Fiscal Year 2012 Draft Work Plan, 30509-30512 [2012-12462]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Notices
D. Estimate of whether the proposed
solution would cost the state additional
funding, and if so an approximation of
how much.
E. Your contact information so that
we can follow-up if we need any
clarifications.
Dated: May 16, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012–12419 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Notice To Extend Public Comment
Period for United States Air Force F–
35A Operational Basing Environmental
Impact Statement
AGENCY:
The United States Air Force,
DoD.
Notification of Extension of
Public Comment Period.
ACTION:
The U.S. Air Force is issuing
this notice to advise the public of an
extension to the public comment period.
The initial Notice of Availability
published in the Federal Register on
April 13, 2012 (Vol. 77, No. 72/Notices/
22315) requested public comments no
later than June 4, 2012. The Air Force
has extended the deadline for
submitting public comments to June 20,
2012. All substantive comments on the
Draft EIS received during the public
comment period will be considered in
the preparation of the Final EIS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please direct any written comments or
requests for information to Mr. Nicholas
Germanos, ACC/A7PS, 129 Andrews St.,
Suite 332, Langley AFB, VA 23665, ph:
757–764–9334.
SUMMARY:
Henry Williams Jr.,
DAF, Acting Air Force Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–12458 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
DENALI COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Fiscal Year 2012 Draft Work Plan
Denali Commission.
Notice; Correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Denali Commission
(Commission) is an independent federal
agency based on an innovative federalstate partnership designed to provide
critical utilities, infrastructure and
support for economic development and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
in training in Alaska by delivering
federal services in the most costeffective manner possible. The
Commission was created in 1998 with
passage of the October 21, 1998 Denali
Commission Act (Act) (Title III of Public
Law 105–277, 42 USC 3121). The Denali
Commission Act requires that the
Commission develop proposed work
plans for future spending and that the
annual Work Plan be published in the
Federal Register, providing an
opportunity for a 30-day period of
public review and written comment.
The Commission is republishing the
May 17, 2012 notice in full with
corrections included.
This Federal Register notice serves to
announce the 30-day opportunity for
public comment on the Denali
Commission Draft Work Plan for Federal
Fiscal Year 2012.
DATES: Comments and related material
to be received by June 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the
Denali Commission, Attention: Sabrina
Hoppas, 510 L Street, Suite 410,
Anchorage, AK 99501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Sabrina Hoppas, Denali
Commission, 510 L Street, Suite 410,
Anchorage, AK 99501. Telephone: (907)
271–1414. Email: shoppas@denali.gov.
Background
The Denali Commission
(Commission) is an independent federal
agency based on an innovative federalstate partnership designed to provide
critical utilities, infrastructure and
support for economic development and
training in Alaska by delivering federal
services in the most cost-effective
manner possible. The Commission was
created in 1998 with passage of the
October 21, 1998, Denali Commission
Act (Act) (Title III of Pub. L. 105–277,
42 USC 3121).
The Commission’s mission is to
partner with tribal, federal, state, and
local governments and collaborate with
all Alaskans to improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of
government services, to develop a welltrained labor force employed in a
diversified and sustainable economy,
and to build and ensure the operation
and maintenance of Alaska’s basic
infrastructure.
By creating the Commission, Congress
mandated that all parties involved
partner together to find new and
innovative solutions to the unique
infrastructure and economic
development challenges in America’s
most remote communities.
Pursuant to the Denali Commission
Act, as amended, the Commission
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30509
determines its own basic operating
principles and funding criteria on an
annual federal fiscal year (October 1 to
September 30) basis. The Commission
outlines these priorities and funding
recommendations in an annual Work
Plan. The Work Plan is adopted on an
annual basis in the following manner,
which occurs sequentially as listed:
• Commissioners first forward an
approved draft version of the Work Plan
to the Federal Co-Chair.
• The Federal Co-Chair approves the
draft Work Plan for publication in the
Federal Register providing an
opportunity for a 30-day period of
public review and written comment.
During this time, the draft Work Plan is
also disseminated widely to
Commission program partners
including, but not limited to the Bureau
of Indian Affairs (BIA), the Economic
Development Administration (EDA),
and the United States Department of
Agriculture—Rural Development
(USDA–RD).
• Public comment concludes and
Commission staff provides the Federal
Co-Chair with a summary of public
comment and recommendations, if any,
associated with the draft Work Plan.
