Notice of Intent To Prepare a Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the HOPE SF Development at Potrero Terrace and Potrero Annex Public Housing Development, San Francisco, CA, 26025-26027 [2012-10580]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2012 / Notices
13).Your comments should address one
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency/component,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies/components estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
techniques or other forms of
information.
Title: Bonded Warehouse Proprietor’s
Submission.
OMB Number: 1651–0033.
Form Number: CBP Form 300.
Abstract: CBP Form 300, The Bonded
Warehouse Proprietor’s Submission, is
filed annually by each warehouse
proprietor. The information on CBP
Form 300 is used by CBP to evaluate
warehouse activity for the year. This
form must be filed within 45 days of the
end of his business year, pursuant to the
provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 66, 1311, 1555,
1556, 1557, 1623 and 19 CFR 19.12(5).
The information collected on this form
helps CBP determine all bonded
merchandise that was entered, released,
and manipulated in the warehouse. CBP
Form 300 is accessible at https://
forms.cbp.gov/pdf/CBP_Form_300.pdf.
Current Actions: CBP proposes to
extend the expiration date of this
information collection with no change
to the burden hours or to CBP Form 300.
Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Businesses.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,800.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 1,800.
Estimated Time per Response: 25
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 45,000.
Dated: April 26, 2012.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012–10522 Filed 5–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:55 May 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5637–N–01]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the HOPE SF Development at
Potrero Terrace and Potrero Annex
Public Housing Development, San
Francisco, CA
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an
EIS and to Conduct Public Scoping
Meeting.
AGENCY:
This provides notice to the
public, agencies, and Indian tribes that
the City and County of San Francisco’s
Mayor’s Office of Housing (MOH), as the
Responsible Entity in accordance with
24 CFR 58.2(a)(7), intends to prepare a
Draft Environmental Impact Report/
Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/
EIS) for the HOPE SF Development at
the Potrero Terrace and Potrero Annex
Public Housing Development (Potrero
HOPE SF Master Plan Project). The EIR/
EIS will be a joint National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) document. The EIR will satisfy
requirements of CEQA (Public
Resources Code 21000 et seq.) and the
State CEQA Guidelines (14 California
Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.),
which require that state and local
government agencies consider the
environmental consequences of projects
over which they have discretionary
authority before acting on those
projects. The proposed action is subject
to NEPA, because funding for the
project may include HUD funds from
programs subject to regulation by 24
CFR part 58; these include, but are not
limited to, Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds under Title I
of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974; Home
Investment Partnership Program
(HOME) grants under Title II of the
Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable
Housing Act of 1990 as amended;
Project Based Section 8 Vouchers under
the United States Housing Act of 1937;
and/or Section 8(o)(13) and Public
Housing operating subsidies for mixed
income developments authorized under
the U.S. Housing Act of 1937, Section
35. This notice is in accordance with the
Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500–
1508.
A Draft EIR/EIS will be prepared for
the proposed action described herein.
Comments relating to the Draft EIR/EIS
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26025
are requested and will be accepted by
the contact person listed below. When
the Draft EIR/EIS is completed, a notice
will be sent to individuals and groups
known to have an interest in the Draft
EIR/EIS and particularly in the
environmental impact issues identified
therein. Any person or agency interested
in receiving a notice and making
comment on the Draft EIR/EIS should
contact the person listed below within
30-days after publication of this notice.
This EIS will be a NEPA document
intended to satisfy requirements of
federal environmental statutes. In
accordance with specific statutory
authority and HUD’s regulations at
24 CFR part 58 (Environmental Review
Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD
Environmental Responsibilities), HUD
has provided for assumption of its
NEPA authority and NEPA lead agency
responsibility by the City and County of
San Francisco. The EIR will be a CEQA
document intended to satisfy State
environmental statutes (Public
Resources Code 21000 et seq. and 14
California Code of Regulations 15000 et
seq.).
