Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Alameda, Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties, CA, 28895-28896 [2012-11811]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Notices
Dashboard.do, or call the USCIS National
Customer Service Center at 1–800–375–5283.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
should address one or more of the
following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection
Request: New collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Collection of Qualitative Feedback
through Focus Groups.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security
sponsoring the collection: No Agency
Form Number; U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS).
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households; Business or other for-profit.
The information collection activity will
garner qualitative customer and
stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback USCIS means
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions,
but not responses to statistical surveys
that yield quantitative results that can
be generalized to the population of
study. This feedback will provide
information on customer and
stakeholder perceptions, experiences
and expectations, provide an early
warning of issues with service, and/or
focus attention on areas where
communication, training, or changes in
operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:41 May 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
28895
will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the
Agency and its customers and
stakeholders and contribute directly to
the improvement of program
management. Feedback collected under
this generic clearance will provide
useful information, but it will not be
generalized to the overall population.
This data collection will not be used to
generate quantitative information that is
designed to yield reliably actionable
results, such as monitoring trends over
time or documenting program
performance.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: Focus Group with
Stakeholders, 500 respondents × 1.5
hours per response = 750 hours; Focus
Group with Immigrants, 500
respondents × 1.5 hours per response =
750 hours. Total annual hours burden =
1,500 hours.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 1,500 Hours.
If you need a copy of the information
collection instrument with
supplementary documents, or need
additional information, please visit
https://www.regulations.gov.
We may also be contacted at: USCIS,
Regulatory Coordination Division,
Office of Policy and Strategy, 20
Massachusetts Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20529–2020;
Telephone 202–272–1470.
SUMMARY:
Dated: May 10, 2012.
Sunday A. Aigbe,
Acting Chief Regulatory Coordinator,
Regulatory Coordination Division, Office of
Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
Winnie Chan, Refuge Planner, or Eric
Mruz, Refuge Manager, at (510) 792–
0222 or sfbaynwrc@fws.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), which amended the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, requires the
Service to develop a CCP for each
national wildlife refuge. The purpose in
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
[FR Doc. 2012–11778 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2012–N005;
FXRS12650800000–123–FF08R0000]
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge, Alameda,
Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties,
CA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments: draft comprehensive
conservation plan/environmental
assessment.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) announce the
availability of a Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan (CCP) and
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge for public
review and comment. The CCP/EA,
prepared under the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, and in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, describes how the Service
proposes to manage the Refuge for the
next 15 years. Draft compatibility
determinations for several existing and
proposed uses are also available for
review and public comment with the
Draft CCP/EA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
July 2, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods.
Email: sfbaynwrc@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Don Edwards SFB CCP’’ in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Winnie Chan, (510) 792–
5828.
U.S. Mail: San Francisco Bay National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 1 Marshlands
Road, Fremont, CA 94555.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off
comments during regular business
hours, please call (510) 792–0222 for
directions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
28896
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
in accordance with the Improvement
Act.
We initiated the CCP/EA for the Don
Edwards San Francisco Bay National
Wildlife Refuge in October 2009. We
then hosted a series of pre-scoping
meetings on October 28, 2009;
November 3, 2009; and November 5,
2009. An average of 10 persons attended
each of the meetings. A number of
individuals provided comments at the
meetings, via email, and by postal mail.
Following the pre-scoping meetings, we
published a Federal Register notice of
intent on February 23, 2010 (75 FR
8106), to solicit additional comments.
To announce the scoping comment
period and provide background on the
Refuge, we also mailed a planning
update to over 200 agency and
organization representatives, including
members of the public, media, and
elected representatives of each of the
counties where the Refuge is located.
The scoping comment period ended on
April 26, 2010. We also created a web
page (https://www.fws.gov/cno/refuges/
DonEdwards/DonEdwards.cfm) to share
information. In 2011, we hosted another
series of public meetings on April 13,
2011 and April 19, 2011 to present
management alternatives. An average of
15 persons attended each of these
meetings. Verbal comments were
recorded at these public meetings, and
written comments were submitted via
postal mail and email.
Background
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge was
established in 1972 pursuant to the Act
Authorizing the Transfer of Certain Real
Property for Wildlife, or other purposes
(16 U.S.C. 667b), Endangered Species
Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1537), and the
Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C.
742f(b)(1)). The roughly 30,000-acre Don
Edwards San Francisco Bay National
Wildlife Refuge, located in the Alameda,
Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties of
California, consists of several
noncontiguous parcels divided into four
management units that surround the
southern edge of the San Francisco Bay.
The Refuge was established to preserve
and enhance wildlife habitat, protect
migratory birds, and protect threatened
and endangered species. The Refuge
also provides opportunities for wildlifedependent recreation and
environmental education.
