Federal Acquisition Regulation; Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations, 27547-27548 [2012-11148]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Mr.
Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, at 202–208–4949, for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FAC 2005–59, FAR Case 2012–013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 9 and 52
[FAC 2005–59; FAR Case 2012–013;
Item I; Docket 2012–0013, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM22
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Prohibition on Contracting With
Inverted Domestic Corporations
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Interim rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing an interim rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement a section of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012, that prohibits
the award of contracts using
appropriated funds to any foreign
incorporated entity that is treated as an
inverted domestic corporation or to any
subsidiary of such entity.
DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2012.
Comment Date: Interested parties
should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat on or before July
9, 2012 to be considered in the
formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by FAC 2005–59, FAR Case
2012–013 by any of the following
methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching ‘‘FAR Case 2012–013’’. Select
the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2012–
013’’. Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2012–
013’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street NE., 7th floor, Washington,
DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAC 2005–59, FAR Case
2012–013, in all correspondence related
to this case. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:26 May 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
I. Background
This rule implements section 738 of
Division C of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112–
74), which was signed on December 23,
2011. The same Governmentwide
restrictions are already incorporated in
the FAR for funds appropriated in Fiscal
Years 2008 through 2010, under FAR
Case 2008–009, which published as an
interim rule in the Federal Register at
74 FR 31561 on July 1, 2009, and as a
final rule which published in the
Federal Register at 76 FR 31410 on May
31, 2011.
Section 738 of Division C extends to
the use of Federal appropriated funds
for Fiscal Year 2012, the prohibition
against contracting with any inverted
domestic corporation, as defined at
section 835(b) of the Homeland Security
Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–296, 6 U.S.C.
395(b)) or any subsidiary of such an
entity.
An inverted domestic corporation is
one that used to be incorporated in the
United States, or used to be a
partnership in the United States, but
now is incorporated in a foreign
country, or is a subsidiary whose parent
corporation is incorporated in a foreign
country. See the definition of inverted
domestic corporation at FAR 9.108–1.
As in past consolidated
appropriations acts that prohibited
contracting with inverted domestic
corporations, the prohibition does not
apply when using Fiscal Year 2012
funds for a contract entered into before
the date the funds were appropriated
(December 23, 2011), or for any order
issued pursuant to such contract. A
paragraph has been added to FAR
52.209–10, Prohibition on Contracting
with Inverted Domestic Corporations, to
refer to the FAR 9.108–2 exceptions to
the prohibition.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
27547
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense (DoD), the
General Services Administration (GSA),
and the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) do not expect
this rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because this rule will only
impact an offeror that is an inverted
domestic corporation and wants to do
business with the Government. It is
expected that the number of entities
impacted by this rule will be minimal.
Small business concerns are unlikely to
have been incorporated in the United
States and then reincorporated in a tax
haven; the major players in these
transactions are reportedly the very
large multinational corporations. No
domestic entities will be impacted by
this rule. For the definition of ‘‘small
business,’’ the Regulatory Flexibility Act
refers to the Small Business Act, which
in turn allows the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) Administrator to
specify detailed definitions or standards
(5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C. 632(a)).
The SBA regulations at 13 CFR 121.105
discuss who is a small business: ‘‘(a)(1)
Except for small agricultural
cooperatives, a business concern eligible
for assistance from SBA as a small
business is a business entity organized
for profit, with a place of business
located in the United States, and which
operates primarily within the United
States or which makes a significant
contribution to the U.S. economy
through payment of taxes or use of
American products, materials or labor.’’
Therefore, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis has not been
performed. DoD, GSA, and NASA invite
comments from small business concerns
and other interested parties on the
expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by the rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C 610
(FAR Case 2012–013), in
correspondence.
E:\FR\FM\10MYR2.SGM
10MYR2
27548
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
V. Determination To Issue an Interim
Rule
A determination has been made under
the authority of the Secretary of Defense
(DoD), the Administrator of General
Services (GSA), and the Administrator
of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) that urgent and
compelling reasons exist to promulgate
this interim rule without prior
opportunity for public comment. This
action is necessary because it
implements section 738 of Division C of
Public Law 112–74, which went into
effect on December 23, 2011.
Contracting officers who violate this
prohibition may be subject to
prosecution for violation of the AntiDeficiency Act. However, pursuant to 41
U.S.C. 1707 and FAR 1.501–3(b), DoD,
GSA, and NASA will consider public
comments received in response to this
interim rule in the formation of the final
rule.
that is treated as an inverted domestic
corporation, or with a subsidiary of such
a corporation. * * *
(b) * * *
(4) When using Fiscal Year 2012
funds for any contract entered into
before December 23, 2011, or for any
order issued pursuant to such contract.
