Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request; Education and Human Resources Project Monitoring Clearance, 33774-33776 [2012-13820]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
33774
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2012 / Notices
to meet the 8.5% trigger threshold to
trigger ‘‘on’’ in Tier 4 of the EUC 2008
program. The 13 week mandatory ‘‘on’’
period in New York for Tier 4 of the
EUC program will begin June 4, 2012.
As a result, the current maximum
potential entitlement in the EUC
program will increase from 47 weeks to
53 weeks.
• States that are triggered ‘‘on’’ to Tier
4 of the EUC08 program, but not
triggered ‘‘on’’ to EB, may be eligible to
augment the entitlement for new Tier 4
claimants with a maximum potential
duration of 16 weeks. This ability to
augment the entitlement of new Tier 4
claimants concluded with the week
ending May 26, 2012. Starting May 27,
2012, all claimants exhausting Tier 3
who establish entitlement in Tier 4 will
only be eligible for up to 6 weeks of
benefits. Claimants who had previously
been augmented with 16 weeks of
benefits can continue to draw those
benefits. States currently affected by this
provision are Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky,
Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina,
Oregon, Puerto Rico, and South
Carolina.
Under Public Law 112–96, the current
total unemployment rate trigger
thresholds used to establish state
eligibility for the tiers of EUC are
scheduled to change. Currently, and
through the week ending May 26, 2012,
Tiers 1 and 2 do not require any specific
TUR trigger rate, Tier 3 requires a 6%
TUR trigger rate and Tier 4 requires an
8.5% TUR trigger rate. The current
trigger notices reflect state eligibility
under these TUR trigger rate thresholds.
With the week beginning May 27, the
following changes will take effect:
• Tier 1 will continue to be open to
all claimants with EUC eligibility, with
no changes.
• Tier 2 will require states to have at
least a 6% TUR trigger rate.
• Tier 3 will require states to have at
least a 7% TUR trigger rate.
• Tier 4 will require states to have at
least a 9% TUR trigger rate.
Because new unemployment rates
will not be released by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics before May 27, when
Public Law 112–96 causes changes in
the rates necessary to be ‘‘on’’ in certain
Tiers of EUC, states can now know with
certainty if they will have an ‘‘off’’
indicator in a Tier of EUC with the week
ending June 2.
• States that will be below the rate
necessary to remain on in Tier 2 under
the new 6% trigger threshold are: IA,
MN, NE., NH, ND, OK, SD, UT, VT, VA,
and WY. These states will have an ‘‘off’’
indicator in EUC Tier 2 with the week
ending June 2, 2012. The week ending
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
June 23, 2012 will be the last week in
which EUC claimants in those states
could exhaust Tier 1 and establish
eligibility in Tier 2. Under the phase-out
provisions, claimants could receive any
remaining entitlement they have in Tier
2 after June 23, 2012.
• States that will be below the rate
necessary to remain on in Tier 3 under
the new 7% trigger threshold are: DE,
HI, KS, MD, MA, MT, WV, and WI.
These states will have an ‘‘off’’ indicator
in EUC Tier 3 with the week ending
June 2, 2012. The week ending June 23,
2012 will be the last week in which EUC
claimants in those states could exhaust
Tier 2 and establish eligibility in Tier 3.
Under the phase-out provisions,
claimants could receive any remaining
entitlement they have in Tier 3 after
June 23, 2012.
• States that will be below the rate
necessary to remain on in Tier 4 under
the new 9% trigger threshold are: AZ,
IL, KY, MI, and OR. These states will
have an ‘‘off’’ indicator in EUC Tier 4
with the week ending June 2, 2012. The
week ending June 23, 2012 will be the
last week in which EUC claimants in
those states could exhaust Tier 3 and
establish eligibility in Tier 4. Under the
phase-out provisions, claimants could
receive any remaining entitlement they
have in Tier 4 after June 23, 2012.
