Fees for Reviews of the Rule Enforcement Programs of Designated Contract Markets and Registered Futures Associations, 26672-26674 [2012-10898]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES 26672 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations Clarksville, VA, Lake Country Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 1 Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 3 New Market, VA, New Market, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig Norfolk, VA, Norfolk Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Amdt 26A Newport, VT, Newport State, GPS RWY 36, Orig-A, CANCELLED Newport, VT, Newport State, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig Guernsey, WY, Camp Guernsey, GPS RWY 32, Orig, CANCELLED Guernsey, WY, Camp Guernsey, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 1 Guernsey, WY, Camp Guernsey, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig Torrington, WY, Torrington Muni, NDB RWY 10, Amdt 2 Torrington, WY, Torrington Muni, NDB RWY 28, Amdt 2 RESCINDED: On March 28, 2012 (77 FR 18683), the FAA published an Amendment in Docket No. 30833, Amdt No. 3470 to Part 97 of the Federal Aviation Regulations under section 97.33. The following 46 entries for Denver, CO, and 1 entry for Camden, AR, effective 31 May, 2012, are hereby rescinded in their entirety: Camden, AR, Harrell Field, VOR/DME RWY 1, Amdt 10 Denver, CO, Centennial, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 7, Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 8, Amdt 5 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 16L, Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 16R, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17L, Amdt 4 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17R, Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 25, Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 26, Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 34L, ILS RWY 34L (CAT II), ILS RWY 34L (CAT III), ILS RWY 34L (SA CAT I), Amdt 2 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 34R, ILS RWY 34R (CAT II), ILS RWY 34R (CAT III), ILS RWY 34R (SA CAT I), Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35L, ILS RWY 35L (CAT II), ILS RWY 35L (CAT III), ILS RWY 35L (SA CAT I), Amdt 5 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35R, ILS RWY 35R (CAT II), ILS RWY 35R (CAT III), ILS RWY 35R (SA CAT I), Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 7, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 8, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16L, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16R, Amdt 1 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 May 04, 2012 Jkt 226001 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17L, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17R, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 25, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 34L, Amdt 2 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 34R, Amdt 2 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35L, Amdt 2 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35R, Amdt 2 Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 7, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 8, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 16L, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 16R, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 17L, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 17R, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 25, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 26, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 34L, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 34R, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 35L, Orig Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 35R, Orig Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 26, Amdt 5 Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 35, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Front Range, NDB RWY 26, Amdt 5 Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1 Denver, CO, Front Range, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3 Denver, CO, Rocky Mountain Metropolitan, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5 [FR Doc. 2012–10727 Filed 5–4–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 17 CFR Part 1 Fees for Reviews of the Rule Enforcement Programs of Designated Contract Markets and Registered Futures Associations Commodity Futures Trading Commission. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ACTION: Notice of FY 2011 schedule of fees. The Commission charges fees to designated contract markets and registered futures associations to recover the costs incurred by the Commission in the operation of its program of oversight of self-regulatory organization rule enforcement programs, specifically National Futures Association, a registered futures association, and the designated contract markets. The calculation of the fee amounts charged for FY 2011 by this notice is based upon an average of actual program costs incurred during FY 2008, 2009, and 2010. SUMMARY: Effective Date: Each SRO is required to remit electronically the fee applicable to it on or before July 6, 2012. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Carney, Chief Financial Officer, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, (202) 418–5477, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581. For information on electronic payment, contact Jennifer Fleming, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418–5034. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Information A. General This notice relates to fees for the Commission’s review of the rule enforcement programs at the registered futures associations 1 and designated contract markets (DCM) each of which is a self-regulatory organization (SRO) regulated by the Commission. The Commission recalculates the fees charged each year to cover the costs of operating this Commission program.2 All costs are accounted for by the Commission’s Budget Program Activity Codes (BPAC) system, formerly the Management Accounting Structure Codes (MASC) system, which records each employee’s time for each pay period. The fees are set each year based on direct program costs, plus an overhead factor. The Commission calculates actual costs, then calculates an alternate fee taking volume into account, then charges the lower of the two.3 1 NFA is the only registered futures association. section 237 of the Futures Trading Act of 1982, 7 U.S.C. 16a, and 31 U.S.C. 9701. For a broader discussion of the history of Commission fees, see 52 FR 46070, Dec. 4, 1987. 