Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 34870-34872 [2012-14208]
Download as PDF
34870
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2012 / Proposed Rules
such amendments to the Order as the
Board considers appropriate.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
received in response to this rule by the
date specified would be considered
prior to finalizing this action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1280
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Marketing agreements, Lamb
and Lamb products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
it is proposed that 7 CFR part 1280 be
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1280 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425.
2. § 1280.217, paragraph (e) and
§ 1280.219 are revised to read as
follows:
Lamb Purchases.
(e) Rate. Except as otherwise
provided, the rate of assessment shall be
seven-tenths of a cent ($.007 per pound)
per pound on all live lambs sold. The
rate of assessment may be raised or
lowered no more than twentyhundredths of a cent ($.002) in any one
year. The Board may recommend any
change to the Department. Prior to a
change in the assessment rate, the
Department will provide notice by
publishing in the Federal Register any
proposed changes with interested
parties allowed to provide comment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1280.219
First Handlers.
Each first handler, in addition to
remitting the assessment collected
pursuant to § 1280.217, shall pay an
assessment equal to forty-two cents
($.42) per head of lambs purchased by
the first handler for slaughter or
slaughtered by such first handler
pursuant to a custom slaughter
arrangement. The rates of assessment for
first handlers shall be increased or
decreased proportionately. If the
assessment paid by producers,
seedstock producers, and feeders is
increased or decreased. Such
assessment shall be remitted with the
assessments collected pursuant to
§ 1280.217.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:55 Jun 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
[FR Doc. 2012–14187 Filed 6–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0592; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–253–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
PART 1280—LAMB PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, and INFORMATION
§ 1280.217
Dated: June 6, 2012.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The existing
AD currently requires a one-time
inspection of the shafts of the main
landing gear (MLG) side-brace fittings to
detect corrosion, and the forward and
aft bushings in the left-hand and righthand MLG side-brace fittings to detect
discrepancies. The existing AD also
requires corrective and related actions if
necessary. Since we issued that AD, we
have received reports that the side brace
fitting shafts of the MLG continue to
fail. This proposed AD would require
repetitive detailed inspections for
corrosion and damage of the MLG sidebrace fitting and replacing the sidebrace fitting shaft with the re-designed
side-brace fitting shaft of the MLG if
necessary. This AD would also require
eventual replacement of certain sidebrace fitting shafts with the re-designed
part. Replacement with a re-designed
side-brace fitting shaft of the MLG is
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. We are proposing this AD
to prevent fractures of the side-brace
fitting shafts of the MLG, and possible
collapse of the MLG.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Zimmer, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7306; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2012–0592; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–253–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2012 / Proposed Rules
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On October 20, 2004, we issued AD
2004–22–23, Amendment 39–13851 (69
FR 64856, November 9, 2004). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2004–22–23,
Amendment 39–13851 (69 FR 64856,
November 9, 2004), we received reports
that the side-brace fitting shaft of the
MLG continued to fail which meant the
existing AD did not adequately address
the unsafe condition. Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the
aviation authority for Canada, has
issued Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2011–39, dated October
25, 2011 (referred to after this as ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Due to the failure of the main landing gear
(MLG) side brace fitting shaft, caused by
corrosion, [TCCA] Airworthiness Directive
(AD) CF–2002–41 was issued to require
inspection and if needed, parts replacement.
However, the existing MLG side-brace fitting
shafts continued to fail. Failure of the MLG
side brace fitting shaft could result in the
collapse of the main landing gear.
This [TCCA] directive mandates the
repetitive detailed visual inspection [for
cracking and corrosion] of the MLG side
brace fitting and the incorporation of the redesigned MLG side brace fitting shaft part
number (P/N) 605R10247–3 as the
terminating action.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Service
Bulletin 601R–57–052, dated July 28,
2011. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jun 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 584 products of U.S.
registry. We estimate that it would take
about 10 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Required parts would cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these parts. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$496,400, or $850 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 14 work-hours and require parts
costing $3,860, for a cost of $5,050 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34871
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2004–22–23, Amendment 39–13851 (69
FR 64856, November 9, 2004), and
adding the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2012–
0592; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–
253–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 27,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2004–22–23,
Amendment 39–13851 (69 FR 64856,
November 9, 2004).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model
CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes; certificated in any category; serial
numbers 7003 through 7990 inclusive, and
8000 through 8999 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of failure
of the side brace fitting shaft of the main
landing gear (MLG), due to corrosion. We are
issuing this AD to prevent fractures of the
side-brace fitting shafts of the MLG, and
possible collapse of the MLG.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
34872
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2012 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Inspection of Main Landing Gear SideBrace Fitting Shaft and Replacement
(1) At the applicable times specified in
paragraphs (g)(1)(i), (g)(1)(ii), (g)(1)(iii), and
(g)(1)(iv) of this AD, do a detailed inspection
for corrosion and damage of each side-brace
fitting shaft of the MLG, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–57–052,
dated July 28, 2011. Repeat the inspections
at the applicable times specified in
paragraphs (g)(1)(i), (g)(1)(ii), (g)(1)(iii), and
(g)(1)(iv) of this AD.
