National Appeals Office Rules of Procedure, 33980-33985 [2012-13979]
Download as PDF
33980
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 111
Friday, June 8, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Dated: June 5, 2012.
Brian Grosner,
General Manager.
[FR Doc. 2012–13978 Filed 6–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
SAFETY BOARD
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
10 CFR Part 1703
Proposed FOIA Fee Schedule Update
15 CFR Part 906
[Docket. No 101019524–2112–01]
Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board.
RIN 0648–BA36
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction.
National Appeals Office Rules of
Procedure
AGENCY:
ACTION:
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION to the
Board’s proposed FOIA Fee Schedule
Update published in the Federal
Register of June 1, 2012. The document
contained incorrect dates and
references.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Grosner, General Manager,
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board,
625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700,
Washington, DC 20004–2901, (202) 694–
7060.
Correction
In proposed rule FR Doc. 2012–13295,
dated June 1, 2012 on page 32433 in the
third column, the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section should read:
The FOIA
requires each Federal agency covered by
the Act to specify a schedule of fees
applicable to processing of requests for
agency records. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(i).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of the
Board’s regulations, the Board’s General
Manager will update the FOIA Fee
Schedule once every 12 months.
Previous Fee Schedule Updates were
published in the Federal Register and
went into effect, most recently, on July
22, 2011, 76 FR 43819. The Board’s
proposed fee schedule is consistent with
the guidance. The components of the
proposed fees (hourly charges for search
and review and charges for copies of
requested documents) are based upon
the Board’s specific cost.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jun 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
This proposed rule would
establish procedures governing the
National Appeals Office (NAO), a
division of NMFS’ Office of
Management and Budget within NOAA.
NAO’s central mission is to provide an
efficient means of adjudicating appeals
by providing due process and
consistency to NMFS’ administrative
decisions. This proposed rule would
establish a process by which NMFS
could review, and if necessary correct,
decisions about certain limited access
privilege programs under Section 303A
of the Magnuson-Steven Fishery
Conservation and Management Act. The
proposed procedures could also be used
to adjudicate appeals from other offices
that incorporate these rules into their
regulations or otherwise notify potential
appellants of the procedures’
applicability to their proceedings.
DATES: NMFS invites interested persons
to submit comments on this proposed
rule. To ensure consideration,
comments must be in writing and must
be received by July 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2011–0266,
by one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via Federal
e-Rulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
first click the ‘‘submit a comment’’ icon,
then enter NOAA–NMFS–2011–0266 in
the keyword search. Locate the
document you wish to comment on
from the resulting list and click on the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon on the right
of that line.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Steven Goodman, National Appeals
Office, Office of Management and
Budget, NMFS, 1315 East West Hwy.,
Room 9553, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
• Fax: 301–713–2384; Attn: Steven
Goodman.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Goodman, National Appeals
Office, Office of Management & Budget,
NMFS, 1315 East West Hwy., Room
9553, Silver Spring, MD 20910;
nmfs.nao.contact@noaa.gov; (301) 427–
8774. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Individuals with hearing or speech
impairments may access the telephone
number above via TTY by calling the
Federal Information Relay Service at
(800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In 2007, Congress added section 303A
to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA). Section 303A authorizes limited
access privilege programs (LAPP) and
requires NMFS to ‘‘include an appeals
process for administrative review of the
Secretary’s decisions regarding initial
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
allocation of limited access privileges.’’
Most of the appeals processes currently
used by NMFS pre-date the new MSA
requirement. Further, the current
infrastructure for LAPP appeals does not
achieve optimum economies of scale, or
efficient use of resources.
LAPPs may provide benefits to certain
members of the public, while excluding
others. Thus, a transparent, unbiased
and clear appeals process is essential.
LAPP applicants across the country
should be provided with a uniform level
of due process and consistent
procedures for filing and deciding
appeals. Further, a robust administrative
appeals process provides a means for an
agency to make corrections and avoid
costly litigation. Accordingly, NMFS is
proposing to adopt procedural
regulations at 15 CFR part 906, which
would designate NAO, a division within
NMFS Office of Management and
Budget, as adjudicator for all future
appeals arising under section 303A of
the MSA. NAO may also be used for
other Department of Commerce
adjudications if the proposed
regulations are adopted by regulation or
other means and potential appellants
are given notice. For example, other
programs that may opt into the NAO
process may include the Alaska Charter
Halibut Limited Access Program or the
North Pacific Groundfish Observer
Program.
NAO adjudicates initial
administrative determinations, defined
in the proposed rule as agency actions
that directly and adversely affect an
appellant. Typically, although not
exclusively, NAO proceedings are for
appeals of denials of permits or other
limited access privileges. The proposed
rule does not encompass proceedings
made available pursuant to 15 CFR part
904. The regulations at 15 CFR part 904
are for administrative proceedings over
cases involving a Notice of Violation
and Assessment of civil penalty, permit
sanctions, written warnings, or seizure
and forfeiture of property for violating
34 statutes NOAA enforces. The
regulations codified at 15 CFR part 904
provide distinct procedures, including a
different administrative process that
includes the agency as a party to an
appeal.
The proposed action should avoid
future unnecessary costs and
redundancies through a centralized
administrative appeals process for
review of initial administrative
determinations. A centralized system for
adjudicating appeals is more cost
effective than duplicating the appeals
function in each region. Historically,
administrative appeals were processed
by NMFS’ regional offices. Each NMFS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jun 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
region has had a different structure and
process for resolving appeals.
The proposed action will promote
consistency in decision making and
responsiveness to due process
considerations. A centralized office will
use experienced, full-time adjudicators
to decide appeals, and programs would
benefit from their collective experience
and institutional memory. A cadre of
experienced and well-trained appellate
officers would free other employees to
use their time performing duties within
their area of expertise. Under the
current proposal, NAO could adjudicate
appeals in one location. This will allow
for economies of scale and freeing-up of
resources for use in regional offices.
Typically, NAO will be used for
informal administrative appeals. The
proposed rule allows flexibility in
determining what type and how many
pre-hearing conferences are needed. An
appellate officer has the discretion to
hold a scheduling and/or pre-hearing
conference if he or she thinks one is
needed to materially advance the
proceeding. An appellate officer’s
discretion in determining whether to
hold a scheduling and/or pre-hearing
conference will be guided by the
following: settlement, if allowed under
applicable law; clarification of the
issues under review; stipulations;
hearing(s) date, time, and location;
identification of witnesses for the
hearing(s); development of the NAO
case record, and; other matters that may
aid in the disposition of the
proceedings.
Hearings are also held at the
discretion of an appellate officer or if
the appellate officer considers such
hearing will materially advance his or
her evaluation of the issues under
appeal. In determining whether to hold
a hearing, an appellate officer’s
discretion will be guided by whether the
appellate officer believes oral testimony
is required to resolve a material issue of
fact or whether oral presentation is
needed to probe a party’s position on a
material issue of law. Conferences and
hearings may be in person, but more
likely, they will be held by telephone or
by other electronic means. The rule does
not bar face-to-face hearings, but it is
not intended to require expenditure of
funds in order for an appellant to
participate, or at its discretion, the
agency to participate, in a hearing.
