Eligible Obligations, Charitable Contributions, Nonmember Deposits, Fixed Assets, Investments, Fidelity Bonds, Incidental Powers, Member Business Loans, and Regulatory Flexibility Program, 31981-31993 [2012-13212]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/News_&_
Events/Email_Subscription/. Options
range from recalls, export information,
regulations, directives, and notices.
Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password-protect their
accounts.
Done at Washington, DC, May 25, 2012.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–13283 Filed 5–29–12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 701, 703, 713, 721, 723,
and 742
RIN 3133–AD98
Eligible Obligations, Charitable
Contributions, Nonmember Deposits,
Fixed Assets, Investments, Fidelity
Bonds, Incidental Powers, Member
Business Loans, and Regulatory
Flexibility Program
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule and interim final rule
with comment period.
AGENCY:
NCUA is removing certain
regulations and eliminating the
Regulatory Flexibility Program
(RegFlex) to provide regulatory relief to
federal credit unions. NCUA is also
removing or amending related rules to
ease compliance burden while retaining
certain safety and soundness standards.
Those rules pertain to eligible
obligations, charitable contributions,
nonmember deposits, fixed assets,
investments, incidental powers, and
member business loans. In addition,
NCUA is issuing an interim final rule
with a request for comment to amend a
provision in the fidelity bond rule to
remove references to RegFlex.
DATES: Effective dates: The final rule, as
well as the interim final rule pertaining
to the revisions in the fidelity bond rule,
§ 713.6, will go into effect on July 2,
2012.
Comment date: We will consider
comments on the interim final rule
portion (the fidelity bond rule, § 713.6),
as discussed in section IV of the
preamble of this rulemaking. Send your
comments to reach us on or before July
30, 2012. We may not consider
comments received after the above date
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
in making any decision whether to
amend the interim final rule.
ADDRESSES: In commenting on the
interim final rule, you may submit
comments by any of the following
methods (Please send comments by one
method only):
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• NCUA Web Site: https://www.ncua.
gov/Legal/Regs/Pages/PropRegs.aspx.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Interim Final Rule,
Section 713.6, Fidelity Bond’’ in the
email subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for email.
• Mail: Address to Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
Public Inspection: You can view all
public comments on NCUA’s Web site
at https://www.ncua.gov/Legal/Regs/
Pages/PropRegs.aspx as submitted,
except for those we cannot post for
technical reasons. NCUA will not edit or
remove any identifying or contact
information from the public comments
submitted. You may inspect paper
copies of comments in NCUA’s law
library at 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314, by appointment
weekdays between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. To
make an appointment, call (703) 518–
6546 or send an email to
OGCMail@ncua.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chrisanthy Loizos, Staff Attorney, Office
of General Counsel, at the above address
or telephone (703) 518–6540, or
Matthew J. Biliouris, Director of
Supervision, or J. Owen Cole, Director,
Division of Capital Markets, Office of
Examination and Insurance, at the above
address or telephone (703) 518–6360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of Comments on December 2011
Proposed Rule
III. Final Rule
IV. Interim Final Rule and Request for
Comment
V. Rule Summary Table
VI. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background
a. Why is NCUA adopting this rule?
On July 11, 2011, President Obama
issued Executive Order 13579, ordering
independent agencies, including NCUA,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31981
to consider whether they can modify,
streamline, expand, or repeal existing
rules to make their programs more
effective and less burdensome.
Consistent with the spirit of the
Executive Order and as part of NCUA’s
Regulatory Modernization Initiative, the
NCUA Board (Board) is adopting this
rule to streamline its regulatory program
by eliminating RegFlex. The final rule
relieves regulatory burden on federal
credit unions (FCUs) because they will
no longer need to engage in any process
for a RegFlex designation. In addition,
the final rule provides regulatory relief
to FCUs that are currently not RegFlex
eligible because it extends to them most
of the flexibilities previously available
only to RegFlex FCUs.
The Board issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in
December 2011. 76 FR 81421 (Dec. 28,
2011). The comment period on the
proposed rule ended on February 27,
2012. NCUA received seventeen
comment letters on the NPRM: Four
from FCUs, three from trade
associations (1 representing banks, 2
representing credit unions), nine from
state credit union leagues, and one from
a law firm. The majority of the
commenters supported the rulemaking
generally. Four commenters did not
support the rule as proposed, and the
remaining commenters offered
comments on particular provisions but
did not take a position on the initiative
as a whole. For the reasons discussed
below, the Board is adopting the
amendments almost exactly as
proposed. As such, the Board does not
restate the legal analysis it presented in
the NPRM’s preamble and incorporates
it by reference here in this rulemaking.
Id.
b. What was RegFlex?
The Board established RegFlex in
2002. 66 FR 58656 (Nov. 23, 2001).
RegFlex relieved FCUs from certain
regulatory restrictions and granted them
additional powers if they demonstrated
sustained superior performance as
measured by CAMEL rating and net
worth classification. An FCU could
qualify for RegFlex treatment
automatically or by application to the
appropriate regional director.
Specifically, an FCU automatically
qualified for a RegFlex designation
when it received a composite CAMEL
rating of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ for two consecutive
examination cycles and maintained a
net worth classification of ‘‘well
capitalized’’ under part 702 of NCUA’s
rules for the last six quarters. An FCU
subject to a risk-based net worth
(RBNW) requirement under part 702
could also qualify for RegFlex treatment
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
31982
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
if it remained ‘‘well capitalized’’ for the
last six quarters after applying the
applicable RBNW requirement. FCUs
that did not automatically qualify for a
RegFlex designation could seek one
with the appropriate regional director.
The rule gave RegFlex FCUs relief
from restrictions in the following six
areas or ‘‘flexibilities’’: (1) Charitable
contributions; (2) nonmember deposits;
(3) fixed assets; (4) zero-coupon
investments; (5) borrowing repurchase
transactions; and (6) commercial
mortgage related securities (CMRS). It
provided an additional flexibility by
specifically authorizing the purchase of
obligations from federally insured credit
unions beyond those an FCU may
purchase under the NCUA’s eligible
obligations rule, § 701.23. RegFlex FCUs
were also permitted a higher maximum
allowable deductible for fidelity bond
coverage under § 713.6.
c. What changes did NCUA propose?
The Board proposed to eliminate
RegFlex and the charitable contributions
rule, and amend the rules that apply to
eligible obligations, nonmember
deposits, fixed assets, and investments,
so that all FCUs could engage in
activities previously permitted only for
RegFlex FCUs, subject to some
conditions. 76 FR 81421 (Dec. 28, 2011).
The NPRM removed the charitable
contributions rule in its entirety and
placed the remaining six flexibilities of
the RegFlex rule into the subjectspecific rules that apply to all FCUs. It
adjusted the nonmember deposits rule
to allow some FCUs to accept more
nonmember deposits. The proposed rule
extended to six years the amount of time
in which all FCUs must occupy
unimproved property under NCUA’s
fixed assets rule. The proposed
amendments to the investment rule
permitted extended maturities for zerocoupon investments and borrowing
repurchase transactions, as well as the
purchase of CMRS under similar
conditions allowed for RegFlex FCUs.
The NPRM moved the provisions to buy
nonmember and other obligations from
the RegFlex rule into the eligible
obligations rule, § 701.23. Lastly, the
proposal made a nonsubstantive change
to the member business loan rule that
cross-references RegFlex.
While providing additional regulatory
flexibility, the NPRM made a few
modifications to authorities and did not
extend the full scope of every RegFlex
authority to all FCUs. The Board
proposed to remove the automatic
exemption from the nonmember
deposits limit that had been granted to
RegFlex FCUs. In so doing, the Board
noted that the change would not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
negatively impact those FCUs based on
the volume of nonmember deposits held
by them.
With regard to the investment rule
amendments, the NPRM created a ‘‘well
capitalized standard’’ based on the
automatic designation criteria used in
RegFlex. An FCU meets the well
capitalized standard if it has received a
composite CAMEL rating of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’
for two consecutive full examinations
and (1) has maintained a ‘‘well
capitalized’’ net worth classification for
the immediately preceding six quarters,
or (2) has remained ‘‘well capitalized’’
for the immediately preceding six
quarters after applying the applicable
RBNW requirement.
The proposed rule provided that well
capitalized FCUs could purchase zerocoupon investments with a maximum
maturity of no more than 30 years,
while FCUs not meeting the standard
would continue to be subject to a
maturity cap of 10 years unless they
received approval from their regional
director. The NPRM permitted FCUs not
meeting the well capitalized standard to
enter into borrowing repurchase
transactions in which the security
purchased with the proceeds from the
borrowing agreement matured no more
than 30 days after the maturity of the
borrowing, unless they received
additional approval from their regional
director. Consistent with the RegFlex
program, the NPRM did not impose the
30-day mismatch restriction on FCUs
meeting the well capitalized standard.
The proposal limited the amount of
securities that any FCU, whether well
capitalized or not, could purchase with
mismatched maturities to 100% of the
FCU’s net worth. It also permitted FCUs
not meeting the well capitalized
standard to purchase private label
CMRS subject to an aggregate limit of
25% of net worth, unless their regional
director granted authority to purchase
securities in an amount up to 50% of
net worth, which is the cap for FCUs
meeting the well capitalized standard.
II. Summary of Comments on December
2011 Proposed Rule
A majority of commenters supported
the Board’s efforts to extend regulatory
flexibility to FCUs. Other commenters
felt the proposal did not provide enough
relief and failed to extend similar relief
to federally insured, state-chartered
credit unions. One credit union trade
association stated that the proposal
removed clear eligibility standards for
FCUs to obtain expanded authorities. It
opposed the elimination of an appeals
process to NCUA’s Supervisory Review
Committee, similar to the one through
which RegFlex FCUs could appeal
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RegFlex designation revocations, if an
FCU were not permitted to engage in the
full range of flexibilities. The bank trade
association stated that, although it
supports efforts to reduce regulatory
burdens, NCUA should not extend such
regulatory relief to FCUs that are
undercapitalized or represent
supervisory concerns. Another
commenter found that the RegFlex
program under part 742 sufficiently
accomplished its goals in its current
form. The Board has carefully reviewed
and analyzed the comment letters and
describes specific comments on the
NPRM below.
a. Charitable Contributions
In the NPRM, the Board proposed to
eliminate the entire charitable
contributions rule, § 701.25. Section
701.25 restricts an FCU’s ability to make
donations. It only allows an FCU to
make charitable contributions or
donations to nonprofit organizations
located or conducting activities in a
community in which the FCU has a
place of business, or to organizations
that are tax exempt under § 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code and that
operate primarily to promote and
develop credit unions. It further
requires an FCU’s board of directors to
approve charitable contributions based
on a determination that the
contributions are in the FCU’s best
interests and are reasonable given the
FCU’s size and financial condition.
Under the rule, directors may establish
a budget for charitable donations and
authorize FCU officials to select
recipients and disburse funds. The
RegFlex rule, § 742.4(a)(1), exempted
RegFlex FCUs from the entire charitable
contributions rule. By removing
§ 701.25, the Board is now allowing any
FCU to make donations without the
prior approval of its board of directors
and without regulatory restrictions as to
recipients.
In the NPRM, the Board noted that,
even in the absence of a charitable
contributions rule, an FCU’s authority to
make donations is authorized by
incidental powers given in the Federal
Credit Union Act (Act), 12 U.S.C.
1757(17). As such, contributions must
be necessary or requisite to enable the
FCU to effectively carry on its business.
See 12 CFR 721.2. Furthermore, FCU
directors have a fiduciary duty to direct
management to operate within sound
business practices and the best interests
of the membership under § 701.4. In
addition, article XVI, section 4 of the
FCU Bylaws prohibits FCU directors,
committee members, officers, agents,
and employees from conflicts of interest
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
that could arise in the context of making
charitable donations.
Two credit union trade associations,
four leagues, and three credit unions
supported the elimination of the
charitable contributions rule. Three of
these commenters maintained that the
limitations on an FCU’s incidental
powers, the board’s fiduciary duties,
and the FCU Bylaws already set the
appropriate standards for charitable
contributions. One commenter stated
that the change would eliminate a
bureaucratic hurdle and enable FCUs to
further their mission of helping people
of modest means. The bank trade
association stated that the charitable
contributions rule protects the interests
of members and avoids conflicts of
interest and, therefore, requested that
NCUA retain it. The Board believes the
Act, FCU bylaws, part 721, and § 701.4
provide sufficient constraints on an
FCU’s ability to make charitable
contributions. Accordingly, the final
rule removes § 701.25 as proposed.
One credit union commenter
expressed concern that FCUs would
need to seek approval to make
donations because NCUA did not
propose to amend § 721.3 to expressly
identify charitable contributions as a
preapproved incidental power. Since
1979, NCUA has recognized that FCUs
may make charitable contributions
under the provision in the Act that
authorizes an FCU ‘‘to exercise such
incidental powers as shall be necessary
or requisite to enable it to carry on
effectively the business for which it is
incorporated.’’ 44 FR 56691 (Oct. 2,
1979); 64 FR 19441 (Apr. 21, 1999); 12
U.S.C. 1757(17). The Board appreciates
the suggestion to clarify an FCU’s
authority to make charitable
contributions and donations in the
incidental powers rule. The final rule
amends § 721.3 accordingly by adding a
new paragraph, derived from NCUA
legal opinions, identifying this
authority.
b. Nonmember Deposits
The Act permits an FCU to receive
shares from nonmember public units,
political subdivisions, and credit
unions, subject to the limits in the
nonmember deposits rule, § 701.32. 12
U.S.C. 1757(6); 12 CFR 701.32. Under
paragraph (b) of § 701.32, the maximum
amount of all public unit and
nonmember shares that an FCU may
hold cannot exceed the greater of 20%
of the FCU’s total shares or $1.5 million.
Under paragraph (c) of § 701.32,
nonmember share deposits that an FCU
has accepted to meet a matching
requirement for a Community
Development Revolving Loan Fund loan
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
count against the nonmember deposit
limit once the FCU has repaid the loan.
An FCU may request an exemption from
its regional director to exceed the limit.
If the regional director denies the
request for an exemption, the FCU may
appeal the decision to the Board. The
RegFlex rule exempted RegFlex FCUs
from both paragraphs (b) and (c) of
§ 701.32, so RegFlex FCUs have not
been subject to the limit on the amount
of public unit and nonmember shares.
The NPRM raised the dollar threshold
on the nonmember deposit limit in
§ 701.32(b) to $3 million. The Board
acknowledged that, by eliminating
RegFlex, RegFlex FCUs would lose their
blanket exemption from the nonmember
deposit cap. Based on the amount of
nonmember deposits held by RegFlex
FCUs, however, the Board stated that
the proposal provided all of the
necessary flexibility and regulatory
relief to all FCUs without adversely
affecting any of the RegFlex FCUs that
have accepted nonmember deposits in
excess of the cap.
Both credit union trade associations
and two leagues objected to the
elimination of the RegFlex blanket
exemption from the nonmember deposit
rule’s cap because all FCUs would now
need a waiver to exceed the cap. One
commenter stated that most FCUs find
the waiver process, in general, to be
unduly burdensome, time consuming,
and, on occasion, arbitrary. One
commenter characterized the removal of
the exemption as an unfair and
inflexible approach, and another stated
that the change does not represent an
easing of regulatory compliance burden.
Three of these commenters generally
supported raising the dollar threshold,
but one of the trade associations stated
it was unclear why NCUA chose the
new level to be $3 million. The league
commenters agreed with the $3 million
threshold, suggested a higher threshold,
or advocated preservation of the
exemption for RegFlex institutions. One
commenter suggested that NCUA
eliminate the cap or, at a minimum,
increase it to $5 million.
Two league commenters and one
credit union supported the change to
the nonmember deposit dollar
threshold. One commenter stated that,
although the rule would eliminate the
current exemption, the proposal
provided the appropriate amount of
flexibility and regulatory relief to FCUs
without adversely impacting RegFlex
FCUs. Another commenter noted that
smaller asset-sized FCUs can enjoy the
opportunity to acquire an increased
volume of nonmember deposits.
The bank trade association supported
the proposed rule’s requirement that all
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31983
FCUs be subject to nonmember share
limits. It objected, however, to the
proposed increase of the dollar
threshold from $1.5 million to $3
million, citing asset liability
management and liquidity concerns that
could be created for some small FCUs
with such an increase. The commenter
stated that small FCUs may not have the
necessary plans, practices, and
experience to manage such an inflow of
deposits. It, therefore, recommended the
rule require small FCUs taking
advantage of the higher threshold of $3
million to adopt policies managing the
risk associated with nonmember
deposits. The commenter further stated
that because NCUA’s Prompt Corrective
Action rule, § 702.202, specifies that the
prohibition on accepting nonmember
deposits is a discretionary supervisory
action for NCUA, undercapitalized
credit unions should be prohibited from
accepting or rolling over nonmember
deposits.
As the Board stated in the NPRM,
nonmember shares are characteristically
more volatile than core member shares.
