Order Denying Export Privileges, 34340-34342 [2012-14109]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34340
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Notices
I have received notice of Wei’s
conviction for violating IEEPA and the
AECA, and have provided notice and an
opportunity for Wei to make a written
submission to BIS, as provided in
Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I have
not received a submission from Wei.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Wei’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of 10 years from the date of Wei’s
conviction. I have also decided to
revoke all licenses issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which Wei
had an interest at the time of her
conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered
I. Until January 28, 2021, Yufeng Wei,
a/k/a Annie Wei, with a last known
address at: 165 Beech Street, Belmont,
MA 02478, and when acting for or on
behalf of Wei, her representatives,
assigns, agents or employees (the
‘‘Denied Person’’), may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:21 Jun 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Wei by
affiliation, ownership, control or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
subject to the provisions of this Order if
necessary to prevent evasion of the
Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin
technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect until January
28, 2021.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the
Regulations, Wei may file an appeal of
this Order with the Under Secretary of
Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
VII. A copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Wei. This Order shall
be published in the Federal Register.
Issued this 4th day of June, 2012.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2012–14091 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of: Chitron Electronics,
Inc., 102 Clematis Avenue, Suite 7,
Waltham, MA 02453, Respondent,
Chitron Electronics Company Limited,
a/k/a Chi-Chuang Electronics Company
Limited, a/k/a Shenzhen Chitron
Electronics Company Limited, 2127
Sungang Road, Huatong Building 19/F,
Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518001,
China and Chitron (HK) Electronics
Company Limited, a/k/a C.I.C.
Electronics (HK) Limited, Room 05 13/
F Nanyang Plaza, No. 57 Hung To Road,
Kwum Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong,
Related Persons.
A. Denial of Export Privileges of
Chitron Electronics, Inc.
On January 28, 2011, in the U.S.
District Court, District of Massachusetts,
Chitron Electronics, Inc. (‘‘Chitron-US’’)
was convicted of violating the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.
(2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’) and Section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2778 (2000)) (‘‘AECA’’). Specifically,
Chitron-US was convicted of illegally
exporting various electronic
components and other items subject to
the Export Administration Regulations
(‘‘EAR’’ or ‘‘Regulations’’) 1 to end-users
in China between 2004 and 2007,
including to entities on the BIS Entity
List, and for military end-uses. ChitronUS was also convicted of illegally
exporting military electronic
components designated on the U.S.
Munitions List to China through Hong
Kong between 2004 and 2007. In
addition, Chitron-US was convicted of
conspiring over a period of 10 years to
violate the IEEPA and AECA (18 U.S.C.
371) and aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C.
2). Chitron-US was ordered to pay a
$10,400 Special Assessment and a $15.5
million fine. Chitron-US is also listed on
the Department of State’s Debarred List.
Section 766.25 of the Regulations
provides, in pertinent part, that ‘‘[t]he
Director of the Office of Exporter
Services, in consultation with the
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2011). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
EAA (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000)). Since
August 21, 2001, the EAA has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 C.F.R., 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which
has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of August 12,
2011 (76 FR 50661, August 16, 2011), has continued
the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701
et seq. (2000)).
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the [Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’)], the EAR,
of any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. § 2410(h). In addition, Section
750.8 of the Regulations states that the
Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office
of Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
I have received notice of Chitron-US’s
conviction for violating IEEPA and the
AECA, and have provided notice and an
opportunity for Chitron-US to make a
written submission to BIS, as provided
in Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I
have not received a submission from
Chitron-US. Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Chitron-US’s
export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of 10 years from the date of
Chitron-US’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Chitron-US had an interest at the
time of its conviction.
B. Denial of Export Privileges of Related
Person
Pursuant to Sections 766.25(h) and
766.23 of the Regulations, the Director
of BIS’s Office of Exporter Services, in
consultation with the Director of BIS’s
Office of Export Enforcement, may take
action to name persons related to a
Respondent by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or
other connection in the conduct of trade
or business in order to prevent evasion
of a denial order. Chitron Electronics
Company Limited (‘‘ChitronShenzhen’’), located in China, is the
parent company of Chitron-US and was
also indicted for the same crimes as
Chitron-US. Chitron (HK) Electronics
Company Limited (‘‘Chitron-HK’’), is a
branch office of Chitron-US, located in
Hong Kong. The illegal enterprise
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:21 Jun 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
involved the use of Chitron-US, as a
front company, and Chitron-HK, as a
transit point, to funnel goods to its
parent company, Chitron-Shenzhen for
final delivery to end-users in China.
