Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Toshiba E-Studio Multi-Function Peripherals, 34964-34967 [2012-14214]
Download as PDF
34964
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2012 / Notices
Number of
respondents
Respondent
Number of
responses/
respondent
Average
burden/
response
Total average
annual burden
Provider/Administrator .....................................................................................
1,081
12.9
0.5
7,564
Total ..........................................................................................................
11,628
........................
........................
24,055
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by July 12, 2012 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). To
ensure timely receipt of comments, and
to avoid potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to: 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2012–14200 Filed 6–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Toshiba
E-Studio Multi-Function Peripherals
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain Toshiba e-Studio Multifunction Peripherals (MFPs), which
perform imaging, scanning, faxing, and
printing functions. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded that the
country where the last substantial
transformation takes place is Singapore.
Therefore, the country of origin of the
MFPs is Singapore for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on June 5, 2012. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:42 Jun 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination on or before
July 12, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather K. Pinnock, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch: (202) 325–
0034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on June 5, 2012,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
certain Toshiba e-Studio MFPs which
may be offered to the U.S. Government
under an undesignated government
procurement contract. This final
determination, HQ H198875, was issued
under procedures set forth at 19 CFR
part 177, subpart B, which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18).
In the final determination, CBP
concluded that, based upon the facts
presented, the country where the last
substantial transformation takes place is
Singapore. Therefore, the country of
origin of the MFPs is Singapore for
purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: June 5, 2012.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
Attachment
HQ H198875
June 5, 2012
MAR OT:RR:CTF:VS H198875 HkP
CATEGORY: Origin
David T. Ralston Jr., Esq.
Foley & Lardner LLP
3000 K Street, NW
Suite 600
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Washington, DC 20007–5109
RE: U.S. Government Procurement;
Country of Origin of Toshiba
e-Studio Multi-function
Peripherals; Substantial
Transformation
Dear Mr. Ralston:
This is in response to your letter,
dated December 30, 2011, clarified on
January 30, 2012, requesting a final
determination on behalf of Toshiba
America Business Solutions (‘‘TABS’’),
pursuant to subpart B of part 177 of the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part
177). Under these regulations, which
implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘TAA’’), as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations as to whether
an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality
for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in
U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of eight models of
Toshiba e-Studio multi-function
peripherals (‘‘MFPs’’). As a U.S.
importer, TABS is a party-at-interest
within the meaning of 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination.
FACTS:
Toshiba’s MFPs perform imaging,
scanning, faxing and printing functions.
TABS imports eight models of MFPs
from Singapore: (1) the e-Studio
3040CG; (2) the e-Studio 4540CG; (3) the
e-Studio 5540CG; (4) the e-Studio
6540CG; (5) the e-Studio 306G; (6) the
e-Studio 456G; (7) the e-Studio 656G;
and, (8) the e-Studio 856G. The model
numbers ending in ‘‘CG’’ offer full color
printing while those ending in ‘‘G’’ offer
monochrome printing only. Apart from
this, the primary distinction between
the model types is the speed at which
they print documents. The model name
incorporates the maximum page-perminute (‘‘ppm’’) output of each model.
For example, the e-Studio 3040CG
model prints a maximum of 30 ppm,
and the e-Studio 856G model prints a
maximum of 85 ppm. Each MFP model
is primarily composed of the same
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2012 / Notices
major components and assemblies, and
is manufactured using essentially the
same processes performed in the same
locations.
An MFP consists of the following
components:
(1) Logic Control (‘‘LGC’’) Board: a
printed circuit board (‘‘PCB’’) populated
with hundreds of micro-miniaturized
parts. It drives the laser and scaner,
exposes the photosensitive drum to
make a latent image, and otherwise
regulates the electric photography
process based on the print data received
from the System (‘‘SYS’’) Board (below);
controls the transfer of toner from the
drum to the paper while regulating
feeding of the paper, the fixing of toner
to the paper to complete the print
image, and the ejection of the paper
from the MFP; and, for photocopying,
directs the scanning of original
documents and sends the image data to
the SYS Board. The LGC Board is
manufactured in Singapore.