• If no revisions are made to the draft,
the Federal Co-Chair provides notice of
approval of the Work Plan to the
Commissioners, and forwards the Work
Plan to the Secretary of Commerce for
approval; or, if there are revisions the
Federal Co-Chair provides notice of
modifications to the Commissioners for
their consideration and approval, and
upon receipt of approval from
Commissioners, forwards the Work Plan
to the Secretary of Commerce for
approval.
• The Secretary of Commerce
approves the Work Plan.
FY 2012 Annual Work Plan (Amended)
In FY 2011, the typical annual Work
Plan process was not carried out.
Several factors contributed to this
including continuing resolutions (CRs)
passed by Congress late in the fiscal
year resulting in latent consideration of
the FY 2011 annual Work Plan by the
Commissioners (Commissioners met on
June 2, 2011 to consider the FY 2011
annual Work Plan). In addition, the final
FY 2011 budget included a rescission of
$15,000,000 in prior year unobligated
funds and uncertainty on how the
rescission may impact the FY 2011
Work Plan was not resolved until
September 2011.
With concurrence from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and the
Secretary of Commerce, the amended
FY 2011 Work Plan will be processed
concurrently with the FY 2012 Work
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
30510
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Notices
Plan. The FY 2011 Work Plan and the
amended budget for the FY 2011 Work
Plan are not included as part of this FY
2012 Work Plan document.
FY 2012 Appropriations Summary
The Denali Commission has
historically received several federal
funding sources (identified by the
varying colors in the table below). These
fund sources are governed by the
following general principles:
• In FY 2012 no project specific
earmarks were directed.
• The Energy and Water
Appropriation is eligible for use in all
programs, but has historically been used
substantively to fund the Energy
Program.
• All other funds outlined below may
be used only for the specific program
area and may not be used across
programs. For instance, Federal Transit
Administration funding, which has in
the past been appropriated for the
Transportation Program, may not be
moved to the Energy Program.
• Final transportation funds received
may be reduced due to agency
modifications, reductions and fees
determined by the U.S. Department of
Transportation. Final program available
figures may not be provided until later
this spring.
• All Energy and Water
Appropriation funds, including
operational funds, designated as ‘‘up to’’
may be reassigned to the Legacy Energy
Program, Bulk Fuel and Rural Power
System Upgrades, if they are not fully
expended in a program component area
or a specific project.
• Total FY 2012 Budgetary Resources
provided:
These are the figures that appear in
the rows entitled ‘‘FY 2012
Appropriation’’ and are the original
appropriations amounts which do not
include Commission overhead
deductions. These funds are identified
by their source name (i.e., Energy and
Water Appropriation, USDA–RUS, etc.).
The grand total for all appropriations
appears at the end of the FY 2012
Funding Table.
• Total FY 2012 Program Available
Funding:
These are the figures that appear in
the rows entitled ‘‘FY 2012
Appropriations—Program Available’’
and are the amounts of funding
available for program(s) activities after
Commission overhead has been
deducted. The grand total for all
program available funds appears at the
end of the FY 2012 Funding Table.
• Program Funding:
These are the figures that appear in
the rows entitled with the specific
Program and Sub-Program area, and are
the amounts of funding the Draft FY
2012 Work Plan recommends, within
each program fund source for program
components.
• Subtotal of Program Funding:
These are the figures that appear in
rows entitled ‘‘subtotal’’ and are the
subtotals of all program funding within
a given fund source. The subtotal must
always equal the Total FY 2012 Program
Available Funding.
DENALI COMMISSION FY 2012 FUNDING TABLE
Totals
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FY 2012 Energy & Water Appropriation ..............................................................................................................................
FY 2012 Energy & Water Appropriation—Administrative Funds ........................................................................................
FY 2012 Energy & Water Appropriation—Program Available ............................................................................................
Total Energy Projects ..........................................................................................................................................................
Health ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Training Program .................................................................................................................................................................
Economic Development .......................................................................................................................................................
Solid Waste Program ...........................................................................................................................................................
Sponsorship Program ..........................................................................................................................................................
Sub-total $ ....................................................................................................................................................................
FY 2012 USDA, Rural Utilities Service (RUS)—pending estimate .....................................................................................
FY 2012 USDA, Rural Utilities Service (RUS)—Program Available (less 4% overhead) ..................................................
Bulk Fuel/RPSU Planning, Design & Construction .............................................................................................................
Sub-total $ ....................................................................................................................................................................
FY 2012 Trans Alaska Pipeline Liability (TAPL) Trust ........................................................................................................
FY 2012 Trans Alaska Pipeline Liability (TAPL)—Program Available (less 5% overhead) ...............................................