The proposed regulations address
operations as well as events that occur
during the course of adjudicating an
appeal filed with NAO. The proposed
rule provides who may file, how and
when to initiate an appeal, and what
constitutes the agency record and
transmittal for inclusion in the NAO
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33981
case record for the appeal. During a
hearing and while the record is open,
the appellate officer determines whether
additional evidence should be admitted
in the NAO case record. The proposed
rule prohibits ex parte communications,
but clarifies that non-substantive
communications or communications
about procedural matters are
permissible. The proposed rule
establishes time frames and deadlines
for actions to ensure a reasonably
expeditious review, and while that may
be modified, that would not be the
norm.
NAO will produce written decisions
upholding or reversing the
administrative determination under
review. The proposed rule establishes
parameters for written decisions. The
appellant has the burden of proving by
a preponderance of the evidence that he
or she should prevail. Thus it is
incumbent upon the appellant to garner
and present evidence to support his or
her claim.
Generally, under the proposed rule a
decision issued by NAO becomes final
30 days after issuance. The effective
date of the final decision is subject to
delay for reconsideration by NAO, or
review by a Regional Administrator of
NMFS or other appropriate official.
NAO will follow applicable federal law
and policy which may include
publishing NAO and Regional
Administrator decisions on NAO’s Web
site.
Classifications
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This regulation does not create any new
regulatory requirements, but instead
codifies procedural rules for certain
administrative adjudication
proceedings. The proposed rule would
not create any new obligations for small
entities; rather, it would ensure a
standardized and centralized appeals
process for decisions regarding initial
allocation of limited access privileges.
As a result, any potential economic
impact on small entities would be
nominal. While it is possible that a
substantial number of small entities
could participate in the adjudication
proceedings, the procedures being
established here would not have a
significant economic impact on those
entities. Implementing standardized
rules could actually reduce the
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
33982
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
economic burden on small entities by
providing procedural certainty to the
parties participating in the proceedings.
Because this proposed rule, if
enacted, would not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 906
Administrative appeals,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Fisheries.
Dated: June 4, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
§ 906.2
For reasons stated in the preamble,
NMFS proposes to add 15 CFR part 906
as follows:
PART 906—NATIONAL APPEALS
OFFICE RULES OF PROCEDURE
Sec.
906.1 Purpose and scope.
906.2 Definitions.
906.3 Requesting an appeal and agency
record.
906.4 General filing requirements.
906.5 Service.
906.6 Ex parte communications.
906.7 Disqualification of appellate officer.
906.8 Scheduling and pre-hearing
conferences.
906.9 Exhibits.
906.10 Evidence.
906.11 Hearing.
906.12 Closing the evidentiary portion of
the NAO case record.
906.13 Failure to appear.
906.14 Burden of proof.
906.15 Decisions.
906.16 Reconsideration.
906.17 Review by the Regional
Administrator.
906.18 Implementation of final decisions.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1374, 1375 & 1416; 16 U.S.C. 1540; 16 U.S.C.
773f; 16 U.S.C. 973f; 16 U.S.C. 1174; 16
U.S.C. 2437; 16 U.S.C. 4013; 16 U.S.C. 5507;
16 U.S.C. 7009; 16 U.S.C. 3637; 16 U.S.C.
5103 & 5106; 16 U.S.C. 5154 & 5158; 16
U.S.C. 6905, and; 16 U.S.C. 5010.
§ 906.1
Purpose and scope.
(a) This part sets forth the procedures
governing proceedings before the
National Appeals Office (NAO). These
procedures provide standard rules of
practice for administrative adjudications
by NAO.
(b) NAO will adjudicate appeals of
initial administrative determinations in
limited access privilege programs
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jun 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
developed under section 303A of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA) and approved after the effective
date of these regulations. Those appeals
are informal proceedings.
(c) The procedures contained in this
part may be incorporated by reference in
rules or regulations other than those
promulgated pursuant to section 303A
of the MSA. The Secretary may also
request that NAO adjudicate appeals in
any matter in controversy that requires
findings of fact and conclusions of law,
and other quasi-judicial matters that the
Secretary deems appropriate, consistent
with existing regulations. The Secretary
shall provide notice to potential
appellants and to any affected party in
these other matters through regulations
or actual notice.
Definitions.
Agency record means all material and
information, including electronic, the
office that issued the initial
administrative determination relied on
or considered in reaching its decision,
or which otherwise is related to the
initial administrative determination.
Appeal means an appellant’s petition
to appeal an initial administrative
determination and all administrative
processes of the National Appeals Office
related thereto.
Appellant means a person who
receives an initial administrative
determination and appeals it to the
National Appeals Office.
Appellate officer means an individual
designated by the Chief of the National
Appeals Office to adjudicate the appeal.
The term may include the Chief of the
National Appeals Office.
Day means calendar day unless
otherwise specified by the Chief of the
National Appeals Office. When
computing any time period specified
under these rules, count every day,
including intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal holidays.
Department or DOC means the
Department of Commerce.
Ex parte communication means any
oral or written communication about the
merits of a pending appeal between one
party and the National Appeals Office
with respect to which reasonable prior
notice to all parties is not given.
However, ex parte communication does
not include inquiries regarding
procedures, scheduling, and status.
Initial Administrative Determination
or IAD means a determination made by
an official of the National Marine
Fisheries Services that directly and
adversely affects a person’s ability to
hold, acquire, use, or be issued a limited
access privilege. The term also includes
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determinations issued pursuant to other
federal law, for which review has been
assigned to the National Appeals Office
by the Secretary.
NAO means the National Appeals
Office, an adjudicatory body within the
Office of Management and Budget,
National Marine Fisheries Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Department of
Commerce. The term generally means
all NAO personnel, including appellate
officers.
NAO case record means the Agency
record and all additional documents
and other materials related to an appeal
and maintained by NAO in a case file.
NMFS means the National Marine
Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Department of Commerce.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration or NOAA means the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
Party means a person who files a
petition for appeal with NAO. It can
also mean an office that issued the IAD
if that office participates in the NAO
appeal.
Person means any individual
(whether or not a citizen or national of
the United States), corporation,
partnership, association, or other entity
(whether or not organized or existing
under the laws of any State), and any
Federal, State, or local, or foreign
government or entity of any such
government.
Regional Administrator means the
administrator of one of six regions of
NMFS: Northeast, Southeast, Northwest,
Southwest, Alaska, or Pacific Islands.
The term also includes an official with
similar authority within the DOC, such
as the Director of NMFS’ Office of
Sustainable Fisheries.
Representative means an individual
properly authorized by an Appellant in
writing to act for the Appellant in
conjunction with an appeal pending in
NAO. The representative does not need
to be a licensed attorney.
Secretary means the Secretary of
Commerce or a designee.
§ 906.3 Requesting an appeal and agency
record.
(a) Who May File. Any person who
receives an initial administrative
determination.
(b) Petition to Appeal. (1) To request
an appeal, a person shall submit a
written petition of appeal to NAO.
(2) The petition shall include a copy
of the initial administrative
determination the person wishes to
appeal.
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(3) In the petition, the person shall
state how the initial administrative
determination directly and adversely
affects him or her, why he or she
believes the initial administrative
determination is wrong, and whether he
or she requests a hearing or prefers that
an appellate officer make a decision
based on the NAO case record and
without a hearing.
