Oregon Army National Guard, Camp Rilea, Clatsop County, OR; Danger Zone, 25952-25953 [2012-10608]
Download as PDF
25952
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: February 24, 2012.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–10572 Filed 5–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 334
Oregon Army National Guard, Camp
Rilea, Clatsop County, OR; Danger
Zone
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for comments.
ACTION:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers is proposing to establish a
new danger zone in the waters adjacent
to Camp Rilea located in Clatsop
County, Oregon. The regulation would
prohibit any activity by the public
within the danger zone during use of
weapons training ranges. The new
danger zone is necessary to ensure
public safety and satisfy the Oregon
National Guard operations requirements
for small arms training.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted by June 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number COE–
2011–0036, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: david.b.olson@usace.army.mil.
Include the docket number, COE–2011–
0036, in the subject line of the message.
Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Attn: CECW–CO (David B. Olson), 441
G Street NW., Washington, DC 20314–
1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to
security requirements, we cannot
receive comments by hand delivery or
courier.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket number COE–2011–0036. All
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 May 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
unless the commenter indicates that the
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise
protected, through regulations.gov or
email. The regulations.gov web site is an
anonymous access system, which means
we will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide
it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email directly to the Corps
without going through regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, we recommend that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If we cannot read your
comment because of technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, we may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic
comments should avoid the use of any
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed. Although listed in
the index, some information is not
publicly available, such as CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form.
Mr.
David Olson, Headquarters, Operations
and Regulatory Community of Practice,
Washington, DC at 202–761–4922 or Mr.
Steve Gagnon, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Portland District, Regulatory
Branch, at 503–808–4379.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
In
response to a request from the Oregon
Army National Guard, and pursuant to
its authorities in Section 7 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 266;
33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX of the
Army Appropriations Act of 1919 (40
Stat. 892; 33 U.S.C. 3), the Corps is
proposing to amend the regulations at
33 CFR part 334 to establish a new
danger zone. The proposed danger zone
will prohibit access to waters adjacent
to Camp Rilea during use of weapons
training ranges, thereby ensuring that no
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
threat is posed to passing water traffic
due to ricochet rounds.
Procedural Requirements
a. Review Under Executive Order
12866. The proposed rule is issued with
respect to a military function of the
Defense Department and the provisions
of Executive Order 12866 do not apply.
b. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. This proposed rule has
been reviewed under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354) which
requires the preparation of a regulatory
flexibility analysis for any regulation
that will have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities (i.e., small businesses and small
governments). Unless information is
obtained to the contrary during the
public notice comment period, the
Corps expects that this danger zone
would have practically no economic
impact on the public, and minimal
anticipated navigational hazard or
interference with existing waterway
traffic. This proposed rule, if adopted,
will have no significant economic
impact on small entities.
c. Review under the National
Environmental Policy Act. Due to the
administrative nature of this action and
because the proposed site for the danger
zone is located in the Pacific Ocean and
vessels may navigate around the
prohibited area, the Corps expects that
this regulation, if adopted, will not have
a significant impact to the quality of the
human environment and, therefore,
preparation of an environmental impact
statement will not be required. An
environmental assessment will be
prepared after the public notice period
is closed and all comments have been
received and considered.
d. Unfunded Mandates Act. This
proposed rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private
sector and, therefore, it is not a Federal
private section mandate and it is not
subject to the requirements of either
section 202 or Section 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Act. We have also
found under Section 203 of the Act, that
small governments will not be
significantly and uniquely affected by
this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger zones, Marine safety,
Navigation (water), Restricted areas,
Waterways.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Corps proposes to amend
33 CFR part 334 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(c) Enforcement. The regulations in
this section shall be enforced by the
Commanding Officer, Camp Rilea,
Oregon and such agencies as he/she
may designate.
PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND
RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR
part 334 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and
40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3).
2. Add § 334.1175 to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 334.1175 Pacific Ocean, at Camp Rilea,
Clatsop County, Oregon; Danger Zone.
