Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned and Other Used Automobile Parts Industry, Request for Comments, 29922-29924 [2012-12132]
Download as PDF
29922
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
amend controlled airspace at Kerrville
Municipal Airport/Louis Schreiner
Field, Kerrville, TX.
Environmental Review
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9V,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 9, 2011, and
effective September 15, 2011, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW TX E5 Kerrville, TX [Amended]
Kerrville Municipal Airport/Louis Schreiner
Field, TX
(Lat. 29°58′36″ N., long. 99°05′08″ W.)
Shein LOM/NDB
(Lat. 29°54′54″ N., long. 99°00′29″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.6-mile
radius of Kerrville Municipal Airport/Louis
Schreiner Field, and within 2 miles each side
of the 310° bearing from the airport extending
from the 7.6-mile radius to 12.3 miles
northwest of the airport, and within 2.2 miles
each side of the 131° bearing from the Shein
LOM/NDB extending from the 7.6-mile
radius to 11.6 miles southeast of the airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 10, 2012.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Acting Manager, Operations
Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012–12161 Filed 5–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 20
Federal Trade Commission
(FTC or Commission).
ACTION: Request for public comments.
As part of the Commission’s
systematic review of all current FTC
rules and guides, the Commission
requests public comment on the costs,
benefits, necessity for, and regulatory
and economic impact of the FTC’s
‘‘Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned
and Other Used Automobile Parts
Industry.’’
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 3, 2012.
SUMMARY:
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
Jkt 226001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
AGENCY:
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
17:07 May 18, 2012
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned
and Other Used Automobile Parts
Industry, Request for Comments
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Used Auto Parts Guides
Review, 16 CFR Part 20, Project No.
P127702’’ on your comment, and file
your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
usedautopartsguide, by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex B), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan L. Kessler, Attorney, East
Central Region, Federal Trade
Commission, 1111 Superior Avenue,
Suite 200, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, 216–
263–3436.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
The Used Auto Parts Guides seek to
prevent unfair or deceptive acts or
practices in the advertisement and sale
(including installation) of previously
used motor vehicle parts and assemblies
of parts containing previously used
parts (e.g., engines and transmissions).
The Commission first addressed the
used automobile parts market in 1962,
when it issued its Trade Practice Rules
for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned and
Other Used Automotive Parts Industry.
In 1979 these rules were rescinded and
replaced with the ‘‘Guides for the
Rebuilt, Reconditioned and Other Used
Automobile Parts Industry’’ (Used Auto
Parts Guides or Guides). The Guides
have been in place since that time, but
were revised in 2002 to make minor
language changes and to update the list
of commonly rebuilt or reused parts and
assemblies.
In their current form, the Guides
apply to ‘‘used parts and assemblies
containing used parts designed for use
in automobiles, trucks, motorcycles,
tractors, or similar self-propelled
vehicles whether or not such parts or
assemblies have been reconstructed in
any way’’ (Industry Product or
Products). 16 CFR part 20. The Guides
prohibit both misrepresentations that an
Industry Product is new and
misrepresentations of ‘‘the current
condition, or extent of previous use,
reconstruction, or repair of’’ an Industry
Product. 16 CFR 20.1(a). Industry
Products must be clearly and
conspicuously identified as such in
advertisements, on packaging, and, if
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules
the product appears new, on the
product itself. Further, the Guides
prohibit misrepresenting the identity of
an Industry Product rebuilder. 16 CFR
20.2. The Guides describe the treatment
an Industry Product must receive before
it can be described as ‘‘rebuilt’’ or
‘‘remanufactured,’’ and limit use of the
term ‘‘factory rebuilt’’ to Industry
Products rebuilt ‘‘at a factory generally
engaged in the rebuilding of such
products.’’ 16 CFR 20.3.
The Used Auto Parts Guides, like
other industry guides issued by the
Commission, are ‘‘administrative
interpretations of laws administered by
the Commission for the guidance of the
public in conducting its affairs in
conformity with legal requirements.’’ 16
CFR 1.5. Conduct inconsistent with the
Guides ‘‘may result in corrective action
by the Commission under applicable
statutory provisions.’’ 16 CFR 1.5.
