Submission of Information Collection Under the Paperwork Reduction Act; Reinstatement, 24730-24734 [2012-9922]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24730
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
be admitted to the building. Please
provide your name, telephone number
and organization by close of business on
June 1, 2012, to the contact person listed
in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
below. Additionally, all visitors to Coast
Guard Headquarters must produce valid
photo identification for access to the
facility.
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
meeting, contact the person listed in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: below as
soon as possible.
To facilitate public participation, we
are inviting public comment on the
issues to be considered by the
committee as listed in the ‘‘Agenda’’
section below. Comments must be
submitted in writing no later than June
1, 2012, and must be identified by
[USCG–2012–0359] and may be
submitted by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the words ‘‘Department of
Homeland Security’’ and the docket
number for this action. Comments
received will be posted without
alteration at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. You may review a Privacy Act
notice regarding our public dockets in
the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Docket: For access to the docket to
read documents or comments related to
this notice, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and use ‘‘USCG–
2012–0359’’ as your search term.
A public comment period of up to one
hour will be held during the meeting on
June 7th, 2012, after the committee
completes its work on the agenda given
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Speakers are requested to limit their
comments to 5 minutes. Please note that
the public comment period may end
before the hour allotted, following the
last call for comments. Contact the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
individual listed below to register as a
speaker.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Dean, GLPAC Assistant
Designated Federal Officer (ADFO),
Commandant (CG–5522), U.S. Coast
Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street
SW Stop 7580, Washington, DC 20593–
7580; telephone 202–372–1533, fax
202–372–1909, or email at
David.J.Dean@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
this meeting is given under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
(Pub. L. 92–463). GLPAC was
established under the authority of
46 U.S.C. 9307, and makes
recommendations to the Secretary of
Homeland Security and the Coast Guard
on matters relating to Great Lakes
pilotage, including review of proposed
Great Lakes pilotage regulations and
policies.
GLPAC expects to meet twice per year
but may also meet at other times at the
call of the Secretary. Further
information about GLPAC is available
by searching on ‘‘Great Lakes Pilotage
Advisory Committee’’ at https://
www.faca.gov.
Agenda
The GLPAC will meet to review,
discuss and formulate recommendations
on the following issues:
Relocating the Great Lakes Pilotage
Division physical office from
Washington, DC to Cleveland, OH.
Comprehensive study of Great Lakes
pilotage operations including detailed
analysis of the existing bridge hour
standard for pilotage operations, the
seasonal pilotage work hour standard of
1000/1800 hours for designated/
undesignated waters, the efficacy of the
current billing scheme and alternatives,
the standard for return on investment
for pilotage operations, the use of a
multi-year average of vessel traffic levels
for annual projections of traffic, and a
review of appropriate pilot
compensation.
Audits for the 2014 Appendix A
rulemaking which establishes the rates
that pilots can charge industry for their
services.
Memorandum of Arrangements
between the U.S. and Canada
concerning definitions and procedures
for pilotage in the shared waters of the
Great Lakes.
Establishing a permanent split of St.
Lawrence River pilotage assignments
through a change point at Iroquois Lock.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This will be followed by a public
comment period of up to one hour.
Speakers are requested to limit their
comments to 5 minutes.
More detailed information and
materials relating to these issues appear
in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. Use ‘‘USCG–
2012–0359’’ as your search term.
Dated: April 18, 2012.
D. A. Goward,
Director Marine Transportation Systems, U.S.
Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2012–9889 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
Submission of Information Collection
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act;
Reinstatement
National Indian Gaming
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The National Indian Gaming
Commission (‘‘NIGC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’), in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, is seeking
reinstatement of approval from the
Office of Management and Budget for
collection of information for the
following information collection
activities: (1) Compliance and
enforcement under the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (IGRA) ; (2) approval of
Class II background Investigation tribal
licenses; (3) management contract
regulations; (4) National Environmental
Policy Act procedures; (5) annual fees
payable by Indian gaming operations;
(6) issuance of certificates of self
regulation to tribes for Class II gaming;
(7) minimum internal control standards;
and (8) facility license review. These
information collections have expired.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments can be mailed
directly to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Desk
Officer for the National Indian Gaming
Commission, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including copies of
the proposed collection of information
and supporting documentation, contact
Michael Hoenig, at (202) 632–7003; fax
(202) 632–7066 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Request for Comments
You are invited to comment on the
following items to the Desk Office at
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
OMB at the citation in the ADDRESSES
section.
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden (including the
hours and cost) of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumption used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
collection techniques or forms of
information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
become a matter of public record. We
will not request nor sponsor a collection
of information, and you need not
respond to such a request, if there is no
valid Office of Management and Budget
Control Number.
II. Data
Title: Compliance and Enforcement.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0001.
Background: IGRA governs the
regulation of gaming on Indian lands.
Although IGRA places primary
responsibility with the tribes for
regulating their gaming activity,
§ 2706(b) directs the NIGC to monitor
Class II gaming conducted on Indian
lands on a continuing basis. IGRA
authorizes the NIGC to access and
inspect all papers, books and records
relating to gross revenues of Class II
gaming conducted on Indian lands and
any other matters necessary to carry out
the duties of the Commission. IGRA also
requires tribes to provide NIGC with
annual independent audits of gaming,
including contracts in excess of
$25,000.00. 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(2)(c), (d);
25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(1)(A)(ii). In
accordance with these statutory
responsibilities, NIGC regulations, 25
CFR 571.7, requires Indian gaming
operations to keep permanent financial
records. NIGC regulations, 25 CFR
571.12 and 571.13, require tribes to
annually submit an independent audit
of their gaming operations to NIGC. The
NIGC uses this information to fulfill its
statutory responsibilities under IGRA.