(2) SYS Board: a PCB populated with
hundreds of micro-miniaturized parts. It
allows the MFP to receive print data
from the intranet, a scanner, an
incoming fax, or through its copier
function, convert the data and send it to
the LGC board. It also allows the user to
interface with the MFP by detecting key
or touchscreen input and by sending
image data to the display screen and
displaying it. The SYS Board is
manufactured in Singapore.
(3) Control Panel: used to operate the
MFPs, consists of button and touchpanel switches, light emitting diodes
(‘‘LEDs’’) and a liquid crystal display
(‘‘LCD’’). It is assembled in China.
(4) Scanner: irradiates the surface of
the original document. The reflected
light is directed to a charge-coupled
device (‘‘CCD’’) board using mirrors and
lenses, where the optical image data is
converted into an electrical signal that
is transmitted to the SYS Board for
further processing. It consists of
different types of glass, an exposure
lamp, a reflector, drive pulley, sensor,
lens, CCD board, Scanner Logic Board
(‘‘SLG’’), and other components. It is
assembled in China.
(5) Laser Optical Unit: radiates a laser
beam onto the photoconductive drum in
response to the digital image signals
transmitted from the scanner, Universal
Serial Bus (‘‘USB’’) port, or network to
create a latent image. The image signal
is converted into the light emission
signal of the laser diode on the laser
driving (‘‘LDR’’) PCB, then radiated on
the drum through optical elements such
as lenses and mirrors. It is assembled in
China.
(6) Paper Feeding System: feeds paper
into the section of the MFP where the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:42 Jun 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
image is printed onto paper. It consists
of several types of rollers, several types
of sensors, and a drive system consisting
of several motors. It is assembled in
China.
(7) Electrophotograph Processing
Unit (‘‘EPU’’): allows the formation of a
latent image on the surface of the
photoconductive drum within the unit.
The EPU consists of two subassemblies,
the process unit (the drum cleaner and
developer unit) and the drive section.
There are four EPUs in each color
printer, one for each color of toner used
for color printing (yellow, magenta,
cyan, and black). It is assembled in
China.
(8) Transfer and Second Transfer
Unit. The Transfer Unit transfers the
toner image from the photoconductive
drum onto the transfer belt and the
Second Transfer Unit transfers the
image from the transfer belt to paper.
The units consist of several
components: a transfer belt unit, a
transfer belt cleaning unit, a second
transfer unit, several types of sensors,
and a motor. It is assembled in China.
(9) Fuser Unit: fuses the toner image
to paper by applying heat and pressure.
The paper is then transported to the
bridge unit or the paper exit unit. The
unit principally consists of several types
of rollers, heating lamps, thermistors,
thermostats, a heating coil, entrance
guide, paper guider, separation plate
and fingers, and a fuser belt. It is
assembled in China.
(10) Automatic Duplexing Unit
(‘‘ADU’’): reverses paper so that images
can be automatically printed on both
sides of the paper. It consists of various
types of sensors, rollers, a PCB, switch
and motor. It is assembled in China.
(11) Paper Exit Unit: transports paper
from the fuser unit or the optional
bridge unit to the exit tray or the
finisher. It consists of various types of
sensors, rollers, a switch, cooling fan
and motor. It is assembled in China.
(12) Hard-disk Drive (‘‘HDD’’): allows
the storage, encryption and protection of
data. It is designed and developed in
Japan and manufactured overseas.
Application software is developed in
Japan.
(13) Firmware: software that controls
all the functions of an MFP. System
firmware controls the SYS Board and
engine firmware controls the LGC
Board. The e-Bridge open software
platform enables the installation of
multiple devices, the performance of
initial settings, and integration with
core business applications to streamline
workflows. All MFP firmware is
developed in Japan.
(14) Image Processing (‘‘IMG’’) Board:
converts image data captured from the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34965
original document into printer image
data for output to the printer or to be
stored as a data file. The conversion
process is controlled by the SYS Board
and implemented by the LGC Board.
The IMG Board itself is not programmed
with any software. The board is only
installed in the four MFPs that print in
color—the ‘‘CG’’ models; image
processing in the monochrome MFPs is
done by the SYS Board and the LGC
Board. It is manufactured in China.