ADDRESSES: All interested agencies,
tribes, groups, and persons are invited
to submit written comments on the
project named in this notice and on the
Draft EIS to the contact person shown in
this notice. The office of the contact
person should receive comments and all
comments so received will be
considered prior to the preparation and
distribution of the Draft EIS. Particularly
solicited is information on reports or
other environmental studies planned or
completed in the project area, major
issues that the EIS should consider,
recommended mitigation measures, and
alternatives associated with the
proposed action. Federal agencies
having jurisdiction by law, special
expertise or other special interest
should report their interest and indicate
their readiness to aid in the EIS effort as
a ‘‘Cooperating Agency.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Flannery, Environmental
Compliance Manager, City and County
of San Francisco Mayor’s Office of
Housing, 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 5th
Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103; Phone:
(415) 701–5598; Fax (415) 701- 5501;
email: eugene.flannery@sfgov.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The MOH, acting under authority of
section 104(g) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974
(42 U.S.C. 5304(g)), section 288 of the
HOME Investment Partnerships Act (42
U.S.C. 12838), section 26 of the United
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
26026
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2012 / Notices
States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C.
1437x) and HUD’s regulations at 24 CFR
part 58, in cooperation with other
interested agencies, will prepare an EIS
to analyze potential impacts of the
Potrero HOPE SF Master Plan Project.
The proposed development would be
on approximately 39 net acres in the T
2S R 5W portion of San Francisco on the
San Francisco North Quadrangle 7.5minute U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle
map. The project site is located on the
southeastern border of the Potrero Hill
neighborhood. The project site is one
and one-half blocks west of Interstate
280 (I–280), four blocks east of U.S.
Highway 101 (U.S. 101), two blocks
north of Cesar Chavez Street and is
bordered to the northwest by the Potrero
Hill Recreation Center. The eastern edge
of the site sits on a ridge paralleling
Pennsylvania Street below. The project
site is comprised of several parcels that
contain the Potrero Terrace and Potrero
Annex properties and an adjacent San
Francisco Unified School District
(SFUSD) owned property. Combined,
these parcels have a total acreage of
approximately 39 acres, including
roads. Areas of the project site have very
steep slopes. The highest topographic
elevation is to the north at the
intersection of 23rd Street and Arkansas
Street at 265 feet above mean sea level
(msl) and the lowest elevation is to the
south at the intersection of 26th Street
and Connecticut Street at 40 feet above
msl. Surrounding land uses include
residential, commercial, recreational,
and industrial uses. To the north and
northwest there are multi-family
residences, single-family residences,
and the Potrero Hill Recreation Center.
To the west are multi-family residences,
single-family residences, and Starr King
Elementary School. To the south are
industrial uses. Across Texas Street to
the east are multi-family residential,
single-family residential, and industrial
uses. The obsolete buildings that make
up the site are in need of replacement.
In addition, dead-end streets and steep
topography isolate this housing
development from the surrounding
neighborhood.
Built in two phases in 1941 and 1955,
the Potrero site is comprised of two of
the oldest public housing developments
in San Francisco, Potrero Terrace and
Potrero Annex. Together, these public
housing developments house a
population of approximately 1,200
people. The proposed project would
replace all 606 existing housing units;
incorporate additional affordable
housing and market-rate homes into the
community; and add amenities such as
open space, retail opportunities, and
neighborhood services. Including the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:55 May 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
606 public housing units, the proposed
project would build up to 1,700 homes.
The proposed project would include
buildings between three to eight stories,
and would range in height from 40 feet
to 85 feet. Development would occur in
phases to minimize disruption to
existing residents. The proposed project
would include new vehicle connections,
new pedestrian connections, a new
circulation pattern and new bus transit
stops. In addition, the proposed project
would incorporate green construction
and sustainable principles.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
There are three alternatives to the
proposed action to be analyzed in the
EIS. Alternative 1 is a variation of the
project density. Alternative sites for the
project were explored early in the
process and it was determined that no
other more viable site was available.
Alternative 1—Reduced Development
Alternative
Number of Units: 1,280.
Maximum Height: 40 feet.
Acreage: 39 acres (no change).
Percent Reduction: 25 percent.
Alternative 2—Replacement of Existing
Public Housing Units
Number of Units: 606 units.
Acreage: 39 acres.
No Community Center, No retail, no
additional open space.
Percent Reduction: 64 percent.
Alternative 3—No Project Alternative
The No Project Alternative would
analyze the ‘‘no action’’ alternative,
which would be the continuation of
uses on the site; therefore, existing
buildings and tenants would remain at
the project site and no new buildings or
uses would be constructed.
