Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Final 2012 Spiny Dogfish Fishery Specifications, 30224-30226 [2012-12366]
Download as PDF
30224
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
* Elevation in
feet (NGVD)
+ Elevation in
feet (NAVD)
# Depth in feet
above ground
∧ Elevation in
meters (MSL)
Modified
Flooding source(s)
Location of referenced elevation
East Fork Trinity River ..............
Just upstream of Union Pacific Railroad .............................
+389
+398
Mustang Creek .........................
Approximately 0.85 mile upstream of the Rockwell-Forney
Dam.
Approximately 0.51 mile upstream of Shady Brook Lane ..
Unnamed Tributary to Kings
Creek.
Approximately 0.51 mile upstream of Ridgecrest Road .....
Approximately 1,600 feet upstream of the confluence with
Kings Creek (Upper Reach).
+480
+486
Approximately 0.91 mile upstream of the confluence with
Kings Creek (Upper Reach).
+506
+413
Communities affected
City of Dallas, City of Heath,
Unincorporated Areas of
Kaufman County.
City of Forney, Unincorporated Areas of Kaufman
County.
City of Terrell, Unincorporated Areas of Kaufman
County.
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
# Depth in feet above ground.
∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
ADDRESSES
City of Dallas
Maps are available
City of Forney
Maps are available
City of Heath
Maps are available
City of Mabank
Maps are available
City of Terrell
Maps are available
for inspection at 320 East Jefferson Boulevard, Room 307, Dallas, TX 75203.
for inspection at City Hall, 101 West Main Street, Forney, TX 75126.
for inspection at City Hall, 200 Laurence Drive, Heath, TX 75032.
for inspection at City Hall, 129 East Market Street, Mabank, TX 75147.
for inspection at City Hall, 201 East Nash Street, Terrell, TX 75160.
Unincorporated Areas of Kaufman County
Maps are available for inspection at the Kaufman County Courthouse, 100 West Mulberry Street, Kaufman, TX 75142.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
Dated: May 3, 2012.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. 120213130–2435–02]
RIN 0648–XA973
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Final 2012 Spiny Dogfish
Fishery Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 May 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
This rule implements a catch
limit, commercial quota, and possession
limit for the spiny dogfish fishery for
the 2012 fishing year. The action was
developed by the Mid-Atlantic and New
England Fishery Management Councils
pursuant to the fishery specification
requirements of the Spiny Dogfish
Fishery Management Plan. The final
management measures are supported by
the best available scientific information
and reflect recent increases in spiny
dogfish biomass. The action is expected
to result in positive economic impacts
for the spiny dogfish fishery while
maintaining the conservation objectives
of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery
Management Plan.
DATES: This rule is effective June 21,
2012, through April 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: An environmental
assessment (EA) was prepared that
describes the action and other
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2012–12292 Filed 5–21–12; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
considered alternatives and provides a
thorough analysis of the impacts of the
proposed measures and alternatives.
Copies of the EA and the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
are available on request from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive
Director, Mid Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N.
State St., Dover, DE 19901. The EA/
IRFA is also accessible via the Internet
at https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9273; fax: (978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias)
were declared overfished by NMFS in
1998. Consequently, the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act) required NMFS to implement
measures to end overfishing and rebuild
the spiny dogfish stock. The MidAtlantic Fishery Management Council
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(MAFMC) and the New England Fishery
Management Council (NEFMC)
developed a joint fishery management
plan (FMP) that was implemented in
2000. As a result of the conservation
measures in the FMP, the spiny dogfish
stock was declared to be successfully
rebuilt in 2010.
The regulations implementing the
FMP at 50 CFR part 648, subpart L,
outline the process for specifying an
annual catch limit (ACL), commercial
quota, possession limit, and other
management measures for a period of 1–
5 years. The annual quota is allocated to
two semi-annual quota periods, as
follows: Period 1, May 1 through
October 31 (57.9 percent); and Period 2,
November 1 through April 30 (42.1
percent).