9.108–3
[Amended]
3. Amend section 9.108–3 by
removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘funds,
an’’ and adding ‘‘funds or Fiscal Year
2012 funds, an’’ in its place.
■
9.108–5
[Amended]
4. Amend section 9.108–5 by
removing from the introductory text
‘‘2010, unless’’ and adding ‘‘2010 or in
Fiscal Year 2012, unless’’ in its place.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
5. Amend section 52.204–8 by
revising the date of the provision to read
‘‘(MAY 2012)’’; and removing from
paragraph (c)(1)(v) ‘‘2008, 2009 or 2010’’
and adding ‘‘2008, 2009, 2010, or 2012’’
in its place.
■
6. Amend section 52.209–10 by
revising the date of the clause; and
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
52.209–10 Prohibition on Contracting with
Inverted Domestic Corporations.
Dated: May 3, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
Prohibition on Contracting with
Inverted Domestic Corporations (MAY
2012)
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR parts 9 and 52 as set
forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 9 and 52 continues to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Exceptions to this prohibition are
located at 9.108–2.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend section 52.212–5 by
revising the date of the clause, and
paragraph (b)(8) to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 9—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
2. Amend section 9.108–2 by—
a. In paragraph (a), revising the first
sentence; and removing from the second
sentence ‘‘2008 and 2009’’ and adding
‘‘2008 through 2010’’ in its place; and
■ b. Adding paragraph (b)(4).
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
52.212–5 Contract Terms and Conditions
Required to Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial Items.
*
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
■
9.108–2
Prohibition.
(a) Section 738 of Division C of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012
(Pub. L. 112–74) prohibits the use of
2012 appropriated funds for contracting
with any foreign incorporated entity
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:26 May 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
*
*
*
*
Contract Terms and Conditions
Required to Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial Items
(MAY 2012)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) 52.209–10, Prohibition on
Contracting with Inverted Domestic
Corporations (MAY 2012) (section 738
of Division C of Pub. L. 112–74, section
740 of Division C of Pub. L. 111–117,
section 743 of Division D of Pub. L.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[FAC 2005–59; FAR Case 2012–012;
Item II; Docket 2012–0012, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM24
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Free
Trade Agreement—Colombia
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Interim rule.
AGENCY:
[Amended]
■
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 9 and
52
Government procurement.
[FR Doc. 2012–11148 Filed 5–9–12; 8:45 am]
48 CFR Parts 25 and 52
■
52.204–8
111–8, and section 745 of Division D of
Pub. L. 110–161).
*
*
*
*
*
Sfmt 4700
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing an interim rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement the United States-Colombia
Trade Promotion Agreement. This Trade
Promotion Agreement is a free trade
agreement that provides for mutually
non-discriminatory treatment of eligible
products and services from Colombia.
DATES: Effective Date: May 15, 2012.
Comment Date: Interested parties
should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat on or before July
9, 2012 to be considered in the
formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by FAC 2005–59, FAR Case
2012–012, by any of the following
methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching ‘‘FAR Case 2012–012’’. Select
the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2012–
012.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2012–
012’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAC 2005–59, FAR Case
2012–012, in all correspondence related
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10MYR2.SGM
10MYR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27547-27548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11148]
[[Page 27547]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 9 and 52
[FAC 2005-59; FAR Case 2012-013; Item I; Docket 2012-0013, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM22
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Prohibition on Contracting With
Inverted Domestic Corporations
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Interim rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing an interim rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement a section of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, that prohibits the award of
contracts using appropriated funds to any foreign incorporated entity
that is treated as an inverted domestic corporation or to any
subsidiary of such entity.
DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2012.
Comment Date: Interested parties should submit written comments to
the Regulatory Secretariat on or before July 9, 2012 to be considered
in the formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by FAC 2005-59, FAR Case 2012-013
by any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching ``FAR Case
2012-013''. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with
``FAR Case 2012-013''. Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit
a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any),
and ``FAR Case 2012-013'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275 First Street NE., 7th
floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAC 2005-59, FAR
Case 2012-013, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal and/or business confidential information
provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-208-4949, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-59, FAR Case 2012-
013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This rule implements section 738 of Division C of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74), which was signed on December
23, 2011. The same Governmentwide restrictions are already incorporated
in the FAR for funds appropriated in Fiscal Years 2008 through 2010,
under FAR Case 2008-009, which published as an interim rule in the
Federal Register at 74 FR 31561 on July 1, 2009, and as a final rule
which published in the Federal Register at 76 FR 31410 on May 31, 2011.
