Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Potomac River, National Harbor Access Channel, MD, 25106-25109 [2012-10252]

Download as PDF 25106 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS makes a report to the time the airline provides its mishandled baggage data to DOT. • How could the aforementioned systems and processes be adapted to accommodate the proposed reporting requirement? • What new systems and processes would be necessary for carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement? • What other resource requirements, e.g. additional personnel and training, would be necessary for carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement? • What would be the dollar cost of adjustments to existing systems and processes, new systems and processes, and other resource requirements? • The Department assumes that, as a matter of good business practice, airlines already gather and maintain information on the total number of counter-checked bags, gate-checked bags, and valet bags transported in the aircraft compartment. Under this assumption, the costs of compliance would include the adaption of the current reporting systems and processes (or, if they do not exist, the development and implementation of new systems and processes) that gather existing data for the new reporting requirements, in addition to any recurring annual expenses (e.g. staff time) for developing such reports. We are interested in learning if our assumption about current industry practice is inaccurate. • How much lead time is necessary to implement the proposed reporting requirement? • Is there any other information that the Department should consider regarding the metric used to calculate mishandled baggage rates? 3. The Reporting of Mishandled Wheelchairs and Scooters • What is the current industry practice regarding processing and accounting for wheelchairs and scooters that are checked at the check-in counter, at the self-service bag drop, at the gate, or at the aircraft door? Are they accounted for separately from other baggage? The Department would like to understand the entire process from what happens on the ground and the associated data systems when passengers check their wheelchairs or scooters, to what happens on the ground and the associated data systems when passengers claim the assistive device upon arrival whether that is at the baggage carousel, the gate or jet bridge. • What are the existing processes and data systems associated with reporting VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Apr 26, 2012 Jkt 226001 mishandled wheelchairs and scooters transported in the cargo hold? • How could the aforementioned systems and processes be adapted to accommodate the proposed reporting requirement? • What new systems and processes would be necessary for carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement? • What other resource requirements, e.g. additional personnel and training, would be necessary for carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement? • What would be the dollar cost of adjustments to existing systems and processes, new systems and processes, and other resource requirements? • The Department assumes that, as a matter of good business practice, airlines already gather and maintain information on damage, delay, and loss of wheelchairs and scooters transported in the aircraft cargo compartment. Under this assumption, the costs of compliance would include the adaption of the current reporting systems and processes (or, if they do not exist, the development and implementation of new systems and processes) that gather existing data for the new reporting requirements, in addition to any recurring annual expenses (e.g. staff time) for developing such reports. We are interested in learning if our assumption about current industry practice is inaccurate. • How much lead time is necessary to implement the proposed reporting requirement? • Is there any other information that the Department should consider regarding the reporting of mishandled wheelchairs and scooters? Issued in Washington, DC, on April 23, 2012. Pat Hu, Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local regulations during the ‘‘Swim Across the Potomac River’’ swimming competition, to be held on the waters of the Potomac River on July 8, 2012. These special local regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is intended to temporarily restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the Potomac River during the event. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 29, 2012. The Coast Guard anticipates that this proposed rule will be effective and enforced on July 8, 2012. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2012–0276 using any one of the following methods: (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. (2) Fax: 202–493–2251. (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 0001. (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting comments. SUMMARY: Coast Guard If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD; telephone 410–576–2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 33 CFR Part 100 Public Participation and Request for Comments [FR Doc. 2012–10179 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–HY–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [Docket No. USCG–2012–0276] RIN 1625–AA08 Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Potomac River, National Harbor Access Channel, MD AGENCY: PO 00000 Coast Guard, DHS. Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Submitting Comments If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at https:// www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the line associated with this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period and may change the rule based on your comments. Viewing Comments and Documents To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility. Privacy Act Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any of VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Apr 26, 2012 Jkt 226001 our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316). Public Meeting We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a request for one on or before the end of the comment period, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register. Basis and Purpose On July 8, 2012, the National Harbor Marina of Oxon Hill, Maryland, will sponsor a swimming competition across the Potomac River between Alexandria, Virginia and Oxon Hill, Maryland. The event consists of up to 250 swimmers on a 1.3-mile linear course located downriver from the Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I–495/I–95) Bridge. The swimmers will be supported by sponsor-provided watercraft. The start will be located at North Point in Jones Point Park and the finish will be located along the shore at National Harbor Marina. Portions of the swim course will cross the Potomac River federal navigation channel and the National Harbor Access Channel. Due to the need for vessel control during the event, the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the event area to provide for the safety of participants, spectators and other transiting vessels. Discussion of Proposed Rule The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local regulations on specified waters of the Potomac River. The regulations will be in effect from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. on July 8, 2012. The regulated area, approximately 1,900 yards in length and 350 yards in width, extends across the entire width of the Potomac River between the Virginia and Maryland shorelines and includes all waters of the Potomac River, within lines connecting the following positions: From latitude 38°47′35″ N, longitude 077°02′22″ W, thence to latitude 38°47′12″ N, longitude 077°00′57″ W, and from latitude 38°47′24″ N, longitude 077°03′03″ W to latitude 38°46′54″ N, longitude 077°01′09″ W. The effect of this proposed rule will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area during PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 25107 the event. Vessels intending to transit the Potomac River through the regulated area, including the National Harbor Access Channel, will only be allowed to safely transit the regulated area when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander has deemed it safe to do so. These regulations are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to enhance the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders. Regulatory Planning and Review This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Although this regulation will prevent traffic from transiting portions of the Potomac River and National Harbor Access Channel during the event, the effect of this regulation will not be significant due to the limited duration that the regulated area will be in effect and the extensive advance notifications that will be made to the maritime community via the Local Notice to Mariners and marine information broadcasts, so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly. Additionally, the regulated area has been narrowly tailored to impose the least impact on general navigation yet provide the level of safety deemed necessary. Vessel traffic will be able to transit safely through a portion of the regulated area, but only after the last participant has cleared that portion of the regulated area and when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems it safe to do so. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1 25108 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the effected portion of the Potomac River, including and National Harbor Access Channel, during the event. Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting portions of the Potomac River and the National Harbor Access Channel during the event, this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This proposed rule would be in effect for only a limited period. Though the regulated area extends across the entire width of the river, vessel traffic may be permitted to safely transit a portion of the regulated area, but only after all participants have safely cleared that portion of the regulated area and when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems it safe for vessel traffic to do so. All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Before the enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. Collection of Information This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this Taking of Private Property This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Apr 26, 2012 Jkt 226001 Protection of Children We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects This proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. Technical Standards This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR Part 100 applicable to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United States that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore side activities in the event area. The category of water activities includes but is not limited to sail boat regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew racing, canoe and sail board racing. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waterways. E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS 1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows: FM marine band radio announcing specific event date and times. (d) Enforcement period: This section will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 11 a.m. on July 8, 2012. Dated: April 4, 2012. Mark P. O’Malley, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore. 25109 comments received on the proposed rule and further evaluation of available options, VA intends to propose revised rules warranting a new notice of proposed rulemaking and publiccomment period. Thus, VA is withdrawing the proposed rule. [FR Doc. 2012–10252 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am] 2. Add a temporary section, § 100.35T05–0276 to read as follows: Approved: April 19, 2012. John R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs. BILLING CODE 9110–04–P [FR Doc. 2012–10259 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am] § 100.35T05–0276 Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Potomac River, National Harbor Access Channel, MD. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. BILLING CODE P (a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All waters of the Potomac River, within lines connecting the following positions: From 38°47′35″ N, longitude 077°02′22″ W, thence to latitude 38°47′12″ N, longitude 077°00′57″ W, and from latitude 38°47′24″ N, longitude 077°03′03″ W to latitude 38°46′54″ N, longitude 077°01′09″ W. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.\ (b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore. (2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign. (c) Special local regulations: (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons in the regulated area. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol vessel, a vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with the directions given. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to comply, or both. (2) Persons desiring to transit the regulated area must first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his designated representative. To seek permission to transit the area, the Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives can be contacted at telephone number 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF– FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). (3) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information broadcast on VHF– VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Apr 26, 2012 Jkt 226001 38 CFR Part 3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RIN 2900–AN46 40 CFR Part 52 Notice of Information and Evidence Necessary To Substantiate Claim [EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0274; FRL–9665–7] Department of Veterans Affairs. ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. AGENCY: In a document published in the Federal Register on December 11, 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to amend its regulations regarding VA’s duty to notify a claimant of the information and evidence necessary to substantiate a claim. This document withdraws that proposed rule. DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn as of April 27, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah W. Fusina, Legal Consultant, Regulations Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9700. (This is not a toll-free number.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 11, 2009, VA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (74 FR 65702), notifying the public of VA’s intent to amend its regulations regarding its duty to notify a claimant of information and evidence necessary to substantiate a claim. The purpose was to implement the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, which required the promulgation of regulations prescribing the requirements relating to the content of notice to be provided under 38 U.S.C. 5103(a). Public Law 110–389, 122 Stat. 4145, 4147. VA received several comments raising concerns with the proposed rule, including concerns relating to the establishment of effective dates, the clarity of what types of evidence are accepted, the specificity of the contents for notice, and the general clarity and consistency of the text of the proposed rule. Based on consideration of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions from certain boilers, process heaters and steam generators. We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Any comments must arrive by May 29, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2012–0274, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25106-25109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10252]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0276]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Potomac River, 
National Harbor Access Channel, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local 
regulations during the ``Swim Across the Potomac River'' swimming 
competition, to be held on the waters of the Potomac River on July 8, 
2012. These special local regulations are necessary to provide for the 
safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is 
intended to temporarily restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the 
Potomac River during the event.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before May 29, 2012. The Coast Guard anticipates that this 
proposed rule will be effective and enforced on July 8, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0276 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is 202-366-9329.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. 
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on 
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector 
Baltimore, MD; telephone 410-576-2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. 
If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, 
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 
202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted 
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

[[Page 25107]]

