Loan Guarantees for Projects That Employ Innovative Technologies, 29853-29855 [2012-12218]
Download as PDF
29853
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 98
Monday, May 21, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 609
RIN 1901–AB32
Loan Guarantees for Projects That
Employ Innovative Technologies
Loan Programs Office,
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
(DOE) is publishing this technical
amendment to the regulations for the
loan guarantee program authorized by
Section 1703 of Title XVII of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005 (Title XVII) to
incorporate, without substantive
change, an amendment to Section
1702(b) of Title XVII enacted by Section
305 of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2012.
DATES: This rule is effective May 21,
2012.
SUMMARY:
Mr.
David G. Frantz, Acting Executive
Director, Loan Programs Office, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–8336. Email:
david.frantz@hq.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background
Section 305 of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012 amended
Section 1702(b) of Title XVII by striking
the existing subsection (b) and inserting
instead a provision that makes clear no
guarantee shall be made unless an
appropriation for the cost of the
guarantee has been made; the Secretary
has received from the borrower a
payment in full for the cost of the
guarantee and deposited the payment
into the Treasury; or a combination of
one or more appropriations and one or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 May 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
more payments from the borrower has
been made that is sufficient to cover the
cost of the guarantee.
II. Summary of Today’s Action
Today’s action is a technical
amendment to revise the regulations for
the loan guarantee program authorized
by Section 1703 of Title XVII to
incorporate, without substantive
change, the amendment to Section
1702(b) of Title XVII referred to above.
Pursuant to authority at 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the DOE finds good cause to
waive the requirement for prior notice
and an opportunity for public comment
on this rulemaking because such
procedures would be unnecessary. As
DOE is merely inserting into the Code
of Federal Regulations statutory
provisions already applicable to these
loan guarantees and removing language
inconsistent with those statutory
provisions prior notice and an
opportunity for public comment would
serve no useful purpose. For the same
reason, DOE finds good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day
delay in effective date and make this
rule effective immediately.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review’’
Today’s final rule is a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review.’’ 58 FR 51735
(October 4, 1993). Accordingly, today’s
action was subject to review by the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that by law must
be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As required by
Executive Order 13272, Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking, 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. The
Department has made its procedures
and policies available on the Office of
General Counsel’s Web site: https://
www.gc.doe.gov. DOE today is revising
the Code of Federal Regulations to
incorporate, without substantive
change, an amendment to Section
1702(b) of Title XVII. Because this is a
technical amendment for which a
general notice of proposed rulemaking
is not required, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply to this
rulemaking.
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking imposes no new
information or record keeping
requirements. Accordingly, Office of
Management and Budget clearance is
not required under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DOE has determined that this rule is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion
found in DOE’s National Environmental
Policy Act regulations at paragraph A.6
of Appendix A to Subpart D, 10 CFR
part 1021, which applies to rulemakings
that are strictly procedural.
Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132,
‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism.’’
64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on Federal
agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt
State law or that have Federalism
implications. The Executive Order
requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The
Executive Order also requires agencies
to have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have Federalism implications. On
March 14, 2000, DOE published a
statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
29854
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
it will follow in the development of
such regulations. 65 FR 13735. EPCA
governs and prescribes Federal
preemption of State regulations as to
energy conservation for the products
that are the subject of today’s proposed
rule. States can petition DOE for
exemption from such preemption to the
extent, and based on criteria, set forth in
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297) No further
action is required by Executive Order
13132.