This additional volatility can pose asset
liability management concerns and
liquidity concerns. The Board
determined it was appropriate to raise
the dollar threshold to $3 million
because the agency’s data reveals that
only four RegFlex FCUs currently
exceed the limitation in § 701.32(b) of
the greater of 20% of total shares or $1.5
million in nonmember deposits, and
each of those FCUs holds less than $3
million. To raise the maximum dollar
threshold to $5 million would create a
wider gap for FCUs with lower total
shares from the percentage of 20% of
total shares threshold without any need
for such an increase. For instance, an
FCU with $7.5 million in total shares
has been subject to the $1.5 million and
20% percent caps of § 701.32. Under
this final rule, however, the FCU will be
permitted to accept up to $3 million in
nonmember deposits, representing 40%
of total shares. To permit this FCU to
accept up to $5 million in shares would
permit the FCU to accept nonmember
deposits amounting to two-thirds or
over 66% of its total shares. As such, the
final rule maintains the proposed
adjustment to the dollar threshold in
paragraph (b)(1) because it maintains
the regulatory relief that RegFlex FCUs
have enjoyed. Furthermore, the
adjustment extends relief to FCUs,
particularly those FCUs that have lower
amounts of total shares, and remains
attentive to safety and soundness
considerations. The Board also finds it
unnecessary to include a blanket
prohibition for undercapitalized FCUs
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
31984
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
to accept nonmember deposits in
§ 701.32 as suggested by one
commenter. The Prompt Corrective
Action rule, § 702.202(b)(6), offers
NCUA the appropriate flexibility in
determining whether limiting or
prohibiting an undercapitalized FCU
from accepting nonmember deposits is
the appropriate supervisory action
under particular facts.
c. Fixed Assets
The Act authorizes an FCU to
purchase, hold, and dispose of property
necessary or incidental to its operations.
12 U.S.C. 1757(4). Generally, the fixed
assets rule provides limits on fixed asset
investments, establishes occupancy and
other requirements for acquired and
abandoned premises, and prohibits
certain transactions. 12 CFR 701.36.
‘‘Fixed assets’’ is defined in § 701.36(e)
and includes premises. ‘‘Premises’’
means any office, branch office,
suboffice, service center, parking lot,
facility, or real estate where a credit
union transacts or will transact
business.
When an FCU acquires premises for
future expansion and does not fully
occupy the space within one year, the
rule requires the FCU’s board of
directors to have a resolution in place
by the end of that year with plans for
full occupation. 12 CFR 701.36(b)(1).
Additionally, the FCU must partially
occupy the premises within three years,
unless the FCU obtains a waiver within
30 months of acquiring the premises. 12
CFR 701.36(b)(1)–(2). RegFlex FCUs
have enjoyed more flexibility by having
authority to take up to six years to
partially occupy unimproved land they
acquired for future expansion. 12 CFR
701.36(d), 742.4(a)(3). In the NPRM, the
Board proposed to amend the fixed
assets rule to extend the three-year time
period to six years for any FCU that
acquires unimproved land.
One credit union trade association,
five leagues, and two credit unions
supported the proposed extension of
time from three years to six years. One
league noted that, while most FCUs will
probably not use the expanded time
frame, the flexibility will assist them in
implementing building plans efficiently.
Another league stated that the change
provides relief to FCUs that acquired
land during better economic times or
rates. It noted that, under the proposed
extension, FCUs will not be forced to
choose between seeking a waiver or
selling land because they could not
meet the three-year timeline.
As noted in the NPRM’s preamble and
discussed in previous rulemakings, the
Board recognizes that many real estate
transactions are complex and time
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
consuming, and they involve a full array
of issues that an FCU must address
before it is ready to occupy the
premises. This is especially true in the
unimproved land context with its
construction-related issues. The final
rule adopts the change to the fixed
assets rule as proposed by permitting
any FCU a longer time (up to six years,
rather than only three years) to partially
occupy the premises if it initially
acquired the property as unimproved
land.
d. Investment Authorities
Some of the commenters provided
general comments applicable to most or
all facets of the NPRM’s proposed
changes to the investment rule. One
credit union generally supported the
ability of all FCUs to invest in zerocoupon investments and CMRS, as well
as to engage in borrowing repurchase
transactions. Two leagues stated that,
while their members were generally
supportive of giving FCUs expanded
investment authorities, these relatively
sophisticated financial instruments
require a baseline of expertise. The
commenters stated that the rule should
include requirements for staff to have
demonstrated expertise to handle these
transactions. One league argued that the
proposal’s well capitalized standard
merely eliminates the RegFlex
designation while preserving the same
restrictions on eligibility. As such, the
commenter urged NCUA to consider
whether the current restrictions on some
types of investments should be removed
for more FCUs to allow flexibility in
diversifying investments and to reduce
reliance on the ‘‘currently limited’’
investments allowed under NCUA’s
rules. The Board maintains the
standards and conditions for the various
investment authorities set forth the
proposed rule as discussed in the
responses to specific comments below.
1. Zero-coupon Investments
Under § 703.16(b), an FCU may not
purchase a zero-coupon investment
with a maturity date that is more than
10 years from the related settlement
date. RegFlex FCUs have been exempt
from the maximum maturity length of
10 years in the investment rule. 12 CFR
742.4(a)(4). To balance the risk
management concerns inherent in zerocoupon investments with the flexibility
previously granted to RegFlex FCUs, the
Board proposed to establish the
maximum maturity date of zero-coupon
investments to 30 years for any FCU that
meets the NPRM’s well capitalized
standard. The Board proposed to
grandfather zero-coupon investments
purchased in accordance with
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 742.4(a)(4) before the effective date of
the final rule, so FCUs that purchased
zero-coupon investments with
maturities greater than 10 years under
RegFlex authority would not be required
to divest those investments. The
proposed rule also provided that an
FCU not meeting the well capitalized
standard may only purchase a zerocoupon investment with a maturity date
that is no more than 10 years from the
related settlement date, unless it
received approval from its regional
director to purchase such an investment
with a greater maturity.
Three commenters objected to the
proposed rule change for zero-coupon
investments. One credit union trade
association encouraged NCUA to
eliminate the 10-year maturity limit for
zero-coupon investments. One credit
union stated the current rule is
sufficient. Both of these commenters
stated that this issue is more
appropriately addressed within an
FCU’s investment policy. One league
stated that it is more appropriate to
adopt a rule specific to interest rate risk
rather than remove the current
flexibility afforded to certain RegFlex
FCUs.
Two leagues supported the proposed
changes regarding zero-coupon
investments. One commenter stated that
it is reasonable to require an FCU that
does not meet the well capitalized
standard to obtain approval from its
regional director to purchase a zerocoupon investment with a maturity
greater than ten years. The commenter
also supported the creation of a
maximum maturity date of 30 years for
well capitalized FCUs. Another
commenter suggested that the proposal
include greater flexibility by permitting
well capitalized FCUs to pursue a
waiver from the 30-year maturity limit,
as other FCUs would have the option to
seek waivers from their 10-year maturity
cap.
As the Board noted in the NPRM’s
preamble, the percentage loss on zerocoupon investments increases
dramatically with maturity. These losses
could make FCUs reluctant to sell zerocoupon investments and recognize
losses during periods of liquidity stress.
Therefore, consistent with safety and
soundness principles, the Board does
not believe it is appropriate to allow
FCUs to purchase or hold zero-coupon
investments with maturity dates that
exceed 30 years. Accordingly, the Board
adopts the final rule as proposed.
2. Borrowing Repurchase Transactions
A borrowing repurchase transaction is
a transaction in which an FCU agrees to
sell a security to a counterparty and to
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
repurchase the same or an identical
security from that counterparty at a
specified future date and at a specified
price. 12 CFR 703.2. Subject to
additional restrictions, an FCU may
enter into a borrowing repurchase
transaction as long as any investments
the FCU purchases with borrowed funds
mature no later than the maturity of the
borrowing repurchase transaction. 12
CFR 703.13(d).
While the investment rule prohibits
an FCU from purchasing a security with
the proceeds from a borrowing
repurchase agreement if the purchased
security matures after the maturity of
the borrowing repurchase agreement,
NCUA adopted a limited exemption for
RegFlex FCUs from the maturity
restriction. 12 CFR 703.13(d)(3); 68 FR
32958, 32959 (June 3, 2003). A RegFlex
FCU has been permitted to purchase
securities with maturities exceeding the
maturity of the borrowing repurchase
transaction, commonly referred to as
having mismatched maturities, provided
the amount of any such purchased
securities does not exceed the FCU’s net
worth. 12 CFR 742.4(a)(5).
In the NPRM, the Board proposed to
continue this flexibility of mismatched
maturities for borrowing repurchase
transactions for FCUs meeting the well
capitalized standard. It also proposed to
grandfather borrowing repurchase
transactions into which an FCU entered
pursuant to its RegFlex authority before
the effective date of the final rule. The
Board also sought to extend relief from
the maturity requirement to FCUs not
meeting the well capitalized standard.
Under the proposed rule, these FCUs
could enter into borrowing repurchase
transactions and use the proceeds to
purchase investments with maturities
no more than 30 days later than the
transaction’s term, so long as the value
of the purchased investments would not
exceed the related FCU’s net worth. In
addition, under the NPRM, FCUs not
meeting the well capitalized standard
would be allowed to request additional
authority from their regional directors to
enter transactions whereby the maturity
mismatch would be greater than 30
days. Lastly, the Board sought comment
on whether the final rule should specify
minimum experience requirements for
staff involved in the analysis and
ongoing risk management of a
repurchase agreement book, especially
in cases where maturities of sources and
uses are mismatched.
Two leagues and one credit union
supported the revised standards on
maturity matching for borrowing
repurchase transactions. One credit
union requested that the final rule
permit FCUs that are well capitalized
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
under part 702 but that do not have a
CAMEL rating of 1 or 2 to enter these
transactions without a maturity
mismatch limitation, provided the
assets pledged are guaranteed by a
governmental agency or governmentsponsored enterprise. One credit union
trade association did not support any
minimum experience requirements for
staff involved in the analysis and
ongoing risk management of borrowing
repurchase transactions, arguing that
FCUs should have the flexibility to hire
qualified personnel without comparing
the applicant to a predetermined set of
NCUA criteria.
The final rule makes no substantive
change to the proposed rule. It does
clarify, however, that when an FCU
purchases investments that have
mismatched maturities under borrowing
repurchase agreements, the aggregate or
total value of purchased investments
made under these conditions cannot
exceed the FCU’s net worth. Therefore,
under the final rule, an FCU may
purchase investments with maturities
exceeding the maturity of the borrowing
repurchase transaction if the aggregate
amount of all such purchased
investments does not exceed its net
worth. The Board notes that the final
rule does not create an exception for
purchased investments that are
guaranteed by a government agency or
government-sponsored entity because
the conditions on maturity mismatches
are intended to address interest rate
risk, rather than default risk. The
suggested exception would not further
the Board’s goal. In addition, the final
rule does not include experience
requirements. The Board again reminds
FCUs, however, that they should
position themselves, through in-house
or contracted expertise, to properly
engage in the analysis and ongoing risk
management of borrowing repurchase
transactions.
3. Commercial Mortgage Related
Security (CMRS)
Pursuant to section 107(15)(B) of the
Act, a RegFlex FCU had been permitted
to purchase CMRS that are not
otherwise permitted by section 107(7)(E)
of the Act if: (i) the security is rated in
one of the two highest rating categories
by at least one nationally-recognized
statistical rating organization (NRSRO);
(ii) the security meets the definition of
mortgage related security as defined in
15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(41) and the definition
of CMRS in § 703.2; (iii) the pool of
loans underlying the CMRS contains
more than 50 loans with no one loan
representing more than 10 percent of the
pool; and (iv) the FCU does not
purchase an aggregate amount of CMRS
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31985
in excess of 50 percent of its net worth.
12 CFR 742.4(a)(6). In the NPRM, the
Board proposed to permit FCUs meeting
the well capitalized standard to
purchase private label CMRS under
these same conditions.
The Board also proposed to permit an
FCU not meeting the well capitalized
standard to purchase private label
CMRS under the conditions applicable
to well capitalized FCUs, but it limited
the aggregate amount of CMRS to 25
percent of the FCU’s net worth. The
NPRM permitted such an FCU to seek
authorization from its regional director
to purchase a greater amount of CMRS,
up to 50 percent of its net worth, if it
could demonstrate three consecutive
years of effective CMRS portfolio
management and the ability to evaluate
key risk factors. The proposed rule also
added a grandfather provision for
private label CMRS purchased by an
FCU under its RegFlex authority before
the effective date of the final rule. In the
NPRM, the Board sought comment on
whether the conditions for purchasing
CMRS should be enhanced to encourage
diversity and mitigate risk.
One league and one credit union
supported the changes for CMRS as
proposed. One credit union trade
association advocated additional
authority for FCUs in this area and
supported removal of limitations on
CMRS that are not required by the Act.
One credit union stated its particular
concern with the proposal because it
believes the failure of the corporate
credit union system was caused by
significant concentrations of private
label mortgage related securities. The
commenter stated that the proposed rule
lacks sufficient guidance related to
credit risk management. It suggested
that, at a minimum, the rule require:
pre-purchase credit analysis, including
analysis of underlying collateral,
geographic diversification, cash flows,
and credit structures, as well as
identification and general avoidance of
subordinated tranches that represent
elevated levels of credit risk in favor of
senior tranches; documentation and
retention of credit analyses for as long
as an FCU holds the CMRS; and ongoing
credit monitoring to identify emerging
negative trends and potential concerns.
While the Board does not incorporate
these conditions in the final rule, the
Board strongly believes the commenter
has identified best practices to which
FCUs should adhere if they are to
purchase CMRS. The Board adopts the
provisions regarding CMRS in the final
rule as proposed.
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
31986
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
e. Eligible Obligations
The eligible obligations rule permits
an FCU to purchase loans from any
source, provided that two conditions are
satisfied. 12 CFR 701.23. First, the
borrower is a member of that FCU.
Second, the loan is either of a type the
FCU is empowered to grant or the FCU
refinances the loan within 60 days of its
purchase so that it meets the
empowered to grant requirement. 12
CFR 701.23(b)(1)(i). The rule also
permits an FCU to purchase student
loans and real estate-secured loans, from
any source, if the purchasing FCU grants
these loans on an ongoing basis and is
purchasing either type of loan to
facilitate the packaging of a pool of such
loans for sale or pledge in the secondary
market. 12 CFR 701.23(b)(1)(iii)–(iv). An
FCU may also purchase the obligations
of a liquidating credit union’s
individual members from the
liquidating credit union. 12 CFR
701.23(b)(ii). The eligible obligations
rule restricts the aggregate amount of
loans that an FCU may purchase to five
percent of the purchasing FCU’s
unimpaired capital and surplus. 12 CFR
701.23(b)(3). It excludes certain types of
loans from this limit, including loans
purchased to facilitate a sale or pledge
in the secondary market. 12 CFR
701.23(b)(3).
RegFlex FCUs have been permitted to
buy loans from other federally insured
credit unions without regard to whether
the loans are eligible obligations of the
purchasing FCU’s members or the
members of a liquidating credit union.
12 CFR 742.4(b). Loans purchased from
a liquidating credit union, however, are
subject to the cap of five percent of
unimpaired capital and surplus. 12 CFR
742.4(b)(4); 66 FR 15055, 15059 (Mar.
15, 2001). RegFlex FCUs also have been
able to purchase student loans and real
estate-secured loans without the
requirement that loans be purchased to
facilitate a secondary market pool
package. 12 CFR 742.4(b).
The NPRM retained the flexibility
currently provided to RegFlex FCUs for
FCUs meeting the well capitalized
standard. The proposed rule also
grandfathered all eligible obligations
purchased by RegFlex FCUs before the
effective date of the final rule. The
proposed rule similarly amended
paragraph (e) in § 723.1 to address
nonmember business loans purchased
under RegFlex authority or obligations
purchased under proposed
§ 701.23(b)(2). The Board requested
specific comment on whether it should
extend the flexibility from the eligible
obligations rule to all FCUs or establish
an approval process through regional
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
directors for FCUs not meeting the well
capitalized standard.
One league supported the expansion
in the eligible obligations rule. One
credit union trade association
recommended, at a minimum, an
expansion of this authority to allow
FCUs that are somewhat less than well
capitalized to take advantage of the
flexibility afforded to FCUs meeting the
well capitalized standard. Likewise, one
league and one credit union commenter
urged NCUA to extend the flexibility for
eligible obligations to all FCUs or
provide a waiver process similar to the
process for other expanded authorities.
One commenter stated that eligible
obligation purchases that are made after
an FCU applies proper due diligence do
not pose a safety and soundness issue
for that FCU or the National Credit
Union Share Insurance Fund. The credit
union commenter also urged NCUA to
expand the purchasing authority to all
FCUs so they can benefit from the
stabilizing effects of purchasing wellperforming obligations from diverse
portfolios of other federally insured
credit unions. The commenter further
stated that an expansion would enhance
safety and soundness in two ways. First,
a purchasing FCU can increase earnings
by deploying excess liquidity into
higher yielding, high quality assets
when loan demand from its members
may be low. Second, a purchasing FCU
can reduce concentration risk because
selling institutions have different fields
of membership. The commenter also
made suggestions to clarify the
proposed regulatory text in § 701.23.
The final rule substantively adopts
the provisions in the proposed rule
pertaining to eligible obligations with
two changes. It includes a provision that
allows FCUs not meeting the well
capitalized standard to seek authority
from their regional directors to purchase
obligations from other federally insured
credit unions under the same conditions
applicable to FCUs that do meet the
well capitalized standard. The final rule
also uses plain language rather than
paragraph citations within § 701.23 for
ease of reading.