Information for Claimants
The duration of benefits payable in
the EUC08 program, and the terms and
conditions under which they are
payable, are governed by Public Laws
110–252, 110–449, 111–5, 111–92, 111–
118, 111–144, 111–157, 111–205, 111–
312, 112–96, and the operating
instructions issued to the states by the
Department. The duration of benefits
payable in the EB program, and the
terms and conditions on which they are
payable, are governed by the FederalState Extended Unemployment
Compensation Act of 1970, as amended,
and the operating instructions issued to
the states by the Department.
In the case of a state concluding an EB
period, the State Workforce Agency will
furnish a written notice of any change
in potential entitlement to each
individual who had established
eligibility for EB (20 CFR 615.13 (c)(4)).
Persons who believe they may be
entitled to benefits under the EB or
EUC08 programs, or who wish to
inquire about their rights under the
program, should contact their State
Workforce Agency.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Office of
Unemployment Insurance,
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Frances
Perkins Bldg. Room S–4524,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone
number (202) 693–3008 (this is not a
toll-free number) or by email:
gibbons.scott@dol.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 31st day of
May, 2012.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training.
[FR Doc. 2012–13836 Filed 6–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request;
Education and Human Resources
Project Monitoring Clearance
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to establish this collection. In
accordance with the requirement of
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing
opportunity for public comment on this
action. After obtaining and considering
public comment, NSF will prepare the
submission requesting Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
clearance of this collection for no longer
than 3 years.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments should be
received by August 6, 2012 to be
assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2012 / Notices
295, Arlington, VA 22030, or by email
to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton at (703) 292–7556 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including federal holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Education and
Human Resources Project Monitoring
Clearance.
OMB Approval Number: 3145–NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not
applicable.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to establish an information
collection.
Abstract: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) requests
establishment of program accountability
data collections that describe and track
the impact of NSF funding that focuses
on the Nation’s science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics (STEM)
education and STEM workforce. NSF
funds grants, contracts, and cooperative
agreements to colleges, universities, and
other eligible institutions, and provides
graduate research fellowships to
individuals in all parts of the United
States and internationally.
The Directorate for Education and
Human Resources (EHR), a unit within
NSF, promotes rigor and vitality within
the Nation’s STEM education enterprise
to further the development of the 21st
century’s STEM workforce and public
scientific literacy. EHR does this
through diverse projects and programs
that support research, extension,
outreach, and hands-on activities that
service STEM learning and research at
all institutional (e.g., pre-school through
postdoctoral) levels in formal and
informal settings; and individuals of all
ages (birth and beyond). EHR also
focuses on broadening participation in
STEM learning and careers among
United States citizens, permanent
residents, and nationals, particularly
those individuals traditionally
underemployed in the STEM research
workforce, including but not limited to
women, persons with disabilities, and
racial and ethnic minorities.
The scope of this information
collection request will primarily cover
descriptive information gathered from
education and training projects that are
funded by NSF. NSF will primarily use
the data from this collection for program
planning, management, and audit
purposes to respond to queries from the
Congress, the public, NSF’s external
merit reviewers who serve as advisors,
including Committees of Visitors
(COVs), the NSF’s Office of the
Inspector General and as a basis for
either internal or third-party evaluations
of individual programs.
The collections will generally include
three categories of descriptive data: (1)
Staff and project participants (data that
are also necessary to determine
individual-level treatment and control
groups for future third-party study or for
internal evaluation); (2) project
implementation characteristics (also
necessary for future use to identify wellmatched comparison groups); and (3)
project outputs (necessary to measure
baseline for pre- and post- NSF-fundinglevel impacts).
Use of the Information: This
information is required for effective
33775
administration, communication,
program and project monitoring and
evaluation, and for measuring
attainment of NSF’s program, project,
and strategic goals, and as identified by
the President’s Accountability in
Government Initiative; GPRA, and the
NSF’s Strategic Plan. The Foundation’s
FY 2011- 2016 Strategic Plan may be
found at: https://www.nsf.gov/news/
strategicplan/
nsfstrategicplan_2011_2016.pdf.