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988,
‘‘Civil Justice Reform’’
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and
(3) provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard and promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable
standards in section 3(a) and section
3(b) to determine whether they are met
or it is unreasonable to meet one or
more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to
the extent permitted by law, this final
rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4) requires each Federal agency to
assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and Tribal
governments and the private sector. For
a proposed regulatory action likely to
result in a rule that may cause the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 May 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
in any one year (adjusted annually for
inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires
a Federal agency to publish a written
statement that estimates the resulting
costs, benefits, and other effects on the
national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b))
The UMRA also requires a Federal
agency to develop an effective process
to permit timely input by elected
officers of State, local, and Tribal
governments on a proposed ‘‘significant
intergovernmental mandate,’’ and
requires an agency plan for giving notice
and opportunity for timely input to
potentially affected small governments
before establishing any requirements
that might significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. On March 18,
1997, DOE published a statement of
policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under
UMRA (62 FR 12820) (also available at
https://www.gc.doe.gov). This final rule
contains neither an intergovernmental
mandate nor a mandate that may result
in the expenditure of $100 million or
more in any year, so these requirements
under the UMRA do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being. This
final rule would not have any impact on
the autonomy or integrity of the family
as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to
prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630,
‘‘Governmental Actions and
Interference With Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights’’
The Department has determined,
under Executive Order 12630,
‘‘Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights,’’ 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988),
that this rule would not result in any
takings which might require
compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the United States
Constitution.
J. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note)
provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the
public under guidelines established by
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s rulemaking under the
OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA), Office of Management and
Budget, a Statement of Energy Effects for
any proposed significant energy action.
A ‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined
as any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy, or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This final rule would not have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy and,
therefore, is not a significant energy
action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
report to Congress on the promulgation
of this rule prior to its effective date.
The report will state that it has been
determined that the rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
IV. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of today’s final rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 609
Administrative practice and
procedure, Energy, Loan programs, and
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 15,
2012.
David G. Frantz,
Acting Executive Director, Loan Programs
Office.
§ 609.10
Loan Guarantee Agreement.
*
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, DOE hereby amends Part 609
of chapter II of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 609—LOAN GUARANTEES FOR
PROJECTS THAT EMPLOY
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
1. The authority citation for part 609
continues to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(17) If Borrower is to make payment
in full or in part for the Credit Subsidy
Cost of the loan guarantee pursuant to
section 1702(b)(2) of the Act, such
payment must be received by DOE prior
to, or at the time of, closing;
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–12218 Filed 5–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7254, 16511–16514.
Federal Aviation Administration
2. In § 609.8 revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
14 CFR Part 39
§ 609.8 Term sheets and conditional
commitments.
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0184; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–118–AD; Amendment
39–17055; AD 2012–10–06]
*
RIN 2120–AA64
■
*
*
*
*
(d) DOE’s obligations under each
Conditional Commitment are
conditional upon statutory authority
having been provided in advance of the
execution of the Loan Guarantee
Agreement sufficient under FCRA and
Title XVII for DOE to execute the Loan
Guarantee Agreement, and payment in
full of the Credit Subsidy Cost for the
loan guarantee that is the subject of the
Conditional Commitment from one of
the following:
(1) A Congressional appropriation of
funds;
(2) A payment from the Borrower
deposited into the Treasury; or
(3) A combination of one or more
appropriations under paragraph (d)(1)
and one or more payments from the
Borrower under paragraph (d)(2) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 609.9 revise paragraph (d)(1) to
read as follows:
§ 609.9 Closing on the Loan Guarantee
Agreement.
ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Pursuant to section 1702(b) of the
Act, DOE has received payment in full
of the Credit Subsidy Cost of the loan
guarantee from one of the following:
(i) A Congressional appropriation of
funds;
(ii) A payment from the Borrower
deposited into the Treasury; or
(iii) A combination of one or more
appropriations under paragraph (d)(1)(i)
and one or more payments from the
Borrower under paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 609.10 revise paragraph (d)(17)
to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 May 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB,
Saab Aerosystems Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all Saab
AB, Saab Aerosystems Model SAAB
2000 airplanes. This AD was prompted
by reports that environmentally friendly
de-icing agents used on certain
electrical connectors and braids could
cause corrosion damage. This AD
requires performing, in certain
locations, a detailed inspection for
corrosion of the electrical and
electronics installation, and if corrosion
is found repairing each affected harness
braid or replacing each affected
component and/or wiring harness. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
corrosion of critical system wiring,
which could result in arcing and, in
combination with other factors, a fire
and consequent damage to the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
25, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of June 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29855
Engineer, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1112; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on February 28, 2012 (77 FR
11791). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Environmentally friendly de-/anti-icing
agents (acetates or formats) are a known
cause of corrosion damage to components of
the Electrical Wiring Interconnection System
(EWIS) on aeroplanes.
