Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; Victoza, 26018-26019 [2012-10517]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
26018
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2012 / Notices
a letter dated February 17, 2011, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human biological
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
KALBITOR represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the Patent
and Trademark Office requested that
FDA determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
KALBITOR is 2,855 days. Of this time,
2,420 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 435 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
February 8, 2002. FDA has verified the
applicant’s claim that the date the
investigational new drug application
became effective was on February 8,
2002.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): September 23, 2008. FDA
has verified the applicant’s claim that
the biologics license application (BLA)
for KALBITOR (BLA 125277/0) was
initially submitted on September 23,
2008.
3. The date the application was
approved: December 1, 2009. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125277/0 was approved on December 1,
2009.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its applications for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,645 days and 178
days of patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments and ask
for a redetermination by July 2, 2012.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 24, 2012. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:55 May 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and written petitions. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. However, if you submit a
written petition, you must submit three
copies of the petition. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
Comments and petitions that have not
been made publicly available on
https://www.regulations.gov may be
viewed in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: April 16, 2012.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2012–10518 Filed 5–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–E–0114]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; Victoza
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for Victoza
and is publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://www.regulations.
gov. Submit written petitions along with
three copies and written comments to
the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6284, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417)
and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent
Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product VICTOZA
(liraglutide (rDNA origin)). VICTOZA is
indicated as an adjunct to diet and
exercise to improve glycemic control in
adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for Victoza
(U.S. Patent No. 6,268,343) from Novo
Nordisk A/S, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated April 25, 2011, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of Victoza
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
Victoza is 3,370 days. Of this time,
2,757 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
26019
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2012 / Notices
while 613 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
November 5, 2000. The applicant claims
October 5, 2000, as the date the
investigational new drug application
(IND) became effective. However, FDA
records indicate that the IND effective
date was November 5, 2000, which was
30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the FD&C Act: May 23, 2008.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the new drug application (NDA) for
Victoza (NDA 22–341) was initially
submitted on May 23, 2008.
3. The date the application was
approved: January 25, 2010. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–341 was approved on January 25,
2010.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,826 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments and ask
for a redetermination by July 2, 2012.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 24, 2012. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and written petitions. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. However, if you submit a
written petition, you must submit three
copies of the petition. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
Comments and petitions that have not
been made publicly available on
https://www.regulations.gov may be
viewed in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: April 16, 2012.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2012–10517 Filed 5–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for
Children Program
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of a non-competitive
one-year extension with funds for the
National Healthy Tomorrows Technical
Assistance Resource Center (U50).
AGENCY:
Cooperative
agreement
number
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) .................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CFDA Number: 93.110.
Current Project Period: 9/1/2011
through 8/31/2012.
Period of Supplemental Funding: 9/1/
2012 through 8/31/2013.
Authority: Title V of the Social Security
Act, Section 501(a)(2), (42 U.S.C. 701 (a)(2)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:55 May 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
Recipient
of record and intended award amount
is:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA) will be
SUMMARY:
Organization name
Amount of the Award: Up to $176,855
for one recipient over a one-year project
period.
issuing a non-competitive one-year
extension with funds for the National
Healthy Tomorrows Technical
Assistance Resource Center at the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
Up to $176,855 will be awarded over a
one-year extended project period. The
National Healthy Tomorrows Technical
Assistance Resource Center provides
support for the activities of the Healthy
Tomorrows Partnership for Children
Program (HTPCP), community-based
grants that address priority issues
determined by the community. Through
a cooperative agreement, the Resource
Center also offers consultation to
HTPCP program participants to ensure
successful implementation and
sustainability of community-based
initiatives; facilitates involvement of
local partners such as pediatricians,
State/local AAP chapters, State/local
maternal and child health agencies, and
other private sector partners in HTPCP
projects to promote successful
implementation of community-based
maternal and child health initiatives;
and conducts a national evaluation of
HTPCP projects that assesses critical
factors contributing to program
sustainability, effectiveness and impact
of community-based projects post
HTPCP funding, and the ability of
projects to develop meaningful
evaluation and sustainability plans. A
2005 national evaluation found that 80
percent of HTPCP projects are fully or
partially sustained 5 years post-Federal
funding. The proposed extension with
funds will allow the Maternal and Child
Health Bureau (MCHB) to align the
National Healthy Tomorrows Technical
Assistance Resource Center with the
National Center for Medical Home
Implementation.
U50MC07618
Justification
Over 75 percent of Healthy
Tomorrows projects are involved in case
management/care coordination or
establishing a medical home in
underserved and vulnerable
communities. HTPCP has long
encouraged Healthy Tomorrows projects
involved in case management/care
coordination or medical home to adopt
the medical home model, so the
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FY2011 Authorized funding level
FY2012 Estimated
funding level
$176,855
State
$176,855
IL
combination of these investments
achieves efficiencies. The National
Healthy Tomorrows Technical
Assistance Resource Center provides
resources to grantees interested in
medical home implementation, but has
limited capacity to offer detailed
technical assistance to grantees
assessing the benefits and challenges of
implementing a meaningful medical
home in communities with finite
resources. A strategic partnership with
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26018-26019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10517]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-E-0114]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; Victoza
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for Victoza and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written petitions along with three copies and written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6284, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product VICTOZA
(liraglutide (rDNA origin)). VICTOZA is indicated as an adjunct to diet
and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes
mellitus. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office
received a patent term restoration application for Victoza (U.S. Patent
No. 6,268,343) from Novo Nordisk A/S, and the Patent and Trademark
Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's
eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated April 25,
2011, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval
of Victoza represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
Victoza is 3,370 days. Of this time, 2,757 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period,
[[Page 26019]]
while 613 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of
time were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became
effective: November 5, 2000. The applicant claims October 5, 2000, as
the date the investigational new drug application (IND) became
effective. However, FDA records indicate that the IND effective date
was November 5, 2000, which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the FD&C Act: May 23,
2008. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) for Victoza (NDA 22-341) was initially submitted on
May 23, 2008.
3. The date the application was approved: January 25, 2010. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-341 was approved on January
25, 2010.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,826 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 2, 2012. Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period
by October 24, 2012. To meet its burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written petitions.
It is only necessary to send one set of comments. However, if you
submit a written petition, you must submit three copies of the
petition. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document.
Comments and petitions that have not been made publicly available
on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: April 16, 2012.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2012-10517 Filed 5-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P