Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals, 33805-33807 [2012-13690]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2012 / Notices
that would be rendered by the proposed
computational methodology.
In summary, the proposed rule
amendments would enable the
Exchange, for margin purposes, to
accommodate the many types of spread
strategies utilized in the industry today
in a fair and efficient manner.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) 20 of the Act and the rules
and regulations under the Act, in
general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5).21 Because this rule filing
proposes a single, universal definition
of a spread and one spread margin
requirement that consists of a universal
margin requirement computation
methodology, it promotes just and
equitable principles of trade and fosters
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities. By adding
clarity and consistency to margin
requirements, it also removes
impediments to and perfects the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
20 15
21 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Jun 06, 2012
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–13763 Filed 6–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2012–043 on the
subject line.
Federal Aviation Administration
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE-2012–043. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2012–043 and should be submitted on
or before June 28, 2012.
22 17
Jkt 226001
33805
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Passenger Facility Charge
(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC
Approvals and Disapprovals. In May
2012, there were three applications
approved. This notice also includes
information on one application,
approved in April 2012, inadvertently
left off the April 2012 notice.
Additionally, four approved
amendments to previously approved
applications are listed.
AGENCY:
The FAA publishes a monthly
notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals
and disapprovals under the provisions
of the Aviation Safety and Capacity
Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 158). This notice is published
pursuant to paragraph d of § 158.29.
SUMMARY:
PFC Applications Approved
PUBLIC AGENCY: Tri State Airport
Authority, Huntington, West Virginia.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12–07–C–
00–HTS.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use
a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $4.50.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED
IN THIS DECISION: $2,369,532.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE
DATE: July 1, 2012.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION
DATE: October 1, 2017.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT
REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC’S: None.
Brief Description of Projects Approved
for Collection and Use
Terminal center—phase I.
PFC application.
Improve airport drainage.
Acquire snow removal equipment.
Install perimeter fencing.
Rehabilitate terminal building.
Rehabilitate taxiway A (west).
Access road repair.
Rehabilitate taxiways g, E, C, F, and
A (ramp edge).
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
33806
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2012 / Notices
Terminal center—phase II.
Environmental assessment—airfield
development.
accounts for less than 1 percent of the
total annual enplanements at Tulsa
International Airport.
Brief Description of Projects Approved
for Collection
Brief Description of Projects Approved
for Collection and Use
Relocate taxiway A (east).
Install airport beacon.
Security enhancements.
Access road and parking lot.
Terminal center—phase III.
Acquire runway protection zone land.
Rehabilitate terminal building—phase
IV.
Reconfigure airside terminal.
Replace airfield generators.
Seal coat runway.
DECISION DATE: April 30, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew DiGiulian, Beckley Airports
Field Office, (304) 252–6217.
PUBLIC AGENCY: Tulsa Airports
Improvement Trust, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12–08–C–
00–TUL.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use
a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $4.50.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED
IN THIS DECISION: $3,430,000.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE
DATE: June 1, 2020.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION
DATE: December 1, 2020.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT
REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC’S: Air
taxi/commercial operators filing FAA
Form 1800–31.
DETERMINATION: Approved. Based
on information contained in the public
agency’s application, the FAA has
determined that the proposed class
Design and enabling projects for
concourse A rehabilitation and
improvement.
Passenger loading bridges.
Security exit lane equipment.
PFC consulting fees.
Brief Description of Disapproved
Project
Electrical generators.
DETERMINATION: Disapproved. This
project did not meet the requirements of
§ 158.15(b).
DECISION DATE: May 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don
Harris, Arkansas/Oklahoma Airports
Development Office, (817) 222–5634.
PUBLIC AGENCY: Port of Port
Angeles, Port Angeles, Washington.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12–08–C–
00–CLM.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use
a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $3.00.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED
IN THIS DECISION: $161,209.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE
DATE: July 1, 2012.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION
DATE: April 1, 2014.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT
REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC’S: None.
Brief Description of Projects Approved
for Collection and Use
Terminal entrance road construction.
Taxilanes construction, phase II.
Terminal apron reconstruction.
Runway 8/26 lighting rehabilitation.
Taxilanes construction, phase III.
PFC administration.
DECISION DATE: May 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trang Tran, Seattle Airports District
Office, (425) 227–1662.
PUBLIC AGENCY: Yuma County
Airport Authority, Yuma, Arizona.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12–04–C–
00–NYL.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use
a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $4.50.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED
IN THIS DECISION: $250,000.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE
DATE: July 1, 2018.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION
DATE: October 1, 2021.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT
REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC’S:
Nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers
filing FAA Form 1800–31.
DETERMINATION: Approved. Based
on information contained in the public
agency’s application, the FAA has
determined that the proposed class
accounts for less than 1 percent of the
total annual enplanements at Yuma
Marine Corps Air Station/Yuma
International Airport.
Brief Description of Project Approved
for Collection and Use
Widen parallel taxiway Z.
DECISION DATE: May 18, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darlene Williams, Los Angeles Airports
District Office, (310) 725–3625.