(a) The area. The danger zone shall
encompass all navigable waters of the
United States as defined at 33 CFR part
329, within the area bounded by a line
connecting the following coordinates:
Beginning at latitude 46°09′00.32″ N,
longitude 123°57′52.57″ W; thence to
latitude 46°09′00.32″ N, longitude
124°01′03.92″ W; thence to latitude
46°05′25.38″ N, longitude 124°01′03.92″
W; thence to latitude 46°05′25.38″ N,
longitude 123°56′23.19″ W.
(b) The regulations. (1) No person or
vessel shall enter or remain in the
danger zone when restrictions are in
force during weapons range training
activities. At all other times, nothing in
this regulation prohibits any lawful uses
of this area.
(2) A schedule for proposed closures
of the danger zone will be furnished to
the U.S. Coast Guard, Astoria Command
Center one week in advance of range
training activities to provide local notice
to mariners. Changes to the schedule
made less than one week in advance of
the event will be transmitted to the
Astoria Command Center on the day the
change is made.
(3) At least 30 minutes prior to
restricting navigation in the danger
zone, red flags will be raised on wooden
poles immediately next to the beach at
the north and south boundaries of Camp
Rilea. The red flags will remain flying
while the ranges are in use. During night
weapons training activities, red lights
will be substituted for the flags. Closure
announcements will be broadcast over
marine VHF Channel 16/19. When range
training activities are completed, the red
flags will be removed and an
announcement made over marine VHF
Channel 16/19 that restrictions are
lifted.
(4) When restrictions are in force,
Camp Rilea will visually monitor the
danger zone using radar and guards,
equipped with binoculars and two-way
radios, posted on the beach near the
north and south boundaries of the
Camp. If a vessel is detected in the
danger zone, a cease fire will be called
on all active weapons ranges and Camp
Rilea will attempt to contact the vessel
using marine VHF radio. Cease fire will
be maintained until the vessel leaves the
danger zone.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 May 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
Dated: April 23, 2012.
Richard C. Lockwood,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory, Directorate
of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2012–10608 Filed 5–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0271; FRL–9664–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Removal of the 1980
Consent Order for the Maryland Slag
Company
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Maryland
Department of Environment to revise
the Maryland State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The revision removes a 1980
Consent Order issued to the Maryland
Slag Company (now known as
MultServ). The 1980 Consent Order is
no longer required to satisfy applicable
Federal regulations and the Clean Air
Act (CAA). In the Final Rules section of
this Federal Register, EPA is approving
the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by June 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2012–0271 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25953
B. Email: spink.marcia@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0271,
Marcia L. Spink, Associate Director for
Policy and Science, Mailcode 3AP00,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012–
0271. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25952-25953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10608]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
33 CFR Part 334
Oregon Army National Guard, Camp Rilea, Clatsop County, OR;
Danger Zone
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is proposing to establish a
new danger zone in the waters adjacent to Camp Rilea located in Clatsop
County, Oregon. The regulation would prohibit any activity by the
public within the danger zone during use of weapons training ranges.
The new danger zone is necessary to ensure public safety and satisfy
the Oregon National Guard operations requirements for small arms
training.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted by June 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number COE-
2011-0036, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: david.b.olson@usace.army.mil. Include the docket number,
COE-2011-0036, in the subject line of the message.
Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO (David B. Olson),
441 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20314-1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to security requirements, we cannot
receive comments by hand delivery or courier.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket number COE-2011-0036.
All comments received will be included in the public docket without
change and may be made available on-line at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the commenter
indicates that the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise protected, through regulations.gov or
email. The regulations.gov web site is an anonymous access system,
which means we will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
directly to the Corps without going through regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, we recommend that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If we cannot read your
comment because of technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, we may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
comments should avoid the use of any special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to www.regulations.gov. All documents in the
docket are listed. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, such as CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Olson, Headquarters,
Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, Washington, DC at 202-
761-4922 or Mr. Steve Gagnon, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland
District, Regulatory Branch, at 503-808-4379.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to a request from the Oregon
Army National Guard, and pursuant to its authorities in Section 7 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and
Chapter XIX of the Army Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat. 892; 33
U.S.C. 3), the Corps is proposing to amend the regulations at 33 CFR
part 334 to establish a new danger zone. The proposed danger zone will
prohibit access to waters adjacent to Camp Rilea during use of weapons
training ranges, thereby ensuring that no threat is posed to passing
water traffic due to ricochet rounds.