Additionally, IGRA, 25 U.S.C. 2713,
authorizes the NIGC Chair to issue
notices of violation, civil fine
assessments, and closure orders for
violations of the Act or the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Commission’s regulations. This
authority is implemented through 25
CFR part 575. The full Commission
reviews these matters on appeal under
25 CFR part 577.
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is mandatory and allows the
NIGC to conduct its statutory duty to
regulate Indian gaming. No additional
burden is imposed by the requirements
to maintain customary business records
and to allow NIGC personnel access to
those records.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming
operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
422.
Estimated Annual Responses: 1,395.
Estimated Time per Response: The
range of time can vary from no
additional burden hours to 50 burden
hours for one item.
Frequency of Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 6,752.
Title: Approval of Class II and Class
III Ordinances, Background
Investigations and Gaming Licenses.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0003.
Background: The Act sets standards
for the regulation of gaming, including
requirements for approval or
disapproval of tribal gaming ordinances.
IGRA, § 2705(a)(3), requires the NIGC
Chair to review all class II and class III
tribal gaming ordinances.
In accordance with this provision,
NIGC regulations, 25 CFR 522.2, require
tribes to submit to the NIGC: (1) A copy
of the gaming ordinance to be approved,
including a copy of the authorizing
resolution by which it was enacted by
the tribal government and a request for
approval of the ordinance or resolution;
(2) a description of procedures the tribe
will employ in conducting background
investigations on key employees or
primary management officials; (3) a
description of procedures the tribe will
use to issue licenses to primary
management officials and key
employees; (4) copies of all gaming
regulations; (5) a copy of any applicable
tribal-state compact; (6) a description of
dispute resolution procedures for
disputes arising between the gaming
public and the tribe or management
contractor; (7) identification of the law
enforcement agency that will take
fingerprints and a description of the
procedures for conducting criminal
history checks; and (8) designation of an
agent for service of process.
Under NIGC regulations, 25 CFR
522.3, tribes must submit any
amendment to the ordinance or
resolution for approval by the NIGC
Chair. In this instance, the tribe must
provide a copy of the authorizing
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24731
resolution. The NIGC will use the
information collected to approve or
disapprove the ordinance or
amendment.
Section 2710 of the Act requires tribes
to conduct background investigations on
key employees and primary
management officials involved in class
II and class III gaming. NIGC
regulations, 25 CFR 522.4(b)(4), require
a tribe’s ordinance to provide that the
tribe will perform background
investigations and issue licenses for key
employees and primary management
officials according to requirements that
are at least as stringent as those in NIGC
regulations, 25 CFR parts 556 and 558.
25 CFR parts 556 and 558 require tribes
to perform each investigation using
information such as name, address,
previous employment records, previous
relationships with either Indian tribes or
the gaming industry, licensing relating
to those relationships, any convictions,
and any other information a tribe feels
is relevant to the employment of the
individuals being investigated. 25 CFR
556.4. Tribes are then required to
submit to the NIGC a copy of the
completed employment applications
and investigative reports and licensing
eligibility determinations on key
employees or primary management
officials before issuing gaming licenses
to those persons. 25 CFR 556.5. The
NIGC uses this information to review
the eligibility and suitability
determinations tribes make and advises
them if it disagrees with any particular
determination.
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is mandatory and allows the
NIGC to carry out its statutory duties
and gives the respondents standards for
compliance.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming
operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
282.
Estimated Annual Responses:
112,677.
Estimated Time per Response: The
range of time can vary from .5 burden
hours to 80 burden hours for one item.
Frequency of Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours on Respondents: 36,973 hours.
Title: Management Contract
Regulations.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0004.
Background: Subject to the approval
of the NIGC Chair, an Indian tribe may
enter into a gaming management
contract for the operation and
management of tribal gaming activity.
25 U.S.C. 2710(e) and 2711. In
approving a management contract, the
Chair shall require and obtain the
following: Name, address, and other
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24732
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
pertinent background information on
each person or entity having a financial
interest in, or management
responsibility for such contract, and in
the case of a corporation those
individuals who serve on the board of
directors of such corporation and
certain stockholders; a description of
previous experience that each person
has had with other Indian gaming
contracts or with the gaming industry
including any gaming licenses which
the person holds; and a complete
financial statement of each person
listed. 25 CFR 533.3; 25 CFR 537.1(b).
Under NIGC regulations, 25 CFR part
533, the Chair requires the submission
of the contract to contain the following:
original signatures; any collateral
agreements to the contract; a tribal
ordinance or resolution authorizing the
submission and supporting
documentation; a three-year business
plan which sets forth the parties’ goals,
objectives, budgets, financial plans,
related matters, income statements,
sources and use of funds statements for
the previous three years; and, for any
contract exceeding five years or which
includes a management fee of more than
30 percent, justification that the capital
investment required and income
projections for the gaming operation
require the longer duration or the
additional fee.
Under NIGC regulations, 25 CFR part
535, the Chair may approve a
modification to a management contract
or an assignment of that management
contract based on information similar to
that required under part 533. Part 535
also specifies that the Chair may void a
previous management contract approval
and allows the parties the opportunity
to submit information relevant to that
determination.