AMENDMENT TO PFC APPROVALS
Amendment No.
city, state
05–05–C–07–EWR
Newark, NJ ..........................................................................
10–08–C–01–SAV
Savannah, GA ......................................................................
11–17–C–02–BNA
Nashville, TN ........................................................................
08–07–C–01–DTW
Detroit, MI ............................................................................
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Original
approved
net PFC
revenue
Amended
estimated
net PFC
revenue
Original
estimated
charge expiration date
Amended
estimated
charge expiration date
04/06/12
$556,442,435
$566,136,035
07/1/11
09/1/11
05/03/12
4,066,265
6,669,248
04/1/16
12/1/16
05/04/12
2,512,500
2,797,105
03/1/17
06/1/17
05/18/12
257,020,320
227,653,568
08/1/34
02/1/34
Amendment
approved date
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 31,
2012.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger
Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2012–13690 Filed 6–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:08 Jun 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2012 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0045; Notice 1]
Hyundai Motor Company, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Hyundai America Technical
Center, Inc., on behalf of Hyundai Motor
Company (collectively referred to as
‘‘Hyundai’’) 1 has determined that
certain model year 2012 Hyundai
Veracruz multipurpose passenger
vehicles (MPV) manufactured August 9,
2011, through January 8, 2012, that were
equipped with 7J x 18 wheel rims, do
not fully comply with paragraph S4.3.3
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire
Selection and Rims and Motor Home/
Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load
Carrying Capacity Information for Motor
Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536
Kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less.
Hyundai has filed an appropriate report
dated February 9, 2012, pursuant to 49
CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), Hyundai submitted a
petition for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. chapter 301 on the basis that
this noncompliance is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Hyundai’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Vehicles involved: Affected are
approximately 2,764 model year 2012
Hyundai Veracruz vehicles produced
beginning on August 9, 2011, through
January 8, 2012, that were equipped
with 7J x 18 wheel rims at the assembly
plant.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
1 Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc., is a
corporation registered under the laws of the state
of Michigan.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:08 Jun 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore,
these provisions only apply to the
subject 2,764 2 vehicles that Hyundai no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed.
Noncompliance: Hyundai explains
that the noncompliance is that the rim
size information required by paragraph
S4.3.3 of FMVSS No. 110 was omitted
from the certification labels that it
installed on the affected vehicles.
Rule text: Paragraph S4.3.3 of FMVSS
No. 110 requires:
S4.3.3 Additional labeling information
for vehicles other than passenger cars. Each
vehicle shall show the size designation and,
if applicable, the type designation of rims
(not necessarily those on the vehicle)
appropriate for the tire appropriate for use on
that vehicle, including the tire installed as
original equipment on the vehicle by the
vehicle manufacturer, after each GAWR
listed on the certification label required by
§ 567.4 or § 567.5 of this chapter. This
information shall be in the English language,
lettered in block capitals and numerals not
less than 2.4 millimeters high and in the
following format
Truck Example—Suitable Tire-Rim Choice
GVWR: 2,441 kilograms (5381 pounds).
GAWR: Front—1,299 kilograms (2,864
pounds) with P265/70R16 tires, 16 x 8.0
rims at 248 kPa (36 psi) cold single.
GAWR: Rear—1,299 kilograms (2,864
pounds) with P265/70R16 tires, 16 x 8.00
rims, at 248 kPa (36 psi) cold single.
Summary of Hyundai’s Analysis and
Arguments
Hyundai believes that the missing rim
size information on the certification
label is inconsequential as it relates to
motor vehicle safety, because this
information is readily available to the
vehicle owner through other sources
that are required to be furnished with
the vehicle. The rim size is marked on
the rims and is included in the Owner’s
Manual, which is referenced as an
information source by the tire placard
which is positioned adjacent to the
certification label on the ‘‘B’’ pillar.
FMVSS No. 110 paragraph 4.4.2(b) 3
2 Hyundai’s petition, which was filed under 49
CFR part 556, requests an agency decision to
exempt Hyundai as a motor vehicle manufacturer
from the notification and recall responsibilities of
49 CFR part 573 for the 2,764 affected vehicles.
However, a decision on this petition will not relieve
vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions
on the sale, offer for sale, introduction or delivery
for introduction into interstate commerce of the
noncompliant vehicles under their control after
Hyundai notified them that the subject
noncompliance existed.
3 The citation that Hyundai referenced for rim
size designation marking requirements in its
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33807
requires that each rim be marked with
the rim size designation. The affected
vehicles are equipped with rims that are
marked with the rim size and meet the
requirements of FMVSS No. 110
paragraph 4.4.2.
Additionally, the tire placard required
by FMVSS No. 110 paragraph 4.3(d)
requires that the tire size designation be
provided for the tires installed at the
time of the first purchase and FMVSS
No. 110 paragraph S4.3(f) requires that
the placard state ‘‘See Owner’s Manual
for Additional Information’’. The
affected vehicles are equipped with
placards that meet the requirements of
FMVSS No. 110 paragraph 4.3.
