Reporting of Ancillary Airline Passenger Revenues, 25105-25106 [2012-10179]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
issues raised by the remaining NRDC
PRMs through the process the
Commission established for addressing
the remaining recommendations in the
NTTF Report. This PRM docket is
closed.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day
of April 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–10193 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Parts 234 and 241
RIN 2139–AA13
[Docket No. DOT–RITA–2011–0001]
Reporting of Ancillary Airline
Passenger Revenues
Office of the Secretary (OST),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.
AGENCY:
This document announces a
public meeting on a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) issued on July 15,
2011. The NPRM proposed changes
regarding reporting of airline ancillary
passenger revenues, computation of
mishandled baggage rates, and
collection of separate statistics for
mishandled wheelchairs and scooters
used by passengers with disabilities.
During the public meeting, DOT staff
will provide a summary of the proposals
in the NPRM and seek input on costs
and benefits associated with the
implementation of the proposals.
DATES: Meeting Date and Time: The
public meeting is scheduled for May 17,
2012, from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and
from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m., Eastern Time.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
the Oklahoma City Conference Room
(located on the lobby level of the West
Building) at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
Attendance is open to the public;
however, since access to the U.S. DOT
headquarters building is controlled for
security purposes, any member of the
general public who plans to attend this
meeting must notify the Department
contacts noted below at least ten (10)
calendar days prior to the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles E. Smith, Trial Attorney, Office
of the Assistant General Counsel for
Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC
20590, 202–366–9342 (phone), 202–
366–7152 (fax), Charles.Smith@dot.gov.
You may also contact Blane A. Workie,
Deputy Assistant General Counsel,
Office of the Assistant General Counsel
for Aviation Enforcement and
Proceedings, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202–366–
9342 (phone), 202–366–7152 (fax),
Blane.Workie@dot.gov. TTY users may
reach these individuals via the Federal
Relay Service toll-free at 800–877–8339.
You may obtain copies of this notice in
an accessible format by contacting the
above named individuals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
15, 2011, the Department of
Transportation (DOT or Department)
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register
proposing to collect airline ancillary
revenue information in a more detailed
manner, change the way mishandled
baggage rates are computed from
mishandled baggage reports per unit of
domestic enplanements to mishandled
bags per unit of checked bags, and fill
a data gap by collecting separate
statistics on mishandled wheelchairs
and scooters used by passengers with
disabilities. See 76 FR 41726. You may
review comments to this NPRM at
www.regulations.gov, docket no. DOT–
RITA–2011–0001. The Department is
holding the public meeting primarily for
the purpose of obtaining additional
information about current industry
practices for processing and accounting
for baggage and wheelchairs. This
information is critical to determining
the cost associated with the proposal to
change the manner in which the
mishandled baggage rate is calculated
and the proposal to report on the
number of mishandled wheelchairs/
scooters. We are also interested in
learning more about the costs associated
with the proposal to report airline
ancillary fee revenue. Interested persons
may provide oral comments at the
meeting. The Department will also
accept written materials at the public
meeting. We will place, in the public
docket for this rulemaking, any
materials received at the meeting, as
well as a summary of the meeting.
Below are examples of questions that
the Department intends to pose at the
public meeting.
1. Reporting of Ancillary Fee Revenue
• What is the current industry
practice regarding ancillary fee revenue
reporting for the Form 41 financial data?
The Department would like to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25105
understand the process and logistics of
how ancillary revenues are collected
and transferred into reporting formats. It
would also be helpful to know the
amount of staff time required to develop
the quarterly and semi-annual Form 41
reports.
• How would the aforementioned
systems and processes be adapted for
carriers to comply with the proposed
reporting requirement?
• What new systems and processes
would be necessary for carriers to
comply with the proposed reporting
requirement?
• What other resource requirements,
e.g. additional personnel and training,
would be necessary for carriers to
comply with the proposed reporting
requirement? What would be the dollar
cost of providing those resources?
