Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, Big Stone and Lac Qui Parle Counties, MN, 27245-27246 [2012-11187]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices Status of the proposed information collection: This notice precedes a continuation of the existing burden hour request. Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. Dated: May 2, 2012. ´ Mercedes Marquez, Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. [FR Doc. 2012–11180 Filed 5–8–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R3–R–2012–N069; FXRS1265030000S3–123–FF03R06000] Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, Big Stone and Lac Qui Parle Counties, MN Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments. AGENCY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and environmental assessment (EA) for Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge, NWR) for public review and comment. In this draft CCP/EA we describe how we propose to manage the refuge for the next 15 years. DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments by June 8, 2012. We will hold an open house-style meeting during the comment period to receive comments and provide information on the draft plan. In addition, we will use special mailings, newspaper articles, internet postings, and other media announcements to inform people of opportunities for input. ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any one of the following methods: • Email: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ‘‘Big Stone Draft CCP/EA’’ in the subject line of the message. • Fax: Attention: Alice Hanley, 320– 273–2231. • U.S. Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, 44843 County Road 19, Odessa, MN 56276. • In-Person Drop Off: You may drop off comments during regular business hours at the above address. You may also find information about the draft CCP/EA planning process on the planning Web site: https:// mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:44 May 08, 2012 Jkt 226001 www.fws.gov/midwest/Planning/ BigStoneNWR/. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Hanley, 320–273–2191. Introduction With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Big Stone NWR, which we began by publishing a notice of intent in the Federal Register (73 FR 76677) on December 17, 2008. For more about the initial process and the history of this refuge, see that notice. Background The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee) (Administration Act), requires us to develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration Act. Each unit of the NWRS, including Big Stone NWR, was established for specific purposes. We use these purposes as the foundation for developing and prioritizing the management goals and objectives for each refuge within the NWRS mission, and to determine how the public can use each refuge. The planning process is a way for us and the public to evaluate management goals and objectives that will ensure the best possible approach to wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, while providing for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that are compatible with each refuge’s establishing purposes and the mission of the NWRS. Refuge Overview Big Stone NWR was established in 1975 when lands, purchased by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of the Big Stone Lake–Whetstone River Project authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, were transferred to the Service. Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Today the Refuge includes 11,586 acres and is managed for fish, wildlife, and their habitats. CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred Alternative SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 27245 Priority Issues During the public scoping process, we, other stakeholders and partners, and the public identified several priority issues, which include habitat management, sedimentation, invasive species, and demand for additional recreation opportunities and visitor services. To address these issues, we developed and evaluated the following six alternatives during the planning process. Alternative 1: Current Management/No Action Alternative 1 is the No Action alternative, which means there would be no change from current management practices. Active management of Refuge habitats and visitor services would continue at present levels. Water movement and associated sediment delivery would continue to follow its current route through the Refuge, and the quality of riverine habitat would remain within its present range of conditions. There would be no change to the management capabilities of West Pool. Remnant prairie, restored grasslands, and prairie associated with granite outcrops would continue to be managed at present levels. The amount of partially restored grasslands would increase by 500 acres. The total area of nonnative grassland would decrease to 300 acres. Wildlife observation and photography, environmental education and interpretation, hunting, fishing, trapping, and gathering shed antlers and wild edible plants are recreational opportunities that would occur under this alternative if they meet the Service definition of compatibility. Refuge staff would continue to work with visitors and local communities and provide volunteer opportunities to build support for the Refuge. Alternative 2 Under this alternative the natural alignment, channel capacity, and meander relationships would be restored to the upper 5 miles of the Minnesota River within the Refuge, and there would be an effort to improve water quality within the Minnesota River and its tributaries. Redistributing the timing and delivery of waters and sediment would improve the ability to increase, distribute, and diversify submerged vegetation within West Pool. Remnant prairie and prairie associated E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM 09MYN1 27246 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices with granite outcrops would continue to be managed at present levels. The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,100 acres, and for partially restored grasslands 1,200 acres. The amount of nonnative grassland would decrease by 500 acres. Wildlife observation and photography, environmental education and interpretation, hunting, fishing, trapping, and gathering wild edible plants are recreational opportunities that would occur under this alternative if they meet the Service definition of compatibility. Gathering of shed antlers would be discontinued. There would be increased outreach efforts to inform the public of existing Refuge access and recreational opportunities. Existing hunting opportunities would continue, and there would be added opportunities for youth and for hunters with disabilities. Fishing access and opportunities would increase beyond present levels. Refuge staff would continue to work with visitors and local communities to provide increased volunteer opportunities to build support for the Refuge. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Elements Common to Alternatives 3, 4, 5, and 6 The other four alternatives have a number of elements in common with Alternative 2. They are the same regarding Minnesota River restoration, water quality improvements, changes to West Pool, management of remnant prairie and prairie associated with granite outcrops, the range of recreational opportunities including elimination of shed antler gathering, fishing access and opportunities, and volunteer opportunities. The alternatives also differ in a number ways as indicated below. Alternative 3 The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for partially restored grassland 500 acres. The amount of nonnative grassland would decrease by 300 acres. The amount of visitor access for wildlife observation and photography would increase. Existing hunting opportunities would continue but also be reviewed to determine the need for improvements to access, facilities, or opportunities. There would be additional hunting opportunities for youth and people with disabilities. Alternative 4 The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative grassland would decrease by 500 acres, 200 acres more than under Alternative 3. The VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:44 May 08, 2012 Jkt 226001 amount of visitor access would remain at present levels, but there would be increased outreach efforts to inform the public of existing Refuge access and recreational opportunities. Existing hunting opportunities would continue. The amount of area open to hunting would remain the same, but hunting opportunities, access, and facilities would be reviewed to determine the need for improvements. There would be an emphasis on additional hunting opportunities for youth and people with disabilities. cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Charles M. Wooley, Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 2012–11187 Filed 5–8–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R8–FHC–2012–N018; FF08EVEN00– FXFR1337088SSO0L5–123] Alternative 5 The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative grassland would decrease by 500 acres. The amount of visitor access for wildlife observation and photography would increase. The amount of area open to hunting or the types of hunting permitted would increase above present levels without the emphasis described for Alternatives 2, 4, and 6. Alternative 6 (Preferred Alternative) The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative grassland would decrease by 500 acres. The amount of visitor access would remain at present levels, but there would be increased outreach efforts to inform the public of existing Refuge access and recreational opportunities. Existing hunting opportunities would continue but also be reviewed to determine the need for improvements to access, facilities, or opportunities. There would be additional hunting opportunities for youth and people with disabilities. Public Involvement We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at a public meeting. You can obtain the schedule from the address or Web site listed in this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may also submit comments anytime during the comment period. Public Availability of Comments Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability of draft revised stock assessment report for the southern sea otter in California; request for comments. AGENCY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (MMPA), and its implementing regulations, we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have developed a draft revised marine mammal stock assessment report (SAR) for the southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) stock in the State of California. We now make the SAR available for public review and comment. DATES: We will consider comments that are received or postmarked on or before August 7, 2012. ADDRESSES: If you wish to review the draft revised SAR for southern sea otter, you may obtain a copy from our Web site at https://www.fws.gov/ventura. Alternatively, you may contact the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003 (telephone: 805–644–1766). If you wish to comment on the SAR, you may submit your comments in writing by any one of the following methods: • U.S. mail: Field Supervisor, at the above address; • Hand delivery: Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office at the above address; • Fax: (805) 644–3958; or • Email: fw8ssostock@fws.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilian Carswell, at the above street address, by telephone (805–612–2793), or by email (Lilian_Carswell@fws.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background Under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and its implementing regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR part 18, we regulate the taking, possession, transportation, E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM 09MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27245-27246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11187]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R3-R-2012-N069; FXRS1265030000S3-123-FF03R06000]


Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, Big Stone and Lac Qui Parle 
Counties, MN

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and 
environmental assessment (EA) for Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge 
(Refuge, NWR) for public review and comment. In this draft CCP/EA we 
describe how we propose to manage the refuge for the next 15 years.

DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments 
by June 8, 2012. We will hold an open house-style meeting during the 
comment period to receive comments and provide information on the draft 
plan. In addition, we will use special mailings, newspaper articles, 
internet postings, and other media announcements to inform people of 
opportunities for input.

ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any 
one of the following methods:
     Email: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ``Big Stone Draft CCP/
EA'' in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: Attention: Alice Hanley, 320-273-2231.
     U.S. Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Big Stone National 
Wildlife Refuge, 44843 County Road 19, Odessa, MN 56276.
     In-Person Drop Off: You may drop off comments during 
regular business hours at the above address.
    You may also find information about the draft CCP/EA planning 
process on the planning Web site: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Planning/BigStoneNWR/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Hanley, 320-273-2191.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Introduction

    With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Big Stone NWR, 
which we began by publishing a notice of intent in the Federal Register 
(73 FR 76677) on December 17, 2008. For more about the initial process 
and the history of this refuge, see that notice.

Background

    The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as 
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 
(16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), requires us to develop a 
CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a CCP 
is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving 
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National 
Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish 
and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service 
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on 
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including 
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and 
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will 
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with 
the Administration Act.
    Each unit of the NWRS, including Big Stone NWR, was established for 
specific purposes. We use these purposes as the foundation for 
developing and prioritizing the management goals and objectives for 
each refuge within the NWRS mission, and to determine how the public 
can use each refuge. The planning process is a way for us and the 
public to evaluate management goals and objectives that will ensure the 
best possible approach to wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, 
while providing for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that 
are compatible with each refuge's establishing purposes and the mission 
of the NWRS.