Hyundai also stated that they are not
aware of any notices, bulletins, or other
communications that relate directly to
the noncompliance sent to more than
one manufacturer, distributor, dealer, or
purchaser.
Hyundai has additionally informed
NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future
production vehicles will comply with
FMVSS No. 110.
In summation, Hyundai believes that
the described noncompliance of its
vehicles is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition, to
exempt from providing recall
notification of noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
remedying the recall noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be
granted.
Comments: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and be submitted by any of
the following methods:
a. By mail addressed to: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
b. By hand delivery to: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. The Docket Section is open
on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except Federal Holidays.
c. Electronically: By logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
petition, paragraph S4.2.2, is incorrect. The correct
citation is paragraph S4.4.2.
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33805-33807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13690]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and
Disapprovals
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In May 2012,
there were three applications approved. This notice also includes
information on one application, approved in April 2012, inadvertently
left off the April 2012 notice. Additionally, four approved amendments
to previously approved applications are listed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC
approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety
and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). This notice is
published pursuant to paragraph d of Sec. 158.29.
PFC Applications Approved
PUBLIC AGENCY: Tri State Airport Authority, Huntington, West
Virginia.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12-07-C-00-HTS.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $4.50.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED IN THIS DECISION: $2,369,532.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2012.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION DATE: October 1, 2017.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC'S: None.
Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use
Terminal center--phase I.
PFC application.
Improve airport drainage.
Acquire snow removal equipment.
Install perimeter fencing.
Rehabilitate terminal building.
Rehabilitate taxiway A (west).
Access road repair.
Rehabilitate taxiways g, E, C, F, and A (ramp edge).
[[Page 33806]]
Terminal center--phase II.
Environmental assessment--airfield development.
Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection
Relocate taxiway A (east).
Install airport beacon.
Security enhancements.
Access road and parking lot.
Terminal center--phase III.
Acquire runway protection zone land.
Rehabilitate terminal building--phase IV.
Reconfigure airside terminal.
Replace airfield generators.
Seal coat runway.
DECISION DATE: April 30, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew DiGiulian, Beckley Airports
Field Office, (304) 252-6217.
PUBLIC AGENCY: Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12-08-C-00-TUL.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $4.50.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED IN THIS DECISION: $3,430,000.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2020.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION DATE: December 1, 2020.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC'S: Air taxi/
commercial operators filing FAA Form 1800-31.
DETERMINATION: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Tulsa International Airport.
Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use
Design and enabling projects for concourse A rehabilitation and
improvement.
Passenger loading bridges.
Security exit lane equipment.
PFC consulting fees.
Brief Description of Disapproved Project
Electrical generators.
DETERMINATION: Disapproved. This project did not meet the
requirements of Sec. 158.15(b).
DECISION DATE: May 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Harris, Arkansas/Oklahoma Airports
Development Office, (817) 222-5634.
PUBLIC AGENCY: Port of Port Angeles, Port Angeles, Washington.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12-08-C-00-CLM.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $3.00.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED IN THIS DECISION: $161,209.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2012.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION DATE: April 1, 2014.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC'S: None.
Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use
Terminal entrance road construction.
Taxilanes construction, phase II.
Terminal apron reconstruction.
Runway 8/26 lighting rehabilitation.
Taxilanes construction, phase III.
PFC administration.
DECISION DATE: May 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trang Tran, Seattle Airports District
Office, (425) 227-1662.
PUBLIC AGENCY: Yuma County Airport Authority, Yuma, Arizona.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 12-04-C-00-NYL.
APPLICATION TYPE: Impose and use a PFC.
PFC LEVEL: $4.50.
TOTAL PFC REVENUE APPROVED IN THIS DECISION: $250,000.
EARLIEST CHARGE EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2018.
ESTIMATED CHARGE EXPIRATION DATE: October 1, 2021.
CLASS OF AIR CARRIERS NOT REQUIRED TO COLLECT PFC'S: Nonscheduled/
on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800-31.
DETERMINATION: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Yuma Marine Corps Air Station/Yuma International Airport.
Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection and Use
Widen parallel taxiway Z.
DECISION DATE: May 18, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darlene Williams, Los Angeles Airports
District Office, (310) 725-3625.
Amendment to PFC Approvals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Amended
Original Amended estimated estimated
Amendment No. city, state Amendment approved net estimated net charge charge
approved date PFC revenue PFC revenue expiration expiration
date date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05-05-C-07-EWR 04/06/12 $556,442,435 $566,136,035 07/1/11 09/1/11
Newark, NJ......................
10-08-C-01-SAV 05/03/12 4,066,265 6,669,248 04/1/16 12/1/16
Savannah, GA....................
11-17-C-02-BNA 05/04/12 2,512,500 2,797,105 03/1/17 06/1/17
Nashville, TN...................
08-07-C-01-DTW 05/18/12 257,020,320 227,653,568 08/1/34 02/1/34
Detroit, MI.....................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 31, 2012.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2012-13690 Filed 6-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