25 CFR part 537 specifies the
requirements for submission of
background information in
amplification of the statutory
requirement for obtaining information
on persons and entities having a direct
financial interest in or management
responsibility for a management
contract. Finally, 25 CFR part 539
permits appeals to the Commission from
a decision of the Chair to disapprove a
management contract and allows the
Indian tribe and the management
company an opportunity to provide
information relevant to that appeal. The
NIGC will use the information collected
to either approve or disapprove the
contract or, in the case of an appeal, to
grant or deny the appeal.
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is mandatory, and the benefit
to the respondents is the approval of
Indian gaming management contracts.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Respondents: Tribal governing bodies
and management contractors.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
183 (submission of contracts, contract
amendments, and background
investigation submissions).
Estimated Time per Response: The
range of time can vary from no added
burden hours to 50 burden hours for one
item.
Frequency of Response: Usually no
more than once a year.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly
Burden to Respondents: Up to 3,890.
Title: NEPA Procedures.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0006.
Background: NEPA requires federal
agencies to analyze proposed major
federal actions that significantly affect
the quality of the human environment.
The NIGC has identified one type of
action it undertakes that requires review
under NEPA—approving third-party
management contracts for the operation
of gaming activity under IGRA, 25
U.S.C. 2711. Depending on the nature of
the subject contract and other
circumstances, approval of such
management contracts may be
categorically excluded from NEPA, it
may require the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment (‘‘EA’’), or it
may require the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement
(‘‘EIS’’). In any case, the proponents of
a management contract will be expected
to submit information to the NIGC and
assist in the development of the
required NEPA documentation.
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is mandatory under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq., and
White House Council on Environmental
Quality regulations, 40 CFR 1500–1508.
Respondents: Tribal governing bodies,
management companies, and
environmental consultants.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 6
per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
range of time can vary from 1,300 to
4,500 hours per response. This variation
depends on whether the response is an
EA or EIS.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 12,300 (6 EAs × 1,300
hours) + 1 EIS at 4,500 hours for EIS.
Title: Annual Fees Payable by Indian
Gaming Operations.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0007.
Background: IGRA requires the NIGC
to set an annual funding rate. The
annual funding rate is the primary
mechanism for NIGC funding under
25 U.S.C. 2717, and NIGC regulations,
25 CFR part 514 implements the
requirement. Fees are computed on the
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
basis of the assessable gross revenues of
each gaming operation using rates set by
the NIGC. The total of all fees assessed
annually cannot exceed 0.08 percent of
gross gaming revenue. Under its
implementing regulation for the fee
payment program, 25 C.F.R. part 514,
the NIGC relies on a quarterly statement
of gross gaming revenues provided by
each gaming operation that is subject to
the fee requirement. When the Office of
Management and Budget last approved
the collection of information for annual
fees, the NIGC required quarterly
submissions of fees and worksheets.
Although the Commission later changed
part 514 to require biannual
submissions of fees and fee worksheets,
the Agency has published a final rule in
the Federal Register restoring the
submission requirements to quarterly.
That rule goes into effect on October 1,
2012, and the implementation date for
quarterly submissions is January 1,
2013. The final rule can be found at 77
FR 5178 and on the NIGC’s web site.
The required information is needed for
the NIGC to both set and adjust fee rates
and to support the computation of fees
paid by each gaming operation.
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is mandatory and allows the
NIGC to both set and adjust fee rates and
to support the computation of fees paid
by each gaming operation.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming
operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
446.
Estimated Annual Responses: 892.
Estimated Time per Response: 2
hours.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours per
Respondent: 4.
Frequency of Response: Twice per
year.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1,784 hours.
Title: Issuance of Certificates of Self
Regulation to Tribe for Class II Gaming,
25 CFR part 518.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0008.
Background: IGRA allows any Indian
tribe that has conducted class II gaming
for at least three years to petition the
NIGC for a certificate of self-regulation
for its class II gaming operations. The
NIGC will issue the certificate if it
determines from available information
that the tribe has conducted its gaming
activity in a manner which has resulted
in an effective and honest accounting of
all revenues, a reputation for safe, fair,
and honest operation of the gaming
activity, and an enterprise free of
evidence of criminal or dishonest
activity. The tribe must also have
adopted and implement proper
accounting, licensing, and enforcement
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
systems and conducted the gaming
operation on a fiscally or economically
sound basis. The implementing
regulation at 25 CFR part 518 requires
a tribe interested in receiving the
certificate to file a petition with the
NIGC describing, generally, the tribe’s
gaming operations, its regulatory
process, its uses of net gaming revenue,
and its accounting and recordkeeping
systems for the gaming operation. The
tribe must also provide copies of various
documents in support of the petition.
Submission of the petition and
supporting documentation is voluntary.
The NIGC will use the information
submitted by the respondent tribe in
determining whether to issue the
certificate of self-regulation.
Those tribes who have been issued a
certificate of self-regulation are required
to submit annually a report to the NIGC.
Such report shall set forth information
to establish that the tribe has
continuously met the eligibility
requirements of 25 CFR 518.2 and the
approval requirements of 25 CFR 518.4
and shall include a report with
supporting documentation which
explains how tribal gaming revenues
were used in accordance with the
requirements of IGRA, 25 U.S.C.
2710(b)(2)(B).
