Access Authorization Fees, 26213-26216 [2012-10710]
Download as PDF
26213
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 86
Thursday, May 3, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 11 and 25
RIN 3150–AJ00
[NRC–2011–0161]
Access Authorization Fees
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is proposing to amend its access
authorization fees charged to licensees
for work performed under the Material
Access Authorization Program (MAAP)
and the Information Access Authority
Program (IAAP). The amended cost is
due to an increase in the review time for
each application for access
authorization. The NRC’s formula for
calculating fees remains the same and is
based on current Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) billing rates for
background investigations. The formula
is designed to recover the full cost of
processing a request for access
authorization from an NRC licensee.
DATES: Submit comments by June 4,
2012. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the NRC is able to assure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may access information
and comment submissions related to
this proposed rule, which the NRC
possesses and is publicly available, by
searching on https://www.regulations.gov
under Docket ID NRC–2011–0161. You
may submit comments related to this
proposed rule by the following methods:
• Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2011–0161. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Email comments to:
Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you
do not receive an automatic email reply
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 May 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
confirming receipt, then contact us at
301–415–1677.
• Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301–
415–1101.
• Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
• Hand deliver comments to: 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
(Eastern Time) Federal workdays;
telephone: 301–415–1677.
You may submit comments on the
information collections by the methods
described in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document,
under the heading, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act Statement.’’
For additional direction on accessing
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Robbins, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–492–3524, email:
Emily.Robbins@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2011–
0161 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
proposed rule. You may access
information related to this proposed
rulemaking, which the NRC possesses
and is publicly available, by the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2011–0161.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this notice is
provided the first time that a document
is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2011–
0161 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure
that the NRC is able to make your
comment submission available to the
public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information in
comment submissions that you do not
want to be publicly disclosed. The NRC
posts all comment submissions at
https://www.regulations.gov as well as
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS, and the NRC does not edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information in
their comment submissions that they do
not want to be publicly disclosed. Your
request should state that the NRC will
not edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making
the comment submissions available to
the public or entering the comment
submissions into ADAMS.
Procedural Background
Because the NRC considers this action
noncontroversial and routine, the NRC
is publishing this proposed rule
concurrently as a direct final rule in the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register. The amendments
make a routine adjustment to the access
authorization fees and are of a minor
and administrative nature. Adequate
protection of public health and safety
continues to be ensured. The direct final
rule will become effective on June 22,
2012. However, if the NRC receives
significant adverse comments on the
direct final rule by June 4, 2012, then
the NRC will publish a document that
withdraws the direct final rule. If the
direct final rule is withdrawn, the NRC
will address the comments received in
response to the proposed revisions in a
subsequent final rule. Absent significant
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
26214
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
modifications to the proposed revisions
requiring republication, the NRC will
not initiate a second comment period on
this action in the event the direct final
rule is withdrawn.
A significant adverse comment is a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A
comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and
provides a reason sufficient to require a
substantive response in a notice-andcomment process. For example, a
substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff
to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position
or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue
serious enough to warrant a substantive
response to clarify or complete the
record; or
c) The comment raises a relevant
issue that was not previously addressed
or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change
or an addition to the rule, and it is
apparent that the rule would be
ineffective or unacceptable without
incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff
to make a change (other than editorial)
to the rule.
For additional procedural
information, see the direct final rule
published in the Rules and Regulations
section of this Federal Register.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 11
Hazardous materials—transportation,
Investigations, Nuclear materials,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Special nuclear material.
10 CFR Part 25
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Classified information, Criminal
penalties, Investigations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security
measures.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553,
the NRC is proposing the following
amendments to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Parts 11
and 25.
PART 11—CRITERIA AND
PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING
ELIGIBILITY FOR ACCESS TO OR
CONTROL OVER SPECIAL NUCLEAR
MATERIAL
1. The authority citation for part 11 is
revised to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act sec. 161 (42
U.S.C. 2201); Energy Reorganization Act sec.
201 (42 U.S.C. 5841); Government Paperwork
Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44 U.S.C. 3504
note).