• The Department assumes that, as a
matter of good business practice,
airlines already collect the ancillary fee
revenue identified in the proposed
reporting requirement. Under this
assumption, the costs of compliance
with the new reporting requirement are
estimated to be the necessary one-time
programming costs to adapt existing
computer systems (about 40 hours of
programming for each carrier to capture
the ancillary revenue items), in addition
to any recurring annual expenses (e.g.
staff time) for developing the additional
reports. Are there airlines that don’t
already gather information about the
ancillary fee revenue identified in the
NPRM?
• How much lead time is necessary to
implement the proposed reporting
requirement?
• Is there any other information that
the Department should consider
regarding the reporting of ancillary fee
revenue?
2. The Metric Used To Calculate
Mishandled Baggage
• What is the current industry
practice regarding processing and
accounting for checked bags that are
checked at the check-in counter, at the
self-service bag drop, at the gate, or at
the jet bridge? The Department would
like to understand the entire process
from what happens on the ground and
the associated data systems when
passengers check a bag, to what happens
on the ground and the associated data
systems when passengers claim the bag
upon arrival, whether that is at the
baggage carousel or at the gate or jet
bridge.
• What are the existing processes and
data systems associated with reporting
mishandled bags? The Department
would like to understand the reporting
process from the time the passenger
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
25106
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
makes a report to the time the airline
provides its mishandled baggage data to
DOT.
• How could the aforementioned
systems and processes be adapted to
accommodate the proposed reporting
requirement?
• What new systems and processes
would be necessary for carriers to
comply with the proposed reporting
requirement?
• What other resource requirements,
e.g. additional personnel and training,
would be necessary for carriers to
comply with the proposed reporting
requirement?
• What would be the dollar cost of
adjustments to existing systems and
processes, new systems and processes,
and other resource requirements?
• The Department assumes that, as a
matter of good business practice,
airlines already gather and maintain
information on the total number of
counter-checked bags, gate-checked
bags, and valet bags transported in the
aircraft compartment. Under this
assumption, the costs of compliance
would include the adaption of the
current reporting systems and processes
(or, if they do not exist, the
development and implementation of
new systems and processes) that gather
existing data for the new reporting
requirements, in addition to any
recurring annual expenses (e.g. staff
time) for developing such reports. We
are interested in learning if our
assumption about current industry
practice is inaccurate.
• How much lead time is necessary to
implement the proposed reporting
requirement?
• Is there any other information that
the Department should consider
regarding the metric used to calculate
mishandled baggage rates?
3. The Reporting of Mishandled
Wheelchairs and Scooters
• What is the current industry
practice regarding processing and
accounting for wheelchairs and scooters
that are checked at the check-in counter,
at the self-service bag drop, at the gate,
or at the aircraft door? Are they
accounted for separately from other
baggage? The Department would like to
understand the entire process from what
happens on the ground and the
associated data systems when
passengers check their wheelchairs or
scooters, to what happens on the ground
and the associated data systems when
passengers claim the assistive device
upon arrival whether that is at the
baggage carousel, the gate or jet bridge.
• What are the existing processes and
data systems associated with reporting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
mishandled wheelchairs and scooters
transported in the cargo hold?
• How could the aforementioned
systems and processes be adapted to
accommodate the proposed reporting
requirement?
• What new systems and processes
would be necessary for carriers to
comply with the proposed reporting
requirement?
• What other resource requirements,
e.g. additional personnel and training,
would be necessary for carriers to
comply with the proposed reporting
requirement?
• What would be the dollar cost of
adjustments to existing systems and
processes, new systems and processes,
and other resource requirements?
• The Department assumes that, as a
matter of good business practice,
airlines already gather and maintain
information on damage, delay, and loss
of wheelchairs and scooters transported
in the aircraft cargo compartment.
Under this assumption, the costs of
compliance would include the adaption
of the current reporting systems and
processes (or, if they do not exist, the
development and implementation of
new systems and processes) that gather
existing data for the new reporting
requirements, in addition to any
recurring annual expenses (e.g. staff
time) for developing such reports. We
are interested in learning if our
assumption about current industry
practice is inaccurate.
• How much lead time is necessary to
implement the proposed reporting
requirement?