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at 
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but 
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it 
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully 
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, 
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when 
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you 
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a 
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact 
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' 
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this 
rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them 
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period and may change the rule 
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' 
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this 
rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room 
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West 
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We 
have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the 
Docket Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a 
request for one on or before the end of the comment period, using one 
of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you 
believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one 
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place 
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Basis and Purpose

    On July 8, 2012, the National Harbor Marina of Oxon Hill, Maryland, 
will sponsor a swimming competition across the Potomac River between 
Alexandria, Virginia and Oxon Hill, Maryland. The event consists of up 
to 250 swimmers on a 1.3-mile linear course located downriver from the 
Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-495/I-95) Bridge. The swimmers will be 
supported by sponsor-provided watercraft. The start will be located at 
North Point in Jones Point Park and the finish will be located along 
the shore at National Harbor Marina. Portions of the swim course will 
cross the Potomac River federal navigation channel and the National 
Harbor Access Channel. Due to the need for vessel control during the 
event, the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the 
event area to provide for the safety of participants, spectators and 
other transiting vessels.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local 
regulations on specified waters of the Potomac River. The regulations 
will be in effect from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. on July 8, 2012. The regulated 
area, approximately 1,900 yards in length and 350 yards in width, 
extends across the entire width of the Potomac River between the 
Virginia and Maryland shorelines and includes all waters of the Potomac 
River, within lines connecting the following positions: From latitude 
38[deg]47'35'' N, longitude 077[deg]02'22'' W, thence to latitude 
38[deg]47'12'' N, longitude 077[deg]00'57'' W, and from latitude 
38[deg]47'24'' N, longitude 077[deg]03'03'' W to latitude 
38[deg]46'54'' N, longitude 077[deg]01'09'' W. The effect of this 
proposed rule will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated 
area during the event. Vessels intending to transit the Potomac River 
through the regulated area, including the National Harbor Access 
Channel, will only be allowed to safely transit the regulated area when 
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander has deemed it safe to do so. These 
regulations are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to 
enhance the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. We expect the economic 
impact of this proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory 
Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is 
unnecessary. Although this regulation will prevent traffic from 
transiting portions of the Potomac River and National Harbor Access 
Channel during the event, the effect of this regulation will not be 
significant due to the limited duration that the regulated area will be 
in effect and the extensive advance notifications that will be made to 
the maritime community via the Local Notice to Mariners and marine 
information broadcasts, so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly. 
Additionally, the regulated area has been narrowly tailored to impose 
the least impact on general navigation yet provide the level of safety 
deemed necessary. Vessel traffic will be able to transit safely through 
a portion of the regulated area, but only after the last participant 
has cleared that portion of the regulated area and when the Coast Guard 
Patrol Commander deems it safe to do so.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises

[[Page 25108]]

small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently 
owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and 
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed 
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following 
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or 
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the effected 
portion of the Potomac River, including and National Harbor Access 
Channel, during the event.
    Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting portions 
of the Potomac River and the National Harbor Access Channel during the 
event, this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. 
This proposed rule would be in effect for only a limited period. Though 
the regulated area extends across the entire width of the river, vessel 
traffic may be permitted to safely transit a portion of the regulated 
area, but only after all participants have safely cleared that portion 
of the regulated area and when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems 
it safe for vessel traffic to do so. All Coast Guard vessels enforcing 
this regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM 
channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Before the enforcement period, we will issue 
maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better 
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the 
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance, please contact Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 
MD. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not 
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under 
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a 
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR Part 100 
applicable to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the 
United States that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users 
and shore side activities in the event area. The category of water 
activities includes but is not limited to sail boat regattas, boat 
parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew racing, canoe and 
sail board racing. We seek any comments or information that may lead to 
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed 
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.


[[Page 25109]]


    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

    1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

    2. Add a temporary section, Sec.  100.35T05-0276 to read as 
follows:


Sec.  100.35T05-0276  Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; 
Potomac River, National Harbor Access Channel, MD.

    (a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All 
waters of the Potomac River, within lines connecting the following 
positions: From 38[deg]47'35'' N, longitude 077[deg]02'22'' W, thence 
to latitude 38[deg]47'12'' N, longitude 077[deg]00'57'' W, and from 
latitude 38[deg]47'24'' N, longitude 077[deg]03'03'' W to latitude 
38[deg]46'54'' N, longitude 077[deg]01'09'' W. All coordinates 
reference Datum NAD 1983.\
    (b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a 
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has 
been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
    (2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by 
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant, 
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
    (c) Special local regulations: (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander 
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons in the 
regulated area. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol vessel, a 
vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with 
the directions given. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the 
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
    (2) Persons desiring to transit the regulated area must first 
obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his 
designated representative. To seek permission to transit the area, the 
Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives can be 
contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio, 
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this 
regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 
(156.8 MHz).
    (3) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard 
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information 
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date 
and times.
    (d) Enforcement period: This section will be enforced from 7 a.m. 
until 11 a.m. on July 8, 2012.

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012-10252 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.