3 58 FR 42643, Aug. 11, 1993 and 17 CFR part 1, app. B. 2 See E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM 07MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations calculates the fee to recover the costs of its rule enforcement reviews and examinations, based on the three-year average of the actual cost of performing such reviews and examinations at each SRO. The cost of operation of the Commission’s SRO oversight program varies from SRO to SRO, according to the size and complexity of each SRO’s program. The three-year averaging computation method is intended to smooth out year-to-year variations in cost. Timing of the Commission’s reviews and examinations may affect costs—a review or examination may span two fiscal years and reviews and examinations are not conducted at each SRO each year. As noted above, adjustments to actual costs may be made to relieve the burden on an SRO with a disproportionately large share of program costs. The Commission’s formula provides for a reduction in the assessed fee if an SRO has a smaller percentage of United States industry contract volume than its percentage of overall Commission oversight program costs. This adjustment reduces the costs so that, as a percentage of total Commission SRO B. Overhead Rate The fees charged by the Commission to the SROs are designed to recover program costs, including direct labor costs and overhead. The overhead rate is calculated by dividing total Commission-wide overhead direct program labor costs into the total amount of the Commission-wide overhead pool. For this purpose, direct program labor costs are the salary costs of personnel working in all Commission programs. Overhead costs consist generally of the following Commissionwide costs: indirect personnel costs (leave and benefits), rent, communications, contract services, utilities, equipment, and supplies. This formula has resulted in the following overhead rates for the most recent three years (rounded to the nearest whole percent): 144 percent for fiscal year 2008, 147 percent for fiscal year 2009, and 153 percent for fiscal year 2010. C. Conduct of SRO Rule Enforcement Reviews Under the formula adopted by the Commission in 1993, the Commission Actual total costs 26673 oversight program costs, they are in line with the pro rata percentage for that SRO of United States industry-wide contract volume. The calculation is made as follows: The fee required to be paid to the Commission by each DCM is equal to the lesser of actual costs based on the three-year historical average of costs for that DCM or one-half of average costs incurred by the Commission for each DCM for the most recent three years, plus a pro rata share (based on average trading volume for the most recent three years) of the aggregate of average annual costs of all DCMs for the most recent three years. The formula for calculating the second factor is: 0.5a + 0.5 vt = current fee. In this formula, ‘‘a’’ equals the average annual costs, ‘‘v’’ equals the percentage of total volume across DCMs over the last three years, and ‘‘t’’ equals the average annual costs for all DCMs. NFA has no contracts traded; hence, its fee is based simply on costs for the most recent three fiscal years. This table summarizes the data used in the calculations of the resulting fee for each entity: 3-Year average actual costs 3-Year % of volume Volume adjusted costs FY2011 Assessed fee FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 CBOE Futures .......................................... Chicago Board of Trade .......................... Chicago Climate Exchange ..................... Chicago Mercantile Exchange ................. ICE Future U.S. ....................................... Kansas City Board of Trade .................... Minneapolis Grain Exchange ................... New York Mercantile Exchange .............. North American Derivative Exchanges .... One Chicago ............................................ .................... $30,305 23,590 13,511 126,362 78,321 187,679 497,654 25,175 3,471 $519 142,446 2,129 341,186 286,289 2,888 123,566 15,948 .................... .................... .................... $87,953 .................... 882,542 94,043 227,296 .................... 596,767 .................... .................... $173 86,901 8,573 412,413 168,898 102,835 103,748 370,123 8,392 1,157 0.057 27,706 0.025 54.224 2.883 0.139 0.047 14.214 0.000 0.134 $448 218,442 4,444 548,690 102,659 52,294 52,172 274,838 4,196 1,425 $173 86,901 4,444 412,413 102,659 52,294 52,172 274,838 4,196 1,157 Subtotal ............................................. 986,069 914,972 1,888,601 1,263,214 100 1,259,607 991,247 National Futures Association ................... 1,054,392 109,639 1,206,393 790,141 .................... .................... 790,141 Total .................................................. 2,040,460 1,024,611 3,094,994 2,053,355 .................... .................... 1,781,388 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES An example of how the fee is calculated for one exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, is set forth here: a. Actual three-year average costs equal $86,901. b. The alternative computation is: (.5) ($86,901) + (.5) (.2771) ($1,263,214) = $218,442. c. The fee is the lesser of a or b; in this case $86,901. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 May 04, 2012 Jkt 226001 As noted above, the alternative calculation based on contracts traded is not applicable to NFA because it is not a DCM and has no contracts traded. The Commission’s average annual cost for conducting oversight review of the NFA rule enforcement program during fiscal years 2008 through 2010 was $790,141 (one-third of $2,370,423). The fee to be PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 paid by the NFA for the current fiscal year is $790,141. II. Schedule of Fees Therefore, fees for the Commission’s review of the rule enforcement programs at the registered futures associations and DCMs regulated by the Commission are as follows: E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM 07MYR1 26674 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 2011 Fee lesser of actual or calculated fee CBOE Futures .......................... Chicago Board of Trade ........... Chicago Climate Exchange ...... Chicago Mercantile Exchange .. ICE Futures U.S. ...................... Kansas City Board of Trade ..... Minneapolis Grain Exchange ... New York Mercantile Exchange North American Derivatives Exchange .................................. OneChicago .............................. $173 86,901 4,444 412,413 102,659 52,294 52,172 274,838 Subtotal ............................. Issued in Washington, DC, on this 1st day of May, 2012, by the Commission. David Stawick, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–10898 Filed 5–4–12; 8:45 am] 991,247 National Futures Association .... Total ................................... III. Payment Method 4,196 1,157 BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 18 CFR Part 35 [Docket No. RM11–17–000; Order No. 760] Enhancement of Electricity Market Surveillance and Analysis Through 790,141 Ongoing Electronic Delivery of Data From Regional Transmission 1,781,388 Organizations and Independent System Operators The Debt Collection Improvement Act (DCIA) requires deposits of fees owed to the government by electronic transfer of funds (See 31 U.S.C. 3720). For information about electronic payments, please contact Jennifer Fleming at (202) 418–5034 or jfleming@cftc.gov, or see the CFTC Web site at www.cftc.gov, specifically, www.cftc.gov/cftc/ cftcelectronicpayments.htm. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: In this final rule, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is amending its regulations to require each regional transmission organization (RTO) and independent system operator (ISO) to electronically deliver to the Commission, on an ongoing basis, data related to the markets that it SUMMARY: administers. Specifically, the Commission is amending its regulations to establish ongoing electronic delivery of data relating to physical and virtual offers and bids, market awards, resource outputs, marginal cost estimates, shift factors, financial transmission rights, internal bilateral contracts, uplift, and interchange pricing. Such data will facilitate the Commission’s development and evaluation of its policies and regulations and will enhance Commission efforts to detect anti-competitive or manipulative behavior, or ineffective market rules, thereby helping to ensure just and reasonable rates. DATES: Effective Date: This rule will become effective July 6, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Sauer (Technical Information), Office of Enforcement, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–6639, william.sauer@ferc.gov. Christopher Daignault (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502– 8286, christopher.daignault@ferc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents Paragraph Nos. I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................... II. Background ........................................................................................................................................................................................... III. Discussion ........................................................................................................................................................................................... A. Commission Authority and the Need for Market Data ....................................................................................................... B. Duplicative Requirements ..................................................................................................................................................... C. Confidentiality of Data .......................................................................................................................................................... D. Data Formatting ..................................................................................................................................................................... E. Web-Based Delivery ............................................................................................................................................................... F. Data Requested ....................................................................................................................................................................... G. Implementation Timeline and Phasing ................................................................................................................................ H. Ongoing Electronic Delivery ................................................................................................................................................. I. Future Specifications and Modifications of the Data and the Process for Delivery .......................................................... J. Technical Conference ............................................................................................................................................................. IV. Information Collection Statement ...................................................................................................................................................... V. Environmental Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................................... VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act .................................................................................................................................................................. VII. Document Availability ...................................................................................................................................................................... VIII. Effective Date and Congressional Notification ............................................................................................................................... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES 139 FERC ¶ 61,053 Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Philip D. Moeller, John R. Norris, and Cheryl A. LaFleur. Final Rule Issued April 19, 2012 I. Introduction (Commission) is revising its regulations to require each regional transmission organization (RTO) and independent system operator (ISO) to electronically deliver to the Commission, on an ongoing basis, data related to the markets that it administers. The Commission, acting pursuant to sections 301(b) and 307(a) of the Federal Power 1. In this final rule, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 May 04, 2012 Jkt 226001 Act (FPA),1 will amend its regulations to establish ongoing electronic delivery of data relating to physical and virtual offers and bids, market awards, resource outputs, marginal cost estimates, shift factors, financial transmission rights (FTR), internal bilateral contracts, uplift, and interchange pricing. Such data will facilitate the Commission’s 1 16 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 1 2 8 8 20 30 37 45 49 64 74 80 84 86 96 97 105 108 U.S.C. 825(b), 825f(a). E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM 07MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26672-26674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10898]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1


