Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Low-Energy Marine Geophysical Survey in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean, May, 2012, 27189-27202 [2012-11207]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
Superintendent by keeping him or her
informed about issues of concern
throughout the Sanctuary, offering
recommendations on specific issues,
and aiding the Superintendent in
achieving the goals of the National
Marine Sanctuary Program. Specifically,
the Council’s objectives are to provide
advice on: (1) Protecting natural and
cultural resources and identifying and
evaluating emergent or critical issues
involving Sanctuary use or resources;
(2) Identifying and realizing the
Sanctuary’s research objectives; (3)
Identifying and realizing educational
opportunities to increase the public
knowledge and stewardship of the
Sanctuary environment; and (4)
Assisting to develop an informed
constituency to increase awareness and
understanding of the purpose and value
of the Sanctuary and the National
Marine Sanctuary Program.
ADDRESSES:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431, et seq.
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program)
Background
Dated: April 26, 2012.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–11031 Filed 5–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA961
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Low-Energy
Marine Geophysical Survey in the
South-Eastern Pacific Ocean, May,
2012
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an Incidental
Take Authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulation, notification is
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography (SIO) to take marine
mammals, by Level B harassment,
incidental to conducting a low-energy
marine geophysical (i.e., seismic) survey
in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean, May,
2012.
DATES: Effective May 4, 2012 through
June 29, 2012.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
A copy of the final IHA and
application are available by writing to
Tammy Adams, Acting Chief, Permits
and Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 or by
telephoning the contacts listed here.
A copy of the IHA application
containing a list of the references used
in this document may be obtained by
writing to the above address,
telephoning the contact listed here (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or
visiting the Internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard Goldstein or Jolie Harrison,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
301–427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
(16 U.S.C. 1371 (a)(5)(D)) directs the
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
authorize, upon request, the incidental,
but not intentional, taking of small
numbers of marine mammals of a
species or population stock, by United
States citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and, if the
taking is limited to harassment, a notice
of a proposed authorization is provided
to the public for review.
Authorization for the incidental
taking of small numbers of marine
mammals shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant). The
authorization must set forth the
permissible methods of taking, other
means of effecting the least practicable
impact on the species or stock and its
habitat, and requirements pertaining to
the mitigation, monitoring and reporting
of such takings. NMFS has defined
‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103
as ‘‘* * * an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27189
establishes a 45-day time limit for
NMFS’s review of an application
followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of small numbers of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the public comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny the
authorization.
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].
The National Science Foundation
(NSF) has prepared a ‘‘National
Environmental Policy Act Analysis
Pursuant to Executive Order 12114 of a
Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V
Melville in the South-Eastern Pacific
Ocean May 2012.’’ The analysis
incorporates an ‘‘Final Environmental
Analysis of a Marine Geophysical
Survey by the R/V Melville in the SouthEastern Pacific Ocean off Chile, May
2012,’’ prepared by LGL Ltd.,
Environmental Research Associates
(LGL), on behalf of NSF and SIO, which
is also available at the same internet
address. To meet NMFS’s NEPA
requirements for the issuance of an IHA
to SIO, NMFS prepared an
‘‘Environmental Assessment on the
Issuance of an Incidental Harassment
Authorization to the Scripps Institution
of Oceanography to Take Marine
Mammals by Harassment Incidental to a
Marine Geophysical Survey in the
South-Eastern Pacific Ocean, May,
2012.’’ NMFS also issued a Biological
Opinion (BiOp) under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) to
evaluate the effects of the survey and
IHA on marine species listed as
threatened or endangered. The NMFS
BiOp will be available online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/consultations/
opinions.htm. Documents cited in this
notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the
aforementioned address.
Summary of Request
NMFS received an application on
December 23, 2011, from SIO for the
taking by harassment, of marine
mammals, incidental to conducting a
low-energy marine seismic survey in the
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
27190
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
south-eastern Pacific Ocean. SIO, a part
of the University of California San
Diego, with research funding from the
NSF, plans to conduct a low-energy
seismic survey in the South-Eastern
Pacific Ocean off the coast of Chile
during May, 2012, for approximately
five to 11 days. The survey will use a
pair of Generator Injector (GI) airguns
each with a discharge volume of 45 or
105 cubic inches (in3) (maximum total
volume of 210 in3) . SIO plans to
conduct the survey from approximately
May 4 to 18, 2012. The seismic survey
will be conducted in the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) of Chile. On
behalf of SIO, the U.S. State Department
will seek authorization from Chile for
clearance to work in its EEZ. On March
13, 2012, NMFS published a notice in
the Federal Register (77 FR 14744)
making preliminary determinations and
proposing to issue an IHA. The notice
initiated a 30 day public comment
period.
SIO plans to use one source vessel,
the R/V Melville (Melville) and a seismic
airgun array to collect seismic reflection
and refraction profiles to monitor the
post-seismic response of the outer
acretionary prism, the area where
sediments are accreted onto the nonsubducting tectonic plate at the
convergent plate boundary off of the
coast of Chile. In addition to the
operations of the seismic airgun array,
SIO intends to operate a multibeam
echosounder (MBES) and a sub-bottom
profiler (SBP) continuously throughout
the survey.
Acoustic stimuli (i.e., increased
underwater sound) generated during the
operation of the seismic airgun array
may have the potential to cause a shortterm behavioral disturbance for marine
mammals in the survey area. This is the
principal means of marine mammal
taking associated with these activities
and SIO has requested an authorization
to take 20 species of marine mammals
by Level B harassment. Take is not
expected to result from the use of the
MBES or SBP, for reasons discussed in
this notice; nor is take expected to result
from collision with the vessel because it
is a single vessel moving at a relatively
slow speed during seismic acquisition
within the survey, for a relatively short
period of time (approximately five to 11
days). It is likely that any marine
mammal would be able to avoid the
vessel.
Description of the Specified Activity
SIO’s planned seismic survey in the
south-eastern Pacific Ocean will take
place for approximately 5 to 11 days in
May, 2012 (see Figure 1 of the IHA
application). The seismic survey will
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
take place in water depths ranging from
approximately 1,000 to 5,300 meters (m)
(3,280.8 to 17,388.5 feet [ft]) and the
program will consist of approximately
1,145 kilometers (km) (618.3 nautical
miles [nmi]) of seismic survey tracklines
(see Figure 1 of the IHA application).
The survey will take place in the area
approximately 34° to 36° South, 72° to
74° West, off the coast of Chile. The
project is scheduled to occur from
approximately May 4 to 18, 2012. Some
minor deviation from these dates is
possible, depending on logistics and
weather.
The survey will involve one source
vessel, the Melville. For the seismic
component of the research program, the
Melville will deploy an array of two
low-energy Sercel Generator Injector
(GI) airguns as an energy source (each
with a discharge volume of 45 or 105
in3, maximum total volume 210 in3) at
a tow depth of 2 m (6.6 ft). The acoustic
receiving system will consist of a 200 to
800 m (656.2 to 2,624.7 ft) hydrophone
streamer with up to 48 channels with
12.5 m (41 ft) channel spacing, and
broadband Ocean Bottom Seismometers
(OBSs). The energy to the airguns is
compressed air supplied by compressors
on board the source vessel. As the
airgun is towed along the survey lines,
the hydrophone streamer will receive
the returning acoustic signals and
transfer the data to the on-board
processing system. The OBSs acquire
the signal, process the data, and log it
internally until the instrument is
retrieved and the data is recovered.
SIO plans to use conventional lowenergy seismic methodology to monitor
the post-seismic response of the outer
accretionary prism, the area where
sediments are accreted onto the nonsubducting tectonic plate at the
convergent plate boundary. To provide
constraints on the fault structure and
seismic stratigraphy in the accretionary
wedge, high resolution seismic data will
be acquired using two GI airguns shot
simultaneously. Simultaneous shots
from both airguns will provide
penetration to basement in the trench
and clearly define fault structures and
folds in the slop basin sediments that
overlie the accretionary complex. The
primary tracklines, approximately 569
km (307.2 nmi), identified in Figure 1 of
the IHA application, will be surveyed
first. Depending on the weather, quality
and at sea conditions, efforts will be
made to survey the secondary
tracklines, approximately 576 km (311
nmi), identified in Figure 1 of the IHA
application. During the survey OBSs
will be deployed and survey profiles
will be taken along the tracklines that
extend from the trench across the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accretionary complex to the region of
greatest slip. These data will be
processed onboard the vessel and will
be used to optimize the location of
remaining profiles to be collected
within the survey site area. In addition
to the operations of the airgun array, a
MBES and SBP will also be operated
from the Melville continuously
throughout the cruise. There will be
additional seismic operations associated
with equipment testing, start-up, and
possible line changes or repeat coverage
of any areas where initial data quality is
sub-standard. In SIO’s calculations, 25%
has been added for those contingency
operations.
All planned geophysical data
acquisition activities will be conducted
by technicians provided by SIO, with
on-board assistance by the scientists
who have planned the study. The
Principal Investigator (PI) is Dr. Anne
Trehu of Oregon State University. The
vessel will be self-contained, and the
crew will live aboard the vessel for the
entire cruise.
Description of the Dates, Duration, and
Specified Geographic Region
The Melville is expected to depart and
return to Bahia de Valparaiso, Chile.
The cruise is scheduled to occur for
approximately 5 to 11 days from May 4
to 18, 2012. Of the approximately 15
day cruise, approximately five days will
be spent collecting seismic data along
the primary tracklines, with potential
for an additional six days of seismic
data acquisition along the secondary
tracklines, barring weather or
instrument related issues. Remaining
cruise time will be spent transiting to
and from port. Some minor deviation
from this schedule is possible,
depending on logistics and weather. The
survey will occur in the area
approximately 34° to 35° South,
approximately 72° to 74° West (see
Figure 1 of the IHA application). Water
depths in the survey area generally
range from approximately 1,000 to 5,300
m (3,280.8 to 17,388.5 ft). The seismic
survey will be conducted in the EEZ of
Chile, approximately 50 km (27 nmi) off
the coast of Chile.
NMFS outlined the purpose of the
program in a previous notice for the
proposed IHA (77 FR 14744, March 13,
2012). The activities to be conducted
have not changed between the proposed
IHA notice and this final notice
announcing the issuance of the IHA. For
a more detailed description of the
authorized action, including vessel and
acoustic source specifications, the
reader should refer to the proposed IHA
notice (77 FR 14744, March 13, 2012),
the IHA application, EA, and associated
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
documents referenced above this
section.
Comments and Responses
A notice of proposed IHA for the SIO
seismic survey was published in the
Federal Register on March 13, 2012 (77
FR 14744). During the 30 day public
comment period, NMFS received
comments from the Marine Mammal
Commission (Commission). The
Commission’s comments are online at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm. Following are their
substantive comments and NMFS’s
response:
Comment 1: The Commission
recommends that NMFS require SIO to
re-estimate exclusion zones (EZ) and
buffer zones for the two airgun array
and associated number of marine
mammal takes using operational and
site-specific environmental
parameters—if the EZs and buffer zones
and number of takes are not reestimated; and require SIO to provide a
detailed justification for basing the EZs
and buffer zones for the proposed
survey in the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean on modeling that relies on
measurements from the Gulf of Mexico
(GOM). The Commission would like an
opportunity to evaluate the detailed
justification prior to issuance of the
authorization.
Response: With respect to the
Commission’s first point, based upon
the best available information and
NMFS’ analysis of the likely effects of
the specified activity on marine
mammals and their habitat, NMFS is
satisfied that the data supplied by SIO
are sufficient for NMFS to conduct its
analysis and support the determinations
under the MMPA, Endangered Species
Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), and the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). The identified zones
are appropriate for the survey and
additional field measurements are not
necessary at this time. Thus, for this
survey, NMFS will not require SIO to reestimate the proposed exclusion zones
(EZs) and buffer zones and associated
number of marine mammal takes using
operational and site-specific
environmental parameters.
With respect to the Commission’s
second point, SIO has modeled the EZ
and buffer zones in the action area
based on L–DEO’s 2003 (Tolstoy et al.,
2004) and 2007–2008 (Tolstoy et al.,
2009) peer-reviewed, calibration studies
in the northern Gulf of Mexico.
Received levels have been modeled by
L–DEO for a number of airgun
configurations, including two 105 in3 GI
airguns, in relation to distance and
direction from the airguns (see Figure 2a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
and 2b of the IHA application). NSF’s
environmental analysis (see Appendix
A) includes detailed information on the
study, their modeling process, and a
comparison of SIO’s modeled results
with results of the 2007 to 2008 Marcus
G. Langseth calibration experiment in
shallow, intermediate, and deep water.
The conclusions in Appendix A show
that SIO’s model represents the actual
produced sound levels, particularly
within the first few kms, where the
predicted zone (i.e., EZ) lie. At greater
distances, local oceanographic
variations begin to take effect, and the
model tends to over predict.
Because the modeling matches the
observed measurement data, the authors
concluded that those using the models
to predict zones can continue to do so,
including predicting EZs and buffer
zones around the vessel for various tow
depths. At present, L–DEO’s model does
not account for site-specific
environmental conditions and the
calibration study analysis of the model
predicted that using site-specific
information may actually estimate less
conservative EZs at greater distances.
While it is difficult to estimate
exposures of marine mammals to
acoustic stimuli, NMFS is confident that
SIO’s approach to quantifying the EZs
and buffer zones uses the best available
scientific information and estimation
methodologies. After considering this
commend and evaluating the respective
approaches for establishing EZs and
buffer zones, NMFS had determined
that SIO’s approach and corresponding
monitoring and mitigation measures
will effect the least practicable impact
on affected marine mammal species or
stocks.
Comment 2: The Commission
recommends that NMFS, before issuing
the requested IHA, (1) use speciesspecific maximum densities derived by
multiplying the best density estimates
by a precautionary correction factor and
(2) re-estimate the anticipated number
of takes using that precautionary
approach.
Response: For purposes of this IHA,
NMFS is using the estimated densities
provided in the applicant’s application
to estimate the number of authorized
takes for SIO’s seismic survey in the
south-eastern Pacific Ocean as NMFS is
confident in the assumptions and
calculations used to estimate density for
this survey area. SIO used reported
densities from five sources (i.e., Read et
al., 2009; Ferguson and Barlow, 2003;
Shiavini et al., 1999; Heinrich, 2006;
and Galletti-Vernazzani and Cabrera,
2009) that included habitat modeling for
estimating cetacean densities based on
numerous surveys in the eastern
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27191
tropical Pacific for 11 cetacean species
as well as a correction factor (0.5) for
estimated densities from regional aerial
and/or vessel surveys near the action
area for dusky and Chilean dolphins as
well as blue whales. Estimated densities
that were obtained or assigned to each
cetacean species have been corrected for
both detectability and availability bias
by the authors. SIO’s use of these peerreviewed, model-based, density
estimates are the best available
information to estimate density for the
survey area and to estimate the number
of authorized takes for the seismic
survey in the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean. The results of the associated
monitoring reports show that the past
use of the best estimates was
appropriate and has not refuted NMFS’s
past determinations.
Comment 3: The Commission
recommends that, before issuing the
requested IHA, NMFS prohibit the use
of a 15 minute pause (i.e., extended
shut-down) following the sighting of a
mysticete or large odontocete in the
exclusion zone and extend that pause to
cover the maximum dive times of the
species likely to be encountered prior to
initiating ramp-up procedures.
Response: NMFS would like to clarify
the Commission’s understanding of two
conditions within the IHA—one related
to turning on the airguns (ramp-up) after
a shut-down due to a marine mammal
sighting about to enter or within the EZ,
and the other related to a ramp-up after
an extended shut-down (i.e., the 15
minute pause due to equipment failure
or routine maintenance).
To clarify, the IHA requires the
Melville to shut-down the airguns when
a Protected Species Observer (PSO) sees
a marine mammal within, approaching,
or entering the relevant EZs for
cetaceans or for pinnipeds. Following a
shut-down, the Melville would only
ramp-up the airguns if a marine
mammal had exited the EZ or if the PSO
had not seen the animals within the
relevant EZ for 15 minutes for species
with shorter dive times (i.e., small
odontocetes and pinnipeds) or 30
minutes for species with longer dive
durations (i.e., mysticetes and large
odontocetes, including sperm, pygmy
sperm, dwarf sperm, killer, and beaked
whales).
NMFS believes that 30 minutes is an
adequate length for the monitoring
period prior to the ramp-up of the
airgun array after sighting a mysticete or
large odontocete for the following
reasons:
• The Melville can transit roughly 5
knots; the ship would move 2.3 km
(1.25 nmi) in 15 minutes or 4.6 km (2.5
nmi) in 30 minutes. At this distance, the
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
27192
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
vessel will have moved 65.7 times (4.6
km/0.07 km) away from the distance of
the original 180 dB EZ (70 m [229.7 ft]
for two 105 in3 airguns) from the initial
sighting. The vessel will have moved
115 times (4.6 km/0.04 km) away from
the distance of the 180 dB EZ (40 m
[131.2 ft] for the two 45 in3 GI airguns)
from the initial sighting.
• The relevant EZs for cetaceans and
pinnipeds are relatively small (i.e., 70 m
for cetaceans and 20 m [65.6 ft] for
pinnipeds for the two 105 in3 GI
airguns, and 40 m for cetaceans and 10
m [32.8 ft] for pinnipeds for the two 45
in3 GI airguns). Extending the
monitoring period for a relatively small
EZ would not meaningfully increase the
effectiveness of observing marine
mammals approaching or entering the
EZ for the full source level and would
not further minimize the potential for
take.
• Because a significant part of their
movement is vertical (deep-diving), it is
unlikely that a submerged mysticete or
large odontocete would move in the
same direction and speed (roughly 5
knots) with the vessel for 30 minutes. If
a mysticete or large odontocete’s
maximum underwater dive time is 45
minutes, then there is only a one in
three chance that the last random
surfacing could occur within the 70 or
40 m EZ.
• The PSOs are constantly monitoring
the horizon and the EZs during the 30
minute period. On average, PSOs can
observe to the horizon (10 km; 5.4 nmi)
from the height of the Melville’s
observation deck and should be able to
say with a reasonable degree of
confidence whether a marine mammal
would be encountered within this
distance before resuming the two GI
airgun operations at full power.
Next, NMFS intends to clarify the
monitoring period associated with an
extended shut-down (i.e., the 15 minute
pause due to equipment failure or
routine maintenance). During active
seismic operations, there are occasions
when the Melville crew will need to
temporarily shut-down the airguns due
to equipment failure or for maintenance.
