from the Small Business Administration on this
rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit this section of the Back River from 11 a.m. until
5 p.m. on June 24, 2012, with a rain date of July 8, 2012 from 11 a.m.
until 5 p.m.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for
only 6 hours. Vessel traffic could pass safely around the safety zone.
Before the activation of the zone, we would issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the river.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LCDR Hector Cintron. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded,
under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule
involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR Part 100 that
apply to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United
States that may have potential for negative impact on the safety or
other interest of waterway users and shore side activities in the event
area. The category of water activities includes but is not limited to
sail boat regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events,
crew racing, and sail board racing.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add a temporary section, Sec. 100.35-T05-0169 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35T05-0169 Special Local Regulations; Marine Events; Back
River, Poquoson, VA.
(a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area:
Includes all waters of the Back River, Poquoson, Virginia, bounded to
the north by a line
[[Page 35268]]
drawn along latitude 37[deg]06'30'' N, bounded to the south by a line
drawn along latitude 37[deg]16'15'' N, bounded to the east by a line
drawn along longitude 076[deg]18'52'' W and bounded on the west by a
line drawn along longitude 076[deg]19'30'' W. All coordinates reference
Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U. S. Coast Guard who
has been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol vessel, a
vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with
the directions given. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
(2) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can be
contacted at telephone number 757-668-5555 or on marine band radio VHF-
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date
and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section will be enforced from 11 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on June 24, 3012, with a rain date of July 8, 2012 from 11
a.m. to 5 p.m.
Dated: May 31, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012-14379 Filed 6-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P