Bulk Fuel Planning, Design & Construction ........................................................................................................................
Sub-total $ ....................................................................................................................................................................
FY 2012 Federal Transit Administration (FTA)—Estimate ..................................................................................................
$5,000,000 from section 3011 (FTA) for docks and harbors.
FY 2012 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)—Estimate ...........................................................................................
For necessary, expenses for the Denali Access System Program as authorized under Section 1960 of Public Law
109–59
FY 2012 Transportation Program Available—(less 5%) .....................................................................................................
Transportation Program: Docks & Harbors .........................................................................................................................
Transportation Program: Roads –Estimate .........................................................................................................................
Sub-total $ ....................................................................................................................................................................
Total FY 2012 Federal Program Available ...........................................................................................................
FY 12 Program Details and General
Information
The following section provides
narrative discussion, by each of the
Commission Programs identified for
funding in the FY 2012 funding table
above.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
Energy Program
Basic Rural Energy Infrastructure
The Energy Program is the
Commission’s original program and
focuses on bulk fuel facilities (BFU) and
rural power system upgrades/power
generation (RPSU) across rural Alaska.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$10,679,000
3,294,000
7,385,000
7,385,000
0
0
0
0
0
7,385,000
2,900,000
2,784,000
2,784,000
2,784,000
6,800,000
6,460,000
6,460,000
6,460,000
5,000,000
0–24,700,000
4,750,000–28,215,000
4,750,000
0–23,465,000
4,750,000–28,215,000
21,379,000–44,844,000
About 94% of electricity in rural
communities is produced by diesel
generators and about half the fuel
storage in most villages is used for these
power plants for distribution.
Alternative means of generating power
can reduce the capacity needed for fuel
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Notices
30511
FY 2012 Program and Project Policy
Issues
are provided to EAC for feedback prior
to final grant execution.
Alternative/Renewable Program and
Emerging Technologies
The Energy Policy Act of 2005
established new authorities for the
Commission’s Energy Program with an
emphasis on alternative and renewable
energy projects. Although the 2005
Energy Policy Act did not include
appropriations, the Commission is
expected to carry out the intent of the
Act through a portion of its Energy and
Water Appropriation funding. To date,
the Commission has co-funded a
number of renewable projects and each
year new initiatives are considered.
After providing seed funding toward the
initiative, in 2007, the State of Alaska
passed legislation and funded the
Renewable Energy Fund (REF).
With the advent of the REF, State
resources to meet commercial-ready
renewable technology needs are
available, yet a gap in meeting the
emerging energy technology needs was
identified. Similar to the REF
partnership, the newly established
Emerging Energy Technology Fund
(EETF) was provided seed funding to
support demonstration projects for
applied research and further
technologies focusing on deployment in
rural Alaska. The EETF has since passed
the State Legislature, has formed its
selection process and is proceeding with
project selection.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
storage and ultimately reduce the cost of
power to the community.
The approved FY 2008 Denali
Commission Policy Document requires
and prioritizes cost share match for
funded projects. In implementing this
policy, 10%, match was required in FY
2010 and FY 2011. In FY 2012 new
statutory match is required in the
amounts of 50% for non-distressed and
20% for distressed communities and
only applies toward construction
projects using Energy and Water
Appropriation funding. In future
funding years, the Commission will
require consistent match for energy
projects funded with other funding
(TAPL, RUS). For FY 2012 funding, the
Commission will apply the 10% match
for RUS and TAPL funding and the 50%
and 20% match requirements for Energy
and Water Appropriation funding.
Transportation
Section 309 of the Denali Commission
Act 1998 (amended), created the
Commission’s Transportation Program,
including the Transportation Advisory
Committee. The advisory committee is
composed of nine members appointed
by the Governor of the State of Alaska
including the Chairman of the Denali
Commission; four members who
represent existing regional native
corporations, native nonprofit entities,
or tribal governments, including one
member who is a civil engineer; and
four members who represent rural
Alaska regions or villages, including one
member who is a civil engineer.
The Transportation Program
addresses two areas of rural Alaska
transportation infrastructure: roads and
waterfront development. There is
consensus among agencies and
communities that the program is
successfully addressing improvements
to local and regional transportation
systems. This is largely a function of the
TAC’s success at project selection and
monitoring, and the success of the
program’s project development partners.
