National Flood Insurance Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, 28891-28893 [2012-11841]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Notices
Name of Committee: Digestive, Kidney and
Urological Systems Integrated Review Group;
Gastrointestinal Mucosal Pathobiology Study
Section.
Date: June 11, 2012.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Fairmont Hotel San Francisco, 950
Mason Street, San Francisco, CA 94108.
Contact Person: Peter J Perrin, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2180,
MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
0682, perrinp@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic
Translational Integrated Review Group;
Tumor Microenvironment Study Section.
Date: June 11–12, 2012.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Hotel Nikko San Francisco, 222
Mason Street, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Contact Person: Angela Y Ng, Ph.D., MBA,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6200,
MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1715, ngan@mail.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and
Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review
Group; Diseases and Pathophysiology of the
Visual System Study Section.
Date: June 11–12, 2012.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Hotel Nikko San Francisco, 222
Mason Street, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Contact Person: Jerry L Taylor, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5202,
MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1175, taylorje@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Infectious Diseases
and Microbiology Integrated Review Group;
Clinical Research and Field Studies of
Infectious Diseases Study Section.
Date: June 11, 2012.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Hilton Washington, DC/Rockville
Hotel, and Executive Meeting Center (Hilton
Rockville), 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Contact Person: Soheyla Saadi, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3211,
MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
0903, saadisoh@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Oncology 2—
Translational Clinical Integrated Review
Group; Developmental Therapeutics Study
Section.
Date: June 11–12, 2012.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: The Westin National Harbor, 171
Waterfront Street, National Harbor, MD
20745.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:41 May 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
Contact Person: Sharon K Gubanich, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6214,
MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408–
9512, gubanics@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Digestive, Kidney and
Urological Systems Integrated Review Group;
Hepatobiliary Pathophysiology Study
Section.
Date: June 11–12, 2012.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Fairmont Hotel San Francisco, 950
Mason Street, San Francisco, CA 94108.
Contact Person: Bonnie L Burgess-Beusse,
PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2182,
MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1783, beusseb@mail.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Vascular and
Hematology Integrated Review Group;
Vascular Cell and Molecular Biology Study
Section.
Date: June 11–12, 2012.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas
Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Contact Person: Larry Pinkus, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4132,
MSC 7802, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1214, pinkusl@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Population Sciences
and Epidemiology Integrated Review Group;
Infectious Diseases, Reproductive Health,
Asthma and Pulmonary, Conditions Study
Section.
Date: June 11–12, 2012.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m..
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One
Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Contact Person: Lisa Steele, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3139,
MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–594–
6594, steeleln@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Population Sciences
and Epidemiology Integrated Review Group;
Epidemiology of Cancer Study Section.
Date: June 11–12, 2012.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase
Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW.,
Washington, DC 20015.
Contact Person: Denise Wiesch, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3150,
MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
0684, wieschd@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Musculoskeletal, Oral
and Skin Sciences Integrated Review Group;
Skeletal Muscle and Exercise Physiology
Study Section.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28891
Date: June 11–12, 2012
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20007.
Contact Person: Richard Ingraham, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4116,
MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–496–
8551, ingrahamrh@mail.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: May 10, 2012.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–11853 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID FEMA–2012–0012]
National Flood Insurance Program
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency intends to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
evaluating the impacts on the quality of
the human environment of the National
Flood Insurance Program as it is
currently implemented and of potential
future changes to the Program.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by
July 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
identified by Docket ID FEMA–2012–
0012 and may be submitted by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Please note that this notice of intent is
not a rulemaking and that the Federal
Rulemaking Portal is being utilized only
as a mechanism for receiving comments.
Mail: Regulatory Affairs Legal
Division, Office of Chief Counsel,
Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Room 835, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472–3100.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Blanton, Federal Emergency
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28892
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Notices
Management Agency, Office of
Environmental Planning and Historic
Preservation, 1800 South Bell Street, 7th
Floor, Arlington, VA 20598–3020.