III. Final Rule
a. RegFlex
The final rule removes part 742 from
title 12 to eliminate RegFlex as the
Board proposed in the NPRM. The
Board noted in the preamble to the
proposed rule that it would address the
appeals process before NCUA’s
Supervisory Review Committee for
RegFlex designation revocations. In a
separate, contemporaneous rulemaking,
the Board is amending NCUA
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement 11–1, 76 FR 23871 (Apr. 29,
2011), to remove RegFlex appeals from
the purview of the committee because
RegFlex no longer exists as of the
effective date of this rule.
b. Charitable Contributions
The final rule removes the entire
charitable contributions rule, § 701.25,
from part 701. With the deletion of this
section, an FCU will no longer be
restricted by regulation to make
donations only to certain recipients and
will not be required to obtain prior
approval from its board of directors. An
FCU’s authority to make donations will
continue to be governed by its
incidental powers authority under the
Act, the fiduciary duties of its board,
and its bylaws. NCUA has long
recognized an FCU’s authority to make
charitable contributions and donations
because an FCU may ‘‘exercise such
incidental powers as shall be necessary
or requisite to enable it to carry on
effectively the business for which it is
incorporated.’’ 44 FR 56691 (Oct. 2,
1979); 64 FR 19441 (Apr. 21, 1999); 12
U.S.C. 1757(17). Contributions,
therefore, must be necessary or requisite
to enable the FCU to effectively carry on
its business. 12 CFR 721.2. Furthermore,
FCU directors have a fiduciary duty to
direct management to operate within
sound business practices and the best
interests of the membership under
§ 701.4. In addition, article XVI, section
4 of the FCU Bylaws prohibits FCU
directors, committee members, officers,
agents, and employees from conflicts of
interest that could arise in the context
of making charitable donations.
As noted, the making of charitable
contributions has long been recognized
by NCUA as an approved incidental
power. The final rule, therefore, amends
§ 721.3 by adding a new paragraph (b)
to identify this authority and renumbers
the remaining activities in the section.
c. Nonmember Deposits
The final rule raises the dollar
threshold on the nonmember deposit
limit in § 701.32(b) from $1.5 million to
$3 million. The maximum amount of all
public unit and nonmember shares that
any FCU may hold cannot exceed the
greater of 20 percent of the FCU’s total
shares or $3 million. Unlike the former
RegFlex rule, the final rule does not
provide a standardized exemption from
the nonmember deposit cap. Section
701.32, however, continues to permit an
FCU to request from its regional director
an exemption to exceed the limit on the
maximum amount of nonmember
deposits. 12 CFR 701.32(b)(3)–(5). If the
regional director denies the request for
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
an exemption, the FCU may appeal the
decision to the Board. 12 CFR
701.32(b)(5).
d. Fixed Assets
The final rule amends § 701.36(b)(2)
to permit any FCU a six-year time frame
to partially occupy the premises if the
FCU acquired unimproved land for its
future expansion. As in the current rule,
premises are partially occupied when
the FCU is using some part of the space
on a full-time basis. An FCU may
request a waiver from the partial
occupation requirement. The
amendment applies only to unimproved
real property and does not apply to any
other kind of premises.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
e. Zero-Coupon Investments
In order to balance the risk
management concerns discussed in the
NPRM, the final rule restricts FCUs
meeting the well capitalized standard
from purchasing any zero-coupon
investment with a maturity date greater
than 30 years. It also provides that an
FCU not meeting the well capitalized
standard may not purchase a zerocoupon investment with a maturity date
that is more than 10 years from the
related settlement date, unless it has
received approval from its regional
director to purchase such an investment
with a greater maturity. In addition, the
final rule grandfathers zero-coupon
investments purchased under RegFlex
authority before the effective date of this
rule.
FCUs considering the purchase of
zero-coupon investments should be
familiar with the dramatic rise in
percentage loss on these investments
with maturity. Only FCUs with the
appropriate level of expertise positioned
to measure the safety and soundness of
purchasing zero-coupon investments
with extended maturities should
consider such investments.
f. Borrowing Repurchase Transactions
Section 703.13(d)(3)(iii) of the final
rule permits FCUs meeting the well
capitalized standard to purchase
investments with maturities exceeding
the maturity of the borrowing
repurchase transaction. Section
703.13(d)(3)(ii) permits FCUs not
meeting the well capitalized standard to
enter into borrowing repurchase
transactions and use the proceeds to
purchase investments with maturities
no more than 30 days later than the
transaction’s term. Under § 703.20, these
FCUs may request additional authority
from their regional directors to enter
transactions whereby the maturity
mismatch would be greater than 30
days. The final rule also clarifies that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
the total value of investments that any
FCU purchases through transactions
with mismatched maturities cannot
exceed its net worth. In addition, the
final rule contains a grandfather
provision for borrowing repurchase
transactions into which an FCU entered
under its RegFlex authority before the
effective date of this rule.
The final rule, therefore, sets out three
possible scenarios for borrowing
repurchase transactions under
§ 703.13(d)(3). In the first instance, the
borrowing and corresponding
investment transactions must have
matched maturities. In the second
instance, the matched maturity
requirement would not apply if an FCU
buys investments that mature no more
than 30 days after the maturity of the
borrowing repurchase transaction and
the aggregate or total value of those
investments does not exceed 100
percent of the FCU’s net worth. In the
third instance, an FCU that meets the
well capitalized standard may enter
borrowing repurchase transactions with
mismatched maturities greater than 30
days if the total value of investments
purchased through transactions with
mismatched maturities does not exceed
100 percent of the FCU’s net worth.
g. CMRS
The final rule removes the prohibition
in § 703.16 on the purchase of private
label CMRS. The final rule permits an
FCU that meets the well capitalized
standard to purchase CMRS that are not
otherwise permitted by section 107(7)(E)
of the Act if: (i) the security is rated in
one of the two highest rating categories
by at least one NRSRO; 1 (ii) the security
meets the definition of mortgage related
security as defined in 15 U.S.C.
78c(a)(41) and the definition of CMRS in
§ 703.2; (iii) the pool of loans
underlying the CMRS contains more
than 50 loans with no one loan
representing more than 10 percent of the
pool; and (iv) the FCU does not
purchase an aggregate amount of CMRS
in excess of 50 percent of its net worth.
The final rule provides that an FCU that
does not meet the well capitalized
standard may purchase private label
CMRS under conditions (i) through (iii)
above, but limits the aggregate amount
of private label CMRS to 25 percent of
1 As
required by Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank), the Board issued a proposal on
March 1, 2011 to change this prong in part 742 with
the following language: ‘‘The issuer has at least a
very strong capacity to meet its financial
obligations, even under adverse economic
conditions, for the projected life of the security.’’ 76
FR 11164 (Mar. 1, 2011). When NCUA adopts a
final rule for the proposed rulemaking issued in
March 2011, the standard will change accordingly.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31987
its net worth. Section 703.20 establishes
an approval process so that such an FCU
may seek authorization from its regional
director to purchase a greater amount of
CMRS, up to a maximum of 50% of its
net worth. As part of its request for
approval, an FCU must demonstrate
three consecutive years of effective
CMRS portfolio management and the
ability to evaluate key risk factors.
Finally, the final rule adds a
grandfather provision to § 703.18 for
private label CMRS purchased by an
FCU under its RegFlex authority before
the effective date of this rule. As such,
an FCU that does not meet the well
capitalized standard, but which holds
private label CMRS in excess of 25% of
its net worth on the effective date of this
rule, is not required to divest those
holdings on its books. The FCU,
however, cannot make additional
purchases of CMRS while its aggregate
CMRS holdings exceed 25% of its net
worth, without the approval from the
appropriate regional director under
§ 703.20.
The Board notes again that the
authority to purchase private label
CMRS, as with all of the flexibilities in
the final rule, is not appropriate for
every FCU. Selection of CMRS
consistent with safety and soundness
requires careful analysis of the
underlying commercial mortgages and
corresponding collateral, as well as
analysis of the cash flow, credit
structure, and market performance of
the security.
As with all investments, FCUs must
understand and be capable of managing
the risks associated with CMRS before
purchasing them. The investment rule’s
§ 703.3 requires an FCU’s board of
directors to develop investment policies
that address credit, liquidity, interest
rate, and concentration risks. 12 CFR
703.3. The policy must also identify the
characteristics of any investments that
are suitable for the FCU. FCUs that
purchase CMRS must develop sound
risk management policies and construct
limits that represent the FCU board’s
risk tolerance. If necessary, NCUA may
require an FCU to divest its investments
or assets for substantive safety and
soundness reasons, on a case-by-case
basis.
h. Eligible Obligations
The final rule renumbers § 701.23
and, under paragraph (b)(2), permits
FCUs that meet the well capitalized
standard to buy loans from other
federally insured credit unions without
regard to whether the loans are eligible
obligations of the purchasing FCU’s
members or the members of a
liquidating credit union. The final rule
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
31988
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
subjects loans purchased from a
liquidating credit union to the eligible
obligations cap of five percent of
unimpaired capital and surplus. FCUs
meeting the well capitalized standard
may also purchase student loans and
real estate-secured loans without the
requirement that the loans be purchased
to facilitate a secondary market pool
package. The final rule also grandfathers
all obligations purchased under RegFlex
authority before the effective date of this
rule and makes a similar amendment to
paragraph (e) in § 723.1 to address
nonmember business loans purchased
under RegFlex authority or obligations
under § 701.23(b)(2).
In addition, the final rule permits
FCUs that do not meet the well
capitalized standard to request authority
from their regional directors to engage
in this activity through a written request
similar to the process created in
paragraph (b) of § 703.20.
IV. The Interim Final Rule and Request
for Comment
In issuing the proposed rule, NCUA
inadvertently omitted changes to
RegFlex references in its rule setting the
permissible deductible for fidelity bond
coverage. 12 CFR 713.6. That rule
establishes a formula for calculating the
maximum allowable deductible based
on asset size with a cap of $200,000, but
permits RegFlex FCUs a higher
maximum deductible of up to $1
million. 12 CFR 713.6(a)(1), (c). With
the elimination of RegFlex, the Board is
issuing an interim final rule to amend
the fidelity bond rule so that it is
consistent with the other subjectspecific rules discussed in this
preamble. The interim final rule
changes the applicable benchmark for
increased deductible limits in § 713.6
from RegFlex FCUs to FCUs meeting the
same well capitalized standard used in
the other rules impacted by the
elimination of RegFlex.
The amendments track those that the
Board makes in the final rule, as well as
the § 713.6 provisions the Board
adopted in 2005 for FCUs that
automatically qualified for a RegFlex
designation. 70 FR 61713 (Oct. 26, 2005)
The interim final rule permits a
maximum deductible for fidelity bond
coverage of $1 million if the FCU has:
(1) Received a composite CAMEL rating
of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ during its last two full
examinations and (2) maintained a
‘‘well capitalized’’ net worth
classification for the immediately
preceding six quarters or has remained
‘‘well capitalized’’ for the immediately
preceding six quarters after applying the
applicable RBNW requirement.
Once a year, an FCU meeting the
interim final rule’s well capitalized
standard must review its continued
eligibility for a higher deductible under
the rule, which is the same approach
applied by the Board when it adopted
the fidelity bond RegFlex provisions in
2005. Id. at 61714. An FCU’s continued
eligibility will be based on its asset size
as reflected in its most recent year-end
5300 call report and its net worth as
reflected in that same report. If an FCU
that previously qualified for the higher
deductible has a decrease in assets
based on its most recent year-end 5300
call report or its net worth has
decreased so that it would no longer
qualify under the well capitalized
standard in the rule, then it must obtain
the coverage otherwise required by
§ 713.6. Likewise, if an FCU meets the
assets threshold and its net worth would
otherwise continue to qualify it for the
well capitalized standard, but it failed to
receive either a CAMEL rating of 1 or 2
during its most recent examination
report, it must obtain the required
coverage with a deductible of no more
than $200,000.
Final rule authority
FCUs meeting well capitalized standard
Charitable Contributions .....................................
Well capitalized FCUs may make donations
consistent with their incidental powers authority and board’s fiduciary duties.
May accept up to the greater of 20% total
shares or $3 million. May request exemption from regional director for greater
amount.
May take up to six years to partially occupy
unimproved real property purchased for future expansion.
May purchase zero-coupon investments with
maturity dates up to 30 years.
Nonmember Deposits .........................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
Unimproved Property for Future Expansion .......
Zero-coupon Investments* .................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Board is adopting this rulemaking
as an interim final rule because it meets
the good cause exception to the
procedures under the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3).
Notice and public procedures are
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest in this matter because the final
rule eliminates RegFlex. To maintain
cross-references to RegFlex in the
fidelity bond coverage rule would cause
confusion in implementation by FCUs,
as well as undue and untimely
execution of NCUA’s functions in
monitoring compliance with § 713.6.
The interim final rule complements the
final rule, and it is appropriate for the
Board to synchronize its adoption of all
of the rule changes made in this
document. The Board finds these
reasons are good cause to dispense with
the APA’s notice and comment period
and the procedures in NCUA’s
Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement 87–2. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B);
52 FR 35213 (Sept. 18, 1987), as
amended by 68 FR 31949 (May 29,
2003). The interim final rule has an
effective date 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register, which coincides
with the final rule’s effective date.
Although the rule is being issued as an
interim final rule, the Board encourages
interested parties to submit comments
within 60 days so the Board can
consider any amendments to the rule.
V. Rule Summary Table
In a further effort to comply with the
Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
274), the Board includes the following
table to assist readers by distinguishing
the authorities for FCUs that meet the
well capitalized standard and FCUs that
do not. We are providing this table for
your reference only. Please refer to
regulatory text, as well as the preambles
for the NPRM and the final rule, for
specific information.
FCUs not meeting well capitalized standard
This flexibility applies to all FCUs.
This flexibility applies to all FCUs.
This flexibility applies to all FCUs.
May purchase zero-coupon investments with
maturity dates up to 10 years. May request
authority from regional director for maturities up to 30 years.
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
31989
Final rule authority
FCUs meeting well capitalized standard
FCUs not meeting well capitalized standard
Borrowing Repurchase Transaction* ..................
May enter into Borrowing Repurchase Transactions where the underlying investments
mature later than the borrowing, provided
the total amount of investments purchased
do not exceed 100 percent of net worth.
Private Label Commercial Mortgage Related
Security (CMRS)*.
Not restricted to purchasing only CMRS
issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. May
purchase Private Label CMRS if:
(i) the security is rated in one of the two highest rating categories by at least one
NRSRO;
(ii) it is a ‘‘mortgage related security’’ under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
§ 703.2;
May enter into Borrowing Repurchase Transactions where the underlying investments
mature no later than 30 days after the borrowing, provided the total amount of investments purchased do not exceed 100 percent of net worth. May request authority
from regional director for longer maturity
mismatch.
Similar flexibilities apply to all FCUs, under
the following conditions:
Requirements (i)–(iii) would be the same as
for Well Capitalized FCUs.
The limit in requirement (iv) is 25 percent of
net worth. May request approval from the
regional director for higher limit, up to 50
percent of net worth, if FCU has 3 consecutive years of effective CMRS portfolio management and the ability to evaluate key risk
factors.
Purchase of Eligible Obligations * ......................
Fidelity Bond Coverage—Maximum Deductible
for FCUs with Over $1 million in Assets.
(iii) the pool of loans underlying the CMRS
contains more than 50 loans with no one
loan representing more than 10 percent of
the pool; and
(iv) the FCU does not purchase an aggregate
amount in excess of 50 percent of net
worth.
In addition to the authority in the current
§ 701.23, may buy loans from other federally insured credit unions without regard to
whether the loans are obligations of the
purchasing FCU’s members. May also purchase nonmember student loans and real
estate loans without the need for purchase
to facilitate a secondary market pool package. Also may purchase loans from a liquidating credit union regardless of whether
the loans were made to liquidating CU’s
members, subject to the aggregate cap on
eligible obligations of 5 percent of
unimpaired capital and surplus.
$2,000 plus 1/1000 of total assets up to a
maximum of $1,000,000.
These flexibilities may be extended if approved by regional director, otherwise limited to the other provisions of § 701.23 for
purchasing eligible obligations (subject to
membership or pooling requirements)
$2,000 plus 1/1000 of total assets up to a
maximum of $200,000.
* All authorized activity entered into before the effective date of the final rule is grandfathered.
VI. Regulatory Procedures
a. Regulatory Flexibility Act
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a rule may have on a substantial
number of small entities (primarily
those under ten million dollars in
assets). This rule reduces compliance
burden and extends regulatory relief
while maintaining existing safety and
soundness standards. NCUA has
determined and certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
credit unions.
b. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) applies to rulemakings in which
an agency by rule creates a new
paperwork burden on regulated entities
or modifies an existing burden. 44
U.S.C. 3507(d); 5 CFR part 1320. For
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
purposes of the PRA, a paperwork
burden may take the form of either a
reporting or a recordkeeping
requirement, both referred to as
information collections. As required,
NCUA has applied to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval of the information collection
requirement described below.