The program is generally a
competitively-bid contractor or
materials-based project opportunity
grounded in Title 23 CFR. These strict
project development and construction
guidelines have presented some
challenges to the Commission’s ability
to respond quickly to targets of
opportunity, but they have also had the
positive effect of ensuring project design
and construction is executed at a
professional level. The program operates
under a reimbursable payment system
that requires local and program partner
sponsors to pay close attention to
accounting procedures prior to their
payments to contractors and vendors.
This system helps ensure project
payments are eligible when submitted to
the Commission.
In FY 2012 the program will continue
its focus on barge landings and mooring
points in rural communities. These
projects range from one or two mooring
points to secure a barge, to small dock
structures, depending on community
size and barge operation characteristics.
The value of these structures lies in
improved fuel/freight transfer
operations and improved worker and
environmental safety. The Commission
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) will continue to work through
the prioritized list of barge landing and
mooring point projects which were
identified in a formal analysis
conducted in FY 2009 and FY 2010. The
Other Renewable Initiatives
As the Renewable Energy Fund and
Emerging Energy Technology Fund
proceed, the Commission strives to
support their success. In 2011, the
Commission funded $300,000 toward
Renewable Energy Technical
Assistance, which resulted in match
funding from the Department of Energy
toward the newly established State
Technical Assistance Response Team
(START). The START effort provides
technical assistance to a select number
of communities to help assess energy
needs, deal with barriers and identify
funding options. To keep with the 2005
direction to fund renewable and
alternative energy, the FY 2012 Work
Plan includes $300,000 toward this
effort in 2012.
The FY 2011 Work Plan outlines a
strategy to balance the Energy Program
in both legacy and renewable
components, providing up to $2.4
million of available program funds
specifically toward the emerging
technology program pending state
match. If match for this program is not
provided, this funding shall be
reallocated to legacy projects.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
Sustainability Policy
All energy construction grants will
proceed after business plans are
reviewed and approved by Commission.
FY 2012 Project Selection Process
The Energy Advisory Committee
(EAC) provides guidance to
Commissioners and staff on the
program, and is comprised of members
involved in energy development in
Alaska. Members include
representatives of Associated General
Contractors, Alaska AFL–CIO,
Department of Energy National
Renewable Energy Lab, the University of
Alaska Institute of Northern
Engineering, USDA, Kotzebue Electric
Association and two public members
representing rural Alaska. The EAC
provided general recommendations
supporting the ongoing priority for
funding Bulk Fuel/Rural Power System
Upgrade planning, design and
construction, providing match funding
for the emerging energy technology
program and for renewable energy
regional planning in coordination with
the Alaska Energy Authority’s initiative
to meet statewide energy infrastructure
needs for all of the above.
Legacy Program (Bulk Fuel/RPSU)
Due to the nature of the due diligence
requirement of energy projects, seasonal
logistics in Alaska and funding
restrictions (i.e. TAPL funds may only
be used for bulk fuel projects)—a project
may not progress as quickly as another.
Given the late timing of funding in FY
2011, summer construction grants are
not anticipated. A final project list will
be developed based on available funds,
project readiness, available match and
other due diligence. Final project lists
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
30512
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Notices
universe of need for the first generation
of projects is in the range of
$40,000,000.
The TAC met on January 26–27, 2012
to select waterfront projects and will
meet in early summer to select road
project priorities for FY 2012. Final
project approvals and funding amounts
have been approved by the Federal CoChair and are available on the
Commission’s Web site.
As shown in the FY 2012 Funding
Table, the estimate for FHWA funding
ranges from $0 to $24,700,000. In 2011
continuing resolution language, the US
Secretary of Transportation was
assigned the responsibility by Congress
to identify FHWA projects and programs
that were sufficiently funded (i.e.
completed). In following this
assignment, the Secretary determined
that the Denali Access Program was
sufficiently funded and $13,300,000 in
FY 2011 FHWA funding was assigned to
the Alaska Department of
Transportation. At the request of the
Denali Commission Inspector General,
GAO is presently considering whether
the Secretary had the authority to make
this determination regarding the Denali
Access Program. At the time of drafting
this 2012 annual Work Plan, the GAO
Comptroller General has not yet issued
an opinion. Therefore, depending upon
the forthcoming opinion the
Commission may receive no FHWA
funding or potentially receive both FY
2011 and FY 2012 FHWA funding –
totaling $24,740,000.
Joel Neimeyer,
Federal Co-Chair.