Section 11.15(e) also issued under
Independent Offices Appropriations Act sec.
501, (31 U.S.C. 9701); Omnibus
Reconciliation Act of 1990 sec. 6101 (42
U.S.C. 2214).
Federal Register Citation: October 10,
2003; 68 FR 58792, 58800.
2. In § 11.15:
i. Add paragraph (e) introductory text;
ii. Revise paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2);
iii. Redesignate paragraph (e)(3) as
paragraph (e)(4); and
iv. Add a new paragraph (e)(3).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 11.15 Application for special nuclear
material access authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) bills the NRC for
the cost of each background
investigation conducted in support of an
application for special nuclear material
access authorization (application). The
combined cost of the OPM investigation
and the NRC’s application processing
overhead (NRC processing fee) are
recovered through a material access
authorization fee imposed on applicants
for special nuclear material access
authorization.
(1) Each application for a special
nuclear material access authorization,
renewal, or change in level must be
accompanied by a remittance, payable
to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, which is equal to the NRC
material access authorization fee. This
fee must be determined using the
following formula: the OPM
investigation billing rates on the day of
NRC receipt of the application + the
NRC processing fee = the NRC material
access authorization fee. The NRC
processing fee is determined by
multiplying the OPM investigation
billing rate on the day of NRC receipt of
the application by 55.8 percent (i.e.,
OPM rate × 55.8 percent).
(2) Updated OPM investigation billing
rates are published periodically in a
Federal Investigations Notice (FIN)
issued by the OPM’s Federal
Investigative Services. Copies of the
current OPM investigation billing rates
schedule can be obtained by contacting
the NRC’s Personnel Security Branch,
Division of Facilities Security, Office of
Administration by email to Licensee_
Access_Authorization_Fee@nrc.gov.
(3) The NRC’s Material Access
Authorization Program (MAAP) is
considered reimbursable work
representing services provided to an
organization for which the NRC is
entitled payment. The NRC is
authorized to receive and retain fees
from licensees for services performed.
The NRC’s Office of the Chief Financial
Officer periodically reviews the fees
charged for MAAP and makes
recommendations on revising those
charges to reflect costs incurred by the
NRC in providing those services. The
reviews are performed using cost
analysis techniques to determine the
direct and indirect costs. Based on this
review the MAAP fees are adjusted to
reflect the current cost for the program.
Copies of the current NRC material
access authorization fee may be
obtained by contacting the NRC’s
Personnel Security Branch, Division of
Facilities Security, Office of
Administration by email to: Licensee_
Access_Authorization_Fee@nrc.gov.
Any change in the NRC’s access
authorization fees will be applicable to
each access authorization request
received on or after the effective date of
the OPM’s most recently published
investigation billing rates schedule.
Applicants shall calculate the access
authorization fee according to the stated
formula (i.e., OPM rate × 55.8 percent)
and with reference to the following
table:
The NRC application fee for an access authorization of
type . . .
Is the sum of the current OPM investigation billing rate
charged for an investigation of type . . .
Plus the NRC’s processing
fee (rounded to the nearest
dollar), which is equal to the
OPM investigation billing rate
for the type of investigation
referenced multiplied by . . .
i. NRC–R 1 ......................................................................
NACLC—National Agency Check with Law and Credit
(Standard Service, Code C).
55.8%
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 May 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
26215
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
The NRC application fee for an access authorization of
type . . .
Is the sum of the current OPM investigation billing rate
charged for an investigation of type . . .
Plus the NRC’s processing
fee (rounded to the nearest
dollar), which is equal to the
OPM investigation billing rate
for the type of investigation
referenced multiplied by . . .
ii. NRC–R Based on Certification of Comparable Investigation.2
iii. NRC–R renewal.1
No fee assessed for most applications ..........................
................................................
NACLC—National Agency Check with Law and Credit
(Standard Service, Code C).
SSBI—Single Scope Background Investigation (Standard Service, Code C).
SSBI—Single Scope Background Investigation (Priority
Handling, Code A).