The MAFMC’s Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) reviews the
best available information on the status
of the spiny dogfish population and
makes recommendations on acceptable
biological catch (ABC). This
recommendation is then used as the
basis for catch limits and other
management measures developed by the
MAFMC’s Spiny Dogfish Monitoring
Committee and Joint Spiny Dogfish
Committee (which includes members of
the NEFMC). The MAFMC and NEFMC
then review the recommendations of the
committees and make their specification
recommendations to NMFS. NMFS
reviews those recommendations, and
may modify them if necessary to ensure
that they are consistent with the FMP
and other applicable law. NMFS then
publishes proposed measures for public
comment. NMFS proposed the
specifications set here in the Federal
Register on March 19, 2012 (77 FR
15991), with a 30-day public comment
period. NMFS received six comments,
which are addressed below.
A detailed description of how the
2012 spiny dogfish ABC and associated
specification measures were derived,
and the range of alternatives analyzed,
are provided in the proposed rule and
in its supplementary materials (see
ADDRESSES), and are not repeated here.
The final approved specifications for the
2012 spiny dogfish fishery are described
below.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Final Measures
NMFS is implementing the following
specifications for the spiny dogfish
fishery for the 2012 fishing year:
1. The spiny dogfish annual catch
limit (ACL) is 44.737 million lb (20,292
mt);
2. The spiny dogfish commercial
quota is 35.694 million lb (16,191 mt);
and,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 May 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
3. The spiny dogfish possession limit
remains at 3,000 lb (1,361 kg) per trip.
Based on the percentage allocations
specified in the FMP, quota Period 1
(May 1 through October 31) is allocated
20.667 million lb (9,374 mt), and quota
Period 2 (November 1 through April 30)
is allocated 15.027 million lb (6,816 mt).
The significant quota increase from
fishing year 2011 quota, in conjunction
with the status quo possession limit,
should help avoid prolonged fishery
closures, extend the fishing season,
reduce regulatory discards, and
maximize revenues for vessels that land
spiny dogfish.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received six comments to the
proposed specifications. These
commenters offered five distinct
comments.
Comment 1: Two Massachusettsbased commercial fishing organizations
commented that they support the
proposed spiny dogfish commercial
quota and possession limit.
Response: NMFS agrees that the final
commercial quota and status quo
possession limit meet the objectives of
the Spiny Dogfish FMP and will
maximize landings for the fishery
during the 2012 fishing year.
Comment 2: The North Carolina
Division of Marine Fisheries
commented that it supports the
proposed quota, but recommended that
the possession limit be increased to
4,000 lb (1,815 kg), consistent with the
MAFMC’s recommendation.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
spiny dogfish possession limit should
be increased. NMFS considers the 3,000
lb (1,361 kg) possession limit to be the
most appropriate spiny dogfish
possession limit for the 2012 fishing
year. As noted above, NMFS believes
that the status quo possession limit in
conjunction with the increased quota
has the greatest likelihood of prolonging
the fishing season, and of preventing
mid-season fishery closures and their
associated negative economic impacts.
NMFS expects these specifications will
distribute spiny dogfish landings and
revenues across the fishing year, rather
than increasing per-trip revenues under
a shorter fishing season. The Atlantic
States Marine Fisheries Commission
(Commission) has also implemented
this possession limit in state waters for
2012.
Comment 3: One fishing industry
commenter argued that the science used
in the spiny dogfish stock assessment
and for setting specifications is flawed.
The commenter suggested that spiny
dogfish biomass has been
underestimated, and that catch limits
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30225
for female spiny dogfish should be
between 66 and 75 million lb (30,000–
34,000 mt), while catch limits for male
spiny dogfish should be between 70 and
100 million lb (32,000–45,000 mt). The
commenter further argued that the high
biomass of male dogfish contributes to
predation on spiny dogfish pups and
more valuable groundfish species, and
suggested that a male-only spiny dogfish
fishery should be implemented.
Response: National Standard 2 of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that
fishery management measures be based
upon the best available scientific
information. The final catch limits and
specifications being implemented by
this rule represent the best available
scientific information. They are based
on the results of peer-reviewed stock
assessments, the recommendations of
the SSC, and the goals of the FMP. A
description of how the 2012 spiny
dogfish catch limits were calculated is
given in the proposed rule for this
action. There is no scientific
justification for specifying the catch
limits at the levels recommended by the
commenter, and such high limits would
be inconsistent with the requirements of
the FMP. The issue of a male-only spiny
dogfish fishery is beyond the scope of
this rule, and would require an
amendment to the FMP. NMFS notes
that the MAFMC and NEFMC are
currently developing Amendment 3 to
the Spiny Dogfish FMP, but have
removed from the range of alternatives
consideration of male-only spiny
dogfish management measures.