• Is there any other information that
the Department should consider
regarding the reporting of mishandled
wheelchairs and scooters?
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 23,
2012.
Pat Hu,
Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations
during the ‘‘Swim Across the Potomac
River’’ swimming competition, to be
held on the waters of the Potomac River
on July 8, 2012. These special local
regulations are necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event. This action is
intended to temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Potomac River
during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 29, 2012. The Coast
Guard anticipates that this proposed
rule will be effective and enforced on
July 8, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0276 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
Coast Guard
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD;
telephone 410–576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
33 CFR Part 100
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
[FR Doc. 2012–10179 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–HY–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0276]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Potomac River, National
Harbor Access Channel, MD
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Coast Guard, DHS.
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25105-25106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10179]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Parts 234 and 241
RIN 2139-AA13
[Docket No. DOT-RITA-2011-0001]
Reporting of Ancillary Airline Passenger Revenues
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces a public meeting on a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued on July 15, 2011. The NPRM proposed
changes regarding reporting of airline ancillary passenger revenues,
computation of mishandled baggage rates, and collection of separate
statistics for mishandled wheelchairs and scooters used by passengers
with disabilities. During the public meeting, DOT staff will provide a
summary of the proposals in the NPRM and seek input on costs and
benefits associated with the implementation of the proposals.
DATES: Meeting Date and Time: The public meeting is scheduled for May
17, 2012, from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.,
Eastern Time.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Oklahoma City Conference
Room (located on the lobby level of the West Building) at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC. Attendance is open to the public; however, since access to the U.S.
DOT headquarters building is controlled for security purposes, any
member of the general public who plans to attend this meeting must
notify the Department contacts noted below at least ten (10) calendar
days prior to the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles E. Smith, Trial Attorney,
Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and
Proceedings, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202-366-9342 (phone), 202-366-7152 (fax),
Charles.Smith@dot.gov. You may also contact Blane A. Workie, Deputy
Assistant General Counsel, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for
Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202-
366-9342 (phone), 202-366-7152 (fax), Blane.Workie@dot.gov. TTY users
may reach these individuals via the Federal Relay Service toll-free at
800-877-8339. You may obtain copies of this notice in an accessible
format by contacting the above named individuals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 15, 2011, the Department of
Transportation (DOT or Department) published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register proposing to collect airline
ancillary revenue information in a more detailed manner, change the way
mishandled baggage rates are computed from mishandled baggage reports
per unit of domestic enplanements to mishandled bags per unit of
checked bags, and fill a data gap by collecting separate statistics on
mishandled wheelchairs and scooters used by passengers with
disabilities. See 76 FR 41726. You may review comments to this NPRM at
www.regulations.gov, docket no. DOT-RITA-2011-0001. The Department is
holding the public meeting primarily for the purpose of obtaining
additional information about current industry practices for processing
and accounting for baggage and wheelchairs. This information is
critical to determining the cost associated with the proposal to change
the manner in which the mishandled baggage rate is calculated and the
proposal to report on the number of mishandled wheelchairs/scooters. We
are also interested in learning more about the costs associated with
the proposal to report airline ancillary fee revenue. Interested
persons may provide oral comments at the meeting. The Department will
also accept written materials at the public meeting. We will place, in
the public docket for this rulemaking, any materials received at the
meeting, as well as a summary of the meeting.
Below are examples of questions that the Department intends to pose
at the public meeting.
1. Reporting of Ancillary Fee Revenue
What is the current industry practice regarding ancillary
fee revenue reporting for the Form 41 financial data? The Department
would like to understand the process and logistics of how ancillary
revenues are collected and transferred into reporting formats. It would
also be helpful to know the amount of staff time required to develop
the quarterly and semi-annual Form 41 reports.
How would the aforementioned systems and processes be
adapted for carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement?
What new systems and processes would be necessary for
carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement?
What other resource requirements, e.g. additional
personnel and training, would be necessary for carriers to comply with
the proposed reporting requirement? What would be the dollar cost of
providing those resources?