Investigations by SAAB have identified
certain electrical connectors and braids
which are susceptible to such damage, in
zones 191 and 192 of the center wing
fuselage and in zones 323, 332 and 342,
affecting the wiring harnesses of elevator and
rudder servos.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to damage of critical
system wiring, possibly resulting in arcing
and, in combination with other factors, a fire
and consequent damage to, or loss of, the
aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition, SAAB
have issued Service Bulletin (SB) 2000–92–
005 and SB 2000–92–006 to provide
instructions to detect unacceptable corrosion
on electrical and electronic installation
wiring.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires a one-time [detailed]
inspection of the affected components in the
designated area, the reporting of all
inspections results to SAAB and, depending
on findings, appropriate corrective action
[repair or replacement].
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (77
FR 11791, February 28, 2012) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
10 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 360
work-hours per product to comply with
the basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29853-29855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12218]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Rules and
Regulations
[[Page 29853]]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 609
RIN 1901-AB32
Loan Guarantees for Projects That Employ Innovative Technologies
AGENCY: Loan Programs Office, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is publishing this technical
amendment to the regulations for the loan guarantee program authorized
by Section 1703 of Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Title
XVII) to incorporate, without substantive change, an amendment to
Section 1702(b) of Title XVII enacted by Section 305 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012.
DATES: This rule is effective May 21, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David G. Frantz, Acting Executive
Director, Loan Programs Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202)
586-8336. Email: david.frantz@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 305 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 amended
Section 1702(b) of Title XVII by striking the existing subsection (b)
and inserting instead a provision that makes clear no guarantee shall
be made unless an appropriation for the cost of the guarantee has been
made; the Secretary has received from the borrower a payment in full
for the cost of the guarantee and deposited the payment into the
Treasury; or a combination of one or more appropriations and one or
more payments from the borrower has been made that is sufficient to
cover the cost of the guarantee.
II. Summary of Today's Action
Today's action is a technical amendment to revise the regulations
for the loan guarantee program authorized by Section 1703 of Title XVII
to incorporate, without substantive change, the amendment to Section
1702(b) of Title XVII referred to above.
Pursuant to authority at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the DOE finds good
cause to waive the requirement for prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment on this rulemaking because such procedures would be
unnecessary. As DOE is merely inserting into the Code of Federal
Regulations statutory provisions already applicable to these loan
guarantees and removing language inconsistent with those statutory
provisions prior notice and an opportunity for public comment would
serve no useful purpose. For the same reason, DOE finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay in effective date
and make this rule effective immediately.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and
Review''
Today's final rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and
Review.'' 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993). Accordingly, today's action
was subject to review by the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by Executive Order 13272, Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking, 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the
potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. The Department
has made its procedures and policies available on the Office of General
Counsel's Web site: https://www.gc.doe.gov. DOE today is revising the
Code of Federal Regulations to incorporate, without substantive change,
an amendment to Section 1702(b) of Title XVII. Because this is a
technical amendment for which a general notice of proposed rulemaking
is not required, the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this
rulemaking.
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking imposes no new information or record keeping
requirements. Accordingly, Office of Management and Budget clearance is
not required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.)
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DOE has determined that this rule is covered under the Categorical
Exclusion found in DOE's National Environmental Policy Act regulations
at paragraph A.6 of Appendix A to Subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021, which
applies to rulemakings that are strictly procedural. Accordingly,
neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact
statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism.'' 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on Federal agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have Federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any
action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and
to carefully assess the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an accountable process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have Federalism implications.
On March 14, 2000, DOE published a statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process
[[Page 29854]]
it will follow in the development of such regulations. 65 FR 13735.