(i) Arguments not raised by the person
in his or her petition to appeal will be
deemed waived.
(ii) The petition may include
additional documentation in support of
the appeal.
(4) If a person requests a hearing, the
written request must include a concise
statement raising genuine and
substantial issues of a material fact or
law that cannot be resolved based on the
documentary evidence.
(5) In the petition, a person shall state
whether the person has a representative,
and if so, the name, address, and
telephone number for the
representative.
(c) Address of record. In the petition
the person shall identify the address of
record. Documents directed to the
appellant will be mailed to the address
of record, unless the appellant provides
NAO and other parties with any changes
to his or her address in writing.
(1) The address of record may include
a representative’s address.
(2) NAO bears no responsibility if the
appellant or his or her representative
does not receive documents because
appellant or his or her representative
changes his or her address without
proper notification to NAO.
(3) NAO bears no responsibility if the
appellant or his or her representative
fail to retrieve documents upon
notification from the United States
Postal Service or commercial carrier.
(4) NAO will presume that documents
addressed to an address of record and
properly mailed or given to a
commercial carrier for delivery are
received.
(d) Place of filing. The petition must
be transmitted via facsimile. The
facsimile number is: 301–713–2384. If
the person filing the petition does not
have access to a fax machine, he or she
may file the petition by mail or
commercial carrier to Chief, National
Appeals Office, 1315 East-West Hwy.,
Room 9552, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
(e) Time limitations. A petition must
be filed within 45 days after the date the
initial administrative determination is
issued unless a shorter or longer filing
timeframe is explicitly specified in the
regulations governing the initial
administrative determination.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jun 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
33983
(f) Agency record. (1) Within 20 days
of receipt of the copy of the petition to
appeal, the office that issued the initial
administrative determination that is the
subject of the appeal shall transmit the
agency record to NAO.
(2) The office that issued the initial
administrative determination shall
organize the pages of the agency record
in chronological order.
(g) Agency participation in appeal.
The office responsible for the initial
administrative determination shall have
20 days from the date it receives a copy
of the petition to appeal to provide NAO
with written notice that it will be a
party to the appeal.
Service of documents may be made by
first class mail (postage prepaid),
facsimile, or commercial carrier, or by
personal delivery to a party’s address of
record.
(2) Service of documents will be
considered effective upon the date of
postmark (or as otherwise shown for
government-franked mail), facsimile
transmission, delivery to a commercial
carrier, or upon personal delivery.
(b) A party shall serve a copy of all
documents to all other parties and shall
file a copy of all documents with NAO
the same business day.
(c) NAO may serve documents by
electronic mail.
§ 906.4
§ 906.6
General filing requirements.
(a) Date of filing. Filing refers to
providing documents to NAO.
(1) All documents filed on behalf of
an appellant or related to an appeal
shall be submitted to NAO via facsimile.
(2) If the person filing does not have
access to a fax machine, he or she may
file by regular mail or commercial
carrier to Chief, National Appeals
Office, 1315 East-West Hwy., Room
9552, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
(3) A document transmitted to NAO is
considered filed upon receipt of the
entire submission by 5 p.m. Eastern
Time at NAO.
(b) Copies. At the time of filing a
submission to NAO, the filing party
shall serve a copy thereof on every other
party, unless otherwise provided for in
these rules.
(c) Retention. All submissions to NAO
become part of a NAO case record.
(d) Computation of time. When
computing any time period specified
under these rules, count every day,
including intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal holidays. If the date
that ordinarily would be the last day for
filing with NAO falls on a Saturday,
Sunday, or Federal holiday, or a day
NAO is closed, the filing period will
include the first NAO workday after that
date.
(e) Extension of time. (1) When a
submission is required to be filed within
a prescribed time, a party may request,
in writing, an extension of time to file
the submission, citing the specific
reason or reasons for the need of an
extension of time. A party may not
request an extension of time to file the
submission after the deadline to file the
submission has passed.
(2) NAO may grant the extension if an
appellate officer determines good cause
for an extension of time has been
established by the party.
§ 906.5
Service.
(a) Service refers to providing
documents to parties to an appeal. (1)
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Ex parte communications.
(a) Communication with NAO,
including appellate officers, concerning
procedures, scheduling, and status is
permissible.
(b) Ex parte communication between
NAO and the parties about the merits of
a pending appeal is not permissible
unless all parties have been given
reasonable notice and an opportunity to
participate in the communication.
(c) If NAO receives an ex parte
communication, NAO shall document
the communication and any responses
thereto in the NAO case record. If the ex
parte communication was in writing,
NAO shall place a copy of the
communication in the NAO case record.
If the ex parte communication was oral,
NAO shall prepare a memorandum
stating the substance of the oral
communication, which will then be
included in the NAO case record. NAO
will provide copies of any such
materials included in the NAO case
record under this paragraph to the
parties to the appeal.
(d) NAO may require a party to show
cause why such party’s claim or interest
in the appeal should not be dismissed,
denied, disregarded, or otherwise
adversely affected because of an ex parte
communication as described in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(e) This rule may be suspended by
NAO during an alternative dispute
resolution process.
§ 906.7 Disqualification of appellate
officer.
(a) An appellate officer shall
disqualify him or herself if the appellate
officer has a perceived or actual conflict
of interest, a perceived or actual
prejudice or bias, for other ethical
reasons, or based on principles found in
the American Bar Association Model
Code of Judicial Conduct for
Administrative Law Judges.
(b) Any party may request an
appellate officer, at any time before the
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
33984
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
filing of the appellate officer’s decision,
to withdraw on the ground of personal
bias or disqualification, by filing a
written motion with the appellate
officer setting forth in detail the matters
alleged to constitute grounds for
disqualification.
(c) The appellate officer, orally or in
writing, shall grant or deny the motion
based on the American Bar Association
Model Code of Judicial Conduct for
Federal Administrative Law Judges and
other applicable law or policy. If the
motion is granted, the appellate officer
will disqualify himself or herself and
withdraw from the proceeding. If the
motion is denied, the appellate officer
will state the grounds for his or her
ruling and proceed with his or her
review.
§ 906.8 Scheduling and pre-hearing
conferences.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(a) NAO may convene a scheduling
and/or pre-hearing conference if, for
example, an appellate officer in his or
her discretion finds a conference will
materially advance the proceeding.
(b) NAO shall notify the parties in
writing 10 days prior to a conference
unless the Chief of NAO orders a shorter
period of time for providing notice or
conducting a conference.
(c) The following will guide an
appellate officer in determining whether
to exercise his or her discretion to hold
a scheduling and/or pre-hearing
conference.
(1) Settlement, if possible under
applicable law;
(2) Clarifying the issues under review;
(3) Stipulations;
(4) Hearing(s) date, time, and location;
(5) Identifying witnesses for the
hearing(s);
(6) Development of the NAO case
record, and;
(7) Other matters that may aid in the
disposition of the proceedings.
(d) NAO may record the conference.
(e) Format. At the discretion of the
appellate officer, conferences may be
conducted by telephone, in person, or
by teleconference or similar electronic
means.
(f) NAO may issue an order showing
the matters disposed of in the
conference and may include in the order
other matters related to the appeal.
§ 906.9
Exhibits.