No fee assessed for most applications ..........................
55.8%
iv. NRC–U requiring single scope investigation .............
v. NRC–U requiring single scope investigation (expedited processing).
vi. NRC–U based on certification of comparable investigation.2
vii. NRC–U renewal 2 ......................................................
SSBI–PR—Periodic Reinvestigation for SSBI (Standard Service, Code C).
55.8%
55.8%
................................................
55.8%
1 If the NRC, having reviewed the available data, deems it necessary to perform a single scope investigation, the appropriate NRC–U fee will
be assessed before the conduct of the investigation.
2 If the NRC determines, based on its review of available data, that a single scope investigation is necessary, the appropriate NRC–U fee will
be assessed before the conduct of the investigation.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 25—ACCESS AUTHORIZATION
3. The authority citation for part 25 is
revised to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act secs. 145,
161, 223, 234 (42 U.S.C. 2165, 2201, 2273,
2282); Energy Reorganization Act sec. 201 (42
U.S.C. 5841); Government Paperwork
Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44 U.S.C. 3504
note); E.O. 10865, as amended, 3 CFR 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 398 (50 U.S.C. 401, note);
E.O. 12829, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 570; E.O.
13526, 3 CFR 2010 Comp., pp. 298–327; E.O.
12968, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 396;
Section 25.17(f) and Appendix A also
issued under 31 U.S.C. 9701; Omnibus
Reconciliation Act of 1990 sec. 6101 (42
U.S.C. 2214).
Federal Register Citation: November
30, 2010; 75 FR 73935, 73941.
4. In § 25.17(f):
i. Add paragraph (f) introductory text;
ii. Revise paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2);
iii. Redesignate paragraph (f)(3) as
paragraph (f)(4); and
iv. Add a new paragraph (f)(3).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 25.17 Approval for processing applicants
for access authorization.
*
*
*
*
(f) The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) bills the NRC for
the cost of each background
investigation conducted in support of an
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
application for access authorization
(application). The combined cost of the
OPM investigation and the NRC’s
application processing overhead (NRC
processing fee) are recovered through an
access authorization fee imposed on
applicants for access authorization.
(1) Each application for access
authorization, renewal, or change in
level must be accompanied by a
remittance, payable to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, which is equal
to the NRC access authorization fee.
This fee must be determined using the
following formula: the OPM
investigation billing rates on the day of
NRC receipt of the application + the
NRC processing fee = the NRC access
authorization fee. The NRC processing
fee is determined by multiplying the
OPM investigation billing rate on the
day of NRC receipt of the application by
55.8 percent (i.e., OPM rate × 55.8
percent).
(2) Updated OPM investigation billing
rates are published periodically in a
Federal Investigations Notice (FIN)
issued by the OPM’s Federal
Investigative Services. Copies of the
current OPM investigation billing rates
schedule can be obtained by contacting
the NRC’s Personnel Security Branch,
Division of Facilities Security, Office of
Administration by email to Licensee_
Access_Authorization_Fee@nrc.gov.
(3) The NRC’s Information Access
Authority Program (IAAP) is considered
reimbursable work representing services
provided to an organization for which
the NRC is entitled payment. The NRC
is authorized to receive and retain fees
from licensees for services performed.
The NRC’s Office of the Chief Financial
Officer periodically reviews the fees
charged for IAAP and makes
recommendations on revising those
charges to reflect costs incurred by the
NRC in providing those services. The
reviews are performed using cost
analysis techniques to determine the
direct and indirect costs. Based on this
review the IAAP fees are adjusted to
reflect the current cost for the program.
Copies of the current NRC access
authorization fee may be obtained by
contacting the NRC’s Personnel Security
Branch, Division of Facilities Security,
Office of Administration by email to:
Licensee_Access_Authorization_Fee@
nrc.gov. Any change in the NRC’s access
authorization fee will be applicable to
each access authorization request
received on or after the effective date of
the OPM’s most recently published
investigation billing rates schedule.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Appendix A to part 25 is revised to
read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 25—Fees for NRC
Access Authorization
The NRC application fee for an access authorization of
type . . .