[FR Doc. 2012–12462 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3300–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests; Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development; Strategies for Preparing
At-Risk Youth for Postsecondary
Success
Strategies for Preparing AtRisk Youth for Postsecondary Success
focuses on preventing students from
dropping out and preparing them for
postsecondary education or training.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before July 23,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding burden and/or the collection
activity requirements should be
electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or mailed to U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
Avenue SW., LBJ, Washington, DC
20202–4537. Copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 04858. When you access
the information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection and OMB Control Number
when making your request.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that Federal agencies provide interested
parties an early opportunity to comment
on information collection requests. The
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Privacy, Information
and Records Management Services,
Office of Management, publishes this
notice containing proposed information
collection requests at the beginning of
the Departmental review of the
information collection. The Department
of Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Strategies for
Preparing At-Risk Youth for
Postsecondary Success.
OMB Control Number: Pending.
Type of Review: New.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 132.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 114.
Abstract: Educators are increasingly
concerned about poor high school
graduation rates, especially among atrisk youth. Many of the programs
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
adopted by districts and schools to
decrease the dropout rate traditionally
set the goal of completing high school.
Programs that meet the dual goals of
supporting at-risk youth to graduate
from high school and then enroll in and
succeed in postsecondary education are
not commonly found in most school
districts and few studies of dropout
prevention programs have a
postsecondary focus. This study aims to
fill a gap by conducting qualitative case
studies of up to 15 sites. This study will
systematically analyze qualitative data
across multiple respondents to generate
portraits of programs and strategies that
the sites use, lessons based on
implementation successes and
challenges, and evidence suggesting
their effectiveness in improving the
outcomes of interest.
To complete the study, the U.S.
Department of Education is requesting
OMB approval of two related qualitative
data collection activities: (1) A phone
screen with local program managers to
determine the final sample of case
studies and (2) up to 15 site visits to a
purposive case study sample. Although
the lessons are not generalizable to a
larger population because the sample is
purposive and small, the case studies
will provide rich contextual information
to help practitioners assess the
applicability of the lessons in their own
schools or districts.
Dated: May 18, 2012.
Stephanie Valentine,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Privacy, Information and
Records Management Services, Office of
Management.
[FR Doc. 2012–12536 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Native American Career and Technical
Education Program; Final Waivers and
Extension of Project Period
Office of Vocational and Adult
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Overview Information: Final Waivers
and Extension of Project Period for the
Native American Career and Technical
Education Program
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.101A.
SUMMARY: For 60-month projects funded
in fiscal year (FY) 2007 under the Native
American Career and Technical
Education Program (NACTEP), the
Secretary waives 34 CFR 75.250 and
75.261(c)(2) in order to extend the
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30509-30512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12462]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DENALI COMMISSION
Fiscal Year 2012 Draft Work Plan
AGENCY: Denali Commission.
ACTION: Notice; Correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Denali Commission (Commission) is an independent federal
agency based on an innovative federal-state partnership designed to
provide critical utilities, infrastructure and support for economic
development and in training in Alaska by delivering federal services in
the most cost-effective manner possible. The Commission was created in
1998 with passage of the October 21, 1998 Denali Commission Act (Act)
(Title III of Public Law 105-277, 42 USC 3121). The Denali Commission
Act requires that the Commission develop proposed work plans for future
spending and that the annual Work Plan be published in the Federal
Register, providing an opportunity for a 30-day period of public review
and written comment. The Commission is republishing the May 17, 2012
notice in full with corrections included.
This Federal Register notice serves to announce the 30-day
opportunity for public comment on the Denali Commission Draft Work Plan
for Federal Fiscal Year 2012.
DATES: Comments and related material to be received by June 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the Denali Commission, Attention: Sabrina
Hoppas, 510 L Street, Suite 410, Anchorage, AK 99501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sabrina Hoppas, Denali Commission,
510 L Street, Suite 410, Anchorage, AK 99501. Telephone: (907) 271-
1414. Email: shoppas@denali.gov.
Background
The Denali Commission (Commission) is an independent federal agency
based on an innovative federal-state partnership designed to provide
critical utilities, infrastructure and support for economic development
and training in Alaska by delivering federal services in the most cost-
effective manner possible. The Commission was created in 1998 with
passage of the October 21, 1998, Denali Commission Act (Act) (Title III
of Pub. L. 105-277, 42 USC 3121).
The Commission's mission is to partner with tribal, federal, state,
and local governments and collaborate with all Alaskans to improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of government services, to develop a well-
trained labor force employed in a diversified and sustainable economy,
and to build and ensure the operation and maintenance of Alaska's basic
infrastructure.
By creating the Commission, Congress mandated that all parties
involved partner together to find new and innovative solutions to the
unique infrastructure and economic development challenges in America's
most remote communities.