(a) The parties shall mark all exhibits
in consecutive order in whole Arabic
numbers and with a designation
identifying the party submitting the
exhibit(s).
(b) Parties shall exchange all exhibits
that will be offered at the hearing at
least 10 days before the hearing.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jun 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
(c) Parties shall provide all exhibit(s)
to NAO at least 10 days before the
hearing.
(d) NAO may modify the timeframe
for exchanging or submitting exhibits if
an appellate officer determines good
cause exists.
(e) NAO may deny the admission into
evidence of exhibits that are not marked
and exchanged pursuant to this rule.
(f) Each exhibit offered in evidence or
marked for identification shall be filed
and retained in the NAO case record.
§ 906.10
Evidence.
(a) The Federal Rules of Evidence do
not apply to NAO proceedings.
(b) NAO will decide whether to admit
evidence into the NAO case record.
(1) An appellate officer may exclude
unduly repetitious, irrelevant, and
immaterial evidence. An appellate
officer may also exclude evidence to
avoid undue prejudice, confusion of the
issues, undue delay, waste of time, or
needless presentation of cumulative
evidence.
(2) An appellate officer may consider
hearsay evidence.
(c) Copies of documents may be
offered as evidence, provided they are of
equal legibility and quality as the
originals, and such copies shall have the
same force and effect as if they were
originals. If an appellate officer so
directs, a party shall submit original
documents to the appellate officer.
(d) An appellate officer may take
official notice of Federal or State public
records and of any matter of which
courts may take judicial notice.
(e) An appellate officer may contact
the program office that issued the initial
administrative determination in the case
before the appellate officer in order to
obtain the interpretation(s) of the law
and regulation(s) made by the program
office and applied to the facts in the
case. The program office will provide to
NAO the interpretation(s) of the law and
regulation(s) made by that office in the
case.
§ 906.11
Hearing.
(a) Procedures. (1) An appellate
officer in his or her discretion may order
a hearing taking into account the
information provided by an Appellant
pursuant to § 906.3(b)(3) or if an
appellate officer considers that a hearing
will materially advance his or her
evaluation of the issues under appeal. In
exercising his or her discretion, an
appellate officer may consider whether
oral testimony is required to resolve a
material issue of fact or whether oral
presentation is needed to probe a party’s
position on a material issue of law. If an
appellate officer determines that a
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
hearing is not necessary, then the
appellate officer will base his or her
decision on the NAO case record. In the
absence of a hearing an appellate officer
may, at his or her discretion, permit the
parties to submit additional materials
for consideration.
(2) If an appellate officer convenes a
hearing, the hearing will be conducted
in the manner determined by NAO most
likely to obtain the facts relevant to the
matter or matters at issue.
(3) NAO shall schedule the date, time
and place for the hearing. NAO will
notify the parties in writing of the
hearing date, time and place at least 10
days prior to the hearing unless the
Chief of NAO orders a shorter period for
providing notice or conducting the
hearing.
(4) At the hearing, all testimony will
be under oath or affirmation
administered by an appellate officer. In
the event a party or a witness refuses to
be sworn or refuses to answer a
question, an appellate officer may state
for the record any inference drawn from
such refusal.
(5) An appellate officer may question
the parties and the witnesses.
(6) An appellate officer will allow
time for parties to present argument,
question witnesses and other parties,
and introduce evidence.
(7) Parties may not compel discovery
or the testimony of any witness.
(b) Recording. An appellate officer
may record the hearing.
(c) Format. At the discretion of NAO,
hearings may be conducted by
telephone, in person, or by
teleconference or similar electronic
means.
§ 906.12 Closing the evidentiary portion of
the NAO case record.
(a) At the conclusion of the NAO
proceedings, an appellate officer will
establish the date upon which the
evidentiary portion of the NAO case
record will close. Once an appellate
officer closes the evidentiary portion of
the NAO case record, with or without a
hearing, no further submissions or
argument will be accepted into the NAO
case record.
(b) NAO in its discretion may reopen
the evidentiary portion of the NAO case
record or request additional information
from the parties at anytime.
§ 906.13
Failure to appear.
If any party fails to appear at a prehearing conference or hearing after
proper notice, an appellate officer may:
(a) Dismiss the case, or;
(b) Deem the failure of a party to
appear after proper notice a waiver of
any right to a hearing and consent to the
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
making of a decision based on the NAO
case record.
§ 906.14
Burden of proof.
On issues of fact, the appellant bears
the burden of proving he or she should
prevail by a preponderance of the
evidence. Preponderance of the
evidence is the relevant evidence in the
NAO case record, considered as a
whole, that a reasonable person would
accept as sufficient to find a contested
fact is more likely than not. Appellant
has the obligation to obtain and present
evidence to support the claims in his or
her petition.
§ 906.15
Decisions.
(a) After an appellate officer closes the
evidentiary portion of the NAO case
record, NAO will issue a written
decision that is based on the NAO case
record. In making a decision, NAO shall
determine whether the appellant has
shown by a preponderance of the
evidence that the initial administrative
determination is inconsistent with
applicable laws and regulations. In
making a decision, NAO shall give
deference to the reasonable
interpretation(s) of applicable
ambiguous laws and regulations made
by the office issuing in the initial
administrative determination.
(b) At any time before a decision is
implemented pursuant to § 906.18, NAO
may issue a corrected decision.
(c) NAO shall serve a copy of its
decision upon the appellant and the
Regional Administrator.
(d) Except as provided in §§ 906.16
and 906.17, NAO’s decision takes effect
30 days after the date it is issued and,
upon taking effect, is the final decision
of the Department for the purposes of
judicial review.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 906.16
Reconsideration.
(a) Any party may file a motion for
reconsideration of NAO’s decision. The
request must be filed with NAO within
10 calendar days after service of NAO’s
decision.
(b) The motion must be in writing and
contain a detailed statement of an error
of fact or law material to the decision.
(c) If an appellate officer grants the
motion for reconsideration, then NAO
will stay the effective date of its
decision under reconsideration review.
(d) In response to a motion for
reconsideration, NAO will either:
(1) Reject the motion because it does
not meet the criteria of paragraph (a) or
(b) of this section; or
(2) Issue a revised decision which will
take effect 30 days after it is issued and
is the final decision of the Department
for the purposes of judicial review,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Jun 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
unless the Regional Administrator
remands, reverses or modifies it
pursuant to § 906.17.
§ 906.17 Review by the Regional
Administrator.
(a) Regional Administrator authority
and procedures. (1) A decision issued
pursuant to § 906.15 or revised decision
issued pursuant to § 906.16 is subject to
review by the Regional Administrator.
After 10 days of the date of the decision
issued by NAO, the Regional
Administrator may remand, reverse, or
modify NAO’s decision. In reviewing
NAO’s findings of fact, the Regional
Administrator may only consider the
evidentiary record including arguments,
claims, evidence of record and other
documents of record which were before
NAO when it rendered its decision.
(2) The Regional Administrator must
provide a written decision explaining
why NAO’s decision has been
remanded, reversed, or modified. The
Regional Administrator must serve a
copy of the remanded, reversed or
modified decision on NAO and the
appellant promptly.
(b) The Regional Administrator’s
written decision to reverse or modify
NAO’s decision is the final decision of
the Department for the purposes of
judicial review.
