Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; Wrightsville Beach, NC, 30445-30448 [2012-12459]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, because it involves the
establishment of a safety zone.
A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and a preliminary categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0353 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T09–0353 Safety Zone; Alexandria
Bay Chamber of Commerce, St. Lawrence
River, Alexandria Bay, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of the St.
Lawrence River, Alexandria Bay, NY
starting within a 1120FT radius of
position 44°20′38.48″ N, and
075°55′19.07″ W. (NAD 83)
(b) Enforcement Period. This
regulation will be enforced on July 4,
2012 from 8:45 p.m. until 10:05 p.m.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in section 165.23 of this
part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30445
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: May 3, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012–12455 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0368]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway; Wrightsville Beach, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway at Wrightsville Beach, North
Carolina. The safety zone will
temporarily restrict vessel movement
commencing Sept 1, 2012. The safety
zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of mariners on navigable waters
during maintenance on the U.S. 74/76
Bascule Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 283.1, at
Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 22, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
30446
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email CWO3 Joseph M. Edge, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector North Carolina; telephone
252–247–4525, email
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2012–0368) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2012–0368) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
North Carolina Department of
Transportation has awarded a contract
to American Bridge Company of
Coraopolis, PA to perform bridge
maintenance on the U.S. 74/76 Bascule
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Bridge crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 283.1, at Wrightsville
Beach, North Carolina. The contract
provides for cleaning, painting, steel
repair, and grid floor replacement to
commence on September 1, 2012 with a
completion date of May 1, 2013. The
contractor will utilize a 40 foot deck
barge with a 40 foot beam as a work
platform and for equipment staging.
This safety zone is needed to provide a
safety buffer to transiting vessels as
bridge repairs present potential hazards
to mariners and property due to
reduction horizontal clearance.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing a
temporary safety zone that would
encompass the waters directly under the
U.S. 74/76 Bascule Bridge crossing the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile
283.1, at Wrightsville Beach, North
Carolina (34°13′07″ N, 077°48′46″ W).
All vessels transiting the this section of
the waterway requiring a horizontal
clearance of greater than 50 feet will be
required to make a one hour advanced
notification to the U.S. 74/76 Bascule
Bridge tender while the safety zone is in
effect. This zone will be in effect from
8 a.m. September 1, 2012 through 8 p.m.
May 1, 2013.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule would not restrict
traffic from transiting a portion of the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, it
imposes a one hour notification to
ensure the waterway is clear of
impediment to allow passage to vessels
requiring a horizontal clearance of
greater than 50 feet.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
rule would affect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities:
the owners or operators of commercial
tug and barge companies, recreational
and commercial fishing vessels
intending to transit the specified portion
of Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from
8 a.m. September 1, 2012 through 8 p.m.
May 1, 2013.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Although the
safety zone will apply to this section of
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
vessel traffic will be able to request
passage by providing a one hour
advanced notification. Before the
effective period, the Coast Guard will
issue maritime advisories widely
available to the users of the waterway.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
30447
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely
to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
30448
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0368 to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.T05–0368 Safety Zone; Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, Wrightsville Beach,
NC.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: This zone includes the
waters directly under and 100 yards
either side of the U.S. 74/76 Bascule
Bridge crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 283.1, at Wrightsville
Beach, North Carolina (34°13′07″ N
077°48′46″ W).
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.23 apply to the safety zone created
by this temporary section, § 165.T05–
0368. In addition the following
regulations apply:
(1) All vessels and persons are
prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port North Carolina.
(2) All vessels requiring greater than
50 feet horizontal clearance to safely
transit through the U.S. 74/76 Bascule
Bridge crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 283.1, at Wrightsville
Beach, North Carolina must contact the
bridge tender on VHF–FM marine band
radio channels 13 and 16 one hour in
advance of intended transit.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage within the zone must
request authorization from the Captain
of the Port North Carolina or his
designated representative by telephone
at (910) 343–3882 or on VHF–FM
marine band radio channel 16.
(4) All Coast Guard assets enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio channels
13 and 16.
(5) The operator of any vessel within
or in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall: (i) Stop the vessel
immediately upon being directed to do
so by any commissioned, warrant or
petty officer on board a vessel
displaying a Coast Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port
North Carolina means the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina or
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
or petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port to act on his
behalf.