The final rule contains an information
collection in the form of a voluntary
written request for additional
authorities from a regional director
under proposed § 703.20 and
§ 701.23(h). An FCU that does not meet
the well capitalized standard may
submit a written request to its regional
director to request expanded authority
above any or all of the following
provisions in the rule: (1) The
borrowing repurchase transaction
maximum maturity mismatch of 30 days
under proposed § 703.13(d)(3)(ii), (2) the
zero-coupon investment 10-year
maximum maturity under proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 703.14(i), up to a maturity of no more
than 30 years, (3) the aggregate
commercial mortgage related security
limit of 25% of net worth under
proposed § 703.14(j), up to no more than
50% of net worth, and (4) the
membership and pooling limitations in
§ 701.23(b)(1) when purchasing loans
under § 701.23(b)(2). An FCU meets the
well capitalized standard if the FCU has
received a composite CAMEL rating of
‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ during its last two full
examinations and (1) has maintained a
‘‘well capitalized’’ net worth
classification for the immediately
preceding six quarters, or (2) has
remained ‘‘well capitalized’’ for the
immediately preceding six quarters after
applying the applicable RBNW
requirement. In the proposed rule, the
Board estimated 1,770 FCUs may apply
for an additional authority. The
cumulative total annual paperwork
burden is estimated to be approximately
1,770 hours.
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
31990
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
OMB is currently reviewing NCUA’s
submission and NCUA will publish the
OMB number assigned to this
rulemaking once issued.
c. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. NCUA, an
independent regulatory agency as
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily
complies with the executive order to
adhere to fundamental federalism
principles. This final rule will not have
a substantial direct effect on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–121) provides generally for
congressional review of agency rules. A
reporting requirement is triggered in
instances where NCUA issues a final
rule as defined by Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C.
551. The Office of Management and
Budget has determined that this rule is
not a major rule for purposes of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996.
e. Assessment of Federal Regulations
and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this final
IRPS will not affect family well-being
within the meaning of Section 654 of
the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law
105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions.
12 CFR Part 703
Credit unions, Investments.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
12 CFR Part 713
Credit unions, Insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 721
Credit unions.
12 CFR Part 723
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on May 24, 2012.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons discussed above,
NCUA amends 12 CFR parts 701, 703,
713, 721, 723, and 742 as follows:
PART 701—ORGANIZATION AND
OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
1. The authority citation for part 701
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756,
1757, 1759, 1761a, 1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782,
1784, 1787, and 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31
is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.,
42 U.S.C. 1861 and 42 U.S.C. 3601–3610.
Section 701.35 is also authorized by 42
U.S.C. 4311–4312.
2. In § 701.23:
a. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(2) and
(3) as paragraphs (b)(3) and (4);
■ b. Add new paragraph (b)(2):
■ c. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(4) introductory text, remove the
phrase ‘‘under paragraph (b) of this
section’’ and add in its place ‘‘under
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2)(ii) of this
section’’;
■ d. Add paragraph (b)(5);
■ e. Add paragraph (h).
The additions read as follows:
■
■
d. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12 CFR Part 742
Credit unions, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
§ 701.23 Purchase, sale, and pledge of
eligible obligations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Purchase of obligations from a
FICU. A federal credit union that
received a composite CAMEL rating of
‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ for the last two (2) full
examinations and maintained a net
worth classification of ‘‘well
capitalized’’ under Part 702 of this
chapter for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters or, if subject to a
risk-based net worth (RBNW)
requirement under Part 702 of this
chapter, has remained ‘‘well
capitalized’’ for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters after applying the
applicable RBNW requirement may
purchase and hold the following
obligations, provided that it would be
empowered to grant them:
(i) Eligible obligations. Eligible
obligations without regard to whether
they are obligations of its members,
provided they are purchased from a
federally-insured credit union and the
obligations are either:
(A) Loans the purchasing credit union
is empowered to grant; or
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(B) Loans refinanced with the consent
of the borrowers, within 60 days after
they are purchased, so that they are
loans the purchasing credit union is
empowered to grant;
(ii) Eligible obligations of a liquidating
credit union. Eligible obligations of a
liquidating credit union without regard
to whether they are obligations of the
liquidating credit union’s members.
(iii) Student loans. Student loans
provided they are purchased from a
federally-insured credit union only;
(iv) Real estate-secured loans. Real
estate-secured loans provided they are
purchased from a federally-insured
credit union only;
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Grandfathered purchases. Subject
to safety and soundness considerations,
a federal credit union may hold any of
the loans described in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section provided it was
authorized to purchase the loan and
purchased the loan before July 2, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Additional authority. (1) A federal
credit union may submit a written
request to its regional director seeking
expanded authority to purchase loans
described in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, if it is not otherwise authorized
by this section. The written request
must include the following:
(i) A copy of the credit union’s
purchase policy;
(ii) The types of eligible obligations
under paragraph (b)(2) of this section
that the credit union seeks to purchase;
(iii) An explanation of the need for
additional authority; and
(iv) An analysis of the credit union’s
prior experience with the purchase of
eligible obligations.
(2) Approval process. A regional
director will provide a written
determination on a request for expanded
authority within 60 calendar days after
receipt of the request; however, the 60day period will not begin until the
requesting credit union has submitted
all necessary information to the regional
director. The regional director will
inform the requesting credit union, in
writing, of the date the request was
received and of any additional
documentation that the regional director
requires in support of the request. If the
regional director approves the request,
the regional director will establish a
limit on loan purchases as appropriate
and subject to the limitations in this
section. If the regional director does not
notify the credit union of the action
taken on its request within 60 calendar
days of the receipt of the request or the
receipt of additional requested
supporting information, whichever
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
occurs later, the credit union may
purchase loans it requested under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(3) Appeal to NCUA Board. A federal
credit union may appeal any part of the
determination made under this
paragraph to the NCUA Board by
submitting its appeal through the
regional director within 30 days of the
date of the determination.
§ 701.25
■
[Removed and Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve § 701.25.
§ 701.32
[Amended]
4. In § 701.32 amend paragraph (b)(1)
by removing ‘‘$1.5 million’’ after the
words ‘‘federal credit union’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘$3 million’’.
■ 5. Amend § 701.36 by revising
paragraph (b)(2) and removing
paragraph (d) and redesignating
paragraph (e) as paragraph (d):
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 701.36
FCU ownership of fixed assets.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) When a federal credit union
acquires premises for future expansion,
it must partially occupy the premises
within a reasonable period, not to
exceed three years, unless the credit
union has acquired unimproved real
property for future expansion. If a
federal credit union has acquired
unimproved real property to develop for
future expansion, it must partially
occupy the premises within a
reasonable period, not to exceed six
years. Premises are partially occupied
when the credit union is using some
part of the space on a full-time basis.
The NCUA may waive this partial
occupation requirement in writing upon
written request. The request must be
made within 30 months after the
property is acquired.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 703—INVESTMENTS AND
DEPOSIT ACTIVITIES
6. The authority citation for part 703
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757(7), 1757(8),
1757(15).
7. In § 703.13, revise paragraph (d)(3)
to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
■
§ 703.13
Permissible investment activities.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) The investments referenced in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section must
mature under the following conditions:
(i) No later than the maturity of the
borrowing repurchase transaction;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
(ii) No later than thirty days after the
borrowing repurchase transaction,
unless authorized under § 703.20,
provided the value of all investments
purchased with maturities later than
borrowing repurchase transactions does
not exceed 100 percent of the federal
credit union’s net worth; or
(iii) At any time later than the
maturity of the borrowing repurchase
transaction, provided the value of all
investments purchased with maturities
later than borrowing repurchase
transactions does not exceed 100
percent of the federal credit union’s net
worth and the credit union received a
composite CAMEL rating of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’
for the last two (2) full examinations
and maintained a net worth
classification of ‘‘well capitalized’’
under part 702 of this chapter for the six
(6) immediately preceding quarters or, if
subject to a risk-based net worth
(RBNW) requirement under part 702 of
this chapter, has remained ‘‘well
capitalized’’ for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters after applying the
applicable RBNW requirement.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 703.14 by adding
paragraphs (i) and (j) to read as follows:
§ 703.14
Permissible investments.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Zero-coupon investments. A
federal credit union may only purchase
a zero-coupon investment with a
maturity date that is no greater than 10
years from the related settlement date,
unless authorized under § 703.20 or
otherwise provided in this paragraph. A
federal credit union that received a
composite CAMEL rating of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’
for the last two (2) full examinations
and maintained a net worth
classification of ‘‘well capitalized’’
under part 702 of this chapter for the six
(6) immediately preceding quarters or, if
subject to a risk-based net worth
(RBNW) requirement under part 702 of
this chapter, has remained ‘‘well
capitalized’’ for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters after applying the
applicable RBNW requirement, may
purchase a zero-coupon investment
with a maturity date that is no greater
than 30 years from the related
settlement date.
(j) Commercial mortgage related
security (CMRS). A federal credit union
may purchase a CMRS permitted by
Section 107(7)(E) of the Act; and,
pursuant to Section 107(15)(B) of the
Act, a CMRS of an issuer other than a
government-sponsored enterprise
enumerated in Section 107(7)(E) of the
Act, provided:
(1) The CMRS is rated in one of the
two highest rating categories by at least
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31991
one nationally-recognized statistical
rating organization;
(2) The CMRS meets the definition of
mortgage related security as defined in
15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(41) and the definition
of commercial mortgage related security
as defined in § 703.2 of this part;
(3) The CMRS’s underlying pool of
loans contains more than 50 loans with
no one loan representing more than 10
percent of the pool; and
(4) The aggregate amount of private
label CMRS purchased by the federal
credit union does not exceed 25 percent
of its net worth, unless authorized
under § 703.20 or as otherwise provided
in this subparagraph. A federal credit
union that has received a composite
CAMEL rating of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ for the last
two (2) full examinations and
maintained a net worth classification of
‘‘well capitalized’’ under part 702 of this
chapter for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters or, if subject to a
risk-based net worth (RBNW)
requirement under part 702 of this
chapter, has remained ‘‘well
capitalized’’ for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters after applying the
applicable RBNW requirement, may
hold private label CMRS in an aggregate
amount not to exceed 50% of its net
worth.
§ 703.16
[Amended]
9. In § 703.16, remove paragraphs (b)
and (d) and redesignate paragraphs (c),
(e), and (f) as paragraphs (b), (c), and (d)
respectively.
■
10. In § 703.18, redesignate paragraph
(b) as paragraph (c) and add new
paragraph (b) read as follows:
■
§ 703.18
Grandfathered investments.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A federal credit union may hold a
zero-coupon investment with a maturity
greater than 10 years, a borrowing
repurchase transaction in which the
investment matures at any time later
than the maturity of the borrowing, or
CMRS that cause the credit union’s
aggregate amount of CMRS from issuers
other than government-sponsored
enterprises to exceed 25% of its net
worth, in each case if it purchased the
investment or entered the transaction
under the Regulatory Flexibility
Program before July 2, 2012.
■
11. Add § 703.20 to read as follows:
§ 703.20
Request for additional authority.
(a) Additional authority. A federal
credit union may submit a written
request to its regional director seeking
expanded authority above the following
limits in this part:
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
31992
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Borrowing repurchase transaction
maximum maturity mismatch of 30 days
under § 703.13(d)(3)(ii).
(2) Zero-coupon investment 10-year
maximum maturity under § 703.14(i),
up to a maturity of no more than 30
years.
(3) CMRS aggregate limit of 25% of
net worth under § 703.14(j), up to no
more than 50% of net worth. To obtain
approval for additional authority, the
federal credit union must demonstrate
three consecutive years of effective
CMRS portfolio management and the
ability to evaluate key risk factors.
(b) Written request. A federal credit
union desiring additional authority
must submit a written request to the
NCUA regional office having
jurisdiction over the geographical area
in which the credit union’s main office
is located, that includes the following:
(1) A copy of the credit union’s
investment policy;
(2) The higher limit sought;
(3) An explanation of the need for
additional authority;
(4) Documentation supporting the
credit union’s ability to manage the
investment or activity; and
(5) An analysis of the credit union’s
prior experience with the investment or
activity.
(c) Approval process. A regional
director will provide a written
determination on a request for expanded
authority within 60 calendar days after
receipt of the request; however, the 60day period will not begin until the
requesting credit union has submitted
all necessary information to the regional
director. The regional director will
inform the requesting credit union, in
writing, of the date the request was
received and of any additional
documentation that the regional director
requires in support of the request. If the
regional director approves the request,
the regional director will establish a
limit on the investment or activity as
appropriate and subject to the
limitations in this part. If the regional
director does not notify the credit union
of the action taken on its request within
60 calendar days of the receipt of the
request or the receipt of additional
requested supporting information,
whichever occurs later, the credit union
may proceed with its proposed
investment or investment activity.
(d) Appeal to NCUA Board. A federal
credit union may appeal any part of the
determination made under paragraph (c)
to the NCUA Board by submitting its
appeal through the regional director
within 30 days of the date of the
determination.
PART 713—FIDELITY BONDS AND
INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR
FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
12. The authority citation for part 713
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1761a, 1761b, 1766(a),
1766(h), 1789(a)(11).
13. In § 713.6, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
and (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 713.6 What is the permissible
deductible?
(a)(1) The maximum amount of
allowable deductible is computed based
on a federal credit union’s asset size and
capital level, as follows:
Assets
Maximum deductible
$0 to $100,000 ........................................
$100,001 to $250,000 .............................
$250,000 to $1,000,000 ..........................
Over $1,000,000 ......................................
No deductible allowed.
$1,000.
$2,000.
$2,000 plus 1/1000 of total assets up to a maximum of $200,000; for credit unions that have received
a composite CAMEL rating of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ for the last two (2) full examinations and maintained a net
worth classification of ‘‘well capitalized’’ under part 702 of this chapter for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters or, if subject to a risk-based net worth (RBNW) requirement under part 702 of
this chapter, has remained ‘‘well capitalized’’ for the six (6) immediately preceding quarters after
applying the applicable RBNW requirement, the maximum deductible is $1,000,000.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) A federal credit union that has
received a composite CAMEL rating of
‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ for the last two (2) full
examinations and maintained a net
worth classification of ‘‘well
capitalized’’ under part 702 of this
chapter for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters or, if subject to a
risk-based net worth (RBNW)
requirement under part 702 of this
chapter, has remained ‘‘well
capitalized’’ for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters after applying the
applicable RBNW requirement is
eligible to qualify for a deductible in
excess of $200,000. The credit union’s
eligibility is determined based on it
having assets in excess of $1 million as
reflected in its most recent year-end
5300 call report. A federal credit union
that previously qualified for a
deductible in excess of $200,000, but
that subsequently fails to qualify based
on its most recent year-end 5300 call
report because either its assets have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
decreased or it no longer meets the net
worth requirements of this paragraph or
fails to meet the CAMEL rating
requirements of this paragraph as
determined by its most recent
examination report, must obtain the
coverage otherwise required by
paragraph (b) of this section within 30
days of filing its year-end call report and
must notify the appropriate NCUA
regional office in writing of its changed
status and confirm that it has obtained
the required coverage.
PART 721—INCIDENTAL POWERS
14. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757(17), 1766, 1789.
15. In § 721.3, redesignate paragraphs
(b) through (l) as paragraphs (c) through
(m) and add new paragraph (b) to read
as follows:
§ 721.3 What categories of activities are
preapproved incidental powers necessary
or requisite to carry on a credit union’s
business?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Charitable contributions and
donations. Charitable contributions and
donations are gifts you provide to assist
others through contributions of staff,
equipment, money, or other resources.
Examples of charitable contributions
include donations to community
groups, nonprofit organizations, other
credit unions or credit union affiliated
causes, political donations, as well as
donations to create charitable
foundations.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 723—MEMBER BUSINESS
LOANS
■
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16. The authority citation for part 723
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1756, 1757, 1757A,
1766, 1785, 1789.
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
17. In § 723.1 revise paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
■
§ 723.1
What is a member business loan?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Purchases of nonmember loans
and nonmember loan participations.
Any interest a credit union obtains in a
nonmember loan, pursuant to §§ 701.22
and 701.23(b)(2), under a Regulatory
Flexibility Program designation before
July 2, 2012 or other authority, is treated
the same as a member business loan for
purposes of this rule and the risk
weighting standards under part 702 of
this chapter, except that the effect of
such interest on a credit union’s
aggregate member business loan limit
will be as set forth in § 723.16(b) of this
part.
PART 742—[REMOVED]
18. Under the authority of 12 U.S.C.
1756 and 1766, the National Credit
Union Administration removes part 742.
■
[FR Doc. 2012–13212 Filed 5–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 741
RIN 3133–AE01
Loan Workouts and Nonaccrual Policy,
and Regulatory Reporting of Troubled
Debt Restructured Loans
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule; limited extension of
compliance date for certain
requirements.
AGENCY:
NCUA is amending its
regulations to require federally insured
credit unions (FICUs) to maintain
written policies that address the
management of loan workout
arrangements and nonaccrual policies
for loans, consistent with industry
practice or Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council
(FFIEC) requirements. The final rule
includes guidelines, set forth as an
interpretive ruling and policy statement
(IRPS) and incorporated as an appendix
to the rule, that will assist FICUs in
complying with the rule, including the
regulatory reporting of troubled debt
restructured loans (TDR loans or TDRs)
in FICU Call Reports.
DATES: The effective date for this rule is
July 2, 2012. The compliance date is
extended to October 1, 2012 for the
rule’s requirements to adopt written
policies addressing loan workouts and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
nonaccrual practices and to December
31, 2012 to collect nonaccrual status
data.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director of Supervision Matthew J.
Biliouris and Chief Accountant Karen
Kelbly, Office of Examination and
Insurance at the above address or
telephone: (703) 518–6360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of Comments on the Proposed
Rulemaking
III. Final Rule and IRPS
IV. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background
a. Why is NCUA issuing this rule?