Comment 4: One comment submitted
by a conservation organization opposed
the proposed spiny dogfish commercial
quota, and recommended that the quota
only be increased to 30 million lb
(13,608 mt), consistent with the
Commission’s initial 2012 quota
recommendation. The commenter cited
numerous concerns with the status of
the spiny dogfish stock, including
vulnerable life history traits, poor pup
production, projected future declines in
spawning stock biomass, declines in the
average size of pups and mature
females, skewed sex ratios, and several
sources of uncertainty in the stock
assessment. The commenter argued that
the proposed quota represents an
unnecessarily high increase that is not
in the best long-term interests of the
fishery. Additionally, the commenter
suggested that the MAFMC’s risk policy
used to calculate the spiny dogfish ABC
(i.e., using the catch level that
corresponds to a 40-percent probability
of overfishing) should be more
precautionary given the stock’s inherent
vulnerability. For comparison, the
commenter noted that the Atlantic
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
30226
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Highly Migratory Species Fishery
Management Plan for coastal sharks
uses a 70-percent probability of success
to select management measures, and
there should be less than a 20-percent
chance of a management measure
resulting in a stock decline.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
commercial quota of 35.694 million lb
(16,191 mt) recommended by both
Councils represents a dramatic increase
from earlier quota levels that favors
short-term yield over long-term fishery
stability. NMFS also acknowledges that
all of the other listed concerns with
spiny dogfish stock status are valid.
Most importantly, spiny dogfish
spawning stock biomass is projected to
decline significantly between 2014 and
2020 due to poor pup production.
However, while the proposed quota
represents the upper limit of the range
of acceptable quota alternatives, it is not
expected to result in overfishing. If
spiny dogfish biomass declines in future
years, harvest levels will have to be
appropriately reduced in those years.
While a 30-million-lb (13,608-mt) quota
may be a more precautionary and
stabilizing recommendation, the quota
set here still reflects the best available
scientific information, and is consistent
with the recommendations of the SSC
and the requirements of the FMP and
Magnuson-Stevens Act. Therefore, there
is no compelling biological or legal
justification to reject the commercial
quota recommendation of both
Councils.
Comment 5: One public commenter
argued that the spiny dogfish quota
should be reduced by 50 percent, to 10
million lb (4,536 mt). No justification
was provided for this reduction.
Response: NMFS disagrees that such
a reduction in spiny dogfish harvest
levels is necessary at this time. Spiny
dogfish spawning stock biomass has
been increasing in recent years, and is
currently above target levels. The
proposed increase in quota is supported
by the best available scientific
information and follows the ABC and
specification process defined in the
FMP.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has made a
determination that this rule is consistent
with the Spiny Dogfish FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law.
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this rule is not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 May 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Pursuant to section 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), NMFS
has prepared a Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) in support
of this action. The FRFA incorporates
the IRFA, a summary of the significant
issues raised by the public comments in
response to the IRFA, NMFS’ responses
to those comments, relevant analyses
contained in the action and its EA, and
a summary of the analyses completed to
support the action in this rule. A copy
of the analyses done in the action and
EA are available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA
was published in the proposed rule for
this action and is not repeated here. A
description of why this action was
considered, the objectives of, and the
legal basis for this rule is contained in
the preamble to the proposed rule and
this final rule and is not repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues
Raised by the Public in Response to the
IRFA, a Summary of the Agency’s
Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the
Proposed Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
Six comments were received on the
proposed rule. For a summary of the
comments, and NMFS’s responses to
them, see the Comments and Responses
section above. None of the comments
raised issues or concerns related to the
IRFA, and no changes were made to the
rule as a result of the comments.
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities To Which the Rule Would
Apply
The increase in the spiny dogfish
commercial quota would impact vessels
that hold Federal open access
commercial spiny dogfish permits, and
participate in the spiny dogfish fishery.