EPCA governs and prescribes Federal preemption of State regulations as
to energy conservation for the products that are the subject of today's
proposed rule. States can petition DOE for exemption from such
preemption to the extent, and based on criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6297) No further action is required by Executive Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform''
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
Federal agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard and
promote simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive
Order 12988 specifically requires that Executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard
for affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden
reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting
clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the
Attorney General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
Executive agencies to review regulations in light of applicable
standards in section 3(a) and section 3(b) to determine whether they
are met or it is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has
completed the required review and determined that, to the extent
permitted by law, this final rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub.
L. 104-4) requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. For a proposed regulatory action likely to result in a
rule that may cause the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million
or more in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation), section 202
of UMRA requires a Federal agency to publish a written statement that
estimates the resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the
national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a
Federal agency to develop an effective process to permit timely input
by elected officers of State, local, and Tribal governments on a
proposed ``significant intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an
agency plan for giving notice and opportunity for timely input to
potentially affected small governments before establishing any
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. On March 18, 1997, DOE published a statement of policy on
its process for intergovernmental consultation under UMRA (62 FR 12820)
(also available at https://www.gc.doe.gov). This final rule contains
neither an intergovernmental mandate nor a mandate that may result in
the expenditure of $100 million or more in any year, so these
requirements under the UMRA do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This final rule would not have any impact on the autonomy or integrity
of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental Actions and
Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property Rights''
The Department has determined, under Executive Order 12630,
``Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights,'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this rule would
not result in any takings which might require compensation under the
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note) provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002),
and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002).
DOE has reviewed today's rulemaking under the OMB and DOE guidelines
and has concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in
those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use''
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of
Management and Budget, a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed
significant energy action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined
as any action by an agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action. For any proposed
significant energy action, the agency must give a detailed statement of
any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use should the
proposal be implemented, and of reasonable alternatives to the action
and their expected benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
This final rule would not have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy and, therefore, is not a
significant energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress on the
promulgation of this rule prior to its effective date. The report will
state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of today's final
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 609
Administrative practice and procedure, Energy, Loan programs, and
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 29855]]
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2012.
David G. Frantz,
Acting Executive Director, Loan Programs Office.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, DOE hereby amends Part
609 of chapter II of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set
forth below:
PART 609--LOAN GUARANTEES FOR PROJECTS THAT EMPLOY INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 609 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7254, 16511-16514.
0
2. In Sec. 609.8 revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 609.8 Term sheets and conditional commitments.
* * * * *
(d) DOE's obligations under each Conditional Commitment are
conditional upon statutory authority having been provided in advance of
the execution of the Loan Guarantee Agreement sufficient under FCRA and
Title XVII for DOE to execute the Loan Guarantee Agreement, and payment
in full of the Credit Subsidy Cost for the loan guarantee that is the
subject of the Conditional Commitment from one of the following:
(1) A Congressional appropriation of funds;
(2) A payment from the Borrower deposited into the Treasury; or
(3) A combination of one or more appropriations under paragraph
(d)(1) and one or more payments from the Borrower under paragraph
(d)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 609.9 revise paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 609.9 Closing on the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Pursuant to section 1702(b) of the Act, DOE has received
payment in full of the Credit Subsidy Cost of the loan guarantee from
one of the following:
(i) A Congressional appropriation of funds;
(ii) A payment from the Borrower deposited into the Treasury; or
(iii) A combination of one or more appropriations under paragraph
(d)(1)(i) and one or more payments from the Borrower under paragraph
(d)(1)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 609.10 revise paragraph (d)(17) to read as follows:
Sec. 609.10 Loan Guarantee Agreement.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(17) If Borrower is to make payment in full or in part for the
Credit Subsidy Cost of the loan guarantee pursuant to section
1702(b)(2) of the Act, such payment must be received by DOE prior to,
or at the time of, closing;
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-12218 Filed 5-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P