(c) If the Regional Administrator does
not remand, reverse, or modify NAO’s
decision under paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section, NAO’s decision is the final
decision of the Department for the
purposes of judicial review.
§ 906.18
Implementation of final decisions.
The final decision shall be
implemented by the office that issued
the initial administrative determination
within 30 days after issuance of the final
decision to the extent practicable and
consistent with program regulations.
[FR Doc. 2012–13979 Filed 6–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2012–0004; Notice No.
129]
RIN 1513–AB46
Proposed Establishment of the Indiana
Uplands Viticultural Area and
Modification of the Ohio River Valley
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
33985
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
establish the approximately 4,800square mile ‘‘Indiana Uplands’’
viticultural area in south-central Indiana
and proposes to modify the boundary of
the established Ohio River Valley
viticultural area, which would result in
the elimination of a potential overlap
with the proposed Indiana Uplands
viticultural area. These proposals would
result in an approximately 1,530 square
mile region no longer being part of the
Ohio River Valley viticultural area as
the affected region would be included in
the new Indiana Uplands viticultural
area. TTB designates viticultural areas
to allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they
may purchase. TTB invites comments
on these proposals.
DATES: TTB must receive written
comments on or before August 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on
this notice to one of the following
addresses:
• https://www.regulations.gov (via the
online comment form for this notice as
posted within Docket No. TTB–2012–
0004 at ‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the Federal
e-rulemaking portal);
• U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044–4412; or
• Hand delivery/courier in lieu of
mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite
200E, Washington, DC 20005.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing.
You may view copies of this notice,
selected supporting materials, and any
comments TTB receives about this
proposal at https://www.regulations.gov
within Docket No. TTB–2012–0004. A
direct link to this docket is posted on
the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/
wine/wine_rulemaking.shtml under
Notice No. 129. You also may view
copies of this notice, all related
petitions, maps or other supporting
materials, and any comments TTB
receives about this proposal by
appointment at the TTB Information
Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. Please call 202–
453–2270 to make an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elisabeth C. Kann, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G St. NW.,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33980-33985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13979]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 906
[Docket. No 101019524-2112-01]
RIN 0648-BA36
National Appeals Office Rules of Procedure
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish procedures governing the
National Appeals Office (NAO), a division of NMFS' Office of Management
and Budget within NOAA. NAO's central mission is to provide an
efficient means of adjudicating appeals by providing due process and
consistency to NMFS' administrative decisions. This proposed rule would
establish a process by which NMFS could review, and if necessary
correct, decisions about certain limited access privilege programs
under Section 303A of the Magnuson-Steven Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. The proposed procedures could also be used to
adjudicate appeals from other offices that incorporate these rules into
their regulations or otherwise notify potential appellants of the
procedures' applicability to their proceedings.
DATES: NMFS invites interested persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule. To ensure consideration, comments must be in writing and
must be received by July 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2011-0266,
by one of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. To
submit comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal, first click the ``submit a
comment'' icon, then enter NOAA-NMFS-2011-0266 in the keyword search.
Locate the document you wish to comment on from the resulting list and
click on the ``Submit a Comment'' icon on the right of that line.
Mail: Submit written comments to Steven Goodman, National
Appeals Office, Office of Management and Budget, NMFS, 1315 East West
Hwy., Room 9553, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Fax: 301-713-2384; Attn: Steven Goodman.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above methods to
ensure that the comments are received, documented, and considered by
NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are a part of the public record and
will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted
in Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats
only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Goodman, National Appeals
Office, Office of Management & Budget, NMFS, 1315 East West Hwy., Room
9553, Silver Spring, MD 20910; nmfs.nao.contact@noaa.gov; (301) 427-
8774. (This is not a toll-free number.) Individuals with hearing or
speech impairments may access the telephone number above via TTY by
calling the Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In 2007, Congress added section 303A to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA). Section 303A authorizes
limited access privilege programs (LAPP) and requires NMFS to ``include
an appeals process for administrative review of the Secretary's
decisions regarding initial
[[Page 33981]]
allocation of limited access privileges.'' Most of the appeals
processes currently used by NMFS pre-date the new MSA requirement.
Further, the current infrastructure for LAPP appeals does not achieve
optimum economies of scale, or efficient use of resources.
LAPPs may provide benefits to certain members of the public, while
excluding others. Thus, a transparent, unbiased and clear appeals
process is essential. LAPP applicants across the country should be
provided with a uniform level of due process and consistent procedures
for filing and deciding appeals. Further, a robust administrative
appeals process provides a means for an agency to make corrections and
avoid costly litigation. Accordingly, NMFS is proposing to adopt
procedural regulations at 15 CFR part 906, which would designate NAO, a
division within NMFS Office of Management and Budget, as adjudicator
for all future appeals arising under section 303A of the MSA. NAO may
also be used for other Department of Commerce adjudications if the
proposed regulations are adopted by regulation or other means and
potential appellants are given notice. For example, other programs that
may opt into the NAO process may include the Alaska Charter Halibut
Limited Access Program or the North Pacific Groundfish Observer
Program.
NAO adjudicates initial administrative determinations, defined in
the proposed rule as agency actions that directly and adversely affect
an appellant. Typically, although not exclusively, NAO proceedings are
for appeals of denials of permits or other limited access privileges.
The proposed rule does not encompass proceedings made available
pursuant to 15 CFR part 904. The regulations at 15 CFR part 904 are for
administrative proceedings over cases involving a Notice of Violation
and Assessment of civil penalty, permit sanctions, written warnings, or
seizure and forfeiture of property for violating 34 statutes NOAA
enforces. The regulations codified at 15 CFR part 904 provide distinct
procedures, including a different administrative process that includes
the agency as a party to an appeal.
The proposed action should avoid future unnecessary costs and
redundancies through a centralized administrative appeals process for
review of initial administrative determinations. A centralized system
for adjudicating appeals is more cost effective than duplicating the
appeals function in each region. Historically, administrative appeals
were processed by NMFS' regional offices. Each NMFS region has had a
different structure and process for resolving appeals.
The proposed action will promote consistency in decision making and
responsiveness to due process considerations. A centralized office will
use experienced, full-time adjudicators to decide appeals, and programs
would benefit from their collective experience and institutional
memory. A cadre of experienced and well-trained appellate officers
would free other employees to use their time performing duties within
their area of expertise. Under the current proposal, NAO could
adjudicate appeals in one location. This will allow for economies of
scale and freeing-up of resources for use in regional offices.
Typically, NAO will be used for informal administrative appeals.
The proposed rule allows flexibility in determining what type and how
many pre-hearing conferences are needed. An appellate officer has the
discretion to hold a scheduling and/or pre-hearing conference if he or
she thinks one is needed to materially advance the proceeding. An
appellate officer's discretion in determining whether to hold a
scheduling and/or pre-hearing conference will be guided by the
following: settlement, if allowed under applicable law; clarification
of the issues under review; stipulations; hearing(s) date, time, and
location; identification of witnesses for the hearing(s); development
of the NAO case record, and; other matters that may aid in the
disposition of the proceedings.