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is voluntary for those tribes
petitioning for a certificate of selfregulation and mandatory for those
tribes who hold a certificate of selfregulation according to statutory
regulations, and the benefit to the
respondents is a reduction of the
amount of fees assessed on class II
gaming revenue by the NIGC.
Respondents: Tribal governments;
tribes who hold certificates of selfregulation; petition submission is
voluntary; annual report submission is
mandatory.
Estimated Number of Voluntary
Respondents: 0.
Estimated Time per Voluntary
Response: 0.
Frequency of Response: At will.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly
Burden to Voluntary Respondents: 0.
Number of Mandatory Respondents:
2.
Estimated Time per Mandatory
Response: 50.
Frequency of Mandatory Response:
Annual.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly
Burden to Mandatory Respondents: 100.
Title: Minimum Internal Control
Standards.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0009.
Background: IGRA governs the
regulation of gaming on Indian lands.
Although the IGRA places primary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
responsibility with the tribes for
regulating Class II gaming, Section
2706(b) of IGRA directs the NIGC to
monitor Class II gaming conducted on
Indian lands on a continuing basis.
IGRA authorizes the NIGC to access and
inspect all papers, books and records
relating to gross revenues of Class II
gaming conducted on Indian lands and
any other matters necessary to carry out
the duties of the Commission. In
accordance with these statutory
responsibilities, NIGC regulations
require tribal gaming regulatory
authorities to establish and implement
tribal internal control standards that
provide a level of control that equals or
exceeds those set out in part 543,
establishing internal control standards.
NIGC regulations, 25 CFR 543.3 require
each affected gaming operation to
develop and implement an internal
control system that, at a minimum,
complies with the tribal internal control
standards established by the tribal
gaming regulatory authority. Section
543.3(f) requires tribes with gaming
operations to engage a certified public
accountant (CPA) to perform an agreedupon-procedures report to confirm
compliance with the standards
contained therein. The CPA is then
required to report its findings to the
tribe, tribal gaming regulatory authority,
and management.
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is mandatory according to
statutory regulations, and allows the
NIGC to confirm tribal compliance with
the standards contained in the AgreedUpon-Procedures report.
Respondents: Tribal governing bodies.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
422.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.5
hours.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly
Burden to Respondents: 211 hours.
Title: Facility License Standards.
OMB Control Number: 3141–0012.
Background: IGRA states that ‘‘a
separate license issued by the Indian
tribe shall be required for each place,
facility, or location on Indian lands at
which class II [and class III] gaming is
conducted.’’ 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(1) and
(d)(1)(A)(iii). Further, IGRA requires
‘‘the construction and maintenance of
the gaming facilities, and the operation
of that gaming is conducted in a manner
which adequately protects the
environment and public health and
safety.’’ 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(2)(E).
NIGC regulations, part 559 requires
that a tribe submit a notice to the NIGC
that it is considering issuing a facility
license, including applicable Indian
lands information, at least 120 days
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24733
before a new class II and/or class III
gaming facility is opened. The amount
of Indian lands information depends, in
part, on whether the Bureau of Indian
Affairs maintains the necessary records.
The Indian lands information will
continue to be utilized by the NIGC to
ensure that its records are complete for
internal purposes, such as assessing the
NIGC’s jurisdiction to regulate the
gaming on the parcel, as well as
responding to inquiries from
government agencies and Congress as to
the statuses of lands where Indian
gaming is proposed or occurring.
Part 559 also requires that tribes
submit copies of each newly issued or
renewed facility license to the NIGC
within 30 days of issuance, as well as
notices of facility closures. This
information will enable the NIGC to
maintain accurate, up-to-date records of
the Indian gaming facilities that are
operating on Indian lands in the United
States at any given point in time.
Currently, facility licenses must be
renewed every three years. With each
new facility license, the Tribe must
submit an attestation that it has
identified and enforces environment
and public health and safety laws and
that the tribe is in compliance with
those laws. Part 559 also requires tribes
to submit a document listing all
environmental and public safety laws,
resolutions, codes, policies and
standards applicable to its gaming
facility. If the submitted laws,
resolutions, etc. do not change, the tribe
need only certify that fact when
submitting a renewed facility license.
Finally, the NIGC Chair has the
discretion to request environmental and
public health and safety documentation
on occasions when there is an
identified, substantial concern. Through
these submissions, the NIGC can ensure
that the tribes have determined that the
construction, maintenance, and
operation of their gaming facilities are
conducted in a manner that adequately
protects the environment and the public
health and safety.
This information collection serves
two purposes: (i) To receive up-to-date
information from tribes regarding the
number of licensed Indian gaming
facilities and the Indian lands status of
the site of each gaming facility; and (ii)
to obtain certifications from the tribes
that the construction, maintenance, and
operation of the gaming facilities are
conducted in a manner that adequately
protects the environment and the public
health and safety.
Brief Description of Collection: This
collection is mandatory and enables the
NIGC to conduct its statutory duty to
regulate Indian gaming by ensuring that
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
24734
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices
tribal gaming facilities are properly
licensed by the tribes.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming
operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
565.
Estimated Annual Responses: 75.
Estimated Time per Response: The
range of time can vary from 2 burden
hours to 10 burden hours for one item.
Frequency of Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: $13,125.
Paxton Myers,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2012–9922 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–MWR–INDU–0312–8330; 6065–4000–
409]
Final White-tailed Deer Management
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement
for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
announces the availability of the Final
White-tailed Deer Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement,
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore,
Indiana.