Thus, an extended shut-down is not
related to PSO detecting a marine
mammal within, approaching, or
entering the relevant EZs. However, the
PSOs are still actively monitoring the
relevant EZs for cetaceans and
pinnipeds.
In conclusion, NMFS has designed
monitoring and mitigation measures to
comply with the requirement that
incidental take authorizations must
include means of effecting the least
practicable impact on marine mammal
species and their habitat. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
effectiveness of monitoring is sciencebased, and monitoring and mitigation
measures must be ‘‘practicable.’’ NMFS
believes that the framework for visual
monitoring will: (1) Be effective at
spotting almost all species for which
SIO has requested take, and (2) that
imposing additional requirements, such
as those suggested by the Commission,
would not meaningfully increase the
effectiveness of observing marine
mammals approaching or entering the
EZs and thus further minimize the
potential for take.
In the case of an extended shut-down,
due to equipment failure or routine
maintenance, the Melville’s crew will
turn on the airguns and follow the
mitigation and monitoring procedures
for a ramp-up after a period of 15
minutes. Again, the PSOs will monitor
the full EZs for marine mammals and
will implement a shut-down, if
necessary. After considering this
comment and evaluating the monitoring
and mitigation requirements to be
included in the IHA, NMFS has
determined that SIO’s approach and
corresponding monitoring and
mitigation measures will effect the least
practicable impact on affected marine
mammal species or stocks.
Comment 4: The Commission
recommends that NMFS work with the
NSF to analyze the data collected during
ramp-up procedures to help determine
the effectiveness of those procedures as
a mitigation measure for geophysical
surveys.
Response: NMFS acknowledges the
Commission’s request for an analysis of
ramp-ups and will work with NSF and
SIO to help identify the effectiveness of
the mitigation measure for seismic
surveys. The IHA requires that PSOs on
the Melville make observations for 30
minutes prior to ramp-up, during all
ramp-ups, and during all daytime
seismic operations and record the
following information when a marine
mammal is sighted:
(i) Species, group size, age/size/sex
categories (if determinable), behavior
when first sighted and after initial
sighting, heading (if consistent), bearing
and distance from the seismic vessel,
sighting cue, apparent reaction of the
airguns or vessel (e.g., none, avoidance,
approach, paralleling, etc., and
including responses to ramp-up), and
behavioral pace; and
(ii) Time, location, heading, speed,
activity of the vessel (including number
of airguns operating and whether in
state of ramp-up or shut-down),
Beaufort wind force and sea state,
visibility, and sun glare.
One of the primary purposes of
monitoring is to result in ‘‘increased
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
knowledge of the species’’ and the
effectiveness of required monitoring and
mitigation measures; the effectiveness of
ramp-up as a mitigation measure and
marine mammal reaction to ramp-up
would be useful information in this
regard. NMFS requires NSF and SIO to
gather all data that could potentially
provide information regarding the
effectiveness of ramp-up as a mitigation
measure in its monitoring report.
However, considering the low numbers
of marine mammal sightings and low
number of ramp-ups it is unlikely that
the information will result in any
statistically robust conclusions for this
particular seismic survey. Over the long
term, these requirements may provide
information regarding the effectiveness
of ramp-up as a mitigation measure,
provided PSOs detect animals during
ramp-up.
Description of the Marine Mammals
in the Specified Geographic Area of the
Specified Activity
Thirty-two marine mammal species
could occur in the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean survey area. Twenty-eight
cetacean species (22 odontocetes and 6
mysticetes) and four pinniped species
could occur in the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean study area. Several of these
species are listed as endangered under
the U.S. Endangered Species Act of
1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
including the humpback (Megaptera
novaeangliae), sei (Balaenoptera
borealis), fin (Balaenoptera physalus),
blue (Balaenoptera musculus), and
sperm (Physeter macrocephalus) whale.
An additional 12 cetacean species,
although present in the wider southeastern Pacific Ocean, likely would not
be found in the proposed seismic survey
area because their ranges in the survey
area are extralimital, or they are
typically found in coastal water.
Southern right whales (Eubalaena
australis) are listed as endangered under
the ESA. Sightings are seen on rare
occasions off the coasts of Peru and
Chile (Aguayo et al., 1992; Santillan et
al., 2004), although females with calves
have been observed between June and
October. Given the size of this
population, estimated at 50 individuals,
in Chile and Peru (IWC, 2007; ICW,
2007b) and the rarity of the species in
the survey area, it is unlikely that
individuals from this subpopulation
will be encountered. Pygmy right
whales (Caperea marginata) are rarely
seen at sea, but are known from
stranding records off Chile (Cabrera et
al., 2005). Little is known about
Arnoux’s beaked whale (Berardius
arnuxii) as they are rarely seen, but
typically they are found between the
Antarctic continent and 34° South. The
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
northernmost limit of their range
overlaps with the survey area, but no
records of their occurrence exist within
the survey area. The spade toothed
beaked whale (Mesoplodon traversii)
and Shepherd’s beaked whale
(Tasmacetus shepherdi) are uncommon
species, but individuals have been
described from stranding records in the
Juan Fernandez Archipelago in Chile
(Reyes et al., 1996) approximately 700
km (378 nmi) west of the survey site.
The ginkgo-toothed beaked whale
(Mesoplodon ginkgodens), pygmy
beaked whale (Mesoplodon peruvianus),
and the long-beaked common dolphin
(Delphinus capensis) are likely
extralimital with distributions mostly
north of the survey area. The
Commerson’s dolphin
(Cephalorhynchus commersonii),
hourglass dolphin (Lagenorhynchus
cruciger), and southern bottlenose
whale (Hyperoodon planifrons) are also
extralimital in the survey area, but have
a northernmost extent that is south of
the survey area.
No cetacean distribution and
abundance studies have been conducted
in the survey area. The closest
distribution studies have been in the
Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) and
Patagonia, in southern Chile. Several
other studies of marine mammal
distribution and abundance have been
conducted in the wider ETP. The most
extensive regional distribution and
abundance data come primarily from
multi-year vessel surveys conducted by
NMFS’s Southwest Fisheries Science
Center (SWFSC). The surveys were
conducted during July to December in
27193
an area generally extending from 30°
North to 18° South from the coastline to
153° West (Wade and Gerrodette, 1993;
Ferguson and Barlow, 2001; Gerrodette
et al., 2008; and Jackson et al., 2008).
The marine mammals that occur in
the survey area belong to three
taxonomic groups: odontocetes (toothed
whales and dolphins), mysticetes
(baleen whales), and pinnipeds (seals,
sea lions, and walrus). Cetaceans and
pinnipeds are the subject of the IHA
application to NMFS.
Table 1 (below) presents information
on the abundance, distribution,
population status, conservation status,
and density of the marine mammals that
may occur in the survey area during
May, 2012.
TABLE 1—THE HABITAT, REGIONAL ABUNDANCE, AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF MARINE MAMMALS THAT MAY OCCUR
IN OR NEAR THE SEISMIC SURVEY AREA IN THE SOUTH-EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN
[See text and Tables 2 to 3 in SIO’s application for further details]
Species
Habitat
Abundance
ESA 1
MMPA 2
Density
(#/1,000 km2) 3
Mysticetes
Humpback
whale
novaeangliae).
(Megaptera
Minke
whale
(Balaenoptera
acutorostrata).
Bryde’s whale (Balaenoptera edeni) ...
Sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis) ......
Fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) ....
Blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus)
Mainly nearshore
waters and
banks.
Coastal .................
6 2,900 ..................
(SE Pacific) ..........
EN ........................
D ............................
4 0.8
7 338,000
..............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
4 0.8
Pelagic and coastal.
Mostly pelagic ......
Slope, mostly pelagic.
Pelagic and coastal.
130,008 ................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
0.96
8 11,000
................
................
EN ........................
EN ........................
D ............................
D ............................
5 0.01
9 15,178
10 1,415
.................
EN ........................
D ............................
2.44
EN ........................
D ............................
3.95
5 0.01
Odontocetes
Sperm
whale
macrocephalus).
(Physeter
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pygmy
sperm
whale
(Kogia
breviceps).
Dwarf sperm whale (Kogia sima) .......
Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius
cavirostris).
Blainville’s
beaked
whale
(Mesoplodon densirostris).
Gray’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon
grayi).
Hector’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon
hectori).
Strap-toothed
beaked
whale
(Mesoplodon layardii).
Unidentified Mesoplodon spp. ............
Rough-toothed
dolphin
(Steno
bredanensis).
Bottlenose
dolphin
(Tursiops
truncatus).
Spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris)
Striped
dolphin
coeruleoalba).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
(Stenella
15:44 May 08, 2012
Usually deep pelagic, steep topography.
Deep waters off
shelf.
Deep waters off
shelf.
Slope and pelagic
11 26,053
...............
12 150,000
.............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
0.03
12 150,000
.............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
0.03
13 20,000
...............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
0.80
Slope and pelagic
14 25,300
...............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
0.80
Slope and pelagic
NA ........................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NA
Slope and pelagic
NA ........................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NA
Slope and pelagic
NA ........................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NA
Slope and pelagic
Mainly pelagic ......
NA ........................
107,633 ................
NL .........................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NC ..........................
0.36
4.19
Coastal, shelf, pelagic.
335,834 ................
NL .........................
17.06
Coastal and pelagic.
Off continental
shelf.
1,797,716 .............
NL .........................
NC; D—Western
North Atlantic
coastal.
NC ..........................
964,362 ................
NL .........................
NC; D—Eastern .....
67.80
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
35.70
27194
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
TABLE 1—THE HABITAT, REGIONAL ABUNDANCE, AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF MARINE MAMMALS THAT MAY OCCUR
IN OR NEAR THE SEISMIC SURVEY AREA IN THE SOUTH-EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
[See text and Tables 2 to 3 in SIO’s application for further details]
Density
(#/1,000 km2) 3
Species
Habitat
Abundance
ESA 1
MMPA 2
Short-beaked
common
dolphin
(Delphinus delphis).
Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus) .....
Shelf, pelagic, high
relief.
Shelf, slope,
seamounts.
Pelagic ..................
3,127,203 .............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
110.90
110,457 ................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
10.21
398,009 ................
NC ..........................
0.39
Killer whale (Orcinus orca) .................
Widely distributed
15 8,500
NL; Proposed
EN—insular Hawaiian.
NL; EN—Southern
resident.
0.85
Long-finned pilot whale (Globicephala
melas).
Peale’s dolphin (Lagenorhynchus
australis).
Dusky dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obscures).
Southern
right
whale
dolphin
(Lissodelphis peronni).
Chilean dolphin (Cephalorhynchus
eutropia).
Burmeister’s porpoise (Phocoena
spinipinnis).
Shelf and pelagic
16 200,000
.............
NL .........................
NC; D—Southern
resident, AT1
transient.
NC ..........................
11.88
Coastal and shelf
NA ........................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
4 0.8
Shelf and slope ....
17 7,252
.................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
37
Pelagic ..................
NA ........................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
5 0.01
Coastal and shelf
18 <
10,000 ...........
NL .........................
NC ..........................
11.11
Coastal .................
NA ........................
NL .........................
NC ..........................
5 0.01
False
killer
crassidens).
whale
(Pseudorca
.................
Pinnipeds
South American fur seal (Otaria
flavescens).
Juan
Fernandez
fur
seal
(Arctocephalus philippii).
South
American
sea
lion
(Arctocephalus australis).
Southern elephant seal (Mirounga
leonina).
Coastal and shelf
19 30,000
...............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NA
Coastal and shelf
20 12,000
...............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NA
Coastal and shelf
21 150,000
.............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NA
Coastal and pelagic.
22 650,000
.............
NL .........................
NC ..........................
NA
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
N.A. = Not available or not assessed.
1 U.S. Endangered Species Act: EN = Endangered, T = Threatened, NL = Not listed.
2 U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act: D = Depleted, NC = Not Classified.
3 Densities of other species (e.g., pinnipeds) presumably would b lower than the lowest density in Table 3 of the application.
4 Densities assigned an arbitrary density similar to densities reported for species that are uncommon in the survey area.
5 Densities assigned an arbitrarily low number for rare species with unconfirmed sightings in the survey area.
6 Southeast Pacific (Felix et al., 2005)
7 Estimated from Antarctic and common minke whales in South Pacific (Reilly, 2011).
8 Based on 2007 projection for southern hemisphere (IWC, 1996).
9 Based on 2007 projection for southern hemisphere (Reilly, 2011).
10 ETP (Wade and Gerrodette, 1993) excluded nursing area south of study area estimated at approximately 267 animals.
11 Eastern temperate North Pacific (Whitehead, 2002).
12 This abundance estimate is for Kogia sima and Kogia breviceps in ETP (Ferguson and Barlow, 2001).
13 ETP (Wade and Gerrodette, 1993).
14 This estimate includes all species of the genus Mesoplodon in the ETP (Ferguson and Barlow, 2001).
15 ETP (Ford, 2002).
16 Southern hemisphere population (Waring et al., 1997).
17 Patagonian coast population (Dans et al., 1997).
18 South-Eastern Pacific (Reeves et al., 2008).
19 Chile (Arias, Shreiber, and Rivas, 1998).
20 Juan Fernandez Archipelago population (Aurioles and Trillmich, 2008).
21 Peru and Chile (Campagna, 2008a).
22 Southern hemisphere (Campagna, 2009).
Refer to Section III and IV of SIO’s
application for detailed information
regarding the abundance and
distribution, population status, and life
history and behavior of these species
and their occurrence in the project area.
The application also presents how SIO
calculated the estimated densities for
the marine mammals in the survey area.
NMFS has reviewed these data and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
determined them to be the best available
scientific information for the purposes
of the IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
Acoustic stimuli generated by the
operation of the airguns, which
introduce sound into the marine
environment, may have the potential to
cause Level B harassment of marine
mammals in the survey area. The effects
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of sounds from airgun operations might
include one or more of the following:
Tolerance, masking of natural sounds,
behavioral disturbance, temporary or
permanent hearing impairment, or nonauditory physical or physiological
effects (Richardson et al., 1995; Gordon
et al., 2004; Nowacek et al., 2007;
Southall et al., 2007).
Permanent hearing impairment, in the
unlikely event that it occurred, would
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
constitute injury, but temporary
threshold shift (TTS) is not an injury
(Southall et al., 2007). Although the
possibility cannot be entirely excluded,
it is unlikely that the proposed project
would result in any cases of temporary
or permanent hearing impairment, or
any significant non-auditory physical or
physiological effects. Based on the
available data and studies described
here, some behavioral disturbance is
expected, but NMFS expects the
disturbance to be localized and shortterm.
The notice of the proposed IHA (77
FR 14744, March 13, 2012) included a
discussion of the effects of sounds from
airguns on mysticetes, odontocetes, and
pinnipeds including tolerance, masking,
behavioral disturbance, hearing
impairment, and other non-auditory
physical effects. NMFS refers the reader
to SIO’s application and EA for
additional information on the
behavioral reactions (or lack thereof) by
all types of marine mammals to seismic
vessels.
Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal
Habitat, Fish, Fisheries, and
Invertebrates
NMFS included a detailed discussion
of the potential effects of this action on
marine mammal habitat, including
physiological and behavioral effects on
marine fish, fisheries, and invertebrates
in the notice of the proposed IHA (77 FR
14744, March 13, 2012). The seismic
survey will not result in any permanent
impact on habitats used by the marine
mammals in the proposed survey area,
including the food sources they use (i.e.
fish and invertebrates), and there will be
no physical damage to any habitat.
While NMFS anticipates that the
specified activity may result in marine
mammals avoiding certain areas due to
temporary ensonification, this impact to
habitat is temporary and reversible
which was considered in further detail
in the notice of the proposed IHA (77 FR
14744, March 13, 2012), as behavioral
modification. The main impact
associated with the activity will be
temporarily elevated noise levels and
the associated direct effects on marine
mammals.
Recent work by Andre et al. (2011)
purports to present the first
morphological and ultrastructural
evidence of massive acoustic trauma
(i.e., permanent and substantial
alterations of statocyst sensory hair
cells) in four cephalopod species
subjected to low-frequency sound. The
cephalopods, primarily cuttlefish, were
exposed to continuous 40 to 400 Hz
sinusoidal wave sweeps (100% duty
cycle and 1 s sweep period) for two
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
hours while captive in relatively small
tanks (one 2,000 liter [L, 2 m3] and one
200 L [0.2 m3] tank). The received SPL
was reported as 157±5 dB re 1 mPa, with
peak levels at 175 dB re 1 mPa. As in the
McCauley et al. (2003) paper on sensory
hair cell damage in pink snapper as a
result of exposure to seismic sound, the
cephalopods were subjected to higher
sound levels than they would be under
natural conditions, and they were
unable to swim away from the sound
source.
27195
source level was viewed appropriate.
The location of the survey was informed
and adjusted based on the latest
scientific information on the epicenter
of the February 27, 2010 earthquake;
survey location is critical for collecting
the data for the overall research activity
and meeting research objectives.
To reduce the potential for
disturbance of marine mammals from
acoustic stimuli associated with the
specified activities, the IHA requires
SIO and/or its designees shall
implement the following mitigation
Mitigation
measures:
In order to issue an ITA under section
(1) Exclusion zones;
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA, NMFS must
(2) Speed or course alteration;
(3) Shut-down procedures; and
set forth the permissible methods of
(4) Ramp-up procedures.
taking pursuant to such activity, and
Exclusion Zones—Received sound
other means of effecting the least
levels have been modeled by
practicable adverse impact on such
L–DEO for a number of airgun
species or stock and its habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating configurations, including two 45 or two
105 in3 GI airguns, in relation to
grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and the availability of such distance and direction from the airguns
(see Figure 2a and 2b of the IHA
species or stock for taking for certain
application). The models do not allow
subsistence uses.
for bottom interactions, and are most
SIO has based development and
directly applicable to deep water. Based
evaluation of effectiveness of the
mitigation measures, to be implemented on the modeling, estimates of the
under the IHA for the seismic survey, on maximum distances from the source
where sound levels are predicted to be
the following:
(1) Protocols used during previous
190, 180, and 160 dB re 1 mPa (rms) in
SIO seismic research cruises as
deep water were determined (see Table
approved by NMFS;
2 below).
(2) Previous IHA applications and
Empirical data concerning the 190,
IHAs approved and authorized by
180, and 160 dB (rms) distances were
NMFS; and
acquired for various airgun arrays based
(3) Recommended best practices in
on measurements during the acoustic
Richardson et al. (1995), Pierson et al.
verification studies conducted by
(1998), and Weir and Dolman, (2007).
