Partial Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Washington: Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 30902-30903 [2012-12491]
Download as PDF
30902
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 101 / Thursday, May 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
0256, email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov,
or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, we mean
EPA. Information is organized as
follows:
[FR Doc. 2012–12497 Filed 5–23–12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2012–0112; FRL–9674–2]
Partial Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Washington:
Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is partially approving the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittal from the State of Washington
to demonstrate that the SIP meets the
requirements of section 110(a)(1) and (2)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) promulgated for ozone on July
18, 1997. EPA finds that the current
Washington SIP meets the following
110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C),
(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
(M), except for portions related to the
major source Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) permitting program
which is implemented under a Federal
Implementation Plan.
DATES: This action is effective on June
25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2012–0112. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and
Toxics (AWT–107), 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101. EPA
requests that you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt at telephone number: (206) 553–
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 May 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Scope of Action
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a
new NAAQS for ozone. EPA revised the
ozone NAAQS to provide an 8-hour
averaging period which replaced the
previous 1-hour averaging period, and
the level of the NAAQS was changed
from 0.12 parts per million (ppm) to
0.08 ppm (62 FR 38856). The CAA
requires SIPs meeting the requirements
of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) be
submitted by states within 3 years after
promulgation of a new or revised
standard. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2)
require states to address basic SIP
requirements, including emissions
inventories, monitoring, and modeling
to assure attainment and maintenance of
the standards, so-called ’’infrastructure’’
requirements. To help states meet this
statutory requirement for the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS, EPA issued
guidance to address infrastructure SIP
elements under section 110(a)(1) and
(2).1 In the case of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, states typically have met
the basic program elements required in
section 110(a)(2) through earlier SIP
submissions in connection with
previous ozone standards. The State of
Washington submitted a certification to
EPA on January 24, 2012, certifying that
Washington’s SIP meets the
infrastructure obligations for the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS. The certification
included an analysis of Washington’s
SIP as it relates to each section of the
infrastructure requirements with regard
to the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. On
March 6, 2012, EPA published a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the
State of Washington (77 FR 13238) to
partially approve the state’s
infrastructure SIP for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS. Specifically in the NPR, EPA
proposed approval of Washington’s SIP
as meeting the requirements for the
following 110(a)(2) infrastructure
1 William T. Harnett, Director, Air Quality Policy
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards. ‘‘Guidance on SIP Elements Required
Under Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 8-hour
Ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.’’ Memorandum to EPA Air Division
Directors, Regions I–X, October 2, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
elements for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), except for
portions related to the major source
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) permitting program which is
implemented under a Federal
Implementation Plan codified at 40 CFR
52.2497. Also, as discussed in the NPR,
this action does not address
110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(I). The
public comment period for EPA’s NPR
closed on April 5, 2012. EPA received
no comments on the proposed action.
Accordingly, EPA is taking final action
to approve the provisions as discussed
in the NPR.
II. Scope of Action
This partial SIP approval does not
extend to sources or activities located in
’’Indian Country’’ as defined in 18
U.S.C. 1151.2 Consistent with previous
Federal program approvals or
delegations, EPA will continue to
implement the Act in Indian Country
because Washington did not adequately
demonstrate authority over sources and
activities located within the exterior
boundaries of Indian reservations and
other areas of Indian Country. The one
exception is within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation, also known as the 1873
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe
of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly
provided state and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area. Therefore, EPA’s proposed SIP
approval applies to sources and
activities on nontrust lands within the
1873 Survey Area.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the January 24,
2012, SIP submittal from the State of
Washington to demonstrate that the SIP
meets the requirements of section
110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA for the
NAAQS promulgated for ozone on July
18, 1997. EPA is approving the
following section 110(a)(2)
infrastructure elements for Washington
2 ’’Indian country’’ is defined under 18 U.S.C.
1151 as: (1) All land within the limits of any Indian
reservation under the jurisdiction of the United
States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of
any patent, and including rights-of-way running
through the reservation, (2) all dependent Indian
communities within the borders of the United
States, whether within the original or subsequently
acquired territory thereof, and whether within or
without the limits of a State, and (3) all Indian
allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been
extinguished, including rights-of-way running
through the same. Under this definition, EPA treats
as reservations trust lands validly set aside for the
use of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been
formally designated as a reservation.
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 101 / Thursday, May 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
for the 1997 ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C),
(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
(M), except for portions related to the
major source Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) permitting program
which is implemented under a Federal
Implementation Plan codified at 40 CFR
52.2497. EPA is taking no action on
infrastructure elements (D)(i) and (I) for
the 1997 ozone NAAQS. This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
CAA.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 May 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 23, 2012.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
Matter, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 4, 2012.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30903
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq.
Subpart WW—Washington
2. Section 52.2491 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2491 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure
requirements.
On January 24, 2012, Washington
Department of Ecology submitted a
certification to address the requirements
of CAA Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA
approves the submittal as meeting the
following 110(a)(2) infrastructure
elements for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), except for
portions related to the major source
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) permitting program which is
implemented under a Federal
Implementation Plan codified at 40 CFR
52.2497.