Is the sum of the current OPM investigation billing rate
charged for an investigation of type . . .
Initial ‘‘L’’ access authorization 1 .....................................
ANACI—Access National Agency Check with Inquiries
(Standard Service, Code C).
No fee assessed for most applications ..........................
Reinstatement of ‘‘L’’ access authorization 2 ..................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 May 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
Plus the NRC’s processing
fee (rounded to the nearest
dollar), which is equal to the
OPM investigation billing rate
for the type of investigation
referenced multiplied by . . .
55.8%
................................................
26216
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
The NRC application fee for an access authorization of
type . . .
Is the sum of the current OPM investigation billing rate
charged for an investigation of type . . .
Renewal of ‘‘L’’ access authorization 1 ...........................
NACLC—Access National Agency Check with Law and
Credit (Standard Service, Code C).
SSBI—Single Scope Background Investigation (Standard Service, Code C).
SSBI—Single Scope Background Investigation (Priority
Handling, Code A).
No fee assessed for most applications ..........................
SSBI–PR—Periodic Reinvestigation for SSBI (Standard Service, Code C).
Initial ‘‘Q’’ access authorization ......................................
Initial ‘‘Q’’ access authorization (expedited processing)
Reinstatement of ‘‘Q’’ access authorization 2 .................
Renewal of ‘‘Q’’ access authorization 1 ..........................
Plus the NRC’s processing
fee (rounded to the nearest
dollar), which is equal to the
OPM investigation billing rate
for the type of investigation
referenced multiplied by . . .
55.8%
55.8%
55.8%
................................................
55.8%
1 If the NRC determines, based on its review of available data, that a single scope investigation is necessary, the appropriate fee for an Initial
‘‘Q’’ access authorization will be assessed before the conduct of investigation.
2 Full fee will only be charged if an investigation is required.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day
of April 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–10710 Filed 5–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0821; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–30–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
plc Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to all Rolls-Royce plc (RR)
RB211–Trent 875–17, RB211–Trent
877–17, RB211–Trent 884–17, RB211–
Trent 884B–17, RB211–Trent 892–17,
RB211–Trent 892B–17, and RB211–
Trent 895–17 turbofan engines. The
existing AD currently requires initial
and repetitive ultrasonic inspections
(UIs) of certain low-pressure (LP)
compressor blades identified by serial
number (S/N). This proposed AD would
require the same actions but expands
the population of blades. We are
proposing this AD to prevent LP
compressor blades from failing due to
blade root cracks, which could lead to
uncontained engine failure and damage
to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 2, 2012.
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 May 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc,
Corporate Communications, P.O. Box
31, Derby, England, DE248BJ, telephone:
011–44–1332–242424; fax: 011–44–
1332–245418, or email: https://
www.rolls-royce.com/contact/
civil_team.jsp. You may review copies
of the referenced service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781–238–7125.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7143; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: alan.strom@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–0821; Directorate Identifier
2010–NE–30–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On March 20, 2012, we issued AD
2012–06–23, Amendment 39–17004 (77
FR 20508, April 5, 2012), for all RR
RB211–Trent 875–17, RB211–Trent
877–17, RB211–Trent 884–17, RB211–
Trent 884B–17, RB211–Trent 892–17,
RB211–Trent 892B–17, and RB211–
Trent 895–17 turbofan engines. That AD
requires initial and repetitive UIs of
certain LP compressor blades identified
by S/N. That AD superseded AD 2011–
08–07, Amendment 39–16657 (76 FR
24798, May 3, 2011) and resulted from
RR concluding that additional blades
affected must be inspected. We issued
that AD to prevent LP compressor
blades from failing due to blade root
cracks, which could lead to uncontained
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26213-26216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10710]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2012 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 26213]]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 11 and 25
RIN 3150-AJ00
[NRC-2011-0161]
Access Authorization Fees
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is proposing to amend its access authorization fees charged to
licensees for work performed under the Material Access Authorization
Program (MAAP) and the Information Access Authority Program (IAAP). The
amended cost is due to an increase in the review time for each
application for access authorization. The NRC's formula for calculating
fees remains the same and is based on current Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) billing rates for background investigations. The
formula is designed to recover the full cost of processing a request
for access authorization from an NRC licensee.