The Department assumes that, as a matter of good business
practice, airlines already collect the ancillary fee revenue identified
in the proposed reporting requirement. Under this assumption, the costs
of compliance with the new reporting requirement are estimated to be
the necessary one-time programming costs to adapt existing computer
systems (about 40 hours of programming for each carrier to capture the
ancillary revenue items), in addition to any recurring annual expenses
(e.g. staff time) for developing the additional reports. Are there
airlines that don't already gather information about the ancillary fee
revenue identified in the NPRM?
How much lead time is necessary to implement the proposed
reporting requirement?
Is there any other information that the Department should
consider regarding the reporting of ancillary fee revenue?
2. The Metric Used To Calculate Mishandled Baggage
What is the current industry practice regarding processing
and accounting for checked bags that are checked at the check-in
counter, at the self-service bag drop, at the gate, or at the jet
bridge? The Department would like to understand the entire process from
what happens on the ground and the associated data systems when
passengers check a bag, to what happens on the ground and the
associated data systems when passengers claim the bag upon arrival,
whether that is at the baggage carousel or at the gate or jet bridge.
What are the existing processes and data systems
associated with reporting mishandled bags? The Department would like to
understand the reporting process from the time the passenger
[[Page 25106]]
makes a report to the time the airline provides its mishandled baggage
data to DOT.
How could the aforementioned systems and processes be
adapted to accommodate the proposed reporting requirement?
What new systems and processes would be necessary for
carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement?
What other resource requirements, e.g. additional
personnel and training, would be necessary for carriers to comply with
the proposed reporting requirement?
What would be the dollar cost of adjustments to existing
systems and processes, new systems and processes, and other resource
requirements?
The Department assumes that, as a matter of good business
practice, airlines already gather and maintain information on the total
number of counter-checked bags, gate-checked bags, and valet bags
transported in the aircraft compartment. Under this assumption, the
costs of compliance would include the adaption of the current reporting
systems and processes (or, if they do not exist, the development and
implementation of new systems and processes) that gather existing data
for the new reporting requirements, in addition to any recurring annual
expenses (e.g. staff time) for developing such reports. We are
interested in learning if our assumption about current industry
practice is inaccurate.
How much lead time is necessary to implement the proposed
reporting requirement?
Is there any other information that the Department should
consider regarding the metric used to calculate mishandled baggage
rates?
3. The Reporting of Mishandled Wheelchairs and Scooters
What is the current industry practice regarding processing
and accounting for wheelchairs and scooters that are checked at the
check-in counter, at the self-service bag drop, at the gate, or at the
aircraft door? Are they accounted for separately from other baggage?
The Department would like to understand the entire process from what
happens on the ground and the associated data systems when passengers
check their wheelchairs or scooters, to what happens on the ground and
the associated data systems when passengers claim the assistive device
upon arrival whether that is at the baggage carousel, the gate or jet
bridge.
What are the existing processes and data systems
associated with reporting mishandled wheelchairs and scooters
transported in the cargo hold?
How could the aforementioned systems and processes be
adapted to accommodate the proposed reporting requirement?
What new systems and processes would be necessary for
carriers to comply with the proposed reporting requirement?
What other resource requirements, e.g. additional
personnel and training, would be necessary for carriers to comply with
the proposed reporting requirement?
What would be the dollar cost of adjustments to existing
systems and processes, new systems and processes, and other resource
requirements?
The Department assumes that, as a matter of good business
practice, airlines already gather and maintain information on damage,
delay, and loss of wheelchairs and scooters transported in the aircraft
cargo compartment. Under this assumption, the costs of compliance would
include the adaption of the current reporting systems and processes
(or, if they do not exist, the development and implementation of new
systems and processes) that gather existing data for the new reporting
requirements, in addition to any recurring annual expenses (e.g. staff
time) for developing such reports. We are interested in learning if our
assumption about current industry practice is inaccurate.
How much lead time is necessary to implement the proposed
reporting requirement?
Is there any other information that the Department should
consider regarding the reporting of mishandled wheelchairs and
scooters?
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 23, 2012.
Pat Hu,
Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2012-10179 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P