(i) For airplanes that average greater than
900 flight hours per year and have side-brace
shafts part number (P/N) 601R10237–1
installed in either the left- or right-hand
MLG, or if the side brace shaft part number
cannot be identified without removal: Within
1,000 flight hours after the effective date of
this AD, do the inspection. Repeat the
inspections thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 1,000 flight hours until the
replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) or
(h) of this AD is done.
(ii) For airplanes that average 900 flight
hours or less per year and have side-brace
shafts P/N 601R10237–1 installed on either
the left- or right-hand MLG, or if the side
brace shaft part number cannot be identified
without removal: Within 18 months after the
effective date of this AD, do the inspection.
Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 18 months until the
replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) or
(h) of this AD is done.
(iii) For airplanes that average greater than
900 flight hours per year and have side-brace
shafts P/N 601R10237–3 installed on either
the left- or right-hand MLG: Within 36
months after the effective date of this AD, do
the inspection. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 36
months until the replacement specified in
paragraph (g)(2) or (h) of this AD is done.
(iv) For airplanes that average 900 flight
hours or less per year and have side brace
shafts P/N 601R10237–3 installed on either
the left- or right-hand MLG: Within 60
months after the effective date of this AD, do
the inspection. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 60
months until the replacement specified in
paragraph (g)(2) or (h) of this AD is done.
(2) If any corrosion or damage is found
during any inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD: Before further flight, replace
the side-brace fitting shaft with a new shaft
P/N 601R10247–3, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601R–57–052, dated July 28,
2011. Doing this replacement terminates the
inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of
this AD.
(h) Replacement
Do the replacement at the applicable time
in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD.
(1) For any airplanes that have side-brace
shafts P/N 601R10237–1 installed or if the
side-brace shaft part number cannot be
identified without removal: Within 27
months after the effective date of this AD,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jun 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
replace the side-brace fitting shaft of the MLG
with a new shaft having P/N 601R10247–3,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
601R–57–052, dated July 28, 2011. Doing this
replacement terminates the inspection
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) For airplanes that have side-brace shafts
P/N 601R10237–3 installed: Within 117
months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the side-brace fitting shaft of the MLG
with a new shaft P/N 601R10247–3, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
601R–57–052, dated July 28, 2011. Doing this
replacement terminates the inspection
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
SUMMARY:
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(j) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2011–39, dated October 25,
2011; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–
57–052, dated July 28, 2011; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31,
2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–14208 Filed 6–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0593; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–238–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Services B.V. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark
0070 and 0100 airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by reports of burned
contacts in a certain production break
plug and its corresponding receptacle.
This proposed AD would require
modifying galley power supply wiring
by disconnecting it from the affected
plug/receptacle and reconnecting the
power supply wiring through splices.
We are proposing this AD to prevent a
high electrical load which may lead to
overheating of the galley power supply
wiring and/or the electrical connector
and consequent smoke or fire in the
galley area, which could result in
damage to the airplane and injury to
occupants.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Fokker
Services B.V., Technical Services Dept.,
P.O. Box 231, 2150 AE Nieuw-Vennep,
the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)252–
627–350; fax +31 (0)252–627–211;
email: technicalservices.fokkerservices@
stork.com; Internet https://
www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34870-34872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14208]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0592; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-253-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The existing AD currently
requires a one-time inspection of the shafts of the main landing gear
(MLG) side-brace fittings to detect corrosion, and the forward and aft
bushings in the left-hand and right-hand MLG side-brace fittings to
detect discrepancies. The existing AD also requires corrective and
related actions if necessary. Since we issued that AD, we have received
reports that the side brace fitting shafts of the MLG continue to fail.