Pursuant to the Denali Commission Act, as amended, the Commission
determines its own basic operating principles and funding criteria on
an annual federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30) basis. The
Commission outlines these priorities and funding recommendations in an
annual Work Plan. The Work Plan is adopted on an annual basis in the
following manner, which occurs sequentially as listed:
Commissioners first forward an approved draft version of
the Work Plan to the Federal Co-Chair.
The Federal Co-Chair approves the draft Work Plan for
publication in the Federal Register providing an opportunity for a 30-
day period of public review and written comment. During this time, the
draft Work Plan is also disseminated widely to Commission program
partners including, but not limited to the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA), the Economic Development Administration (EDA), and the United
States Department of Agriculture--Rural Development (USDA-RD).
Public comment concludes and Commission staff provides the
Federal Co-Chair with a summary of public comment and recommendations,
if any, associated with the draft Work Plan.
If no revisions are made to the draft, the Federal Co-
Chair provides notice of approval of the Work Plan to the
Commissioners, and forwards the Work Plan to the Secretary of Commerce
for approval; or, if there are revisions the Federal Co-Chair provides
notice of modifications to the Commissioners for their consideration
and approval, and upon receipt of approval from Commissioners, forwards
the Work Plan to the Secretary of Commerce for approval.
The Secretary of Commerce approves the Work Plan.
FY 2012 Annual Work Plan (Amended)
In FY 2011, the typical annual Work Plan process was not carried
out. Several factors contributed to this including continuing
resolutions (CRs) passed by Congress late in the fiscal year resulting
in latent consideration of the FY 2011 annual Work Plan by the
Commissioners (Commissioners met on June 2, 2011 to consider the FY
2011 annual Work Plan). In addition, the final FY 2011 budget included
a rescission of $15,000,000 in prior year unobligated funds and
uncertainty on how the rescission may impact the FY 2011 Work Plan was
not resolved until September 2011.
With concurrence from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
the Secretary of Commerce, the amended FY 2011 Work Plan will be
processed concurrently with the FY 2012 Work
[[Page 30510]]
Plan. The FY 2011 Work Plan and the amended budget for the FY 2011 Work
Plan are not included as part of this FY 2012 Work Plan document.
FY 2012 Appropriations Summary
The Denali Commission has historically received several federal
funding sources (identified by the varying colors in the table below).
These fund sources are governed by the following general principles:
In FY 2012 no project specific earmarks were directed.
The Energy and Water Appropriation is eligible for use in
all programs, but has historically been used substantively to fund the
Energy Program.
All other funds outlined below may be used only for the
specific program area and may not be used across programs. For
instance, Federal Transit Administration funding, which has in the past
been appropriated for the Transportation Program, may not be moved to
the Energy Program.
Final transportation funds received may be reduced due to
agency modifications, reductions and fees determined by the U.S.
Department of Transportation. Final program available figures may not
be provided until later this spring.
All Energy and Water Appropriation funds, including
operational funds, designated as ``up to'' may be reassigned to the
Legacy Energy Program, Bulk Fuel and Rural Power System Upgrades, if
they are not fully expended in a program component area or a specific
project.
Total FY 2012 Budgetary Resources provided:
These are the figures that appear in the rows entitled ``FY 2012
Appropriation'' and are the original appropriations amounts which do
not include Commission overhead deductions. These funds are identified
by their source name (i.e., Energy and Water Appropriation, USDA-RUS,
etc.). The grand total for all appropriations appears at the end of the
FY 2012 Funding Table.
Total FY 2012 Program Available Funding:
These are the figures that appear in the rows entitled ``FY 2012
Appropriations--Program Available'' and are the amounts of funding
available for program(s) activities after Commission overhead has been
deducted. The grand total for all program available funds appears at
the end of the FY 2012 Funding Table.
Program Funding:
These are the figures that appear in the rows entitled with the
specific Program and Sub-Program area, and are the amounts of funding
the Draft FY 2012 Work Plan recommends, within each program fund source
for program components.
Subtotal of Program Funding:
These are the figures that appear in rows entitled ``subtotal'' and
are the subtotals of all program funding within a given fund source.
The subtotal must always equal the Total FY 2012 Program Available
Funding.
Denali Commission FY 2012 Funding Table
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2012 Energy & Water Appropriation........... $10,679,000
FY 2012 Energy & Water Appropriation-- 3,294,000
Administrative Funds..........................
FY 2012 Energy & Water Appropriation--Program 7,385,000
Available.....................................