B. Need for the EIS
The proposed project may constitute
an action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment and
an EIS will be prepared on this project
by the City and County of San
Francisco’s MOH in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Responses to this notice will be used to:
(1) Determine significant environmental
issues, (2) identify data that the EIS
should address, and (3) identify
agencies and other parties that will
participate in the EIS process and the
basis for their involvement.
C. Scoping
A public EIS scoping meeting will be
held on a date within the comment
period and after at least 15 days of
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
publishing this Notice of Intent. Notices
of the scoping meeting will be mailed
when the date has been determined. The
EIS scoping meeting will provide an
opportunity for the public to learn more
about the project and provide input to
the environmental process. At the
meeting, the public will be able to view
graphics illustrating preliminary
planning work and talk with MOH staff,
and members of the consultant team
providing technical analysis to the
project. Translators will be available.
Written comments and testimony
concerning the scope of the EIS will be
accepted at this meeting. In accordance
with 40 CFR 1501.7 affected Federal,
State, and local agencies, any affected
Indian tribe, and other interested parties
will be sent a scoping notice. Owners
and occupants within a 300-foot radius
will also be notified of the scoping
process. In accordance with 24 CFR
58.59, the scoping hearing will be
preceded by a notice of public hearing
published in the local news media 15
days before the hearing date.
The scoping process associated with
the CEQA process took place from
November 2010 through December
2010. A CEQA public scoping meeting
was held on November 22, 2010.
D. Probable Environmental Effects
The following subject areas will be
analyzed in the combined EIR/EIS for
probable environmental effects: Land
Use and Planning (land use patterns,
relationship to plans/policies and
regulations; Visual Quality/Aesthetics
(views/light and glare); Socioeconomics
and Community (demographic character
changes, displacement); Environmental
Justice (disproportionately high and
adverse effects on minority and low
income populations); Cultural/Historic
Resources; Transportation and
Circulation; Noise (construction and
operational); Air Quality (construction
and operational); Greenhouse Gas
Emissions; Wind and Shadow;
Recreation; Utilities and Service
Systems (water supply, stormwater,
sewer, solid waste); Public Services
(fire, police, schools, parks); Biological
Resources; Geology/Soils; Hydrology/
Water Quality (erosion control and
drainage); Hazardous and Hazardous
Materials; Mineral and Energy
Resources; and Agriculture and Forest
Resources.
Questions may be directed to the
individual named in this notice under
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2012 / Notices
Dated: April 25, 2012.
´
Mercedes M. Marquez,
Assistant Secretary for Community Planning
and Development.
[FR Doc. 2012–10580 Filed 5–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5613–N–02]
Privacy Act: Notification of a New
Privacy Act System of Records,
Veterans Homelessness Prevention
Demonstration Evaluation Data Files
System
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notification of a New Privacy
Act System of Records.
AGENCY:
The Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD)
proposes to establish a new Privacy Act
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) System of
Records Notice (SORN) for the Veterans
Homelessness Prevention
Demonstration Evaluation Data Files
(VHPD Data Files) system. The VHPD
Data Files system will involve
collaborative efforts needed to evaluate
certain HUD homelessness prevention
programs. The demonstration evaluation
will involve data analysis from
particular jurisdictions to assist HUD’s
Office of Policy Development and
Research (PD&R) and its researchers
with examining cross-agency
coordination, expanding data collection
and analysis, conducting
comprehensive program evaluations,
and enhancing homelessness prevention
efforts. HUD’s Office of Policy
Development and Research is focusing
on data collection efforts, analysis,
research, and program evaluation to
promote better practice and outcomes in
certain homelessness prevention
programs to assist with resolving
complex matters affecting homelessness
among veterans.
DATES: Comments Due Date: June 1,
2012.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this notice to the Rules Docket Clerk,
Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–3000.
Communications should refer to the
above docket number and title. Fax
comments are not acceptable. A copy of
each communication submitted will be
available for public inspection and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:55 May 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
copying between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m., weekdays at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harold Williams, Acting Chief Privacy
Officer, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room
4156, Washington, DC 20410,
Telephone Number (202) 402–8087.
