Clothing Allowance; Correction, 34218 [2012-14108]
Download as PDF
34218
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AN64
Clothing Allowance; Correction
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) published a final rule on
November 16, 2011, amending its
adjudication regulations governing
eligibility for clothing allowances. VA
has since determined that certain
language added to the final rule could
be construed to impose a restriction that
VA did not intend. This document
corrects that error.
DATES: This correction is effective June
11, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Kniffen, Chief, Compensation Service,
Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–9725. This is not a
toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 2, 2011, VA published a
proposed rule (76 FR 5733) to revise 38
CFR 3.810 to clarify the circumstances
under which a veteran may be entitled
to more than one clothing allowance.
Proposed paragraph (a)(2)(ii) explained
that a veteran who uses more than one
prosthetic or orthopedic appliance or
medication would be eligible for a
clothing allowance for each such
appliance or medication if each
appliance or medication ‘‘[a]ffects a
distinct article of clothing or
outergarment.’’
On November 16, 2011, VA published
the final rule (76 FR 70883). In the final
rule, VA stated that it was revising
proposed paragraph (a)(2)(ii) in order to
‘‘clarify that the references to garments
or clothing in this regulation are to
types of garments, such as shirts, rather
than to individual garments, such as a
specific shirt’’ and to make clear that
‘‘more than one clothing allowance is
payable when more than one type of
article of clothing or outergarment is
affected.’’ The final rule revised
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) to state that a veteran
who uses more than one appliance or
medication would be eligible for a
clothing allowance for each such
appliance or medication if each
appliance or medication ‘‘[a]ffects more
than one type of article of clothing or
outergarment.’’
VA has determined that the language
of the final rule could be construed to
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Jun 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
mean that each individual appliance or
medication used by a veteran must
affect more than one type of article of
clothing or outergarment in order to
qualify for a clothing allowance. As
explained in the final-rule notice,
however, VA did not intend to impose
such a requirement, but intended only
to clarify that each appliance or
medication must affect a distinct type of
article of clothing or outergarment, such
as shirts, in order to qualify for a
clothing allowance. Requiring each
appliance or medication to affect more
than one type of article of clothing or
outergarment would impose an
unintended restriction on eligibility for
the clothing allowance and would create
significant inconsistencies in VA’s
clothing-allowance regulation. To
correct this inadvertent error, VA is
amending 38 CFR 3.810(a)(2)(ii) by
replacing the words ‘‘more than one
type’’ with the words ‘‘a distinct type’’.
This change will make clear that an
appliance or medication only needs to
affect a distinct type of clothing or
outergarment in order to qualify for a
clothing allowance. This change does
not alter the intended meaning of the
regulation as explained in the proposed
rule and the final rule notice, but would
eliminate the potential for confusion or
misinterpretation created by the
ambiguous language included in the
final rule.
Pursuant to the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b), VA has
determined that notice and prior
opportunity for comment on this
correcting amendment are unnecessary
and contrary to public interest. As
stated above, this correction is needed
to accurately reflect the intent of the
final rule and codified regulation and
ensure that the inadvertent error does
not adversely affect claimants. We
previously provided public notice in the
Federal Register and considered public
comments on the proposed rule. See 76
FR 5733 and 76 FR 70883. VA’s intent
and interpretation of § 3.810(a)(2)(ii) has
not changed. This correction merely
ensures clarity of VA’s intent and
interpretation regarding the eligibility
for a clothing allowance. For these
reasons, VA has also determined
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) that there is
good cause to make this change effective
on the date of its publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive
materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Approved: June 6, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Direc tor, Regulation Policy and Management,
Office of the General Counsel, Department
of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is corrected by
making the following correcting
amendment:
PART 3—ADJUDICATION
Subpart A—Pension, Compensation,
and Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation
1. The authority citation for part 3,
subpart A continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless
otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 3.810(a)(2)(ii) by removing
‘‘more than one type’’ and adding, in its
place, ‘‘a distinct type’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2012–14108 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0080; FRL–9683–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Regional Haze
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing a limited
approval of revisions to the Indiana
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) on
January 14, 2011, and March 10, 2011,
addressing regional haze for the first
implementation period that ends 2018.