Alternatives
The Draft CCP/EA identifies and
evaluates three alternatives for
managing the Don Edwards San
Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge
for the next 15 years. The alternative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:41 May 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
that appears to best meet the Refuge
purposes is identified as the preferred
alternative. The preferred alternative is
identified based on the analysis
presented in the Draft CCP/EA, which
may be modified following the
completion of the public comment
period based on comments received
from other agencies, Tribal
governments, nongovernmental
organizations, or individuals.
Under Alternative A (no action
alternative), the current management
actions, including habitat management,
wildlife management, wildlife-oriented
recreation opportunities, and
environmental education, would be
continued. Habitat and wildlife
management activities would include
habitat restoration projects, invasive
weed management, wildlife surveys,
and predator management. We would
continue to offer a wide variety of
wildlife-oriented recreation
opportunities to the public. The
environmental education program
would continue to provide a variety of
environmental education activities for
local schools. Also, we would continue
to use volunteers to support the biology,
visitor services, environmental
education, and management needs of
the Refuge. Current staffing and funding
would remain the same. Existing
restoration and management plans (e.g.,
Bair Island Restoration and Management
Plan and South Bay Salt Pond
Restoration Project) would continue to
be implemented. We would also
actively work with partners and willing
sellers to acquire the remaining lands
within the approved acquisition
boundary.
Alternative B (preferred alternative)
includes those actions in Alternative A.
In addition, we would moderately
expand biological, habitat management,
visitor service, and environmental
education activities. Additional
biological activities would include
increased survey efforts on priority
listed species as well as baseline
surveys on native focal flora and fauna.
Habitat would be improved for the
western snowy plover and California
least tern. Other habitat management
activities include completion and
implementation of a comprehensive
weed management plan, additional
improvement to tidal marsh areas such
as enhancement and restoration of the
marsh-upland ecotone, and addressing
climate change impacts on Refuge
resources. The National Wildlife Refuge
System’s priority public uses—wildlife
observation, photography, hunting,
fishing, interpretation, and
environmental education—would all be
enhanced on the Refuge. Refuge staff
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
would expand the volunteer program to
recruit new volunteers and provide
additional learning opportunities to
existing volunteers. Additional staff and
funding would be needed to implement
this alternative.
Under Alternative C, in addition to
tasks included in Alternative A and B,
we would increase the frequency of
baseline monitoring, investigate
reintroduction of listed species (e.g., the
salt marsh harvest mouse and the
California clapper rail), survey for listed
plant species, and encourage additional
research to benefit listed species.
Additional habitat management actions
would include further tidal marsh
improvements, more aggressive control
of invasive weeds, revegetation of
grassland areas, and more aggressive
enhancement and restoration of the
marsh-upland ecotone. All priority
public uses would be further improved,
such as opening additional acreage to
hunting, installing additional
interpretive signage, constructing an
auto tour route, and enhancing the
environmental education program
offsite, beyond the existing field trip
experience. Additional staff and funding
would be needed to implement this
alternative.
Review and Comment
Copies of the Draft CCP/EA may be
obtained by writing to Winnie Chan (see
ADDRESSES). Copies of the Draft CCP/EA
may be viewed at the same address and
local libraries. The Draft CCP/EA will
also be available for viewing and
downloading online at: https://
www.fws.gov/cno/refuges/DonEdwards/
DonEdwards.cfm.
Comments on the Draft CCP/EA
should be addressed to Winnie Chan
(see ADDRESSES).
At the end of the review and comment
period for this Draft CCP/EA, comments
will be analyzed by the Service and
addressed in the Final CCP/EA. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2012–11811 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28895-28896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11811]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-R-2012-N005; FXRS12650800000-123-FF08R0000]
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Alameda,
Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments: draft
comprehensive conservation plan/environmental assessment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announce the
availability of a Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge for public review and comment. The CCP/EA,
prepared under the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, and in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, describes how the Service proposes to manage the Refuge for the
next 15 years. Draft compatibility determinations for several existing
and proposed uses are also available for review and public comment with
the Draft CCP/EA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by July 2, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods.
Email: sfbaynwrc@fws.gov. Include ``Don Edwards SFB CCP'' in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Winnie Chan, (510) 792-5828.
U.S. Mail: San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 1
Marshlands Road, Fremont, CA 94555.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off comments during regular
business hours, please call (510) 792-0222 for directions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Winnie Chan, Refuge Planner, or Eric
Mruz, Refuge Manager, at (510) 792-0222 or sfbaynwrc@fws.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), which amended the
National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, requires
the Service to develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose in developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-
year plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify
wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, environmental education and interpretation. We will review
and update the CCP at least every 15 years
[[Page 28896]]
in accordance with the Improvement Act.
