Safety Zone, Temporary Change for Recurring Fireworks Display Within the Fifth Coast Guard District, Pamlico River and Tar River; Washington, NC, 31183-31186 [2012-12727]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 102 / Friday, May 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
1992, and IA was tasked with making
short supply determinations under these
regulations. IA has determined to
withdraw these regulations because they
are obsolete, as the associated import
restraints have not affected U.S. trade
for over 19 years.
Classification
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no new
collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Executive Order 13132
This final rule does not contain
policies with federalism implications as
that term is defined in section 1(a) of
Executive Order 13132, dated August 4,
1999 (64 FR 43255) (August 10, 1999).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environmental Impact
ITA has determined pursuant to 21
CFR 25.30 that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) of 1996; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
whenever a Federal agency is required
to publish a notice of rulemaking for
any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare, and make available for public
comment, a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of the
rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and
small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of an
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide a statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The Department of Commerce
Chief Counsel for Regulation certified at
the proposed rule stage that this rule
will have no impact on small entities.
This rule simply makes a technical
correction by withdrawing obsolete
regulations. No comments were received
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 May 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
on that certification. Accordingly, no
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is
required and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 336
Imports, Quotas, Reporting and
recordkeeping, Tariffs, Textiles.
19 CFR Part 357
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Steel.
PART 336—IMPORTS OF COTTON
WOVEN FABRIC
Accordingly, under the authority
given pursuant to the Tax Relief and
Health Care Act of 2006, at Division C,
Title IV, Section 406(a)(1) (Pub. L. 109–
432) (2006) (titled ‘‘Temporary Duty
Reductions for Certain Cotton Shirting
Fabric’’ and listing 12/31/2009 as the
end date for the tariff rate quota), ITA
amends 15 CFR chapter III by removing
part 336.
■
PART 357—SHORT SUPPLY
PROCEDURES
Accordingly, under the authority
given by Section 4(b) of the Steel Trade
Liberalization Program Implementation
Act (Pub. L. 101–221), which by its
terms was limited to imports through
March 31, 1992, ITA amends 19 CFR
chapter III by removing part 357.
■
Dated: May 21, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–12791 Filed 5–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0097]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Temporary Change for
Recurring Fireworks Display Within the
Fifth Coast Guard District, Pamlico
River and Tar River; Washington, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
temporarily changing the enforcement
period and location of safety zone
regulations for a recurring fireworks
display within the Fifth Coast Guard
District. This regulation applies to two
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31183
recurring fireworks display events that
take place at Washington, NC. Safety
zone regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Pamlico River
and Tar River near Washington, NC,
during the event.
DATES: This rule will be effective from
June 8, 2012 until July 5, 2012 and
enforced on June 8, 2012 and July 4,
2012 from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2012–0097 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2012–0097 in the ‘‘Search’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Chief Warrant Officer
Joseph Edge, Prevention Department,
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina,
Atlantic Beach, NC; telephone 252–247–
4525, email Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On March 13, 2012, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone, Temporary Change
for Recurring Fireworks Display within
the Fifth Coast Guard District, Pamlico
River and Tar River; Washington, NC in
the Federal Register (77 FR 14703). We
received no comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Given the timing of the event,
it would be impracticable to allow 30
days after publication before enforcing
this safety zone.
Background and Purpose
Fireworks display events are
frequently held on or adjacent to
navigable waters within the boundary of
E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM
25MYR1
31184
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 102 / Friday, May 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
the Fifth Coast Guard District. For a
description of the geographical area of
each Coast Guard Sector—Captain of the
Port Zone, please see 33 CFR 3.25.
This regulation temporarily changes
the enforcement period and geographic
location for a safety zone for two
annually recurring fireworks events,
described at (d)(7) of the Table to 33
CFR 165.506, that are normally
scheduled to occur each year on the
second Saturday in June and on the first
Saturday after July 4th. This regulation
applies to only the fireworks events
listed in the Table to § 165.506, section
(d)7.
