Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, Big Stone and Lac Qui Parle Counties, MN, 27245-27246 [2012-11187]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
Status of the proposed information
collection: This notice precedes a
continuation of the existing burden hour
request.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended.
Dated: May 2, 2012.
´
Mercedes Marquez,
Assistant Secretary for Community Planning
and Development.
[FR Doc. 2012–11180 Filed 5–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–R–2012–N069;
FXRS1265030000S3–123–FF03R06000]
Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, Big
Stone and Lac Qui Parle Counties, MN
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and
environmental assessment (EA) for Big
Stone National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge,
NWR) for public review and comment.
In this draft CCP/EA we describe how
we propose to manage the refuge for the
next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 8, 2012. We will hold an open
house-style meeting during the
comment period to receive comments
and provide information on the draft
plan. In addition, we will use special
mailings, newspaper articles, internet
postings, and other media
announcements to inform people of
opportunities for input.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any
one of the following methods:
• Email: r3planning@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Big Stone Draft CCP/EA’’ in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: Attention: Alice Hanley, 320–
273–2231.
• U.S. Mail: Attention: Refuge
Manager, Big Stone National Wildlife
Refuge, 44843 County Road 19, Odessa,
MN 56276.
• In-Person Drop Off: You may drop
off comments during regular business
hours at the above address.
You may also find information about
the draft CCP/EA planning process on
the planning Web site: https://
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
www.fws.gov/midwest/Planning/
BigStoneNWR/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Hanley, 320–273–2191.
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Big Stone NWR, which we
began by publishing a notice of intent in
the Federal Register (73 FR 76677) on
December 17, 2008. For more about the
initial process and the history of this
refuge, see that notice.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act),
requires us to develop a CCP for each
national wildlife refuge. The purpose in
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Each unit of the NWRS, including Big
Stone NWR, was established for specific
purposes. We use these purposes as the
foundation for developing and
prioritizing the management goals and
objectives for each refuge within the
NWRS mission, and to determine how
the public can use each refuge. The
planning process is a way for us and the
public to evaluate management goals
and objectives that will ensure the best
possible approach to wildlife, plant, and
habitat conservation, while providing
for wildlife-dependent recreation
opportunities that are compatible with
each refuge’s establishing purposes and
the mission of the NWRS.
Refuge Overview
Big Stone NWR was established in
1975 when lands, purchased by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers as part of the
Big Stone Lake–Whetstone River Project
authorized by the Flood Control Act of
1965, were transferred to the Service.
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Today the Refuge includes 11,586 acres
and is managed for fish, wildlife, and
their habitats.
CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred
Alternative
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
27245
Priority Issues
During the public scoping process,
we, other stakeholders and partners, and
the public identified several priority
issues, which include habitat
management, sedimentation, invasive
species, and demand for additional
recreation opportunities and visitor
services. To address these issues, we
developed and evaluated the following
six alternatives during the planning
process.
Alternative 1: Current Management/No
Action
Alternative 1 is the No Action
alternative, which means there would
be no change from current management
practices. Active management of Refuge
habitats and visitor services would
continue at present levels. Water
movement and associated sediment
delivery would continue to follow its
current route through the Refuge, and
the quality of riverine habitat would
remain within its present range of
conditions. There would be no change
to the management capabilities of West
Pool. Remnant prairie, restored
grasslands, and prairie associated with
granite outcrops would continue to be
managed at present levels. The amount
of partially restored grasslands would
increase by 500 acres. The total area of
nonnative grassland would decrease to
300 acres. Wildlife observation and
photography, environmental education
and interpretation, hunting, fishing,
trapping, and gathering shed antlers and
wild edible plants are recreational
opportunities that would occur under
this alternative if they meet the Service
definition of compatibility. Refuge staff
would continue to work with visitors
and local communities and provide
volunteer opportunities to build support
for the Refuge.
Alternative 2
Under this alternative the natural
alignment, channel capacity, and
meander relationships would be
restored to the upper 5 miles of the
Minnesota River within the Refuge, and
there would be an effort to improve
water quality within the Minnesota
River and its tributaries. Redistributing
the timing and delivery of waters and
sediment would improve the ability to
increase, distribute, and diversify
submerged vegetation within West Pool.
Remnant prairie and prairie associated
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
27246
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2012 / Notices
with granite outcrops would continue to
be managed at present levels. The target
acreage for restored grassland would be
1,100 acres, and for partially restored
grasslands 1,200 acres. The amount of
nonnative grassland would decrease by
500 acres. Wildlife observation and
photography, environmental education
and interpretation, hunting, fishing,
trapping, and gathering wild edible
plants are recreational opportunities
that would occur under this alternative
if they meet the Service definition of
compatibility. Gathering of shed antlers
would be discontinued. There would be
increased outreach efforts to inform the
public of existing Refuge access and
recreational opportunities. Existing
hunting opportunities would continue,
and there would be added opportunities
for youth and for hunters with
disabilities. Fishing access and
opportunities would increase beyond
present levels. Refuge staff would
continue to work with visitors and local
communities to provide increased
volunteer opportunities to build support
for the Refuge.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Elements Common to Alternatives 3, 4,
5, and 6
The other four alternatives have a
number of elements in common with
Alternative 2. They are the same
regarding Minnesota River restoration,
water quality improvements, changes to
West Pool, management of remnant
prairie and prairie associated with
granite outcrops, the range of
recreational opportunities including
elimination of shed antler gathering,
fishing access and opportunities, and
volunteer opportunities. The
alternatives also differ in a number ways
as indicated below.