(2) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port
North Carolina to assist in enforcing the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted by Federal, State
and local agencies in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. September
1, 2012 through 8 p.m. May 1, 2013
unless cancelled earlier by the Captain
of the Port.
Dated: May 10, 2012.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
Port Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012–12459 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0354]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; A Salute to Our Heroes
Fireworks, Hamlin Beach State Park,
Hamlin, NY
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LT Christopher
Mercurio, Chief of Waterway
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo; telephone 716–843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
AGENCY:
Submitting Comments
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on
Hamlin Beach State Park, Hamlin, NY.
This proposed rule is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of water
off Hamlin Beach State Park during the
A Salute to Our Heroes on July 07, 2012.
The safety zone established by this
proposed rule is necessary to protect
spectators, participants, and vessels
from the hazards associated with
firework display.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0354 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2012–0354),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30445-30448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12459]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0368]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; Wrightsville Beach,
NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville
Beach, North Carolina. The safety zone will temporarily restrict vessel
movement commencing Sept 1, 2012. The safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of mariners on navigable waters during
maintenance on the U.S. 74/76 Bascule Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 283.1, at Wrightsville Beach, North
Carolina.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 22, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
[[Page 30446]]
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries accepted between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email CWO3 Joseph M. Edge, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina; telephone 252-247-4525, email Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0368) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0368) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
North Carolina Department of Transportation has awarded a contract
to American Bridge Company of Coraopolis, PA to perform bridge
maintenance on the U.S. 74/76 Bascule Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 283.1, at Wrightsville Beach, North
Carolina. The contract provides for cleaning, painting, steel repair,
and grid floor replacement to commence on September 1, 2012 with a
completion date of May 1, 2013. The contractor will utilize a 40 foot
deck barge with a 40 foot beam as a work platform and for equipment
staging. This safety zone is needed to provide a safety buffer to
transiting vessels as bridge repairs present potential hazards to
mariners and property due to reduction horizontal clearance.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing a temporary safety zone that would
encompass the waters directly under the U.S. 74/76 Bascule Bridge
crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile 283.1, at
Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina (34[deg]13'07'' N, 077[deg]48'46''
W). All vessels transiting the this section of the waterway requiring a
horizontal clearance of greater than 50 feet will be required to make a
one hour advanced notification to the U.S. 74/76 Bascule Bridge tender
while the safety zone is in effect. This zone will be in effect from 8
a.m. September 1, 2012 through 8 p.m. May 1, 2013.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule would not
restrict traffic from transiting a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, it imposes a one hour notification to ensure the waterway is
clear of impediment to allow passage to vessels requiring a horizontal
clearance of greater than 50 feet.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies
[[Page 30447]]
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of commercial tug and
barge companies, recreational and commercial fishing vessels intending
to transit the specified portion of Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from
8 a.m. September 1, 2012 through 8 p.m. May 1, 2013.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons.
Although the safety zone will apply to this section of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, vessel traffic will be able to request passage
by providing a one hour advanced notification. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will issue maritime advisories widely available
to the users of the waterway. If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a temporary safety zone. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[[Page 30448]]
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0368 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0368 Safety Zone; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Wrightsville Beach, NC.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: This zone
includes the waters directly under and 100 yards either side of the
U.S. 74/76 Bascule Bridge crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
mile 283.1, at Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina (34[deg]13'07'' N
077[deg]48'46'' W).
(b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.23 apply to the safety zone created by this temporary section,
Sec. 165.T05-0368. In addition the following regulations apply:
(1) All vessels and persons are prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port North
Carolina.
(2) All vessels requiring greater than 50 feet horizontal clearance
to safely transit through the U.S. 74/76 Bascule Bridge crossing the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile 283.1, at Wrightsville Beach,
North Carolina must contact the bridge tender on VHF-FM marine band
radio channels 13 and 16 one hour in advance of intended transit.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage within the
zone must request authorization from the Captain of the Port North
Carolina or his designated representative by telephone at (910) 343-
3882 or on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 16.
(4) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be
contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channels 13 and 16.
(5) The operator of any vessel within or in the immediate vicinity
of this safety zone shall: (i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being
directed to do so by any commissioned, warrant or petty officer on
board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port North Carolina means the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(2) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port North Carolina to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted by Federal,
State and local agencies in the patrol and enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m.
September 1, 2012 through 8 p.m. May 1, 2013 unless cancelled earlier
by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: May 10, 2012.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012-12459 Filed 5-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P