Determination of Benchmark Compensation Amount for Certain Executives, 24226-24227 [2012-9747]
Download as PDF
24226
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
(202) 693–3010 (this is not a toll-free
number).
Questions of interpretation and/or
enforcement of regulations referenced in
this notice may be directed to: Michael
S. Jones, Acting Administrator, Office of
Policy Development and Research,
Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5641, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: (202) 693–3700 (this is not a
toll-free number).
This notice is available through the
printed Federal Register and
electronically via the https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/
collection.action?collectionCode=FR
Web site. Copies of this notice may be
obtained in alternative formats (Large
Print, Braille, Audio Tape or Disc), upon
request, by calling (202) 693–0023 (not
a toll-free number). TTY/TDD callers
may dial toll-free (877) 889–5627 to
obtain information or request materials
in alternative formats.
OMB has
approved under the PRA information
collection requirements contained in
recently revised final regulations under
the Immigration and Nationality Act
published by the Department of Labor in
the Federal Register on February 21,
2012. See 77 FR 10038. The purpose of
the Final Rule was to amend the H–2B
regulations at 20 CFR part 655, Subpart
A governing the certification of
temporary employment of
nonimmigrant workers in temporary or
seasonal non-agricultural employment
to provide for increased worker
protections and improve program
integrity.
On April 8, 2012, OMB approved the
Department’s information collection
request under Control Number 1215–
0466, thus giving effect to the
requirements, as announced and
published in the Federal Register on
February 21, 2012, under the PRA. The
current expiration date for OMB
authorization for this information
collection is April 30, 2015.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Signed in Washington, this 16th day of
April, 2012.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–9613 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FP–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Office of Federal Procurement Policy
Determination of Benchmark
Compensation Amount for Certain
Executives
Office of Federal Procurement
Policy, OMB.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Office of Management
and Budget is publishing the attached
memorandum to the Heads of Executive
Departments and Agencies announcing
that $763,029 is the ‘‘benchmark
compensation amount’’ for certain
executives in terms of costs allowable
under Federal Government contracts
during contractors’ fiscal year 2011.
This determination is required under
Section 39 of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act, as amended (41
U.S.C. 1127; formerly, 41 U.S.C. 435).
The benchmark compensation amount
applies to both defense and civilian
agencies.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Raymond Wong, Office of Federal
Procurement Policy, at 202–395–6805.
Lesley A. Field,
Acting Administrator, Office of Federal
Procurement Policy.
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES
FROM: Lesley A. Field, Acting
Administrator, Office of Federal
Procurement Policy
SUBJECT: Determination of Benchmark
Compensation Amount for Certain
Executives, Pursuant to Section 39 of
the Office of Federal Procurement
Policy Act, as amended (41 U.S.C.
1127)
This memorandum sets forth the
benchmark compensation amount for
certain executives as required by
Section 39 of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act, as
amended (41 U.S.C. 1127; formerly, 41
U.S.C. 435). The statutory benchmark
amount limits the allowability of
compensation costs under Federal
Government contracts as implemented
at FAR 31.205–6(p). In less technical
terms, the statute places a cap on the
amount of contractor-paid executive
compensation that the Federal
Government will reimburse, in the case
of those contractors that are performing
contracts that are of a cost-reimbursable
or other cost-based nature. It should be
noted that, while the statute places a
cap on the amount that the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Government will reimburse the
contractor, the statute does not limit the
amount of compensation that the
contractor actually pays to its
executives; contractors can, and do,
provide compensation to their
executives that exceed the statutory
benchmark compensation amount.
Section 39 of the OFPP Act sets out
a formula for determining the
benchmark compensation amount.
Specifically, the benchmark amount is
set at the median (50th percentile)
amount of compensation over a recent
12-month period for the five most
highly compensated employees in
management positions at each home
office and each segment of all publiclyowned companies with annual sales
over $50 million, and the determination
is based on analysis of data made
available by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Compensation
for the fiscal year means the total
amount of wages, salaries, bonuses,
restricted stock, deferred and
performance incentive compensation,
and other compensation for the year,
whether paid, earned, or otherwise
accruing, as recorded in the employer’s
cost accounting records for the year.
After consultation with the Director of
the Defense Contract Audit Agency,
OFPP has determined, pursuant to the
requirements of Section 39, that the
benchmark compensation amount for
certain executives for the contractors’
fiscal year (FY) 2011 is $763,029. This
amount is for contractors’ FY 2011 and
subsequent contractor fiscal years,
unless and until revised by OFPP. This
benchmark compensation amount
applies to contract costs incurred after
January 1, 2011, under covered
contracts of both the defense and
civilian procurement agencies as
specified in Section 39.