On June 8, 2012 and July 4, 2012, the
Town of Washington, NC will sponsor
their annual fireworks events. These
events will take place in Washington,
NC on the waters of the Pamlico River.
The regulation at 33 CFR 165.506 is
enforced annually for this event. Also,
a fleet of spectator vessels is expected to
gather near the event site to view the
fireworks. To provide for the safety of
participants, spectators, and transiting
vessels, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
event area from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
on June 8, 2012 and July 4, 2012. The
regulation at 33 CFR 165.506 will be
enforced for the duration of the event.
Vessels may not enter the regulated area
unless they receive permission from the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
The Table to § 165.506, event (d)(7)
establishes the enforcement date and
geographic location for the fireworks
events held in Washington, North
Carolina. This regulation temporarily
changes the enforcement location to
latitude 35°32′25″ N, longitude
077°03′42″ W. The temporary safety
zone will be enforced from 7:30 p.m. to
10:30 p.m. on June 8, 2012 and July 4,
2012, and will restrict general
navigation in the regulated area during
the event. Except for participants and
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, no person or vessel
will be allowed to enter or remain in the
regulated area. These regulations are
needed to control vessel traffic during
the event to enhance the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 May 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this regulation will restrict
access to the area, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because: (i) The
safety zone will only be in effect from
7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 08, 2012
and July 4, 2012; (ii) the Coast Guard
will give advance notification via
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly; (iii)
although the safety zone will apply to
the section of the Pamlico River and Tar
River, vessel traffic will be able to
transit safely around the safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the specified
portion of Pamlico River and Tar River
from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 8,
2012 and July 4, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule will
only be in effect for three hours each
day from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
Although the safety zone will apply to
a section of the Pamlico River, vessel
traffic will be able to transit safely
around the safety zone. Before the
effective period, the Coast Guard will
issue maritime advisories widely
available to the users of the waterway.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted for
inflation) in any one year. Though this
rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM
25MYR1
31185
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 102 / Friday, May 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Technical Standards
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. At § 165.506, in the Table to
§ 165.506, make the following
amendments:
■ a. Under ‘‘(d) Coast Guard Sector
North Carolina—COTP Zone,’’ suspend
entry 7, from June 7, 2012 through June
9, 2012, and from July 3, 2012 through
July 8, 2012.
■ b. Under ‘‘(d) Coast Guard Sector
North Carolina—COTP Zone,’’ add entry
14, which will be enforced from 7:30
p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 8, 2012 and
from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 4,
2012, to read as follows:
■
Environment
Energy Effects
protect the public from fireworks
fallout. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of this instruction. This rule
establishes a temporary safety zone to
§ 165.506–T05–0097 Safety Zones; Fifth
Coast Guard District Fireworks Displays.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE TO § 165.506
[All coordinates listed in the Table to § 165.506 reference Datum NAD 1983]
No.
Date
*
*
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
14 .........
Location
*
*
*
*
(d.) Coast Guard Sector North Carolina—COTP Zone
*
June 8, 2012, July 4, 2012 .......
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 May 24, 2012
Regulated area
Jkt 226001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Pamlico River and Tar River, All waters of Pamlico River and Tar River within a 300 yard raWashington, NC, Safety Zone.
dius of latitude 35°32′25″ N, longitude 077°03′42″ W, a position located on the southwest shore of the Pamlico River,
Washington, NC.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM
25MYR1
31186
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 102 / Friday, May 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
*
Dated: May 5, 2012.
Anthony Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2012–12727 Filed 5–24–12; 8:45 am]
Table of Acronyms
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
A. Regulatory Information
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0333]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; USS MISSISSIPPI
Commissioning; Pascagoula Harbor &
Pascagoula River; Pascagoula, MS
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
for the arrival, commissioning, and
departure of the USS MISSISSIPPI. This
security zone is necessary to protect
persons, vessels, and waterfront
facilities from destruction, loss, or
injury from sabotage or other subversive
acts, accidents, or other causes of a
similar nature during the arrival,
commissioning, and departure of the
USS MISSISSIPPI. Entry into this zone
is prohibited to all vessels, mariners,
and persons unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Mobile or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from May
23, 2012 to June 8, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0333. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LT Lenell J. Carson,
Sector Mobile, Waterways Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 251–441–5940,
email Lenell.J.Carson@uscg.mil. If you
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 May 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because there
is insufficient time to publish a NPRM.