SUMMARY:
The Final White-tailed Deer
Management Plan/Environmental
Impact Statement (Plan/EIS) will remain
available for public review for 30 days
following the publishing of the notice of
availability in the Federal Register by
the Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: The Plan/EIS is available
via the Internet through the NPS
Planning, Environment, and Public
Comment Web site (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/INDU); click on
the link for the Plan/EIS. You may also
obtain a copy of the Plan/EIS by sending
a request to Randy Knutson, Wildlife
Biologist, Indiana Dunes National
Lakeshore, 1100 North Mineral Springs
Road, Porter, Indiana 46304; telephone
219–395–1550. A copy may also be
picked-up in person at the National
Lakeshore’s headquarters at the address
listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Constantine Dillon,
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, at
the address above or by telephone at
219–395–1699.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Plan/
EIS describes four alternatives for the
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Apr 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
management of deer at the National
Lakeshore. Action is needed at this time
to ensure that the local deer population
does not become a dominant force that
negatively influences ecosystem
components within the National
Lakeshore, such as sensitive vegetation
or other wildlife. Impacts to these
National Lakeshore resources would
compromise its purpose to preserve the
exceptional biodiversity found within
its boundaries. The National Lakeshore
staff currently implements resource
management actions to protect other
resources but no specific deer
management plan exists.
Under Alternative A (no action),
current deer management actions
(including limited fencing, limited use
of repellents, and inventorying and
monitoring efforts) would continue; no
new deer management actions would be
taken. Alternative B would include all
actions described under Alternative A,
but would also incorporate non-lethal
actions to possibly reduce deer numbers
in the lakeshore. The additional actions
would include the construction of
additional small- and new large-scale
exclosures, more extensive use of
repellents in areas where fenced
exclosures would not be appropriate or
feasible, and phasing in reproductive
control of does when there is a federally
approved fertility control agent for
application to free-ranging populations
that provides multi-year (three to five
years) efficacy for does. Alternative C
would include all actions described
under Alternative A, but would also
incorporate a direct reduction of the
deer herd size through sharpshooting
and capture/euthanasia, where
appropriate. Alternative D (the preferred
alternative) would also include all the
actions described under Alternative A,
but would incorporate a combination of
specific lethal and non-lethal actions
from Alternatives B and C. These
actions would include the reduction of
the deer herd through sharpshooting, in
combination with capture/euthanasia
and phasing in reproductive control of
does (as described in alternative B) for
longer-term maintenance of lower herd
numbers when there is a federally
approved fertility control agent for
application to free-ranging populations
that provides multi-year (three to five
years) efficacy for does.
The potential environmental
consequences of the alternatives are
addressed for vegetation, soils and water
quality, white-tailed deer, other wildlife
and wildlife habitat, sensitive and rare
species, archeological resources,
cultural landscapes, visitor use and
experience, social values, visitor and
employee health and safety,
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
soundscapes, socioeconomic conditions,
and National Lakeshore management
and operations.
Dated: March 26, 2012.
Michael T. Reynolds,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–9972 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FH–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
[Docket No. BOEM–2012–0011]
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
Renewable Energy Program Leasing
for Marine Hydrokinetic Technology
Testing Offshore Florida
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of the Availability of an
Environmental Assessment.
AGENCY:
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management (BOEM) has prepared an
environmental assessment (EA)
considering the reasonably foreseeable
environmental impacts and
socioeconomic effects of issuing a lease
in Official Protraction Diagram NG 17–
06, Blocks 7003, 7053, and 7054,
offshore Florida. The proposed lease
would authorize technology testing
activities, including the installation,
operation, relocation, and
decommissioning of technology testing
facilities. The purpose of this notice is
to inform the public of the availability
of the EA for review and to solicit
public comments on the EA.
Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1), which
is a section in the regulations
implementing section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act, 16
U.S.C. 470f, BOEM has made a finding
of ‘‘no historic properties affected’’ for
this proposed project. The finding and
supporting documentation have been
submitted to the Florida State Historic
Preservation Officer and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation and are
included in the EA for public
inspection.
BOEM will conduct a public
information session at the following
location and time to explain the
proposed activities and provide
additional opportunities for public
input on the EA: Broward County Main
Library, 100 S Andrews Ave., Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33301–7528,
Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 2 p.m.
The EA and information on the public
session can be found online at: https://
www.boem.gov/Renewable-EnergyProgram/State-Activities/Florida.aspx.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24730-24734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9922]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
Submission of Information Collection Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act; Reinstatement
AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming Commission (``NIGC'' or
``Commission''), in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, is
seeking reinstatement of approval from the Office of Management and
Budget for collection of information for the following information
collection activities: (1) Compliance and enforcement under the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) ; (2) approval of Class II background
Investigation tribal licenses; (3) management contract regulations; (4)
National Environmental Policy Act procedures; (5) annual fees payable
by Indian gaming operations; (6) issuance of certificates of self
regulation to tribes for Class II gaming; (7) minimum internal control
standards; and (8) facility license review. These information
collections have expired.
DATES: Submit comments on or before May 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments can be mailed directly to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Desk Officer for the National Indian
Gaming Commission, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including
copies of the proposed collection of information and supporting
documentation, contact Michael Hoenig, at (202) 632-7003; fax (202)
632-7066 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Request for Comments
You are invited to comment on the following items to the Desk
Office at
[[Page 24731]]
OMB at the citation in the ADDRESSES section.
