Inland Waterways Navigation Regulations, 28825 [2012-11801]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules Dated: May 10, 2012. Erin H. Ledford, Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law (CG–0943). DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 162 [FR Doc. 2012–11801 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P [Docket No. USCG–2011–1086] RIN 1625–AB84 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Inland Waterways Navigation Regulations 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0114; FRL–9670–6] AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking; Correction of Preamble. ACTION: This document makes a correction to the preamble of the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that was published in the Federal Register on May 8, 2012 (77 FR 27007). In the Basis and Purpose section of that NPRM, the Coast Guard stated that the channel between the Detroit River Light and the D33 stationary light is roughly twelve-hundred yards wide. This statement is incorrect. The channel in that area is approximately twelvehundred feet wide. SUMMARY: LT Adrian Palomeque, Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Detroit, Detroit, Michigan, (313) 568–9508 or Adrian.F.Palomeque@uscg.mil. Correction: On May 8, 2012, the Coast Guard published in the Federal Register an NPRM, proposing to amend 33 CFR Part 162. Specifically, the Coast Guard proposed to redefine the geographical points described in 33 CFR 162.138(a)(1)(ii) so that the southern point of the restricted speed area contained therein would be relocated from its current location to a point approximately 2.5 statute miles to the north. The NPRM contained an error in the ‘‘Basis and Purpose’’ section. Specifically, the NPRM’s Basis and Purpose section incorrectly stated that the channel width between the Detroit River Light and the D33 stationary light is roughly ‘‘twelve-hundred yards’’ wide. That is incorrect. The channel in that location is roughly ‘‘twelvehundred feet’’ wide. Although this error does not affect the proposed rulemaking that would amend 33 CFR Part 162, the Coast Guard recognizes the confusion that this error might create. Accordingly, the Coast Guard continues to invite comments on the proposed rule that was published in the Federal Register on May 8, 2012. (77 FR 27007). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:58 May 15, 2012 Jkt 226001 Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Utah; Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Mandatory Class I Areas Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: EPA is proposing to partially approve and partially disapprove a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Utah on May 26, 2011 that addresses regional haze. EPA is also proposing to approve specific sections of a State of Utah SIP revision submitted on September 9, 2008 to address regional haze. These SIP revisions were submitted to address the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and our rules that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing man-made impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ‘‘regional haze program’’). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is taking this action pursuant to section 110 of the CAA. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 16, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– OAR–2011–0114, by one of the following methods: • http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Email: r8airrulemakings@epa.gov. • Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments). • Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P– AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 28825 • Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P– AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2011– 0114. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA, without going through http:// www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I. General Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http:// www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly-available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Program, Environmental E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM 16MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 28825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11801]



[[Page 28825]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 162

[Docket No. USCG-2011-1086]
RIN 1625-AB84


Inland Waterways Navigation Regulations

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; Correction of Preamble.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to the preamble of the Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that was published in the Federal 
Register on May 8, 2012 (77 FR 27007). In the Basis and Purpose section 
of that NPRM, the Coast Guard stated that the channel between the 
Detroit River Light and the D33 stationary light is roughly twelve-
hundred yards wide. This statement is incorrect. The channel in that 
area is approximately twelve-hundred feet wide.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Adrian Palomeque, Prevention 
Department, Coast Guard Sector Detroit, Detroit, Michigan, (313) 568-
9508 or Adrian.F.Palomeque@uscg.mil.
    Correction: On May 8, 2012, the Coast Guard published in the 
Federal Register an NPRM, proposing to amend 33 CFR Part 162. 
Specifically, the Coast Guard proposed to redefine the geographical 
points described in 33 CFR 162.138(a)(1)(ii) so that the southern point 
of the restricted speed area contained therein would be relocated from 
its current location to a point approximately 2.5 statute miles to the 
north.
    The NPRM contained an error in the ``Basis and Purpose'' section. 
Specifically, the NPRM's Basis and Purpose section incorrectly stated 
that the channel width between the Detroit River Light and the D33 
stationary light is roughly ``twelve-hundred yards'' wide. That is 
incorrect. The channel in that location is roughly ``twelve-hundred 
feet'' wide. Although this error does not affect the proposed 
rulemaking that would amend 33 CFR Part 162, the Coast Guard recognizes 
the confusion that this error might create. Accordingly, the Coast 
Guard continues to invite comments on the proposed rule that was 
published in the Federal Register on May 8, 2012. (77 FR 27007).

    Dated: May 10, 2012.
Erin H. Ledford,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Office of 
Regulations and Administrative Law (CG-0943).
[FR Doc. 2012-11801 Filed 5-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P