Procedural Requirements
a. Review Under Executive Order 12866. The proposed rule is issued
with respect to a military function of the Defense Department and the
provisions of Executive Order 12866 do not apply.
b. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This proposed rule
has been reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354)
which requires the preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis for
any regulation that will have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities (i.e., small businesses and small
governments). Unless information is obtained to the contrary during the
public notice comment period, the Corps expects that this danger zone
would have practically no economic impact on the public, and minimal
anticipated navigational hazard or interference with existing waterway
traffic. This proposed rule, if adopted, will have no significant
economic impact on small entities.
c. Review under the National Environmental Policy Act. Due to the
administrative nature of this action and because the proposed site for
the danger zone is located in the Pacific Ocean and vessels may
navigate around the prohibited area, the Corps expects that this
regulation, if adopted, will not have a significant impact to the
quality of the human environment and, therefore, preparation of an
environmental impact statement will not be required. An environmental
assessment will be prepared after the public notice period is closed
and all comments have been received and considered.
d. Unfunded Mandates Act. This proposed rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private sector and, therefore, it is not a
Federal private section mandate and it is not subject to the
requirements of either section 202 or Section 205 of the Unfunded
Mandates Act. We have also found under Section 203 of the Act, that
small governments will not be significantly and uniquely affected by
this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger zones, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Restricted areas,
Waterways.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Corps proposes to amend
33 CFR part 334 as follows:
[[Page 25953]]
PART 334--DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR part 334 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892 (33
U.S.C. 3).
2. Add Sec. 334.1175 to read as follows:
Sec. 334.1175 Pacific Ocean, at Camp Rilea, Clatsop County, Oregon;
Danger Zone.
(a) The area. The danger zone shall encompass all navigable waters
of the United States as defined at 33 CFR part 329, within the area
bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Beginning at
latitude 46[deg]09'00.32'' N, longitude 123[deg]57'52.57'' W; thence to
latitude 46[deg]09'00.32'' N, longitude 124[deg]01'03.92'' W; thence to
latitude 46[deg]05'25.38'' N, longitude 124[deg]01'03.92'' W; thence to
latitude 46[deg]05'25.38'' N, longitude 123[deg]56'23.19'' W.
(b) The regulations. (1) No person or vessel shall enter or remain
in the danger zone when restrictions are in force during weapons range
training activities. At all other times, nothing in this regulation
prohibits any lawful uses of this area.
(2) A schedule for proposed closures of the danger zone will be
furnished to the U.S. Coast Guard, Astoria Command Center one week in
advance of range training activities to provide local notice to
mariners. Changes to the schedule made less than one week in advance of
the event will be transmitted to the Astoria Command Center on the day
the change is made.
(3) At least 30 minutes prior to restricting navigation in the
danger zone, red flags will be raised on wooden poles immediately next
to the beach at the north and south boundaries of Camp Rilea. The red
flags will remain flying while the ranges are in use. During night
weapons training activities, red lights will be substituted for the
flags. Closure announcements will be broadcast over marine VHF Channel
16/19. When range training activities are completed, the red flags will
be removed and an announcement made over marine VHF Channel 16/19 that
restrictions are lifted.
(4) When restrictions are in force, Camp Rilea will visually
monitor the danger zone using radar and guards, equipped with
binoculars and two-way radios, posted on the beach near the north and
south boundaries of the Camp. If a vessel is detected in the danger
zone, a cease fire will be called on all active weapons ranges and Camp
Rilea will attempt to contact the vessel using marine VHF radio. Cease
fire will be maintained until the vessel leaves the danger zone.
(c) Enforcement. The regulations in this section shall be enforced
by the Commanding Officer, Camp Rilea, Oregon and such agencies as he/
she may designate.
Dated: April 23, 2012.
Richard C. Lockwood,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory, Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2012-10608 Filed 5-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P