Phone: (202) 646–2585. Fax: (202) 646–
4033.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council
on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations implementing NEPA, and
the Federal Emergency Management
Agency’s (FEMA’s) Environmental
Consideration regulations require
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for major Federal
actions that would have significant
impacts to the quality of the human
environment. FEMA is undertaking an
EIS of the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) to consider new
information relating to the
environmental impacts of the NFIP, to
update the 1976 EIS on the NFIP, and
to consider potential changes to the
program’s implementation. The CEQ
regulations at 40 CFR 1501.7 and 40
CFR 1508.22 require the issuance of a
notice of intent to prepare an EIS to
initiate the scoping process. Scoping is
an early and open process that assists
the Federal action agency in
determining the scope of issues to be
addressed and for identifying significant
issues related to a proposed action.
The U.S. Congress established the
NFIP with the passage of the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968. The NFIP
is a Federal program for property
owners in NFIP participating
communities to purchase insurance as a
protection against flood losses in
exchange for State and community
adoption and implementation of land
use criteria that reduce future flood
damages. Participation in the NFIP is
based on an agreement between
communities and the Federal
Government. If a community adopts and
enforces a FEMA approved floodplain
management ordinance to reduce future
flood risk to new construction in
regulated floodplains, the Federal
Government will make flood insurance
available to individuals within the
community as financial protection
against flood losses. This insurance is
designed to provide a financial
alternative and to reduce the escalating
costs of Federal disaster assistance for
flood damaged buildings and their
contents. The costs associated with
flood damage are reduced by nearly $1.7
billion a year through communities
implementing sound floodplain
management requirements and property
owners purchasing flood insurance.
Additionally, buildings constructed in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:41 May 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
compliance with NFIP building
standards suffer approximately 80
percent less damage annually than those
not built to NFIP standards.
The Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration (FIMA), a part of FEMA,
manages the NFIP. The three
components of the NFIP are Flood
Insurance, Floodplain Management, and
Flood Hazard Mapping. More than
21,000 communities across the United
States and its territories participate in
the NFIP by adopting and enforcing
floodplain management ordinances to
reduce future flood damages.
In addition to providing flood
insurance and reducing flood damages
through floodplain management
regulations, the NFIP identifies and
maps the Nation’s regulated floodplains.
Mapping flood hazards creates a broadbased awareness of flood hazards and
provides data needed for floodplain
management programs and to
actuarially rate new construction for
flood insurance.
FEMA has led various efforts to
identify areas for improvement within
the NFIP. In 2006, FEMA released an
evaluation of the program across five
major areas: Actuarial soundness and
the cost of flooding, compliance with
NFIP floodplain management
requirements, building standards and
identifying flood risks, insurance policy
sales and mandatory purchase
requirement, and environmental and
development impacts of the NFIP. The
evaluation can be accessed at https://
www.fema.gov/business/nfip/
nfipeval.shtm.
More recently FEMA initiated an
open and public process to modify the
NFIP which has led to the identification
of possible program changes. Many of
these changes would also account for
environmental planning and historic
preservation considerations in the
administration of the program,
including but not limited to impacts on
endangered and threatened species and
critical habitat. This effort will result in
a comprehensive series of policy
recommendations designed to transition
the NFIP toward a more resilient,
sustainable, and comprehensive
approach to flood risk management.
Information about this effort can be
found at https://www.fema.gov/business/
nfip/nfip_reform.shtm.
FEMA has developed a Purpose and
Need statement for evaluating NFIP
proposed action and alternatives. The
Purpose and Need statement discusses
the need for a National Flood Insurance
Program and the purpose laid out by
Congress. It also establishes the need to
account for Constitutional
considerations, such as due process and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
preservation of States’ rights, and
consideration of national policies such
as those established by NEPA, the
National Historic Preservation Act, the
Endangered Species Act, Executive
Order 11988—Floodplain Management,
and Executive Order 12898—Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations. FEMA has
developed five alternatives for its
consideration. In addition, FEMA has
preliminarily identified nine broad
areas for evaluation of potential for
effect on the human environment that
will be evaluated during this process.
