Certain CMOS Image Sensors and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337, 33488-33489 [2012-13634]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
33488
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 6, 2012 / Notices
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers,
20 Yeouido-dong, Youngdeungpo-gu,
Seoul 150–721, Republic of Korea;
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan
Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632;
Mitsubishi Electric Corp., Tokyo
Building, 2–7–3, Marunouchi,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100–8310, Japan;
Mitsubishi Electric US Holdings, Inc.,
5665 Plaza Drive, Cypress, CA 90630;
Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics
USA, Inc., 500 Corporate Woods
Parkway, Vernon Hills, IL 60061;
Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions
America, Inc., 9351 Jeronimo Road,
Irvine, CA 92618;
Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America,
Inc., 9351 Jeronimo Road, Irvine, CA
92618;
Netflix Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los
Gatos, CA 95032;
Roku, Inc., 12980 Saratoga Avenue,
Saratoga, CA 95070;
Vizio, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618.
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
(4) The Office of Unfair Imports
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Jun 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
Issued: May 31, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–13632 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–846]
Certain CMOS Image Sensors and
Products Containing Same; Institution
of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
§ 1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
1, 2012, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
§ 1337, on behalf of California Institute
of Technology of Pasadena, California.
Letters supplementing the complaint
were filed on May 21, 2012, and May
22, 2012. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain CMOS image sensors and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 5,841,126 (‘‘the ‘126 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 5,990,506 (‘‘the ‘506
patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 6,606,122
(‘‘the ‘122 patent’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
SUMMARY:
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR § 210.10
(2012).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
May 25, 2012, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain CMOS image
sensors and products containing same
that infringe one or more of claims 1
and 2 of the ‘126 patent; claims 15 and
16 of the ‘506 patent; and claim 6 of the
‘122 patent, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors, 19
U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
California Institute of Technology,
1200 East California Boulevard,
Pasadena, CA 91125;
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
STMicroelectronics NV, 39 Chemin du
Champ des Filles, C. P. 21, CH 1228
Plan-Les-Ouates, Geneva,
Switzerland;
STMicroelectronics Inc., 750 Canyon
Drive, Coppell, TX 75019;
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 6, 2012 / Notices
Nokia Corp., Keilalahdentie 2–4, FI–
02150 Espoo, Finland;
Nokia, Inc., 102 Corporate Park Drive,
White Plains, NY 10604;
Research In Motion Ltd., 295 Phillip
Street, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L
3W8;
Research In Motion Corp., 122 W. John
Carpenter Parkway, Suite 430, Irving,
TX 75038;
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 31, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–13634 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Jun 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
Consent Decree Library at the address
given above.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2012, a proposed Consent Decree (the
Consent Decree) in United States of
America v. Minnie Moore Resources,
Inc. et al, Civil Action No. 2:11–cv–
00127–BLW, was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
District of Idaho.
In this action the United States sought
reimbursement under Section 107 of
CERCLA for past costs incurred at the
Minnie Moore Mine Superfund Site (the
Site), located in Blaine County, Idaho.
The United States also sought a
declaratory judgment under Section 113
of CERCLA for future costs to be
incurred at the Site. Under the proposed
Consent Decree, which is based on
ability to pay, Minnie Moore Resources,
Inc. has agreed to secure an
environmental covenant to protect the
remediation of the Site. The Consent
Decree includes a covenant not to sue
Minnie Moore Resources, Inc. pursuant
to Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. 9606 & 9607.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either emailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States of America v. Minnie Moore
Resources, Inc., DJ. Ref. 90–11–3–09515.
During the comment period, the
Consent Decree may be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web
site: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or
by faxing or emailing a request to
‘‘Consent Decree Copy’’
(EESCDCopy.ENRD@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–5271. If requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$8.75 (25 cents per page reproduction
cost) payable to the United States
Treasury or, if by email or fax, please
forward a check in that amount to the
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
33489
Maureen Katz,
Deputy Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–13633 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1590]
Draft Offender Tracking System
Standard
AGENCY:
National Institute of Justice.
Notice of Draft Offender
Tracking System Standard, Selection
and Application Guide, and
Certification Program Requirements.
ACTION:
In an effort to obtain
comments from interested parties, the
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of
Justice Programs, National Institute of
Justice will make available to the
general public three draft documents:
(1) A draft standard entitled, ‘‘Offender
Tracking System Standard’’ (2) a draft
companion document entitled,
‘‘Offender Tracking System Certification
Program Requirements’’ and (3) a
Selection and Application Guide.
The opportunity to provide comments
on these three documents is open to
industry technical representatives,
criminal justice agencies and
organizations, research, development
and scientific communities, and all
other stakeholders and interested
parties. Those individuals wishing to
obtain and provide comments on the
draft documents under consideration
are directed to the following Web site:
https://www.justnet.org.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before July 23, 2012.
DATES:
Jack
Harne, by telephone at 202–616–2911 or
Lisa Bache by telephone at 202–514–
9337 [Note: these are not toll-free
telephone numbers], or by email at
jack.harne@usdoj.gov or by email at
lisa.bache@usdoj.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John H. Laub,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012–13681 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33488-33489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13634]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-846]
Certain CMOS Image Sensors and Products Containing Same;
Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 1, 2012, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337, on behalf
of California Institute of Technology of Pasadena, California. Letters
supplementing the complaint were filed on May 21, 2012, and May 22,
2012. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337
based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain CMOS image sensors and products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,841,126 (``the `126
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 5,990,506 (``the `506 patent''); and U.S.
Patent No. 6,606,122 (``the `122 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR Sec. 210.10 (2012).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on May 25, 2012, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain CMOS image
sensors and products containing same that infringe one or more of
claims 1 and 2 of the `126 patent; claims 15 and 16 of the `506 patent;
and claim 6 of the `122 patent, and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors, 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1),
(g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard,
Pasadena, CA 91125;
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
STMicroelectronics NV, 39 Chemin du Champ des Filles, C. P. 21, CH 1228
Plan-Les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland;
STMicroelectronics Inc., 750 Canyon Drive, Coppell, TX 75019;
[[Page 33489]]
Nokia Corp., Keilalahdentie 2-4, FI-02150 Espoo, Finland;
Nokia, Inc., 102 Corporate Park Drive, White Plains, NY 10604;
Research In Motion Ltd., 295 Phillip Street, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
N2L 3W8;
Research In Motion Corp., 122 W. John Carpenter Parkway, Suite 430,
Irving, TX 75038;
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 31, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-13634 Filed 6-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P