Hearings are also held at the discretion of an appellate officer or
if the appellate officer considers such hearing will materially advance
his or her evaluation of the issues under appeal. In determining
whether to hold a hearing, an appellate officer's discretion will be
guided by whether the appellate officer believes oral testimony is
required to resolve a material issue of fact or whether oral
presentation is needed to probe a party's position on a material issue
of law. Conferences and hearings may be in person, but more likely,
they will be held by telephone or by other electronic means. The rule
does not bar face-to-face hearings, but it is not intended to require
expenditure of funds in order for an appellant to participate, or at
its discretion, the agency to participate, in a hearing.
The proposed regulations address operations as well as events that
occur during the course of adjudicating an appeal filed with NAO. The
proposed rule provides who may file, how and when to initiate an
appeal, and what constitutes the agency record and transmittal for
inclusion in the NAO case record for the appeal. During a hearing and
while the record is open, the appellate officer determines whether
additional evidence should be admitted in the NAO case record. The
proposed rule prohibits ex parte communications, but clarifies that
non-substantive communications or communications about procedural
matters are permissible. The proposed rule establishes time frames and
deadlines for actions to ensure a reasonably expeditious review, and
while that may be modified, that would not be the norm.
NAO will produce written decisions upholding or reversing the
administrative determination under review. The proposed rule
establishes parameters for written decisions. The appellant has the
burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she
should prevail. Thus it is incumbent upon the appellant to garner and
present evidence to support his or her claim.
Generally, under the proposed rule a decision issued by NAO becomes
final 30 days after issuance. The effective date of the final decision
is subject to delay for reconsideration by NAO, or review by a Regional
Administrator of NMFS or other appropriate official. NAO will follow
applicable federal law and policy which may include publishing NAO and
Regional Administrator decisions on NAO's Web site.
Classifications
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This regulation does not create any new regulatory requirements, but
instead codifies procedural rules for certain administrative
adjudication proceedings. The proposed rule would not create any new
obligations for small entities; rather, it would ensure a standardized
and centralized appeals process for decisions regarding initial
allocation of limited access privileges. As a result, any potential
economic impact on small entities would be nominal. While it is
possible that a substantial number of small entities could participate
in the adjudication proceedings, the procedures being established here
would not have a significant economic impact on those entities.
Implementing standardized rules could actually reduce the
[[Page 33982]]
economic burden on small entities by providing procedural certainty to
the parties participating in the proceedings.
Because this proposed rule, if enacted, would not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 906
Administrative appeals, Administrative practice and procedure,
Fisheries.
Dated: June 4, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
For reasons stated in the preamble, NMFS proposes to add 15 CFR
part 906 as follows:
PART 906--NATIONAL APPEALS OFFICE RULES OF PROCEDURE
Sec.
906.1 Purpose and scope.
906.2 Definitions.
906.3 Requesting an appeal and agency record.
906.4 General filing requirements.
906.5 Service.
906.6 Ex parte communications.
906.7 Disqualification of appellate officer.
906.8 Scheduling and pre-hearing conferences.
906.9 Exhibits.
906.10 Evidence.
906.11 Hearing.
906.12 Closing the evidentiary portion of the NAO case record.
906.13 Failure to appear.
906.14 Burden of proof.
906.15 Decisions.
906.16 Reconsideration.
906.17 Review by the Regional Administrator.
906.18 Implementation of final decisions.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1374, 1375 & 1416;
16 U.S.C. 1540; 16 U.S.C. 773f; 16 U.S.C. 973f; 16 U.S.C. 1174; 16
U.S.C. 2437; 16 U.S.C. 4013; 16 U.S.C. 5507; 16 U.S.C. 7009; 16
U.S.C. 3637; 16 U.S.C. 5103 & 5106; 16 U.S.C. 5154 & 5158; 16 U.S.C.
6905, and; 16 U.S.C. 5010.
Sec. 906.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) This part sets forth the procedures governing proceedings
before the National Appeals Office (NAO). These procedures provide
standard rules of practice for administrative adjudications by NAO.
(b) NAO will adjudicate appeals of initial administrative
determinations in limited access privilege programs developed under
section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA) and approved after the effective date of these
regulations. Those appeals are informal proceedings.
(c) The procedures contained in this part may be incorporated by
reference in rules or regulations other than those promulgated pursuant
to section 303A of the MSA. The Secretary may also request that NAO
adjudicate appeals in any matter in controversy that requires findings
of fact and conclusions of law, and other quasi-judicial matters that
the Secretary deems appropriate, consistent with existing regulations.
The Secretary shall provide notice to potential appellants and to any
affected party in these other matters through regulations or actual
notice.
Sec. 906.2 Definitions.
Agency record means all material and information, including
electronic, the office that issued the initial administrative
determination relied on or considered in reaching its decision, or
which otherwise is related to the initial administrative determination.
Appeal means an appellant's petition to appeal an initial
administrative determination and all administrative processes of the
National Appeals Office related thereto.
Appellant means a person who receives an initial administrative
determination and appeals it to the National Appeals Office.
Appellate officer means an individual designated by the Chief of
the National Appeals Office to adjudicate the appeal. The term may
include the Chief of the National Appeals Office.
Day means calendar day unless otherwise specified by the Chief of
the National Appeals Office. When computing any time period specified
under these rules, count every day, including intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal holidays.
Department or DOC means the Department of Commerce.
Ex parte communication means any oral or written communication
about the merits of a pending appeal between one party and the National
Appeals Office with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all
parties is not given. However, ex parte communication does not include
inquiries regarding procedures, scheduling, and status.
Initial Administrative Determination or IAD means a determination
made by an official of the National Marine Fisheries Services that
directly and adversely affects a person's ability to hold, acquire,
use, or be issued a limited access privilege. The term also includes
determinations issued pursuant to other federal law, for which review
has been assigned to the National Appeals Office by the Secretary.
NAO means the National Appeals Office, an adjudicatory body within
the Office of Management and Budget, National Marine Fisheries Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of
Commerce. The term generally means all NAO personnel, including
appellate officers.
NAO case record means the Agency record and all additional
documents and other materials related to an appeal and maintained by
NAO in a case file.
NMFS means the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or NOAA means the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of
Commerce.
Party means a person who files a petition for appeal with NAO. It
can also mean an office that issued the IAD if that office participates
in the NAO appeal.
Person means any individual (whether or not a citizen or national
of the United States), corporation, partnership, association, or other
entity (whether or not organized or existing under the laws of any
State), and any Federal, State, or local, or foreign government or
entity of any such government.
Regional Administrator means the administrator of one of six
regions of NMFS: Northeast, Southeast, Northwest, Southwest, Alaska, or
Pacific Islands. The term also includes an official with similar
authority within the DOC, such as the Director of NMFS' Office of
Sustainable Fisheries.
Representative means an individual properly authorized by an
Appellant in writing to act for the Appellant in conjunction with an
appeal pending in NAO. The representative does not need to be a
licensed attorney.
Secretary means the Secretary of Commerce or a designee.
Sec. 906.3 Requesting an appeal and agency record.
(a) Who May File. Any person who receives an initial administrative
determination.
(b) Petition to Appeal. (1) To request an appeal, a person shall
submit a written petition of appeal to NAO.
(2) The petition shall include a copy of the initial administrative
determination the person wishes to appeal.