L–DEO in the northern GOM in 2003
Planning Phase—The PIs worked with (Tolstoy et al., 2004) and 2007 to 2008
SIO and NSF to identify potential time
(Tolstoy et al., 2009). Results of the 36
periods to carry out the survey taking
airgun array are not relevant for the two
into consideration key factors such as
GI airguns to be used in the survey. The
environmental conditions (i.e., the
empirical data for the 6, 10, 12, and 20
seasonal presence of marine mammals), airgun arrays indicate that, for deep
weather conditions, equipment, and
water, the L–DEO model tends to
optimal timing for other proposed
overestimate the received sound levels
seismic surveys using the Melville. Most at a given distance (Tolstoy et al., 2004).
marine mammal species are expected to Measurements were not made for the
occur in the area year-round, so altering two GI airgun array in deep water,
the timing of the proposed survey likely however, SIO proposes to use the EZ
would result in no net benefits for those predicted by L–DEO’s model for the GI
species. Baleen whales are most
airgun operations in deep water,
common south of the survey area
although they are likely conservative
between February and June, whereas
give the empirical results for the other
odontocetes were most commonly
arrays.
observed between October and
The 180 and 190 dB radii are shutNovember. After considering what
down criteria applicable to cetaceans
energy source level was necessary to
and pinnipeds, respectively, as
achieve the research goals, the PIs
specified by NMFS (2000); these levels
determined the use of the two GI airgun were used to establish the EZs. If the
array with a maximum total volume of
PSO detects marine mammal(s) within
210 in3 would be required; however, a
or about to enter the appropriate EZ, the
lower energy source with a total volume airguns will be shut-down immediately.
Table 2 summarizes the predicted
of 90 in3 may be used. Given the
distances at which sound levels (160,
research goals, location of the survey
180, and 190 dB [rms]) are expected to
and associated deep water, this energy
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
27196
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
be received from the two GI airgun array
operating in deep water depths.
TABLE 2—DISTANCES TO WHICH SOUND LEVELS ≥190, 180, AND 160 DB RE 1 μPA (RMS) COULD BE RECEIVED IN DEEP
WATER DURING THE SEISMIC SURVEY IN THE SOUTH-EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN, MAY 2012
[Distances are based on model results provided by L–DEO]
Tow depth
(m)
Source and Volume
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Two GI airguns (105 in3) (210 in3 total) ..................
Two GI airguns (45 in3) (90 in3 total) ......................
Speed or Course Alteration—If a
marine mammal is detected outside the
EZ and, based on its position and the
relative motion, is likely to enter the EZ,
the vessel’s speed and/or direct course
could be changed. This would be done
if operationally practicable while
minimizing the effect on the planned
science objectives. The activities and
movements of the marine mammal
(relative to the seismic vessel) will then
be closely monitored to determine
whether the animal is approaching the
applicable EZ. If the animal appears
likely to enter the EZ, further mitigative
actions will be taken, i.e., either further
course alterations or a shut-down of the
seismic source. Typically, during
seismic operations, the source vessel is
unable to change speed or course and
one or more alternative mitigation
measures will need to be implemented.
Shut-down Procedures—SIO will shut
down the operating airgun(s) if a marine
mammal is seen outside the EZ for the
airgun(s), and if the vessel’s speed and/
or course cannot be changed to avoid
having the animal enter the EZ, the
seismic source will be shut-down before
the animal is within the EZ. If a marine
mammal is already within the EZ when
first detected, the seismic source will be
shut-down immediately.
Following a shut-down, SIO will not
resume airgun activity until the marine
mammal has cleared the EZ. SIO will
consider the animal to have cleared the
EZ if:
• A PSO has visually observed the
animal leave the EZ, or
• A PSO has not sighted the animal
within the EZ for 15 minutes for species
with shorter dive durations (i.e., small
odontocetes or pinnipeds), or 30
minutes for species with longer dive
durations (i.e., mysticetes and large
odontocetes, including sperm, killer,
and beaked whales).
Ramp-up Procedures—SIO will
follow a ramp-up procedure when the
airgun array begins operating after a
specified period without airgun
operations or when a shut-down has
exceeded that period. For the present
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
Water depth
(m)
2
2
Frm 00020
190 dB
Deep (>1,000) ...........
Deep (>1,000 ) ..........
cruise, this period will be
approximately 15 minutes under the
IHA. SIO has used similar periods
(approximately 15 minutes) during
previous SIO surveys.
Ramp-up will begin with a single GI
airgun (45 or 105 in3). The second GI
airgun (45 or 105 in3) will be added after
five minutes. During ramp-up, the PSOs
will monitor the EZ, and if marine
mammals are sighted, SIO will
implement a shut-down as though both
GI airguns were operational.
If the complete EZ has not been
visible for at least 30 minutes prior to
the start of operations in either daylight
or nighttime, SIO will not commence
the ramp-up. If one airgun has operated,
ramp-up to full power will be
permissible at night or in poor visibility,
on the assumption that marine
mammals will be alerted to the
approaching seismic vessel by the
sounds from the single airgun and could
move away if they choose. A ramp-up
from a shut-down may occur at night,
but only where the EZ is small enough
to be visible. SIO will not initiate a
ramp-up of the airguns if a marine
mammal is sighted within or near the
applicable EZs during the day or close
to the vessel at night.
NMFS has carefully evaluated the
applicant’s mitigation measures and has
considered a range of other measures in
the context of ensuring that NMFS
prescribes the means of effecting the
least practicable adverse impact on the
affected marine mammal species and
stocks and their habitat. NMFS’s
evaluation of potential measures
included consideration of the following
factors in relation to one another:
(1) The manner in which, and the
degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure is
expected to minimize adverse impacts
to marine mammals;
(2) The proven or likely efficacy of the
specific measure to minimize adverse
impacts as planned; and
(3) The practicability of the measure
for applicant implementation.
PO 00000
Predicted RMS radii distances (m)
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
180 dB
20
10
160 dB
70
40
670
350
Based on NMFS’s evaluation of the
applicant’s measures, as well as other
measures considered by NMFS or
recommended by the public, NMFS has
determined that the mitigation measures
included in the IHA provide the means
of effecting the least practicable impacts
on marine mammal species or stocks
and their habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds,
and areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an
activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of the
MMPA states that NMFS must set forth
‘‘requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such
taking.’’ The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13)
indicate that requests for IHAs must
include the suggested means of
accomplishing the necessary monitoring
and reporting that will result in
increased knowledge of the species and
of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are
expected to be present in the action
area.
Monitoring
SIO will sponsor marine mammal
monitoring during the present project,
in order to implement the mitigation
measures that require real-time
monitoring, and to satisfy the
anticipated monitoring requirements of
the IHA. SIO’s Monitoring Plan is
described below this section. The
monitoring work described here has
been planned as a self-contained project
independent of any other related
monitoring projects that may be
occurring simultaneously in the same
regions. SIO is prepared to discuss
coordination of its monitoring program
with any related work that might be
done by other groups insofar as this is
practical and desirable.
Vessel-Based Visual Monitoring
SIO’s PSOs will be based aboard the
seismic source vessel and will watch for
marine mammals near the vessel during
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
daytime airgun operations and during
any ramp-ups at night. PSOs will also
watch for marine mammals near the
seismic vessel for at least 30 minutes
prior to the ramp-up of airgun
operations after an extended shut-down
(i.e., greater than approximately 15
minutes for this proposed cruise). When
feasible, PSOs will conduct observations
during daytime periods when the
seismic system is not operating for
comparison of sighting rates and
behavior with and without airgun
operations and between acquisition
periods. Based on PSO observations, the
airguns will be shut-down when marine
mammals are observed within or about
to enter a designated EZ. The EZ is a
region in which a possibility exists of
adverse effects on animal hearing or
other physical effects.
During seismic operations in the
south-eastern Pacific Ocean, three PSOs
will be based aboard the Melville. SIO
will appoint the PSOs with NMFS’s
concurrence. At least one PSO will
monitor the EZs during seismic
operations. Observations will take place
during ongoing daytime operations and
nighttime ramp-ups of the airguns.
PSO(s) will be on duty in shifts of
duration no longer than 4 hr. The vessel
crew will also be instructed to assist in
detecting marine mammals.
The Melville is a suitable platform for
marine mammal observations of
protected species. The primary observer
platform is located one deck below and
forward of the bridge (02 level, 12.46 m
[40.9 ft] above the waterline), affording
relatively unobstructed 180° forward
view. A pair of Big-eye binoculars is
mounted in this location. The open deck
continues along both the port and
starboard sides, and opens up to an aft
deck stretching across the full width of
the vessel. PSOs have views in a full
360° by walking along this deck. In
extremely inclement weather, the PSOs
move on to the bridge (03 level, 15.5 m
[50.6 ft] above the water line). There
they will have a 360° view through the
windows.
During daytime, the PSOs will scan
the area around the vessel
systematically with reticle binoculars
(e.g., 7 x 50 Fujinon), Big-eye binoculars
(25 x 150), optical range finders and
with the naked eye. During darkness,
night vision devices (NVDs) will be
available, when required. The PSOs will
be in wireless communication with the
vessel’s officers on the bridge and
scientists in the vessel’s operations
laboratory, so they can advise promptly
of the need for avoidance maneuvers or
seismic source shut-down. When
marine mammals are detected within or
about to enter the designated EZ, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
airguns will immediately be shut-down.
The PSO(s) will continue to maintain
watch to determine when the animal(s)
are outside the EZ by visual
confirmation. Airgun operations will
not resume until the animal is
confirmed to have left the EZ, or if not
observed after 15 minutes for species
with shorter dive durations (small
odontocetes and pinnipeds) or 30
minutes for species with longer dive
durations (mysticetes and large
odontocetes, including sperm, killer,
and beaked whales).
PSO Data and Documentation
PSOs will record data to estimate the
numbers of marine mammals exposed to
various received sound levels and to
document apparent disturbance
reactions or lack thereof. Data will be
used to estimate numbers of animals
potentially ‘taken’ by harassment (as
defined in the MMPA). They will also
provide information needed to order a
shut-down of the airguns when a marine
mammal is within or near the EZ.
Observations will also be made during
daytime periods when the Melville is
underway without seismic operations
(i.e., transits to, from, and through the
study area) to collect baseline biological
data.
When a sighting is made, the
following information about the sighting
will be recorded:
1. Species, group size, age/size/sex
categories (if determinable), behavior
when first sighted and after initial
sighting, heading (if consistent), bearing
and distance from seismic vessel,
sighting cue, apparent reaction to the
airguns or vessel (e.g., none, avoidance,
approach, paralleling, etc.), and
behavioral pace.
2. Time, location, heading, speed,
activity of the vessel, Beaufort sea state,
visibility, and sun glare.
The data listed under (2) will also be
recorded at the start and end of each
observation watch, and during a watch
whenever there is a change in one or
more of the variables.
All observations as well as
information regarding shut-downs of the
seismic source, will be recorded in a
standardized format. The data accuracy
will be verified by the PSOs at sea, and
preliminary reports will be prepared
during the field program and summaries
forwarded to the operating institution’s
shore facility and to NSF weekly or
more frequently.
Vessel-based observations by the PSO
will provide the following information:
1. The basis for real-time mitigation
(airgun shut-down).
2. Information needed to estimate the
number of marine mammals potentially
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27197
taken by harassment, which must be
reported to NMFS.
3. Data on the occurrence,
distribution, and activities of marine
mammals in the area where the seismic
study is conducted.
4. Information to compare the
distance and distribution of marine
mammals relative to the source vessel at
times with and without seismic activity.
5. Data on the behavior and
movement patterns of marine mammals
seen at times with and without seismic
activity.
SIO will submit a report to NMFS and
NSF within 90 days after the end of the
cruise. The report will describe the
operations that were conducted and
sightings of marine mammals near the
operations. The report will provide full
documentation of methods, results, and
interpretation pertaining to all
monitoring. The 90-day report will
summarize the dates and locations of
seismic operations, and all marine
mammal sightings (dates, times,
locations, activities, associated seismic
survey activities). The report will also
include estimates of the number and
nature of exposures that could result in
potential ‘‘takes’’ of marine mammals by
harassment or in other ways. After the
report is considered final, it will be
publicly available on the NMFS and
NSF Web sites.
In the unanticipated event that the
specified activity clearly causes the take
of a marine mammal in a manner
prohibited by this IHA, such as an
injury (Level A harassment), serious
injury or mortality (e.g., ship-strike, gear
interaction, and/or entanglement), SIO
will immediately cease the specified
activities and immediately report the
incident to the Chief of the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS at 301–427–
8401 and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and
Howard.Goldstein@noaa.gov, and the
NMFS Southwest Regional Stranding
Coordinators (Joe.Cordaro@noaa.gov
and Sarah.Wilkin@noaa.gov). The report
must include the following information:
• Time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident;
• Name and type of vessel involved;
• Vessel’s speed during and leading
up to the incident;
• Description of the incident;
• Status of all sound source use in the
24 hours preceding the incident;
• Water depth;
• Environmental conditions (e.g.,
wind speed and direction, Beaufort sea
state, cloud cover, and visibility);
• Description of all marine mammal
observations in the 24 hours preceding
the incident;
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
27198
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• Species identification or
description of the animal(s) involved;
• Fate of the animal(s); and
• Photographs or video footage of the
animal(s) (if equipment is available).
Activities shall not resume until NMFS
is able to review the circumstances of
the prohibited take. NMFS shall work
with SIO to determine what is necessary
to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA
compliance. SIO may not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS via
letter or email, or telephone.
In the event that SIO discovers an
injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead PSO determines that the cause
of the injury or death is unknown and
the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less
than a moderate state of decomposition
as described in the next paragraph), SIO
will immediately report the incident to
the Chief of the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, at 301–
427–8401, and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and
Howard.Goldstein@noaa.gov, and the
NMFS Southwest Regional Office (562–
980–4017) and/or by email to the
Southwest Regional Stranding
Coordinators (Joe.Cordaro@noaa.gov
and Sarah.Wilkin@noaa.gov). The report
must include the same information
identified in the paragraph above.
Activities may continue while NMFS
reviews the circumstances of the
incident. NMFS will work with SIO to
determine whether modifications in the
activities are appropriate.
In the event that SIO discovers an
injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead PSO determines that the injury
or death is not associated with or related
to the activities authorized in the IHA
(e.g., previously wounded animal,
carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage),
SIO will report the incident to the Chief
of the Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, at 301–427–8401, and/or by
email to Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and
Howard.Goldstein@noaa.gov, and the
NMFS Southwest Regional Office (562–
980–4017), and/or by email to the
Southwest Regional Stranding
Coordinators (Joe.Cordaro@noaa.gov
and Sarah.Wilkin@noaa.gov), within 24
hours of discovery. SIO will provide
photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the
stranded animal sighting to NMFS and
the Marine Mammal Stranding Network.
Activities may continue while NMFS
reviews the circumstances of the
incident.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: Any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].
Only take by Level B harassment is
anticipated and authorized as a result of
the marine seismic survey in the southeastern Pacific Ocean. Acoustic stimuli
(i.e., increased underwater sound)
generated during the operation of the
seismic airgun array may have the
potential to cause marine mammals in
the survey area to be exposed to sounds
at or greater than 160 dB or cause
temporary, short-term changes in
behavior. There is no evidence that the
planned activities could result in injury,
serious injury, or mortality within the
specified geographic area for which
NMFS has issued the IHA. Take by
injury, serious injury, or mortality is
thus neither anticipated nor authorized.
NMFS has determined that the required
mitigation and monitoring measures
will minimize any potential risk for
injury, serious injury, or mortality.
The following sections describe SIO’s
methods to estimate take by incidental
harassment and present the applicant’s
estimates of the numbers of marine
mammals that could be affected during
the seismic program. The estimates are
based on a consideration of the number
of marine mammals that could be
disturbed appreciably by operations
with the two GI airgun array to be used
during approximately 1,810 km (977.3
nmi) (includes primary and secondary
lines and an additional 25 percent
contingency) of survey lines in the
south-eastern Pacific Ocean.
SIO assumes that, during
simultaneous operations of the airgun
array and the other sources, any marine
mammals close enough to be affected by
the MBES and SBP would already be
affected by the airguns. However,
whether or not the airguns are operating
simultaneously with the other sources,
marine mammals are expected to exhibit
no more than short-term and
inconsequential responses to the MBES
and SBP given their characteristics (e.g.,
narrow, downward-directed beam) and
other considerations described
previously. Such reactions are not
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
considered to constitute ‘‘taking’’
(NMFS, 2001). Therefore, SIO provides
no additional allowance for animals that
could be affected by sound sources
other than airguns.
Extensive systematic ship-based
surveys have been conducted by NMFS
SWFSC for marine mammals in the ETP.
SIO used densities from five sources:
(1) SWFSC has recently developed
habitat modeling as a method to
estimate cetacean densities on a finer
spatial scale than traditional linetransect analyses by using a continuous
function of habitat variables, e.g., sea
surface temperature, depth, distance
from shore, and prey density (Barlow et
al., 2009). For the ETP, the models are
based on data from 12 SWFSC shipbased cetacean and ecosystem
assessment surveys conducted during
July to December from 1986 to 2006.
The models have been incorporated into
a web-based Geographic Information
System (GIS) developed by Duke
University’s Department of Defense
Strategic Environmental Research and
Development Program (SERDP) team in
close collaboration with the SWFSC
SERDP team (Read et al., 2009). For 11
cetacean species in the model, SIO used
the GIS to obtain mean densities near
the survey area, i.e., in a rectangle
bounded by 4° to 12° South and 75° to
85° West, which was the south-eastern
extent of the model;
(2) For species sighted in SWFSC
surveys whose sample sizes were too
small to model density, SIO used
densities from the surveys conducted
during summer and fall 1986 to 1996, as
summarized by Ferguson and Barlow
(2001). Densities were calculated from
Ferguson and Barlow (2003) for 5° x 5°
blocks that include the proposed survey
areas and corridors: Blocks 139, 159,
160, 200, 201, 202, 212, 213, and 219.