(This is not a toll-free number.) A
telecommunication device for hearingand speech-impaired individuals (TTY)
is available at (800) 877–8339 (Federal
Information Relay Service).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a
(e)(4) and (11), as amended, notice is
given that HUD proposes to establish a
new system of records identified as the
Veterans Homelessness Prevention
Demonstration Evaluation Data Files
(VHPD Data Files) system. Title 5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4) and (11) provide that the
public be afforded a 30-day period in
which to comment on the new system
of records.
The new system report was submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), the Senate Committee on
Governmental Affairs, and the House
Committee on Government Reform
pursuant to Paragraph 4c of Appendix 1
to OMB Circular No. A–130, ‘‘Federal
Responsibilities for Maintaining
Records About Individuals,’’ July 25,
1994 (59 FR 37914).
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a 88 Stat. 1896;
42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
Dated: April 25, 2012.
Jerry E. Williams,
Chief Information Officer.
HUD/PD&R.01
SYSTEM NAME:
Veterans Homelessness Prevention
Demonstration Evaluation Data Files
System (VHPD Data Files).
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Silber & Associates, 13067 Twelve
Hills Road, Suite B Clarksville,
Maryland 21029–1144; Urban Institute,
2100 M Street NW., Washington, DC
20037.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Persons enrolled in VHPD, the
Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program (HPRP), and Veterans
Affairs medical service centers.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Some but not all records under this
System of Records Notice will be
derived from the Homeless Management
Information System (HMIS) and the
Veteran Affairs Medical Centers
(VAMC) records that collect homeless
data. Other records, including personal
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26027
and sensitive information, will be
obtained from persons enrolled in
VHPD, as follows: name, social security
number, participant study unique ID,
date of birth, home address, home
telephone, and personal email address,
as well as names and contact
information for up to three friends and/
or family members. The dataset will also
contain sensitive information, including
race/ethnicity, gender, marital status,
spouse’s name, number of children,
income and financial data (earned
income, benefit receipt, including
Supplementary Social Security Income,
Social Security Disability Insurance,
Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families and other benefits, and assets),
employment history, educational level,
medical history and information,
disability, criminal record, residential
history, homeless program utilization,
barriers to housing, and veteran status.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
Housing and Urban Development Act
of 1970, Section 502 (Pub. L. 91–609; 84
Stat. 1784; 12 U.S.C. 1701z–1 et seq.)
PURPOSES:
The system of records will enable
evaluation of the Veterans
Homelessness Prevention
Demonstration. The Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA) issued by HUD
stated that ‘‘the evaluation will include
an in-depth exploration of programs
developed in each of the five sites.’’ The
five sites are: Camp Pendleton (San
Diego, CA); Fort Hood (Killeen, TX);
Fort Drum (Watertown, NY); Joint Base
Lewis-McChord (Tacoma, WA); MacDill
Air Force Base (Tampa, FL). The Notice
directs the evaluation to focus particular
attention ‘‘on the structure and
effectiveness’’ of collaboration at the
local level between the local Continuum
of Care grantee, the Veterans
Administration and the Department of
Labor. The evaluation will assess the
effectiveness of homelessness
prevention assistance delivered through
this demonstration program; outcomes
of interest include housing stability,
earnings, employment, and access to
health services. Further, the evaluation
will investigate the unique needs of new
cohorts of veterans, especially veterans
of Operation Enduring Freedom and
Operation Iraqi Freedom, particular
types of veterans, such as female
veterans, members of the National
Guard and Reserve, military families
and veterans with combat-related risk
factors. To measure the effectiveness of
the program, the evaluation will follow
veterans and their families after program
completion and ascertain if there have
been any improvements in measures of
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26025-26027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10580]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5637-N-01]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the HOPE SF Development at Potrero Terrace and Potrero Annex
Public Housing Development, San Francisco, CA
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS and to Conduct Public
Scoping Meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This provides notice to the public, agencies, and Indian
tribes that the City and County of San Francisco's Mayor's Office of
Housing (MOH), as the Responsible Entity in accordance with 24 CFR
58.2(a)(7), intends to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report/
Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the HOPE SF Development at
the Potrero Terrace and Potrero Annex Public Housing Development
(Potrero HOPE SF Master Plan Project). The EIR/EIS will be a joint
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) document. The EIR will satisfy requirements of CEQA
(Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14
California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.), which require that state
and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences
of projects over which they have discretionary authority before acting
on those projects. The proposed action is subject to NEPA, because
funding for the project may include HUD funds from programs subject to
regulation by 24 CFR part 58; these include, but are not limited to,
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds under Title I of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; Home Investment
Partnership Program (HOME) grants under Title II of the Cranston-
Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 as amended; Project
Based Section 8 Vouchers under the United States Housing Act of 1937;
and/or Section 8(o)(13) and Public Housing operating subsidies for
mixed income developments authorized under the U.S. Housing Act of
1937, Section 35. This notice is in accordance with the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508.