In order to better serve members
experiencing financial difficulties over
the last several years and improve
collectability, FICUs worked with
members and offered sensible workout
loans, including programs offered
through the Obama Administration’s
‘‘Making Home Affordable Program’’.1
NCUA’s existing reporting requirements
creates practical challenges for the
industry as the volume of workouts
increased. To follow the NCUA 5300
Call Report (Call Report) instructions for
reporting past due status on TDRs, many
FICUs maintain separate, manual
delinquency computations. To respond
to feedback from the industry and in the
spirit of reduced regulatory burden, the
NCUA Board (Board) issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in
February. 77 FR 4927 (Feb. 1, 2012).
In the NPRM, the Board
acknowledged the need to effectively
balance appropriate loan workout
programs with safety and soundness
considerations. Such considerations can
include the inability to identify
deterioration in the quality of the loan
portfolio and delayed loss recognition,
in light of the high degree of relapse into
past due status. The Board issued the
NPRM with the goal of granting certain
regulatory relief, instituting some
countervailing controls, and clarifying
regulatory expectations.
In the NPRM, the Board proposed four
regulatory changes through an
amendment to § 741.3 and the addition
of proposed Appendix C to part 741.
1 The Making Home Affordable Program (MHA)
was developed to help homeowners avoid
foreclosure, stabilize the country’s housing market,
and improve the nation’s economy. MHA includes
such programs as the ‘‘Home Affordable Refinance
Program’’ (HARP) and ‘‘Home Affordable
Modification Program’’ (HAMP). Programs such as
these further enable FICUs to provide workout
loans to their members. For additional information
regarding programs available through MHA see
https://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/pages/
default.aspx.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31993
First, the NPRM proposed a requirement
that FICUs have written policies
addressing loan workouts and
nonaccrual practices under § 741.3.
Second, the NPRM proposed to
standardize an industry-wide practice
by requiring that FICUs cease to accrue
interest on all loans at 90 days or more
past due, subject to a few exceptions.
Third, the NPRM proposed that FICUs
maintain member business workout
loans in a nonaccrual status until the
FICU receives 6 consecutive payments
under the modified terms. Finally, the
NPRM proposed that FICUs calculate
and report TDR loan delinquency based
on restructured contract terms rather
than the original loan terms. To that
end, the Board noted that NCUA would
modify the Call Report to reduce data
collection to TDRs as defined by GAAP.
b. When will FICUs have to comply with
the final rule?
The Board proposed that the final rule
would go into effect 120 days after it
was published in the Federal Register
and require that FICUs adopt the
required written lending policies by
such date. The NPRM also stated that
NCUA would closely time its
adjustments to the Call Report
requirements for reporting TDRs with
the rule and stated a goal for the Call
Report requirements to go into effect no
later than the quarter ending December
31, 2012. The NPRM specifically sought
comments on the proposed
implementation dates.
In response to the NPRM, the Board
received many varied comments on how
it should approach implementation of
the rule, appendix and NCUA’s
modification of the Call Report. One
trade group urged NCUA to move
forward with Call Report changes as
soon as it adopted the rule, while a
FICU supported the Call Report
reporting requirements to become
effective no later than December 31,
2012. One FICU commenter stated that
the quick adoption of the proposed
changes would have a profound effect
on FICU personnel hours needed to
perform the TDR reporting requirement
and, therefore, requested
implementation of the final rule by the
end of the 2nd quarter of 2012.
Likewise, another FICU stated that the
December 31, 2012 report date would
not give FICUs enough time to purchase
software and perform a six-month due
diligence review. The FICU noted that,
while a new system can effectively
capture new loan history, it will have
serious challenges with systematically
capturing existing loan history
retrospectively for data previously
tracked manually. The commenter
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31981-31993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13212]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 701, 703, 713, 721, 723, and 742
RIN 3133-AD98
Eligible Obligations, Charitable Contributions, Nonmember
Deposits, Fixed Assets, Investments, Fidelity Bonds, Incidental Powers,
Member Business Loans, and Regulatory Flexibility Program
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule and interim final rule with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is removing certain regulations and eliminating the
Regulatory Flexibility Program (RegFlex) to provide regulatory relief
to federal credit unions. NCUA is also removing or amending related
rules to ease compliance burden while retaining certain safety and
soundness standards. Those rules pertain to eligible obligations,
charitable contributions, nonmember deposits, fixed assets,
investments, incidental powers, and member business loans. In addition,
NCUA is issuing an interim final rule with a request for comment to
amend a provision in the fidelity bond rule to remove references to
RegFlex.
DATES: Effective dates: The final rule, as well as the interim final
rule pertaining to the revisions in the fidelity bond rule, Sec.
713.6, will go into effect on July 2, 2012.
Comment date: We will consider comments on the interim final rule
portion (the fidelity bond rule, Sec. 713.6), as discussed in section
IV of the preamble of this rulemaking. Send your comments to reach us
on or before July 30, 2012. We may not consider comments received after
the above date in making any decision whether to amend the interim
final rule.
ADDRESSES: In commenting on the interim final rule, you may submit
comments by any of the following methods (Please send comments by one
method only):
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
NCUA Web Site: https://www.ncua.gov/Legal/Regs/Pages/PropRegs.aspx. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Address to regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ``[Your
name] Comments on Interim Final Rule, Section 713.6, Fidelity Bond'' in
the email subject line.
Fax: (703) 518-6319. Use the subject line described above
for email.
Mail: Address to Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314-3428.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail address.
Public Inspection: You can view all public comments on NCUA's Web
site at https://www.ncua.gov/Legal/Regs/Pages/PropRegs.aspx as
submitted, except for those we cannot post for technical reasons. NCUA
will not edit or remove any identifying or contact information from the
public comments submitted. You may inspect paper copies of comments in
NCUA's law library at 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, by
appointment weekdays between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. To make an appointment,
call (703) 518-6546 or send an email to OGCMail@ncua.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chrisanthy Loizos, Staff Attorney,
Office of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone (703) 518-
6540, or Matthew J. Biliouris, Director of Supervision, or J. Owen
Cole, Director, Division of Capital Markets, Office of Examination and
Insurance, at the above address or telephone (703) 518-6360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of Comments on December 2011 Proposed Rule
III. Final Rule
IV. Interim Final Rule and Request for Comment
V. Rule Summary Table
VI. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background
a. Why is NCUA adopting this rule?
On July 11, 2011, President Obama issued Executive Order 13579,
ordering independent agencies, including NCUA, to consider whether they
can modify, streamline, expand, or repeal existing rules to make their
programs more effective and less burdensome. Consistent with the spirit
of the Executive Order and as part of NCUA's Regulatory Modernization
Initiative, the NCUA Board (Board) is adopting this rule to streamline
its regulatory program by eliminating RegFlex. The final rule relieves
regulatory burden on federal credit unions (FCUs) because they will no
longer need to engage in any process for a RegFlex designation. In
addition, the final rule provides regulatory relief to FCUs that are
currently not RegFlex eligible because it extends to them most of the
flexibilities previously available only to RegFlex FCUs.
The Board issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in December
2011. 76 FR 81421 (Dec. 28, 2011). The comment period on the proposed
rule ended on February 27, 2012. NCUA received seventeen comment
letters on the NPRM: Four from FCUs, three from trade associations (1
representing banks, 2 representing credit unions), nine from state
credit union leagues, and one from a law firm. The majority of the
commenters supported the rulemaking generally. Four commenters did not
support the rule as proposed, and the remaining commenters offered
comments on particular provisions but did not take a position on the
initiative as a whole. For the reasons discussed below, the Board is
adopting the amendments almost exactly as proposed. As such, the Board
does not restate the legal analysis it presented in the NPRM's preamble
and incorporates it by reference here in this rulemaking. Id.
b. What was RegFlex?
The Board established RegFlex in 2002. 66 FR 58656 (Nov. 23, 2001).
RegFlex relieved FCUs from certain regulatory restrictions and granted
them additional powers if they demonstrated sustained superior
performance as measured by CAMEL rating and net worth classification.
An FCU could qualify for RegFlex treatment automatically or by
application to the appropriate regional director. Specifically, an FCU
automatically qualified for a RegFlex designation when it received a
composite CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' for two consecutive
examination cycles and maintained a net worth classification of ``well
capitalized'' under part 702 of NCUA's rules for the last six quarters.
An FCU subject to a risk-based net worth (RBNW) requirement under part
702 could also qualify for RegFlex treatment
[[Page 31982]]
if it remained ``well capitalized'' for the last six quarters after
applying the applicable RBNW requirement. FCUs that did not
automatically qualify for a RegFlex designation could seek one with the
appropriate regional director.
The rule gave RegFlex FCUs relief from restrictions in the
following six areas or ``flexibilities'': (1) Charitable contributions;
(2) nonmember deposits; (3) fixed assets; (4) zero-coupon investments;
(5) borrowing repurchase transactions; and (6) commercial mortgage
related securities (CMRS). It provided an additional flexibility by
specifically authorizing the purchase of obligations from federally
insured credit unions beyond those an FCU may purchase under the NCUA's
eligible obligations rule, Sec. 701.23. RegFlex FCUs were also
permitted a higher maximum allowable deductible for fidelity bond
coverage under Sec. 713.6.
c. What changes did NCUA propose?
The Board proposed to eliminate RegFlex and the charitable
contributions rule, and amend the rules that apply to eligible
obligations, nonmember deposits, fixed assets, and investments, so that
all FCUs could engage in activities previously permitted only for
RegFlex FCUs, subject to some conditions. 76 FR 81421 (Dec. 28, 2011).
The NPRM removed the charitable contributions rule in its entirety
and placed the remaining six flexibilities of the RegFlex rule into the
subject-specific rules that apply to all FCUs. It adjusted the
nonmember deposits rule to allow some FCUs to accept more nonmember
deposits. The proposed rule extended to six years the amount of time in
which all FCUs must occupy unimproved property under NCUA's fixed
assets rule. The proposed amendments to the investment rule permitted
extended maturities for zero-coupon investments and borrowing
repurchase transactions, as well as the purchase of CMRS under similar
conditions allowed for RegFlex FCUs. The NPRM moved the provisions to
buy nonmember and other obligations from the RegFlex rule into the
eligible obligations rule, Sec. 701.23. Lastly, the proposal made a
nonsubstantive change to the member business loan rule that cross-
references RegFlex.
While providing additional regulatory flexibility, the NPRM made a
few modifications to authorities and did not extend the full scope of
every RegFlex authority to all FCUs. The Board proposed to remove the
automatic exemption from the nonmember deposits limit that had been
granted to RegFlex FCUs. In so doing, the Board noted that the change
would not negatively impact those FCUs based on the volume of nonmember
deposits held by them.
With regard to the investment rule amendments, the NPRM created a
``well capitalized standard'' based on the automatic designation
criteria used in RegFlex. An FCU meets the well capitalized standard if
it has received a composite CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' for two
consecutive full examinations and (1) has maintained a ``well
capitalized'' net worth classification for the immediately preceding
six quarters, or (2) has remained ``well capitalized'' for the
immediately preceding six quarters after applying the applicable RBNW
requirement.
The proposed rule provided that well capitalized FCUs could
purchase zero-coupon investments with a maximum maturity of no more
than 30 years, while FCUs not meeting the standard would continue to be
subject to a maturity cap of 10 years unless they received approval
from their regional director. The NPRM permitted FCUs not meeting the
well capitalized standard to enter into borrowing repurchase
transactions in which the security purchased with the proceeds from the
borrowing agreement matured no more than 30 days after the maturity of
the borrowing, unless they received additional approval from their
regional director. Consistent with the RegFlex program, the NPRM did
not impose the 30-day mismatch restriction on FCUs meeting the well
capitalized standard. The proposal limited the amount of securities
that any FCU, whether well capitalized or not, could purchase with
mismatched maturities to 100% of the FCU's net worth. It also permitted
FCUs not meeting the well capitalized standard to purchase private
label CMRS subject to an aggregate limit of 25% of net worth, unless
their regional director granted authority to purchase securities in an
amount up to 50% of net worth, which is the cap for FCUs meeting the
well capitalized standard.
II. Summary of Comments on December 2011 Proposed Rule
A majority of commenters supported the Board's efforts to extend
regulatory flexibility to FCUs. Other commenters felt the proposal did
not provide enough relief and failed to extend similar relief to
federally insured, state-chartered credit unions. One credit union
trade association stated that the proposal removed clear eligibility
standards for FCUs to obtain expanded authorities. It opposed the
elimination of an appeals process to NCUA's Supervisory Review
Committee, similar to the one through which RegFlex FCUs could appeal
RegFlex designation revocations, if an FCU were not permitted to engage
in the full range of flexibilities. The bank trade association stated
that, although it supports efforts to reduce regulatory burdens, NCUA
should not extend such regulatory relief to FCUs that are
undercapitalized or represent supervisory concerns. Another commenter
found that the RegFlex program under part 742 sufficiently accomplished
its goals in its current form. The Board has carefully reviewed and
analyzed the comment letters and describes specific comments on the
NPRM below.
a. Charitable Contributions
In the NPRM, the Board proposed to eliminate the entire charitable
contributions rule, Sec. 701.25. Section 701.25 restricts an FCU's
ability to make donations. It only allows an FCU to make charitable
contributions or donations to nonprofit organizations located or
conducting activities in a community in which the FCU has a place of
business, or to organizations that are tax exempt under Sec. 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code and that operate primarily to promote and
develop credit unions. It further requires an FCU's board of directors
to approve charitable contributions based on a determination that the
contributions are in the FCU's best interests and are reasonable given
the FCU's size and financial condition. Under the rule, directors may
establish a budget for charitable donations and authorize FCU officials
to select recipients and disburse funds. The RegFlex rule, Sec.
742.4(a)(1), exempted RegFlex FCUs from the entire charitable
contributions rule. By removing Sec. 701.25, the Board is now allowing
any FCU to make donations without the prior approval of its board of
directors and without regulatory restrictions as to recipients.
In the NPRM, the Board noted that, even in the absence of a
charitable contributions rule, an FCU's authority to make donations is
authorized by incidental powers given in the Federal Credit Union Act
(Act), 12 U.S.C. 1757(17). As such, contributions must be necessary or
requisite to enable the FCU to effectively carry on its business. See
12 CFR 721.2. Furthermore, FCU directors have a fiduciary duty to
direct management to operate within sound business practices and the
best interests of the membership under Sec. 701.4. In addition,
article XVI, section 4 of the FCU Bylaws prohibits FCU directors,
committee members, officers, agents, and employees from conflicts of
interest
[[Page 31983]]
that could arise in the context of making charitable donations.
Two credit union trade associations, four leagues, and three credit
unions supported the elimination of the charitable contributions rule.
Three of these commenters maintained that the limitations on an FCU's
incidental powers, the board's fiduciary duties, and the FCU Bylaws
already set the appropriate standards for charitable contributions. One
commenter stated that the change would eliminate a bureaucratic hurdle
and enable FCUs to further their mission of helping people of modest
means. The bank trade association stated that the charitable
contributions rule protects the interests of members and avoids
conflicts of interest and, therefore, requested that NCUA retain it.
The Board believes the Act, FCU bylaws, part 721, and Sec. 701.4
provide sufficient constraints on an FCU's ability to make charitable
contributions. Accordingly, the final rule removes Sec. 701.25 as
proposed.
One credit union commenter expressed concern that FCUs would need
to seek approval to make donations because NCUA did not propose to
amend Sec. 721.3 to expressly identify charitable contributions as a
preapproved incidental power. Since 1979, NCUA has recognized that FCUs
may make charitable contributions under the provision in the Act that
authorizes an FCU ``to exercise such incidental powers as shall be
necessary or requisite to enable it to carry on effectively the
business for which it is incorporated.'' 44 FR 56691 (Oct. 2, 1979); 64
FR 19441 (Apr. 21, 1999); 12 U.S.C. 1757(17). The Board appreciates the
suggestion to clarify an FCU's authority to make charitable
contributions and donations in the incidental powers rule. The final
rule amends Sec. 721.3 accordingly by adding a new paragraph, derived
from NCUA legal opinions, identifying this authority.
b. Nonmember Deposits
The Act permits an FCU to receive shares from nonmember public
units, political subdivisions, and credit unions, subject to the limits
in the nonmember deposits rule, Sec. 701.32. 12 U.S.C. 1757(6); 12 CFR
701.32. Under paragraph (b) of Sec. 701.32, the maximum amount of all
public unit and nonmember shares that an FCU may hold cannot exceed the
greater of 20% of the FCU's total shares or $1.5 million. Under
paragraph (c) of Sec. 701.32, nonmember share deposits that an FCU has
accepted to meet a matching requirement for a Community Development
Revolving Loan Fund loan count against the nonmember deposit limit once
the FCU has repaid the loan. An FCU may request an exemption from its
regional director to exceed the limit. If the regional director denies
the request for an exemption, the FCU may appeal the decision to the
Board. The RegFlex rule exempted RegFlex FCUs from both paragraphs (b)
and (c) of Sec. 701.32, so RegFlex FCUs have not been subject to the
limit on the amount of public unit and nonmember shares.
The NPRM raised the dollar threshold on the nonmember deposit limit
in Sec. 701.32(b) to $3 million. The Board acknowledged that, by
eliminating RegFlex, RegFlex FCUs would lose their blanket exemption
from the nonmember deposit cap. Based on the amount of nonmember
deposits held by RegFlex FCUs, however, the Board stated that the
proposal provided all of the necessary flexibility and regulatory
relief to all FCUs without adversely affecting any of the RegFlex FCUs
that have accepted nonmember deposits in excess of the cap.