[FR Doc. 2012–12491 Filed 5–23–12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 51 and 54
[WC Docket Nos. 10–90, 07–135, 05–337,
03–109; GN Docket No. 09–51; CC Docket
Nos. 01–92, 96–45; WT Docket No. 10–208;
FCC 11–161]
Connect America Fund; A National
Broadband Plan for Our Future;
Establishing Just and Reasonable
Rates for Local Exchange Carriers;
High-Cost Universal Service Support
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (Commission) published in
the Federal Register of May 8, 2012, a
document announcing the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval of information collections
associated with the Commission’s;
Connect America Fund; A National
Broadband Plan for Our Future;
Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates
for Local Exchange Carriers; High-Cost
Universal Service Support, Report and
Order, (Order), released on November
18, 2011. That notice was consistent
with the Order, which stated that the
Commission would publish a document
in the Federal Register announcing the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30902-30903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12491]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2012-0112; FRL-9674-2]
Partial Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans;
Washington: Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is partially approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittal from the State of Washington to demonstrate that the SIP
meets the requirements of section 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) for the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
promulgated for ozone on July 18, 1997. EPA finds that the current
Washington SIP meets the following 110(a)(2) infrastructure elements
for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), except for portions related to the major
source Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program
which is implemented under a Federal Implementation Plan.
DATES: This action is effective on June 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R10-OAR-2012-0112. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA
Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT-107), 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101. EPA requests that you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt at telephone number: (206)
553-0256, email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10
address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'',
``us'' or ``our'' are used, we mean EPA. Information is organized as
follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Scope of Action
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a new NAAQS for ozone. EPA
revised the ozone NAAQS to provide an 8-hour averaging period which
replaced the previous 1-hour averaging period, and the level of the
NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts per million (ppm) to 0.08 ppm (62 FR
38856). The CAA requires SIPs meeting the requirements of sections
110(a)(1) and (2) be submitted by states within 3 years after
promulgation of a new or revised standard. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2)
require states to address basic SIP requirements, including emissions
inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and
maintenance of the standards, so-called ''infrastructure''
requirements. To help states meet this statutory requirement for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, EPA issued guidance to address infrastructure
SIP elements under section 110(a)(1) and (2).\1\ In the case of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, states typically have met the basic program
elements required in section 110(a)(2) through earlier SIP submissions
in connection with previous ozone standards. The State of Washington
submitted a certification to EPA on January 24, 2012, certifying that
Washington's SIP meets the infrastructure obligations for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. The certification included an analysis of
Washington's SIP as it relates to each section of the infrastructure
requirements with regard to the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. On March 6,
2012, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the State
of Washington (77 FR 13238) to partially approve the state's
infrastructure SIP for the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Specifically in the NPR,
EPA proposed approval of Washington's SIP as meeting the requirements
for the following 110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L),
and (M), except for portions related to the major source Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program which is implemented
under a Federal Implementation Plan codified at 40 CFR 52.2497. Also,
as discussed in the NPR, this action does not address 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
and 110(a)(2)(I). The public comment period for EPA's NPR closed on
April 5, 2012. EPA received no comments on the proposed action.
Accordingly, EPA is taking final action to approve the provisions as
discussed in the NPR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ William T. Harnett, Director, Air Quality Policy Division,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. ``Guidance on SIP
Elements Required Under Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 8-
hour Ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.'' Memorandum to EPA Air Division Directors, Regions I-X,
October 2, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Scope of Action
This partial SIP approval does not extend to sources or activities
located in ''Indian Country'' as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.\2\
Consistent with previous Federal program approvals or delegations, EPA
will continue to implement the Act in Indian Country because Washington
did not adequately demonstrate authority over sources and activities
located within the exterior boundaries of Indian reservations and other
areas of Indian Country. The one exception is within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known as the 1873
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of
1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided state and local
agencies in Washington authority over activities on non-trust lands
within the 1873 Survey Area. Therefore, EPA's proposed SIP approval
applies to sources and activities on nontrust lands within the 1873
Survey Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ''Indian country'' is defined under 18 U.S.C. 1151 as: (1)
All land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the
jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the
issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through
the reservation, (2) all dependent Indian communities within the
borders of the United States, whether within the original or
subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or
without the limits of a State, and (3) all Indian allotments, the
Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-
of-way running through the same. Under this definition, EPA treats
as reservations trust lands validly set aside for the use of a Tribe
even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as a
reservation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the January 24, 2012, SIP submittal from the State
of Washington to demonstrate that the SIP meets the requirements of
section 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA for the NAAQS promulgated for
ozone on July 18, 1997. EPA is approving the following section
110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for Washington
[[Page 30903]]
for the 1997 ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L), and (M), except for portions related to the major source
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program which
is implemented under a Federal Implementation Plan codified at 40 CFR
52.2497. EPA is taking no action on infrastructure elements (D)(i) and
(I) for the 1997 ozone NAAQS. This action is being taken under section
110 of the CAA.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 23, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate Matter, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 4, 2012.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq.
Subpart WW--Washington
0
2. Section 52.2491 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2491 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.
On January 24, 2012, Washington Department of Ecology submitted a
certification to address the requirements of CAA Section 110(a)(1) and
(2) for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA approves the submittal as
meeting the following 110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K),
(L), and (M), except for portions related to the major source
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program which
is implemented under a Federal Implementation Plan codified at 40 CFR
52.2497.
[FR Doc. 2012-12491 Filed 5-23-12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P