According to MAFMC’s analysis, 2,942
vessels were issued spiny dogfish
permits in 2010. However, only 326
vessels landed any amount of spiny
dogfish. While the fishery extends from
Maine to North Carolina, most active
vessels were from (in descending order)
Massachusetts, New Jersey, New
Hampshire, Rhode Island, New York,
North Carolina, and Virginia.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
This action does not introduce any
new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance requirements. This rule
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with other Federal rules.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes
The purpose of this action is to
increase spiny dogfish catch limits and
landings, consistent with the best
available science, thereby extending the
duration of the fishing season and
increasing revenue relative to the status
quo. The action is expected to maximize
the short-term profitability for the spiny
dogfish fishery during the 2012 fishing
year, without jeopardizing the long-term
sustainability of the stock. Therefore,
the economic impacts resulting from the
action are expected to be positive, and
there were no other alternatives
considered that could have further
increased the economic yield from the
fishery while remaining constant with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the goals
of the FMP.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a letter to permit
holders that also serves as small entity
compliance guide (the guide) was
prepared. Copies of this final rule are
available from the Northeast Regional
Office, and the guide, i.e., permit holder
letter, will be sent to all holders of
permits for the spiny dogfish fishery.
The guide and this final rule will be
available upon request, and posted on
the Northeast Regional Office’s Web site
at www.nero.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 16, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–12366 Filed 5–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30224-30226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12366]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 120213130-2435-02]
RIN 0648-XA973
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Final 2012 Spiny
Dogfish Fishery Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a catch limit, commercial quota, and
possession limit for the spiny dogfish fishery for the 2012 fishing
year. The action was developed by the Mid-Atlantic and New England
Fishery Management Councils pursuant to the fishery specification
requirements of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Management Plan. The final
management measures are supported by the best available scientific
information and reflect recent increases in spiny dogfish biomass. The
action is expected to result in positive economic impacts for the spiny
dogfish fishery while maintaining the conservation objectives of the
Spiny Dogfish Fishery Management Plan.
DATES: This rule is effective June 21, 2012, through April 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared that describes
the action and other considered alternatives and provides a thorough
analysis of the impacts of the proposed measures and alternatives.
Copies of the EA and the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA), are available on request from Dr. Christopher M. Moore,
Executive Director, Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201,
800 N. State St., Dover, DE 19901. The EA/IRFA is also accessible via
the Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281-9273; fax: (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) were declared overfished by NMFS
in 1998. Consequently, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) required NMFS to implement
measures to end overfishing and rebuild the spiny dogfish stock. The
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council
[[Page 30225]]
(MAFMC) and the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC)
developed a joint fishery management plan (FMP) that was implemented in
2000. As a result of the conservation measures in the FMP, the spiny
dogfish stock was declared to be successfully rebuilt in 2010.
The regulations implementing the FMP at 50 CFR part 648, subpart L,
outline the process for specifying an annual catch limit (ACL),
commercial quota, possession limit, and other management measures for a
period of 1-5 years. The annual quota is allocated to two semi-annual
quota periods, as follows: Period 1, May 1 through October 31 (57.9
percent); and Period 2, November 1 through April 30 (42.1 percent).
The MAFMC's Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) reviews the
best available information on the status of the spiny dogfish
population and makes recommendations on acceptable biological catch
(ABC). This recommendation is then used as the basis for catch limits
and other management measures developed by the MAFMC's Spiny Dogfish
Monitoring Committee and Joint Spiny Dogfish Committee (which includes
members of the NEFMC). The MAFMC and NEFMC then review the
recommendations of the committees and make their specification
recommendations to NMFS. NMFS reviews those recommendations, and may
modify them if necessary to ensure that they are consistent with the
FMP and other applicable law. NMFS then publishes proposed measures for
public comment. NMFS proposed the specifications set here in the
Federal Register on March 19, 2012 (77 FR 15991), with a 30-day public
comment period. NMFS received six comments, which are addressed below.
A detailed description of how the 2012 spiny dogfish ABC and
associated specification measures were derived, and the range of
alternatives analyzed, are provided in the proposed rule and in its
supplementary materials (see ADDRESSES), and are not repeated here. The
final approved specifications for the 2012 spiny dogfish fishery are
described below.