TABS describes the SYS Board and
the LGC Board (components 1 and 2
above) as the critical core components
of an MFP because they organize and
control the mechanical functions of an
MFP, and an MFP could not operate
without them. According to TABS’
submission, the SYS Board is a system
controller that unifies the MFP into a
single system and can be considered the
‘‘brains’’ of the machine. On the other
hand, the LGC Board functions as the
fine mechanical controller of the MFP,
precisely regulating the mechanical and
electrical actions of the MFP to effect
printing, scanning and other functions.
TABS analogizes the LGC Board to the
human nervous system, in that it carries
out the commands of the brain, i.e., the
SYS Board.
Manufacture of the MFPs begins in
China where all the subassemblies listed
above, except for the LGC and SYS
Boards and the HDD, are assembled.
The subassemblies are connected to
each other by a variety of wiring
harnesses and attached to the metal
frame of the MFP, which is then
encased by a plastic cover. The unit is
tested to ensure that it operates
correctly. The tests involve the
temporary installation of SYS and LGC
Boards and a HDD, which are not
shipped to Singapore with the MFPs.
After testing is complete, the MFPs are
shipped to Singapore for additional
manufacturing, programming, and
testing. The manufacturing processes in
China account for approximately 60
percent of the total time it takes to
manufacture an MFP.
In Singapore, the SYS and LGC
Boards are manufactured by populating
PCBs with hundreds of circuits and
components, after which each board is
inspected and tested for functionality
using specialized equipment. According
to TABS, the manufacture of the boards
requires more advanced production
technology than typical electric boards.
The boards are permanently installed
into the MFPs and programmed with
system firmware (SYS Board) and
engine firmware (LGC Board) developed
in Japan. The third country-origin HDD
is also permanently installed into the
MFPs. The HDD installation process
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34966
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2012 / Notices
involves creating HDD partitions,
installing Japanese-origin application
software, and performing an aging test,
and takes approximately two hours. The
MFPs are then programmed with
Japanese-origin Toshiba e-Bridge
software, after which the MFPs’ images
are tested using specialized equipment
and adjusted as necessary. TABS states
that because the post-production testing
in Singapore concerns the intricacies of
image quality and output rather than the
mechanical workings of MFP
components, it is far more complicated
and requires a higher degree of skill and
technology that the testing performed in
China. After successfully completing the
image quality and adjustment testing in
Singapore, the MFPs are packaged for
shipment.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
various models of TABS e-Studio MultiFunction Peripherals for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19
CFR § 177.21 et seq., which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et
seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the
purposes of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law
or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth
under 19 U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. § 177.22(a).
In order to determine whether a
substantial transformation occurs when
components of various origins are
assembled into completed products,
CBP considers the totality of the
circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis.
The country of origin of the item’s
components, extent of the processing
that occurs within a country, and
whether such processing renders a
product with a new name, character,
and use are primary considerations in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:42 Jun 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
such cases. Additionally, factors such as
the resources expended on product
design and development, the extent and
nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and worker skill
required during the actual
manufacturing process will be
considered when determining whether a
substantial transformation has occurred.
No one factor is determinative.
In determining whether the
combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation,
the determinative issue is the extent of
operations performed and whether the
parts lose their identity and become an
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp.
1149 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1983), aff’d, 741
F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly
operations that are minimal or simple,
as opposed to complex or meaningful,
will generally not result in a substantial
transformation. In HQ H098417, dated
June 15, 2010, dimmer and fan speed
control switches were made from
subcomponents made in Hong Kong and
shipped to Mexico for assembly. The
processing in Mexico included the
assembly of a bare printed circuit board
into a final PCB and the assembly of the
PCB with other components into the
finished product. CBP found that the
assembly in Mexico was sufficiently
complex and the components were
substantially transformed into a final
product that had a new name, character
and use, such that the country of origin
was Mexico. Likewise, in HQ H155115,
dated May 24, 2011, CBP found that
assembly in the United States of an
imported glider and imported and U.S.origin parts substantially transformed
the components into an article with a
new name, character, and use. The
assembly process in the U.S. was
complex and time-consuming and
involved a significant U.S. contribution
in both parts and labor. Consequently,
the country of origin for procurement
purposes was the United States.
In Texas Instruments v. United States,
681 F.2d 778, 782 (CCPA 1982), the
court observed that the substantial
transformation issue is a ‘‘mixed
question of technology and customs
law.’’