DATES: Submit comments by June 4, 2012. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is
able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may access information and comment submissions related
to this proposed rule, which the NRC possesses and is publicly
available, by searching on https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
NRC-2011-0161. You may submit comments related to this proposed rule by
the following methods:
Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0161. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-492-
3668; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Email comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do
not receive an automatic email reply confirming receipt, then contact
us at 301-415-1677.
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission at 301-415-1101.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff.
Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (Eastern Time) Federal
workdays; telephone: 301-415-1677.
You may submit comments on the information collections by the
methods described in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document, under the heading, ``Paperwork Reduction Act Statement.''
For additional direction on accessing information and submitting
comments, see ``Accessing Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Robbins, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-492-3524, email: Emily.Robbins@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2011-0161 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this proposed rule. You may
access information related to this proposed rulemaking, which the NRC
possesses and is publicly available, by the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0161.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced in this notice is provided the first time
that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2011-0161 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information in comment submissions that you do not want to be publicly
disclosed. The NRC posts all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS, and the NRC does not edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information in their comment submissions
that they do not want to be publicly disclosed. Your request should
state that the NRC will not edit comment submissions to remove such
information before making the comment submissions available to the
public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
Procedural Background
Because the NRC considers this action noncontroversial and routine,
the NRC is publishing this proposed rule concurrently as a direct final
rule in the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register. The
amendments make a routine adjustment to the access authorization fees
and are of a minor and administrative nature. Adequate protection of
public health and safety continues to be ensured. The direct final rule
will become effective on June 22, 2012. However, if the NRC receives
significant adverse comments on the direct final rule by June 4, 2012,
then the NRC will publish a document that withdraws the direct final
rule. If the direct final rule is withdrawn, the NRC will address the
comments received in response to the proposed revisions in a subsequent
final rule. Absent significant
[[Page 26214]]
modifications to the proposed revisions requiring republication, the
NRC will not initiate a second comment period on this action in the
event the direct final rule is withdrawn.
A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient
to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For
example, a substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider)
its position or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously
addressed or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and
it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable
without incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff to make a change (other than
editorial) to the rule.
For additional procedural information, see the direct final rule
published in the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal
Register.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 11
Hazardous materials--transportation, Investigations, Nuclear
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures,
Special nuclear material.
10 CFR Part 25
Classified information, Criminal penalties, Investigations,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble and under the authority
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553, the NRC is proposing
the following amendments to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), Parts 11 and 25.
PART 11--CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR
ACCESS TO OR CONTROL OVER SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL
1. The authority citation for part 11 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act sec. 161 (42 U.S.C. 2201); Energy
Reorganization Act sec. 201 (42 U.S.C. 5841); Government Paperwork
Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note).
Section 11.15(e) also issued under Independent Offices
Appropriations Act sec. 501, (31 U.S.C. 9701); Omnibus
Reconciliation Act of 1990 sec. 6101 (42 U.S.C. 2214).
Federal Register Citation: October 10, 2003; 68 FR 58792, 58800.
2. In Sec. 11.15:
i. Add paragraph (e) introductory text;
ii. Revise paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2);
iii. Redesignate paragraph (e)(3) as paragraph (e)(4); and
iv. Add a new paragraph (e)(3).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 11.15 Application for special nuclear material access
authorization.
* * * * *
(e) The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) bills the NRC for the
cost of each background investigation conducted in support of an
application for special nuclear material access authorization
(application). The combined cost of the OPM investigation and the NRC's
application processing overhead (NRC processing fee) are recovered
through a material access authorization fee imposed on applicants for
special nuclear material access authorization.