Following a planning meeting on March
29, 2012 between the U.S Navy, U.S
Coast Guard, local agencies, and port
stakeholders, the Coast Guard
determined that a temporary security
zone is necessary during the arrival,
commissioning ceremony (to be held on
June 2, 2012), and departure of the USS
MISSISSIPPI. Publishing a NPRM and
delaying this rule’s effective date would
be impracticable because it would
unnecessarily delay the USS
MISSISSIPPI’s schedule and
commitments. Delaying or foregoing this
necessary security zone would also be
contrary to public interest. This is a
scheduled public event surrounding the
commissioning of a U.S. Naval vessel
and immediate action is necessary to
implement additional security measure
to protect persons, vessels, and
waterfront facilities from destruction,
loss, or injury from sabotage or other
subversive acts, accidents, or other
causes of a similar nature.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because immediate action is needed to
protect persons, vessels, and waterfront
facilities from destruction, loss, or
injury from sabotage or other subversive
acts, accidents, or other causes of a
similar nature during the arrival,
commissioning, and departure of the
USS MISSISSIPPI.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Basis and Purpose
The USS MISSISSIPPI will be
commissioned at the Port of Pascagoula,
Pascagoula, MS on June 2, 2012.
Scheduled events surround the
commissioning ceremony will draw
large crowds in or near the port.
Additional security measures are
necessary to protect persons, vessels,
and waterfront facilities from
destruction, loss, or injury from
sabotage or other subversive acts,
accidents, or other causes of a similar
nature during the arrival,
commissioning, and departure of the
USS MISSISSIPPI.
The COTP anticipates some impact on
vessel traffic due to this regulation.
However, this security zone is deemed
necessary for the protection of life and
property within the COTP Mobile zone.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary security zone for the arrival,
commissioning, and departure of the
USS MISSISSIPPI. While the USS
MISSISSIPPI is underway in the
Pascagoula Harbor shoreward of the
Horn Island Pass Lighted Buoy HI (RW
‘‘HI’’ Mo (A); Position 30–08–30.049 N,
088–38–40.125 W), the temporary
security zone includes all waters within
100 yards of the USS MISSISSIPPI.
When the USS MISSISSIPPI is moored
in the Port of Pascagoula, the temporary
security zone includes all waters within
25 yards of the USS MISSISSIPPI. Entry
into these zones is prohibited to all
vessels, mariners, and persons unless
specifically authorized by the COTP
Mobile or a designated representative.
The COTP may be contacted by
telephone at 251–441–5976.
The COTP Mobile or a designated
representative will inform the public
through broadcast notice to mariners of
changes in the effective period for the
security zone. This rule is effective from
May 23, 2012 to June 8, 2012.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM
25MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31183-31186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12727]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0097]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Temporary Change for Recurring Fireworks Display
Within the Fifth Coast Guard District, Pamlico River and Tar River;
Washington, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the enforcement period
and location of safety zone regulations for a recurring fireworks
display within the Fifth Coast Guard District. This regulation applies
to two recurring fireworks display events that take place at
Washington, NC. Safety zone regulations are necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the Pamlico River
and Tar River near Washington, NC, during the event.
DATES: This rule will be effective from June 8, 2012 until July 5, 2012
and enforced on June 8, 2012 and July 4, 2012 from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30
p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2012-0097 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2012-0097 in the ``Search''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Chief Warrant Officer Joseph Edge, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Atlantic Beach, NC;
telephone 252-247-4525, email Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On March 13, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone, Temporary Change for Recurring Fireworks
Display within the Fifth Coast Guard District, Pamlico River and Tar
River; Washington, NC in the Federal Register (77 FR 14703). We
received no comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Given the timing of the event, it
would be impracticable to allow 30 days after publication before
enforcing this safety zone.