Final Measures
NMFS is implementing the following specifications for the spiny
dogfish fishery for the 2012 fishing year:
1. The spiny dogfish annual catch limit (ACL) is 44.737 million lb
(20,292 mt);
2. The spiny dogfish commercial quota is 35.694 million lb (16,191
mt); and,
3. The spiny dogfish possession limit remains at 3,000 lb (1,361
kg) per trip.
Based on the percentage allocations specified in the FMP, quota
Period 1 (May 1 through October 31) is allocated 20.667 million lb
(9,374 mt), and quota Period 2 (November 1 through April 30) is
allocated 15.027 million lb (6,816 mt). The significant quota increase
from fishing year 2011 quota, in conjunction with the status quo
possession limit, should help avoid prolonged fishery closures, extend
the fishing season, reduce regulatory discards, and maximize revenues
for vessels that land spiny dogfish.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received six comments to the proposed specifications. These
commenters offered five distinct comments.
Comment 1: Two Massachusetts-based commercial fishing organizations
commented that they support the proposed spiny dogfish commercial quota
and possession limit.
Response: NMFS agrees that the final commercial quota and status
quo possession limit meet the objectives of the Spiny Dogfish FMP and
will maximize landings for the fishery during the 2012 fishing year.
Comment 2: The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
commented that it supports the proposed quota, but recommended that the
possession limit be increased to 4,000 lb (1,815 kg), consistent with
the MAFMC's recommendation.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the spiny dogfish possession limit
should be increased. NMFS considers the 3,000 lb (1,361 kg) possession
limit to be the most appropriate spiny dogfish possession limit for the
2012 fishing year. As noted above, NMFS believes that the status quo
possession limit in conjunction with the increased quota has the
greatest likelihood of prolonging the fishing season, and of preventing
mid-season fishery closures and their associated negative economic
impacts. NMFS expects these specifications will distribute spiny
dogfish landings and revenues across the fishing year, rather than
increasing per-trip revenues under a shorter fishing season. The
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission) has also
implemented this possession limit in state waters for 2012.
Comment 3: One fishing industry commenter argued that the science
used in the spiny dogfish stock assessment and for setting
specifications is flawed. The commenter suggested that spiny dogfish
biomass has been underestimated, and that catch limits for female spiny
dogfish should be between 66 and 75 million lb (30,000-34,000 mt),
while catch limits for male spiny dogfish should be between 70 and 100
million lb (32,000-45,000 mt). The commenter further argued that the
high biomass of male dogfish contributes to predation on spiny dogfish
pups and more valuable groundfish species, and suggested that a male-
only spiny dogfish fishery should be implemented.
Response: National Standard 2 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
that fishery management measures be based upon the best available
scientific information. The final catch limits and specifications being
implemented by this rule represent the best available scientific
information. They are based on the results of peer-reviewed stock
assessments, the recommendations of the SSC, and the goals of the FMP.
A description of how the 2012 spiny dogfish catch limits were
calculated is given in the proposed rule for this action. There is no
scientific justification for specifying the catch limits at the levels
recommended by the commenter, and such high limits would be
inconsistent with the requirements of the FMP. The issue of a male-only
spiny dogfish fishery is beyond the scope of this rule, and would
require an amendment to the FMP. NMFS notes that the MAFMC and NEFMC
are currently developing Amendment 3 to the Spiny Dogfish FMP, but have
removed from the range of alternatives consideration of male-only spiny
dogfish management measures.
Comment 4: One comment submitted by a conservation organization
opposed the proposed spiny dogfish commercial quota, and recommended
that the quota only be increased to 30 million lb (13,608 mt),
consistent with the Commission's initial 2012 quota recommendation. The
commenter cited numerous concerns with the status of the spiny dogfish
stock, including vulnerable life history traits, poor pup production,
projected future declines in spawning stock biomass, declines in the
average size of pups and mature females, skewed sex ratios, and several
sources of uncertainty in the stock assessment. The commenter argued
that the proposed quota represents an unnecessarily high increase that
is not in the best long-term interests of the fishery. Additionally,
the commenter suggested that the MAFMC's risk policy used to calculate
the spiny dogfish ABC (i.e., using the catch level that corresponds to
a 40-percent probability of overfishing) should be more precautionary
given the stock's inherent vulnerability. For comparison, the commenter
noted that the Atlantic
[[Page 30226]]
Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan for coastal sharks
uses a 70-percent probability of success to select management measures,
and there should be less than a 20-percent chance of a management
measure resulting in a stock decline.