These documents are available in this
Docket for review and comment. FEMA
proposes to evaluate the following
proposed action and alternatives in this
EIS:
(1) Modify the NFIP based upon
changes identified through the
evaluation process to enhance
floodplain management standards
including provisions to address
endangered species and habitat
concerns. This is FEMA’s proposed
action.
(2) Taking no action, which would
result in the continued administration
and implementation of the NFIP as it
stands today.
(3) Discontinue the NFIP, recognizing
that only Congress can take this action.
(4) Request legislative authority to
remove existing subsidies and cross
subsidies for flood insurance policies.
(5) Modify the NFIP based upon
changes identified through the
evaluation process to enhance
floodplain management standards
including provisions to address
endangered species and habitat
concerns and request legislative
authority to remove existing subsidies
and cross subsidies for flood insurance
policies.
This notice and public comment
request initiates the public scoping
process for this action. Public comments
submitted on these documents will
become part of the scoping record.
FEMA also intends to initiate
discussions with other Federal agencies
on the scope of this effort and identify
cooperating agencies interested in
participating as such in this process.
At this time FEMA does not plan to
conduct public scoping meetings given
the amount of public input FEMA has
already received during the NFIP
Reform process. The evaluation process
included one scoping meeting with key
stakeholders in November 2009. A
summary of the information gathered
(Phase I Report) can be found at
https://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/
nfip_reform.shtm#3. The Phase I Report
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Notices
is available in this Docket for
inspection. In December 2010, FEMA
conducted two public meetings and
opened a public comment period on
four alternatives for NFIP Reform. See
75 FR 69096, Nov. 10, 2010. Comments
received can be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/ under Docket ID
FEMA–2010–0065. These comments
will be considered part of the scoping
process for this EIS.
Authority: National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4331 et
seq.; 40 CFR part 1500; 44 CFR part 10.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012–11841 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–A6–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Intent To Request Approval From OMB
of One New Public Collection of
Information: Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
60-day notice.
The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on a new Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below that we will submit to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The proposed information
collection activity provides a means to
gather qualitative customer and
stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Send your comments by July 16,
2012.
Comments may be emailed
to TSAPRA@dhs.gov or delivered to the
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan L. Perkins at the above address,
or by telephone (571) 227–3398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:41 May 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at https://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
Purpose and Description of Data
Collection
The proposed information collection
activity provides a means to gather
qualitative customer and stakeholder
feedback in an efficient, timely manner,
in accordance with the Administration’s
commitment to improving service
delivery.
From the TSA perspective, qualitative
customer and stakeholder feedback is
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions; it
is different than the results of statistical
surveys, which yield quantitative results
that can be generalized to the
population of study. This qualitative
feedback will provide insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences, and expectations regarding
TSA products or services, provide TSA
with an early warning of issues with
service, and focus attention on areas
where improvement is needed regarding
communication, training, or changes in
operations that might improve delivery
of products or services. These
collections will allow for ongoing,
collaborative, and actionable
communications between the Agency
and its customers and stakeholders.
They will also allow feedback to
contribute directly to the improvement
of program management. The
solicitation of feedback will target areas
such as: Timeliness, appropriateness,
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28893
accuracy of information, courtesy,
efficiency of service delivery, and
resolution of issues with service
delivery. Responses will be assessed to
plan and inform efforts to improve or
maintain the quality of service offered
by TSA. If this information is not
collected, vital feedback from customers
and stakeholders on the Agency’s
services will be unavailable.
The Agency will only submit a
collection for approval under this
generic clearance if it meets the
following conditions:
• The collections are voluntary.