Those blocks included 27,275 km
(14727.3 nmi) of survey effort in
Beaufort sea states 0 to 5, and 2,564 km
(1,384.5 nmi) of survey effort in
Beaufort sea states 0 to 2. Densities were
obtained for an additional five species
that were sighted in one or more of
those blocks;
(3) For dusky dolphins, SIO used the
mean densities reported for Area A from
aerial surveys in North and Central
Patagonia (Shiavini et al., 1999),
corrected for ƒ(0), but not g(0). Since the
closest density estimates were taken
south of the survey area, where dusky
dolphin abundance is higher, SIO used
10 percent of the reported density to
account for the decreased abundance of
dusky dolphins in the proposed survey
area;
(4) For Chilean dolphins, SIO used
the estimated density of Chilean
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
dolphins in Patagonia from Heinrich
(2006). The extralimital, offshore
distribution of Chilean dolphins in the
survey area was corrected for by taking
1 percent of the densities reported by
Heinrich (2006);
(5) For blue whales, SIO used the
densities reported by GallettiVernazzani and Cabrera (2009) from
aerial surveys in Patagonia in March
2007 and April in 2009 that took place
south of the survey site (39° South to
44° South). The density estimates were
corrected for ƒ(0) and g(0). Given the
higher abundance of blue whales south
of the survey site, SIO corrected the
reported density for the survey area by
reducing the density by 50 percent.
For two species for which there are
only unconfirmed sightings in the
region, the sei and fin whale, arbitrary
low densities (equal to the density of the
species with the lowest calculated
density) were assigned. The same
arbitrary low density was assigned to
southern right whale dolphins and
Burmeister’s porpoise, where no
confirmed sightings were made within
the survey region. In addition, there
were no density estimates available for
humpback whales, minke whales, and
Peale’s dolphins, but confirmed
sightings have been made near the
survey area. SIO arbitrarily assigned a
density estimate of 0.8 animals/1,000
km2, which was similar to the densities
reported for uncommon species in the
area.
Oceanographic conditions, including
occasional El Nino and La Nina events,
influence the distribution and numbers
of marine mammals present in the ETP
and SEP, resulting in considerable yearto-year variation in the distribution and
abundance of many marine mammal
species (e.g., Escorza-Trevino, 2009).
Thus, for some species the densities
derived from recent surveys may not be
representative of densities that will be
encountered during the seismic survey.
SIO used estimated densities (see
Table 3 of the application) for each
cetacean species likely to occur in the
study area, i.e., species for which SIO
obtained or assigned densities. The
densities had been corrected, by the
authors, for both trackline detectability
and availability bias. Trackline
detection probability bias is associated
with diminishing sightability with
increasing lateral distance from the
trackline, and is measured by ƒ(0).
Availability bias refers to the fact that
there is less-than-100% probability of
sighting an animal that is present along
the survey trackline ƒ(0), and it is
measured by g(0). Corrections for ƒ(0)
and g(0) were made where mentioned
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
above. The densities are given in Table
3 of SIO’s IHA application.
SIO’s estimates of exposures to
various sound levels assume that the
surveys will be fully completed; in fact,
the ensonified areas calculated using the
planned number of line-km have been
increased by 25 percent to accommodate
turns, lines that may need to be
repeated, equipment testing, etc. As is
typical during offshore ship surveys,
inclement weather and equipment
malfunctions are likely to cause delays
and may limit the number of useful linekilometers of seismic operations that
can be undertaken. Furthermore, any
marine mammal sightings within or
near the designated EZs will result in
the shut-down of seismic operations as
a mitigation measure. Thus, the
following estimates of the numbers of
marine mammals potentially exposed to
sound levels of 160 dB re 1 mPa (rms)
are precautionary and probably
overestimate the actual numbers of
marine mammals that might be
involved. These estimates also assume
that there will be no weather,
equipment, or mitigation delays, which
is highly unlikely.
SIO estimated the number of different
individuals that may be exposed to
airgun sounds with received levels
greater than or equal to 160 dB re 1 mPa
(rms) on one or more occasions by
considering the total marine area that
would be within the 160 dB radius
around the operating airgun array on at
least one occasion, along with the
expected density of marine mammals in
the area. The seismic lines are not in
close proximity, which minimizes the
number of times an individual marine
mammal may be exposed during the
survey; the area including the overlap is
only 1.2 times the area excluding
overlap.
The numbers of different individuals
potentially exposed to greater than or
equal to 160 dB (rms) were calculated
by multiplying the expected species
density times the anticipated area to be
ensonified during airgun operations.
The area expected to be ensonified was
determined by entering the planned
survey lines into a MapInfo GIS, using
the GIS to identify the relevant areas by
‘‘drawing’’ the applicable 160 dB buffer
(see Table 1 of the IHA application)
around each seismic line, and then
calculating the total area within the
buffers. Areas where overlap occurred
(because of crossing lines) were
included only once when estimating the
number of individuals exposed.
Applying the approach described
above, approximately 1,448.4 km2
(422.3 nmi2) would be within the 160
dB isopleth on one or more occasions
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27199
during the survey (including primary
and secondary lines). The total
ensonified area used to calculate
estimated numbers exposed was
approximately 1,810.5 km2 [527.9 nmi2]
and includes the additional 25 percent
increase in the calculated area for
contingency. Because this approach
does not allow for turnover in the
marine mammal populations in the
study area during the course of the
survey, the actual number of individuals
exposed could be underestimated,
although the conservative (i.e., probably
overestimated) line-kilometer distances
used to calculate the area may offset
this. Also, the approach assumes that no
cetaceans will move away from or
toward the trackline as the Melville
approaches in response to increasing
sound levels prior to the time the levels
reach 160 dB. Another way of
interpreting the estimates that follow is
that they represent the number of
individuals that are expected (in the
absence of a seismic program) to occur
in the waters that will be exposed to
greater than or equal to 160 dB re 1 mPa
(rms).
Table 3 (Table 3 of the IHA
application) shows the estimates of the
number of different individual marine
mammals that potentially could be
exposed to greater than or equal to 160
dB re 1 mPa (rms) during the seismic
survey if no animals moved away from
the survey vessel. The requested take
authorization is given in Table 3 (below;
the far right column of Table 3 of the
IHA application). For ESA listed
species, the requested take authorization
has been increased to the mean group
size in southern Chile where available
(Viddi et al., 2010) or the ETP (Wade
and Gerodette, 1993), where the
calculated number of individuals
exposed was between 0.05 and the mean
group size (i.e., for sei, fin, humpback,
and sperm whales). For species not
listed under the ESA that could occur in
the study area, the requested take
authorization has been increased to the
mean group size in the ETP (Wade and
Gerodette, 1993) or southern Chile
(Viddi et al., 2010); ZamoranoAbramson et al., 2010) in cases where
the calculated number of individuals
exposed was between one and the mean
group size. For delphinids where
typically large group sizes are
encountered, the requested take
authorization was increased to the mean
group size in southern Chile (Aguauo et
al., 1998; Viddi et al., 2010; ZamaranoAbramson et al., 2010) if the calculated
number was greater than one, but less
than the mean group size.
The best estimate of the number of
individual cetaceans that could be
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
27200
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
exposed to seismic sounds with
received levels greater than or equal to
160 dB re 1 mPa (rms) during the survey
is 561 (see Table 3 of the IHA
application). That total includes: 1
humpback, 1 minke, 2 Bryde’s, 4 blue,
and 7 sperm whales, 1 Cuvier’s, 1
Blainville’s, and 1 unidentified
Mesoplodon beaked whale, 15 roughtoothed, 72 bottlenose, 134 spinner, 123
striped, 254 short-beaked common, 4
Peale’s, 67 dusky, and 4 Chilean
dolphins, and 1 false killer, 2 killer, and
22 long-finned pilot whales, which
would represent less than 1% of the
regional populations for any of the
respective species. Most (96.4%) of the
cetaceans potentially exposed are
delphinids; rough-toothed, short-beaked
common, striped, spinner, bottlenose,
Risso’s, and dusky dolphins and longfinned pilot whales are estimated to be
the most common species in the study
area. Due to the extralimital distribution
of pinnipeds in the study area, no
pinnipeds are expected to be
encountered during the survey. The
authorized incidental take numbers of
humpback (3), minke (2), sperm (8),
Cuvier’s (2), Blainville’s (2),
Mesoplodon spp. (2), false killer (10),
and killer (10) whales, as well as roughtoothed (15), bottlenose (72), spinner
(134), Risso’s (254), and Peale’s (4)
dolphins has been requested from the
calculated potential takes to account for
mean group size (Jefferson et al., 2008).
TABLE 3—ESTIMATES OF THE POSSIBLE NUMBERS OF MARINE MAMMALS EXPOSED TO DIFFERENT SOUND LEVELS ≥160
dB DURING SIO’S SEISMIC SURVEY IN THE SOUTH-EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN DURING MAY 2012
Estimated number
of individuals
exposed to sound
levels
≥160 dB re 1 μPa 1
Species
Authorized take
requested
Approximate
percent of regional
population
(for incidental take
authorized) 2
Incidental take
authorized
Mysticetes
Humpback whale .............................................................
Minke whale .....................................................................
Bryde’s whale ..................................................................
Sei whale .........................................................................
Fin whale .........................................................................
Blue whale .......................................................................
1
1
2
0
0
4
*3
*2
2
0
0
4
3
2
2
0
0
4
0.1
<0.01
<0.01
NA
NA
0.3
*8
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
* 15
* 72
* 134
123
* 254
18
1
2
22
*4
67
0
4
0
8
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
2
15
72
134
123
254
18
10
10
22
4
67
0
4
0
0.03
NA
NA
0.01
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.01
0.02
<0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
<0.01
0.12
0.01
NA
0.92
NA
0.4
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
Odontocetes
Sperm whale ....................................................................
Pygmy sperm whale ........................................................
Dwarf sperm whale ..........................................................
Cuvier’s beaked whale ....................................................
Blainville’s beaked whale .................................................
Gray’s beaked whale .......................................................
Hector’s beaked whale ....................................................
Strap-toothed beaked whale ............................................
Unidentified Mesoplodon spp. .........................................
Rough-toothed dolphin ....................................................
Bottlenose dolphin ...........................................................
Spinner dolphin ................................................................
Striped dolphin .................................................................
Short-beaked common dolphin ........................................
Risso’s dolphin .................................................................
False killer whale .............................................................
Killer whale ......................................................................
Long-finned pilot whale ....................................................
Peale’s dolphin ................................................................
Dusky dolphin ..................................................................
Southern right whale dolphin ...........................................
Chilean dolphin ................................................................
Burmeister’s porpoise ......................................................
7
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
8
31
65
123
201
18
1
2
22
1
67
0
4
0
Pinnipeds
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
South American fur seal ..................................................
Juan Fernandez fur seal ..................................................
South American sea lion .................................................
Southern elephant seal ....................................................
0
0
0
0
1 Estimates are based on densities from Table 1 (Table 3 of the IHA application) and ensonified areas (including 25% contingency) for 160 dB
of 1,810.5 km 2.
2 Regional population size estimates are from Table 2 (see Table 2 of the IHA application); NA means not available.
* Requested authorized take was increased to mean group size for delphinids if calculated numbers were between 1 and mean group size, and
increased to the mean group size if calculated vales were greater than 0.05 for endangered species.
N.A. Not available or not assessed.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Encouraging and Coordinating
Research
SIO and NSF will coordinate the
planned marine mammal monitoring
program associated with the seismic
survey in the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean with any parties that may have or
express an interest in the seismic survey
area. SIO and NSF have coordinated,
and will continue to coordinate, with
other applicable Federal agencies as
required, and will comply with their
requirements. Pursuant to IHA
requirements, SIO will submit a
monitoring report to NMFS 90 days after
the survey. PSO data collected during
the survey will be submitted to OBIS
Seamap and will be made available on
the NSF Web site for interested parties
and researchers.
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers
Analysis and Determination
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘* * * an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’ In making a
negligible impact determination, NMFS
evaluated factors such as:
(1) The number of anticipated
injuries, serious injuries, or mortalities;
(2) The number, nature, and intensity,
and duration of Level B harassment (all
relatively limited);
(3) The context in which the takes
occur (i.e., impacts to areas of
significance, impacts to local
populations, and cumulative impacts
when taking into account successive/
contemporaneous actions when added
to baseline data);
(4) The status of stock or species of
marine mammals (i.e., depleted, not
depleted, decreasing, increasing, stable,
and impact relative to the size of the
population);
(5) Impacts on habitat affecting rates
of recruitment/survival; and
(6) The effectiveness of monitoring
and mitigation measures (i.e., the
manner and degree in which the
measure is likely to reduce adverse
impacts to marine mammals, the likely
effectiveness of the measures, and the
practicability of implementation).
For reasons stated previously in this
document, and in the notice of the
proposed IHA (77 FR 14744, March 13,
2012), the specified activities associated
with the marine seismic survey are not
likely to cause PTS, or other nonauditory injury, serious injury, or death
because:
(1) The likelihood that, given
sufficient notice through relatively slow
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
ship speed, marine mammals are
expected to move away from a noise
source that is annoying prior to its
becoming potentially injurious;
(2) The potential for temporary or
permanent hearing impairment is
relatively low and would likely be
avoided through the incorporation of
the required monitoring and mitigation
measures (described above);
(3) The fact that pinnipeds would
have to be closer than 10 m (32.8 ft) (for
the 45 in3) or 20 m (65.6 ft) (for the 105
in3) in deep water when the two GI
airgun array is in use at 2 m (6.6 ft) tow
depth from the vessel to be exposed to
levels of sound believed to have even a
minimal chance of causing PTS;
(4) The fact that cetaceans would have
to be closer than 40 m (131.2 ft) (for the
45 in3) or 70 m (229.7 ft) (for the 105
in3)in deep water when the two GI
airgun array is in 2 m tow depth from
the vessel to be exposed to levels of
sound believed to have even a minimal
chance of causing PTS; and
(5) The likelihood that marine
mammal detection ability by trained
PSOs is high at close proximity to the
vessel.
No injuries, serious injuries, or
mortalities are anticipated to occur as a
result of SIO’s planned marine seismic
survey, and none are authorized by
NMFS. Only short-term, behavioral
disturbance is anticipated to occur due
to the brief and sporadic duration of the
survey activities. Table 3 in this
document outlines the number of Level
B harassment takes that are anticipated
as a result of the activities. Due to the
nature, degree, and context of Level B
(behavioral) harassment anticipated and
described (see Potential Effects on
Marine Mammals section above) in this
notice, the activity is not expected to
impact rates of recruitment or survival
for any affected species or stock.
Additionally, the seismic survey will
not adversely impact marine mammal
habitat.
Many animals perform vital functions,
such as feeding, resting, traveling, and
socializing, on a diel cycle (i.e., 24 hr
cycle). Behavioral reactions to noise
exposure (such as disruption of critical
life functions, displacement, or
avoidance of important habitat) are
more likely to be significant if they last
more than one diel cycle or recur on
subsequent days (Southall et al., 2007).
While seismic operations are
anticipated to occur on consecutive
days, the entire duration of the survey
is not expected to last more than 15
days and the Melville will be
continuously moving along planned
tracklines. Therefore, the seismic survey
will be increasing sound levels in the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27201
marine environment surrounding the
vessel for several weeks in the study
area.
Of the 32 marine mammal species
under NMFS jurisdiction that are
known to or likely to occur in the study
area, five are listed as endangered under
the ESA: humpback, sei, fin, blue, and
sperm whale. These species are also
considered depleted under the MMPA.
There is generally insufficient data to
determine population trends for the
other depleted species in the study area.
To protect these animals (and other
marine mammals in the study area), SIO
must cease or reduce airgun operations
if animals enter designated zones. No
injury, serious injury, or mortality is
expected to occur and due to the nature,
degree, and context of the Level B
harassment anticipated, the activity is
not expected to impact rates of
recruitment or survival.
As mentioned previously, NMFS
estimates that 20 species of marine
mammals under its jurisdiction could be
potentially affected by Level B
harassment over the course of the IHA.
For each species, these numbers are
small (each less than one percent)
relative to the regional population size.
The population estimates for the marine
mammal species that may be taken by
Level B harassment were provided in
Table 1 of this document.
NMFS’s practice has been to apply the
160 dB re 1 mPa (rms) received level
threshold for underwater impulse sound
levels to determine whether take by
Level B harassment occurs. Southall et
al. (2007) provide a severity scale for
ranking observed behavioral responses
of both free-ranging marine mammals
and laboratory subjects to various types
of anthropogenic sound (see Table 4 in
Southall et al. [2007]).
NMFS has determined, provided that
the aforementioned mitigation and
monitoring measures are implemented,
that the impact of conducting a marine
seismic survey in the south-eastern
Pacific Ocean, May, 2012, may result, at
worst, in a temporary modification in
behavior and/or low-level physiological
effects (Level B harassment) of small
numbers of certain species of marine
mammals. See Table 3 (above) for the
requested authorized take numbers of
cetaceans and pinnipeds.
While behavioral modifications,
including temporarily vacating the area
during the operation of the airgun(s),
may be made by these species to avoid
the resultant acoustic disturbance, the
availability of alternate areas within
these areas and the short and sporadic
duration of the research activities, have
led NMFS to determine that this action
will have a negligible impact on the
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
27202
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
species in the specified geographic
region.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
mitigation and monitoring measures,
NMFS finds that SIO’s planned research
activities, will result in the incidental
take of small numbers of marine
mammals, by Level B harassment only,
and that the total taking from the marine
seismic survey will have a negligible
impact on the affected species or stocks
of marine mammals; and that impacts to
affected species or stocks of marine
mammals have been mitigated to the
lowest level practicable.
consultations were consolidated and
addressed in a single BiOp addressing
the direct and indirect effects of these
interdependent actions. In May, 2012,
NMFS issued a BiOp and concluded
that the action and issuance of the IHA
are not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of cetaceans,
pinnipeds, and sea turtles and included
an Incidental Take Statement (ITS)
incorporating the requirements of the
IHA as Terms and Conditions.
Compliance with those Relevant Terms
and Conditions of the ITS is likewise a
mandatory requirement of the IHA. The
BiOp also concluded that designated
critical habitat of these species does not
occur in the action area and would not
be affected by the survey.
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species or Stock for Taking for
Subsistence Uses
Section 101(a)(5)(D) also requires
NMFS to determine that the
authorization will not have an
unmitigable adverse effect on the
availability of marine mammal species
or stocks for subsistence use. There are
no relevant subsistence uses of marine
mammals in the study area (offshore
waters of the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean off of Chile) that implicate
MMPA section 101(a)(5)(D).