We initiated the CCP/EA for the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge in October 2009. We then hosted a series of
pre-scoping meetings on October 28, 2009; November 3, 2009; and
November 5, 2009. An average of 10 persons attended each of the
meetings. A number of individuals provided comments at the meetings,
via email, and by postal mail. Following the pre-scoping meetings, we
published a Federal Register notice of intent on February 23, 2010 (75
FR 8106), to solicit additional comments. To announce the scoping
comment period and provide background on the Refuge, we also mailed a
planning update to over 200 agency and organization representatives,
including members of the public, media, and elected representatives of
each of the counties where the Refuge is located. The scoping comment
period ended on April 26, 2010. We also created a web page (https://www.fws.gov/cno/refuges/DonEdwards/DonEdwards.cfm) to share
information. In 2011, we hosted another series of public meetings on
April 13, 2011 and April 19, 2011 to present management alternatives.
An average of 15 persons attended each of these meetings. Verbal
comments were recorded at these public meetings, and written comments
were submitted via postal mail and email.
Background
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge was
established in 1972 pursuant to the Act Authorizing the Transfer of
Certain Real Property for Wildlife, or other purposes (16 U.S.C. 667b),
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1537), and the Fish and
Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742f(b)(1)). The roughly 30,000-acre
Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, located in the
Alameda, Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties of California, consists of
several noncontiguous parcels divided into four management units that
surround the southern edge of the San Francisco Bay. The Refuge was
established to preserve and enhance wildlife habitat, protect migratory
birds, and protect threatened and endangered species. The Refuge also
provides opportunities for wildlife-dependent recreation and
environmental education.
Alternatives
The Draft CCP/EA identifies and evaluates three alternatives for
managing the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge for
the next 15 years. The alternative that appears to best meet the Refuge
purposes is identified as the preferred alternative. The preferred
alternative is identified based on the analysis presented in the Draft
CCP/EA, which may be modified following the completion of the public
comment period based on comments received from other agencies, Tribal
governments, nongovernmental organizations, or individuals.
Under Alternative A (no action alternative), the current management
actions, including habitat management, wildlife management, wildlife-
oriented recreation opportunities, and environmental education, would
be continued. Habitat and wildlife management activities would include
habitat restoration projects, invasive weed management, wildlife
surveys, and predator management. We would continue to offer a wide
variety of wildlife-oriented recreation opportunities to the public.
The environmental education program would continue to provide a variety
of environmental education activities for local schools. Also, we would
continue to use volunteers to support the biology, visitor services,
environmental education, and management needs of the Refuge. Current
staffing and funding would remain the same. Existing restoration and
management plans (e.g., Bair Island Restoration and Management Plan and
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project) would continue to be
implemented. We would also actively work with partners and willing
sellers to acquire the remaining lands within the approved acquisition
boundary.
Alternative B (preferred alternative) includes those actions in
Alternative A. In addition, we would moderately expand biological,
habitat management, visitor service, and environmental education
activities. Additional biological activities would include increased
survey efforts on priority listed species as well as baseline surveys
on native focal flora and fauna. Habitat would be improved for the
western snowy plover and California least tern. Other habitat
management activities include completion and implementation of a
comprehensive weed management plan, additional improvement to tidal
marsh areas such as enhancement and restoration of the marsh-upland
ecotone, and addressing climate change impacts on Refuge resources. The
National Wildlife Refuge System's priority public uses--wildlife
observation, photography, hunting, fishing, interpretation, and
environmental education--would all be enhanced on the Refuge. Refuge
staff would expand the volunteer program to recruit new volunteers and
provide additional learning opportunities to existing volunteers.
Additional staff and funding would be needed to implement this
alternative.
Under Alternative C, in addition to tasks included in Alternative A
and B, we would increase the frequency of baseline monitoring,
investigate reintroduction of listed species (e.g., the salt marsh
harvest mouse and the California clapper rail), survey for listed plant
species, and encourage additional research to benefit listed species.
Additional habitat management actions would include further tidal marsh
improvements, more aggressive control of invasive weeds, revegetation
of grassland areas, and more aggressive enhancement and restoration of
the marsh-upland ecotone. All priority public uses would be further
improved, such as opening additional acreage to hunting, installing
additional interpretive signage, constructing an auto tour route, and
enhancing the environmental education program offsite, beyond the
existing field trip experience. Additional staff and funding would be
needed to implement this alternative.
Review and Comment
Copies of the Draft CCP/EA may be obtained by writing to Winnie
Chan (see ADDRESSES). Copies of the Draft CCP/EA may be viewed at the
same address and local libraries. The Draft CCP/EA will also be
available for viewing and downloading online at: https://www.fws.gov/cno/refuges/DonEdwards/DonEdwards.cfm.
Comments on the Draft CCP/EA should be addressed to Winnie Chan
(see ADDRESSES).
At the end of the review and comment period for this Draft CCP/EA,
comments will be analyzed by the Service and addressed in the Final
CCP/EA. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2012-11811 Filed 5-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P