This action is being taken in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) and EPA’s rules for states to
prevent and remedy future and existing
anthropogenic impairment of visibility
in mandatory Class I areas through a
regional haze program. As part of this
action, EPA is also approving limits for
the Alcoa facility that EPA finds satisfy
the requirements for best available
retrofit technology (BART).
DATES: This final rule is effective on July
11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0080. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14108]
[[Page 34218]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AN64
Clothing Allowance; Correction
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a final rule
on November 16, 2011, amending its adjudication regulations governing
eligibility for clothing allowances. VA has since determined that
certain language added to the final rule could be construed to impose a
restriction that VA did not intend. This document corrects that error.
DATES: This correction is effective June 11, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Kniffen, Chief, Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9725.
This is not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 2, 2011, VA published a proposed
rule (76 FR 5733) to revise 38 CFR 3.810 to clarify the circumstances
under which a veteran may be entitled to more than one clothing
allowance. Proposed paragraph (a)(2)(ii) explained that a veteran who
uses more than one prosthetic or orthopedic appliance or medication
would be eligible for a clothing allowance for each such appliance or
medication if each appliance or medication ``[a]ffects a distinct
article of clothing or outergarment.''
On November 16, 2011, VA published the final rule (76 FR 70883). In
the final rule, VA stated that it was revising proposed paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) in order to ``clarify that the references to garments or
clothing in this regulation are to types of garments, such as shirts,
rather than to individual garments, such as a specific shirt'' and to
make clear that ``more than one clothing allowance is payable when more
than one type of article of clothing or outergarment is affected.'' The
final rule revised paragraph (a)(2)(ii) to state that a veteran who
uses more than one appliance or medication would be eligible for a
clothing allowance for each such appliance or medication if each
appliance or medication ``[a]ffects more than one type of article of
clothing or outergarment.''
VA has determined that the language of the final rule could be
construed to mean that each individual appliance or medication used by
a veteran must affect more than one type of article of clothing or
outergarment in order to qualify for a clothing allowance. As explained
in the final-rule notice, however, VA did not intend to impose such a
requirement, but intended only to clarify that each appliance or
medication must affect a distinct type of article of clothing or
outergarment, such as shirts, in order to qualify for a clothing
allowance. Requiring each appliance or medication to affect more than
one type of article of clothing or outergarment would impose an
unintended restriction on eligibility for the clothing allowance and
would create significant inconsistencies in VA's clothing-allowance
regulation. To correct this inadvertent error, VA is amending 38 CFR
3.810(a)(2)(ii) by replacing the words ``more than one type'' with the
words ``a distinct type''. This change will make clear that an
appliance or medication only needs to affect a distinct type of
clothing or outergarment in order to qualify for a clothing allowance.
This change does not alter the intended meaning of the regulation as
explained in the proposed rule and the final rule notice, but would
eliminate the potential for confusion or misinterpretation created by
the ambiguous language included in the final rule.
Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b), VA
has determined that notice and prior opportunity for comment on this
correcting amendment are unnecessary and contrary to public interest.
As stated above, this correction is needed to accurately reflect the
intent of the final rule and codified regulation and ensure that the
inadvertent error does not adversely affect claimants. We previously
provided public notice in the Federal Register and considered public
comments on the proposed rule. See 76 FR 5733 and 76 FR 70883. VA's
intent and interpretation of Sec. 3.810(a)(2)(ii) has not changed.
This correction merely ensures clarity of VA's intent and
interpretation regarding the eligibility for a clothing allowance. For
these reasons, VA has also determined pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) that
there is good cause to make this change effective on the date of its
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: June 6, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Direc tor, Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is corrected
by making the following correcting amendment:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
Subpart A--Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation
0
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 3.810(a)(2)(ii) by removing ``more than one type'' and
adding, in its place, ``a distinct type''.
[FR Doc. 2012-14108 Filed 6-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P