This past fall, the Administration
proposed that Congress, starting with
FY 2011, replace the existing statutory
formula for calculating the cap on the
amount that the Federal Government
will reimburse Federal contractors (both
defense and civilian). This proposal was
contained in the President’s Plan for
Economic Growth and Deficit
Reduction, which is on OMB’s Web site
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/
default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/
jointcommitteereport.pdf. In place of the
formula that is in Section 39, the
President’s Plan proposed (on page 21)
that Congress put in place a
reimbursement cap that would be equal
to the pay rate for the Federal
Government’s most senior executives,
who are the heads of the 15 Cabinet
departments and certain other highlevel officials. These senior-most
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
Federal officials are paid at the rate set
for positions at Level I of the Executive
Schedule (5 U.S.C. 5312). During
calendar year 2011, the pay for Level I
positions was $199,700, as set forth in
Schedule 5 to Executive Order 13561 of
December 22, 2010 (75 FR 81817, 81822;
December 29, 2010).
The President’s proposal was in
response to the fact that the existing
statutory formula (enacted in 1997) has
resulted in the reimbursement cap
tripling since the mid-1990s: whereas
the reimbursement ceiling for 1995 was
$250,000, the statutory formula has
resulted in substantial annual increases
in the subsequent years, so that by FY
2010 the reimbursement ceiling had
reached $693,951. And, as this notice
announces, the statutory formula has
resulted in a reimbursement ceiling for
FY 2011 of $763,029. This is an increase
in just one year of nearly $70,000—and
of 10%—in the amount that the
taxpayers can be required to reimburse
Federal contractors for the
compensation that the contractors have
decided to pay their executives. This
rate of growth in the cap (both from
1995 onward, and in this most recent
year) has far outpaced the rate of
inflation, the rate of growth of privatesector salaries generally, and the rate of
growth of Federal salaries—forcing our
taxpayers to reimburse contractors for
levels of executive compensation that
cannot be justified for Federal contract
work.
This is the direct result of the fact that
the statutory formula sets the
reimbursement ceiling, and increases it
from one year to the next, by reference
to considerations that have no
relationship to the type of work that
contractors are actually performing
under Federal contracts that are costreimbursable or are otherwise costbased. As noted above, the formula
under Section 39 requires that the
reimbursement ceiling be set, and
adjusted annually, by reference to the
amount that equals the following: the
median (50th percentile) amount of
compensation, over a recent 12-month
period, that all publicly-owned
companies with annual sales over $50
million have paid to their five most
highly compensated employees in
management positions at each home
office and each segment. It is this
formula, and not any comparable
improvement in contractor performance
(and the benefits that the taxpayers
receive from these contracts), that has
resulted in the one-year increase of
$70,000 (10%) from FY 2010 to FY
2011, and the tripling from 1995 to FY
2011, in the amount that the taxpayers
can be required to reimburse Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
contractors for the compensation that
the contractors have chosen to pay to
their senior executives.
By proposing to replace the existing
statutory formula with a reimbursement
cap that is tied to the salary of a Cabinet
official (such as the Secretary of
Defense), the President’s Plan would
bring parity between the amount that
the American public pays for the senior
executives of the Federal Government
and for the senior executives of those
contractors who perform work for the
Federal Government on a costreimbursable or other cost-based
arrangement. (As is the case with the
current formula under Section 39 of the
OFPP Act, the proposal in the
President’s Plan would not impose any
limits on the amount of compensation
that a contractor pays to its executives;
the proposed cap at the level of the
salaries of Cabinet officials would limit
only how much the taxpayers will
reimburse the contractors for the
compensation decisions that the
contractors have chosen.)
To date, Congress has not adopted the
Administration’s proposal to replace the
existing statutory formula for
determining the reimbursement cap.
However, in Section 803 of the recentlyenacted National Defense Authorization
Act for FY 2012 (H.R. 1540; P.L. 112–
81, December 31, 2011) (NDAA),
Congress did extend the applicability of
the existing cap to any contractor
employee performing under a ‘‘covered
contract’’ under 10 U.S.C. 2324 (which
are contracts awarded by the
Department of Defense, the Coast Guard,
and NASA), with the exception that
‘‘the Secretary of Defense may establish
one or more narrowly targeted
exceptions for scientists and engineers
upon a determination that such
exceptions are needed to ensure that the
Department of Defense has continued
access to needed skills and
capabilities.’’