[[Page 33983]]
(3) In the petition, the person shall state how the initial
administrative determination directly and adversely affects him or her,
why he or she believes the initial administrative determination is
wrong, and whether he or she requests a hearing or prefers that an
appellate officer make a decision based on the NAO case record and
without a hearing.
(i) Arguments not raised by the person in his or her petition to
appeal will be deemed waived.
(ii) The petition may include additional documentation in support
of the appeal.
(4) If a person requests a hearing, the written request must
include a concise statement raising genuine and substantial issues of a
material fact or law that cannot be resolved based on the documentary
evidence.
(5) In the petition, a person shall state whether the person has a
representative, and if so, the name, address, and telephone number for
the representative.
(c) Address of record. In the petition the person shall identify
the address of record. Documents directed to the appellant will be
mailed to the address of record, unless the appellant provides NAO and
other parties with any changes to his or her address in writing.
(1) The address of record may include a representative's address.
(2) NAO bears no responsibility if the appellant or his or her
representative does not receive documents because appellant or his or
her representative changes his or her address without proper
notification to NAO.
(3) NAO bears no responsibility if the appellant or his or her
representative fail to retrieve documents upon notification from the
United States Postal Service or commercial carrier.
(4) NAO will presume that documents addressed to an address of
record and properly mailed or given to a commercial carrier for
delivery are received.
(d) Place of filing. The petition must be transmitted via
facsimile. The facsimile number is: 301-713-2384. If the person filing
the petition does not have access to a fax machine, he or she may file
the petition by mail or commercial carrier to Chief, National Appeals
Office, 1315 East-West Hwy., Room 9552, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
(e) Time limitations. A petition must be filed within 45 days after
the date the initial administrative determination is issued unless a
shorter or longer filing timeframe is explicitly specified in the
regulations governing the initial administrative determination.
(f) Agency record. (1) Within 20 days of receipt of the copy of the
petition to appeal, the office that issued the initial administrative
determination that is the subject of the appeal shall transmit the
agency record to NAO.
(2) The office that issued the initial administrative determination
shall organize the pages of the agency record in chronological order.
(g) Agency participation in appeal. The office responsible for the
initial administrative determination shall have 20 days from the date
it receives a copy of the petition to appeal to provide NAO with
written notice that it will be a party to the appeal.
Sec. 906.4 General filing requirements.
(a) Date of filing. Filing refers to providing documents to NAO.
(1) All documents filed on behalf of an appellant or related to an
appeal shall be submitted to NAO via facsimile.
(2) If the person filing does not have access to a fax machine, he
or she may file by regular mail or commercial carrier to Chief,
National Appeals Office, 1315 East-West Hwy., Room 9552, Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
(3) A document transmitted to NAO is considered filed upon receipt
of the entire submission by 5 p.m. Eastern Time at NAO.
(b) Copies. At the time of filing a submission to NAO, the filing
party shall serve a copy thereof on every other party, unless otherwise
provided for in these rules.
(c) Retention. All submissions to NAO become part of a NAO case
record.
(d) Computation of time. When computing any time period specified
under these rules, count every day, including intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal holidays. If the date that ordinarily would be the
last day for filing with NAO falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal
holiday, or a day NAO is closed, the filing period will include the
first NAO workday after that date.
(e) Extension of time. (1) When a submission is required to be
filed within a prescribed time, a party may request, in writing, an
extension of time to file the submission, citing the specific reason or
reasons for the need of an extension of time. A party may not request
an extension of time to file the submission after the deadline to file
the submission has passed.
(2) NAO may grant the extension if an appellate officer determines
good cause for an extension of time has been established by the party.
Sec. 906.5 Service.
(a) Service refers to providing documents to parties to an appeal.
(1) Service of documents may be made by first class mail (postage
prepaid), facsimile, or commercial carrier, or by personal delivery to
a party's address of record.
(2) Service of documents will be considered effective upon the date
of postmark (or as otherwise shown for government-franked mail),
facsimile transmission, delivery to a commercial carrier, or upon
personal delivery.
(b) A party shall serve a copy of all documents to all other
parties and shall file a copy of all documents with NAO the same
business day.
(c) NAO may serve documents by electronic mail.
Sec. 906.6 Ex parte communications.
(a) Communication with NAO, including appellate officers,
concerning procedures, scheduling, and status is permissible.
(b) Ex parte communication between NAO and the parties about the
merits of a pending appeal is not permissible unless all parties have
been given reasonable notice and an opportunity to participate in the
communication.
(c) If NAO receives an ex parte communication, NAO shall document
the communication and any responses thereto in the NAO case record. If
the ex parte communication was in writing, NAO shall place a copy of
the communication in the NAO case record. If the ex parte communication
was oral, NAO shall prepare a memorandum stating the substance of the
oral communication, which will then be included in the NAO case record.
NAO will provide copies of any such materials included in the NAO case
record under this paragraph to the parties to the appeal.
(d) NAO may require a party to show cause why such party's claim or
interest in the appeal should not be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or
otherwise adversely affected because of an ex parte communication as
described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(e) This rule may be suspended by NAO during an alternative dispute
resolution process.
Sec. 906.7 Disqualification of appellate officer.
(a) An appellate officer shall disqualify him or herself if the
appellate officer has a perceived or actual conflict of interest, a
perceived or actual prejudice or bias, for other ethical reasons, or
based on principles found in the American Bar Association Model Code of
Judicial Conduct for Administrative Law Judges.
(b) Any party may request an appellate officer, at any time before
the
[[Page 33984]]
filing of the appellate officer's decision, to withdraw on the ground
of personal bias or disqualification, by filing a written motion with
the appellate officer setting forth in detail the matters alleged to
constitute grounds for disqualification.
(c) The appellate officer, orally or in writing, shall grant or
deny the motion based on the American Bar Association Model Code of
Judicial Conduct for Federal Administrative Law Judges and other
applicable law or policy. If the motion is granted, the appellate
officer will disqualify himself or herself and withdraw from the
proceeding. If the motion is denied, the appellate officer will state
the grounds for his or her ruling and proceed with his or her review.
Sec. 906.8 Scheduling and pre-hearing conferences.
(a) NAO may convene a scheduling and/or pre-hearing conference if,
for example, an appellate officer in his or her discretion finds a
conference will materially advance the proceeding.
(b) NAO shall notify the parties in writing 10 days prior to a
conference unless the Chief of NAO orders a shorter period of time for
providing notice or conducting a conference.
(c) The following will guide an appellate officer in determining
whether to exercise his or her discretion to hold a scheduling and/or
pre-hearing conference.
(1) Settlement, if possible under applicable law;
(2) Clarifying the issues under review;
(3) Stipulations;
(4) Hearing(s) date, time, and location;
(5) Identifying witnesses for the hearing(s);
(6) Development of the NAO case record, and;
(7) Other matters that may aid in the disposition of the
proceedings.
(d) NAO may record the conference.
(e) Format. At the discretion of the appellate officer, conferences
may be conducted by telephone, in person, or by teleconference or
similar electronic means.
(f) NAO may issue an order showing the matters disposed of in the
conference and may include in the order other matters related to the
appeal.
Sec. 906.9 Exhibits.
(a) The parties shall mark all exhibits in consecutive order in
whole Arabic numbers and with a designation identifying the party
submitting the exhibit(s).