Both credit union trade associations and two leagues objected to
the elimination of the RegFlex blanket exemption from the nonmember
deposit rule's cap because all FCUs would now need a waiver to exceed
the cap. One commenter stated that most FCUs find the waiver process,
in general, to be unduly burdensome, time consuming, and, on occasion,
arbitrary. One commenter characterized the removal of the exemption as
an unfair and inflexible approach, and another stated that the change
does not represent an easing of regulatory compliance burden. Three of
these commenters generally supported raising the dollar threshold, but
one of the trade associations stated it was unclear why NCUA chose the
new level to be $3 million. The league commenters agreed with the $3
million threshold, suggested a higher threshold, or advocated
preservation of the exemption for RegFlex institutions. One commenter
suggested that NCUA eliminate the cap or, at a minimum, increase it to
$5 million.
Two league commenters and one credit union supported the change to
the nonmember deposit dollar threshold. One commenter stated that,
although the rule would eliminate the current exemption, the proposal
provided the appropriate amount of flexibility and regulatory relief to
FCUs without adversely impacting RegFlex FCUs. Another commenter noted
that smaller asset-sized FCUs can enjoy the opportunity to acquire an
increased volume of nonmember deposits.
The bank trade association supported the proposed rule's
requirement that all FCUs be subject to nonmember share limits. It
objected, however, to the proposed increase of the dollar threshold
from $1.5 million to $3 million, citing asset liability management and
liquidity concerns that could be created for some small FCUs with such
an increase. The commenter stated that small FCUs may not have the
necessary plans, practices, and experience to manage such an inflow of
deposits. It, therefore, recommended the rule require small FCUs taking
advantage of the higher threshold of $3 million to adopt policies
managing the risk associated with nonmember deposits. The commenter
further stated that because NCUA's Prompt Corrective Action rule, Sec.
702.202, specifies that the prohibition on accepting nonmember deposits
is a discretionary supervisory action for NCUA, undercapitalized credit
unions should be prohibited from accepting or rolling over nonmember
deposits.
As the Board stated in the NPRM, nonmember shares are
characteristically more volatile than core member shares. This
additional volatility can pose asset liability management concerns and
liquidity concerns. The Board determined it was appropriate to raise
the dollar threshold to $3 million because the agency's data reveals
that only four RegFlex FCUs currently exceed the limitation in Sec.
701.32(b) of the greater of 20% of total shares or $1.5 million in
nonmember deposits, and each of those FCUs holds less than $3 million.
To raise the maximum dollar threshold to $5 million would create a
wider gap for FCUs with lower total shares from the percentage of 20%
of total shares threshold without any need for such an increase. For
instance, an FCU with $7.5 million in total shares has been subject to
the $1.5 million and 20% percent caps of Sec. 701.32. Under this final
rule, however, the FCU will be permitted to accept up to $3 million in
nonmember deposits, representing 40% of total shares. To permit this
FCU to accept up to $5 million in shares would permit the FCU to accept
nonmember deposits amounting to two-thirds or over 66% of its total
shares. As such, the final rule maintains the proposed adjustment to
the dollar threshold in paragraph (b)(1) because it maintains the
regulatory relief that RegFlex FCUs have enjoyed. Furthermore, the
adjustment extends relief to FCUs, particularly those FCUs that have
lower amounts of total shares, and remains attentive to safety and
soundness considerations. The Board also finds it unnecessary to
include a blanket prohibition for undercapitalized FCUs
[[Page 31984]]
to accept nonmember deposits in Sec. 701.32 as suggested by one
commenter. The Prompt Corrective Action rule, Sec. 702.202(b)(6),
offers NCUA the appropriate flexibility in determining whether limiting
or prohibiting an undercapitalized FCU from accepting nonmember
deposits is the appropriate supervisory action under particular facts.
c. Fixed Assets
The Act authorizes an FCU to purchase, hold, and dispose of
property necessary or incidental to its operations. 12 U.S.C. 1757(4).
Generally, the fixed assets rule provides limits on fixed asset
investments, establishes occupancy and other requirements for acquired
and abandoned premises, and prohibits certain transactions. 12 CFR
701.36. ``Fixed assets'' is defined in Sec. 701.36(e) and includes
premises. ``Premises'' means any office, branch office, suboffice,
service center, parking lot, facility, or real estate where a credit
union transacts or will transact business.
When an FCU acquires premises for future expansion and does not
fully occupy the space within one year, the rule requires the FCU's
board of directors to have a resolution in place by the end of that
year with plans for full occupation. 12 CFR 701.36(b)(1). Additionally,
the FCU must partially occupy the premises within three years, unless
the FCU obtains a waiver within 30 months of acquiring the premises. 12
CFR 701.36(b)(1)-(2). RegFlex FCUs have enjoyed more flexibility by
having authority to take up to six years to partially occupy unimproved
land they acquired for future expansion. 12 CFR 701.36(d), 742.4(a)(3).
In the NPRM, the Board proposed to amend the fixed assets rule to
extend the three-year time period to six years for any FCU that
acquires unimproved land.
One credit union trade association, five leagues, and two credit
unions supported the proposed extension of time from three years to six
years. One league noted that, while most FCUs will probably not use the
expanded time frame, the flexibility will assist them in implementing
building plans efficiently. Another league stated that the change
provides relief to FCUs that acquired land during better economic times
or rates. It noted that, under the proposed extension, FCUs will not be
forced to choose between seeking a waiver or selling land because they
could not meet the three-year timeline.
As noted in the NPRM's preamble and discussed in previous
rulemakings, the Board recognizes that many real estate transactions
are complex and time consuming, and they involve a full array of issues
that an FCU must address before it is ready to occupy the premises.
This is especially true in the unimproved land context with its
construction-related issues. The final rule adopts the change to the
fixed assets rule as proposed by permitting any FCU a longer time (up
to six years, rather than only three years) to partially occupy the
premises if it initially acquired the property as unimproved land.
d. Investment Authorities
Some of the commenters provided general comments applicable to most
or all facets of the NPRM's proposed changes to the investment rule.
One credit union generally supported the ability of all FCUs to invest
in zero-coupon investments and CMRS, as well as to engage in borrowing
repurchase transactions. Two leagues stated that, while their members
were generally supportive of giving FCUs expanded investment
authorities, these relatively sophisticated financial instruments
require a baseline of expertise. The commenters stated that the rule
should include requirements for staff to have demonstrated expertise to
handle these transactions. One league argued that the proposal's well
capitalized standard merely eliminates the RegFlex designation while
preserving the same restrictions on eligibility. As such, the commenter
urged NCUA to consider whether the current restrictions on some types
of investments should be removed for more FCUs to allow flexibility in
diversifying investments and to reduce reliance on the ``currently
limited'' investments allowed under NCUA's rules. The Board maintains
the standards and conditions for the various investment authorities set
forth the proposed rule as discussed in the responses to specific
comments below.
1. Zero-coupon Investments
Under Sec. 703.16(b), an FCU may not purchase a zero-coupon
investment with a maturity date that is more than 10 years from the
related settlement date. RegFlex FCUs have been exempt from the maximum
maturity length of 10 years in the investment rule. 12 CFR 742.4(a)(4).
To balance the risk management concerns inherent in zero-coupon
investments with the flexibility previously granted to RegFlex FCUs,
the Board proposed to establish the maximum maturity date of zero-
coupon investments to 30 years for any FCU that meets the NPRM's well
capitalized standard. The Board proposed to grandfather zero-coupon
investments purchased in accordance with Sec. 742.4(a)(4) before the
effective date of the final rule, so FCUs that purchased zero-coupon
investments with maturities greater than 10 years under RegFlex
authority would not be required to divest those investments. The
proposed rule also provided that an FCU not meeting the well
capitalized standard may only purchase a zero-coupon investment with a
maturity date that is no more than 10 years from the related settlement
date, unless it received approval from its regional director to
purchase such an investment with a greater maturity.
Three commenters objected to the proposed rule change for zero-
coupon investments. One credit union trade association encouraged NCUA
to eliminate the 10-year maturity limit for zero-coupon investments.
One credit union stated the current rule is sufficient. Both of these
commenters stated that this issue is more appropriately addressed
within an FCU's investment policy. One league stated that it is more
appropriate to adopt a rule specific to interest rate risk rather than
remove the current flexibility afforded to certain RegFlex FCUs.
Two leagues supported the proposed changes regarding zero-coupon
investments. One commenter stated that it is reasonable to require an
FCU that does not meet the well capitalized standard to obtain approval
from its regional director to purchase a zero-coupon investment with a
maturity greater than ten years. The commenter also supported the
creation of a maximum maturity date of 30 years for well capitalized
FCUs. Another commenter suggested that the proposal include greater
flexibility by permitting well capitalized FCUs to pursue a waiver from
the 30-year maturity limit, as other FCUs would have the option to seek
waivers from their 10-year maturity cap.
As the Board noted in the NPRM's preamble, the percentage loss on
zero-coupon investments increases dramatically with maturity. These
losses could make FCUs reluctant to sell zero-coupon investments and
recognize losses during periods of liquidity stress. Therefore,
consistent with safety and soundness principles, the Board does not
believe it is appropriate to allow FCUs to purchase or hold zero-coupon
investments with maturity dates that exceed 30 years. Accordingly, the
Board adopts the final rule as proposed.
2. Borrowing Repurchase Transactions
A borrowing repurchase transaction is a transaction in which an FCU
agrees to sell a security to a counterparty and to
[[Page 31985]]
repurchase the same or an identical security from that counterparty at
a specified future date and at a specified price. 12 CFR 703.2. Subject
to additional restrictions, an FCU may enter into a borrowing
repurchase transaction as long as any investments the FCU purchases
with borrowed funds mature no later than the maturity of the borrowing
repurchase transaction. 12 CFR 703.13(d).
While the investment rule prohibits an FCU from purchasing a
security with the proceeds from a borrowing repurchase agreement if the
purchased security matures after the maturity of the borrowing
repurchase agreement, NCUA adopted a limited exemption for RegFlex FCUs
from the maturity restriction. 12 CFR 703.13(d)(3); 68 FR 32958, 32959
(June 3, 2003). A RegFlex FCU has been permitted to purchase securities
with maturities exceeding the maturity of the borrowing repurchase
transaction, commonly referred to as having mismatched maturities,
provided the amount of any such purchased securities does not exceed
the FCU's net worth. 12 CFR 742.4(a)(5).
In the NPRM, the Board proposed to continue this flexibility of
mismatched maturities for borrowing repurchase transactions for FCUs
meeting the well capitalized standard. It also proposed to grandfather
borrowing repurchase transactions into which an FCU entered pursuant to
its RegFlex authority before the effective date of the final rule. The
Board also sought to extend relief from the maturity requirement to
FCUs not meeting the well capitalized standard. Under the proposed
rule, these FCUs could enter into borrowing repurchase transactions and
use the proceeds to purchase investments with maturities no more than
30 days later than the transaction's term, so long as the value of the
purchased investments would not exceed the related FCU's net worth. In
addition, under the NPRM, FCUs not meeting the well capitalized
standard would be allowed to request additional authority from their
regional directors to enter transactions whereby the maturity mismatch
would be greater than 30 days. Lastly, the Board sought comment on
whether the final rule should specify minimum experience requirements
for staff involved in the analysis and ongoing risk management of a
repurchase agreement book, especially in cases where maturities of
sources and uses are mismatched.
Two leagues and one credit union supported the revised standards on
maturity matching for borrowing repurchase transactions. One credit
union requested that the final rule permit FCUs that are well
capitalized under part 702 but that do not have a CAMEL rating of 1 or
2 to enter these transactions without a maturity mismatch limitation,
provided the assets pledged are guaranteed by a governmental agency or
government-sponsored enterprise. One credit union trade association did
not support any minimum experience requirements for staff involved in
the analysis and ongoing risk management of borrowing repurchase
transactions, arguing that FCUs should have the flexibility to hire
qualified personnel without comparing the applicant to a predetermined
set of NCUA criteria.
The final rule makes no substantive change to the proposed rule. It
does clarify, however, that when an FCU purchases investments that have
mismatched maturities under borrowing repurchase agreements, the
aggregate or total value of purchased investments made under these
conditions cannot exceed the FCU's net worth. Therefore, under the
final rule, an FCU may purchase investments with maturities exceeding
the maturity of the borrowing repurchase transaction if the aggregate
amount of all such purchased investments does not exceed its net worth.
The Board notes that the final rule does not create an exception for
purchased investments that are guaranteed by a government agency or
government-sponsored entity because the conditions on maturity
mismatches are intended to address interest rate risk, rather than
default risk. The suggested exception would not further the Board's
goal. In addition, the final rule does not include experience
requirements. The Board again reminds FCUs, however, that they should
position themselves, through in-house or contracted expertise, to
properly engage in the analysis and ongoing risk management of
borrowing repurchase transactions.
3. Commercial Mortgage Related Security (CMRS)
Pursuant to section 107(15)(B) of the Act, a RegFlex FCU had been
permitted to purchase CMRS that are not otherwise permitted by section
107(7)(E) of the Act if: (i) the security is rated in one of the two
highest rating categories by at least one nationally-recognized
statistical rating organization (NRSRO); (ii) the security meets the
definition of mortgage related security as defined in 15 U.S.C.
78c(a)(41) and the definition of CMRS in Sec. 703.2; (iii) the pool of
loans underlying the CMRS contains more than 50 loans with no one loan
representing more than 10 percent of the pool; and (iv) the FCU does
not purchase an aggregate amount of CMRS in excess of 50 percent of its
net worth. 12 CFR 742.4(a)(6). In the NPRM, the Board proposed to
permit FCUs meeting the well capitalized standard to purchase private
label CMRS under these same conditions.
The Board also proposed to permit an FCU not meeting the well
capitalized standard to purchase private label CMRS under the
conditions applicable to well capitalized FCUs, but it limited the
aggregate amount of CMRS to 25 percent of the FCU's net worth. The NPRM
permitted such an FCU to seek authorization from its regional director
to purchase a greater amount of CMRS, up to 50 percent of its net
worth, if it could demonstrate three consecutive years of effective
CMRS portfolio management and the ability to evaluate key risk factors.
The proposed rule also added a grandfather provision for private label
CMRS purchased by an FCU under its RegFlex authority before the
effective date of the final rule. In the NPRM, the Board sought comment
on whether the conditions for purchasing CMRS should be enhanced to
encourage diversity and mitigate risk.
One league and one credit union supported the changes for CMRS as
proposed. One credit union trade association advocated additional
authority for FCUs in this area and supported removal of limitations on
CMRS that are not required by the Act. One credit union stated its
particular concern with the proposal because it believes the failure of
the corporate credit union system was caused by significant
concentrations of private label mortgage related securities. The
commenter stated that the proposed rule lacks sufficient guidance
related to credit risk management. It suggested that, at a minimum, the
rule require: pre-purchase credit analysis, including analysis of
underlying collateral, geographic diversification, cash flows, and
credit structures, as well as identification and general avoidance of
subordinated tranches that represent elevated levels of credit risk in
favor of senior tranches; documentation and retention of credit
analyses for as long as an FCU holds the CMRS; and ongoing credit
monitoring to identify emerging negative trends and potential concerns.
While the Board does not incorporate these conditions in the final
rule, the Board strongly believes the commenter has identified best
practices to which FCUs should adhere if they are to purchase CMRS. The
Board adopts the provisions regarding CMRS in the final rule as
proposed.
[[Page 31986]]
e. Eligible Obligations
The eligible obligations rule permits an FCU to purchase loans from
any source, provided that two conditions are satisfied. 12 CFR 701.23.
First, the borrower is a member of that FCU. Second, the loan is either
of a type the FCU is empowered to grant or the FCU refinances the loan
within 60 days of its purchase so that it meets the empowered to grant
requirement. 12 CFR 701.23(b)(1)(i). The rule also permits an FCU to
purchase student loans and real estate-secured loans, from any source,
if the purchasing FCU grants these loans on an ongoing basis and is
purchasing either type of loan to facilitate the packaging of a pool of
such loans for sale or pledge in the secondary market. 12 CFR
701.23(b)(1)(iii)-(iv). An FCU may also purchase the obligations of a
liquidating credit union's individual members from the liquidating
credit union. 12 CFR 701.23(b)(ii). The eligible obligations rule
restricts the aggregate amount of loans that an FCU may purchase to
five percent of the purchasing FCU's unimpaired capital and surplus. 12
CFR 701.23(b)(3). It excludes certain types of loans from this limit,
including loans purchased to facilitate a sale or pledge in the
secondary market. 12 CFR 701.23(b)(3).
RegFlex FCUs have been permitted to buy loans from other federally
insured credit unions without regard to whether the loans are eligible
obligations of the purchasing FCU's members or the members of a
liquidating credit union. 12 CFR 742.4(b). Loans purchased from a
liquidating credit union, however, are subject to the cap of five
percent of unimpaired capital and surplus. 12 CFR 742.4(b)(4); 66 FR
15055, 15059 (Mar. 15, 2001). RegFlex FCUs also have been able to
purchase student loans and real estate-secured loans without the
requirement that loans be purchased to facilitate a secondary market
pool package. 12 CFR 742.4(b).