Background and Purpose
Fireworks display events are frequently held on or adjacent to
navigable waters within the boundary of
[[Page 31184]]
the Fifth Coast Guard District. For a description of the geographical
area of each Coast Guard Sector--Captain of the Port Zone, please see
33 CFR 3.25.
This regulation temporarily changes the enforcement period and
geographic location for a safety zone for two annually recurring
fireworks events, described at (d)(7) of the Table to 33 CFR 165.506,
that are normally scheduled to occur each year on the second Saturday
in June and on the first Saturday after July 4th. This regulation
applies to only the fireworks events listed in the Table to Sec.
165.506, section (d)7.
On June 8, 2012 and July 4, 2012, the Town of Washington, NC will
sponsor their annual fireworks events. These events will take place in
Washington, NC on the waters of the Pamlico River. The regulation at 33
CFR 165.506 is enforced annually for this event. Also, a fleet of
spectator vessels is expected to gather near the event site to view the
fireworks. To provide for the safety of participants, spectators, and
transiting vessels, the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in the event area from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 8, 2012
and July 4, 2012. The regulation at 33 CFR 165.506 will be enforced for
the duration of the event. Vessels may not enter the regulated area
unless they receive permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
The Table to Sec. 165.506, event (d)(7) establishes the
enforcement date and geographic location for the fireworks events held
in Washington, North Carolina. This regulation temporarily changes the
enforcement location to latitude 35[deg]32'25'' N, longitude
077[deg]03'42'' W. The temporary safety zone will be enforced from 7:30
p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 8, 2012 and July 4, 2012, and will restrict
general navigation in the regulated area during the event. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel will be allowed to enter or remain in
the regulated area. These regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the event to enhance the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this regulation will restrict access to the area, the
effect of this rule will not be significant because: (i) The safety
zone will only be in effect from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 08,
2012 and July 4, 2012; (ii) the Coast Guard will give advance
notification via maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly; (iii) although the safety zone will apply to the section
of the Pamlico River and Tar River, vessel traffic will be able to
transit safely around the safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the specified portion of Pamlico River and Tar River from 7:30
p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 8, 2012 and July 4, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will only be in effect for three hours each day from 7:30 p.m. to
10:30 p.m. Although the safety zone will apply to a section of the
Pamlico River, vessel traffic will be able to transit safely around the
safety zone. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will issue
maritime advisories widely available to the users of the waterway.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any one year. Though this rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
[[Page 31185]]
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of this instruction. This rule establishes a temporary safety
zone to protect the public from fireworks fallout. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. At Sec. 165.506, in the Table to Sec. 165.506, make the following
amendments:
0
a. Under ``(d) Coast Guard Sector North Carolina--COTP Zone,'' suspend
entry 7, from June 7, 2012 through June 9, 2012, and from July 3, 2012
through July 8, 2012.
0
b. Under ``(d) Coast Guard Sector North Carolina--COTP Zone,'' add
entry 14, which will be enforced from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June
8, 2012 and from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2012, to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.506-T05-0097 Safety Zones; Fifth Coast Guard District
Fireworks Displays.
* * * * *
Table to Sec. 165.506
[All coordinates listed in the Table to Sec. 165.506 reference Datum
NAD 1983]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Date Location Regulated area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(d.) Coast Guard Sector North Carolina--COTP Zone
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
14.......... June 8, 2012, Pamlico River All waters of Pamlico
July 4, 2012. and Tar River, River and Tar River
Washington, NC, within a 300 yard
Safety Zone. radius of latitude
35[deg]32'25'' N,
longitude
077[deg]03'42'' W, a
position located on
the southwest shore
of the Pamlico
River, Washington,
NC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 31186]]
* * * * *
Dated: May 5, 2012.
Anthony Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012-12727 Filed 5-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P