In Data General v. United States, 4 Ct.
Int’l Trade 182 (1982), the court
determined that for purposes of
determining eligibility under item
807.00, Tariff Schedules of the United
States (predecessor to subheading
9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States), the programming
of a foreign PROM (Programmable ReadOnly Memory chip) in the United States
substantially transformed the PROM
into a U.S. article. In programming the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
imported PROMs, the U.S. engineers
systematically caused various distinct
electronic interconnections to be formed
within each integrated circuit. The court
noted that the programs were designed
by a U.S. project engineer with many
years of experience in ‘‘designing and
building hardware.’’
TABS believes that the country of
origin for TAA purposes is Singapore
because the components and elements
that are most important to the MFPs—
the SYS Board (the ‘‘brain’’ of the MFP),
the LGC Board (the ‘‘nervous system’’
implementing the commands of the
brain), the HDD, and Toshiba
proprietary software—are incorporated
into the machines in Singapore. In
addition, the SYS Board and the LGC
Board are manufactured in Singapore. In
support of its position, TABS cites HQ
H018467 (Jan. 4, 2008).
In HQ H018467, CBP was asked to
consider two manufacturing scenarios
for multi-function printers. In one
scenario, manufacturing took place in
two countries; in the other, it took place
in three countries. In the two-country
scenario, 18 units were manufactured in
the Philippines from components
produced in various countries:
automatic document feeder unit;
scanner unit; operation panel unit; feed
unit; manual paper feed unit; lift up
motor unit; subassembly units;
automatic document transferring unit;
induction heating fuser unit; induction
heating power supply unit; transcription
unit; developing unit; laser scanning
unit; main drive unit; motor drive
board; high voltage power supply board;
low voltage power supply board; and
automatic duplex unit board. The units
were sent to Japan where the system
control board, engine control board,
OPC drum unit, and the toner reservoir
were manufactured and incorporated
into the units. The control boards were
programmed in Japan with Japanese
firmware that controlled the user
interface, imaging, memories, and the
mechanics of the machines. The
machines were then inspected and
adjusted as necessary. CBP found that
the manufacturing operations in Japan
substantially transformed the Philippine
units such that Japan was the country of
origin of the multifunctional machines.
In making our determination we took
into consideration the fact that the
system control board, the engine control
board, and the firmware, which were
very important to the functionality of
the machines, were manufactured in
Japan. We also found that the operations
performed in Japan were meaningful
and complex and resulted in an article
of commerce with a new name,
character and use.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2012 / Notices
In this case, substantial
manufacturing operations are performed
in both China and Singapore. Chinese
subassemblies are imported into
Singapore where they are fitted with
Singaporean-origin SYS Boards and
LGC Boards and programmed with
Japanese-origin system and engine
firmware. The firmware controls the
functions and mechanics of the MFPs.
The HDD, which is manufactured in a
third country, is also installed into the
MFPs in Singapore and programmed
with Japanese-origin application
software. The boards assembled in
Singapore are important to the function
of the MFPs, as is the Japanese software.
But the assembly in Singapore
completes the MFPs. Therefore, we find
that the last substantial transformation
occurs in Singapore. See HQ 563012,
dated May 4, 2004 (CBP found that
Hong Kong was the country of origin of
fabric switches assembled to completion
in Hong Kong, where they were also
configured and programmed with U.S.origin software that transformed the
switches from non-functional devices
into fabric switches capable of
performing various Storage Area
Network related functions); HQ
H170315, scenario III, dated July 28,
2011 (application and transceiver
boards for satellite phones were
assembled in Malaysia and programmed
with U.K.-origin software in Singapore,
where the phones were also assembled.
CBP found that no one country’s
operations dominated the
manufacturing operations of the phones
and that the last substantial
transformation occurred in Singapore.)
Therefore, the country of origin of the
e-Studio MFPs is Singapore.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts provided, the
country where the last substantial
transformation takes place is Singapore.