Alternative 3
The target acreage for restored
grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for
partially restored grassland 500 acres.
The amount of nonnative grassland
would decrease by 300 acres. The
amount of visitor access for wildlife
observation and photography would
increase. Existing hunting opportunities
would continue but also be reviewed to
determine the need for improvements to
access, facilities, or opportunities. There
would be additional hunting
opportunities for youth and people with
disabilities.
Alternative 4
The target acreage for restored
grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for
partially restored grassland 700 acres.
The amount of nonnative grassland
would decrease by 500 acres, 200 acres
more than under Alternative 3. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 May 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
amount of visitor access would remain
at present levels, but there would be
increased outreach efforts to inform the
public of existing Refuge access and
recreational opportunities. Existing
hunting opportunities would continue.
The amount of area open to hunting
would remain the same, but hunting
opportunities, access, and facilities
would be reviewed to determine the
need for improvements. There would be
an emphasis on additional hunting
opportunities for youth and people with
disabilities.
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–11187 Filed 5–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–FHC–2012–N018; FF08EVEN00–
FXFR1337088SSO0L5–123]
Alternative 5
The target acreage for restored
grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for
partially restored grassland 700 acres.
The amount of nonnative grassland
would decrease by 500 acres. The
amount of visitor access for wildlife
observation and photography would
increase. The amount of area open to
hunting or the types of hunting
permitted would increase above present
levels without the emphasis described
for Alternatives 2, 4, and 6.
Alternative 6 (Preferred Alternative)
The target acreage for restored
grassland would be 1,600 acres, and for
partially restored grassland 700 acres.
The amount of nonnative grassland
would decrease by 500 acres. The
amount of visitor access would remain
at present levels, but there would be
increased outreach efforts to inform the
public of existing Refuge access and
recreational opportunities. Existing
hunting opportunities would continue
but also be reviewed to determine the
need for improvements to access,
facilities, or opportunities. There would
be additional hunting opportunities for
youth and people with disabilities.
Public Involvement
We will give the public an
opportunity to provide input at a public
meeting. You can obtain the schedule
from the address or Web site listed in
this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may
also submit comments anytime during
the comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock
Assessment Report
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft
revised stock assessment report for the
southern sea otter in California; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (MMPA), and its
implementing regulations, we, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
have developed a draft revised marine
mammal stock assessment report (SAR)
for the southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris
nereis) stock in the State of California.
We now make the SAR available for
public review and comment.
DATES: We will consider comments that
are received or postmarked on or before
August 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to review the
draft revised SAR for southern sea otter,
you may obtain a copy from our Web
site at https://www.fws.gov/ventura.
Alternatively, you may contact the
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493
Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA
93003 (telephone: 805–644–1766). If
you wish to comment on the SAR, you
may submit your comments in writing
by any one of the following methods:
• U.S. mail: Field Supervisor, at the
above address;
• Hand delivery: Ventura Fish and
Wildlife Office at the above address;
• Fax: (805) 644–3958; or
• Email: fw8ssostock@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lilian Carswell, at the above street
address, by telephone (805–612–2793),
or by email (Lilian_Carswell@fws.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.) and its implementing regulations
in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) at 50 CFR part 18, we regulate the
taking, possession, transportation,
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27245-27246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11187]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-R-2012-N069; FXRS1265030000S3-123-FF03R06000]
Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, Big Stone and Lac Qui Parle
Counties, MN
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
environmental assessment (EA) for Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge
(Refuge, NWR) for public review and comment. In this draft CCP/EA we
describe how we propose to manage the refuge for the next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by June 8, 2012. We will hold an open house-style meeting during the
comment period to receive comments and provide information on the draft
plan. In addition, we will use special mailings, newspaper articles,
internet postings, and other media announcements to inform people of
opportunities for input.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
one of the following methods:
Email: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ``Big Stone Draft CCP/
EA'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attention: Alice Hanley, 320-273-2231.
U.S. Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Big Stone National
Wildlife Refuge, 44843 County Road 19, Odessa, MN 56276.
In-Person Drop Off: You may drop off comments during
regular business hours at the above address.
You may also find information about the draft CCP/EA planning
process on the planning Web site: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Planning/BigStoneNWR/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Hanley, 320-273-2191.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Big Stone NWR,
which we began by publishing a notice of intent in the Federal Register
(73 FR 76677) on December 17, 2008. For more about the initial process
and the history of this refuge, see that notice.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
(16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), requires us to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a CCP
is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Administration Act.