The NPRM retained the flexibility currently provided to RegFlex
FCUs for FCUs meeting the well capitalized standard. The proposed rule
also grandfathered all eligible obligations purchased by RegFlex FCUs
before the effective date of the final rule. The proposed rule
similarly amended paragraph (e) in Sec. 723.1 to address nonmember
business loans purchased under RegFlex authority or obligations
purchased under proposed Sec. 701.23(b)(2). The Board requested
specific comment on whether it should extend the flexibility from the
eligible obligations rule to all FCUs or establish an approval process
through regional directors for FCUs not meeting the well capitalized
standard.
One league supported the expansion in the eligible obligations
rule. One credit union trade association recommended, at a minimum, an
expansion of this authority to allow FCUs that are somewhat less than
well capitalized to take advantage of the flexibility afforded to FCUs
meeting the well capitalized standard. Likewise, one league and one
credit union commenter urged NCUA to extend the flexibility for
eligible obligations to all FCUs or provide a waiver process similar to
the process for other expanded authorities. One commenter stated that
eligible obligation purchases that are made after an FCU applies proper
due diligence do not pose a safety and soundness issue for that FCU or
the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund. The credit union
commenter also urged NCUA to expand the purchasing authority to all
FCUs so they can benefit from the stabilizing effects of purchasing
well-performing obligations from diverse portfolios of other federally
insured credit unions. The commenter further stated that an expansion
would enhance safety and soundness in two ways. First, a purchasing FCU
can increase earnings by deploying excess liquidity into higher
yielding, high quality assets when loan demand from its members may be
low. Second, a purchasing FCU can reduce concentration risk because
selling institutions have different fields of membership. The commenter
also made suggestions to clarify the proposed regulatory text in Sec.
701.23.
The final rule substantively adopts the provisions in the proposed
rule pertaining to eligible obligations with two changes. It includes a
provision that allows FCUs not meeting the well capitalized standard to
seek authority from their regional directors to purchase obligations
from other federally insured credit unions under the same conditions
applicable to FCUs that do meet the well capitalized standard. The
final rule also uses plain language rather than paragraph citations
within Sec. 701.23 for ease of reading.
III. Final Rule
a. RegFlex
The final rule removes part 742 from title 12 to eliminate RegFlex
as the Board proposed in the NPRM. The Board noted in the preamble to
the proposed rule that it would address the appeals process before
NCUA's Supervisory Review Committee for RegFlex designation
revocations. In a separate, contemporaneous rulemaking, the Board is
amending NCUA Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 11-1, 76 FR
23871 (Apr. 29, 2011), to remove RegFlex appeals from the purview of
the committee because RegFlex no longer exists as of the effective date
of this rule.
b. Charitable Contributions
The final rule removes the entire charitable contributions rule,
Sec. 701.25, from part 701. With the deletion of this section, an FCU
will no longer be restricted by regulation to make donations only to
certain recipients and will not be required to obtain prior approval
from its board of directors. An FCU's authority to make donations will
continue to be governed by its incidental powers authority under the
Act, the fiduciary duties of its board, and its bylaws. NCUA has long
recognized an FCU's authority to make charitable contributions and
donations because an FCU may ``exercise such incidental powers as shall
be necessary or requisite to enable it to carry on effectively the
business for which it is incorporated.'' 44 FR 56691 (Oct. 2, 1979); 64
FR 19441 (Apr. 21, 1999); 12 U.S.C. 1757(17). Contributions, therefore,
must be necessary or requisite to enable the FCU to effectively carry
on its business. 12 CFR 721.2. Furthermore, FCU directors have a
fiduciary duty to direct management to operate within sound business
practices and the best interests of the membership under Sec. 701.4.
In addition, article XVI, section 4 of the FCU Bylaws prohibits FCU
directors, committee members, officers, agents, and employees from
conflicts of interest that could arise in the context of making
charitable donations.
As noted, the making of charitable contributions has long been
recognized by NCUA as an approved incidental power. The final rule,
therefore, amends Sec. 721.3 by adding a new paragraph (b) to identify
this authority and renumbers the remaining activities in the section.
c. Nonmember Deposits
The final rule raises the dollar threshold on the nonmember deposit
limit in Sec. 701.32(b) from $1.5 million to $3 million. The maximum
amount of all public unit and nonmember shares that any FCU may hold
cannot exceed the greater of 20 percent of the FCU's total shares or $3
million. Unlike the former RegFlex rule, the final rule does not
provide a standardized exemption from the nonmember deposit cap.
Section 701.32, however, continues to permit an FCU to request from its
regional director an exemption to exceed the limit on the maximum
amount of nonmember deposits. 12 CFR 701.32(b)(3)-(5). If the regional
director denies the request for
[[Page 31987]]
an exemption, the FCU may appeal the decision to the Board. 12 CFR
701.32(b)(5).
d. Fixed Assets
The final rule amends Sec. 701.36(b)(2) to permit any FCU a six-
year time frame to partially occupy the premises if the FCU acquired
unimproved land for its future expansion. As in the current rule,
premises are partially occupied when the FCU is using some part of the
space on a full-time basis. An FCU may request a waiver from the
partial occupation requirement. The amendment applies only to
unimproved real property and does not apply to any other kind of
premises.
e. Zero-Coupon Investments
In order to balance the risk management concerns discussed in the
NPRM, the final rule restricts FCUs meeting the well capitalized
standard from purchasing any zero-coupon investment with a maturity
date greater than 30 years. It also provides that an FCU not meeting
the well capitalized standard may not purchase a zero-coupon investment
with a maturity date that is more than 10 years from the related
settlement date, unless it has received approval from its regional
director to purchase such an investment with a greater maturity. In
addition, the final rule grandfathers zero-coupon investments purchased
under RegFlex authority before the effective date of this rule.
FCUs considering the purchase of zero-coupon investments should be
familiar with the dramatic rise in percentage loss on these investments
with maturity. Only FCUs with the appropriate level of expertise
positioned to measure the safety and soundness of purchasing zero-
coupon investments with extended maturities should consider such
investments.
f. Borrowing Repurchase Transactions
Section 703.13(d)(3)(iii) of the final rule permits FCUs meeting
the well capitalized standard to purchase investments with maturities
exceeding the maturity of the borrowing repurchase transaction. Section
703.13(d)(3)(ii) permits FCUs not meeting the well capitalized standard
to enter into borrowing repurchase transactions and use the proceeds to
purchase investments with maturities no more than 30 days later than
the transaction's term. Under Sec. 703.20, these FCUs may request
additional authority from their regional directors to enter
transactions whereby the maturity mismatch would be greater than 30
days. The final rule also clarifies that the total value of investments
that any FCU purchases through transactions with mismatched maturities
cannot exceed its net worth. In addition, the final rule contains a
grandfather provision for borrowing repurchase transactions into which
an FCU entered under its RegFlex authority before the effective date of
this rule.
The final rule, therefore, sets out three possible scenarios for
borrowing repurchase transactions under Sec. 703.13(d)(3). In the
first instance, the borrowing and corresponding investment transactions
must have matched maturities. In the second instance, the matched
maturity requirement would not apply if an FCU buys investments that
mature no more than 30 days after the maturity of the borrowing
repurchase transaction and the aggregate or total value of those
investments does not exceed 100 percent of the FCU's net worth. In the
third instance, an FCU that meets the well capitalized standard may
enter borrowing repurchase transactions with mismatched maturities
greater than 30 days if the total value of investments purchased
through transactions with mismatched maturities does not exceed 100
percent of the FCU's net worth.
g. CMRS
The final rule removes the prohibition in Sec. 703.16 on the
purchase of private label CMRS. The final rule permits an FCU that
meets the well capitalized standard to purchase CMRS that are not
otherwise permitted by section 107(7)(E) of the Act if: (i) the
security is rated in one of the two highest rating categories by at
least one NRSRO; \1\ (ii) the security meets the definition of mortgage
related security as defined in 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(41) and the definition
of CMRS in Sec. 703.2; (iii) the pool of loans underlying the CMRS
contains more than 50 loans with no one loan representing more than 10
percent of the pool; and (iv) the FCU does not purchase an aggregate
amount of CMRS in excess of 50 percent of its net worth. The final rule
provides that an FCU that does not meet the well capitalized standard
may purchase private label CMRS under conditions (i) through (iii)
above, but limits the aggregate amount of private label CMRS to 25
percent of its net worth. Section 703.20 establishes an approval
process so that such an FCU may seek authorization from its regional
director to purchase a greater amount of CMRS, up to a maximum of 50%
of its net worth. As part of its request for approval, an FCU must
demonstrate three consecutive years of effective CMRS portfolio
management and the ability to evaluate key risk factors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As required by Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), the Board issued a
proposal on March 1, 2011 to change this prong in part 742 with the
following language: ``The issuer has at least a very strong capacity
to meet its financial obligations, even under adverse economic
conditions, for the projected life of the security.'' 76 FR 11164
(Mar. 1, 2011). When NCUA adopts a final rule for the proposed
rulemaking issued in March 2011, the standard will change
accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the final rule adds a grandfather provision to Sec.
703.18 for private label CMRS purchased by an FCU under its RegFlex
authority before the effective date of this rule. As such, an FCU that
does not meet the well capitalized standard, but which holds private
label CMRS in excess of 25% of its net worth on the effective date of
this rule, is not required to divest those holdings on its books. The
FCU, however, cannot make additional purchases of CMRS while its
aggregate CMRS holdings exceed 25% of its net worth, without the
approval from the appropriate regional director under Sec. 703.20.
The Board notes again that the authority to purchase private label
CMRS, as with all of the flexibilities in the final rule, is not
appropriate for every FCU. Selection of CMRS consistent with safety and
soundness requires careful analysis of the underlying commercial
mortgages and corresponding collateral, as well as analysis of the cash
flow, credit structure, and market performance of the security.
As with all investments, FCUs must understand and be capable of
managing the risks associated with CMRS before purchasing them. The
investment rule's Sec. 703.3 requires an FCU's board of directors to
develop investment policies that address credit, liquidity, interest
rate, and concentration risks. 12 CFR 703.3. The policy must also
identify the characteristics of any investments that are suitable for
the FCU. FCUs that purchase CMRS must develop sound risk management
policies and construct limits that represent the FCU board's risk
tolerance. If necessary, NCUA may require an FCU to divest its
investments or assets for substantive safety and soundness reasons, on
a case-by-case basis.
h. Eligible Obligations
The final rule renumbers Sec. 701.23 and, under paragraph (b)(2),
permits FCUs that meet the well capitalized standard to buy loans from
other federally insured credit unions without regard to whether the
loans are eligible obligations of the purchasing FCU's members or the
members of a liquidating credit union. The final rule
[[Page 31988]]
subjects loans purchased from a liquidating credit union to the
eligible obligations cap of five percent of unimpaired capital and
surplus. FCUs meeting the well capitalized standard may also purchase
student loans and real estate-secured loans without the requirement
that the loans be purchased to facilitate a secondary market pool
package. The final rule also grandfathers all obligations purchased
under RegFlex authority before the effective date of this rule and
makes a similar amendment to paragraph (e) in Sec. 723.1 to address
nonmember business loans purchased under RegFlex authority or
obligations under Sec. 701.23(b)(2).
In addition, the final rule permits FCUs that do not meet the well
capitalized standard to request authority from their regional directors
to engage in this activity through a written request similar to the
process created in paragraph (b) of Sec. 703.20.
IV. The Interim Final Rule and Request for Comment
In issuing the proposed rule, NCUA inadvertently omitted changes to
RegFlex references in its rule setting the permissible deductible for
fidelity bond coverage. 12 CFR 713.6. That rule establishes a formula
for calculating the maximum allowable deductible based on asset size
with a cap of $200,000, but permits RegFlex FCUs a higher maximum
deductible of up to $1 million. 12 CFR 713.6(a)(1), (c). With the
elimination of RegFlex, the Board is issuing an interim final rule to
amend the fidelity bond rule so that it is consistent with the other
subject-specific rules discussed in this preamble. The interim final
rule changes the applicable benchmark for increased deductible limits
in Sec. 713.6 from RegFlex FCUs to FCUs meeting the same well
capitalized standard used in the other rules impacted by the
elimination of RegFlex.
The amendments track those that the Board makes in the final rule,
as well as the Sec. 713.6 provisions the Board adopted in 2005 for
FCUs that automatically qualified for a RegFlex designation. 70 FR
61713 (Oct. 26, 2005)
The interim final rule permits a maximum deductible for fidelity
bond coverage of $1 million if the FCU has: (1) Received a composite
CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' during its last two full examinations
and (2) maintained a ``well capitalized'' net worth classification for
the immediately preceding six quarters or has remained ``well
capitalized'' for the immediately preceding six quarters after applying
the applicable RBNW requirement.
Once a year, an FCU meeting the interim final rule's well
capitalized standard must review its continued eligibility for a higher
deductible under the rule, which is the same approach applied by the
Board when it adopted the fidelity bond RegFlex provisions in 2005. Id.
at 61714. An FCU's continued eligibility will be based on its asset
size as reflected in its most recent year-end 5300 call report and its
net worth as reflected in that same report. If an FCU that previously
qualified for the higher deductible has a decrease in assets based on
its most recent year-end 5300 call report or its net worth has
decreased so that it would no longer qualify under the well capitalized
standard in the rule, then it must obtain the coverage otherwise
required by Sec. 713.6. Likewise, if an FCU meets the assets threshold
and its net worth would otherwise continue to qualify it for the well
capitalized standard, but it failed to receive either a CAMEL rating of
1 or 2 during its most recent examination report, it must obtain the
required coverage with a deductible of no more than $200,000.
The Board is adopting this rulemaking as an interim final rule
because it meets the good cause exception to the procedures under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3). Notice and
public procedures are impracticable and contrary to the public interest
in this matter because the final rule eliminates RegFlex. To maintain
cross-references to RegFlex in the fidelity bond coverage rule would
cause confusion in implementation by FCUs, as well as undue and
untimely execution of NCUA's functions in monitoring compliance with
Sec. 713.6. The interim final rule complements the final rule, and it
is appropriate for the Board to synchronize its adoption of all of the
rule changes made in this document. The Board finds these reasons are
good cause to dispense with the APA's notice and comment period and the
procedures in NCUA's Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 87-2. 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B); 52 FR 35213 (Sept. 18, 1987), as amended by 68 FR
31949 (May 29, 2003). The interim final rule has an effective date 30
days after publication in the Federal Register, which coincides with
the final rule's effective date. Although the rule is being issued as
an interim final rule, the Board encourages interested parties to
submit comments within 60 days so the Board can consider any amendments
to the rule.
V. Rule Summary Table
In a further effort to comply with the Plain Writing Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111-274), the Board includes the following table to assist
readers by distinguishing the authorities for FCUs that meet the well
capitalized standard and FCUs that do not. We are providing this table
for your reference only. Please refer to regulatory text, as well as
the preambles for the NPRM and the final rule, for specific
information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FCUs not meeting
Final rule authority FCUs meeting well well capitalized
capitalized standard standard
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charitable Contributions.... Well capitalized This flexibility
FCUs may make applies to all
donations FCUs.
consistent with
their incidental
powers authority
and board's
fiduciary duties.
Nonmember Deposits.......... May accept up to the This flexibility
greater of 20% applies to all
total shares or $3 FCUs.
million. May
request exemption
from regional
director for
greater amount.
Unimproved Property for May take up to six This flexibility
Future Expansion. years to partially applies to all
occupy unimproved FCUs.
real property
purchased for
future expansion.
Zero-coupon Investments*.... May purchase zero- May purchase zero-
coupon investments coupon investments
with maturity dates with maturity dates
up to 30 years. up to 10 years. May
request authority
from regional
director for
maturities up to 30
years.
[[Page 31989]]
Borrowing Repurchase May enter into May enter into
Transaction*. Borrowing Borrowing
Repurchase Repurchase
Transactions where Transactions where
the underlying the underlying
investments mature investments mature
later than the no later than 30
borrowing, provided days after the
the total amount of borrowing, provided
investments the total amount of
purchased do not investments
exceed 100 percent purchased do not
of net worth. exceed 100 percent
of net worth. May
request authority
from regional
director for longer
maturity mismatch.
Private Label Commercial Not restricted to Similar
Mortgage Related Security purchasing only flexibilities apply
(CMRS)*. CMRS issued by to all FCUs, under
Fannie Mae or the following
Freddie Mac. May conditions:
purchase Private Requirements (i)-
Label CMRS if: (iii) would be the
(i) the security is same as for Well
rated in one of the Capitalized FCUs.
two highest rating The limit in
categories by at requirement (iv) is
least one NRSRO;. 25 percent of net
(ii) it is a worth. May request
``mortgage related approval from the
security'' under regional director
the Securities for higher limit,
Exchange Act of up to 50 percent of
1934 and Sec. net worth, if FCU
703.2;. has 3 consecutive
years of effective
CMRS portfolio
management and the
ability to evaluate
key risk factors.
(iii) the pool of
loans underlying
the CMRS contains
more than 50 loans
with no one loan
representing more
than 10 percent of
the pool; and
(iv) the FCU does
not purchase an
aggregate amount in
excess of 50
percent of net
worth.
Purchase of Eligible In addition to the These flexibilities
Obligations *. authority in the may be extended if
current Sec. approved by
701.23, may buy regional director,
loans from other otherwise limited
federally insured to the other
credit unions provisions of Sec.
without regard to 701.23 for
whether the loans purchasing eligible
are obligations of obligations
the purchasing (subject to
FCU's members. May membership or
also purchase pooling
nonmember student requirements)
loans and real
estate loans
without the need
for purchase to
facilitate a
secondary market
pool package. Also
may purchase loans
from a liquidating
credit union
regardless of
whether the loans
were made to
liquidating CU's
members, subject to
the aggregate cap
on eligible
obligations of 5
percent of
unimpaired capital
and surplus.