As such, the Toshiba e-Studio MFPs
described in this ruling are to be
considered products of Singapore for
purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 C.F.R. § 177.29. Any
party-at-interest other than the party
which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to
19 C.F.R. § 177.31, that CBP reexamine
the matter anew and issue a new final
determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.30, any party-at-interest may,
within 30 days of publication of the
Federal Register Notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:42 Jun 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell, Executive Director,
Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2012–14214 Filed 6–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Digital
Projectors
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain digital projectors. Based
upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded in the final determination
that the assembly and programming
operations performed in the Taiwan
substantially transform the non-TAA
country components of the digital
projectors. Therefore the country of
origin of the digital projectors is Taiwan
for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on June 4, 2012. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within July 12,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of International
Trade (202–325–0132).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on June 4, 2012,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
digital projectors which may be offered
to the United States Government under
an undesignated government
procurement contracts. This final
determination, in HQ H193929, was
issued at the request of the
manufacturer of the digital projectors
under the procedures set forth at 19 CFR
part 177, subpart B, which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18).
In the final determination, CBP
concluded that based upon the facts
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34967
presented, the assembly and
programming operations performed in
Taiwan substantially transform the nonTAA country components. Therefore,
the country of origin of the finished
digital projectors is Taiwan for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: June 6, 2012.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
Attachment
HQ H193929
MAR–2 OT:RR:CTF:VS H193929 RSD
CATEGORY: Marking
Munford Page Hall, Esq.
William C. Sjoberg, Esq.
Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg LLP
1200 Seventeenth Street, New
Washington, DC 20036
RE: Final Determination regarding the
Country of Origin of Digital
Projectors, Substantial
Transformation
Dear Mr. Hall and Mr. Sjoberg:
This is in response to your three
letters dated November 15, 2011,
November 22, 2011, and January 18,
2012, requesting final determinations on
behalf of a foreign manufacturer of five
digital projector models, pursuant to
subpart B of part 177 of the U.S.
Customs Border Protection (CBP)
Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 177). Under
these regulations which implement Title
III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(TAA), as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et
seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the
purposes of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in the U.S.
law or practice for products offered for
sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of five different
models of digital projectors. We note
that the manufacturer of the digital
projectors, a foreign manufacturer, is a
party-at-interest within the meaning the
19 C.F.R. § 177.22(d)(1), and, as such, is
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34964-34967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14214]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Toshiba E-
Studio Multi-Function Peripherals
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain Toshiba e-Studio Multi-function
Peripherals (MFPs), which perform imaging, scanning, faxing, and
printing functions. Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded
that the country where the last substantial transformation takes place
is Singapore. Therefore, the country of origin of the MFPs is Singapore
for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on June 5, 2012. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination on or before July 12, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather K. Pinnock, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch: (202) 325-0034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on June 5, 2012,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of certain Toshiba e-
Studio MFPs which may be offered to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement contract. This final determination,
HQ H198875, was issued under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177,
subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP
concluded that, based upon the facts presented, the country where the
last substantial transformation takes place is Singapore. Therefore,
the country of origin of the MFPs is Singapore for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: June 5, 2012.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
Attachment
HQ H198875
June 5, 2012
MAR OT:RR:CTF:VS H198875 HkP
CATEGORY: Origin
David T. Ralston Jr., Esq.
Foley & Lardner LLP
3000 K Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20007-5109
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Country of Origin of Toshiba e-Studio
Multi-function Peripherals; Substantial Transformation
Dear Mr. Ralston:
This is in response to your letter, dated December 30, 2011,
clarified on January 30, 2012, requesting a final determination on
behalf of Toshiba America Business Solutions (``TABS''), pursuant to
subpart B of part 177 of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 177). Under these regulations,
which implement Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(``TAA''), as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues
country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy
American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of eight
models of Toshiba e-Studio multi-function peripherals (``MFPs''). As a
U.S. importer, TABS is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19
C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final
determination.
FACTS:
Toshiba's MFPs perform imaging, scanning, faxing and printing
functions. TABS imports eight models of MFPs from Singapore: (1) the e-
Studio 3040CG; (2) the e-Studio 4540CG; (3) the e-Studio 5540CG; (4)
the e-Studio 6540CG; (5) the e-Studio 306G; (6) the e-Studio 456G; (7)
the e-Studio 656G; and, (8) the e-Studio 856G. The model numbers ending
in ``CG'' offer full color printing while those ending in ``G'' offer
monochrome printing only. Apart from this, the primary distinction
between the model types is the speed at which they print documents. The
model name incorporates the maximum page-per-minute (``ppm'') output of
each model. For example, the e-Studio 3040CG model prints a maximum of
30 ppm, and the e-Studio 856G model prints a maximum of 85 ppm. Each
MFP model is primarily composed of the same
[[Page 34965]]
major components and assemblies, and is manufactured using essentially
the same processes performed in the same locations.