The effect of this new statutory
provision is that, while the cap on
reimbursement based on the Section 39
formula is retained, it will now apply to
more employees—essentially all
employees performing covered contracts
for the Department of Defense, Coast
Guard, and NASA (with narrowly
targeted exceptions). This means that,
for the first time, there will be a
statutory cap (at the Section 39 level) on
reimbursement for employee
compensation for all employees
performing under covered contracts,
rather than only for a limited number of
executives as has been the rule under
Section 39 until now.
However, this broader application of
the Section 39 cap does not apply to FY
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24227
2011. That is because Section 803 of the
NDAA provides that its amendments
‘‘shall apply with respect to costs of
compensation incurred after January 1,
2012.’’ Accordingly, the benchmark
compensation amount in this notice, for
FY 2011, applies only to the same
limited number of contractor executives
as did the Section 39 caps for FY 2010
and prior years. The broader application
called for in Section 803 of the NDAA
will be implemented through regulation
and addressed in future notices.
Questions concerning this
memorandum may be addressed to
Raymond Wong, OFPP, at 202–395–
6805.
[FR Doc. 2012–9747 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Proposal Review Panel for Social and
Economic Sciences; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463 as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Site visit review of the
Nanoscale Science and Engineering
Center (NSEC) at Arizona State
University by the Division Social and
Economic Sciences (#10748).
Dates & Times:
May 2, 2012; 7 p.m.–9 p.m.
May 3, 2012: 7:45 a.m.–9:15 p.m.
May 4, 2012: 8 a.m.–3:30 p.m.
Place: Arizona State University,
Tempe, AZ.
Type of Meeting: Part open.
Contact Person: Dr. Frederick Kronz,
Program Director; Science, Technology
and Society Program; Division of Social
and Economic Sciences, Room 990,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230,
Telephone (703) 292–7283.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide
advice and recommendations
concerning further support of the NSEC
at the Arizona State University.
Agenda:
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
7 p.m.–9 p.m.
Session
Closed—Executive
Thursday, May 3, 2012
7:45 a.m.–4:30 p.m. Open—Review
of the NSEC
4:15 p.m.–5:45 p.m. Closed—
Executive Session
5:45 p.m.–9:15 p.m. Open—Poster
Session; Dinner
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24226-24227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9747]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Office of Federal Procurement Policy
Determination of Benchmark Compensation Amount for Certain
Executives
AGENCY: Office of Federal Procurement Policy, OMB.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget is publishing the attached
memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies
announcing that $763,029 is the ``benchmark compensation amount'' for
certain executives in terms of costs allowable under Federal Government
contracts during contractors' fiscal year 2011. This determination is
required under Section 39 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy
Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. 1127; formerly, 41 U.S.C. 435). The
benchmark compensation amount applies to both defense and civilian
agencies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raymond Wong, Office of Federal
Procurement Policy, at 202-395-6805.
Lesley A. Field,
Acting Administrator, Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
FROM: Lesley A. Field, Acting Administrator, Office of Federal
Procurement Policy
SUBJECT: Determination of Benchmark Compensation Amount for Certain
Executives, Pursuant to Section 39 of the Office of Federal Procurement
Policy Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. 1127)
This memorandum sets forth the benchmark compensation amount for
certain executives as required by Section 39 of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. 1127; formerly, 41
U.S.C. 435). The statutory benchmark amount limits the allowability of
compensation costs under Federal Government contracts as implemented at
FAR 31.205-6(p). In less technical terms, the statute places a cap on
the amount of contractor-paid executive compensation that the Federal
Government will reimburse, in the case of those contractors that are
performing contracts that are of a cost-reimbursable or other cost-
based nature. It should be noted that, while the statute places a cap
on the amount that the Federal Government will reimburse the
contractor, the statute does not limit the amount of compensation that
the contractor actually pays to its executives; contractors can, and
do, provide compensation to their executives that exceed the statutory
benchmark compensation amount.
Section 39 of the OFPP Act sets out a formula for determining the
benchmark compensation amount. Specifically, the benchmark amount is
set at the median (50th percentile) amount of compensation over a
recent 12-month period for the five most highly compensated employees
in management positions at each home office and each segment of all
publicly-owned companies with annual sales over $50 million, and the
determination is based on analysis of data made available by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Compensation for the fiscal year
means the total amount of wages, salaries, bonuses, restricted stock,
deferred and performance incentive compensation, and other compensation
for the year, whether paid, earned, or otherwise accruing, as recorded
in the employer's cost accounting records for the year.
After consultation with the Director of the Defense Contract Audit
Agency, OFPP has determined, pursuant to the requirements of Section
39, that the benchmark compensation amount for certain executives for
the contractors' fiscal year (FY) 2011 is $763,029. This amount is for
contractors' FY 2011 and subsequent contractor fiscal years, unless and
until revised by OFPP. This benchmark compensation amount applies to
contract costs incurred after January 1, 2011, under covered contracts
of both the defense and civilian procurement agencies as specified in
Section 39.