Chitron-Shenzhen and Chitron-HK are
related to Chitron-US by ownership,
control, position of responsibility,
affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business. BIS
believes that naming Chitron-Shenzhen
and Chitron-HK as related persons to
Chitron-US is necessary to avoid
evasion of the denial order against
Chitron-US.
As provided in Section 766.23 of the
Regulations, I gave notice to ChitronShenzhen and Chitron-HK that their
export privileges under the Regulations
could be denied for up to 10 years due
to their relationship with Chitron-US
and that BIS believes naming them as
persons related to Chitron-US would be
necessary to prevent evasion of a denial
order imposed against Chitron-US. In
providing such notice, I gave ChitronShenzhen and Chitron-HK an
opportunity to oppose their addition to
the Chitron-US Denial Order as a related
party. Having received no submission, I
have decided, following consultations
with BIS’s Office of Export Enforcement,
including its Director, to name ChitronShenzhen and Chitron-HK as Related
Persons to the Chitron-US Denial Order,
thereby denying their export privileges
for 10 years from the date of ChitronUS’s conviction.
I have also decided to revoke all
licenses issued pursuant to the Act or
Regulations in which the Related
Persons had an interest at the time of
Chitron-US’s conviction. The 10-year
denial period will end on January 28,
2021.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
I. Until January 28, 2021, Chitron
Electronics, Inc. with a last known
address at: 102 Clematis Avenue, Suite
7, Waltham, MA 02453, and when
acting for or on behalf of Chitron-US, its
successors or assigns, agents or
employees (collectively referred to
hereinafter as the ‘‘Denied Person’’), and
the following persons related to the
Denied Person as defined by Section
766.23 of the Regulations: Chitron
Electronics Company Limited, a/k/a
Chi-Chuang Electronics Company
Limited, a/k/a Shenzhen Chitron
Electronics Company Limited, with a
last known address at: 2127 Sungang
Road, Huatong Building 19/F, Luohu
District, Shenzhen, 518001, China; and
Chitron (HK) Electronics Company
Limited, a/k/a C.I.C. Electronics (HK)
Limited, with a last known address at:
Room 05 13/F Nanyang Plaza, No. 57
Hung To Road, Kwum Tong, Kowloon,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34341
Hong Kong, and when acting for or on
their behalf, their successors or assigns,
agents, or employees (‘‘the Related
Persons’’) (together, the Denied Person
and the Related Persons are ‘‘Persons
Subject to this Order’’), may not,
directly or indirectly, participate in any
way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including but
not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Persons Subject to this Order any
item subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Persons Subject to this Order of the
ownership, possession, or control of any
item subject to the Regulations that has
been or will be exported from the
United States, including financing or
other support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Persons Subject
to this Order acquire or attempt to
acquire such ownership, possession or
control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Persons Subject to
this Order of any item subject to the
Regulations that has been exported from
the United States;
D. Obtain from the Persons Subject to
this Order in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with
knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be,
exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Persons
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
34342
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Notices
Subject to this Order, or service any
item, of whatever origin, that is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Persons
Subject to this Order if such service
involves the use of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States. For
purposes of this paragraph, servicing
means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
III. In addition to the Related Persons
named above, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
other person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to the
Denied Person by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in
the conduct of trade or related services
may also be made subject to the
provisions of this Order if necessary to
prevent evasion of the Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin
technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect until January
28, 2021.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the
Regulations, Chitron-US may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
VII. In accordance with Part 756 of the
Regulations, the Related Persons may
also file an appeal of this Order with the
Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security. The appeal must
be filed within 45 days from the date of
this Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
VIII. A copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Denied Person and the
Related Persons. This Order shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Issued this 4th day of June, 2012.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2012–14109 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of:
Zhen Zhou Wu,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:21 Jun 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
a/k/a Alex Wu,
Currently Incarcerated at:
Inmate Number: 40887–424
FMC Devens,
Federal Medical Center,
P.O. Box 879,
Ayer, MA 01432,
and with an Address at:
2127 Sungang Building 19/F,
Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518001,
China.
On January 26, 2011, in the U.S.
District Court, District of Massachusetts,
Zhen Zhou Wu, a/k/a Alex Wu (‘‘Wu’’)
was convicted of violating the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.