(1) Each application for a special nuclear material access
authorization, renewal, or change in level must be accompanied by a
remittance, payable to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which is
equal to the NRC material access authorization fee. This fee must be
determined using the following formula: the OPM investigation billing
rates on the day of NRC receipt of the application + the NRC processing
fee = the NRC material access authorization fee. The NRC processing fee
is determined by multiplying the OPM investigation billing rate on the
day of NRC receipt of the application by 55.8 percent (i.e., OPM rate x
55.8 percent).
(2) Updated OPM investigation billing rates are published
periodically in a Federal Investigations Notice (FIN) issued by the
OPM's Federal Investigative Services. Copies of the current OPM
investigation billing rates schedule can be obtained by contacting the
NRC's Personnel Security Branch, Division of Facilities Security,
Office of Administration by email to Licensee_Access_Authorization_Fee@nrc.gov.
(3) The NRC's Material Access Authorization Program (MAAP) is
considered reimbursable work representing services provided to an
organization for which the NRC is entitled payment. The NRC is
authorized to receive and retain fees from licensees for services
performed. The NRC's Office of the Chief Financial Officer periodically
reviews the fees charged for MAAP and makes recommendations on revising
those charges to reflect costs incurred by the NRC in providing those
services. The reviews are performed using cost analysis techniques to
determine the direct and indirect costs. Based on this review the MAAP
fees are adjusted to reflect the current cost for the program. Copies
of the current NRC material access authorization fee may be obtained by
contacting the NRC's Personnel Security Branch, Division of Facilities
Security, Office of Administration by email to: Licensee_Access_Authorization_Fee@nrc.gov. Any change in the NRC's access
authorization fees will be applicable to each access authorization
request received on or after the effective date of the OPM's most
recently published investigation billing rates schedule. Applicants
shall calculate the access authorization fee according to the stated
formula (i.e., OPM rate x 55.8 percent) and with reference to the
following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus the NRC's processing
fee (rounded to the nearest
Is the sum of the current OPM dollar), which is equal to
The NRC application fee for an access investigation billing rate charged for the OPM investigation
authorization of type . . . an investigation of type . . . billing rate for the type of
investigation referenced
multiplied by . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i. NRC-R \1\............................ NACLC--National Agency Check with Law 55.8%
and Credit (Standard Service, Code C).
[[Page 26215]]
ii. NRC-R Based on Certification of No fee assessed for most applications... ............................
Comparable Investigation.\2\
iii. NRC-R renewal.\1\ NACLC--National Agency Check with Law 55.8%
and Credit (Standard Service, Code C).
iv. NRC-U requiring single scope SSBI--Single Scope Background 55.8%
investigation. Investigation (Standard Service, Code
C).
v. NRC-U requiring single scope SSBI--Single Scope Background 55.8%
investigation (expedited processing). Investigation (Priority Handling, Code
A).
vi. NRC-U based on certification of No fee assessed for most applications... ............................
comparable investigation.\2\
vii. NRC-U renewal \2\.................. SSBI-PR--Periodic Reinvestigation for 55.8%
SSBI (Standard Service, Code C).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If the NRC, having reviewed the available data, deems it necessary to perform a single scope investigation,
the appropriate NRC-U fee will be assessed before the conduct of the investigation.
\2\ If the NRC determines, based on its review of available data, that a single scope investigation is
necessary, the appropriate NRC-U fee will be assessed before the conduct of the investigation.
* * * * *
PART 25--ACCESS AUTHORIZATION
3. The authority citation for part 25 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act secs. 145, 161, 223, 234 (42 U.S.C.
2165, 2201, 2273, 2282); Energy Reorganization Act sec. 201 (42
U.S.C. 5841); Government Paperwork Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44
U.S.C. 3504 note); E.O. 10865, as amended, 3 CFR 1959-1963 Comp., p.
398 (50 U.S.C. 401, note); E.O. 12829, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 570;
E.O. 13526, 3 CFR 2010 Comp., pp. 298-327; E.O. 12968, 3 CFR, 1995
Comp., p. 396;
Section 25.17(f) and Appendix A also issued under 31 U.S.C.
