Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Revision to Allegheny County Regulations for Prevention of Significant Deterioration, 34300-34301 [2012-14138]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
34300
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Particulate matter,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Jun 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 17, 2012.
W.C. Early
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012–14094 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0378; FRL–9685–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Revision to Allegheny
County Regulations for Prevention of
Significant Deterioration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection
(PADEP). This revision pertains to the
Air Pollution Control portion of the
Allegheny County Health Department
(ACHD) Rules and Regulations, relating
to ACHD’s Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program.
Additionally, EPA is proposing to make
a determination that the proposed SIP
revision will satisfy the Clean Air Act
(CAA) infrastructure requirements
relating to PSD for the 1997 ozone and
particulate matter less than 2.5
micrometers (PM2.5) National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. This Action is
being taken under the section 110(k) of
the CAA.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2012–0378 by one of the
following methods.
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: Cox.Kathleen@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0378,
Kathleen Cox, Associate Director, Office
of Permits and Air Toxics, Mailcode
3AP10, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012–
0378. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality
Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105;
and Allegheny County Health
Department, Bureau of Environmental
Quality, Division of Air Quality, 301
E:\FR\FM\11JNP1.SGM
11JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
39th Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15201.
Paul
T. Wentworth, P.E. at: (215) 814–2183,
or by email at wentworth.paul@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. On July 1, 2008, PADEP submitted
a revision to its SIP on behalf ACHD.
The SIP submittal consists of changes to
the ACHD Rules and Regulations,
Article XXI, Air Pollution Control,
relating to ACHD’s PSD program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
On December 14, 1983, EPA delegated
authority to ACHD to implement and
enforce the provisions of Title 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 40
CFR 52.21 on behalf of EPA (see 48 FR
55625, December 14, 1983).
On February 13, 2003, ACHD
requested EPA to update and affirm the
existing delegation of authority
agreement between Allegheny County
and EPA based on the representations
included in Allegheny County’s
February 13, 2003 letter to EPA (see 68
FR 14617). On March 18, 2003, EPA
formally notified ACHD that as of the
publication date of the information
notice in the Federal Register (March
26, 2003), pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21(u),
ACHD was delegated full authority to
implement all portions of the federal
PSD program in 40 CFR 52.21. Future
additions, revisions, or deletions to 40
CFR 52.21 which are adopted by EPA
are automatically incorporated into this
delegation of authority agreement. EPA
noted that authority is delegated to
ACHD for all sources located in
Allegheny County subject to review
pursuant to the federal PSD program.
This includes all source categories listed
in 40 CFR 52.21 for each pollutant
regulated by the CAA (see 68 FR 14617).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On July 1, 2008, PADEP submitted
ACHD’s proposed revision to their
portion of the SIP. This SIP submission
adds Allegheny County’s Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD)
regulations at Article XXI section
2102.07 entitled, ‘‘Prevention of
Significant Deterioration,’’ by
incorporating by reference, the federal
PSD program at 40 CFR 52.21 in its
entirety. In addition, ACHD requests
that as their regulation automatically
incorporates by reference all future
changes to 40 CFR 52.21, that such
future changes be automatically
incorporated into the SIP.
The SIP revision submitted by ACHD
on July 1, 2008 contained a provision in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Jun 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
section 2102.07(d) that would relieve a
person of the duty to comply with the
PSD requirements as promulgated by
EPA and incorporated in section
2102.07 if such person was ‘‘legally
temporarily relieved of the duty to
comply.’’ On May 1, 2012 PADEP
submitted a letter notifying EPA that
they were withdrawing that portion of
the SIP revision.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve ACHD’s
PSD permitting program by proposing
approval of this SIP submission with the
exception of the language in section
2102.7 as described above. EPA has
determined that this revision is
approvable because it conforms to the
CAA and implementing regulations.