(2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’) and violating Section
38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22
U.S.C. 2778 (2000)) (‘‘AECA’’).
Specifically, Wu was convicted of
illegally exporting various electronic
components and other items subject to
the Export Administration Regulations
(the ‘‘Regulations’’) to end-users in
China between 2004 and 2007,
including to entities on the BIS Entity
List, and for military end-uses. Wu was
also convicted of illegally exporting
military electronic components
designated on the U.S. Munitions List to
China through Hong Kong between 2004
and 2007. In addition, Wu was
convicted of conspiring over a period of
10 years to violate IEEPA and AECA (18
U.S.C. 371); aiding and abetting (18
U.S.C. 2); and filing false shipping
documents with the Department of
Commerce (18 U.S.C. 1001). Wu was
sentenced to 97 months in prison, 24
months of supervised release, a $1,700
Special Assessment and a $15,000 fine.
Wu is also listed on the Department of
State’s Debarred List.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the [Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’)], the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2011). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 12, 2011 (76 FR 50661 (August
16, 2011)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. (2000)).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. § 2410(h). In addition, Section
750.8 of the Regulations states that the
Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office
of Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
I have received notice of Wu’s
conviction for violating IEEPA and the
AECA, and have provided notice and an
opportunity for Wu to make a written
submission to BIS, as provided in
Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I have
not received a submission from Wu.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Wu’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of 10 years from the date of Wu’s
conviction. I have also decided to
revoke all licenses issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which Wu had
an interest at the time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
I. Until January 26, 2021, Zhen Zhou
Wu, a/k/a Alex Wu, with last known
addresses at: Inmate Number: 40887–
424, FMC Devens, Federal Medical
Center, P.O. Box 879, Ayer, MA 01432
and 2127 Sungang Road, Huatong
Building 19/F, Luohu District,
Shenzhen, 518001, China, and when
acting for or on behalf of Wu, his
representatives, assigns, agents or
employees (the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may
not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34340-34342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14109]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of: Chitron Electronics, Inc., 102 Clematis Avenue,
Suite 7, Waltham, MA 02453, Respondent, Chitron Electronics Company
Limited, a/k/a Chi-Chuang Electronics Company Limited, a/k/a Shenzhen
Chitron Electronics Company Limited, 2127 Sungang Road, Huatong
Building 19/F, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518001, China and Chitron (HK)
Electronics Company Limited, a/k/a C.I.C. Electronics (HK) Limited,
Room 05 13/F Nanyang Plaza, No. 57 Hung To Road, Kwum Tong, Kowloon,
Hong Kong, Related Persons.
A. Denial of Export Privileges of Chitron Electronics, Inc.
On January 28, 2011, in the U.S. District Court, District of
Massachusetts, Chitron Electronics, Inc. (``Chitron-US'') was convicted
of violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701 et seq. (2000)) (``IEEPA'') and Section 38 of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2000)) (``AECA''). Specifically, Chitron-
US was convicted of illegally exporting various electronic components
and other items subject to the Export Administration Regulations
(``EAR'' or ``Regulations'') \1\ to end-users in China between 2004 and
2007, including to entities on the BIS Entity List, and for military
end-uses. Chitron-US was also convicted of illegally exporting military
electronic components designated on the U.S. Munitions List to China
through Hong Kong between 2004 and 2007. In addition, Chitron-US was
convicted of conspiring over a period of 10 years to violate the IEEPA
and AECA (18 U.S.C. 371) and aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C. 2).
Chitron-US was ordered to pay a $10,400 Special Assessment and a $15.5
million fine. Chitron-US is also listed on the Department of State's
Debarred List.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2011). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the EAA (50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec. 2401-2420
(2000)). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3
C.F.R., 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by
successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of
August 12, 2011 (76 FR 50661, August 16, 2011), has continued the
Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. (2000)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 766.25 of the Regulations provides, in pertinent part, that
``[t]he Director of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation
with the
[[Page 34341]]
Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been convicted of a violation of the
[Export Administration Act (``EAA'')], the EAR, of any order, license
or authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. Sec. 2410(h). The denial of
export privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10
years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50
U.S.C. app. Sec. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the
Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security
(``BIS'') licenses previously issued in which the person had an
interest in at the time of his conviction.
