Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-59; Small Entity Compliance Guide, 27551-27552 [2012-11152]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FAC 2005–59, FAR Case 2012–003.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Cost Accounting Standards (CAS)
Board published a final rule in the
Federal Register at 76 FR 79545, on
December 22, 2011, which revised the
threshold for the application of CAS
from ‘‘$650,000’’ to ‘‘the Truth in
Negotiations Act (TINA) threshold, as
adjusted for inflation (41 U.S.C. 1908
and 41 U.S.C. 1502(b)(1)(B))’’ in the
CAS provisions and clauses at 48 CFR
parts 9901 and 9903. The TINA
threshold is adjusted every 5 years for
inflation, as required by 41 U.S.C. 1908.
Title 41 U.S.C. 1502(b)(1)(B) ties the
CAS applicability threshold to the
dollar value of the TINA threshold
(currently $700,000). The FAR cites the
TINA threshold at FAR 15.403–4(a)(1).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES2
II. Discussion and Analysis
This final rule revises the CAS
applicability threshold from $650,000 to
$700,000 at FAR 30.201–4 and the CAS
clauses in the FAR at 52.230–1 through
50.230–5. The FAR replaced ‘‘$650,000’’
with ‘‘$700,000’’ rather than the phrase
‘‘the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA)
threshold, as adjusted for inflation (41
U.S.C. 1908 and 41 U.S.C.
1502(b)(1)(B))’’ (the phrase used by the
CAS Board in its rule) as applicable.
The FAR made this change from the
CAS Board’s rule for improved clarity of
FAR 30.201–4 and the CAS clauses in
the FAR—stating the specific dollar
value of the TINA threshold, rather than
a reference to the TINA threshold as was
done in the CAS Board’s final rule. In
so doing, no further action will be
required by the CAS Board to
implement further adjustments for
inflation in the future as permitted by
the CAS Board’s rule; the CAS
applicability thresholds in the FAR will
be revised every 5 years in the future,
whenever the TINA threshold is revised
in the FAR as part of the statutory
revision of the acquisition thresholds.
Publication of This Final Rule for Public
Comment Is Not Required by Statute
‘‘Publication of proposed
regulations,’’ 41 U.S.C. 1707, is the
statute which applies to the publication
of the FAR. Paragraph (a)(1) of the
statute requires that a procurement
policy, regulation, procedure or form
(including an amendment or
modification thereof) must be published
for public comment if it relates to the
expenditure of appropriated funds, and
has either a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of the
agency issuing the policy, regulation,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:26 May 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
procedure or form, or has a significant
cost or administrative impact on
contractors or offerors. This final rule is
not required to be published for public
comment, because it recognizes actions
taken by the Cost Accounting Standards
Board that have already been published
for public comment; the changes in this
rule are made to conform the FAR to the
CAS Board final rule published in the
Federal Register at 76 FR 79545, on
December 22, 2011.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 30 and
52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 3, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR parts 30 and 52 as set
forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 30 and 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
PART 30—COST ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
30.201–4
[Amended]
2. Amend section 30.201–4 by
removing from paragraph (b)(1)
‘‘$650,000’’ and adding ‘‘$700,000’’ in
its place.
■
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.230–1
[Amended]
3. Amend section 52.230–1 by
revising the date of the provision to read
‘‘(MAY 2012)’’; and removing from
paragraph (a) of the Disclosure
Statement I ‘‘$650,000’’ and adding
‘‘$700,000’’ in its place.
■
52.230–2
[Amended]
4. Amend section 52.230–2 by
revising the date of the clause to read
‘‘(MAY 2012)’’; and removing from
paragraph (d) ‘‘$650,000’’ and adding
‘‘$700,000’’ in its place.
■
52.230–3
[Amended]
5. Amend section 52.230–3 by
revising the date of the clause to read
‘‘(MAY 2012)’’; and removing from
paragraph (d)(2) ‘‘$650,000’’ and adding
‘‘$700,000’’ in its place.
■
52.230–4
[Amended]
6. Amend section 52.230–4 by
revising the date of the clause to read
‘‘(MAY 2012)’’; and removing from
paragraph (d)(2) ‘‘$650,000’’ and adding
‘‘$700,000’’ in its place.
■
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule because this final
rule does not constitute a significant
FAR revision within the meaning of
FAR 1.501–1 and 41 U.S.C. 1707 and
does not require publication for public
comment.
PO 00000
27551
52.230–5
[Amended]
7. Amend section 52.230–5 by
revising the date of the clause to read
‘‘(MAY 2012)’’; and removing from
paragraph (d)(2) ‘‘$650,000’’ and adding
‘‘$700,000’’ in its place.
■
[FR Doc. 2012–11151 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Chapter 1
[Docket FAR 2012–0081, Sequence 4]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–59;
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10MYR2.SGM
10MYR2
27552
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.
This document is issued
under the joint authority of DOD, GSA,
and NASA. This Small Entity
Compliance Guide has been prepared in
accordance with section 212 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a
SUMMARY:
summary of the rule appearing in
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005–59, which amends the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR).
Interested parties may obtain further
information regarding this rule by
referring to FAC 2005–59, which
precedes this document. These
documents are also available via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
DATES:
May 10, 2012.
For
clarification of content, contact the
analyst whose name appears in the table
below. Please cite FAC 2005–59 and the
FAR case number. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LIST OF RULES IN FAC 2005–59
Item
I
II
III
Subject
Prohition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations .......................................................................