Response: NMFS agrees that the commercial quota of 35.694 million
lb (16,191 mt) recommended by both Councils represents a dramatic
increase from earlier quota levels that favors short-term yield over
long-term fishery stability. NMFS also acknowledges that all of the
other listed concerns with spiny dogfish stock status are valid. Most
importantly, spiny dogfish spawning stock biomass is projected to
decline significantly between 2014 and 2020 due to poor pup production.
However, while the proposed quota represents the upper limit of the
range of acceptable quota alternatives, it is not expected to result in
overfishing. If spiny dogfish biomass declines in future years, harvest
levels will have to be appropriately reduced in those years. While a
30-million-lb (13,608-mt) quota may be a more precautionary and
stabilizing recommendation, the quota set here still reflects the best
available scientific information, and is consistent with the
recommendations of the SSC and the requirements of the FMP and
Magnuson-Stevens Act. Therefore, there is no compelling biological or
legal justification to reject the commercial quota recommendation of
both Councils.
Comment 5: One public commenter argued that the spiny dogfish quota
should be reduced by 50 percent, to 10 million lb (4,536 mt). No
justification was provided for this reduction.
Response: NMFS disagrees that such a reduction in spiny dogfish
harvest levels is necessary at this time. Spiny dogfish spawning stock
biomass has been increasing in recent years, and is currently above
target levels. The proposed increase in quota is supported by the best
available scientific information and follows the ABC and specification
process defined in the FMP.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has made a determination that this rule is
consistent with the Spiny Dogfish FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this rule
is not significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
NMFS has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) in
support of this action. The FRFA incorporates the IRFA, a summary of
the significant issues raised by the public comments in response to the
IRFA, NMFS' responses to those comments, relevant analyses contained in
the action and its EA, and a summary of the analyses completed to
support the action in this rule. A copy of the analyses done in the
action and EA are available from the Council (see ADDRESSES). A summary
of the IRFA was published in the proposed rule for this action and is
not repeated here. A description of why this action was considered, the
objectives of, and the legal basis for this rule is contained in the
preamble to the proposed rule and this final rule and is not repeated
here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public in Response to
the IRFA, a Summary of the Agency's Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the Proposed Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
Six comments were received on the proposed rule. For a summary of
the comments, and NMFS's responses to them, see the Comments and
Responses section above. None of the comments raised issues or concerns
related to the IRFA, and no changes were made to the rule as a result
of the comments.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities To Which the Rule
Would Apply
The increase in the spiny dogfish commercial quota would impact
vessels that hold Federal open access commercial spiny dogfish permits,
and participate in the spiny dogfish fishery. According to MAFMC's
analysis, 2,942 vessels were issued spiny dogfish permits in 2010.
However, only 326 vessels landed any amount of spiny dogfish. While the
fishery extends from Maine to North Carolina, most active vessels were
from (in descending order) Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Hampshire,
Rhode Island, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
This action does not introduce any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements. This rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with other Federal rules.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes
The purpose of this action is to increase spiny dogfish catch
limits and landings, consistent with the best available science,
thereby extending the duration of the fishing season and increasing
revenue relative to the status quo. The action is expected to maximize
the short-term profitability for the spiny dogfish fishery during the
2012 fishing year, without jeopardizing the long-term sustainability of
the stock. Therefore, the economic impacts resulting from the action
are expected to be positive, and there were no other alternatives
considered that could have further increased the economic yield from
the fishery while remaining constant with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
the goals of the FMP.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a letter to permit holders that also serves as
small entity compliance guide (the guide) was prepared. Copies of this
final rule are available from the Northeast Regional Office, and the
guide, i.e., permit holder letter, will be sent to all holders of
permits for the spiny dogfish fishery. The guide and this final rule
will be available upon request, and posted on the Northeast Regional
Office's Web site at www.nero.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 16, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-12366 Filed 5-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P