(b) Parties shall exchange all exhibits that will be offered at the
hearing at least 10 days before the hearing.
(c) Parties shall provide all exhibit(s) to NAO at least 10 days
before the hearing.
(d) NAO may modify the timeframe for exchanging or submitting
exhibits if an appellate officer determines good cause exists.
(e) NAO may deny the admission into evidence of exhibits that are
not marked and exchanged pursuant to this rule.
(f) Each exhibit offered in evidence or marked for identification
shall be filed and retained in the NAO case record.
Sec. 906.10 Evidence.
(a) The Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply to NAO proceedings.
(b) NAO will decide whether to admit evidence into the NAO case
record.
(1) An appellate officer may exclude unduly repetitious,
irrelevant, and immaterial evidence. An appellate officer may also
exclude evidence to avoid undue prejudice, confusion of the issues,
undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative
evidence.
(2) An appellate officer may consider hearsay evidence.
(c) Copies of documents may be offered as evidence, provided they
are of equal legibility and quality as the originals, and such copies
shall have the same force and effect as if they were originals. If an
appellate officer so directs, a party shall submit original documents
to the appellate officer.
(d) An appellate officer may take official notice of Federal or
State public records and of any matter of which courts may take
judicial notice.
(e) An appellate officer may contact the program office that issued
the initial administrative determination in the case before the
appellate officer in order to obtain the interpretation(s) of the law
and regulation(s) made by the program office and applied to the facts
in the case. The program office will provide to NAO the
interpretation(s) of the law and regulation(s) made by that office in
the case.
Sec. 906.11 Hearing.
(a) Procedures. (1) An appellate officer in his or her discretion
may order a hearing taking into account the information provided by an
Appellant pursuant to Sec. 906.3(b)(3) or if an appellate officer
considers that a hearing will materially advance his or her evaluation
of the issues under appeal. In exercising his or her discretion, an
appellate officer may consider whether oral testimony is required to
resolve a material issue of fact or whether oral presentation is needed
to probe a party's position on a material issue of law. If an appellate
officer determines that a hearing is not necessary, then the appellate
officer will base his or her decision on the NAO case record. In the
absence of a hearing an appellate officer may, at his or her
discretion, permit the parties to submit additional materials for
consideration.
(2) If an appellate officer convenes a hearing, the hearing will be
conducted in the manner determined by NAO most likely to obtain the
facts relevant to the matter or matters at issue.
(3) NAO shall schedule the date, time and place for the hearing.
NAO will notify the parties in writing of the hearing date, time and
place at least 10 days prior to the hearing unless the Chief of NAO
orders a shorter period for providing notice or conducting the hearing.
(4) At the hearing, all testimony will be under oath or affirmation
administered by an appellate officer. In the event a party or a witness
refuses to be sworn or refuses to answer a question, an appellate
officer may state for the record any inference drawn from such refusal.
(5) An appellate officer may question the parties and the
witnesses.
(6) An appellate officer will allow time for parties to present
argument, question witnesses and other parties, and introduce evidence.
(7) Parties may not compel discovery or the testimony of any
witness.
(b) Recording. An appellate officer may record the hearing.
(c) Format. At the discretion of NAO, hearings may be conducted by
telephone, in person, or by teleconference or similar electronic means.
Sec. 906.12 Closing the evidentiary portion of the NAO case record.
(a) At the conclusion of the NAO proceedings, an appellate officer
will establish the date upon which the evidentiary portion of the NAO
case record will close. Once an appellate officer closes the
evidentiary portion of the NAO case record, with or without a hearing,
no further submissions or argument will be accepted into the NAO case
record.
(b) NAO in its discretion may reopen the evidentiary portion of the
NAO case record or request additional information from the parties at
anytime.
Sec. 906.13 Failure to appear.
If any party fails to appear at a pre-hearing conference or hearing
after proper notice, an appellate officer may:
(a) Dismiss the case, or;
(b) Deem the failure of a party to appear after proper notice a
waiver of any right to a hearing and consent to the
[[Page 33985]]
making of a decision based on the NAO case record.
Sec. 906.14 Burden of proof.
On issues of fact, the appellant bears the burden of proving he or
she should prevail by a preponderance of the evidence. Preponderance of
the evidence is the relevant evidence in the NAO case record,
considered as a whole, that a reasonable person would accept as
sufficient to find a contested fact is more likely than not. Appellant
has the obligation to obtain and present evidence to support the claims
in his or her petition.
Sec. 906.15 Decisions.
(a) After an appellate officer closes the evidentiary portion of
the NAO case record, NAO will issue a written decision that is based on
the NAO case record. In making a decision, NAO shall determine whether
the appellant has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the
initial administrative determination is inconsistent with applicable
laws and regulations. In making a decision, NAO shall give deference to
the reasonable interpretation(s) of applicable ambiguous laws and
regulations made by the office issuing in the initial administrative
determination.
(b) At any time before a decision is implemented pursuant to Sec.
906.18, NAO may issue a corrected decision.
(c) NAO shall serve a copy of its decision upon the appellant and
the Regional Administrator.
(d) Except as provided in Sec. Sec. 906.16 and 906.17, NAO's
decision takes effect 30 days after the date it is issued and, upon
taking effect, is the final decision of the Department for the purposes
of judicial review.
Sec. 906.16 Reconsideration.
(a) Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of NAO's
decision. The request must be filed with NAO within 10 calendar days
after service of NAO's decision.
(b) The motion must be in writing and contain a detailed statement
of an error of fact or law material to the decision.
(c) If an appellate officer grants the motion for reconsideration,
then NAO will stay the effective date of its decision under
reconsideration review.
(d) In response to a motion for reconsideration, NAO will either:
(1) Reject the motion because it does not meet the criteria of
paragraph (a) or (b) of this section; or
(2) Issue a revised decision which will take effect 30 days after
it is issued and is the final decision of the Department for the
purposes of judicial review, unless the Regional Administrator remands,
reverses or modifies it pursuant to Sec. 906.17.
Sec. 906.17 Review by the Regional Administrator.
(a) Regional Administrator authority and procedures. (1) A decision
issued pursuant to Sec. 906.15 or revised decision issued pursuant to
Sec. 906.16 is subject to review by the Regional Administrator. After
10 days of the date of the decision issued by NAO, the Regional
Administrator may remand, reverse, or modify NAO's decision. In
reviewing NAO's findings of fact, the Regional Administrator may only
consider the evidentiary record including arguments, claims, evidence
of record and other documents of record which were before NAO when it
rendered its decision.
(2) The Regional Administrator must provide a written decision
explaining why NAO's decision has been remanded, reversed, or modified.
The Regional Administrator must serve a copy of the remanded, reversed
or modified decision on NAO and the appellant promptly.
(b) The Regional Administrator's written decision to reverse or
modify NAO's decision is the final decision of the Department for the
purposes of judicial review.
(c) If the Regional Administrator does not remand, reverse, or
modify NAO's decision under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section,
NAO's decision is the final decision of the Department for the purposes
of judicial review.
Sec. 906.18 Implementation of final decisions.
The final decision shall be implemented by the office that issued
the initial administrative determination within 30 days after issuance
of the final decision to the extent practicable and consistent with
program regulations.
[FR Doc. 2012-13979 Filed 6-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P