II. Regulatory Review Program
The Commission reviews all of its
rules and guides periodically. These
reviews seek information about the
costs, benefits, and regulatory and
economic impact of each rule and guide.
The information obtained assists the
Commission in identifying rules and
guides that should be changed or
eliminated. Accordingly, this Notice
requests comments addressing whether
the Used Auto Parts Guides are still
needed, their costs and benefits to
consumers and businesses, and whether
any changes are needed.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Request for Comments
Please provide any comments you
have related to the Used Auto Parts
Guides. Particularly helpful would be
comments that respond to all or some of
the following questions:
1. Are the Guides still needed? Why
or why not?
2. What benefits do the Guides
provide to consumers? What evidence
do you have or know of that shows
these benefits?
3. What changes, if any, should the
Commission make to the Guides to
increase their benefits to consumers?
a. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
businesses, particularly small
businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or
know of that supports these changes?
4. What costs have the Guides
imposed on consumers? What evidence
do you have or know of that shows
these costs?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
5. What changes, if any, would reduce
the costs the Guides impose on
consumers?
a. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
businesses, particularly small
businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or
know of that supports these changes?
6. What benefits, if any, have the
Guides provided to businesses, and in
particular to small businesses? What
evidence do you have or know of that
supports these benefits?
7. What changes, if any, should be
made to the Guides to increase their
benefits to businesses, particularly small
businesses?
a. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
businesses, particularly small
businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or
know of that supports these changes?
8. What costs, including costs of
compliance, have the Guides imposed
on businesses, especially small
businesses? What evidence do you have
or know of that supports these costs?
9. What changes, if any, should be
made to the Guides to reduce the costs
imposed on businesses, particularly
small businesses?
a. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
businesses, particularly small
businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or
know of that supports these changes?
10. What evidence, if any, has become
available since 2002 concerning
consumer perceptions of Industry
Products (used vehicle parts and
assemblies of parts, such as engines and
transmissions, containing used parts)?
Does this new information indicate that
the Guides should be modified? If so,
why does the information indicate the
Guides should be modified, and how
should they be modified?
11. The Guides now require that
certain disclosures be clear and
conspicuous. Should the Guides define
‘‘clear and conspicuous’’? Why or why
not? What information should be in a
definition of ‘‘clear and conspicuous’’?
(For example, other Commission rules
define ‘‘clear and conspicuous’’ as
‘‘reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29923
and significance of the information.’’ 16
CFR 313.3 (Privacy of Consumer
Financial Information), 16 CFR 680.3
(Affiliate Marketing)).
12. Should the Guides be changed to
specify when an installer of an Industry
Product (e.g., mechanic or technician)
must disclose the use of the Product to
a consumer? If so:
a. What evidence, if any, do you have
that shows that disclosure of the
installation of an Industry Product is not
being made to consumers at an
appropriate time?
b. When should the installer disclose
the use of an Industry Product? (E.g.,
when the vehicle is left for servicing;
when the consumer is told that a
replacement part is needed; when the
consumer retrieves the vehicle after the
Industry Product has been installed.)
13. How have the Guides affected the
flow of truthful information to
consumers? How have the Guides
affected the flow of deceptive
information to consumers? What
evidence do you have or know of that
shows the effect of the Guides on the
flow of either truthful or deceptive
information to consumers?
14. What evidence is available
concerning the degree of compliance
with the Guides? What does this
evidence indicate about whether the
Guides should be kept, changed, or
eliminated?
15. Are any parts of the Guides no
longer needed? If so, which parts? What
evidence do you have or know of that
supports your views?
16. What changes, if any, should be
made to the Guides to account for
changes in technology or economic
conditions?
a. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the
costs and benefits of the Guides for
businesses, particularly small
businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or
know of that supports these changes?
17. What acts or practices related to
Industry Products do the Guides
currently not address, but which they
should address? What evidence do you
have or know of that supports your
views?
18. Is there a need for efforts to
educate consumers or businesses about
the Used Auto Parts Guides? If so, what
types of educational activities should
the Commission undertake?