This proposed AD would require repetitive detailed inspections for
corrosion and damage of the MLG side-brace fitting and replacing the
side-brace fitting shaft with the re-designed side-brace fitting shaft
of the MLG if necessary. This AD would also require eventual
replacement of certain side-brace fitting shafts with the re-designed
part. Replacement with a re-designed side-brace fitting shaft of the
MLG is terminating action for the repetitive inspections. We are
proposing this AD to prevent fractures of the side-brace fitting shafts
of the MLG, and possible collapse of the MLG.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Zimmer, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7306; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0592;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-253-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
[[Page 34871]]
substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On October 20, 2004, we issued AD 2004-22-23, Amendment 39-13851
(69 FR 64856, November 9, 2004). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2004-22-23, Amendment 39-13851 (69 FR 64856,
November 9, 2004), we received reports that the side-brace fitting
shaft of the MLG continued to fail which meant the existing AD did not
adequately address the unsafe condition. Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued
Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-39, dated October 25, 2011
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
Due to the failure of the main landing gear (MLG) side brace fitting
shaft, caused by corrosion, [TCCA] Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF-
2002-41 was issued to require inspection and if needed, parts
replacement. However, the existing MLG side-brace fitting shafts
continued to fail. Failure of the MLG side brace fitting shaft could
result in the collapse of the main landing gear.
This [TCCA] directive mandates the repetitive detailed visual
inspection [for cracking and corrosion] of the MLG side brace
fitting and the incorporation of the re-designed MLG side brace
fitting shaft part number (P/N) 605R10247-3 as the terminating
action.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 601R-57-052, dated July 28,
2011. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 584 products of U.S. registry. We estimate that it
would take about 10 work-hours per product to comply with the new basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these parts.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $496,400, or $850 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 14 work-hours and require parts costing $3,860, for a cost
of $5,050 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive
(AD) 2004-22-23, Amendment 39-13851 (69 FR 64856, November 9, 2004),
and adding the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2012-0592; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-253-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 27, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2004-22-23, Amendment 39-13851 (69 FR
64856, November 9, 2004).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes; certificated in any category;
serial numbers 7003 through 7990 inclusive, and 8000 through 8999
inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of failure of the side brace
fitting shaft of the main landing gear (MLG), due to corrosion. We
are issuing this AD to prevent fractures of the side-brace fitting
shafts of the MLG, and possible collapse of the MLG.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the
[[Page 34872]]
compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been
done.
(g) Inspection of Main Landing Gear Side-Brace Fitting Shaft and
Replacement
(1) At the applicable times specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i),
(g)(1)(ii), (g)(1)(iii), and (g)(1)(iv) of this AD, do a detailed
inspection for corrosion and damage of each side-brace fitting shaft
of the MLG, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-57-052, dated July 28, 2011. Repeat
the inspections at the applicable times specified in paragraphs
(g)(1)(i), (g)(1)(ii), (g)(1)(iii), and (g)(1)(iv) of this AD.
(i) For airplanes that average greater than 900 flight hours per
year and have side-brace shafts part number (P/N) 601R10237-1
installed in either the left- or right-hand MLG, or if the side
brace shaft part number cannot be identified without removal: Within
1,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, do the
inspection. Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 1,000 flight hours until the replacement specified in
paragraph (g)(2) or (h) of this AD is done.
(ii) For airplanes that average 900 flight hours or less per
year and have side-brace shafts P/N 601R10237-1 installed on either
the left- or right-hand MLG, or if the side brace shaft part number
cannot be identified without removal: Within 18 months after the
effective date of this AD, do the inspection. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 18 months until the
replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) or (h) of this AD is done.
(iii) For airplanes that average greater than 900 flight hours
per year and have side-brace shafts P/N 601R10237-3 installed on
either the left- or right-hand MLG: Within 36 months after the
effective date of this AD, do the inspection. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 36 months until the
replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) or (h) of this AD is done.
(iv) For airplanes that average 900 flight hours or less per
year and have side brace shafts P/N 601R10237-3 installed on either
the left- or right-hand MLG: Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, do the inspection. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 60 months until the
replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) or (h) of this AD is done.
(2) If any corrosion or damage is found during any inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, replace
the side-brace fitting shaft with a new shaft P/N 601R10247-3, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601R-57-052, dated July 28, 2011. Doing this
replacement terminates the inspection requirements of paragraph (g)
of this AD.
(h) Replacement
Do the replacement at the applicable time in paragraph (h)(1) or
(h)(2) of this AD.
(1) For any airplanes that have side-brace shafts P/N 601R10237-
1 installed or if the side-brace shaft part number cannot be
identified without removal: Within 27 months after the effective
date of this AD, replace the side-brace fitting shaft of the MLG
with a new shaft having P/N 601R10247-3, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-57-
052, dated July 28, 2011. Doing this replacement terminates the
inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) For airplanes that have side-brace shafts P/N 601R10237-3
installed: Within 117 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the side-brace fitting shaft of the MLG with a new shaft P/N
601R10247-3, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-57-052, dated July 28, 2011. Doing
this replacement terminates the inspection requirements of paragraph
(g) of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(j) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-39, dated
October 25, 2011; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-57-052, dated
July 28, 2011; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-14208 Filed 6-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P