(a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden (including
the hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the methodology and assumption used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other collection techniques or
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and become a matter of public record. We will not request nor sponsor a
collection of information, and you need not respond to such a request,
if there is no valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.
II. Data
Title: Compliance and Enforcement.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0001.
Background: IGRA governs the regulation of gaming on Indian lands.
Although IGRA places primary responsibility with the tribes for
regulating their gaming activity, Sec. 2706(b) directs the NIGC to
monitor Class II gaming conducted on Indian lands on a continuing
basis. IGRA authorizes the NIGC to access and inspect all papers, books
and records relating to gross revenues of Class II gaming conducted on
Indian lands and any other matters necessary to carry out the duties of
the Commission. IGRA also requires tribes to provide NIGC with annual
independent audits of gaming, including contracts in excess of
$25,000.00. 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(2)(c), (d); 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(1)(A)(ii).
In accordance with these statutory responsibilities, NIGC regulations,
25 CFR 571.7, requires Indian gaming operations to keep permanent
financial records. NIGC regulations, 25 CFR 571.12 and 571.13, require
tribes to annually submit an independent audit of their gaming
operations to NIGC. The NIGC uses this information to fulfill its
statutory responsibilities under IGRA. Additionally, IGRA, 25 U.S.C.
2713, authorizes the NIGC Chair to issue notices of violation, civil
fine assessments, and closure orders for violations of the Act or the
Commission's regulations. This authority is implemented through 25 CFR
part 575. The full Commission reviews these matters on appeal under 25
CFR part 577.
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is mandatory and
allows the NIGC to conduct its statutory duty to regulate Indian
gaming. No additional burden is imposed by the requirements to maintain
customary business records and to allow NIGC personnel access to those
records.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 422.
Estimated Annual Responses: 1,395.
Estimated Time per Response: The range of time can vary from no
additional burden hours to 50 burden hours for one item.
Frequency of Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 6,752.
Title: Approval of Class II and Class III Ordinances, Background
Investigations and Gaming Licenses.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0003.
Background: The Act sets standards for the regulation of gaming,
including requirements for approval or disapproval of tribal gaming
ordinances. IGRA, Sec. 2705(a)(3), requires the NIGC Chair to review
all class II and class III tribal gaming ordinances.
In accordance with this provision, NIGC regulations, 25 CFR 522.2,
require tribes to submit to the NIGC: (1) A copy of the gaming
ordinance to be approved, including a copy of the authorizing
resolution by which it was enacted by the tribal government and a
request for approval of the ordinance or resolution; (2) a description
of procedures the tribe will employ in conducting background
investigations on key employees or primary management officials; (3) a
description of procedures the tribe will use to issue licenses to
primary management officials and key employees; (4) copies of all
gaming regulations; (5) a copy of any applicable tribal-state compact;
(6) a description of dispute resolution procedures for disputes arising
between the gaming public and the tribe or management contractor; (7)
identification of the law enforcement agency that will take
fingerprints and a description of the procedures for conducting
criminal history checks; and (8) designation of an agent for service of
process.
Under NIGC regulations, 25 CFR 522.3, tribes must submit any
amendment to the ordinance or resolution for approval by the NIGC
Chair. In this instance, the tribe must provide a copy of the
authorizing resolution. The NIGC will use the information collected to
approve or disapprove the ordinance or amendment.
Section 2710 of the Act requires tribes to conduct background
investigations on key employees and primary management officials
involved in class II and class III gaming. NIGC regulations, 25 CFR
522.4(b)(4), require a tribe's ordinance to provide that the tribe will
perform background investigations and issue licenses for key employees
and primary management officials according to requirements that are at
least as stringent as those in NIGC regulations, 25 CFR parts 556 and
558. 25 CFR parts 556 and 558 require tribes to perform each
investigation using information such as name, address, previous
employment records, previous relationships with either Indian tribes or
the gaming industry, licensing relating to those relationships, any
convictions, and any other information a tribe feels is relevant to the
employment of the individuals being investigated. 25 CFR 556.4. Tribes
are then required to submit to the NIGC a copy of the completed
employment applications and investigative reports and licensing
eligibility determinations on key employees or primary management
officials before issuing gaming licenses to those persons. 25 CFR
556.5. The NIGC uses this information to review the eligibility and
suitability determinations tribes make and advises them if it disagrees
with any particular determination.
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is mandatory and
allows the NIGC to carry out its statutory duties and gives the
respondents standards for compliance.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 282.
Estimated Annual Responses: 112,677.
Estimated Time per Response: The range of time can vary from .5
burden hours to 80 burden hours for one item.
Frequency of Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours on Respondents: 36,973 hours.
Title: Management Contract Regulations.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0004.
Background: Subject to the approval of the NIGC Chair, an Indian
tribe may enter into a gaming management contract for the operation and
management of tribal gaming activity. 25 U.S.C. 2710(e) and 2711. In
approving a management contract, the Chair shall require and obtain the
following: Name, address, and other
[[Page 24732]]
pertinent background information on each person or entity having a
financial interest in, or management responsibility for such contract,
and in the case of a corporation those individuals who serve on the
board of directors of such corporation and certain stockholders; a
description of previous experience that each person has had with other
Indian gaming contracts or with the gaming industry including any
gaming licenses which the person holds; and a complete financial
statement of each person listed. 25 CFR 533.3; 25 CFR 537.1(b).