19. The current Guides expressly
exclude tires because when the Guides
were last amended the Commission had
separate guides relating to the
advertising and selling of tires. These
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
29924
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules
tire guides have since been eliminated.
Should the Used Auto Parts Guides be
changed to include tires? Why or why
not? What evidence do you have or
know of that supports your views?
20. The current Guides state that they
apply to Industry Products ‘‘designed
for use in automobiles, trucks,
motorcycles, tractors, or similar selfpropelled vehicles.’’ 16 CFR 20.0. Is this
list adequate to describe the vehicles to
which the Guides should apply, or
should other vehicles be expressly
mentioned? (E.g., all-terrain vehicles,
off-road construction vehicles, dune
buggies or other off-road recreation
vehicles.) If so, which other vehicles
should be mentioned, and why? What
evidence do you have or know of that
supports your views?
21. Do the Used Auto Parts Guides
overlap or conflict with other laws or
regulations, whether federal, state, or
local? If so, how?
a. What evidence do you have or
know of concerning the conflicts?
b. Should the Guides be changed
because of these conflicts? If so, how?
c. Have the Guides helped make the
advertising and selling of Industry
Products more consistent across the
country? If so, how?
22. Are there foreign or international
laws, regulations, or standards
concerning the advertising and sale of
Industry Products that the Commission
should consider as it reviews the
Guides? If so, what are they?
a. Should the Guides be changed to
harmonize with these foreign or
international laws, regulations, or
standards? Why or why not?
b. How would harmonization affect
the costs and benefits of the Guides for
consumers?
c. How would harmonization affect
the costs and benefits of the Guides for
businesses, particularly small
businesses?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Instructions for Comment
Submissions
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before August 3, 2012. Write ‘‘Used
Auto Parts Guides Review, 16 CFR Part
20, Matter No. P12–7702’’ on your
comment. Your comment B including
your name and your state B will be
placed on the public record of this
proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the public Commission
Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals’ home contact
information from comments before
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 May 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
placing them on the Commission Web
site.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, such as a Social Security
number, date of birth, driver’s license
number or other state identification
number or foreign country equivalent,
passport number, financial account
number, or credit or debit card number.
You are also solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is obtained
from any person and which is privileged
or confidential,’’ as provided in Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2).
In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you have to follow the procedure
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c). 16 CFR
4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
usedautopartsguide, by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Used Auto Parts Guides Review,
16 CFR Part 20, Matter No. P127702’’ on
your comment and on the envelope, and
mail or deliver it to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H–113
(Annex B), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
1 In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must
include the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record. See
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before August 3, 2012. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 20
Advertising, Motor vehicles, Trade
Practices.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 41–58.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–12132 Filed 5–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0181]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Alabama River, AL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the Meridian and Bigbee
Railroad (MNBR) swing span bridge
across the Alabama River at Selma,
Dallas County, Alabama. Due to the
infrequent requirement to open the
bridge for the passage of vessels, the
owner has requested a change allowing
the bridge to open only on signal if at
least 24-hours advanced notification is
given.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0181 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29922-29924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12132]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 20
Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned and Other Used Automobile
Parts Industry, Request for Comments
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission).
ACTION: Request for public comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of the Commission's systematic review of all current
FTC rules and guides, the Commission requests public comment on the
costs, benefits, necessity for, and regulatory and economic impact of
the FTC's ``Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned and Other Used
Automobile Parts Industry.''
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Used Auto Parts Guides
Review, 16 CFR Part 20, Project No. P127702'' on your comment, and file
your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/usedautopartsguide, by following the instructions on the web-based
form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail or deliver your
comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of
the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex B), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan L. Kessler, Attorney, East
Central Region, Federal Trade Commission, 1111 Superior Avenue, Suite
200, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, 216-263-3436.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Used Auto Parts Guides seek to prevent unfair or deceptive acts
or practices in the advertisement and sale (including installation) of
previously used motor vehicle parts and assemblies of parts containing
previously used parts (e.g., engines and transmissions). The Commission
first addressed the used automobile parts market in 1962, when it
issued its Trade Practice Rules for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned and
Other Used Automotive Parts Industry. In 1979 these rules were
rescinded and replaced with the ``Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned
and Other Used Automobile Parts Industry'' (Used Auto Parts Guides or
Guides). The Guides have been in place since that time, but were
revised in 2002 to make minor language changes and to update the list
of commonly rebuilt or reused parts and assemblies.