Fees for Reviews of the Rule Enforcement Programs of Designated 
Contract Markets and Registered Futures Associations

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of FY 2011 schedule of fees.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission charges fees to designated contract markets and 
registered futures associations to recover the costs incurred by the 
Commission in the operation of its program of oversight of self-
regulatory organization rule enforcement programs, specifically 
National Futures Association, a registered futures association, and the 
designated contract markets. The calculation of the fee amounts charged 
for FY 2011 by this notice is based upon an average of actual program 
costs incurred during FY 2008, 2009, and 2010.

DATES: Effective Date: Each SRO is required to remit electronically the 
fee applicable to it on or before July 6, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Carney, Chief Financial Officer, 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, (202) 418-5477, Three Lafayette 
Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581. For information on 
electronic payment, contact Jennifer Fleming, Three Lafayette Centre, 
1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background Information

A. General

    This notice relates to fees for the Commission's review of the rule 
enforcement programs at the registered futures associations \1\ and 
designated contract markets (DCM) each of which is a self-regulatory 
organization (SRO) regulated by the Commission. The Commission 
recalculates the fees charged each year to cover the costs of operating 
this Commission program.\2\ All costs are accounted for by the 
Commission's Budget Program Activity Codes (BPAC) system, formerly the 
Management Accounting Structure Codes (MASC) system, which records each 
employee's time for each pay period. The fees are set each year based 
on direct program costs, plus an overhead factor. The Commission 
calculates actual costs, then calculates an alternate fee taking volume 
into account, then charges the lower of the two.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ NFA is the only registered futures association.
    \2\ See section 237 of the Futures Trading Act of 1982, 7 U.S.C. 
16a, and 31 U.S.C. 9701. For a broader discussion of the history of 
Commission fees, see 52 FR 46070, Dec. 4, 1987.
    \3\ 58 FR 42643, Aug. 11, 1993 and 17 CFR part 1, app. B.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26673]]

B. Overhead Rate

    The fees charged by the Commission to the SROs are designed to 
recover program costs, including direct labor costs and overhead. The 
overhead rate is calculated by dividing total Commission-wide overhead 
direct program labor costs into the total amount of the Commission-wide 
overhead pool. For this purpose, direct program labor costs are the 
salary costs of personnel working in all Commission programs. Overhead 
costs consist generally of the following Commission-wide costs: 
indirect personnel costs (leave and benefits), rent, communications, 
contract services, utilities, equipment, and supplies. This formula has 
resulted in the following overhead rates for the most recent three 
years (rounded to the nearest whole percent): 144 percent for fiscal 
year 2008, 147 percent for fiscal year 2009, and 153 percent for fiscal 
year 2010.