Under NIGC regulations, 25 CFR part 533, the Chair requires the
submission of the contract to contain the following: original
signatures; any collateral agreements to the contract; a tribal
ordinance or resolution authorizing the submission and supporting
documentation; a three-year business plan which sets forth the parties'
goals, objectives, budgets, financial plans, related matters, income
statements, sources and use of funds statements for the previous three
years; and, for any contract exceeding five years or which includes a
management fee of more than 30 percent, justification that the capital
investment required and income projections for the gaming operation
require the longer duration or the additional fee.
Under NIGC regulations, 25 CFR part 535, the Chair may approve a
modification to a management contract or an assignment of that
management contract based on information similar to that required under
part 533. Part 535 also specifies that the Chair may void a previous
management contract approval and allows the parties the opportunity to
submit information relevant to that determination.
25 CFR part 537 specifies the requirements for submission of
background information in amplification of the statutory requirement
for obtaining information on persons and entities having a direct
financial interest in or management responsibility for a management
contract. Finally, 25 CFR part 539 permits appeals to the Commission
from a decision of the Chair to disapprove a management contract and
allows the Indian tribe and the management company an opportunity to
provide information relevant to that appeal. The NIGC will use the
information collected to either approve or disapprove the contract or,
in the case of an appeal, to grant or deny the appeal.
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is mandatory, and
the benefit to the respondents is the approval of Indian gaming
management contracts.
Respondents: Tribal governing bodies and management contractors.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 183 (submission of contracts,
contract amendments, and background investigation submissions).
Estimated Time per Response: The range of time can vary from no
added burden hours to 50 burden hours for one item.
Frequency of Response: Usually no more than once a year.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly Burden to Respondents: Up to 3,890.
Title: NEPA Procedures.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0006.
Background: NEPA requires federal agencies to analyze proposed
major federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. The NIGC has identified one type of action it
undertakes that requires review under NEPA--approving third-party
management contracts for the operation of gaming activity under IGRA,
25 U.S.C. 2711. Depending on the nature of the subject contract and
other circumstances, approval of such management contracts may be
categorically excluded from NEPA, it may require the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment (``EA''), or it may require the preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement (``EIS''). In any case, the
proponents of a management contract will be expected to submit
information to the NIGC and assist in the development of the required
NEPA documentation.
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is mandatory under
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.,
and White House Council on Environmental Quality regulations, 40 CFR
1500-1508.
Respondents: Tribal governing bodies, management companies, and
environmental consultants.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 6 per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The range of time can vary from 1,300
to 4,500 hours per response. This variation depends on whether the
response is an EA or EIS.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 12,300 (6 EAs x 1,300
hours) + 1 EIS at 4,500 hours for EIS.
Title: Annual Fees Payable by Indian Gaming Operations.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0007.
Background: IGRA requires the NIGC to set an annual funding rate.
The annual funding rate is the primary mechanism for NIGC funding under
25 U.S.C. 2717, and NIGC regulations, 25 CFR part 514 implements the
requirement. Fees are computed on the basis of the assessable gross
revenues of each gaming operation using rates set by the NIGC. The
total of all fees assessed annually cannot exceed 0.08 percent of gross
gaming revenue. Under its implementing regulation for the fee payment
program, 25 C.F.R. part 514, the NIGC relies on a quarterly statement
of gross gaming revenues provided by each gaming operation that is
subject to the fee requirement. When the Office of Management and
Budget last approved the collection of information for annual fees, the
NIGC required quarterly submissions of fees and worksheets. Although
the Commission later changed part 514 to require biannual submissions
of fees and fee worksheets, the Agency has published a final rule in
the Federal Register restoring the submission requirements to
quarterly. That rule goes into effect on October 1, 2012, and the
implementation date for quarterly submissions is January 1, 2013. The
final rule can be found at 77 FR 5178 and on the NIGC's web site. The
required information is needed for the NIGC to both set and adjust fee
rates and to support the computation of fees paid by each gaming
operation.
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is mandatory and
allows the NIGC to both set and adjust fee rates and to support the
computation of fees paid by each gaming operation.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 446.
Estimated Annual Responses: 892.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 hours.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours per Respondent: 4.
Frequency of Response: Twice per year.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,784 hours.
Title: Issuance of Certificates of Self Regulation to Tribe for
Class II Gaming, 25 CFR part 518.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0008.
Background: IGRA allows any Indian tribe that has conducted class
II gaming for at least three years to petition the NIGC for a
certificate of self-regulation for its class II gaming operations. The
NIGC will issue the certificate if it determines from available
information that the tribe has conducted its gaming activity in a
manner which has resulted in an effective and honest accounting of all
revenues, a reputation for safe, fair, and honest operation of the
gaming activity, and an enterprise free of evidence of criminal or
dishonest activity. The tribe must also have adopted and implement
proper accounting, licensing, and enforcement
[[Page 24733]]
systems and conducted the gaming operation on a fiscally or
economically sound basis. The implementing regulation at 25 CFR part
518 requires a tribe interested in receiving the certificate to file a
petition with the NIGC describing, generally, the tribe's gaming
operations, its regulatory process, its uses of net gaming revenue, and
its accounting and recordkeeping systems for the gaming operation. The
tribe must also provide copies of various documents in support of the
petition. Submission of the petition and supporting documentation is
voluntary. The NIGC will use the information submitted by the
respondent tribe in determining whether to issue the certificate of
self-regulation.