Each unit of the NWRS, including Big Stone NWR, was established for
specific purposes. We use these purposes as the foundation for
developing and prioritizing the management goals and objectives for
each refuge within the NWRS mission, and to determine how the public
can use each refuge. The planning process is a way for us and the
public to evaluate management goals and objectives that will ensure the
best possible approach to wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation,
while providing for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that
are compatible with each refuge's establishing purposes and the mission
of the NWRS.
Refuge Overview
Big Stone NWR was established in 1975 when lands, purchased by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of the Big Stone Lake-Whetstone
River Project authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, were
transferred to the Service. Today the Refuge includes 11,586 acres and
is managed for fish, wildlife, and their habitats.
CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred Alternative
Priority Issues
During the public scoping process, we, other stakeholders and
partners, and the public identified several priority issues, which
include habitat management, sedimentation, invasive species, and demand
for additional recreation opportunities and visitor services. To
address these issues, we developed and evaluated the following six
alternatives during the planning process.
Alternative 1: Current Management/No Action
Alternative 1 is the No Action alternative, which means there would
be no change from current management practices. Active management of
Refuge habitats and visitor services would continue at present levels.
Water movement and associated sediment delivery would continue to
follow its current route through the Refuge, and the quality of
riverine habitat would remain within its present range of conditions.
There would be no change to the management capabilities of West Pool.
Remnant prairie, restored grasslands, and prairie associated with
granite outcrops would continue to be managed at present levels. The
amount of partially restored grasslands would increase by 500 acres.
The total area of nonnative grassland would decrease to 300 acres.
Wildlife observation and photography, environmental education and
interpretation, hunting, fishing, trapping, and gathering shed antlers
and wild edible plants are recreational opportunities that would occur
under this alternative if they meet the Service definition of
compatibility. Refuge staff would continue to work with visitors and
local communities and provide volunteer opportunities to build support
for the Refuge.
Alternative 2
Under this alternative the natural alignment, channel capacity, and
meander relationships would be restored to the upper 5 miles of the
Minnesota River within the Refuge, and there would be an effort to
improve water quality within the Minnesota River and its tributaries.
Redistributing the timing and delivery of waters and sediment would
improve the ability to increase, distribute, and diversify submerged
vegetation within West Pool. Remnant prairie and prairie associated
[[Page 27246]]
with granite outcrops would continue to be managed at present levels.
The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,100 acres, and for
partially restored grasslands 1,200 acres. The amount of nonnative
grassland would decrease by 500 acres. Wildlife observation and
photography, environmental education and interpretation, hunting,
fishing, trapping, and gathering wild edible plants are recreational
opportunities that would occur under this alternative if they meet the
Service definition of compatibility. Gathering of shed antlers would be
discontinued. There would be increased outreach efforts to inform the
public of existing Refuge access and recreational opportunities.
Existing hunting opportunities would continue, and there would be added
opportunities for youth and for hunters with disabilities. Fishing
access and opportunities would increase beyond present levels. Refuge
staff would continue to work with visitors and local communities to
provide increased volunteer opportunities to build support for the
Refuge.
Elements Common to Alternatives 3, 4, 5, and 6
The other four alternatives have a number of elements in common
with Alternative 2. They are the same regarding Minnesota River
restoration, water quality improvements, changes to West Pool,
management of remnant prairie and prairie associated with granite
outcrops, the range of recreational opportunities including elimination
of shed antler gathering, fishing access and opportunities, and
volunteer opportunities. The alternatives also differ in a number ways
as indicated below.
Alternative 3
The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and
for partially restored grassland 500 acres. The amount of nonnative
grassland would decrease by 300 acres. The amount of visitor access for
wildlife observation and photography would increase. Existing hunting
opportunities would continue but also be reviewed to determine the need
for improvements to access, facilities, or opportunities. There would
be additional hunting opportunities for youth and people with
disabilities.
Alternative 4
The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and
for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative
grassland would decrease by 500 acres, 200 acres more than under
Alternative 3. The amount of visitor access would remain at present
levels, but there would be increased outreach efforts to inform the
public of existing Refuge access and recreational opportunities.
Existing hunting opportunities would continue. The amount of area open
to hunting would remain the same, but hunting opportunities, access,
and facilities would be reviewed to determine the need for
improvements. There would be an emphasis on additional hunting
opportunities for youth and people with disabilities.
Alternative 5
The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and
for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative
grassland would decrease by 500 acres. The amount of visitor access for
wildlife observation and photography would increase. The amount of area
open to hunting or the types of hunting permitted would increase above
present levels without the emphasis described for Alternatives 2, 4,
and 6.
Alternative 6 (Preferred Alternative)
The target acreage for restored grassland would be 1,600 acres, and
for partially restored grassland 700 acres. The amount of nonnative
grassland would decrease by 500 acres. The amount of visitor access
would remain at present levels, but there would be increased outreach
efforts to inform the public of existing Refuge access and recreational
opportunities. Existing hunting opportunities would continue but also
be reviewed to determine the need for improvements to access,
facilities, or opportunities. There would be additional hunting
opportunities for youth and people with disabilities.
Public Involvement
We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at a public
meeting. You can obtain the schedule from the address or Web site
listed in this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may also submit comments
anytime during the comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-11187 Filed 5-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P