C. Conduct of SRO Rule Enforcement Reviews

    Under the formula adopted by the Commission in 1993, the Commission 
calculates the fee to recover the costs of its rule enforcement reviews 
and examinations, based on the three-year average of the actual cost of 
performing such reviews and examinations at each SRO. The cost of 
operation of the Commission's SRO oversight program varies from SRO to 
SRO, according to the size and complexity of each SRO's program. The 
three-year averaging computation method is intended to smooth out year-
to-year variations in cost. Timing of the Commission's reviews and 
examinations may affect costs--a review or examination may span two 
fiscal years and reviews and examinations are not conducted at each SRO 
each year.
    As noted above, adjustments to actual costs may be made to relieve 
the burden on an SRO with a disproportionately large share of program 
costs. The Commission's formula provides for a reduction in the 
assessed fee if an SRO has a smaller percentage of United States 
industry contract volume than its percentage of overall Commission 
oversight program costs. This adjustment reduces the costs so that, as 
a percentage of total Commission SRO oversight program costs, they are 
in line with the pro rata percentage for that SRO of United States 
industry-wide contract volume.
    The calculation is made as follows: The fee required to be paid to 
the Commission by each DCM is equal to the lesser of actual costs based 
on the three-year historical average of costs for that DCM or one-half 
of average costs incurred by the Commission for each DCM for the most 
recent three years, plus a pro rata share (based on average trading 
volume for the most recent three years) of the aggregate of average 
annual costs of all DCMs for the most recent three years. The formula 
for calculating the second factor is: 0.5a + 0.5 vt = current fee. In 
this formula, ``a'' equals the average annual costs, ``v'' equals the 
percentage of total volume across DCMs over the last three years, and 
``t'' equals the average annual costs for all DCMs. NFA has no 
contracts traded; hence, its fee is based simply on costs for the most 
recent three fiscal years. This table summarizes the data used in the 
calculations of the resulting fee for each entity:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         Actual total costs              3-Year
                                                              ---------------------------------------   average    3-Year % of     Volume       FY2011
                                                                                                         actual       volume      adjusted     Assessed
                                                                  FY2008       FY2009       FY2010       costs                     costs         fee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBOE Futures.................................................  ...........         $519  ...........         $173        0.057         $448         $173
Chicago Board of Trade.......................................      $30,305      142,446      $87,953       86,901       27,706      218,442       86,901
Chicago Climate Exchange.....................................       23,590        2,129  ...........        8,573        0.025        4,444        4,444
Chicago Mercantile Exchange..................................       13,511      341,186      882,542      412,413       54.224      548,690      412,413
ICE Future U.S...............................................      126,362      286,289       94,043      168,898        2.883      102,659      102,659
Kansas City Board of Trade...................................       78,321        2,888      227,296      102,835        0.139       52,294       52,294
Minneapolis Grain Exchange...................................      187,679      123,566  ...........      103,748        0.047       52,172       52,172
New York Mercantile Exchange.................................      497,654       15,948      596,767      370,123       14.214      274,838      274,838
North American Derivative Exchanges..........................       25,175  ...........  ...........        8,392        0.000        4,196        4,196
One Chicago..................................................        3,471  ...........  ...........        1,157        0.134        1,425        1,157
                                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal.................................................      986,069      914,972    1,888,601    1,263,214          100    1,259,607      991,247
                                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Futures Association.................................    1,054,392      109,639    1,206,393      790,141  ...........  ...........      790,141
                                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................................................    2,040,460    1,024,611    3,094,994    2,053,355  ...........  ...........    1,781,388
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An example of how the fee is calculated for one exchange, the 
Chicago Board of Trade, is set forth here:

    a. Actual three-year average costs equal $86,901.
    b. The alternative computation is: (.5) ($86,901) + (.5) (.2771) 
($1,263,214) = $218,442.
    c. The fee is the lesser of a or b; in this case $86,901.

    As noted above, the alternative calculation based on contracts 
traded is not applicable to NFA because it is not a DCM and has no 
contracts traded. The Commission's average annual cost for conducting 
oversight review of the NFA rule enforcement program during fiscal 
years 2008 through 2010 was $790,141 (one-third of $2,370,423). The fee 
to be paid by the NFA for the current fiscal year is $790,141.

II. Schedule of Fees

    Therefore, fees for the Commission's review of the rule enforcement 
programs at the registered futures associations and DCMs regulated by 
the Commission are as follows:

[[Page 26674]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               2011 Fee
                                                              lesser of
                                                              actual or
                                                              calculated
                                                                 fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBOE Futures...............................................         $173
Chicago Board of Trade.....................................       86,901
Chicago Climate Exchange...................................        4,444
Chicago Mercantile Exchange................................      412,413
ICE Futures U.S............................................      102,659
Kansas City Board of Trade.................................       52,294
Minneapolis Grain Exchange.................................       52,172
New York Mercantile Exchange...............................      274,838
North American Derivatives Exchange........................        4,196
OneChicago.................................................        1,157
                                                            ------------
    Subtotal...............................................      991,247
                                                            ------------
National Futures Association...............................      790,141
                                                            ------------
    Total..................................................    1,781,388
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Payment Method

    The Debt Collection Improvement Act (DCIA) requires deposits of 
fees owed to the government by electronic transfer of funds (See 31 
U.S.C. 3720). For information about electronic payments, please contact 
Jennifer Fleming at (202) 418-5034 or jfleming@cftc.gov, or see the 
CFTC Web site at www.cftc.gov, specifically, www.cftc.gov/cftc/cftcelectronicpayments.htm.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on this 1st day of May, 2012, by the 
Commission.
David Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-10898 Filed 5-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.