An MFP consists of the following components:
(1) Logic Control (``LGC'') Board: a printed circuit board
(``PCB'') populated with hundreds of micro-miniaturized parts. It
drives the laser and scaner, exposes the photosensitive drum to make a
latent image, and otherwise regulates the electric photography process
based on the print data received from the System (``SYS'') Board
(below); controls the transfer of toner from the drum to the paper
while regulating feeding of the paper, the fixing of toner to the paper
to complete the print image, and the ejection of the paper from the
MFP; and, for photocopying, directs the scanning of original documents
and sends the image data to the SYS Board. The LGC Board is
manufactured in Singapore.
(2) SYS Board: a PCB populated with hundreds of micro-miniaturized
parts. It allows the MFP to receive print data from the intranet, a
scanner, an incoming fax, or through its copier function, convert the
data and send it to the LGC board. It also allows the user to interface
with the MFP by detecting key or touchscreen input and by sending image
data to the display screen and displaying it. The SYS Board is
manufactured in Singapore.
(3) Control Panel: used to operate the MFPs, consists of button and
touch-panel switches, light emitting diodes (``LEDs'') and a liquid
crystal display (``LCD''). It is assembled in China.
(4) Scanner: irradiates the surface of the original document. The
reflected light is directed to a charge-coupled device (``CCD'') board
using mirrors and lenses, where the optical image data is converted
into an electrical signal that is transmitted to the SYS Board for
further processing. It consists of different types of glass, an
exposure lamp, a reflector, drive pulley, sensor, lens, CCD board,
Scanner Logic Board (``SLG''), and other components. It is assembled in
China.
(5) Laser Optical Unit: radiates a laser beam onto the
photoconductive drum in response to the digital image signals
transmitted from the scanner, Universal Serial Bus (``USB'') port, or
network to create a latent image. The image signal is converted into
the light emission signal of the laser diode on the laser driving
(``LDR'') PCB, then radiated on the drum through optical elements such
as lenses and mirrors. It is assembled in China.
(6) Paper Feeding System: feeds paper into the section of the MFP
where the image is printed onto paper. It consists of several types of
rollers, several types of sensors, and a drive system consisting of
several motors. It is assembled in China.
(7) Electrophotograph Processing Unit (``EPU''): allows the
formation of a latent image on the surface of the photoconductive drum
within the unit. The EPU consists of two subassemblies, the process
unit (the drum cleaner and developer unit) and the drive section. There
are four EPUs in each color printer, one for each color of toner used
for color printing (yellow, magenta, cyan, and black). It is assembled
in China.
(8) Transfer and Second Transfer Unit. The Transfer Unit transfers
the toner image from the photoconductive drum onto the transfer belt
and the Second Transfer Unit transfers the image from the transfer belt
to paper. The units consist of several components: a transfer belt
unit, a transfer belt cleaning unit, a second transfer unit, several
types of sensors, and a motor. It is assembled in China.
(9) Fuser Unit: fuses the toner image to paper by applying heat and
pressure. The paper is then transported to the bridge unit or the paper
exit unit. The unit principally consists of several types of rollers,
heating lamps, thermistors, thermostats, a heating coil, entrance
guide, paper guider, separation plate and fingers, and a fuser belt. It
is assembled in China.
(10) Automatic Duplexing Unit (``ADU''): reverses paper so that
images can be automatically printed on both sides of the paper. It
consists of various types of sensors, rollers, a PCB, switch and motor.
It is assembled in China.
(11) Paper Exit Unit: transports paper from the fuser unit or the
optional bridge unit to the exit tray or the finisher. It consists of
various types of sensors, rollers, a switch, cooling fan and motor. It
is assembled in China.
(12) Hard-disk Drive (``HDD''): allows the storage, encryption and
protection of data. It is designed and developed in Japan and
manufactured overseas. Application software is developed in Japan.