A Draft EIR/EIS will be prepared for the proposed action described
herein. Comments relating to the Draft EIR/EIS are requested and will
be accepted by the contact person listed below. When the Draft EIR/EIS
is completed, a notice will be sent to individuals and groups known to
have an interest in the Draft EIR/EIS and particularly in the
environmental impact issues identified therein. Any person or agency
interested in receiving a notice and making comment on the Draft EIR/
EIS should contact the person listed below within 30-days after
publication of this notice.
This EIS will be a NEPA document intended to satisfy requirements
of federal environmental statutes. In accordance with specific
statutory authority and HUD's regulations at 24 CFR part 58
(Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD
Environmental Responsibilities), HUD has provided for assumption of its
NEPA authority and NEPA lead agency responsibility by the City and
County of San Francisco. The EIR will be a CEQA document intended to
satisfy State environmental statutes (Public Resources Code 21000 et
seq. and 14 California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.).
ADDRESSES: All interested agencies, tribes, groups, and persons are
invited to submit written comments on the project named in this notice
and on the Draft EIS to the contact person shown in this notice. The
office of the contact person should receive comments and all comments
so received will be considered prior to the preparation and
distribution of the Draft EIS. Particularly solicited is information on
reports or other environmental studies planned or completed in the
project area, major issues that the EIS should consider, recommended
mitigation measures, and alternatives associated with the proposed
action. Federal agencies having jurisdiction by law, special expertise
or other special interest should report their interest and indicate
their readiness to aid in the EIS effort as a ``Cooperating Agency.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Flannery, Environmental
Compliance Manager, City and County of San Francisco Mayor's Office of
Housing, 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103;
Phone: (415) 701-5598; Fax (415) 701- 5501; email:
eugene.flannery@sfgov.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The MOH, acting under authority of section 104(g) of the Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5304(g)), section 288
of the HOME Investment Partnerships Act (42 U.S.C. 12838), section 26
of the United
[[Page 26026]]
States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437x) and HUD's regulations at
24 CFR part 58, in cooperation with other interested agencies, will
prepare an EIS to analyze potential impacts of the Potrero HOPE SF
Master Plan Project.
The proposed development would be on approximately 39 net acres in
the T 2S R 5W portion of San Francisco on the San Francisco North
Quadrangle 7.5-minute U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle map. The project
site is located on the southeastern border of the Potrero Hill
neighborhood. The project site is one and one-half blocks west of
Interstate 280 (I-280), four blocks east of U.S. Highway 101 (U.S.
101), two blocks north of Cesar Chavez Street and is bordered to the
northwest by the Potrero Hill Recreation Center. The eastern edge of
the site sits on a ridge paralleling Pennsylvania Street below. The
project site is comprised of several parcels that contain the Potrero
Terrace and Potrero Annex properties and an adjacent San Francisco
Unified School District (SFUSD) owned property. Combined, these parcels
have a total acreage of approximately 39 acres, including roads. Areas
of the project site have very steep slopes. The highest topographic
elevation is to the north at the intersection of 23rd Street and
Arkansas Street at 265 feet above mean sea level (msl) and the lowest
elevation is to the south at the intersection of 26th Street and
Connecticut Street at 40 feet above msl. Surrounding land uses include
residential, commercial, recreational, and industrial uses. To the
north and northwest there are multi-family residences, single-family
residences, and the Potrero Hill Recreation Center. To the west are
multi-family residences, single-family residences, and Starr King
Elementary School. To the south are industrial uses. Across Texas
Street to the east are multi-family residential, single-family
residential, and industrial uses. The obsolete buildings that make up
the site are in need of replacement. In addition, dead-end streets and
steep topography isolate this housing development from the surrounding
neighborhood.
