Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Izod Women's Wholesale Division, New York, NY; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 33491 [2012-13592]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 6, 2012 / Notices
production of elevator components and
to the supply of elevator repair services
(all related to the modernization and
repair of elevator).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that there was no shift in
production of elevator components (or a
like or directly competitive article), that
neither the subject firm nor its declining
customer increased imports, and that
the subject firm was neither a supplier
nor downstream producer to a TAAcertified firm.
The request for reconsideration stated
that the subject firm made not only
elevator component parts and repaired
elevators but also made complete
elevators, and that the workers who
produced the elevators are separately
identifiable from the workers who
supplied elevator repair services.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
May, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–13590 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Department’s Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
on April 19, 2012 (77 FR 23511).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that with respect to Section
222(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act, imports of
services like or directly competitive
with the design, sourcing, and sales
services supplied by the subject firm has
not increased.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of
the Act, the investigation revealed that
the subject firm did not shift the supply
of design, sourcing, and sales services to
a foreign country (or like or directly
competitive services) or acquire the
supply of design, sourcing, and sales
services (or like or directly competitive
services) from a foreign country.
With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of
the Act, the investigation revealed that
Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation is not
a Supplier or Downstream Producer to
a firm that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(a).
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner supplied new information
regarding the worker group as well as a
possible shift in services to a foreign
country.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–81,264]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Izod
Women’s Wholesale Division, New
York, NY; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
May, 2012
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
By application dated May 14, 2012, a
worker requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of Phillips-Van
Heusen Corporation, Izod Women’s
Wholesale Division, New York, New
York (subject firm). The determination
was issued on April 6, 2012. The
[FR Doc. 2012–13592 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Jun 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
PO 00000
33491
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–81,287]
American Woodmark Corporation,
Moorefield, WV; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated March 26, 2012,
a representative of the United
Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners
of America, Local Union 2101,
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance applicable to workers of the
subject firm. The determination was
issued on March 9, 2012 and the
Department’s Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
on March 26, 2012 (77 FR 17528). The
workers produce kitchen and bathroom
cabinetry components.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that there was no shift in the
production of articles like or directly
competitive with the kitchen and
bathroom cabinetry components
produced by the subject firm nor were
there increased subject firm or customer
imports of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by the
subject firm.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
May, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–13589 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 33491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13592]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-81,264]
Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Izod Women's Wholesale Division,
New York, NY; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated May 14, 2012, a worker requested
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former workers of Phillips-Van Heusen
Corporation, Izod Women's Wholesale Division, New York, New York
(subject firm). The determination was issued on April 6, 2012. The
Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal
Register on April 19, 2012 (77 FR 23511).
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that with respect to Section 222(a)(2)(A)(ii) of
the Act, imports of services like or directly competitive with the
design, sourcing, and sales services supplied by the subject firm has
not increased.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that the subject firm did not shift the supply of design,
sourcing, and sales services to a foreign country (or like or directly
competitive services) or acquire the supply of design, sourcing, and
sales services (or like or directly competitive services) from a
foreign country.
With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation is not a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a).
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner supplied new
information regarding the worker group as well as a possible shift in
services to a foreign country.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and will conduct further
investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility
requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of May, 2012
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-13592 Filed 6-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P