Safety Zone; Marysville Days Fireworks, St. Clair River, Marysville, MI, 29901-29903 [2012-12264]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0007 to
read as follows:
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone that will be enforced for only five
hours. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
16:13 May 18, 2012
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
■
Technical Standards
VerDate Mar<15>2010
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Jkt 226001
§ 165.T07–0007 Safety Zone; International
Special Operations Forces Week Capability
Exercise, Seddon Channel, Tampa, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone. All
waters of Seddon Channel within a 300
yard radius of position 27°56′21″ N,
82°27′23″ W. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824–
7524, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted by
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
a designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29901
(d) Effective Date. This rule will be
enforced from 12:30 p.m. until 3:30 p.m.
on May 22, 2012, and from 12:30 p.m.
until 2:30 p.m. on May 23, 2012.
Dated: May 2, 2012.
S.L. Dickinson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2012–12239 Filed 5–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0388]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Marysville Days
Fireworks, St. Clair River, Marysville,
MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the St. Clair River, Marysville,
Michigan. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the St.
Clair River during the preparation for
and display of the Marysville Days
Fireworks on June 29, 2012.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:00
p.m. through 11:15 p.m. on June 29,
2012.
SUMMARY:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2012–
0388 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2012–0388 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LT Adrian
Palomeque, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9508, email
Adrian.F.Palomeque@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
29902
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because waiting
for a notice and comment period to run
would be impracticable. The final
details for this year’s event were not
received by the Coast Guard with
sufficient time to run a comment period
before the start of this year’s event.
Thus, delaying the effectiveness of this
rule to await the running of a comment
period would inhibit the Coast Guard’s
ability to protect the public from the
hazards associated with maritime
fireworks displays.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable for the
same reasons discussed in the preceding
paragraph.
Background and Purpose
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
On June 29, 2012, fireworks will be
launched from a point on land near the
Marysville Municipal Park, adjacent to
the St. Clair River, to commemorate
Marysville Day. The fireworks display
will occur between 10:00 p.m. and 11:15
p.m., June 29, 2012. The Captain of the
Port Detroit has determined that these
fireworks will pose certain hazards to
the boating public. Such hazards
include obstructions to the waterway
that may cause marine casualties, the
explosive danger of fireworks, and
debris falling into the water that may
cause death, serious bodily harm, or
property damage. Establishing a safety
zone to control vessel movement around
the location of the launch platform will
help ensure the safety of persons and
property in the vicinity of this event and
help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
For the reasons discussed above, the
Captain of the Port Detroit has
determined that a temporary safety zone
is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the setup,
loading, and launching of the Marysville
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 May 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Days Fireworks Display. This safety
zone is effective and will be enforced
from 10:00 p.m. through 11:15 p.m. on
June 29, 2012. The temporary safety
zone will encompass all waters on St.
Clair River within a 600 foot radius of
the fireworks launch site located on
land at position 42°54′25″ N, 082°27′58″
W. All geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated on
scene representative. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his designated on scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated on scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone around the launch platform will be
relatively small and exist for only a
minimal time. Thus, restrictions on
vessel movement within any particular
area of the St. Clair River are expected
to be minimal. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still
transit through the safety zone when
permitted by the Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
this portion of St. Clair River between
10:00 p.m. through 11:15 p.m. on June
29, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the same reasons discussed in the above
Regulatory Planning and Review
section.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 May 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction because it
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165— REGULATED
NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED
ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29903
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0388 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0388 Safety zone; Marysville
Days Fireworks, St. Clair River, Marysville,
MI.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all U.S. waters of the St.
Clair River within a 600 foot radius of
the fireworks launch site located on
land at position 42°54′25″ N, 082°27′58″
W. All geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This safety zone is effective and will be
enforced from 10:00 p.m. through 11:15
p.m. on June 29, 2012.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so.
(5) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port or his
on-scene representative.
Dated: May 7, 2012.
J.E. Ogden,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2012–12264 Filed 5–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29901-29903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12264]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0388]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Marysville Days Fireworks, St. Clair River,
Marysville, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
St. Clair River, Marysville, Michigan. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the St. Clair River during the
preparation for and display of the Marysville Days Fireworks on June
29, 2012.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:00 p.m. through 11:15 p.m. on
June 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2012-0388 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2012-0388 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email LT Adrian Palomeque, Prevention
Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9508,
email Adrian.F.Palomeque@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 29902]]
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because waiting for a notice and comment
period to run would be impracticable. The final details for this year's
event were not received by the Coast Guard with sufficient time to run
a comment period before the start of this year's event. Thus, delaying
the effectiveness of this rule to await the running of a comment period
would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect the public from the
hazards associated with maritime fireworks displays.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable for the same reasons discussed in the
preceding paragraph.
Background and Purpose
On June 29, 2012, fireworks will be launched from a point on land
near the Marysville Municipal Park, adjacent to the St. Clair River, to
commemorate Marysville Day. The fireworks display will occur between
10:00 p.m. and 11:15 p.m., June 29, 2012. The Captain of the Port
Detroit has determined that these fireworks will pose certain hazards
to the boating public. Such hazards include obstructions to the
waterway that may cause marine casualties, the explosive danger of
fireworks, and debris falling into the water that may cause death,
serious bodily harm, or property damage. Establishing a safety zone to
control vessel movement around the location of the launch platform will
help ensure the safety of persons and property in the vicinity of this
event and help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
For the reasons discussed above, the Captain of the Port Detroit
has determined that a temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of spectators and vessels during the setup, loading, and
launching of the Marysville Days Fireworks Display. This safety zone is
effective and will be enforced from 10:00 p.m. through 11:15 p.m. on
June 29, 2012. The temporary safety zone will encompass all waters on
St. Clair River within a 600 foot radius of the fireworks launch site
located on land at position 42[deg]54'25'' N, 082[deg]27'58'' W. All
geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his designated on scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will
not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zone around the
launch platform will be relatively small and exist for only a minimal
time. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within any particular area
of the St. Clair River are expected to be minimal. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by the Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in this portion of St. Clair River between 10:00 p.m.
through 11:15 p.m. on June 29, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the same reasons discussed in
the above Regulatory Planning and Review section.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
[[Page 29903]]
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of
the Instruction because it involves the establishment of a temporary
safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination will be available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165-- REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0388 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0388 Safety zone; Marysville Days Fireworks, St. Clair
River, Marysville, MI.
(a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all U.S. waters of the
St. Clair River within a 600 foot radius of the fireworks launch site
located on land at position 42[deg]54'25'' N, 082[deg]27'58'' W. All
geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. This safety zone is effective
and will be enforced from 10:00 p.m. through 11:15 p.m. on June 29,
2012.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Detroit or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so.
(5) Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port or his on-scene representative.
Dated: May 7, 2012.
J.E. Ogden,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2012-12264 Filed 5-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P