Built in two phases in 1941 and 1955, the Potrero site is comprised
of two of the oldest public housing developments in San Francisco,
Potrero Terrace and Potrero Annex. Together, these public housing
developments house a population of approximately 1,200 people. The
proposed project would replace all 606 existing housing units;
incorporate additional affordable housing and market-rate homes into
the community; and add amenities such as open space, retail
opportunities, and neighborhood services. Including the 606 public
housing units, the proposed project would build up to 1,700 homes. The
proposed project would include buildings between three to eight
stories, and would range in height from 40 feet to 85 feet. Development
would occur in phases to minimize disruption to existing residents. The
proposed project would include new vehicle connections, new pedestrian
connections, a new circulation pattern and new bus transit stops. In
addition, the proposed project would incorporate green construction and
sustainable principles.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
There are three alternatives to the proposed action to be analyzed
in the EIS. Alternative 1 is a variation of the project density.
Alternative sites for the project were explored early in the process
and it was determined that no other more viable site was available.
Alternative 1--Reduced Development Alternative
Number of Units: 1,280.
Maximum Height: 40 feet.
Acreage: 39 acres (no change).
Percent Reduction: 25 percent.
Alternative 2--Replacement of Existing Public Housing Units
Number of Units: 606 units.
Acreage: 39 acres.
No Community Center, No retail, no additional open space.
Percent Reduction: 64 percent.
Alternative 3--No Project Alternative
The No Project Alternative would analyze the ``no action''
alternative, which would be the continuation of uses on the site;
therefore, existing buildings and tenants would remain at the project
site and no new buildings or uses would be constructed.
B. Need for the EIS
The proposed project may constitute an action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment and an EIS will be
prepared on this project by the City and County of San Francisco's MOH
in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Responses to this notice will be used to: (1)
Determine significant environmental issues, (2) identify data that the
EIS should address, and (3) identify agencies and other parties that
will participate in the EIS process and the basis for their
involvement.
C. Scoping
A public EIS scoping meeting will be held on a date within the
comment period and after at least 15 days of publishing this Notice of
Intent. Notices of the scoping meeting will be mailed when the date has
been determined. The EIS scoping meeting will provide an opportunity
for the public to learn more about the project and provide input to the
environmental process. At the meeting, the public will be able to view
graphics illustrating preliminary planning work and talk with MOH
staff, and members of the consultant team providing technical analysis
to the project. Translators will be available. Written comments and
testimony concerning the scope of the EIS will be accepted at this
meeting. In accordance with 40 CFR 1501.7 affected Federal, State, and
local agencies, any affected Indian tribe, and other interested parties
will be sent a scoping notice. Owners and occupants within a 300-foot
radius will also be notified of the scoping process. In accordance with
24 CFR 58.59, the scoping hearing will be preceded by a notice of
public hearing published in the local news media 15 days before the
hearing date.
The scoping process associated with the CEQA process took place
from November 2010 through December 2010. A CEQA public scoping meeting
was held on November 22, 2010.
D. Probable Environmental Effects
The following subject areas will be analyzed in the combined EIR/
EIS for probable environmental effects: Land Use and Planning (land use
patterns, relationship to plans/policies and regulations; Visual
Quality/Aesthetics (views/light and glare); Socioeconomics and
Community (demographic character changes, displacement); Environmental
Justice (disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority and
low income populations); Cultural/Historic Resources; Transportation
and Circulation; Noise (construction and operational); Air Quality
(construction and operational); Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Wind and
Shadow; Recreation; Utilities and Service Systems (water supply,
stormwater, sewer, solid waste); Public Services (fire, police,
schools, parks); Biological Resources; Geology/Soils; Hydrology/Water
Quality (erosion control and drainage); Hazardous and Hazardous
Materials; Mineral and Energy Resources; and Agriculture and Forest
Resources.
Questions may be directed to the individual named in this notice
under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
[[Page 26027]]
Dated: April 25, 2012.
Mercedes M. M[aacute]rquez,
Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2012-10580 Filed 5-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P