I have received notice of Chitron-US's conviction for violating
IEEPA and the AECA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for
Chitron-US to make a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section
766.25 of the Regulations. I have not received a submission from
Chitron-US. Based upon my review and consultations with BIS's Office of
Export Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to
BIS, I have decided to deny Chitron-US's export privileges under the
Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Chitron-US's
conviction. I have also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant
to the Act or Regulations in which Chitron-US had an interest at the
time of its conviction.
B. Denial of Export Privileges of Related Person
Pursuant to Sections 766.25(h) and 766.23 of the Regulations, the
Director of BIS's Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the
Director of BIS's Office of Export Enforcement, may take action to name
persons related to a Respondent by ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of
trade or business in order to prevent evasion of a denial order.
Chitron Electronics Company Limited (``Chitron-Shenzhen''), located in
China, is the parent company of Chitron-US and was also indicted for
the same crimes as Chitron-US. Chitron (HK) Electronics Company Limited
(``Chitron-HK''), is a branch office of Chitron-US, located in Hong
Kong. The illegal enterprise involved the use of Chitron-US, as a front
company, and Chitron-HK, as a transit point, to funnel goods to its
parent company, Chitron-Shenzhen for final delivery to end-users in
China. Chitron-Shenzhen and Chitron-HK are related to Chitron-US by
ownership, control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or business. BIS believes that
naming Chitron-Shenzhen and Chitron-HK as related persons to Chitron-US
is necessary to avoid evasion of the denial order against Chitron-US.
As provided in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, I gave notice to
Chitron-Shenzhen and Chitron-HK that their export privileges under the
Regulations could be denied for up to 10 years due to their
relationship with Chitron-US and that BIS believes naming them as
persons related to Chitron-US would be necessary to prevent evasion of
a denial order imposed against Chitron-US. In providing such notice, I
gave Chitron-Shenzhen and Chitron-HK an opportunity to oppose their
addition to the Chitron-US Denial Order as a related party. Having
received no submission, I have decided, following consultations with
BIS's Office of Export Enforcement, including its Director, to name
Chitron-Shenzhen and Chitron-HK as Related Persons to the Chitron-US
Denial Order, thereby denying their export privileges for 10 years from
the date of Chitron-US's conviction.
I have also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the
Act or Regulations in which the Related Persons had an interest at the
time of Chitron-US's conviction. The 10-year denial period will end on
January 28, 2021.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
I. Until January 28, 2021, Chitron Electronics, Inc. with a last
known address at: 102 Clematis Avenue, Suite 7, Waltham, MA 02453, and
when acting for or on behalf of Chitron-US, its successors or assigns,
agents or employees (collectively referred to hereinafter as the
``Denied Person''), and the following persons related to the Denied
Person as defined by Section 766.23 of the Regulations: Chitron
Electronics Company Limited, a/k/a Chi-Chuang Electronics Company
Limited, a/k/a Shenzhen Chitron Electronics Company Limited, with a
last known address at: 2127 Sungang Road, Huatong Building 19/F, Luohu
District, Shenzhen, 518001, China; and Chitron (HK) Electronics Company
Limited, a/k/a C.I.C. Electronics (HK) Limited, with a last known
address at: Room 05 13/F Nanyang Plaza, No. 57 Hung To Road, Kwum Tong,
Kowloon, Hong Kong, and when acting for or on their behalf, their
successors or assigns, agents, or employees (``the Related Persons'')
(together, the Denied Person and the Related Persons are ``Persons
Subject to this Order''), may not, directly or indirectly, participate
in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or
technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported
or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations,
including but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Persons Subject to
this Order any item subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Persons Subject to this Order of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has
been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or
other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Persons
Subject to this Order acquire or attempt to acquire such ownership,
possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Persons Subject to this Order of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Persons Subject to this Order in the United
States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to
know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Persons
[[Page 34342]]
Subject to this Order, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is
owned, possessed or controlled by the Persons Subject to this Order if
such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations
that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes
of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
III. In addition to the Related Persons named above, after notice
and opportunity for comment as provided in section 766.23 of the
Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to the Denied Person by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this
Order if necessary to prevent evasion of the Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved
that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect
until January 28, 2021.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Chitron-US may
file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the
date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of
the Regulations.
VII. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, the Related
Persons may also file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within
45 days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions
of Part 756 of the Regulations.
VIII. A copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Denied Person
and the Related Persons. This Order shall be published in the Federal
Register.
Issued this 4th day of June, 2012.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-14109 Filed 6-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P