Section 738 of Division C extends to the use of Federal
appropriated funds for Fiscal Year 2012, the prohibition against
contracting with any inverted domestic corporation, as defined at
section 835(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-296, 6
U.S.C. 395(b)) or any subsidiary of such an entity.
An inverted domestic corporation is one that used to be
incorporated in the United States, or used to be a partnership in the
United States, but now is incorporated in a foreign country, or is a
subsidiary whose parent corporation is incorporated in a foreign
country. See the definition of inverted domestic corporation at FAR
9.108-1.
As in past consolidated appropriations acts that prohibited
contracting with inverted domestic corporations, the prohibition does
not apply when using Fiscal Year 2012 funds for a contract entered into
before the date the funds were appropriated (December 23, 2011), or for
any order issued pursuant to such contract. A paragraph has been added
to FAR 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic
Corporations, to refer to the FAR 9.108-2 exceptions to the
prohibition.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense (DoD), the General Services
Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) do not expect this rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because this rule will only impact an offeror that is an inverted
domestic corporation and wants to do business with the Government. It
is expected that the number of entities impacted by this rule will be
minimal. Small business concerns are unlikely to have been incorporated
in the United States and then reincorporated in a tax haven; the major
players in these transactions are reportedly the very large
multinational corporations. No domestic entities will be impacted by
this rule. For the definition of ``small business,'' the Regulatory
Flexibility Act refers to the Small Business Act, which in turn allows
the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Administrator to specify
detailed definitions or standards (5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C.
632(a)). The SBA regulations at 13 CFR 121.105 discuss who is a small
business: ``(a)(1) Except for small agricultural cooperatives, a
business concern eligible for assistance from SBA as a small business
is a business entity organized for profit, with a place of business
located in the United States, and which operates primarily within the
United States or which makes a significant contribution to the U.S.
economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials
or labor.'' Therefore, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has
not been performed. DoD, GSA, and NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact
of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by the rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C 610 (FAR Case 2012-013), in
correspondence.
[[Page 27548]]
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
V. Determination To Issue an Interim Rule
A determination has been made under the authority of the Secretary
of Defense (DoD), the Administrator of General Services (GSA), and the
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) that urgent and compelling reasons exist to promulgate this
interim rule without prior opportunity for public comment. This action
is necessary because it implements section 738 of Division C of Public
Law 112-74, which went into effect on December 23, 2011. Contracting
officers who violate this prohibition may be subject to prosecution for
violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act. However, pursuant to 41 U.S.C.
1707 and FAR 1.501-3(b), DoD, GSA, and NASA will consider public
comments received in response to this interim rule in the formation of
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 9 and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 3, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 9 and 52 as set
forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 9 and 52 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 9--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
0
2. Amend section 9.108-2 by--
0
a. In paragraph (a), revising the first sentence; and removing from the
second sentence ``2008 and 2009'' and adding ``2008 through 2010'' in
its place; and
0
b. Adding paragraph (b)(4).
The revised and added text reads as follows:
9.108-2 Prohibition.
(a) Section 738 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74) prohibits the use of 2012 appropriated funds
for contracting with any foreign incorporated entity that is treated as
an inverted domestic corporation, or with a subsidiary of such a
corporation. * * *
(b) * * *
(4) When using Fiscal Year 2012 funds for any contract entered into
before December 23, 2011, or for any order issued pursuant to such
contract.
9.108-3 [Amended]
0
3. Amend section 9.108-3 by removing from paragraph (a) ``funds, an''
and adding ``funds or Fiscal Year 2012 funds, an'' in its place.
9.108-5 [Amended]
0
4. Amend section 9.108-5 by removing from the introductory text ``2010,
unless'' and adding ``2010 or in Fiscal Year 2012, unless'' in its
place.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.204-8 [Amended]
0
5. Amend section 52.204-8 by revising the date of the provision to read
``(MAY 2012)''; and removing from paragraph (c)(1)(v) ``2008, 2009 or
2010'' and adding ``2008, 2009, 2010, or 2012'' in its place.
0
6. Amend section 52.209-10 by revising the date of the clause; and
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic
Corporations.
* * * * *
Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (MAY
2012)
* * * * *
(c) Exceptions to this prohibition are located at 9.108-2.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend section 52.212-5 by revising the date of the clause, and
paragraph (b)(8) to read as follows:
52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes
or Executive Orders--Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders--Commercial Items (MAY 2012)
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic
Corporations (MAY 2012) (section 738 of Division C of Pub. L. 112-74,
section 740 of Division C of Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Division D
of Pub. L. 111-8, and section 745 of Division D of Pub. L. 110-161).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-11148 Filed 5-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P