Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY, 30451-30453 [2012-12453]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: May 3, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012–12464 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0351]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake
Ontario, Olcott, NY
Submitting Comments
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on
Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY. This proposed
rule is intended to restrict vessels from
a portion of Lake Ontario during the
Olcott fireworks display. The safety
zone established by this proposed rule
is necessary to protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with firework
display.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0351 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LT Christopher
Mercurio, Chief of Waterway
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo; telephone 716–843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
ACTION:
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2012–0351),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2012–0351 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30451
line associated with this rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2012–0351 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Between 10 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. on
July 3, 2012 a fireworks display will
take place on Lake Ontario near Olcott,
NY. The Captain of the Port Buffalo has
determined that fireworks launched
proximate to watercraft presents
significant hazards to public spectators
and participants. Such hazards include
premature detonations, dangerous
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
30452
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
detonations, dangerous projectiles, and
falling or burning debris.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone will be
effective and enforced from 9:30 p.m.
until 11 p.m. on July 3, 2012. The
proposed safety zone will encompass all
waters of Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY
within a 1120 FT radius of position
43°20′23.57″ N and 78°43′09.50″ W
(NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the proposed safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his onscene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
This proposed temporary safety zone
is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the Olcott
Fireworks.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will
not interfere with other agencies, will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients, and will not
raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zone created by this
proposed rule will be relatively small
and enforced for a relatively short time.
Also, the safety zone is designed to
minimize its impact on navigable
waters. Furthermore, the safety zone has
been designed to allow vessels to transit
around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel
movement within that particular area
are expected to be minimal. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels
may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by the Captain of the
Port.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed temporary final rule
may affect the following entities, some
of which might be small entities: the
owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in a portion of Lake
Ontario near Olcott, New York between
9:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 3, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: this rule will be
in effect for only 90 minutes and the
safety zone will allow vessels to move
freely around the safety zone on Lake
Ontario. If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If this proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of
Waterway Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716–
843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, because it involves the
establishment of a safety zone.
A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and a preliminary categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0351 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T09–0351 Safety Zone; Olcott
Fireworks, Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of Lake Ontario,
Olcott, NY within a 1120 FT radius of
position 43°20′23.57″ N and
78°43′09.50″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This regulation is effective and will be
enforced on July 3, 2012 from 9:30 p.m.
until 11 p.m.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in section 165.23 of this
part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30453
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: May 3, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012–12453 Filed 5–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0347; FRL–9677–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Milwaukee-Racine
Nonattainment Area; Determination of
Attainment for the 2006 24-Hour Fine
Particle Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
public comment period.
AGENCY:
EPA is extending the
comment period for a proposed rule
published April 24, 2012 (77 FR 24436).
On April 24, 2012, EPA proposed to
approve a determination of attainment
for the Milwaukee-Racine, Wisconsin
area for the 2006 24-hour fine particle
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
submitted by the State of Wisconsin on
March 7, 2011. In response to a May 1,
2012, request from David C. Bender,
EPA is extending the comment period
for 30 days.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published April 24, 2012
(77 FR 24436) is being extended for 30
days to June 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2011–0347, to: Douglas Aburano,
Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
Additional instructions to comment can
be found in the notice of proposed
rulemaking published April 24, 2012
(77 FR 24436).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30451-30453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12453]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0351]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY. This proposed rule is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of Lake Ontario during the Olcott fireworks
display. The safety zone established by this proposed rule is necessary
to protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the hazards
associated with firework display.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0351 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of Waterway
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9343,
email SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0351), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2012-0351 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2012-0351 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to
use the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
Between 10 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. on July 3, 2012 a fireworks display
will take place on Lake Ontario near Olcott, NY. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo has determined that fireworks launched proximate to
watercraft presents significant hazards to public spectators and
participants. Such hazards include premature detonations, dangerous
[[Page 30452]]
detonations, dangerous projectiles, and falling or burning debris.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone will be effective and enforced from 9:30
p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 3, 2012. The proposed safety zone will
encompass all waters of Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY within a 1120 FT
radius of position 43[deg]20'23.57'' N and 78[deg]43'09.50'' W (NAD
83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the proposed safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
This proposed temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of spectators and vessels during the Olcott Fireworks.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies,
will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients,
and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zone
created by this proposed rule will be relatively small and enforced for
a relatively short time. Also, the safety zone is designed to minimize
its impact on navigable waters. Furthermore, the safety zone has been
designed to allow vessels to transit around it. Thus, restrictions on
vessel movement within that particular area are expected to be minimal.
Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through
the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed temporary final rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of
Lake Ontario near Olcott, New York between 9:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July
3, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: this
rule will be in effect for only 90 minutes and the safety zone will
allow vessels to move freely around the safety zone on Lake Ontario. If
you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If this
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact LT Christopher
Mercurio, Chief of Waterway Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
[[Page 30453]]
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, because it involves the establishment of a safety zone.
A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and a preliminary
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0351 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0351 Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake Ontario,
Olcott, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Ontario, Olcott, NY within a 1120 FT radius of position
43[deg]20'23.57'' N and 78[deg]43'09.50'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. This regulation is effective
and will be enforced on July 3, 2012 from 9:30 p.m. until 11 p.m.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in section 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his
behalf. The on-scene representative of the Captain of the Port Buffalo
is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: May 3, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012-12453 Filed 5-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P