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
To meet NMFS’s NEPA requirements
for the issuance of an IHA to SIO, NMFS
prepared an ‘‘Environmental
Assessment on the Issuance of an
Incidental Harassment Authorization to
the Scripps Institution of Oceanography
to Take Marine Mammals by
Harassment Incidental to a Marine
Geophysical Survey in the SouthEastern Pacific Ocean, May, 2012.’’ This
EA incorporates the NSF’s ‘‘National
Environmental Policy Act Analysis
Pursuant to Executive Order 12114 of a
Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V
Melville in the South-Eastern Pacific
Ocean, May 2012’’ and an associated
report (Report) prepared by LGL for NSF
and SIO titled ‘‘Final Environmental
Analysis of a Marine Geophysical
Survey by the R/V Melville in the SouthEastern Pacific Ocean off Chile, May
2012,’’ by reference pursuant to 40 CFR
1502.21 and NOAA Administrative
Order (NAO) 216–6 § 5.09(d). NMFS has
fully evaluated the potential direct,
indirect, and cumulative effects on the
human environment prior to making a
final decision on the IHA application
and deciding whether or not to issue a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI). After considering the final EA,
the information in the IHA application,
BiOp, and the Federal Register notice,
as well as public comments, NMFS has
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Endangered Species Act
Of the species of marine mammals
that may occur in the survey area,
several are listed as endangered under
the ESA, including the humpback, sei,
fin, blue, and sperm whale. Under
section 7 of the ESA, NSF initiated and
engaged in formal consultation with the
NMFS, Office of Protected Resources,
Endangered Species Act Interagency
Cooperation Division, on this seismic
survey. NMFS’s Office of Protected
Resources, Permits and Conservation
Division, also initiated and engaged in
formal consultation under section 7 of
the ESA with NMFS’s Office of
Protected Resources, Endangered
Species Act Interagency Cooperation
Division, on the issuance of an IHA
under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
for this activity. These two
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determined that the issuance of the IHA
is not likely to result in significant
impacts on the human environment and
has prepared a FONSI. An
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required and will not be prepared for
the action. Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to SIO for
the take, by Level B harassment, of
small numbers of marine mammals
incidental to conducting a marine
seismic survey in the south-eastern
Pacific Ocean, provided the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: May 2, 2012.
Helen M. Golde,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–11207 Filed 5–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal Nos. 12–15]
36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
Department of Defense, Defense
Security Cooperation Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense is
publishing the unclassified text of a
section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.
This is published to fulfill the
requirements of section 155 of Public
Law 104–164 dated July 21, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703)
601–3740.
The following is a copy of a letter to
the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, Transmittals 12–15
with attached transmittal, policy
justification, and Sensitivity of
Technology.
SUMMARY:
Dated: May 4, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27189-27202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11207]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XA961
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Low-
Energy Marine Geophysical Survey in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean,
May, 2012
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an Incidental Take Authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)
regulation, notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography (SIO) to take marine mammals, by Level B harassment,
incidental to conducting a low-energy marine geophysical (i.e.,
seismic) survey in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean, May, 2012.
DATES: Effective May 4, 2012 through June 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the final IHA and application are available by
writing to Tammy Adams, Acting Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 or by
telephoning the contacts listed here.
A copy of the IHA application containing a list of the references
used in this document may be obtained by writing to the above address,
telephoning the contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) or visiting the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Goldstein or Jolie Harrison,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 301-427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1371 (a)(5)(D)) directs
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to authorize, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals of a species or population stock, by United States citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a
specified geographical region if certain findings are made and, if the
taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization
is provided to the public for review.
Authorization for the incidental taking of small numbers of marine
mammals shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or stock(s), and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where relevant). The authorization must
set forth the permissible methods of taking, other means of effecting
the least practicable impact on the species or stock and its habitat,
and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting
of such takings. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR
216.103 as ``* * * an impact resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to,
adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates
of recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA establishes a 45-day time limit for
NMFS's review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental
harassment of small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the
close of the public comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the
authorization.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].
The National Science Foundation (NSF) has prepared a ``National
Environmental Policy Act Analysis Pursuant to Executive Order 12114 of
a Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V Melville in the South-Eastern
Pacific Ocean May 2012.'' The analysis incorporates an ``Final
Environmental Analysis of a Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V
Melville in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean off Chile, May 2012,''
prepared by LGL Ltd., Environmental Research Associates (LGL), on
behalf of NSF and SIO, which is also available at the same internet
address. To meet NMFS's NEPA requirements for the issuance of an IHA to
SIO, NMFS prepared an ``Environmental Assessment on the Issuance of an
Incidental Harassment Authorization to the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography to Take Marine Mammals by Harassment Incidental to a
Marine Geophysical Survey in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean, May,
2012.'' NMFS also issued a Biological Opinion (BiOp) under section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to evaluate the effects of the survey
and IHA on marine species listed as threatened or endangered. The NMFS
BiOp will be available online at: https:// www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/consultations/opinions.htm. Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular business hours, at the
aforementioned address.
Summary of Request
NMFS received an application on December 23, 2011, from SIO for the
taking by harassment, of marine mammals, incidental to conducting a
low-energy marine seismic survey in the
[[Page 27190]]
south-eastern Pacific Ocean. SIO, a part of the University of
California San Diego, with research funding from the NSF, plans to
conduct a low-energy seismic survey in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean
off the coast of Chile during May, 2012, for approximately five to 11
days. The survey will use a pair of Generator Injector (GI) airguns
each with a discharge volume of 45 or 105 cubic inches (in\3\) (maximum
total volume of 210 in\3\) . SIO plans to conduct the survey from
approximately May 4 to 18, 2012. The seismic survey will be conducted
in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Chile. On behalf of SIO, the
U.S. State Department will seek authorization from Chile for clearance
to work in its EEZ. On March 13, 2012, NMFS published a notice in the
Federal Register (77 FR 14744) making preliminary determinations and
proposing to issue an IHA. The notice initiated a 30 day public comment
period.
SIO plans to use one source vessel, the R/V Melville (Melville) and
a seismic airgun array to collect seismic reflection and refraction
profiles to monitor the post-seismic response of the outer acretionary
prism, the area where sediments are accreted onto the non-subducting
tectonic plate at the convergent plate boundary off of the coast of
Chile. In addition to the operations of the seismic airgun array, SIO
intends to operate a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and a sub-bottom
profiler (SBP) continuously throughout the survey.
Acoustic stimuli (i.e., increased underwater sound) generated
during the operation of the seismic airgun array may have the potential
to cause a short-term behavioral disturbance for marine mammals in the
survey area. This is the principal means of marine mammal taking
associated with these activities and SIO has requested an authorization
to take 20 species of marine mammals by Level B harassment. Take is not
expected to result from the use of the MBES or SBP, for reasons
discussed in this notice; nor is take expected to result from collision
with the vessel because it is a single vessel moving at a relatively
slow speed during seismic acquisition within the survey, for a
relatively short period of time (approximately five to 11 days). It is
likely that any marine mammal would be able to avoid the vessel.
Description of the Specified Activity
SIO's planned seismic survey in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean
will take place for approximately 5 to 11 days in May, 2012 (see Figure
1 of the IHA application). The seismic survey will take place in water
depths ranging from approximately 1,000 to 5,300 meters (m) (3,280.8 to
17,388.5 feet [ft]) and the program will consist of approximately 1,145
kilometers (km) (618.3 nautical miles [nmi]) of seismic survey
tracklines (see Figure 1 of the IHA application). The survey will take
place in the area approximately 34[deg] to 36[deg] South, 72[deg] to
74[deg] West, off the coast of Chile. The project is scheduled to occur
from approximately May 4 to 18, 2012. Some minor deviation from these
dates is possible, depending on logistics and weather.
The survey will involve one source vessel, the Melville. For the
seismic component of the research program, the Melville will deploy an
array of two low-energy Sercel Generator Injector (GI) airguns as an
energy source (each with a discharge volume of 45 or 105 in\3\, maximum
total volume 210 in\3\) at a tow depth of 2 m (6.6 ft). The acoustic
receiving system will consist of a 200 to 800 m (656.2 to 2,624.7 ft)
hydrophone streamer with up to 48 channels with 12.5 m (41 ft) channel
spacing, and broadband Ocean Bottom Seismometers (OBSs). The energy to
the airguns is compressed air supplied by compressors on board the
source vessel. As the airgun is towed along the survey lines, the
hydrophone streamer will receive the returning acoustic signals and
transfer the data to the on-board processing system. The OBSs acquire
the signal, process the data, and log it internally until the
instrument is retrieved and the data is recovered.
SIO plans to use conventional low-energy seismic methodology to
monitor the post-seismic response of the outer accretionary prism, the
area where sediments are accreted onto the non-subducting tectonic
plate at the convergent plate boundary. To provide constraints on the
fault structure and seismic stratigraphy in the accretionary wedge,
high resolution seismic data will be acquired using two GI airguns shot
simultaneously. Simultaneous shots from both airguns will provide
penetration to basement in the trench and clearly define fault
structures and folds in the slop basin sediments that overlie the
accretionary complex. The primary tracklines, approximately 569 km
(307.2 nmi), identified in Figure 1 of the IHA application, will be
surveyed first. Depending on the weather, quality and at sea
conditions, efforts will be made to survey the secondary tracklines,
approximately 576 km (311 nmi), identified in Figure 1 of the IHA
application. During the survey OBSs will be deployed and survey
profiles will be taken along the tracklines that extend from the trench
across the accretionary complex to the region of greatest slip. These
data will be processed onboard the vessel and will be used to optimize
the location of remaining profiles to be collected within the survey
site area. In addition to the operations of the airgun array, a MBES
and SBP will also be operated from the Melville continuously throughout
the cruise. There will be additional seismic operations associated with
equipment testing, start-up, and possible line changes or repeat
coverage of any areas where initial data quality is sub-standard. In
SIO's calculations, 25% has been added for those contingency
operations.
All planned geophysical data acquisition activities will be
conducted by technicians provided by SIO, with on-board assistance by
the scientists who have planned the study. The Principal Investigator
(PI) is Dr. Anne Trehu of Oregon State University. The vessel will be
self-contained, and the crew will live aboard the vessel for the entire
cruise.
Description of the Dates, Duration, and Specified Geographic Region
The Melville is expected to depart and return to Bahia de
Valparaiso, Chile. The cruise is scheduled to occur for approximately 5
to 11 days from May 4 to 18, 2012. Of the approximately 15 day cruise,
approximately five days will be spent collecting seismic data along the
primary tracklines, with potential for an additional six days of
seismic data acquisition along the secondary tracklines, barring
weather or instrument related issues. Remaining cruise time will be
spent transiting to and from port. Some minor deviation from this
schedule is possible, depending on logistics and weather. The survey
will occur in the area approximately 34[deg] to 35[deg] South,
approximately 72[deg] to 74[deg] West (see Figure 1 of the IHA
application). Water depths in the survey area generally range from
approximately 1,000 to 5,300 m (3,280.8 to 17,388.5 ft). The seismic
survey will be conducted in the EEZ of Chile, approximately 50 km (27
nmi) off the coast of Chile.
NMFS outlined the purpose of the program in a previous notice for
the proposed IHA (77 FR 14744, March 13, 2012). The activities to be
conducted have not changed between the proposed IHA notice and this
final notice announcing the issuance of the IHA. For a more detailed
description of the authorized action, including vessel and acoustic
source specifications, the reader should refer to the proposed IHA
notice (77 FR 14744, March 13, 2012), the IHA application, EA, and
associated
[[Page 27191]]
documents referenced above this section.
Comments and Responses
A notice of proposed IHA for the SIO seismic survey was published
in the Federal Register on March 13, 2012 (77 FR 14744). During the 30
day public comment period, NMFS received comments from the Marine
Mammal Commission (Commission). The Commission's comments are online
at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. Following are
their substantive comments and NMFS's response:
Comment 1: The Commission recommends that NMFS require SIO to re-
estimate exclusion zones (EZ) and buffer zones for the two airgun array
and associated number of marine mammal takes using operational and
site-specific environmental parameters--if the EZs and buffer zones and
number of takes are not re-estimated; and require SIO to provide a
detailed justification for basing the EZs and buffer zones for the
proposed survey in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean on modeling that
relies on measurements from the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). The Commission
would like an opportunity to evaluate the detailed justification prior
to issuance of the authorization.
Response: With respect to the Commission's first point, based upon
the best available information and NMFS' analysis of the likely effects
of the specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, NMFS is
satisfied that the data supplied by SIO are sufficient for NMFS to
conduct its analysis and support the determinations under the MMPA,
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The identified zones are
appropriate for the survey and additional field measurements are not
necessary at this time. Thus, for this survey, NMFS will not require
SIO to re-estimate the proposed exclusion zones (EZs) and buffer zones
and associated number of marine mammal takes using operational and
site-specific environmental parameters.
With respect to the Commission's second point, SIO has modeled the
EZ and buffer zones in the action area based on L-DEO's 2003 (Tolstoy
et al., 2004) and 2007-2008 (Tolstoy et al., 2009) peer-reviewed,
calibration studies in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Received levels
have been modeled by L-DEO for a number of airgun configurations,
including two 105 in\3\ GI airguns, in relation to distance and
direction from the airguns (see Figure 2a and 2b of the IHA
application). NSF's environmental analysis (see Appendix A) includes
detailed information on the study, their modeling process, and a
comparison of SIO's modeled results with results of the 2007 to 2008
Marcus G. Langseth calibration experiment in shallow, intermediate, and
deep water. The conclusions in Appendix A show that SIO's model
represents the actual produced sound levels, particularly within the
first few kms, where the predicted zone (i.e., EZ) lie. At greater
distances, local oceanographic variations begin to take effect, and the
model tends to over predict.
Because the modeling matches the observed measurement data, the
authors concluded that those using the models to predict zones can
continue to do so, including predicting EZs and buffer zones around the
vessel for various tow depths. At present, L-DEO's model does not
account for site-specific environmental conditions and the calibration
study analysis of the model predicted that using site-specific
information may actually estimate less conservative EZs at greater
distances.
While it is difficult to estimate exposures of marine mammals to
acoustic stimuli, NMFS is confident that SIO's approach to quantifying
the EZs and buffer zones uses the best available scientific information
and estimation methodologies. After considering this commend and
evaluating the respective approaches for establishing EZs and buffer
zones, NMFS had determined that SIO's approach and corresponding
monitoring and mitigation measures will effect the least practicable
impact on affected marine mammal species or stocks.
Comment 2: The Commission recommends that NMFS, before issuing the
requested IHA, (1) use species-specific maximum densities derived by
multiplying the best density estimates by a precautionary correction
factor and (2) re-estimate the anticipated number of takes using that
precautionary approach.
Response: For purposes of this IHA, NMFS is using the estimated
densities provided in the applicant's application to estimate the
number of authorized takes for SIO's seismic survey in the south-
eastern Pacific Ocean as NMFS is confident in the assumptions and
calculations used to estimate density for this survey area. SIO used
reported densities from five sources (i.e., Read et al., 2009; Ferguson
and Barlow, 2003; Shiavini et al., 1999; Heinrich, 2006; and Galletti-
Vernazzani and Cabrera, 2009) that included habitat modeling for
estimating cetacean densities based on numerous surveys in the eastern
tropical Pacific for 11 cetacean species as well as a correction factor
(0.5) for estimated densities from regional aerial and/or vessel
surveys near the action area for dusky and Chilean dolphins as well as
blue whales. Estimated densities that were obtained or assigned to each
cetacean species have been corrected for both detectability and
availability bias by the authors. SIO's use of these peer-reviewed,
model-based, density estimates are the best available information to
estimate density for the survey area and to estimate the number of
authorized takes for the seismic survey in the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean. The results of the associated monitoring reports show that the
past use of the best estimates was appropriate and has not refuted
NMFS's past determinations.
Comment 3: The Commission recommends that, before issuing the
requested IHA, NMFS prohibit the use of a 15 minute pause (i.e.,
extended shut-down) following the sighting of a mysticete or large
odontocete in the exclusion zone and extend that pause to cover the
maximum dive times of the species likely to be encountered prior to
initiating ramp-up procedures.
Response: NMFS would like to clarify the Commission's understanding
of two conditions within the IHA--one related to turning on the airguns
(ramp-up) after a shut-down due to a marine mammal sighting about to
enter or within the EZ, and the other related to a ramp-up after an
extended shut-down (i.e., the 15 minute pause due to equipment failure
or routine maintenance).
To clarify, the IHA requires the Melville to shut-down the airguns
when a Protected Species Observer (PSO) sees a marine mammal within,
approaching, or entering the relevant EZs for cetaceans or for
pinnipeds. Following a shut-down, the Melville would only ramp-up the
airguns if a marine mammal had exited the EZ or if the PSO had not seen
the animals within the relevant EZ for 15 minutes for species with
shorter dive times (i.e., small odontocetes and pinnipeds) or 30
minutes for species with longer dive durations (i.e., mysticetes and
large odontocetes, including sperm, pygmy sperm, dwarf sperm, killer,
and beaked whales).
NMFS believes that 30 minutes is an adequate length for the
monitoring period prior to the ramp-up of the airgun array after
sighting a mysticete or large odontocete for the following reasons:
The Melville can transit roughly 5 knots; the ship would
move 2.3 km (1.25 nmi) in 15 minutes or 4.6 km (2.5 nmi) in 30 minutes.
At this distance, the
[[Page 27192]]
vessel will have moved 65.7 times (4.6 km/0.07 km) away from the
distance of the original 180 dB EZ (70 m [229.7 ft] for two 105 in\3\
airguns) from the initial sighting. The vessel will have moved 115
times (4.6 km/0.04 km) away from the distance of the 180 dB EZ (40 m
[131.2 ft] for the two 45 in\3\ GI airguns) from the initial sighting.
The relevant EZs for cetaceans and pinnipeds are
relatively small (i.e., 70 m for cetaceans and 20 m [65.6 ft] for
pinnipeds for the two 105 in\3\ GI airguns, and 40 m for cetaceans and
10 m [32.8 ft] for pinnipeds for the two 45 in\3\ GI airguns).
Extending the monitoring period for a relatively small EZ would not
meaningfully increase the effectiveness of observing marine mammals
approaching or entering the EZ for the full source level and would not
further minimize the potential for take.
Because a significant part of their movement is vertical
(deep-diving), it is unlikely that a submerged mysticete or large
odontocete would move in the same direction and speed (roughly 5 knots)
with the vessel for 30 minutes. If a mysticete or large odontocete's
maximum underwater dive time is 45 minutes, then there is only a one in
three chance that the last random surfacing could occur within the 70
or 40 m EZ.