In their current form, the Guides apply to ``used parts and
assemblies containing used parts designed for use in automobiles,
trucks, motorcycles, tractors, or similar self-propelled vehicles
whether or not such parts or assemblies have been reconstructed in any
way'' (Industry Product or Products). 16 CFR part 20. The Guides
prohibit both misrepresentations that an Industry Product is new and
misrepresentations of ``the current condition, or extent of previous
use, reconstruction, or repair of'' an Industry Product. 16 CFR
20.1(a). Industry Products must be clearly and conspicuously identified
as such in advertisements, on packaging, and, if
[[Page 29923]]
the product appears new, on the product itself. Further, the Guides
prohibit misrepresenting the identity of an Industry Product rebuilder.
16 CFR 20.2. The Guides describe the treatment an Industry Product must
receive before it can be described as ``rebuilt'' or
``remanufactured,'' and limit use of the term ``factory rebuilt'' to
Industry Products rebuilt ``at a factory generally engaged in the
rebuilding of such products.'' 16 CFR 20.3.
The Used Auto Parts Guides, like other industry guides issued by
the Commission, are ``administrative interpretations of laws
administered by the Commission for the guidance of the public in
conducting its affairs in conformity with legal requirements.'' 16 CFR
1.5. Conduct inconsistent with the Guides ``may result in corrective
action by the Commission under applicable statutory provisions.'' 16
CFR 1.5.
II. Regulatory Review Program
The Commission reviews all of its rules and guides periodically.
These reviews seek information about the costs, benefits, and
regulatory and economic impact of each rule and guide. The information
obtained assists the Commission in identifying rules and guides that
should be changed or eliminated. Accordingly, this Notice requests
comments addressing whether the Used Auto Parts Guides are still
needed, their costs and benefits to consumers and businesses, and
whether any changes are needed.
III. Request for Comments
Please provide any comments you have related to the Used Auto Parts
Guides. Particularly helpful would be comments that respond to all or
some of the following questions:
1. Are the Guides still needed? Why or why not?
2. What benefits do the Guides provide to consumers? What evidence
do you have or know of that shows these benefits?
3. What changes, if any, should the Commission make to the Guides
to increase their benefits to consumers?
a. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for businesses, particularly small businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or know of that supports these
changes?
4. What costs have the Guides imposed on consumers? What evidence
do you have or know of that shows these costs?
5. What changes, if any, would reduce the costs the Guides impose
on consumers?
a. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for businesses, particularly small businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or know of that supports these
changes?
6. What benefits, if any, have the Guides provided to businesses,
and in particular to small businesses? What evidence do you have or
know of that supports these benefits?
7. What changes, if any, should be made to the Guides to increase
their benefits to businesses, particularly small businesses?
a. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for businesses, particularly small businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or know of that supports these
changes?
8. What costs, including costs of compliance, have the Guides
imposed on businesses, especially small businesses? What evidence do
you have or know of that supports these costs?
9. What changes, if any, should be made to the Guides to reduce the
costs imposed on businesses, particularly small businesses?
a. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for businesses, particularly small businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or know of that supports these
changes?
10. What evidence, if any, has become available since 2002
concerning consumer perceptions of Industry Products (used vehicle
parts and assemblies of parts, such as engines and transmissions,
containing used parts)? Does this new information indicate that the
Guides should be modified? If so, why does the information indicate the
Guides should be modified, and how should they be modified?
11. The Guides now require that certain disclosures be clear and
conspicuous. Should the Guides define ``clear and conspicuous''? Why or
why not? What information should be in a definition of ``clear and
conspicuous''? (For example, other Commission rules define ``clear and
conspicuous'' as ``reasonably understandable and designed to call
attention to the nature and significance of the information.'' 16 CFR
313.3 (Privacy of Consumer Financial Information), 16 CFR 680.3
(Affiliate Marketing)).