Total Energy Projects.......................... 7,385,000
Health......................................... 0
Training Program............................... 0
Economic Development........................... 0
Solid Waste Program............................ 0
Sponsorship Program............................ 0
Sub-total $................................ 7,385,000
FY 2012 USDA, Rural Utilities Service (RUS)-- 2,900,000
pending estimate..............................
FY 2012 USDA, Rural Utilities Service (RUS)-- 2,784,000
Program Available (less 4% overhead)..........
Bulk Fuel/RPSU Planning, Design & Construction. 2,784,000
Sub-total $................................ 2,784,000
FY 2012 Trans Alaska Pipeline Liability (TAPL) 6,800,000
Trust.........................................
FY 2012 Trans Alaska Pipeline Liability (TAPL)-- 6,460,000
Program Available (less 5% overhead)..........
Bulk Fuel Planning, Design & Construction...... 6,460,000
Sub-total $................................ 6,460,000
FY 2012 Federal Transit Administration (FTA)-- 5,000,000
Estimate......................................
$5,000,000 from section 3011 (FTA) for docks
and harbors...................................
FY 2012 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)-- 0-24,700,000
Estimate......................................
For necessary, expenses for the Denali Access
System Program as authorized under Section
1960 of Public Law 109-59
FY 2012 Transportation Program Available--(less 4,750,000-28,215,000
5%)...........................................
Transportation Program: Docks & Harbors........ 4,750,000
Transportation Program: Roads -Estimate........ 0-23,465,000
Sub-total $................................ 4,750,000-28,215,000
Total FY 2012 Federal Program Available 21,379,000-44,844,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 12 Program Details and General Information
The following section provides narrative discussion, by each of the
Commission Programs identified for funding in the FY 2012 funding table
above.
Energy Program
Basic Rural Energy Infrastructure
The Energy Program is the Commission's original program and focuses
on bulk fuel facilities (BFU) and rural power system upgrades/power
generation (RPSU) across rural Alaska. About 94% of electricity in
rural communities is produced by diesel generators and about half the
fuel storage in most villages is used for these power plants for
distribution. Alternative means of generating power can reduce the
capacity needed for fuel
[[Page 30511]]
storage and ultimately reduce the cost of power to the community.
Alternative/Renewable Program and Emerging Technologies
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 established new authorities for the
Commission's Energy Program with an emphasis on alternative and
renewable energy projects. Although the 2005 Energy Policy Act did not
include appropriations, the Commission is expected to carry out the
intent of the Act through a portion of its Energy and Water
Appropriation funding. To date, the Commission has co-funded a number
of renewable projects and each year new initiatives are considered.
After providing seed funding toward the initiative, in 2007, the State
of Alaska passed legislation and funded the Renewable Energy Fund
(REF).
With the advent of the REF, State resources to meet commercial-
ready renewable technology needs are available, yet a gap in meeting
the emerging energy technology needs was identified. Similar to the REF
partnership, the newly established Emerging Energy Technology Fund
(EETF) was provided seed funding to support demonstration projects for
applied research and further technologies focusing on deployment in
rural Alaska. The EETF has since passed the State Legislature, has
formed its selection process and is proceeding with project selection.
Other Renewable Initiatives
As the Renewable Energy Fund and Emerging Energy Technology Fund
proceed, the Commission strives to support their success. In 2011, the
Commission funded $300,000 toward Renewable Energy Technical
Assistance, which resulted in match funding from the Department of
Energy toward the newly established State Technical Assistance Response
Team (START). The START effort provides technical assistance to a
select number of communities to help assess energy needs, deal with
barriers and identify funding options. To keep with the 2005 direction
to fund renewable and alternative energy, the FY 2012 Work Plan
includes $300,000 toward this effort in 2012.
The FY 2011 Work Plan outlines a strategy to balance the Energy
Program in both legacy and renewable components, providing up to $2.4
million of available program funds specifically toward the emerging
technology program pending state match. If match for this program is
not provided, this funding shall be reallocated to legacy projects.
FY 2012 Program and Project Policy Issues
The approved FY 2008 Denali Commission Policy Document requires and
prioritizes cost share match for funded projects. In implementing this
policy, 10%, match was required in FY 2010 and FY 2011. In FY 2012 new
statutory match is required in the amounts of 50% for non-distressed
and 20% for distressed communities and only applies toward construction
projects using Energy and Water Appropriation funding. In future
funding years, the Commission will require consistent match for energy
projects funded with other funding (TAPL, RUS). For FY 2012 funding,
the Commission will apply the 10% match for RUS and TAPL funding and
the 50% and 20% match requirements for Energy and Water Appropriation
funding.