Refuge Overview

    Big Stone NWR was established in 1975 when lands, purchased by the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of the Big Stone Lake-Whetstone 
River Project authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, were 
transferred to the Service. Today the Refuge includes 11,586 acres and 
is managed for fish, wildlife, and their habitats.

CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred Alternative

Priority Issues

    During the public scoping process, we, other stakeholders and 
partners, and the public identified several priority issues, which 
include habitat management, sedimentation, invasive species, and demand 
for additional recreation opportunities and visitor services. To 
address these issues, we developed and evaluated the following six 
alternatives during the planning process.

Alternative 1: Current Management/No Action

    Alternative 1 is the No Action alternative, which means there would 
be no change from current management practices. Active management of 
Refuge habitats and visitor services would continue at present levels. 
Water movement and associated sediment delivery would continue to 
follow its current route through the Refuge, and the quality of 
riverine habitat would remain within its present range of conditions. 
There would be no change to the management capabilities of West Pool. 
Remnant prairie, restored grasslands, and prairie associated with 
granite outcrops would continue to be managed at present levels. The 
amount of partially restored grasslands would increase by 500 acres. 
The total area of nonnative grassland would decrease to 300 acres. 
Wildlife observation and photography, environmental education and 
interpretation, hunting, fishing, trapping, and gathering shed antlers 
and wild edible plants are recreational opportunities that would occur 
under this alternative if they meet the Service definition of 
compatibility. Refuge staff would continue to work with visitors and 
local communities and provide volunteer opportunities to build support 
for the Refuge.

Alternative 2

    Under this alternative the natural alignment, channel capacity, and 
meander relationships would be restored to the upper 5 miles of the 
Minnesota River within the Refuge, and there would be an effort to 
improve water quality within the Minnesota River and its tributaries. 
Redistributing the timing and delivery of waters and sediment would 
improve the ability to increase, distribute, and diversify submerged 
vegetation within West Pool. Remnant prairie and prairie associated

[[Page 27246]]

with granite outcrops would continue to be managed at present levels. 
The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,100 acres, and for 
partially restored grasslands 1,200 acres. The amount of nonnative 
grassland would decrease by 500 acres. Wildlife observation and 
photography, environmental education and interpretation, hunting, 
fishing, trapping, and gathering wild edible plants are recreational 
opportunities that would occur under this alternative if they meet the 
Service definition of compatibility. Gathering of shed antlers would be 
discontinued. There would be increased outreach efforts to inform the 
public of existing Refuge access and recreational opportunities. 
Existing hunting opportunities would continue, and there would be added 
opportunities for youth and for hunters with disabilities. Fishing 
access and opportunities would increase beyond present levels. Refuge 
staff would continue to work with visitors and local communities to 
provide increased volunteer opportunities to build support for the 
Refuge.

Elements Common to Alternatives 3, 4, 5, and 6

    The other four alternatives have a number of elements in common 
with Alternative 2. They are the same regarding Minnesota River 
restoration, water quality improvements, changes to West Pool, 
management of remnant prairie and prairie associated with granite 
outcrops, the range of recreational opportunities including elimination 
of shed antler gathering, fishing access and opportunities, and 
volunteer opportunities. The alternatives also differ in a number ways 
as indicated below.

Alternative 3

    The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and 
for partially restored grassland 500 acres. The amount of nonnative 
grassland would decrease by 300 acres. The amount of visitor access for 
wildlife observation and photography would increase. Existing hunting 
opportunities would continue but also be reviewed to determine the need 
for improvements to access, facilities, or opportunities. There would 
be additional hunting opportunities for youth and people with 
disabilities.

Alternative 4

    The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and 
for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative 
grassland would decrease by 500 acres, 200 acres more than under 
Alternative 3. The amount of visitor access would remain at present 
levels, but there would be increased outreach efforts to inform the 
public of existing Refuge access and recreational opportunities. 
Existing hunting opportunities would continue. The amount of area open 
to hunting would remain the same, but hunting opportunities, access, 
and facilities would be reviewed to determine the need for 
improvements. There would be an emphasis on additional hunting 
opportunities for youth and people with disabilities.

Alternative 5

    The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and 
for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative 
grassland would decrease by 500 acres. The amount of visitor access for 
wildlife observation and photography would increase. The amount of area 
open to hunting or the types of hunting permitted would increase above 
present levels without the emphasis described for Alternatives 2, 4, 
and 6.

Alternative 6 (Preferred Alternative)

    The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and 
for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative 
grassland would decrease by 500 acres. The amount of visitor access 
would remain at present levels, but there would be increased outreach 
efforts to inform the public of existing Refuge access and recreational 
opportunities. Existing hunting opportunities would continue but also 
be reviewed to determine the need for improvements to access, 
facilities, or opportunities. There would be additional hunting 
opportunities for youth and people with disabilities.

Public Involvement

    We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at a public 
meeting. You can obtain the schedule from the address or Web site 
listed in this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may also submit comments 
anytime during the comment period.

Public Availability of Comments

    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-11187 Filed 5-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.