9701; Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990 sec. 6101 (42 U.S.C. 2214).
Federal Register Citation: November 30, 2010; 75 FR 73935, 73941.
4. In Sec. 25.17(f):
i. Add paragraph (f) introductory text;
ii. Revise paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2);
iii. Redesignate paragraph (f)(3) as paragraph (f)(4); and
iv. Add a new paragraph (f)(3).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 25.17 Approval for processing applicants for access
authorization.
* * * * *
(f) The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) bills the NRC for the
cost of each background investigation conducted in support of an
application for access authorization (application). The combined cost
of the OPM investigation and the NRC's application processing overhead
(NRC processing fee) are recovered through an access authorization fee
imposed on applicants for access authorization.
(1) Each application for access authorization, renewal, or change
in level must be accompanied by a remittance, payable to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which is equal to the NRC access
authorization fee. This fee must be determined using the following
formula: the OPM investigation billing rates on the day of NRC receipt
of the application + the NRC processing fee = the NRC access
authorization fee. The NRC processing fee is determined by multiplying
the OPM investigation billing rate on the day of NRC receipt of the
application by 55.8 percent (i.e., OPM rate x 55.8 percent).
(2) Updated OPM investigation billing rates are published
periodically in a Federal Investigations Notice (FIN) issued by the
OPM's Federal Investigative Services. Copies of the current OPM
investigation billing rates schedule can be obtained by contacting the
NRC's Personnel Security Branch, Division of Facilities Security,
Office of Administration by email to Licensee_Access_Authorization_Fee@nrc.gov.
(3) The NRC's Information Access Authority Program (IAAP) is
considered reimbursable work representing services provided to an
organization for which the NRC is entitled payment. The NRC is
authorized to receive and retain fees from licensees for services
performed. The NRC's Office of the Chief Financial Officer periodically
reviews the fees charged for IAAP and makes recommendations on revising
those charges to reflect costs incurred by the NRC in providing those
services. The reviews are performed using cost analysis techniques to
determine the direct and indirect costs. Based on this review the IAAP
fees are adjusted to reflect the current cost for the program. Copies
of the current NRC access authorization fee may be obtained by
contacting the NRC's Personnel Security Branch, Division of Facilities
Security, Office of Administration by email to: Licensee_Access_Authorization_Fee@nrc.gov. Any change in the NRC's access
authorization fee will be applicable to each access authorization
request received on or after the effective date of the OPM's most
recently published investigation billing rates schedule.
* * * * *
5. Appendix A to part 25 is revised to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 25--Fees for NRC Access Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus the NRC's processing
fee (rounded to the nearest
Is the sum of the current OPM dollar), which is equal to
The NRC application fee for an access investigation billing rate charged for the OPM investigation
authorization of type . . . an investigation of type . . . billing rate for the type of
investigation referenced
multiplied by . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial ``L'' access authorization \1\.. ANACI--Access National Agency Check with 55.8%
Inquiries (Standard Service, Code C).
Reinstatement of ``L'' access No fee assessed for most applications... ............................
authorization \2\.
[[Page 26216]]
Renewal of ``L'' access authorization NACLC--Access National Agency Check with 55.8%
\1\. Law and Credit (Standard Service, Code
C).
Initial ``Q'' access authorization...... SSBI--Single Scope Background 55.8%
Investigation (Standard Service, Code
C).
Initial ``Q'' access authorization SSBI--Single Scope Background 55.8%
(expedited processing). Investigation (Priority Handling, Code
A).
Reinstatement of ``Q'' access No fee assessed for most applications... ............................
authorization \2\.
Renewal of ``Q'' access authorization SSBI-PR--Periodic Reinvestigation for 55.8%
\1\. SSBI (Standard Service, Code C).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If the NRC determines, based on its review of available data, that a single scope investigation is
necessary, the appropriate fee for an Initial ``Q'' access authorization will be assessed before the conduct
of investigation.
\2\ Full fee will only be charged if an investigation is required.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of April 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-10710 Filed 5-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P