The PSOs are constantly monitoring the horizon and the EZs
during the 30 minute period. On average, PSOs can observe to the
horizon (10 km; 5.4 nmi) from the height of the Melville's observation
deck and should be able to say with a reasonable degree of confidence
whether a marine mammal would be encountered within this distance
before resuming the two GI airgun operations at full power.
Next, NMFS intends to clarify the monitoring period associated with
an extended shut-down (i.e., the 15 minute pause due to equipment
failure or routine maintenance). During active seismic operations,
there are occasions when the Melville crew will need to temporarily
shut-down the airguns due to equipment failure or for maintenance.
Thus, an extended shut-down is not related to PSO detecting a marine
mammal within, approaching, or entering the relevant EZs. However, the
PSOs are still actively monitoring the relevant EZs for cetaceans and
pinnipeds.
In conclusion, NMFS has designed monitoring and mitigation measures
to comply with the requirement that incidental take authorizations must
include means of effecting the least practicable impact on marine
mammal species and their habitat. The effectiveness of monitoring is
science-based, and monitoring and mitigation measures must be
``practicable.'' NMFS believes that the framework for visual monitoring
will: (1) Be effective at spotting almost all species for which SIO has
requested take, and (2) that imposing additional requirements, such as
those suggested by the Commission, would not meaningfully increase the
effectiveness of observing marine mammals approaching or entering the
EZs and thus further minimize the potential for take.
In the case of an extended shut-down, due to equipment failure or
routine maintenance, the Melville's crew will turn on the airguns and
follow the mitigation and monitoring procedures for a ramp-up after a
period of 15 minutes. Again, the PSOs will monitor the full EZs for
marine mammals and will implement a shut-down, if necessary. After
considering this comment and evaluating the monitoring and mitigation
requirements to be included in the IHA, NMFS has determined that SIO's
approach and corresponding monitoring and mitigation measures will
effect the least practicable impact on affected marine mammal species
or stocks.
Comment 4: The Commission recommends that NMFS work with the NSF to
analyze the data collected during ramp-up procedures to help determine
the effectiveness of those procedures as a mitigation measure for
geophysical surveys.
Response: NMFS acknowledges the Commission's request for an
analysis of ramp-ups and will work with NSF and SIO to help identify
the effectiveness of the mitigation measure for seismic surveys. The
IHA requires that PSOs on the Melville make observations for 30 minutes
prior to ramp-up, during all ramp-ups, and during all daytime seismic
operations and record the following information when a marine mammal is
sighted:
(i) Species, group size, age/size/sex categories (if determinable),
behavior when first sighted and after initial sighting, heading (if
consistent), bearing and distance from the seismic vessel, sighting
cue, apparent reaction of the airguns or vessel (e.g., none, avoidance,
approach, paralleling, etc., and including responses to ramp-up), and
behavioral pace; and
(ii) Time, location, heading, speed, activity of the vessel
(including number of airguns operating and whether in state of ramp-up
or shut-down), Beaufort wind force and sea state, visibility, and sun
glare.
One of the primary purposes of monitoring is to result in
``increased knowledge of the species'' and the effectiveness of
required monitoring and mitigation measures; the effectiveness of ramp-
up as a mitigation measure and marine mammal reaction to ramp-up would
be useful information in this regard. NMFS requires NSF and SIO to
gather all data that could potentially provide information regarding
the effectiveness of ramp-up as a mitigation measure in its monitoring
report. However, considering the low numbers of marine mammal sightings
and low number of ramp-ups it is unlikely that the information will
result in any statistically robust conclusions for this particular
seismic survey. Over the long term, these requirements may provide
information regarding the effectiveness of ramp-up as a mitigation
measure, provided PSOs detect animals during ramp-up.
Description of the Marine Mammals in the Specified Geographic Area
of the Specified Activity
Thirty-two marine mammal species could occur in the south-eastern
Pacific Ocean survey area. Twenty-eight cetacean species (22
odontocetes and 6 mysticetes) and four pinniped species could occur in
the south-eastern Pacific Ocean study area. Several of these species
are listed as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including the humpback (Megaptera
novaeangliae), sei (Balaenoptera borealis), fin (Balaenoptera
physalus), blue (Balaenoptera musculus), and sperm (Physeter
macrocephalus) whale.
An additional 12 cetacean species, although present in the wider
south-eastern Pacific Ocean, likely would not be found in the proposed
seismic survey area because their ranges in the survey area are
extralimital, or they are typically found in coastal water. Southern
right whales (Eubalaena australis) are listed as endangered under the
ESA. Sightings are seen on rare occasions off the coasts of Peru and
Chile (Aguayo et al., 1992; Santillan et al., 2004), although females
with calves have been observed between June and October. Given the size
of this population, estimated at 50 individuals, in Chile and Peru
(IWC, 2007; ICW, 2007b) and the rarity of the species in the survey
area, it is unlikely that individuals from this subpopulation will be
encountered. Pygmy right whales (Caperea marginata) are rarely seen at
sea, but are known from stranding records off Chile (Cabrera et al.,
2005). Little is known about Arnoux's beaked whale (Berardius arnuxii)
as they are rarely seen, but typically they are found between the
Antarctic continent and 34[deg] South. The
[[Page 27193]]
northernmost limit of their range overlaps with the survey area, but no
records of their occurrence exist within the survey area. The spade
toothed beaked whale (Mesoplodon traversii) and Shepherd's beaked whale
(Tasmacetus shepherdi) are uncommon species, but individuals have been
described from stranding records in the Juan Fernandez Archipelago in
Chile (Reyes et al., 1996) approximately 700 km (378 nmi) west of the
survey site. The ginkgo-toothed beaked whale (Mesoplodon ginkgodens),
pygmy beaked whale (Mesoplodon peruvianus), and the long-beaked common
dolphin (Delphinus capensis) are likely extralimital with distributions
mostly north of the survey area. The Commerson's dolphin
(Cephalorhynchus commersonii), hourglass dolphin (Lagenorhynchus
cruciger), and southern bottlenose whale (Hyperoodon planifrons) are
also extralimital in the survey area, but have a northernmost extent
that is south of the survey area.
No cetacean distribution and abundance studies have been conducted
in the survey area. The closest distribution studies have been in the
Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) and Patagonia, in southern Chile.
Several other studies of marine mammal distribution and abundance have
been conducted in the wider ETP. The most extensive regional
distribution and abundance data come primarily from multi-year vessel
surveys conducted by NMFS's Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC).
The surveys were conducted during July to December in an area generally
extending from 30[deg] North to 18[deg] South from the coastline to
153[deg] West (Wade and Gerrodette, 1993; Ferguson and Barlow, 2001;
Gerrodette et al., 2008; and Jackson et al., 2008).
The marine mammals that occur in the survey area belong to three
taxonomic groups: odontocetes (toothed whales and dolphins), mysticetes
(baleen whales), and pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, and walrus).
Cetaceans and pinnipeds are the subject of the IHA application to NMFS.
Table 1 (below) presents information on the abundance,
distribution, population status, conservation status, and density of
the marine mammals that may occur in the survey area during May, 2012.
Table 1--The Habitat, Regional Abundance, and Conservation Status of Marine Mammals That May Occur in or Near the Seismic Survey Area in the South-
Eastern Pacific Ocean
[See text and Tables 2 to 3 in SIO's application for further details]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Density (/1,000 km\2\)
\3\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mysticetes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humpback whale (Megaptera Mainly nearshore waters \6\ 2,900.............. EN.................... D..................... \4\ 0.8
novaeangliae). and banks. (SE Pacific)...........
Minke whale (Balaenoptera Coastal................ \7\ 338,000............ NL.................... NC.................... \4\ 0.8
acutorostrata).
Bryde's whale (Balaenoptera edeni).. Pelagic and coastal.... 130,008................ NL.................... NC.................... 0.96
Sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis)... Mostly pelagic......... \8\ 11,000............. EN.................... D..................... \5\ 0.01
Fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus)... Slope, mostly pelagic.. \9\ 15,178............. EN.................... D..................... \5\ 0.01
Blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus).. Pelagic and coastal.... \10\ 1,415............. EN.................... D..................... 2.44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Odontocetes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) Usually deep pelagic, \11\ 26,053............ EN.................... D..................... 3.95
steep topography.
Pygmy sperm whale (Kogia breviceps). Deep waters off shelf.. \12\ 150,000........... NL.................... NC.................... 0.03
Dwarf sperm whale (Kogia sima)...... Deep waters off shelf.. \12\ 150,000........... NL.................... NC.................... 0.03
Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius Slope and pelagic...... \13\ 20,000............ NL.................... NC.................... 0.80
cavirostris).
Blainville's beaked whale Slope and pelagic...... \14\ 25,300............ NL.................... NC.................... 0.80
(Mesoplodon densirostris).
Gray's beaked whale (Mesoplodon Slope and pelagic...... NA..................... NL.................... NC.................... NA
grayi).
Hector's beaked whale (Mesoplodon Slope and pelagic...... NA..................... NL.................... NC.................... NA
hectori).
Strap-toothed beaked whale Slope and pelagic...... NA..................... NL.................... NC.................... NA
(Mesoplodon layardii).
Unidentified Mesoplodon spp......... Slope and pelagic...... NA..................... NL.................... NC.................... 0.36
Rough-toothed dolphin (Steno Mainly pelagic......... 107,633................ NL.................... NC.................... 4.19
bredanensis).
Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops Coastal, shelf, pelagic 335,834................ NL.................... NC; D--Western North 17.06
truncatus). Atlantic coastal.
Spinner dolphin (Stenella Coastal and pelagic.... 1,797,716.............. NL.................... NC.................... 35.70
longirostris).
Striped dolphin (Stenella Off continental shelf.. 964,362................ NL.................... NC; D--Eastern........ 67.80
coeruleoalba).
[[Page 27194]]
Short-beaked common dolphin Shelf, pelagic, high 3,127,203.............. NL.................... NC.................... 110.90
(Delphinus delphis). relief.
Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus)... Shelf, slope, seamounts 110,457................ NL.................... NC.................... 10.21
False killer whale (Pseudorca Pelagic................ 398,009................ NL; Proposed EN-- NC.................... 0.39
crassidens). insular Hawaiian.
Killer whale (Orcinus orca)......... Widely distributed..... \15\ 8,500............. NL; EN--Southern NC; D--Southern 0.85
resident. resident, AT1
transient.
Long-finned pilot whale Shelf and pelagic...... \16\ 200,000........... NL.................... NC.................... 11.88
(Globicephala melas).
Peale's dolphin (Lagenorhynchus Coastal and shelf...... NA..................... NL.................... NC.................... \4\ 0.8
australis).
Dusky dolphin (Lagenorhynchus Shelf and slope........ \17\ 7,252............. NL.................... NC.................... 37
obscures).
Southern right whale dolphin Pelagic................ NA..................... NL.................... NC.................... \5\ 0.01
(Lissodelphis peronni).
Chilean dolphin (Cephalorhynchus Coastal and shelf...... \18\ < 10,000.......... NL.................... NC.................... 11.11
eutropia).
Burmeister's porpoise (Phocoena Coastal................ NA..................... NL.................... NC.................... \5\ 0.01
spinipinnis).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinnipeds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
South American fur seal (Otaria Coastal and shelf...... \19\ 30,000............ NL.................... NC.................... NA
flavescens).
Juan Fernandez fur seal Coastal and shelf...... \20\ 12,000............ NL.................... NC.................... NA
(Arctocephalus philippii).
South American sea lion Coastal and shelf...... \21\ 150,000........... NL.................... NC.................... NA
(Arctocephalus australis).
Southern elephant seal (Mirounga Coastal and pelagic.... \22\ 650,000........... NL.................... NC.................... NA
leonina).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N.A. = Not available or not assessed.
\1\ U.S. Endangered Species Act: EN = Endangered, T = Threatened, NL = Not listed.
\2\ U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act: D = Depleted, NC = Not Classified.
\3\ Densities of other species (e.g., pinnipeds) presumably would b lower than the lowest density in Table 3 of the application.
\4\ Densities assigned an arbitrary density similar to densities reported for species that are uncommon in the survey area.
\5\ Densities assigned an arbitrarily low number for rare species with unconfirmed sightings in the survey area.
\6\ Southeast Pacific (Felix et al., 2005)
\7\ Estimated from Antarctic and common minke whales in South Pacific (Reilly, 2011).
\8\ Based on 2007 projection for southern hemisphere (IWC, 1996).
\9\ Based on 2007 projection for southern hemisphere (Reilly, 2011).
\10\ ETP (Wade and Gerrodette, 1993) excluded nursing area south of study area estimated at approximately 267 animals.
\11\ Eastern temperate North Pacific (Whitehead, 2002).
\12\ This abundance estimate is for Kogia sima and Kogia breviceps in ETP (Ferguson and Barlow, 2001).
\13\ ETP (Wade and Gerrodette, 1993).
\14\ This estimate includes all species of the genus Mesoplodon in the ETP (Ferguson and Barlow, 2001).
\15\ ETP (Ford, 2002).
\16\ Southern hemisphere population (Waring et al., 1997).
\17\ Patagonian coast population (Dans et al., 1997).
\18\ South-Eastern Pacific (Reeves et al., 2008).
\19\ Chile (Arias, Shreiber, and Rivas, 1998).
\20\ Juan Fernandez Archipelago population (Aurioles and Trillmich, 2008).
\21\ Peru and Chile (Campagna, 2008a).
\22\ Southern hemisphere (Campagna, 2009).
Refer to Section III and IV of SIO's application for detailed
information regarding the abundance and distribution, population
status, and life history and behavior of these species and their
occurrence in the project area. The application also presents how SIO
calculated the estimated densities for the marine mammals in the survey
area. NMFS has reviewed these data and determined them to be the best
available scientific information for the purposes of the IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
Acoustic stimuli generated by the operation of the airguns, which
introduce sound into the marine environment, may have the potential to
cause Level B harassment of marine mammals in the survey area. The
effects of sounds from airgun operations might include one or more of
the following: Tolerance, masking of natural sounds, behavioral
disturbance, temporary or permanent hearing impairment, or non-auditory
physical or physiological effects (Richardson et al., 1995; Gordon et
al., 2004; Nowacek et al., 2007; Southall et al., 2007).
Permanent hearing impairment, in the unlikely event that it
occurred, would
[[Page 27195]]
constitute injury, but temporary threshold shift (TTS) is not an injury
(Southall et al., 2007). Although the possibility cannot be entirely
excluded, it is unlikely that the proposed project would result in any
cases of temporary or permanent hearing impairment, or any significant
non-auditory physical or physiological effects. Based on the available
data and studies described here, some behavioral disturbance is
expected, but NMFS expects the disturbance to be localized and short-
term.
The notice of the proposed IHA (77 FR 14744, March 13, 2012)
included a discussion of the effects of sounds from airguns on
mysticetes, odontocetes, and pinnipeds including tolerance, masking,
behavioral disturbance, hearing impairment, and other non-auditory
physical effects. NMFS refers the reader to SIO's application and EA
for additional information on the behavioral reactions (or lack
thereof) by all types of marine mammals to seismic vessels.
Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat, Fish, Fisheries, and
Invertebrates
NMFS included a detailed discussion of the potential effects of
this action on marine mammal habitat, including physiological and
behavioral effects on marine fish, fisheries, and invertebrates in the
notice of the proposed IHA (77 FR 14744, March 13, 2012). The seismic
survey will not result in any permanent impact on habitats used by the
marine mammals in the proposed survey area, including the food sources
they use (i.e. fish and invertebrates), and there will be no physical
damage to any habitat. While NMFS anticipates that the specified
activity may result in marine mammals avoiding certain areas due to
temporary ensonification, this impact to habitat is temporary and
reversible which was considered in further detail in the notice of the
proposed IHA (77 FR 14744, March 13, 2012), as behavioral modification.
The main impact associated with the activity will be temporarily
elevated noise levels and the associated direct effects on marine
mammals.
Recent work by Andre et al. (2011) purports to present the first
morphological and ultrastructural evidence of massive acoustic trauma
(i.e., permanent and substantial alterations of statocyst sensory hair
cells) in four cephalopod species subjected to low-frequency sound. The
cephalopods, primarily cuttlefish, were exposed to continuous 40 to 400
Hz sinusoidal wave sweeps (100% duty cycle and 1 s sweep period) for
two hours while captive in relatively small tanks (one 2,000 liter [L,
2 m\3\] and one 200 L [0.2 m\3\] tank). The received SPL was reported
as 1575 dB re 1 [mu]Pa, with peak levels at 175 dB re 1
[mu]Pa. As in the McCauley et al. (2003) paper on sensory hair cell
damage in pink snapper as a result of exposure to seismic sound, the
cephalopods were subjected to higher sound levels than they would be
under natural conditions, and they were unable to swim away from the
sound source.
Mitigation
In order to issue an ITA under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to such
activity, and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on such species or stock and its habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and the availability of such species or stock for taking
for certain subsistence uses.
SIO has based development and evaluation of effectiveness of the
mitigation measures, to be implemented under the IHA for the seismic
survey, on the following:
(1) Protocols used during previous SIO seismic research cruises as
approved by NMFS;
(2) Previous IHA applications and IHAs approved and authorized by
NMFS; and
(3) Recommended best practices in Richardson et al. (1995), Pierson
et al. (1998), and Weir and Dolman, (2007).
Planning Phase--The PIs worked with SIO and NSF to identify
potential time periods to carry out the survey taking into
consideration key factors such as environmental conditions (i.e., the
seasonal presence of marine mammals), weather conditions, equipment,
and optimal timing for other proposed seismic surveys using the
Melville. Most marine mammal species are expected to occur in the area
year-round, so altering the timing of the proposed survey likely would
result in no net benefits for those species. Baleen whales are most
common south of the survey area between February and June, whereas
odontocetes were most commonly observed between October and November.
After considering what energy source level was necessary to achieve the
research goals, the PIs determined the use of the two GI airgun array
with a maximum total volume of 210 in\3\ would be required; however, a
lower energy source with a total volume of 90 in\3\ may be used. Given
the research goals, location of the survey and associated deep water,
this energy source level was viewed appropriate. The location of the
survey was informed and adjusted based on the latest scientific
information on the epicenter of the February 27, 2010 earthquake;
survey location is critical for collecting the data for the overall
research activity and meeting research objectives.
To reduce the potential for disturbance of marine mammals from
acoustic stimuli associated with the specified activities, the IHA
requires SIO and/or its designees shall implement the following
mitigation measures:
(1) Exclusion zones;
(2) Speed or course alteration;
(3) Shut-down procedures; and
(4) Ramp-up procedures.