Those tribes who have been issued a certificate of self-regulation
are required to submit annually a report to the NIGC. Such report shall
set forth information to establish that the tribe has continuously met
the eligibility requirements of 25 CFR 518.2 and the approval
requirements of 25 CFR 518.4 and shall include a report with supporting
documentation which explains how tribal gaming revenues were used in
accordance with the requirements of IGRA, 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(2)(B).
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is voluntary for
those tribes petitioning for a certificate of self-regulation and
mandatory for those tribes who hold a certificate of self-regulation
according to statutory regulations, and the benefit to the respondents
is a reduction of the amount of fees assessed on class II gaming
revenue by the NIGC.
Respondents: Tribal governments; tribes who hold certificates of
self-regulation; petition submission is voluntary; annual report
submission is mandatory.
Estimated Number of Voluntary Respondents: 0.
Estimated Time per Voluntary Response: 0.
Frequency of Response: At will.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly Burden to Voluntary Respondents: 0.
Number of Mandatory Respondents: 2.
Estimated Time per Mandatory Response: 50.
Frequency of Mandatory Response: Annual.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly Burden to Mandatory Respondents: 100.
Title: Minimum Internal Control Standards.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0009.
Background: IGRA governs the regulation of gaming on Indian lands.
Although the IGRA places primary responsibility with the tribes for
regulating Class II gaming, Section 2706(b) of IGRA directs the NIGC to
monitor Class II gaming conducted on Indian lands on a continuing
basis. IGRA authorizes the NIGC to access and inspect all papers, books
and records relating to gross revenues of Class II gaming conducted on
Indian lands and any other matters necessary to carry out the duties of
the Commission. In accordance with these statutory responsibilities,
NIGC regulations require tribal gaming regulatory authorities to
establish and implement tribal internal control standards that provide
a level of control that equals or exceeds those set out in part 543,
establishing internal control standards. NIGC regulations, 25 CFR 543.3
require each affected gaming operation to develop and implement an
internal control system that, at a minimum, complies with the tribal
internal control standards established by the tribal gaming regulatory
authority. Section 543.3(f) requires tribes with gaming operations to
engage a certified public accountant (CPA) to perform an agreed-upon-
procedures report to confirm compliance with the standards contained
therein. The CPA is then required to report its findings to the tribe,
tribal gaming regulatory authority, and management.
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is mandatory
according to statutory regulations, and allows the NIGC to confirm
tribal compliance with the standards contained in the Agreed-Upon-
Procedures report.
Respondents: Tribal governing bodies.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 422.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.5 hours.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Total Annual Hourly Burden to Respondents: 211 hours.
Title: Facility License Standards.
OMB Control Number: 3141-0012.
Background: IGRA states that ``a separate license issued by the
Indian tribe shall be required for each place, facility, or location on
Indian lands at which class II [and class III] gaming is conducted.''
25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(1) and (d)(1)(A)(iii). Further, IGRA requires ``the
construction and maintenance of the gaming facilities, and the
operation of that gaming is conducted in a manner which adequately
protects the environment and public health and safety.'' 25 U.S.C.
2710(b)(2)(E).
NIGC regulations, part 559 requires that a tribe submit a notice to
the NIGC that it is considering issuing a facility license, including
applicable Indian lands information, at least 120 days before a new
class II and/or class III gaming facility is opened. The amount of
Indian lands information depends, in part, on whether the Bureau of
Indian Affairs maintains the necessary records. The Indian lands
information will continue to be utilized by the NIGC to ensure that its
records are complete for internal purposes, such as assessing the
NIGC's jurisdiction to regulate the gaming on the parcel, as well as
responding to inquiries from government agencies and Congress as to the
statuses of lands where Indian gaming is proposed or occurring.
Part 559 also requires that tribes submit copies of each newly
issued or renewed facility license to the NIGC within 30 days of
issuance, as well as notices of facility closures. This information
will enable the NIGC to maintain accurate, up-to-date records of the
Indian gaming facilities that are operating on Indian lands in the
United States at any given point in time. Currently, facility licenses
must be renewed every three years. With each new facility license, the
Tribe must submit an attestation that it has identified and enforces
environment and public health and safety laws and that the tribe is in
compliance with those laws. Part 559 also requires tribes to submit a
document listing all environmental and public safety laws, resolutions,
codes, policies and standards applicable to its gaming facility. If the
submitted laws, resolutions, etc. do not change, the tribe need only
certify that fact when submitting a renewed facility license. Finally,
the NIGC Chair has the discretion to request environmental and public
health and safety documentation on occasions when there is an
identified, substantial concern. Through these submissions, the NIGC
can ensure that the tribes have determined that the construction,
maintenance, and operation of their gaming facilities are conducted in
a manner that adequately protects the environment and the public health
and safety.
This information collection serves two purposes: (i) To receive up-
to-date information from tribes regarding the number of licensed Indian
gaming facilities and the Indian lands status of the site of each
gaming facility; and (ii) to obtain certifications from the tribes that
the construction, maintenance, and operation of the gaming facilities
are conducted in a manner that adequately protects the environment and
the public health and safety.
Brief Description of Collection: This collection is mandatory and
enables the NIGC to conduct its statutory duty to regulate Indian
gaming by ensuring that
[[Page 24734]]
tribal gaming facilities are properly licensed by the tribes.
Respondents: Indian tribal gaming operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 565.
Estimated Annual Responses: 75.
Estimated Time per Response: The range of time can vary from 2
burden hours to 10 burden hours for one item.
Frequency of Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: $13,125.
Paxton Myers,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2012-9922 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P