Inland Waterways Navigation Regulations, 28825 [2012-11801]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Dated: May 10, 2012.
Erin H. Ledford,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard,
Acting Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law (CG–0943).
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 162
[FR Doc. 2012–11801 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1086]
RIN 1625–AB84
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Inland Waterways Navigation
Regulations
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0114; FRL–9670–6]
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
Correction of Preamble.
ACTION:
This document makes a
correction to the preamble of the Notice
of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that
was published in the Federal Register
on May 8, 2012 (77 FR 27007). In the
Basis and Purpose section of that
NPRM, the Coast Guard stated that the
channel between the Detroit River Light
and the D33 stationary light is roughly
twelve-hundred yards wide. This
statement is incorrect. The channel in
that area is approximately twelvehundred feet wide.
SUMMARY:
LT
Adrian Palomeque, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Detroit,
Detroit, Michigan, (313) 568–9508 or
Adrian.F.Palomeque@uscg.mil.
Correction: On May 8, 2012, the Coast
Guard published in the Federal Register
an NPRM, proposing to amend 33 CFR
Part 162. Specifically, the Coast Guard
proposed to redefine the geographical
points described in 33 CFR
162.138(a)(1)(ii) so that the southern
point of the restricted speed area
contained therein would be relocated
from its current location to a point
approximately 2.5 statute miles to the
north.
The NPRM contained an error in the
‘‘Basis and Purpose’’ section.
Specifically, the NPRM’s Basis and
Purpose section incorrectly stated that
the channel width between the Detroit
River Light and the D33 stationary light
is roughly ‘‘twelve-hundred yards’’
wide. That is incorrect. The channel in
that location is roughly ‘‘twelvehundred feet’’ wide. Although this error
does not affect the proposed rulemaking
that would amend 33 CFR Part 162, the
Coast Guard recognizes the confusion
that this error might create.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard continues
to invite comments on the proposed rule
that was published in the Federal
Register on May 8, 2012. (77 FR 27007).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:58 May 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
Approval, Disapproval and
Promulgation of State Implementation
Plans; State of Utah; Regional Haze
Rule Requirements for Mandatory
Class I Areas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to partially
approve and partially disapprove a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Utah on May
26, 2011 that addresses regional haze.
EPA is also proposing to approve
specific sections of a State of Utah SIP
revision submitted on September 9,
2008 to address regional haze. These SIP
revisions were submitted to address the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) and our rules that require states
to prevent any future and remedy any
existing man-made impairment of
visibility in mandatory Class I areas
caused by emissions of air pollutants
from numerous sources located over a
wide geographic area (also referred to as
the ‘‘regional haze program’’). States are
required to assure reasonable progress
toward the national goal of achieving
natural visibility conditions in Class I
areas. EPA is taking this action pursuant
to section 110 of the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2011–0114, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: r8airrulemakings@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28825
• Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director,
Air Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. Such deliveries are only
accepted Monday through Friday,
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2011–
0114. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I.
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 28825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11801]
[[Page 28825]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 162
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1086]
RIN 1625-AB84
Inland Waterways Navigation Regulations
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; Correction of Preamble.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to the preamble of the Notice
of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that was published in the Federal
Register on May 8, 2012 (77 FR 27007). In the Basis and Purpose section
of that NPRM, the Coast Guard stated that the channel between the
Detroit River Light and the D33 stationary light is roughly twelve-
hundred yards wide. This statement is incorrect. The channel in that
area is approximately twelve-hundred feet wide.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Adrian Palomeque, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Detroit, Detroit, Michigan, (313) 568-
9508 or Adrian.F.Palomeque@uscg.mil.
Correction: On May 8, 2012, the Coast Guard published in the
Federal Register an NPRM, proposing to amend 33 CFR Part 162.
Specifically, the Coast Guard proposed to redefine the geographical
points described in 33 CFR 162.138(a)(1)(ii) so that the southern point
of the restricted speed area contained therein would be relocated from
its current location to a point approximately 2.5 statute miles to the
north.
The NPRM contained an error in the ``Basis and Purpose'' section.
Specifically, the NPRM's Basis and Purpose section incorrectly stated
that the channel width between the Detroit River Light and the D33
stationary light is roughly ``twelve-hundred yards'' wide. That is
incorrect. The channel in that location is roughly ``twelve-hundred
feet'' wide. Although this error does not affect the proposed
rulemaking that would amend 33 CFR Part 162, the Coast Guard recognizes
the confusion that this error might create. Accordingly, the Coast
Guard continues to invite comments on the proposed rule that was
published in the Federal Register on May 8, 2012. (77 FR 27007).
Dated: May 10, 2012.
Erin H. Ledford,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Office of
Regulations and Administrative Law (CG-0943).
[FR Doc. 2012-11801 Filed 5-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