Exclusion Zones--Received sound levels have been modeled by L-DEO
for a number of airgun configurations, including two 45 or two 105
in\3\ GI airguns, in relation to distance and direction from the
airguns (see Figure 2a and 2b of the IHA application). The models do
not allow for bottom interactions, and are most directly applicable to
deep water. Based on the modeling, estimates of the maximum distances
from the source where sound levels are predicted to be 190, 180, and
160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) in deep water were determined (see Table 2
below).
Empirical data concerning the 190, 180, and 160 dB (rms) distances
were acquired for various airgun arrays based on measurements during
the acoustic verification studies conducted by L-DEO in the northern
GOM in 2003 (Tolstoy et al., 2004) and 2007 to 2008 (Tolstoy et al.,
2009). Results of the 36 airgun array are not relevant for the two GI
airguns to be used in the survey. The empirical data for the 6, 10, 12,
and 20 airgun arrays indicate that, for deep water, the L-DEO model
tends to overestimate the received sound levels at a given distance
(Tolstoy et al., 2004). Measurements were not made for the two GI
airgun array in deep water, however, SIO proposes to use the EZ
predicted by L-DEO's model for the GI airgun operations in deep water,
although they are likely conservative give the empirical results for
the other arrays.
The 180 and 190 dB radii are shut-down criteria applicable to
cetaceans and pinnipeds, respectively, as specified by NMFS (2000);
these levels were used to establish the EZs. If the PSO detects marine
mammal(s) within or about to enter the appropriate EZ, the airguns will
be shut-down immediately.
Table 2 summarizes the predicted distances at which sound levels
(160, 180, and 190 dB [rms]) are expected to
[[Page 27196]]
be received from the two GI airgun array operating in deep water
depths.
Table 2--Distances to Which Sound Levels >=190, 180, and 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) Could Be Received in Deep Water During the Seismic Survey in the South-
Eastern Pacific Ocean, May 2012
[Distances are based on model results provided by L-DEO]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicted RMS radii distances (m)
Source and Volume Tow depth (m) Water depth (m) -----------------------------------------------
190 dB 180 dB 160 dB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two GI airguns (105 in\3\) (210 in\3\ total) 2 Deep (>1,000)............................. 20 70 670
Two GI airguns (45 in\3\) (90 in\3\ total).. 2 Deep (>1,000 )............................ 10 40 350
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speed or Course Alteration--If a marine mammal is detected outside
the EZ and, based on its position and the relative motion, is likely to
enter the EZ, the vessel's speed and/or direct course could be changed.
This would be done if operationally practicable while minimizing the
effect on the planned science objectives. The activities and movements
of the marine mammal (relative to the seismic vessel) will then be
closely monitored to determine whether the animal is approaching the
applicable EZ. If the animal appears likely to enter the EZ, further
mitigative actions will be taken, i.e., either further course
alterations or a shut-down of the seismic source. Typically, during
seismic operations, the source vessel is unable to change speed or
course and one or more alternative mitigation measures will need to be
implemented.
Shut-down Procedures--SIO will shut down the operating airgun(s) if
a marine mammal is seen outside the EZ for the airgun(s), and if the
vessel's speed and/or course cannot be changed to avoid having the
animal enter the EZ, the seismic source will be shut-down before the
animal is within the EZ. If a marine mammal is already within the EZ
when first detected, the seismic source will be shut-down immediately.
Following a shut-down, SIO will not resume airgun activity until
the marine mammal has cleared the EZ. SIO will consider the animal to
have cleared the EZ if:
A PSO has visually observed the animal leave the EZ, or
A PSO has not sighted the animal within the EZ for 15
minutes for species with shorter dive durations (i.e., small
odontocetes or pinnipeds), or 30 minutes for species with longer dive
durations (i.e., mysticetes and large odontocetes, including sperm,
killer, and beaked whales).
Ramp-up Procedures--SIO will follow a ramp-up procedure when the
airgun array begins operating after a specified period without airgun
operations or when a shut-down has exceeded that period. For the
present cruise, this period will be approximately 15 minutes under the
IHA. SIO has used similar periods (approximately 15 minutes) during
previous SIO surveys.
Ramp-up will begin with a single GI airgun (45 or 105 in\3\). The
second GI airgun (45 or 105 in\3\) will be added after five minutes.
During ramp-up, the PSOs will monitor the EZ, and if marine mammals are
sighted, SIO will implement a shut-down as though both GI airguns were
operational.
If the complete EZ has not been visible for at least 30 minutes
prior to the start of operations in either daylight or nighttime, SIO
will not commence the ramp-up. If one airgun has operated, ramp-up to
full power will be permissible at night or in poor visibility, on the
assumption that marine mammals will be alerted to the approaching
seismic vessel by the sounds from the single airgun and could move away
if they choose. A ramp-up from a shut-down may occur at night, but only
where the EZ is small enough to be visible. SIO will not initiate a
ramp-up of the airguns if a marine mammal is sighted within or near the
applicable EZs during the day or close to the vessel at night.
NMFS has carefully evaluated the applicant's mitigation measures
and has considered a range of other measures in the context of ensuring
that NMFS prescribes the means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on the affected marine mammal species and stocks and
their habitat. NMFS's evaluation of potential measures included
consideration of the following factors in relation to one another:
(1) The manner in which, and the degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure is expected to minimize adverse impacts
to marine mammals;
(2) The proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to
minimize adverse impacts as planned; and
(3) The practicability of the measure for applicant implementation.
Based on NMFS's evaluation of the applicant's measures, as well as
other measures considered by NMFS or recommended by the public, NMFS
has determined that the mitigation measures included in the IHA provide
the means of effecting the least practicable impacts on marine mammal
species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of
the MMPA states that NMFS must set forth ``requirements pertaining to
the monitoring and reporting of such taking.'' The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13) indicate that requests for IHAs
must include the suggested means of accomplishing the necessary
monitoring and reporting that will result in increased knowledge of the
species and of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be present in the action area.
Monitoring
SIO will sponsor marine mammal monitoring during the present
project, in order to implement the mitigation measures that require
real-time monitoring, and to satisfy the anticipated monitoring
requirements of the IHA. SIO's Monitoring Plan is described below this
section. The monitoring work described here has been planned as a self-
contained project independent of any other related monitoring projects
that may be occurring simultaneously in the same regions. SIO is
prepared to discuss coordination of its monitoring program with any
related work that might be done by other groups insofar as this is
practical and desirable.
Vessel-Based Visual Monitoring
SIO's PSOs will be based aboard the seismic source vessel and will
watch for marine mammals near the vessel during
[[Page 27197]]
daytime airgun operations and during any ramp-ups at night. PSOs will
also watch for marine mammals near the seismic vessel for at least 30
minutes prior to the ramp-up of airgun operations after an extended
shut-down (i.e., greater than approximately 15 minutes for this
proposed cruise). When feasible, PSOs will conduct observations during
daytime periods when the seismic system is not operating for comparison
of sighting rates and behavior with and without airgun operations and
between acquisition periods. Based on PSO observations, the airguns
will be shut-down when marine mammals are observed within or about to
enter a designated EZ. The EZ is a region in which a possibility exists
of adverse effects on animal hearing or other physical effects.
During seismic operations in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean, three
PSOs will be based aboard the Melville. SIO will appoint the PSOs with
NMFS's concurrence. At least one PSO will monitor the EZs during
seismic operations. Observations will take place during ongoing daytime
operations and nighttime ramp-ups of the airguns. PSO(s) will be on
duty in shifts of duration no longer than 4 hr. The vessel crew will
also be instructed to assist in detecting marine mammals.
The Melville is a suitable platform for marine mammal observations
of protected species. The primary observer platform is located one deck
below and forward of the bridge (02 level, 12.46 m [40.9 ft] above the
waterline), affording relatively unobstructed 180[deg] forward view. A
pair of Big-eye binoculars is mounted in this location. The open deck
continues along both the port and starboard sides, and opens up to an
aft deck stretching across the full width of the vessel. PSOs have
views in a full 360[deg] by walking along this deck. In extremely
inclement weather, the PSOs move on to the bridge (03 level, 15.5 m
[50.6 ft] above the water line). There they will have a 360[deg] view
through the windows.
During daytime, the PSOs will scan the area around the vessel
systematically with reticle binoculars (e.g., 7 x 50 Fujinon), Big-eye
binoculars (25 x 150), optical range finders and with the naked eye.
During darkness, night vision devices (NVDs) will be available, when
required. The PSOs will be in wireless communication with the vessel's
officers on the bridge and scientists in the vessel's operations
laboratory, so they can advise promptly of the need for avoidance
maneuvers or seismic source shut-down. When marine mammals are detected
within or about to enter the designated EZ, the airguns will
immediately be shut-down. The PSO(s) will continue to maintain watch to
determine when the animal(s) are outside the EZ by visual confirmation.
Airgun operations will not resume until the animal is confirmed to have
left the EZ, or if not observed after 15 minutes for species with
shorter dive durations (small odontocetes and pinnipeds) or 30 minutes
for species with longer dive durations (mysticetes and large
odontocetes, including sperm, killer, and beaked whales).
PSO Data and Documentation
PSOs will record data to estimate the numbers of marine mammals
exposed to various received sound levels and to document apparent
disturbance reactions or lack thereof. Data will be used to estimate
numbers of animals potentially `taken' by harassment (as defined in the
MMPA). They will also provide information needed to order a shut-down
of the airguns when a marine mammal is within or near the EZ.
Observations will also be made during daytime periods when the Melville
is underway without seismic operations (i.e., transits to, from, and
through the study area) to collect baseline biological data.
When a sighting is made, the following information about the
sighting will be recorded:
1. Species, group size, age/size/sex categories (if determinable),
behavior when first sighted and after initial sighting, heading (if
consistent), bearing and distance from seismic vessel, sighting cue,
apparent reaction to the airguns or vessel (e.g., none, avoidance,
approach, paralleling, etc.), and behavioral pace.
2. Time, location, heading, speed, activity of the vessel, Beaufort
sea state, visibility, and sun glare.
The data listed under (2) will also be recorded at the start and
end of each observation watch, and during a watch whenever there is a
change in one or more of the variables.
All observations as well as information regarding shut-downs of the
seismic source, will be recorded in a standardized format. The data
accuracy will be verified by the PSOs at sea, and preliminary reports
will be prepared during the field program and summaries forwarded to
the operating institution's shore facility and to NSF weekly or more
frequently.
Vessel-based observations by the PSO will provide the following
information:
1. The basis for real-time mitigation (airgun shut-down).
2. Information needed to estimate the number of marine mammals
potentially taken by harassment, which must be reported to NMFS.
3. Data on the occurrence, distribution, and activities of marine
mammals in the area where the seismic study is conducted.
4. Information to compare the distance and distribution of marine
mammals relative to the source vessel at times with and without seismic
activity.
5. Data on the behavior and movement patterns of marine mammals
seen at times with and without seismic activity.
SIO will submit a report to NMFS and NSF within 90 days after the
end of the cruise. The report will describe the operations that were
conducted and sightings of marine mammals near the operations. The
report will provide full documentation of methods, results, and
interpretation pertaining to all monitoring. The 90-day report will
summarize the dates and locations of seismic operations, and all marine
mammal sightings (dates, times, locations, activities, associated
seismic survey activities). The report will also include estimates of
the number and nature of exposures that could result in potential
``takes'' of marine mammals by harassment or in other ways. After the
report is considered final, it will be publicly available on the NMFS
and NSF Web sites.
In the unanticipated event that the specified activity clearly
causes the take of a marine mammal in a manner prohibited by this IHA,
such as an injury (Level A harassment), serious injury or mortality
(e.g., ship-strike, gear interaction, and/or entanglement), SIO will
immediately cease the specified activities and immediately report the
incident to the Chief of the Permits and Conservation Division, Office
of Protected Resources, NMFS at 301-427-8401 and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and Howard.Goldstein@noaa.gov, and the NMFS
Southwest Regional Stranding Coordinators (Joe.Cordaro@noaa.gov and
Sarah.Wilkin@noaa.gov). The report must include the following
information:
Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the
incident;
Name and type of vessel involved;
Vessel's speed during and leading up to the incident;
Description of the incident;
Status of all sound source use in the 24 hours preceding
the incident;
Water depth;
Environmental conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction,
Beaufort sea state, cloud cover, and visibility);
Description of all marine mammal observations in the 24
hours preceding the incident;
[[Page 27198]]
Species identification or description of the animal(s)
involved;
Fate of the animal(s); and
Photographs or video footage of the animal(s) (if
equipment is available).
Activities shall not resume until NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take. NMFS shall work with SIO to
determine what is necessary to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. SIO may not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS via letter or email, or telephone.
In the event that SIO discovers an injured or dead marine mammal,
and the lead PSO determines that the cause of the injury or death is
unknown and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less than a
moderate state of decomposition as described in the next paragraph),
SIO will immediately report the incident to the Chief of the Permits
and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, at 301-
427-8401, and/or by email to Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and
Howard.Goldstein@noaa.gov, and the NMFS Southwest Regional Office (562-
980-4017) and/or by email to the Southwest Regional Stranding
Coordinators (Joe.Cordaro@noaa.gov and Sarah.Wilkin@noaa.gov). The
report must include the same information identified in the paragraph
above. Activities may continue while NMFS reviews the circumstances of
the incident. NMFS will work with SIO to determine whether
modifications in the activities are appropriate.
In the event that SIO discovers an injured or dead marine mammal,
and the lead PSO determines that the injury or death is not associated
with or related to the activities authorized in the IHA (e.g.,
previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage), SIO will report the incident to
the Chief of the Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, at 301-427-8401, and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and Howard.Goldstein@noaa.gov, and the NMFS
Southwest Regional Office (562-980-4017), and/or by email to the
Southwest Regional Stranding Coordinators (Joe.Cordaro@noaa.gov and
Sarah.Wilkin@noaa.gov), within 24 hours of discovery. SIO will provide
photographs or video footage (if available) or other documentation of
the stranded animal sighting to NMFS and the Marine Mammal Stranding
Network. Activities may continue while NMFS reviews the circumstances
of the incident.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].
Only take by Level B harassment is anticipated and authorized as a
result of the marine seismic survey in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean.
Acoustic stimuli (i.e., increased underwater sound) generated during
the operation of the seismic airgun array may have the potential to
cause marine mammals in the survey area to be exposed to sounds at or
greater than 160 dB or cause temporary, short-term changes in behavior.
There is no evidence that the planned activities could result in
injury, serious injury, or mortality within the specified geographic
area for which NMFS has issued the IHA. Take by injury, serious injury,
or mortality is thus neither anticipated nor authorized. NMFS has
determined that the required mitigation and monitoring measures will
minimize any potential risk for injury, serious injury, or mortality.
The following sections describe SIO's methods to estimate take by
incidental harassment and present the applicant's estimates of the
numbers of marine mammals that could be affected during the seismic
program. The estimates are based on a consideration of the number of
marine mammals that could be disturbed appreciably by operations with
the two GI airgun array to be used during approximately 1,810 km (977.3
nmi) (includes primary and secondary lines and an additional 25 percent
contingency) of survey lines in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean.
SIO assumes that, during simultaneous operations of the airgun
array and the other sources, any marine mammals close enough to be
affected by the MBES and SBP would already be affected by the airguns.
However, whether or not the airguns are operating simultaneously with
the other sources, marine mammals are expected to exhibit no more than
short-term and inconsequential responses to the MBES and SBP given
their characteristics (e.g., narrow, downward-directed beam) and other
considerations described previously. Such reactions are not considered
to constitute ``taking'' (NMFS, 2001). Therefore, SIO provides no
additional allowance for animals that could be affected by sound
sources other than airguns.
Extensive systematic ship-based surveys have been conducted by NMFS
SWFSC for marine mammals in the ETP. SIO used densities from five
sources:
(1) SWFSC has recently developed habitat modeling as a method to
estimate cetacean densities on a finer spatial scale than traditional
line-transect analyses by using a continuous function of habitat
variables, e.g., sea surface temperature, depth, distance from shore,
and prey density (Barlow et al., 2009). For the ETP, the models are
based on data from 12 SWFSC ship-based cetacean and ecosystem
assessment surveys conducted during July to December from 1986 to 2006.
The models have been incorporated into a web-based Geographic
Information System (GIS) developed by Duke University's Department of
Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
(SERDP) team in close collaboration with the SWFSC SERDP team (Read et
al., 2009). For 11 cetacean species in the model, SIO used the GIS to
obtain mean densities near the survey area, i.e., in a rectangle
bounded by 4[deg] to 12[deg] South and 75[deg] to 85[deg] West, which
was the south-eastern extent of the model;
(2) For species sighted in SWFSC surveys whose sample sizes were
too small to model density, SIO used densities from the surveys
conducted during summer and fall 1986 to 1996, as summarized by
Ferguson and Barlow (2001). Densities were calculated from Ferguson and
Barlow (2003) for 5[deg] x 5[deg] blocks that include the proposed
survey areas and corridors: Blocks 139, 159, 160, 200, 201, 202, 212,
213, and 219. Those blocks included 27,275 km (14727.3 nmi) of survey
effort in Beaufort sea states 0 to 5, and 2,564 km (1,384.5 nmi) of
survey effort in Beaufort sea states 0 to 2. Densities were obtained
for an additional five species that were sighted in one or more of
those blocks;
(3) For dusky dolphins, SIO used the mean densities reported for
Area A from aerial surveys in North and Central Patagonia (Shiavini et
al., 1999), corrected for [fnof](0), but not g(0). Since the closest
density estimates were taken south of the survey area, where dusky
dolphin abundance is higher, SIO used 10 percent of the reported
density to account for the decreased abundance of dusky dolphins in the
proposed survey area;
(4) For Chilean dolphins, SIO used the estimated density of Chilean
[[Page 27199]]
dolphins in Patagonia from Heinrich (2006). The extralimital, offshore
distribution of Chilean dolphins in the survey area was corrected for
by taking 1 percent of the densities reported by Heinrich (2006);
(5) For blue whales, SIO used the densities reported by Galletti-
Vernazzani and Cabrera (2009) from aerial surveys in Patagonia in March
2007 and April in 2009 that took place south of the survey site
(39[deg] South to 44[deg] South). The density estimates were corrected
for [fnof](0) and g(0). Given the higher abundance of blue whales south
of the survey site, SIO corrected the reported density for the survey
area by reducing the density by 50 percent.