Since the this collection will
primarily be used for accountability and
evaluation purposes, including
responding from queries from COVs and
other scientific experts, a census rather
than sampling design typically is
necessary. At the individual project
level funding can be adjusted based on
individual project’s responses to some
of the surveys. Some data collected
under this collection will serve as
baseline data for separate research and
evaluation studies.
NSF-funded contract or grantee
researchers and internal or external
evaluators in part may identify control,
comparison, or treatment groups for
NSF’s ET portfolio using some of the
descriptive data gathered through this
collection to conduct well-designed,
rigorous research and portfolio
evaluation studies.
Respondents: Individuals or
households, not-for-profit institutions,
business or other for profit, and Federal,
State, local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 9,341.
Burden on the Public: NSF estimates
that a total reporting and recordkeeping
burden of 63,947 hours will result from
activities to monitor EHR STEM
education programs. The calculation is
shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1—ANTICIPATED PROGRAMS THAT WILL COLLECT DATA ON PROJECT PROGRESS AND OUTCOMES ALONG WITH
THE NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS AND BURDEN HOURS PER COLLECTION PER YEAR
No of
respondents
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Collection title
Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology (CREST)
and Historically Black Colleges and Universities Research Infrastructure for Science and Engineering (HBCU–RISE) Monitoring System.
Graduate STEM Fellows in K–12 Education (GK–12) Monitoring System
Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Program
(IGERT) Monitoring System.
Informal Science Education (ISE) Monitoring System ..............................
Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Monitoring
System.
Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation Bridge to the Doctorate
(LSAMP–BD) Monitoring System.
Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program (Noyce) Monitoring System
Research in Disabilities Education (RDE) Monitoring System ..................
Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
Program (S–STEM) Monitoring System.
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion
Program (STEP) Monitoring System.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
No of
responses
Annual hour
burden
37
37 .....................................................
1,374
1,626
4,658
1,626 ................................................
4,658 ................................................
3,941
12,156
157
518
157 ...................................................
518 ...................................................
2,047
17,094
50
50 .....................................................
3,600
294
49
500
294 ...................................................
49 .....................................................
1,000 (500 respondents × 2 responses/yr.)
242 ...................................................
3,822
2,781
6,000
242
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
6,292
33776
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2012 / Notices
TABLE 1—ANTICIPATED PROGRAMS THAT WILL COLLECT DATA ON PROJECT PROGRESS AND OUTCOMES ALONG WITH
THE NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS AND BURDEN HOURS PER COLLECTION PER YEAR—Continued
No of
respondents
Collection title
No of
responses
Annual hour
burden
Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES) Monitoring System.
Additional Collections not Specified ..........................................................
1,210
1,210 ................................................
4,840
900
900 ...................................................
1,200
Total ....................................................................................................
10,241
10,741 ..............................................
65,147
The total estimate for this collection
is 63,947 annual burden hours. The
average annual reporting burden is
between 1.5 and 72 hours per
‘‘respondent,’’ depending on whether a
respondent is a direct participant who is
self-reporting or representing a project
and reporting on behalf of many project
participants.
Dated: June 4, 2012.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2012–13820 Filed 6–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
Proposed Information Collection
Activity: Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
National Transportation Safety
Board (NTSB).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The NTSB is announcing that
it has submitted an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act. This ICR
described completion of a Web-based
form used to collect reports of certain
resolution advisories (RAs), in
accordance with 49 CFR 830.5(a)(10).
This Notice informs the public that it
may submit comments concerning the
NTSB’s proposed collection of
information to the NTSB Desk Officer at
the OMB.