• The collections are low-burden for
respondents (based on considerations of
total burden hours, total number of
respondents, or burden-hours per
respondent) and are low-cost for both
the respondents and the Federal
Government.
• The collections are
noncontroversial and do not raise issues
of concern to other Federal agencies.
• Any collection is targeted to the
solicitation of opinions from
respondents who have experience with
the program or may have experience
with the program in the near future.
• Personally identifiable information
(PII) is collected only to the extent
necessary and is not retained.
As a general matter, information
collections will not result in any new
system of records containing privacy
information and will not ask questions
of a sensitive nature, such as sexual
behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs,
and other matters that are commonly
considered private.
Preliminary estimates of the aggregate
burden are based on a review of past
behavior of participating program
offices and several individual office
estimates. The likely respondents to this
proposed information request are State,
Local or Tribal Government and Law
Enforcement, traveling public,
Individuals and Households, Businesses
and Organizations. TSA estimates an
average of 10 annual activities with
approximately 12,500 respondents per
activity for a total of 125,000 responses.
TSA further estimates a frequency of
one response per request with an
average response time of 30 minutes
resulting in an estimated 62,500 burden
hours. Program offices will provide
more refined individual estimates of
burden in their subsequent notices.
Use of Results
Information gathered is intended to be
used only internally for general service
improvement and program management
purposes and is not intended for release
outside of the agency (if released, the
agency must indicate the qualitative
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28891-28893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11841]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
[Docket ID FEMA-2012-0012]
National Flood Insurance Program Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement evaluating the impacts on the quality of
the human environment of the National Flood Insurance Program as it is
currently implemented and of potential future changes to the Program.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by July 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be identified by Docket ID FEMA-2012-0012 and
may be submitted by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. Please note that this notice of
intent is not a rulemaking and that the Federal Rulemaking Portal is
being utilized only as a mechanism for receiving comments.
Mail: Regulatory Affairs Legal Division, Office of Chief Counsel,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Room 835, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472-3100.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Blanton, Federal Emergency
[[Page 28892]]
Management Agency, Office of Environmental Planning and Historic
Preservation, 1800 South Bell Street, 7th Floor, Arlington, VA 20598-
3020. Phone: (202) 646-2585. Fax: (202) 646-4033.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA's) Environmental Consideration regulations
require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for
major Federal actions that would have significant impacts to the
quality of the human environment. FEMA is undertaking an EIS of the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) to consider new information
relating to the environmental impacts of the NFIP, to update the 1976
EIS on the NFIP, and to consider potential changes to the program's
implementation. The CEQ regulations at 40 CFR 1501.7 and 40 CFR 1508.22
require the issuance of a notice of intent to prepare an EIS to
initiate the scoping process. Scoping is an early and open process that
assists the Federal action agency in determining the scope of issues to
be addressed and for identifying significant issues related to a
proposed action.
The U.S. Congress established the NFIP with the passage of the
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968. The NFIP is a Federal program for
property owners in NFIP participating communities to purchase insurance
as a protection against flood losses in exchange for State and
community adoption and implementation of land use criteria that reduce
future flood damages. Participation in the NFIP is based on an
agreement between communities and the Federal Government. If a
community adopts and enforces a FEMA approved floodplain management
ordinance to reduce future flood risk to new construction in regulated
floodplains, the Federal Government will make flood insurance available
to individuals within the community as financial protection against
flood losses. This insurance is designed to provide a financial
alternative and to reduce the escalating costs of Federal disaster
assistance for flood damaged buildings and their contents. The costs
associated with flood damage are reduced by nearly $1.7 billion a year
through communities implementing sound floodplain management
requirements and property owners purchasing flood insurance.
Additionally, buildings constructed in compliance with NFIP building
standards suffer approximately 80 percent less damage annually than
those not built to NFIP standards.
The Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration (FIMA), a part
of FEMA, manages the NFIP. The three components of the NFIP are Flood
Insurance, Floodplain Management, and Flood Hazard Mapping. More than
21,000 communities across the United States and its territories
participate in the NFIP by adopting and enforcing floodplain management
ordinances to reduce future flood damages.
In addition to providing flood insurance and reducing flood damages
through floodplain management regulations, the NFIP identifies and maps
the Nation's regulated floodplains. Mapping flood hazards creates a
broad-based awareness of flood hazards and provides data needed for
floodplain management programs and to actuarially rate new construction
for flood insurance.
FEMA has led various efforts to identify areas for improvement
within the NFIP. In 2006, FEMA released an evaluation of the program
across five major areas: Actuarial soundness and the cost of flooding,
compliance with NFIP floodplain management requirements, building
standards and identifying flood risks, insurance policy sales and
mandatory purchase requirement, and environmental and development
impacts of the NFIP. The evaluation can be accessed at https://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/nfipeval.shtm.
More recently FEMA initiated an open and public process to modify
the NFIP which has led to the identification of possible program
changes. Many of these changes would also account for environmental
planning and historic preservation considerations in the administration
of the program, including but not limited to impacts on endangered and
threatened species and critical habitat. This effort will result in a
comprehensive series of policy recommendations designed to transition
the NFIP toward a more resilient, sustainable, and comprehensive
approach to flood risk management. Information about this effort can be
found at https://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/nfip_reform.shtm.
FEMA has developed a Purpose and Need statement for evaluating NFIP
proposed action and alternatives. The Purpose and Need statement
discusses the need for a National Flood Insurance Program and the
purpose laid out by Congress. It also establishes the need to account
for Constitutional considerations, such as due process and preservation
of States' rights, and consideration of national policies such as those
established by NEPA, the National Historic Preservation Act, the
Endangered Species Act, Executive Order 11988--Floodplain Management,
and Executive Order 12898--Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations. FEMA has
developed five alternatives for its consideration. In addition, FEMA
has preliminarily identified nine broad areas for evaluation of
potential for effect on the human environment that will be evaluated
during this process. These documents are available in this Docket for
review and comment. FEMA proposes to evaluate the following proposed
action and alternatives in this EIS:
(1) Modify the NFIP based upon changes identified through the
evaluation process to enhance floodplain management standards including
provisions to address endangered species and habitat concerns. This is
FEMA's proposed action.
(2) Taking no action, which would result in the continued
administration and implementation of the NFIP as it stands today.
(3) Discontinue the NFIP, recognizing that only Congress can take
this action.
(4) Request legislative authority to remove existing subsidies and
cross subsidies for flood insurance policies.
(5) Modify the NFIP based upon changes identified through the
evaluation process to enhance floodplain management standards including
provisions to address endangered species and habitat concerns and
request legislative authority to remove existing subsidies and cross
subsidies for flood insurance policies.
This notice and public comment request initiates the public scoping
process for this action. Public comments submitted on these documents
will become part of the scoping record. FEMA also intends to initiate
discussions with other Federal agencies on the scope of this effort and
identify cooperating agencies interested in participating as such in
this process.
At this time FEMA does not plan to conduct public scoping meetings
given the amount of public input FEMA has already received during the
NFIP Reform process. The evaluation process included one scoping
meeting with key stakeholders in November 2009. A summary of the
information gathered (Phase I Report) can be found at https://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/nfip_reform.shtm#3. The Phase I Report
[[Page 28893]]
is available in this Docket for inspection. In December 2010, FEMA
conducted two public meetings and opened a public comment period on
four alternatives for NFIP Reform. See 75 FR 69096, Nov. 10, 2010.
Comments received can be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/ under
Docket ID FEMA-2010-0065. These comments will be considered part of the
scoping process for this EIS.
Authority: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.; 40 CFR part 1500; 44 CFR part 10.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-11841 Filed 5-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-A6-P