Sustainability Policy
All energy construction grants will proceed after business plans
are reviewed and approved by Commission.
FY 2012 Project Selection Process
The Energy Advisory Committee (EAC) provides guidance to
Commissioners and staff on the program, and is comprised of members
involved in energy development in Alaska. Members include
representatives of Associated General Contractors, Alaska AFL-CIO,
Department of Energy National Renewable Energy Lab, the University of
Alaska Institute of Northern Engineering, USDA, Kotzebue Electric
Association and two public members representing rural Alaska. The EAC
provided general recommendations supporting the ongoing priority for
funding Bulk Fuel/Rural Power System Upgrade planning, design and
construction, providing match funding for the emerging energy
technology program and for renewable energy regional planning in
coordination with the Alaska Energy Authority's initiative to meet
statewide energy infrastructure needs for all of the above.
Legacy Program (Bulk Fuel/RPSU)
Due to the nature of the due diligence requirement of energy
projects, seasonal logistics in Alaska and funding restrictions (i.e.
TAPL funds may only be used for bulk fuel projects)--a project may not
progress as quickly as another. Given the late timing of funding in FY
2011, summer construction grants are not anticipated. A final project
list will be developed based on available funds, project readiness,
available match and other due diligence. Final project lists are
provided to EAC for feedback prior to final grant execution.
Transportation
Section 309 of the Denali Commission Act 1998 (amended), created
the Commission's Transportation Program, including the Transportation
Advisory Committee. The advisory committee is composed of nine members
appointed by the Governor of the State of Alaska including the Chairman
of the Denali Commission; four members who represent existing regional
native corporations, native nonprofit entities, or tribal governments,
including one member who is a civil engineer; and four members who
represent rural Alaska regions or villages, including one member who is
a civil engineer.
The Transportation Program addresses two areas of rural Alaska
transportation infrastructure: roads and waterfront development. There
is consensus among agencies and communities that the program is
successfully addressing improvements to local and regional
transportation systems. This is largely a function of the TAC's success
at project selection and monitoring, and the success of the program's
project development partners. The program is generally a competitively-
bid contractor or materials-based project opportunity grounded in Title
23 CFR. These strict project development and construction guidelines
have presented some challenges to the Commission's ability to respond
quickly to targets of opportunity, but they have also had the positive
effect of ensuring project design and construction is executed at a
professional level. The program operates under a reimbursable payment
system that requires local and program partner sponsors to pay close
attention to accounting procedures prior to their payments to
contractors and vendors. This system helps ensure project payments are
eligible when submitted to the Commission.
In FY 2012 the program will continue its focus on barge landings
and mooring points in rural communities. These projects range from one
or two mooring points to secure a barge, to small dock structures,
depending on community size and barge operation characteristics. The
value of these structures lies in improved fuel/freight transfer
operations and improved worker and environmental safety. The Commission
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) will continue to work
through the prioritized list of barge landing and mooring point
projects which were identified in a formal analysis conducted in FY
2009 and FY 2010. The
[[Page 30512]]
universe of need for the first generation of projects is in the range
of $40,000,000.
The TAC met on January 26-27, 2012 to select waterfront projects
and will meet in early summer to select road project priorities for FY
2012. Final project approvals and funding amounts have been approved by
the Federal Co-Chair and are available on the Commission's Web site.
As shown in the FY 2012 Funding Table, the estimate for FHWA
funding ranges from $0 to $24,700,000. In 2011 continuing resolution
language, the US Secretary of Transportation was assigned the
responsibility by Congress to identify FHWA projects and programs that
were sufficiently funded (i.e. completed). In following this
assignment, the Secretary determined that the Denali Access Program was
sufficiently funded and $13,300,000 in FY 2011 FHWA funding was
assigned to the Alaska Department of Transportation. At the request of
the Denali Commission Inspector General, GAO is presently considering
whether the Secretary had the authority to make this determination
regarding the Denali Access Program. At the time of drafting this 2012
annual Work Plan, the GAO Comptroller General has not yet issued an
opinion. Therefore, depending upon the forthcoming opinion the
Commission may receive no FHWA funding or potentially receive both FY
2011 and FY 2012 FHWA funding - totaling $24,740,000.
Joel Neimeyer,
Federal Co-Chair.
[FR Doc. 2012-12462 Filed 5-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3300-01-P