For two species for which there are only unconfirmed sightings in
the region, the sei and fin whale, arbitrary low densities (equal to
the density of the species with the lowest calculated density) were
assigned. The same arbitrary low density was assigned to southern right
whale dolphins and Burmeister's porpoise, where no confirmed sightings
were made within the survey region. In addition, there were no density
estimates available for humpback whales, minke whales, and Peale's
dolphins, but confirmed sightings have been made near the survey area.
SIO arbitrarily assigned a density estimate of 0.8 animals/1,000 km\2\,
which was similar to the densities reported for uncommon species in the
area.
Oceanographic conditions, including occasional El Nino and La Nina
events, influence the distribution and numbers of marine mammals
present in the ETP and SEP, resulting in considerable year-to-year
variation in the distribution and abundance of many marine mammal
species (e.g., Escorza-Trevino, 2009). Thus, for some species the
densities derived from recent surveys may not be representative of
densities that will be encountered during the seismic survey.
SIO used estimated densities (see Table 3 of the application) for
each cetacean species likely to occur in the study area, i.e., species
for which SIO obtained or assigned densities. The densities had been
corrected, by the authors, for both trackline detectability and
availability bias. Trackline detection probability bias is associated
with diminishing sightability with increasing lateral distance from the
trackline, and is measured by [fnof](0). Availability bias refers to
the fact that there is less-than-100% probability of sighting an animal
that is present along the survey trackline [fnof](0), and it is
measured by g(0). Corrections for [fnof](0) and g(0) were made where
mentioned above. The densities are given in Table 3 of SIO's IHA
application.
SIO's estimates of exposures to various sound levels assume that
the surveys will be fully completed; in fact, the ensonified areas
calculated using the planned number of line-km have been increased by
25 percent to accommodate turns, lines that may need to be repeated,
equipment testing, etc. As is typical during offshore ship surveys,
inclement weather and equipment malfunctions are likely to cause delays
and may limit the number of useful line-kilometers of seismic
operations that can be undertaken. Furthermore, any marine mammal
sightings within or near the designated EZs will result in the shut-
down of seismic operations as a mitigation measure. Thus, the following
estimates of the numbers of marine mammals potentially exposed to sound
levels of 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) are precautionary and probably
overestimate the actual numbers of marine mammals that might be
involved. These estimates also assume that there will be no weather,
equipment, or mitigation delays, which is highly unlikely.
SIO estimated the number of different individuals that may be
exposed to airgun sounds with received levels greater than or equal to
160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) on one or more occasions by considering the
total marine area that would be within the 160 dB radius around the
operating airgun array on at least one occasion, along with the
expected density of marine mammals in the area. The seismic lines are
not in close proximity, which minimizes the number of times an
individual marine mammal may be exposed during the survey; the area
including the overlap is only 1.2 times the area excluding overlap.
The numbers of different individuals potentially exposed to greater
than or equal to 160 dB (rms) were calculated by multiplying the
expected species density times the anticipated area to be ensonified
during airgun operations. The area expected to be ensonified was
determined by entering the planned survey lines into a MapInfo GIS,
using the GIS to identify the relevant areas by ``drawing'' the
applicable 160 dB buffer (see Table 1 of the IHA application) around
each seismic line, and then calculating the total area within the
buffers. Areas where overlap occurred (because of crossing lines) were
included only once when estimating the number of individuals exposed.
Applying the approach described above, approximately 1,448.4 km\2\
(422.3 nmi\2\) would be within the 160 dB isopleth on one or more
occasions during the survey (including primary and secondary lines).
The total ensonified area used to calculate estimated numbers exposed
was approximately 1,810.5 km\2\ [527.9 nmi\2\] and includes the
additional 25 percent increase in the calculated area for contingency.
Because this approach does not allow for turnover in the marine mammal
populations in the study area during the course of the survey, the
actual number of individuals exposed could be underestimated, although
the conservative (i.e., probably overestimated) line-kilometer
distances used to calculate the area may offset this. Also, the
approach assumes that no cetaceans will move away from or toward the
trackline as the Melville approaches in response to increasing sound
levels prior to the time the levels reach 160 dB. Another way of
interpreting the estimates that follow is that they represent the
number of individuals that are expected (in the absence of a seismic
program) to occur in the waters that will be exposed to greater than or
equal to 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms).
Table 3 (Table 3 of the IHA application) shows the estimates of the
number of different individual marine mammals that potentially could be
exposed to greater than or equal to 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) during the
seismic survey if no animals moved away from the survey vessel. The
requested take authorization is given in Table 3 (below; the far right
column of Table 3 of the IHA application). For ESA listed species, the
requested take authorization has been increased to the mean group size
in southern Chile where available (Viddi et al., 2010) or the ETP (Wade
and Gerodette, 1993), where the calculated number of individuals
exposed was between 0.05 and the mean group size (i.e., for sei, fin,
humpback, and sperm whales). For species not listed under the ESA that
could occur in the study area, the requested take authorization has
been increased to the mean group size in the ETP (Wade and Gerodette,
1993) or southern Chile (Viddi et al., 2010); Zamorano-Abramson et al.,
2010) in cases where the calculated number of individuals exposed was
between one and the mean group size. For delphinids where typically
large group sizes are encountered, the requested take authorization was
increased to the mean group size in southern Chile (Aguauo et al.,
1998; Viddi et al., 2010; Zamarano-Abramson et al., 2010) if the
calculated number was greater than one, but less than the mean group
size.
The best estimate of the number of individual cetaceans that could
be
[[Page 27200]]
exposed to seismic sounds with received levels greater than or equal to
160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) during the survey is 561 (see Table 3 of the
IHA application). That total includes: 1 humpback, 1 minke, 2 Bryde's,
4 blue, and 7 sperm whales, 1 Cuvier's, 1 Blainville's, and 1
unidentified Mesoplodon beaked whale, 15 rough-toothed, 72 bottlenose,
134 spinner, 123 striped, 254 short-beaked common, 4 Peale's, 67 dusky,
and 4 Chilean dolphins, and 1 false killer, 2 killer, and 22 long-
finned pilot whales, which would represent less than 1% of the regional
populations for any of the respective species. Most (96.4%) of the
cetaceans potentially exposed are delphinids; rough-toothed, short-
beaked common, striped, spinner, bottlenose, Risso's, and dusky
dolphins and long-finned pilot whales are estimated to be the most
common species in the study area. Due to the extralimital distribution
of pinnipeds in the study area, no pinnipeds are expected to be
encountered during the survey. The authorized incidental take numbers
of humpback (3), minke (2), sperm (8), Cuvier's (2), Blainville's (2),
Mesoplodon spp. (2), false killer (10), and killer (10) whales, as well
as rough-toothed (15), bottlenose (72), spinner (134), Risso's (254),
and Peale's (4) dolphins has been requested from the calculated
potential takes to account for mean group size (Jefferson et al.,
2008).
Table 3--Estimates of the Possible Numbers of Marine Mammals Exposed to Different Sound Levels >=160 dB During
SIO's Seismic Survey in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean During May 2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate
Estimated number percent of
of individuals Authorized take Incidental take regional
Species exposed to sound requested authorized population (for
levels >=160 dB incidental take
re 1 [mu]Pa \1\ authorized) \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mysticetes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humpback whale.................. 1 * 3 3 0.1
Minke whale..................... 1 * 2 2 <0.01
Bryde's whale................... 2 2 2 <0.01
Sei whale....................... 0 0 0 NA
Fin whale....................... 0 0 0 NA
Blue whale...................... 4 4 4 0.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Odontocetes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sperm whale..................... 7 * 8 8 0.03
Pygmy sperm whale............... 0 0 0 NA
Dwarf sperm whale............... 0 0 0 NA
Cuvier's beaked whale........... 1 1 2 0.01
Blainville's beaked whale....... 1 1 2 <0.01
Gray's beaked whale............. 0 0 0 NA
Hector's beaked whale........... 0 0 0 NA
Strap-toothed beaked whale...... 0 0 0 NA
Unidentified Mesoplodon spp..... 1 1 2 NA
Rough-toothed dolphin........... 8 * 15 15 0.01
Bottlenose dolphin.............. 31 * 72 72 0.02
Spinner dolphin................. 65 * 134 134 <0.01
Striped dolphin................. 123 123 123 0.01
Short-beaked common dolphin..... 201 * 254 254 0.01
Risso's dolphin................. 18 18 18 0.02
False killer whale.............. 1 1 10 <0.01
Killer whale.................... 2 2 10 0.12
Long-finned pilot whale......... 22 22 22 0.01
Peale's dolphin................. 1 \*\ 4 4 NA
Dusky dolphin................... 67 67 67 0.92
Southern right whale dolphin.... 0 0 0 NA
Chilean dolphin................. 4 4 4 0.4
Burmeister's porpoise........... 0 0 0 NA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinnipeds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
South American fur seal......... 0 0 0 NA
Juan Fernandez fur seal......... 0 0 0 NA
South American sea lion......... 0 0 0 NA
Southern elephant seal.......... 0 0 0 NA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Estimates are based on densities from Table 1 (Table 3 of the IHA application) and ensonified areas
(including 25% contingency) for 160 dB of 1,810.5 km \2\.
\2\ Regional population size estimates are from Table 2 (see Table 2 of the IHA application); NA means not
available.
* Requested authorized take was increased to mean group size for delphinids if calculated numbers were between 1
and mean group size, and increased to the mean group size if calculated vales were greater than 0.05 for
endangered species.
N.A. Not available or not assessed.
[[Page 27201]]
Encouraging and Coordinating Research
SIO and NSF will coordinate the planned marine mammal monitoring
program associated with the seismic survey in the south-eastern Pacific
Ocean with any parties that may have or express an interest in the
seismic survey area. SIO and NSF have coordinated, and will continue to
coordinate, with other applicable Federal agencies as required, and
will comply with their requirements. Pursuant to IHA requirements, SIO
will submit a monitoring report to NMFS 90 days after the survey. PSO
data collected during the survey will be submitted to OBIS Seamap and
will be made available on the NSF Web site for interested parties and
researchers.
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers Analysis and Determination
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``* * *
an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.'' In making a negligible impact determination,
NMFS evaluated factors such as:
(1) The number of anticipated injuries, serious injuries, or
mortalities;
(2) The number, nature, and intensity, and duration of Level B
harassment (all relatively limited);
(3) The context in which the takes occur (i.e., impacts to areas of
significance, impacts to local populations, and cumulative impacts when
taking into account successive/contemporaneous actions when added to
baseline data);
(4) The status of stock or species of marine mammals (i.e.,
depleted, not depleted, decreasing, increasing, stable, and impact
relative to the size of the population);
(5) Impacts on habitat affecting rates of recruitment/survival; and
(6) The effectiveness of monitoring and mitigation measures (i.e.,
the manner and degree in which the measure is likely to reduce adverse
impacts to marine mammals, the likely effectiveness of the measures,
and the practicability of implementation).
For reasons stated previously in this document, and in the notice
of the proposed IHA (77 FR 14744, March 13, 2012), the specified
activities associated with the marine seismic survey are not likely to
cause PTS, or other non-auditory injury, serious injury, or death
because:
(1) The likelihood that, given sufficient notice through relatively
slow ship speed, marine mammals are expected to move away from a noise
source that is annoying prior to its becoming potentially injurious;
(2) The potential for temporary or permanent hearing impairment is
relatively low and would likely be avoided through the incorporation of
the required monitoring and mitigation measures (described above);
(3) The fact that pinnipeds would have to be closer than 10 m (32.8
ft) (for the 45 in\3\) or 20 m (65.6 ft) (for the 105 in\3\) in deep
water when the two GI airgun array is in use at 2 m (6.6 ft) tow depth
from the vessel to be exposed to levels of sound believed to have even
a minimal chance of causing PTS;
(4) The fact that cetaceans would have to be closer than 40 m
(131.2 ft) (for the 45 in\3\) or 70 m (229.7 ft) (for the 105 in\3\)in
deep water when the two GI airgun array is in 2 m tow depth from the
vessel to be exposed to levels of sound believed to have even a minimal
chance of causing PTS; and
(5) The likelihood that marine mammal detection ability by trained
PSOs is high at close proximity to the vessel.
No injuries, serious injuries, or mortalities are anticipated to
occur as a result of SIO's planned marine seismic survey, and none are
authorized by NMFS. Only short-term, behavioral disturbance is
anticipated to occur due to the brief and sporadic duration of the
survey activities. Table 3 in this document outlines the number of
Level B harassment takes that are anticipated as a result of the
activities. Due to the nature, degree, and context of Level B
(behavioral) harassment anticipated and described (see Potential
Effects on Marine Mammals section above) in this notice, the activity
is not expected to impact rates of recruitment or survival for any
affected species or stock. Additionally, the seismic survey will not
adversely impact marine mammal habitat.
Many animals perform vital functions, such as feeding, resting,
traveling, and socializing, on a diel cycle (i.e., 24 hr cycle).
Behavioral reactions to noise exposure (such as disruption of critical
life functions, displacement, or avoidance of important habitat) are
more likely to be significant if they last more than one diel cycle or
recur on subsequent days (Southall et al., 2007). While seismic
operations are anticipated to occur on consecutive days, the entire
duration of the survey is not expected to last more than 15 days and
the Melville will be continuously moving along planned tracklines.
Therefore, the seismic survey will be increasing sound levels in the
marine environment surrounding the vessel for several weeks in the
study area.
Of the 32 marine mammal species under NMFS jurisdiction that are
known to or likely to occur in the study area, five are listed as
endangered under the ESA: humpback, sei, fin, blue, and sperm whale.
These species are also considered depleted under the MMPA. There is
generally insufficient data to determine population trends for the
other depleted species in the study area. To protect these animals (and
other marine mammals in the study area), SIO must cease or reduce
airgun operations if animals enter designated zones. No injury, serious
injury, or mortality is expected to occur and due to the nature,
degree, and context of the Level B harassment anticipated, the activity
is not expected to impact rates of recruitment or survival.
As mentioned previously, NMFS estimates that 20 species of marine
mammals under its jurisdiction could be potentially affected by Level B
harassment over the course of the IHA. For each species, these numbers
are small (each less than one percent) relative to the regional
population size. The population estimates for the marine mammal species
that may be taken by Level B harassment were provided in Table 1 of
this document.
NMFS's practice has been to apply the 160 dB re 1 [micro]Pa (rms)
received level threshold for underwater impulse sound levels to
determine whether take by Level B harassment occurs. Southall et al.
(2007) provide a severity scale for ranking observed behavioral
responses of both free-ranging marine mammals and laboratory subjects
to various types of anthropogenic sound (see Table 4 in Southall et al.
[2007]).
NMFS has determined, provided that the aforementioned mitigation
and monitoring measures are implemented, that the impact of conducting
a marine seismic survey in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean, May, 2012,
may result, at worst, in a temporary modification in behavior and/or
low-level physiological effects (Level B harassment) of small numbers
of certain species of marine mammals. See Table 3 (above) for the
requested authorized take numbers of cetaceans and pinnipeds.
While behavioral modifications, including temporarily vacating the
area during the operation of the airgun(s), may be made by these
species to avoid the resultant acoustic disturbance, the availability
of alternate areas within these areas and the short and sporadic
duration of the research activities, have led NMFS to determine that
this action will have a negligible impact on the
[[Page 27202]]
species in the specified geographic region.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the mitigation and monitoring
measures, NMFS finds that SIO's planned research activities, will
result in the incidental take of small numbers of marine mammals, by
Level B harassment only, and that the total taking from the marine
seismic survey will have a negligible impact on the affected species or
stocks of marine mammals; and that impacts to affected species or
stocks of marine mammals have been mitigated to the lowest level
practicable.
Impact on Availability of Affected Species or Stock for Taking for
Subsistence Uses
Section 101(a)(5)(D) also requires NMFS to determine that the
authorization will not have an unmitigable adverse effect on the
availability of marine mammal species or stocks for subsistence use.
There are no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals in the study
area (offshore waters of the south-eastern Pacific Ocean off of Chile)
that implicate MMPA section 101(a)(5)(D).
Endangered Species Act
Of the species of marine mammals that may occur in the survey area,
several are listed as endangered under the ESA, including the humpback,
sei, fin, blue, and sperm whale. Under section 7 of the ESA, NSF
initiated and engaged in formal consultation with the NMFS, Office of
Protected Resources, Endangered Species Act Interagency Cooperation
Division, on this seismic survey. NMFS's Office of Protected Resources,
Permits and Conservation Division, also initiated and engaged in formal
consultation under section 7 of the ESA with NMFS's Office of Protected
Resources, Endangered Species Act Interagency Cooperation Division, on
the issuance of an IHA under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for this
activity. These two consultations were consolidated and addressed in a
single BiOp addressing the direct and indirect effects of these
interdependent actions. In May, 2012, NMFS issued a BiOp and concluded
that the action and issuance of the IHA are not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of cetaceans, pinnipeds, and sea turtles and
included an Incidental Take Statement (ITS) incorporating the
requirements of the IHA as Terms and Conditions. Compliance with those
Relevant Terms and Conditions of the ITS is likewise a mandatory
requirement of the IHA. The BiOp also concluded that designated
critical habitat of these species does not occur in the action area and
would not be affected by the survey.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
To meet NMFS's NEPA requirements for the issuance of an IHA to SIO,
NMFS prepared an ``Environmental Assessment on the Issuance of an
Incidental Harassment Authorization to the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography to Take Marine Mammals by Harassment Incidental to a
Marine Geophysical Survey in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean, May,
2012.'' This EA incorporates the NSF's ``National Environmental Policy
Act Analysis Pursuant to Executive Order 12114 of a Marine Geophysical
Survey by the R/V Melville in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean, May
2012'' and an associated report (Report) prepared by LGL for NSF and
SIO titled ``Final Environmental Analysis of a Marine Geophysical
Survey by the R/V Melville in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean off
Chile, May 2012,'' by reference pursuant to 40 CFR 1502.21 and NOAA
Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6 Sec. 5.09(d). NMFS has fully
evaluated the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on the
human environment prior to making a final decision on the IHA
application and deciding whether or not to issue a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI). After considering the final EA, the
information in the IHA application, BiOp, and the Federal Register
notice, as well as public comments, NMFS has determined that the
issuance of the IHA is not likely to result in significant impacts on
the human environment and has prepared a FONSI. An Environmental Impact
Statement is not required and will not be prepared for the action.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to SIO for the take, by Level B harassment,
of small numbers of marine mammals incidental to conducting a marine
seismic survey in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
Dated: May 2, 2012.
Helen M. Golde,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-11207 Filed 5-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P