DATES: Submit written comments
regarding this proposed collection of
information by July 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Respondents may submit
written comments on the collection of
information directly to the Desk Officer
for National Transportation Safety
Board, Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, fax 202–395–5806,
or by electronic mail at
oira_docket@omb.eop.gov.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Dunham, NTSB Office of Aviation
Safety, at (202) 314–6387.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, the NTSB previously
published a Notice in the Federal
Register indicating its proposal to
collect the following information: (1)
Confirmation that the incident to be
reported falls under the scope of the
rule; (2) contact information, such as the
submitter’s name, company (if any),
email address, and telephone number;
(3) information about the flight and
aircraft, such as the call sign, type of
aircraft, location and time of the
occurrence, and altitude at which the
aircraft experienced the RA; (4)
information about the air traffic control
(ATC) services being provided to the
aircraft when the RA occurred, such as
the ATC facility name and
communications frequency in use; and
(5) a brief description of the RA type
and circumstances of the incident. 75
FR 15460 (March 29, 2010). Title 49
CFR 830.5(a)(10), which requires reports
of certain RAs, does not require
completion of the Web-based form;
however, the NTSB has created the
Web-based medium in order to provide
respondents with the option of
completing it, in lieu of placing phone
calls or sending other written
communications to the NTSB Office of
Aviation Safety.
The NTSB did not receive any
comments in response to the Notice of
information collection. At this juncture,
in accordance with OMB regulations
that require this additional Notice for
proposed ICRs, the NTSB seeks to notify
the public that it may submit comments
on this proposed ICR to OMB. 5 CFR
1320.10(a). Section 1320.10(a) requires
this ‘‘notice directing requests for
information, including copies of the
proposed collection of information and
supporting documentation, to the
[NTSB].’’ Section 1320.10(a) also
requires the NTSB request that
comments be submitted to OMB,
directed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for NTSB, within 30 days
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
of this notice’s publication. Pursuant to
§ 1320.10(a), the NTSB will provide a
copy of this notice, together with the
date of expected publication, to OMB.
Under § 1320.10(b), within 60 days of
the receipt of the aforementioned
documents, OMB will notify the NTSB
of its decision to approve or disapprove
the collection of information described
herein. Section 1320.10(b) also states
OMB shall provide at least 30 days for
public comment after receipt of the
proposed collection of information
before making its decision.
You are asked to comment on any
aspect of this information collection,
including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the NTSB to
perform its mission; (2) the accuracy of
the estimated burden; (3) ways for the
NTSB to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the collected
information; and (4) ways that the
burden could be minimized without
reducing the quality of the collected
information. The NTSB will summarize
and/or include your comments in the
request for OMB’s clearance of this
information collection.
Respondents’ completion of the
proposed Web-based form is voluntary,
as respondents who seek to report an
incident under 49 CFR 830.5(a)(10) may
do so by telephone or email. The Webbased form will be available on the
NTSB Web site. The form is not
duplicative of other agencies’
collections of information. The NTSB
estimates that respondents will spend
approximately 10 minutes in
completing the form. The NTSB
estimates that approximately 120
respondents per year will complete the
form.
Dated: May 31, 2012.
Deborah A.P. Hersman,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2012–13786 Filed 6–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33774-33776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13820]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request;
Education and Human Resources Project Monitoring Clearance
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to
establish this collection. In accordance with the requirement of
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are
providing opportunity for public comment on this action. After
obtaining and considering public comment, NSF will prepare the
submission requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearance
of this collection for no longer than 3 years.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Written comments should be received by August 6, 2012 to be
assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed information collection request
should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
[[Page 33775]]
295, Arlington, VA 22030, or by email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Plimpton at (703) 292-7556 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is accessible
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (including federal
holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Education and Human Resources Project
Monitoring Clearance.
OMB Approval Number: 3145-NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not applicable.
Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to establish an
information collection.
Abstract: The National Science Foundation (NSF) requests
establishment of program accountability data collections that describe
and track the impact of NSF funding that focuses on the Nation's
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and
STEM workforce. NSF funds grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements
to colleges, universities, and other eligible institutions, and
provides graduate research fellowships to individuals in all parts of
the United States and internationally.
The Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR), a unit
within NSF, promotes rigor and vitality within the Nation's STEM
education enterprise to further the development of the 21st century's
STEM workforce and public scientific literacy. EHR does this through
diverse projects and programs that support research, extension,
outreach, and hands-on activities that service STEM learning and
research at all institutional (e.g., pre-school through postdoctoral)
levels in formal and informal settings; and individuals of all ages
(birth and beyond). EHR also focuses on broadening participation in
STEM learning and careers among United States citizens, permanent
residents, and nationals, particularly those individuals traditionally
underemployed in the STEM research workforce, including but not limited
to women, persons with disabilities, and racial and ethnic minorities.