Fidelity Bond Coverage-- $2,000 plus 1/1000 $2,000 plus 1/1000
Maximum Deductible for FCUs of total assets up of total assets up
with Over $1 million in to a maximum of to a maximum of
Assets. $1,000,000. $200,000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* All authorized activity entered into before the effective date of the
final rule is grandfathered.
VI. Regulatory Procedures
a. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
to describe any significant economic impact a rule may have on a
substantial number of small entities (primarily those under ten million
dollars in assets). This rule reduces compliance burden and extends
regulatory relief while maintaining existing safety and soundness
standards. NCUA has determined and certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
credit unions.
b. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) applies to rulemakings in
which an agency by rule creates a new paperwork burden on regulated
entities or modifies an existing burden. 44 U.S.C. 3507(d); 5 CFR part
1320. For purposes of the PRA, a paperwork burden may take the form of
either a reporting or a recordkeeping requirement, both referred to as
information collections. As required, NCUA has applied to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for approval of the information collection
requirement described below.
The final rule contains an information collection in the form of a
voluntary written request for additional authorities from a regional
director under proposed Sec. 703.20 and Sec. 701.23(h). An FCU that
does not meet the well capitalized standard may submit a written
request to its regional director to request expanded authority above
any or all of the following provisions in the rule: (1) The borrowing
repurchase transaction maximum maturity mismatch of 30 days under
proposed Sec. 703.13(d)(3)(ii), (2) the zero-coupon investment 10-year
maximum maturity under proposed Sec. 703.14(i), up to a maturity of no
more than 30 years, (3) the aggregate commercial mortgage related
security limit of 25% of net worth under proposed Sec. 703.14(j), up
to no more than 50% of net worth, and (4) the membership and pooling
limitations in Sec. 701.23(b)(1) when purchasing loans under Sec.
701.23(b)(2). An FCU meets the well capitalized standard if the FCU has
received a composite CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' during its last two
full examinations and (1) has maintained a ``well capitalized'' net
worth classification for the immediately preceding six quarters, or (2)
has remained ``well capitalized'' for the immediately preceding six
quarters after applying the applicable RBNW requirement. In the
proposed rule, the Board estimated 1,770 FCUs may apply for an
additional authority. The cumulative total annual paperwork burden is
estimated to be approximately 1,770 hours.
[[Page 31990]]
OMB is currently reviewing NCUA's submission and NCUA will publish
the OMB number assigned to this rulemaking once issued.
c. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests.
NCUA, an independent regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive order to adhere to fundamental
federalism principles. This final rule will not have a substantial
direct effect on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
d. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Pub. L. 104-121) provides generally for congressional review of agency
rules. A reporting requirement is triggered in instances where NCUA
issues a final rule as defined by Section 551 of the Administrative
Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of Management and Budget has
determined that this rule is not a major rule for purposes of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
e. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this final IRPS will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112
Stat. 2681 (1998).
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions.
12 CFR Part 703
Credit unions, Investments.
12 CFR Part 713
Credit unions, Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 721
Credit unions.
12 CFR Part 723
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 742
Credit unions, reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on May 24,
2012.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons discussed above, NCUA amends 12 CFR parts 701, 703,
713, 721, 723, and 742 as follows:
PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 701 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756, 1757, 1759, 1761a,
1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782, 1784, 1787, and 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31 is also authorized by
15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 1861 and 42 U.S.C. 3601-3610.
Section 701.35 is also authorized by 42 U.S.C. 4311-4312.
0
2. In Sec. 701.23:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) as paragraphs (b)(3) and (4);
0
b. Add new paragraph (b)(2):
0
c. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(4) introductory text, remove the
phrase ``under paragraph (b) of this section'' and add in its place
``under paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section'';
0
d. Add paragraph (b)(5);
0
e. Add paragraph (h).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 701.23 Purchase, sale, and pledge of eligible obligations.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Purchase of obligations from a FICU. A federal credit union
that received a composite CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' for the last
two (2) full examinations and maintained a net worth classification of
``well capitalized'' under Part 702 of this chapter for the six (6)
immediately preceding quarters or, if subject to a risk-based net worth
(RBNW) requirement under Part 702 of this chapter, has remained ``well
capitalized'' for the six (6) immediately preceding quarters after
applying the applicable RBNW requirement may purchase and hold the
following obligations, provided that it would be empowered to grant
them:
(i) Eligible obligations. Eligible obligations without regard to
whether they are obligations of its members, provided they are
purchased from a federally-insured credit union and the obligations are
either:
(A) Loans the purchasing credit union is empowered to grant; or
(B) Loans refinanced with the consent of the borrowers, within 60
days after they are purchased, so that they are loans the purchasing
credit union is empowered to grant;
(ii) Eligible obligations of a liquidating credit union. Eligible
obligations of a liquidating credit union without regard to whether
they are obligations of the liquidating credit union's members.
(iii) Student loans. Student loans provided they are purchased from
a federally-insured credit union only;
(iv) Real estate-secured loans. Real estate-secured loans provided
they are purchased from a federally-insured credit union only;
* * * * *
(5) Grandfathered purchases. Subject to safety and soundness
considerations, a federal credit union may hold any of the loans
described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section provided it was
authorized to purchase the loan and purchased the loan before July 2,
2012.
* * * * *
(h) Additional authority. (1) A federal credit union may submit a
written request to its regional director seeking expanded authority to
purchase loans described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if it is
not otherwise authorized by this section. The written request must
include the following:
(i) A copy of the credit union's purchase policy;
(ii) The types of eligible obligations under paragraph (b)(2) of
this section that the credit union seeks to purchase;
(iii) An explanation of the need for additional authority; and
(iv) An analysis of the credit union's prior experience with the
purchase of eligible obligations.
(2) Approval process. A regional director will provide a written
determination on a request for expanded authority within 60 calendar
days after receipt of the request; however, the 60-day period will not
begin until the requesting credit union has submitted all necessary
information to the regional director. The regional director will inform
the requesting credit union, in writing, of the date the request was
received and of any additional documentation that the regional director
requires in support of the request. If the regional director approves
the request, the regional director will establish a limit on loan
purchases as appropriate and subject to the limitations in this
section. If the regional director does not notify the credit union of
the action taken on its request within 60 calendar days of the receipt
of the request or the receipt of additional requested supporting
information, whichever
[[Page 31991]]
occurs later, the credit union may purchase loans it requested under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(3) Appeal to NCUA Board. A federal credit union may appeal any
part of the determination made under this paragraph to the NCUA Board
by submitting its appeal through the regional director within 30 days
of the date of the determination.
Sec. 701.25 [Removed and Reserved]
0
3. Remove and reserve Sec. 701.25.
Sec. 701.32 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 701.32 amend paragraph (b)(1) by removing ``$1.5 million''
after the words ``federal credit union'' and adding in its place ``$3
million''.
0
5. Amend Sec. 701.36 by revising paragraph (b)(2) and removing
paragraph (d) and redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (d):
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 701.36 FCU ownership of fixed assets.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) When a federal credit union acquires premises for future
expansion, it must partially occupy the premises within a reasonable
period, not to exceed three years, unless the credit union has acquired
unimproved real property for future expansion. If a federal credit
union has acquired unimproved real property to develop for future
expansion, it must partially occupy the premises within a reasonable
period, not to exceed six years. Premises are partially occupied when
the credit union is using some part of the space on a full-time basis.
The NCUA may waive this partial occupation requirement in writing upon
written request. The request must be made within 30 months after the
property is acquired.
* * * * *
PART 703--INVESTMENTS AND DEPOSIT ACTIVITIES
0
6. The authority citation for part 703 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757(7), 1757(8), 1757(15).
0
7. In Sec. 703.13, revise paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 703.13 Permissible investment activities.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) The investments referenced in paragraph (d)(2) of this section
must mature under the following conditions:
(i) No later than the maturity of the borrowing repurchase
transaction;
(ii) No later than thirty days after the borrowing repurchase
transaction, unless authorized under Sec. 703.20, provided the value
of all investments purchased with maturities later than borrowing
repurchase transactions does not exceed 100 percent of the federal
credit union's net worth; or
(iii) At any time later than the maturity of the borrowing
repurchase transaction, provided the value of all investments purchased
with maturities later than borrowing repurchase transactions does not
exceed 100 percent of the federal credit union's net worth and the
credit union received a composite CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' for
the last two (2) full examinations and maintained a net worth
classification of ``well capitalized'' under part 702 of this chapter
for the six (6) immediately preceding quarters or, if subject to a
risk-based net worth (RBNW) requirement under part 702 of this chapter,
has remained ``well capitalized'' for the six (6) immediately preceding
quarters after applying the applicable RBNW requirement.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 703.14 by adding paragraphs (i) and (j) to read as
follows:
Sec. 703.14 Permissible investments.
* * * * *
(i) Zero-coupon investments. A federal credit union may only
purchase a zero-coupon investment with a maturity date that is no
greater than 10 years from the related settlement date, unless
authorized under Sec. 703.20 or otherwise provided in this paragraph.
A federal credit union that received a composite CAMEL rating of ``1''
or ``2'' for the last two (2) full examinations and maintained a net
worth classification of ``well capitalized'' under part 702 of this
chapter for the six (6) immediately preceding quarters or, if subject
to a risk-based net worth (RBNW) requirement under part 702 of this
chapter, has remained ``well capitalized'' for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters after applying the applicable RBNW requirement, may
purchase a zero-coupon investment with a maturity date that is no
greater than 30 years from the related settlement date.
(j) Commercial mortgage related security (CMRS). A federal credit
union may purchase a CMRS permitted by Section 107(7)(E) of the Act;
and, pursuant to Section 107(15)(B) of the Act, a CMRS of an issuer
other than a government-sponsored enterprise enumerated in Section
107(7)(E) of the Act, provided:
(1) The CMRS is rated in one of the two highest rating categories
by at least one nationally-recognized statistical rating organization;
(2) The CMRS meets the definition of mortgage related security as
defined in 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(41) and the definition of commercial
mortgage related security as defined in Sec. 703.2 of this part;
(3) The CMRS's underlying pool of loans contains more than 50 loans
with no one loan representing more than 10 percent of the pool; and
(4) The aggregate amount of private label CMRS purchased by the
federal credit union does not exceed 25 percent of its net worth,
unless authorized under Sec. 703.20 or as otherwise provided in this
subparagraph. A federal credit union that has received a composite
CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' for the last two (2) full examinations
and maintained a net worth classification of ``well capitalized'' under
part 702 of this chapter for the six (6) immediately preceding quarters
or, if subject to a risk-based net worth (RBNW) requirement under part
702 of this chapter, has remained ``well capitalized'' for the six (6)
immediately preceding quarters after applying the applicable RBNW
requirement, may hold private label CMRS in an aggregate amount not to
exceed 50% of its net worth.
Sec. 703.16 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 703.16, remove paragraphs (b) and (d) and redesignate
paragraphs (c), (e), and (f) as paragraphs (b), (c), and (d)
respectively.
0
10. In Sec. 703.18, redesignate paragraph (b) as paragraph (c) and add
new paragraph (b) read as follows:
Sec. 703.18 Grandfathered investments.
* * * * *
(b) A federal credit union may hold a zero-coupon investment with a
maturity greater than 10 years, a borrowing repurchase transaction in
which the investment matures at any time later than the maturity of the
borrowing, or CMRS that cause the credit union's aggregate amount of
CMRS from issuers other than government-sponsored enterprises to exceed
25% of its net worth, in each case if it purchased the investment or
entered the transaction under the Regulatory Flexibility Program before
July 2, 2012.
0
11. Add Sec. 703.20 to read as follows:
Sec. 703.20 Request for additional authority.
(a) Additional authority. A federal credit union may submit a
written request to its regional director seeking expanded authority
above the following limits in this part:
[[Page 31992]]
(1) Borrowing repurchase transaction maximum maturity mismatch of
30 days under Sec. 703.13(d)(3)(ii).
(2) Zero-coupon investment 10-year maximum maturity under Sec.
703.14(i), up to a maturity of no more than 30 years.
(3) CMRS aggregate limit of 25% of net worth under Sec. 703.14(j),
up to no more than 50% of net worth. To obtain approval for additional
authority, the federal credit union must demonstrate three consecutive
years of effective CMRS portfolio management and the ability to
evaluate key risk factors.
(b) Written request. A federal credit union desiring additional
authority must submit a written request to the NCUA regional office
having jurisdiction over the geographical area in which the credit
union's main office is located, that includes the following:
(1) A copy of the credit union's investment policy;
(2) The higher limit sought;
(3) An explanation of the need for additional authority;
(4) Documentation supporting the credit union's ability to manage
the investment or activity; and
(5) An analysis of the credit union's prior experience with the
investment or activity.
(c) Approval process. A regional director will provide a written
determination on a request for expanded authority within 60 calendar
days after receipt of the request; however, the 60-day period will not
begin until the requesting credit union has submitted all necessary
information to the regional director. The regional director will inform
the requesting credit union, in writing, of the date the request was
received and of any additional documentation that the regional director
requires in support of the request. If the regional director approves
the request, the regional director will establish a limit on the
investment or activity as appropriate and subject to the limitations in
this part. If the regional director does not notify the credit union of
the action taken on its request within 60 calendar days of the receipt
of the request or the receipt of additional requested supporting
information, whichever occurs later, the credit union may proceed with
its proposed investment or investment activity.
(d) Appeal to NCUA Board. A federal credit union may appeal any
part of the determination made under paragraph (c) to the NCUA Board by
submitting its appeal through the regional director within 30 days of
the date of the determination.
PART 713--FIDELITY BONDS AND INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
0
12. The authority citation for part 713 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1761a, 1761b, 1766(a), 1766(h),
1789(a)(11).
0
13. In Sec. 713.6, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 713.6 What is the permissible deductible?
(a)(1) The maximum amount of allowable deductible is computed based
on a federal credit union's asset size and capital level, as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets Maximum deductible
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$0 to $100,000.............................. No deductible allowed.
$100,001 to $250,000........................ $1,000.
$250,000 to $1,000,000...................... $2,000.
Over $1,000,000............................. $2,000 plus 1/1000 of total assets up to a maximum of $200,000;
for credit unions that have received a composite CAMEL rating of
``1'' or ``2'' for the last two (2) full examinations and
maintained a net worth classification of ``well capitalized''
under part 702 of this chapter for the six (6) immediately
preceding quarters or, if subject to a risk-based net worth
(RBNW) requirement under part 702 of this chapter, has remained
``well capitalized'' for the six (6) immediately preceding
quarters after applying the applicable RBNW requirement, the
maximum deductible is $1,000,000.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(c) A federal credit union that has received a composite CAMEL
rating of ``1'' or ``2'' for the last two (2) full examinations and
maintained a net worth classification of ``well capitalized'' under
part 702 of this chapter for the six (6) immediately preceding quarters
or, if subject to a risk-based net worth (RBNW) requirement under part
702 of this chapter, has remained ``well capitalized'' for the six (6)
immediately preceding quarters after applying the applicable RBNW
requirement is eligible to qualify for a deductible in excess of
$200,000. The credit union's eligibility is determined based on it
having assets in excess of $1 million as reflected in its most recent
year-end 5300 call report. A federal credit union that previously
qualified for a deductible in excess of $200,000, but that subsequently
fails to qualify based on its most recent year-end 5300 call report
because either its assets have decreased or it no longer meets the net
worth requirements of this paragraph or fails to meet the CAMEL rating
requirements of this paragraph as determined by its most recent
examination report, must obtain the coverage otherwise required by
paragraph (b) of this section within 30 days of filing its year-end
call report and must notify the appropriate NCUA regional office in
writing of its changed status and confirm that it has obtained the
required coverage.
PART 721--INCIDENTAL POWERS
0
14. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757(17), 1766, 1789.
0
15. In Sec. 721.3, redesignate paragraphs (b) through (l) as
paragraphs (c) through (m) and add new paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 721.3 What categories of activities are preapproved incidental
powers necessary or requisite to carry on a credit union's business?
* * * * *
(b) Charitable contributions and donations. Charitable
contributions and donations are gifts you provide to assist others
through contributions of staff, equipment, money, or other resources.
Examples of charitable contributions include donations to community
groups, nonprofit organizations, other credit unions or credit union
affiliated causes, political donations, as well as donations to create
charitable foundations.
* * * * *
PART 723--MEMBER BUSINESS LOANS
0
16. The authority citation for part 723 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1756, 1757, 1757A, 1766, 1785, 1789.
[[Page 31993]]
0
17. In Sec. 723.1 revise paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 723.1 What is a member business loan?
* * * * *
(e) Purchases of nonmember loans and nonmember loan participations.
Any interest a credit union obtains in a nonmember loan, pursuant to
Sec. Sec. 701.22 and 701.23(b)(2), under a Regulatory Flexibility
Program designation before July 2, 2012 or other authority, is treated
the same as a member business loan for purposes of this rule and the
risk weighting standards under part 702 of this chapter, except that
the effect of such interest on a credit union's aggregate member
business loan limit will be as set forth in Sec. 723.16(b) of this
part.
PART 742--[REMOVED]
0
18. Under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1756 and 1766, the National Credit
Union Administration removes part 742.
[FR Doc. 2012-13212 Filed 5-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P