Revision to Transmission Vegetation Management Reliability Standard; Notice Inviting Comments on Report, 25164 [2012-10218]
Download as PDF
25164
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Notices
(202) 502–8659. Although the
Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an
original and seven copies to: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20426.
More information about this project,
including a copy of the application, can
be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’
link of Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P–14363–000)
in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
Dated: April 23, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–10220 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM12–4–000]
Revision to Transmission Vegetation
Management Reliability Standard;
Notice Inviting Comments on Report
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Commission is posting and
inviting comment upon a report
prepared by the Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory (PNNL) on
‘‘Applicability of the ‘Gallet Equation’ to
the Vegetation Clearances of NERC
Reliability Standard FAC–003–2’’
(PNNL Report).
The Report was commissioned by the
Commission’s Office of Electric
Reliability, for the purpose of obtaining
an independent analysis of certain
technical questions raised by the
Minimum Vegetation Clearance
Distances as proposed in the North
American Electric Reliability
Corporation’s Reliability Standard FAC–
003–2 (Transmission Vegetation
Management). Specifically, PNNL was
commissioned to prepare a report
addressing the following:
The overall scope of this project shall
include analysis of the mathematics and
documentation of the technical justification
behind the application of the Gallet equation
and the assumptions used in the technical
reference paper [Exh. A of NERC’s filing]. To
put the analysis into perspective, are the
assumptions made in the development of the
Gallet Equation and their application in
NERC-approved Reliability Standard FAC–
003–2 reasonable to address the minimum
distance requirements needed to avoid
sustained vegetation-related outages? What
variations in Gallet distance may occur when
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Apr 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
comparing the original testing (use of
switching impulses and corona free
electrodes) against the variety of impulses a
line may be subject to and the concentrations
of coronal effects when using vegetation
instead of corona-free electrodes? Do the
equations adequately address the limiting
conditions (i.e., the expected extremes in
prevailing ambient conditions including
temperatures, humidity, conductor position,
amplification of any coronal effects and wind
speed) that are important to the insulation
performance of a line to prevent flashover to
nearby vegetation during real-time operating
conditions? The limiting conditions will be
identified, outlined, and applied in the
analysis.
This analysis shall also include a
discussion of the appropriateness of using
one clearance for all lines with the same
operating voltage as opposed to linking the
clearance to ‘‘as built’’ and design conditions.
Finally, the analysis shall identify if the
proposed clearance will provide the
minimum clearance needed to avoid a
flashover with regard to vegetation.
(Footnotes omitted.)
The PNNL Report will be posted on
the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov.
Comments on the PNNL Report
should be filed with the Commission
within 30 days of the issuance of this
Notice. The Commission encourages
electronic submission of comments in
lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at
https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to
file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the comment
to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
All filings in this docket are
accessible on-line at https://
www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link
and will be available for review in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room in
Washington, DC. There is an
‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site
that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added
to a subscribed docket. For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please
email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or
call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY,
call (202) 502–8659.
Questions regarding this Notice
should be directed to: David O’Connor,
Office of Electric Reliability, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
202–502–6695, David.OConnor@ferc.
gov.
Dated: April 23, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–10218 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R10–OAR–2010–1914; FRL–9664–7]
Adequacy Status of the Eagle River,
Alaska Particulate Matter Limited
Maintenance Plan for Transportation
Conformity Purposes
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy
determination.
AGENCY:
In this action, EPA is
notifying the public of its finding that
the Eagle River, Alaska, Particulate
Matter (PM10) Limited Maintenance
Plan, submitted by the State of Alaska
on September 20, 2011, is adequate for
conformity purposes. EPA made this
finding pursuant to the adequacy
process established at 40 CFR
93.118(f)(1). As a result of our adequacy
finding, conformity requirements will
be reduced.
DATES: This finding is effective May 14,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
finding will be available at EPA’s
conformity Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/adequacy.htm. You may also
contact Wayne Elson, U.S. EPA, Region
10 (OAWT–107), 1200 Sixth Ave, Suite
900, Seattle WA 98101; (206) 553–1463
or elson.wayne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action provides notice of EPA’s
adequacy finding regarding the PM10
Limited Maintenance Plan for Eagle
River, Alaska. EPA’s finding was made
pursuant to the adequacy review
process for implementation plan
submissions delineated at 40 CFR
93.118(f)(1) under which EPA reviews
the adequacy of an state implementation
plan (SIP) submission prior to EPA’s
final action on the implementation plan.
On September 20, 2011, Alaska
Department of Environmental
Conservation submitted a PM10
maintenance plan revision to EPA.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 93.118 (f)(1), EPA
notified the public of its receipt of this
plan that would be reviewed for an
adequacy determination on EPA’s Web
site and requested public comment by
no later than February 27, 2012. EPA
received no comments on the plan
during that comment period. As part of
our review, we also reviewed comments
submitted to the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation on the
Limited Maintenance Plan during the
public hearing process. There were no
adverse comments submitted during the
State hearing process regarding the new
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10218]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RM12-4-000]
Revision to Transmission Vegetation Management Reliability
Standard; Notice Inviting Comments on Report
The Commission is posting and inviting comment upon a report
prepared by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) on
``Applicability of the `Gallet Equation' to the Vegetation Clearances
of NERC Reliability Standard FAC-003-2'' (PNNL Report).
The Report was commissioned by the Commission's Office of Electric
Reliability, for the purpose of obtaining an independent analysis of
certain technical questions raised by the Minimum Vegetation Clearance
Distances as proposed in the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation's Reliability Standard FAC-003-2 (Transmission Vegetation
Management). Specifically, PNNL was commissioned to prepare a report
addressing the following:
The overall scope of this project shall include analysis of the
mathematics and documentation of the technical justification behind
the application of the Gallet equation and the assumptions used in
the technical reference paper [Exh. A of NERC's filing]. To put the
analysis into perspective, are the assumptions made in the
development of the Gallet Equation and their application in NERC-
approved Reliability Standard FAC-003-2 reasonable to address the
minimum distance requirements needed to avoid sustained vegetation-
related outages? What variations in Gallet distance may occur when
comparing the original testing (use of switching impulses and corona
free electrodes) against the variety of impulses a line may be
subject to and the concentrations of coronal effects when using
vegetation instead of corona-free electrodes? Do the equations
adequately address the limiting conditions (i.e., the expected
extremes in prevailing ambient conditions including temperatures,
humidity, conductor position, amplification of any coronal effects
and wind speed) that are important to the insulation performance of
a line to prevent flashover to nearby vegetation during real-time
operating conditions? The limiting conditions will be identified,
outlined, and applied in the analysis.
This analysis shall also include a discussion of the
appropriateness of using one clearance for all lines with the same
operating voltage as opposed to linking the clearance to ``as
built'' and design conditions. Finally, the analysis shall identify
if the proposed clearance will provide the minimum clearance needed
to avoid a flashover with regard to vegetation. (Footnotes omitted.)
The PNNL Report will be posted on the Commission's Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov.
Comments on the PNNL Report should be filed with the Commission
within 30 days of the issuance of this Notice. The Commission
encourages electronic submission of comments in lieu of paper using the
``eFiling'' link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the comment
to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
All filings in this docket are accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ``eLibrary'' link and will be available for
review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables
subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a
subscribed docket. For assistance with any FERC Online service, please
email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free).
For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Questions regarding this Notice should be directed to: David
O'Connor, Office of Electric Reliability, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, 202-502-6695,
David.OConnor@ferc.gov.
Dated: April 23, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-10218 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P