The scope of this information collection request will primarily
cover descriptive information gathered from education and training
projects that are funded by NSF. NSF will primarily use the data from
this collection for program planning, management, and audit purposes to
respond to queries from the Congress, the public, NSF's external merit
reviewers who serve as advisors, including Committees of Visitors
(COVs), the NSF's Office of the Inspector General and as a basis for
either internal or third-party evaluations of individual programs.
The collections will generally include three categories of
descriptive data: (1) Staff and project participants (data that are
also necessary to determine individual-level treatment and control
groups for future third-party study or for internal evaluation); (2)
project implementation characteristics (also necessary for future use
to identify well-matched comparison groups); and (3) project outputs
(necessary to measure baseline for pre- and post- NSF-funding-level
impacts).
Use of the Information: This information is required for effective
administration, communication, program and project monitoring and
evaluation, and for measuring attainment of NSF's program, project, and
strategic goals, and as identified by the President's Accountability in
Government Initiative; GPRA, and the NSF's Strategic Plan. The
Foundation's FY 2011- 2016 Strategic Plan may be found at: https://www.nsf.gov/news/strategicplan/nsfstrategicplan_2011_2016.pdf.
Since the this collection will primarily be used for accountability
and evaluation purposes, including responding from queries from COVs
and other scientific experts, a census rather than sampling design
typically is necessary. At the individual project level funding can be
adjusted based on individual project's responses to some of the
surveys. Some data collected under this collection will serve as
baseline data for separate research and evaluation studies.
NSF-funded contract or grantee researchers and internal or external
evaluators in part may identify control, comparison, or treatment
groups for NSF's ET portfolio using some of the descriptive data
gathered through this collection to conduct well-designed, rigorous
research and portfolio evaluation studies.
Respondents: Individuals or households, not-for-profit
institutions, business or other for profit, and Federal, State, local
or tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 9,341.
Burden on the Public: NSF estimates that a total reporting and
recordkeeping burden of 63,947 hours will result from activities to
monitor EHR STEM education programs. The calculation is shown in Table
1.
Table 1--Anticipated Programs That Will Collect Data on Project Progress and Outcomes Along With the Number of
Respondents and Burden Hours per Collection per Year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No of Annual hour
Collection title respondents No of responses burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centers of Research Excellence in Science and 37 37.............................. 1,374
Technology (CREST) and Historically Black
Colleges and Universities Research
Infrastructure for Science and Engineering
(HBCU-RISE) Monitoring System.
Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education (GK- 1,626 1,626........................... 3,941
12) Monitoring System.
Integrative Graduate Education and Research 4,658 4,658........................... 12,156
Traineeship Program (IGERT) Monitoring System.
Informal Science Education (ISE) Monitoring 157 157............................. 2,047
System.
Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority 518 518............................. 17,094
Participation (LSAMP) Monitoring System.
Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority 50 50.............................. 3,600
Participation Bridge to the Doctorate (LSAMP-
BD) Monitoring System.
Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 294 294............................. 3,822
(Noyce) Monitoring System.
Research in Disabilities Education (RDE) 49 49.............................. 2,781
Monitoring System.
Scholarships in Science, Technology, 500 1,000 (500 respondents x 2 6,000
Engineering, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM) responses/yr.)
Monitoring System.
Science, Technology, Engineering, and 242 242............................. 6,292
Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP)
Monitoring System.
[[Page 33776]]
Transforming Undergraduate Education in 1,210 1,210........................... 4,840
Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (TUES) Monitoring System.
Additional Collections not Specified.......... 900 900............................. 1,200
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................................... 10,241 10,741.......................... 65,147
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total estimate for this collection is 63,947 annual burden
hours. The average annual reporting burden is between 1.5 and 72 hours
per ``respondent,'' depending on whether a respondent is a direct
participant who is self-reporting or representing a project and
reporting on behalf of many project participants.
Dated: June 4, 2012.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2012-13820 Filed 6-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