(13) Firmware: software that controls all the functions of an MFP.
System firmware controls the SYS Board and engine firmware controls the
LGC Board. The e-Bridge open software platform enables the installation
of multiple devices, the performance of initial settings, and
integration with core business applications to streamline workflows.
All MFP firmware is developed in Japan.
(14) Image Processing (``IMG'') Board: converts image data captured
from the original document into printer image data for output to the
printer or to be stored as a data file. The conversion process is
controlled by the SYS Board and implemented by the LGC Board. The IMG
Board itself is not programmed with any software. The board is only
installed in the four MFPs that print in color--the ``CG'' models;
image processing in the monochrome MFPs is done by the SYS Board and
the LGC Board. It is manufactured in China.
TABS describes the SYS Board and the LGC Board (components 1 and 2
above) as the critical core components of an MFP because they organize
and control the mechanical functions of an MFP, and an MFP could not
operate without them. According to TABS' submission, the SYS Board is a
system controller that unifies the MFP into a single system and can be
considered the ``brains'' of the machine. On the other hand, the LGC
Board functions as the fine mechanical controller of the MFP, precisely
regulating the mechanical and electrical actions of the MFP to effect
printing, scanning and other functions. TABS analogizes the LGC Board
to the human nervous system, in that it carries out the commands of the
brain, i.e., the SYS Board.
Manufacture of the MFPs begins in China where all the subassemblies
listed above, except for the LGC and SYS Boards and the HDD, are
assembled. The subassemblies are connected to each other by a variety
of wiring harnesses and attached to the metal frame of the MFP, which
is then encased by a plastic cover. The unit is tested to ensure that
it operates correctly. The tests involve the temporary installation of
SYS and LGC Boards and a HDD, which are not shipped to Singapore with
the MFPs. After testing is complete, the MFPs are shipped to Singapore
for additional manufacturing, programming, and testing. The
manufacturing processes in China account for approximately 60 percent
of the total time it takes to manufacture an MFP.
In Singapore, the SYS and LGC Boards are manufactured by populating
PCBs with hundreds of circuits and components, after which each board
is inspected and tested for functionality using specialized equipment.
According to TABS, the manufacture of the boards requires more advanced
production technology than typical electric boards. The boards are
permanently installed into the MFPs and programmed with system firmware
(SYS Board) and engine firmware (LGC Board) developed in Japan. The
third country-origin HDD is also permanently installed into the MFPs.
The HDD installation process
[[Page 34966]]
involves creating HDD partitions, installing Japanese-origin
application software, and performing an aging test, and takes
approximately two hours. The MFPs are then programmed with Japanese-
origin Toshiba e-Bridge software, after which the MFPs' images are
tested using specialized equipment and adjusted as necessary. TABS
states that because the post-production testing in Singapore concerns
the intricacies of image quality and output rather than the mechanical
workings of MFP components, it is far more complicated and requires a
higher degree of skill and technology that the testing performed in
China. After successfully completing the image quality and adjustment
testing in Singapore, the MFPs are packaged for shipment.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the various models of TABS e-
Studio Multi-Function Peripherals for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR Sec. 177.21 et seq.,
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is
or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec.
2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i)
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(a).
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs
when components of various origins are assembled into completed
products, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes
such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of
the item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases.
Additionally, factors such as the resources expended on product design
and development, the extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and worker skill required during the actual
manufacturing process will be considered when determining whether a
substantial transformation has occurred. No one factor is
determinative.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983),
aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or meaningful, will generally
not result in a substantial transformation. In HQ H098417, dated June
15, 2010, dimmer and fan speed control switches were made from
subcomponents made in Hong Kong and shipped to Mexico for assembly. The
processing in Mexico included the assembly of a bare printed circuit
board into a final PCB and the assembly of the PCB with other
components into the finished product. CBP found that the assembly in
Mexico was sufficiently complex and the components were substantially
transformed into a final product that had a new name, character and
use, such that the country of origin was Mexico. Likewise, in HQ
H155115, dated May 24, 2011, CBP found that assembly in the United
States of an imported glider and imported and U.S.-origin parts
substantially transformed the components into an article with a new
name, character, and use. The assembly process in the U.S. was complex
and time-consuming and involved a significant U.S. contribution in both
parts and labor. Consequently, the country of origin for procurement
purposes was the United States.