12. Should the Guides be changed to specify when an installer of an
Industry Product (e.g., mechanic or technician) must disclose the use
of the Product to a consumer? If so:
a. What evidence, if any, do you have that shows that disclosure of
the installation of an Industry Product is not being made to consumers
at an appropriate time?
b. When should the installer disclose the use of an Industry
Product? (E.g., when the vehicle is left for servicing; when the
consumer is told that a replacement part is needed; when the consumer
retrieves the vehicle after the Industry Product has been installed.)
13. How have the Guides affected the flow of truthful information
to consumers? How have the Guides affected the flow of deceptive
information to consumers? What evidence do you have or know of that
shows the effect of the Guides on the flow of either truthful or
deceptive information to consumers?
14. What evidence is available concerning the degree of compliance
with the Guides? What does this evidence indicate about whether the
Guides should be kept, changed, or eliminated?
15. Are any parts of the Guides no longer needed? If so, which
parts? What evidence do you have or know of that supports your views?
16. What changes, if any, should be made to the Guides to account
for changes in technology or economic conditions?
a. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for consumers?
b. How would the changes affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for businesses, particularly small businesses?
c. What evidence do you have or know of that supports these
changes?
17. What acts or practices related to Industry Products do the
Guides currently not address, but which they should address? What
evidence do you have or know of that supports your views?
18. Is there a need for efforts to educate consumers or businesses
about the Used Auto Parts Guides? If so, what types of educational
activities should the Commission undertake?
19. The current Guides expressly exclude tires because when the
Guides were last amended the Commission had separate guides relating to
the advertising and selling of tires. These
[[Page 29924]]
tire guides have since been eliminated. Should the Used Auto Parts
Guides be changed to include tires? Why or why not? What evidence do
you have or know of that supports your views?
20. The current Guides state that they apply to Industry Products
``designed for use in automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, tractors, or
similar self-propelled vehicles.'' 16 CFR 20.0. Is this list adequate
to describe the vehicles to which the Guides should apply, or should
other vehicles be expressly mentioned? (E.g., all-terrain vehicles,
off-road construction vehicles, dune buggies or other off-road
recreation vehicles.) If so, which other vehicles should be mentioned,
and why? What evidence do you have or know of that supports your views?
21. Do the Used Auto Parts Guides overlap or conflict with other
laws or regulations, whether federal, state, or local? If so, how?
a. What evidence do you have or know of concerning the conflicts?
b. Should the Guides be changed because of these conflicts? If so,
how?
c. Have the Guides helped make the advertising and selling of
Industry Products more consistent across the country? If so, how?
22. Are there foreign or international laws, regulations, or
standards concerning the advertising and sale of Industry Products that
the Commission should consider as it reviews the Guides? If so, what
are they?
a. Should the Guides be changed to harmonize with these foreign or
international laws, regulations, or standards? Why or why not?
b. How would harmonization affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for consumers?
c. How would harmonization affect the costs and benefits of the
Guides for businesses, particularly small businesses?
IV. Instructions for Comment Submissions
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before August 3, 2012.
Write ``Used Auto Parts Guides Review, 16 CFR Part 20, Matter No. P12-
7702'' on your comment. Your comment B including your name and your
state B will be placed on the public record of this proceeding,
including, to the extent practicable, on the public Commission Web
site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission tries to remove individuals' home contact
information from comments before placing them on the Commission Web
site.
Because your comment will be made public, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive personal information, such as a Social Security number, date
of birth, driver's license number or other state identification number
or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial account
number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or other individually identifiable
health information. In addition, do not include any ``[t]rade secret or
any commercial or financial information which is obtained from any
person and which is privileged or confidential,'' as provided in
Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2),
16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively
sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories,
formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained
in FTC Rule 4.9(c). 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\ Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and
legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions
of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule
4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/usedautopartsguide, by following the instructions on the web-based
form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you
also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper, write ``Used Auto Parts Guides
Review, 16 CFR Part 20, Matter No. P127702'' on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail or deliver it to the following address: Federal
Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex B), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your
paper comment to the Commission by courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that
it receives on or before August 3, 2012. You can find more information,
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the
Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 20
Advertising, Motor vehicles, Trade Practices.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 41-58.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-12132 Filed 5-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P