Additionally, EPA is proposing to
determine that ACHD has met its
obligations pursuant to the PSD portion
of the CAA infrastructure requirements
of sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J)
for the 1997 ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS
and the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Copies of
the technical support document
supporting EPA’s decision to approve
ACHD’s PSD permitting program and
EPA’s determination that ACHD has met
its obligations pursuant to the PSD
portion of the infrastructure
requirements of the CAA can be
obtained from the docket as discussed
in the ADDRESSES section above. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
34301
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed SIP
revision, regarding Allegheny County’s
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) program, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 21, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012–14138 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\11JNP1.SGM
11JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34300-34301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14138]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0378; FRL-9685-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Revision to Allegheny County Regulations for Prevention
of Significant Deterioration
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP). This revision pertains to the Air Pollution Control
portion of the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) Rules and
Regulations, relating to ACHD's Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) program. Additionally, EPA is proposing to make a determination
that the proposed SIP revision will satisfy the Clean Air Act (CAA)
infrastructure requirements relating to PSD for the 1997 ozone and
particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. This Action is being taken under the section
110(k) of the CAA.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2012-0378 by one of the following methods.
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: Cox.Kathleen@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0378, Kathleen Cox, Associate Director,
Office of Permits and Air Toxics, Mailcode 3AP10, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2012-0378. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105; and Allegheny County Health
Department, Bureau of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality,
301
[[Page 34301]]
39th Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul T. Wentworth, P.E. at: (215) 814-
2183, or by email at wentworth.paul@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. On July 1, 2008, PADEP
submitted a revision to its SIP on behalf ACHD. The SIP submittal
consists of changes to the ACHD Rules and Regulations, Article XXI, Air
Pollution Control, relating to ACHD's PSD program.
I. Background
On December 14, 1983, EPA delegated authority to ACHD to implement
and enforce the provisions of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 40 CFR 52.21 on behalf of EPA (see 48 FR 55625, December 14,
1983).
On February 13, 2003, ACHD requested EPA to update and affirm the
existing delegation of authority agreement between Allegheny County and
EPA based on the representations included in Allegheny County's
February 13, 2003 letter to EPA (see 68 FR 14617). On March 18, 2003,
EPA formally notified ACHD that as of the publication date of the
information notice in the Federal Register (March 26, 2003), pursuant
to 40 CFR 52.21(u), ACHD was delegated full authority to implement all
portions of the federal PSD program in 40 CFR 52.21. Future additions,
revisions, or deletions to 40 CFR 52.21 which are adopted by EPA are
automatically incorporated into this delegation of authority agreement.
EPA noted that authority is delegated to ACHD for all sources located
in Allegheny County subject to review pursuant to the federal PSD
program. This includes all source categories listed in 40 CFR 52.21 for
each pollutant regulated by the CAA (see 68 FR 14617).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On July 1, 2008, PADEP submitted ACHD's proposed revision to their
portion of the SIP. This SIP submission adds Allegheny County's
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations at Article
XXI section 2102.07 entitled, ``Prevention of Significant
Deterioration,'' by incorporating by reference, the federal PSD program
at 40 CFR 52.21 in its entirety. In addition, ACHD requests that as
their regulation automatically incorporates by reference all future
changes to 40 CFR 52.21, that such future changes be automatically
incorporated into the SIP.
The SIP revision submitted by ACHD on July 1, 2008 contained a
provision in section 2102.07(d) that would relieve a person of the duty
to comply with the PSD requirements as promulgated by EPA and
incorporated in section 2102.07 if such person was ``legally
temporarily relieved of the duty to comply.'' On May 1, 2012 PADEP
submitted a letter notifying EPA that they were withdrawing that
portion of the SIP revision.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve ACHD's PSD permitting program by
proposing approval of this SIP submission with the exception of the
language in section 2102.7 as described above. EPA has determined that
this revision is approvable because it conforms to the CAA and
implementing regulations. Additionally, EPA is proposing to determine
that ACHD has met its obligations pursuant to the PSD portion of the
CAA infrastructure requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II),
and (J) for the 1997 ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS and the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. Copies of the technical support document
supporting EPA's decision to approve ACHD's PSD permitting program and
EPA's determination that ACHD has met its obligations pursuant to the
PSD portion of the infrastructure requirements of the CAA can be
obtained from the docket as discussed in the ADDRESSES section above.
EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed SIP revision, regarding Allegheny
County's Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program, does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply
in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 21, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-14138 Filed 6-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P