In Texas Instruments v. United States, 681 F.2d 778, 782 (CCPA
1982), the court observed that the substantial transformation issue is
a ``mixed question of technology and customs law.''
In Data General v. United States, 4 Ct. Int'l Trade 182 (1982), the
court determined that for purposes of determining eligibility under
item 807.00, Tariff Schedules of the United States (predecessor to
subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States), the programming of a foreign PROM (Programmable Read-Only
Memory chip) in the United States substantially transformed the PROM
into a U.S. article. In programming the imported PROMs, the U.S.
engineers systematically caused various distinct electronic
interconnections to be formed within each integrated circuit. The court
noted that the programs were designed by a U.S. project engineer with
many years of experience in ``designing and building hardware.''
TABS believes that the country of origin for TAA purposes is
Singapore because the components and elements that are most important
to the MFPs--the SYS Board (the ``brain'' of the MFP), the LGC Board
(the ``nervous system'' implementing the commands of the brain), the
HDD, and Toshiba proprietary software--are incorporated into the
machines in Singapore. In addition, the SYS Board and the LGC Board are
manufactured in Singapore. In support of its position, TABS cites HQ
H018467 (Jan. 4, 2008).
In HQ H018467, CBP was asked to consider two manufacturing
scenarios for multi-function printers. In one scenario, manufacturing
took place in two countries; in the other, it took place in three
countries. In the two-country scenario, 18 units were manufactured in
the Philippines from components produced in various countries:
automatic document feeder unit; scanner unit; operation panel unit;
feed unit; manual paper feed unit; lift up motor unit; subassembly
units; automatic document transferring unit; induction heating fuser
unit; induction heating power supply unit; transcription unit;
developing unit; laser scanning unit; main drive unit; motor drive
board; high voltage power supply board; low voltage power supply board;
and automatic duplex unit board. The units were sent to Japan where the
system control board, engine control board, OPC drum unit, and the
toner reservoir were manufactured and incorporated into the units. The
control boards were programmed in Japan with Japanese firmware that
controlled the user interface, imaging, memories, and the mechanics of
the machines. The machines were then inspected and adjusted as
necessary. CBP found that the manufacturing operations in Japan
substantially transformed the Philippine units such that Japan was the
country of origin of the multifunctional machines. In making our
determination we took into consideration the fact that the system
control board, the engine control board, and the firmware, which were
very important to the functionality of the machines, were manufactured
in Japan. We also found that the operations performed in Japan were
meaningful and complex and resulted in an article of commerce with a
new name, character and use.
[[Page 34967]]
In this case, substantial manufacturing operations are performed in
both China and Singapore. Chinese subassemblies are imported into
Singapore where they are fitted with Singaporean-origin SYS Boards and
LGC Boards and programmed with Japanese-origin system and engine
firmware. The firmware controls the functions and mechanics of the
MFPs. The HDD, which is manufactured in a third country, is also
installed into the MFPs in Singapore and programmed with Japanese-
origin application software. The boards assembled in Singapore are
important to the function of the MFPs, as is the Japanese software. But
the assembly in Singapore completes the MFPs. Therefore, we find that
the last substantial transformation occurs in Singapore. See HQ 563012,
dated May 4, 2004 (CBP found that Hong Kong was the country of origin
of fabric switches assembled to completion in Hong Kong, where they
were also configured and programmed with U.S.-origin software that
transformed the switches from non-functional devices into fabric
switches capable of performing various Storage Area Network related
functions); HQ H170315, scenario III, dated July 28, 2011 (application
and transceiver boards for satellite phones were assembled in Malaysia
and programmed with U.K.-origin software in Singapore, where the phones
were also assembled. CBP found that no one country's operations
dominated the manufacturing operations of the phones and that the last
substantial transformation occurred in Singapore.) Therefore, the
country of origin of the e-Studio MFPs is Singapore.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts provided, the country where the last substantial
transformation takes place is Singapore. As such, the Toshiba e-Studio
MFPs described in this ruling are to be considered products of
Singapore for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days of publication
of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek judicial review
of this final determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell, Executive Director,
Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2012-14214 Filed 6-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P