Free Trade Agreement—Colombia ..................................................................................................................
Revision of Cost Accounting Standards Threshold .........................................................................................
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summaries for each FAR rule follow.
For the actual revisions and/or
amendments made by these FAR cases,
refer to the specific item numbers and
subject set forth in the documents
following these item summaries. FAC
2005–59 amends the FAR as specified
below:
Item I—Prohibition on Contracting
With Inverted Domestic Corporations
(FAR Case 2012–013) (Interim)
This interim rule implements section
738 of Division C of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112–
74), which prohibits the award of
contracts using Fiscal Year 2012
appropriated funds to any foreign
incorporated entity that is treated as an
inverted domestic corporation or to any
subsidiary of such an entity. This
interim rule extends an existing
prohibition that applied to use of Fiscal
Years 2008 through 2010 funds.
Contracting officers are prohibited from
awarding contracts using appropriated
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES2
FAR Case
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:26 May 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
funds to any foreign incorporated entity
that is treated as an inverted domestic
corporation or to any subsidiary of such
entity, unless an exception applies. The
exceptions are at FAR 9.108–2. This rule
is not expected to have an effect on
small business because this rule will
only impact an offeror that is an
inverted domestic corporation and
wants to do business with the
Government. Small business concerns
are unlikely to have been incorporated
in the United States and then
reincorporated in a tax haven.
Item II—Free Trade Agreement—
Colombia (FAR Case 2012–012)
This interim rule implements a new
Free Trade Agreement with Colombia
(see the United States-Colombia Trade
Promotion Agreement Implementation
Act (Pub. L. 112–42) (19 U.S.C. 3805
note)).
This Trade Promotion Agreement is a
free trade agreement that provides for
mutually non-discriminatory treatment
of eligible products and services from
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
2012–013
2012–012
2012–003
Analyst
Jackson.
Davis.
Chambers.
Colombia. This interim rule is not
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Item III—Revision of Cost Accounting
Standards Threshold (FAR Case 2012–
003)
This final rule revises the cost
accounting standards (CAS) threshold in
order to implement in the FAR a recent
rule of the Cost Accounting Standards
Board and statutory requirements. The
threshold now equals the Truth in
Negotiations Act (TINA) threshold,
currently $700,000. There is no impact
on small businesses as they are exempt
from CAS pursuant to 48 CFR 9903.201–
1(b).
Dated: May 3, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–11152 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
E:\FR\FM\10MYR2.SGM
10MYR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27551-27552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11152]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Chapter 1
[Docket FAR 2012-0081, Sequence 4]
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular
2005-59; Small Entity Compliance Guide
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA),
[[Page 27552]]
and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of DOD, GSA,
and NASA. This Small Entity Compliance Guide has been prepared in
accordance with section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a summary of the rule
appearing in Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-59, which amends
the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Interested parties may obtain
further information regarding this rule by referring to FAC 2005-59,
which precedes this document. These documents are also available via
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
DATES: May 10, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact
the analyst whose name appears in the table below. Please cite FAC
2005-59 and the FAR case number. For information pertaining to status
or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat at 202-
501-4755.
List of Rules in FAC 2005-59
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item Subject FAR Case Analyst
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Prohition on Contracting 2012-013 Jackson.
with Inverted Domestic
Corporations.
II Free Trade Agreement-- 2012-012 Davis.
Colombia.
III Revision of Cost 2012-003 Chambers.
Accounting Standards
Threshold.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summaries for each FAR rule follow. For the
actual revisions and/or amendments made by these FAR cases, refer to
the specific item numbers and subject set forth in the documents
following these item summaries. FAC 2005-59 amends the FAR as specified
below:
Item I--Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations
(FAR Case 2012-013) (Interim)
This interim rule implements section 738 of Division C of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74), which prohibits
the award of contracts using Fiscal Year 2012 appropriated funds to any
foreign incorporated entity that is treated as an inverted domestic
corporation or to any subsidiary of such an entity. This interim rule
extends an existing prohibition that applied to use of Fiscal Years
2008 through 2010 funds. Contracting officers are prohibited from
awarding contracts using appropriated funds to any foreign incorporated
entity that is treated as an inverted domestic corporation or to any
subsidiary of such entity, unless an exception applies. The exceptions
are at FAR 9.108-2. This rule is not expected to have an effect on
small business because this rule will only impact an offeror that is an
inverted domestic corporation and wants to do business with the
Government. Small business concerns are unlikely to have been
incorporated in the United States and then reincorporated in a tax
haven.
Item II--Free Trade Agreement--Colombia (FAR Case 2012-012)
This interim rule implements a new Free Trade Agreement with
Colombia (see the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 112-42) (19 U.S.C. 3805 note)).
This Trade Promotion Agreement is a free trade agreement that
provides for mutually non-discriminatory treatment of eligible products
and services from Colombia. This interim rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Item III--Revision of Cost Accounting Standards Threshold (FAR Case
2012-003)
This final rule revises the cost accounting standards (CAS)
threshold in order to implement in the FAR a recent rule of the Cost
Accounting Standards Board and statutory requirements. The threshold
now equals the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) threshold, currently
$700,000. There is no impact on small businesses as they are exempt
from CAS pursuant to 48 CFR 9903.201-1(b).
Dated: May 3, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-11152 Filed 5-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P