This past fall, the Administration proposed that Congress, starting
with FY 2011, replace the existing statutory formula for calculating
the cap on the amount that the Federal Government will reimburse
Federal contractors (both defense and civilian). This proposal was
contained in the President's Plan for Economic Growth and Deficit
Reduction, which is on OMB's Web site at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/jointcommitteereport.pdf.
In place of the formula that is in Section 39, the President's Plan
proposed (on page 21) that Congress put in place a reimbursement cap
that would be equal to the pay rate for the Federal Government's most
senior executives, who are the heads of the 15 Cabinet departments and
certain other high-level officials. These senior-most
[[Page 24227]]
Federal officials are paid at the rate set for positions at Level I of
the Executive Schedule (5 U.S.C. 5312). During calendar year 2011, the
pay for Level I positions was $199,700, as set forth in Schedule 5 to
Executive Order 13561 of December 22, 2010 (75 FR 81817, 81822;
December 29, 2010).
The President's proposal was in response to the fact that the
existing statutory formula (enacted in 1997) has resulted in the
reimbursement cap tripling since the mid-1990s: whereas the
reimbursement ceiling for 1995 was $250,000, the statutory formula has
resulted in substantial annual increases in the subsequent years, so
that by FY 2010 the reimbursement ceiling had reached $693,951. And, as
this notice announces, the statutory formula has resulted in a
reimbursement ceiling for FY 2011 of $763,029. This is an increase in
just one year of nearly $70,000--and of 10%--in the amount that the
taxpayers can be required to reimburse Federal contractors for the
compensation that the contractors have decided to pay their executives.
This rate of growth in the cap (both from 1995 onward, and in this most
recent year) has far outpaced the rate of inflation, the rate of growth
of private-sector salaries generally, and the rate of growth of Federal
salaries--forcing our taxpayers to reimburse contractors for levels of
executive compensation that cannot be justified for Federal contract
work.
This is the direct result of the fact that the statutory formula
sets the reimbursement ceiling, and increases it from one year to the
next, by reference to considerations that have no relationship to the
type of work that contractors are actually performing under Federal
contracts that are cost-reimbursable or are otherwise cost-based. As
noted above, the formula under Section 39 requires that the
reimbursement ceiling be set, and adjusted annually, by reference to
the amount that equals the following: the median (50th percentile)
amount of compensation, over a recent 12-month period, that all
publicly-owned companies with annual sales over $50 million have paid
to their five most highly compensated employees in management positions
at each home office and each segment. It is this formula, and not any
comparable improvement in contractor performance (and the benefits that
the taxpayers receive from these contracts), that has resulted in the
one-year increase of $70,000 (10%) from FY 2010 to FY 2011, and the
tripling from 1995 to FY 2011, in the amount that the taxpayers can be
required to reimburse Federal contractors for the compensation that the
contractors have chosen to pay to their senior executives.
By proposing to replace the existing statutory formula with a
reimbursement cap that is tied to the salary of a Cabinet official
(such as the Secretary of Defense), the President's Plan would bring
parity between the amount that the American public pays for the senior
executives of the Federal Government and for the senior executives of
those contractors who perform work for the Federal Government on a
cost-reimbursable or other cost-based arrangement. (As is the case with
the current formula under Section 39 of the OFPP Act, the proposal in
the President's Plan would not impose any limits on the amount of
compensation that a contractor pays to its executives; the proposed cap
at the level of the salaries of Cabinet officials would limit only how
much the taxpayers will reimburse the contractors for the compensation
decisions that the contractors have chosen.)
To date, Congress has not adopted the Administration's proposal to
replace the existing statutory formula for determining the
reimbursement cap. However, in Section 803 of the recently-enacted
National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 (H.R. 1540; P.L. 112-81,
December 31, 2011) (NDAA), Congress did extend the applicability of the
existing cap to any contractor employee performing under a ``covered
contract'' under 10 U.S.C. 2324 (which are contracts awarded by the
Department of Defense, the Coast Guard, and NASA), with the exception
that ``the Secretary of Defense may establish one or more narrowly
targeted exceptions for scientists and engineers upon a determination
that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department of
Defense has continued access to needed skills and capabilities.''
The effect of this new statutory provision is that, while the cap
on reimbursement based on the Section 39 formula is retained, it will
now apply to more employees--essentially all employees performing
covered contracts for the Department of Defense, Coast Guard, and NASA
(with narrowly targeted exceptions). This means that, for the first
time, there will be a statutory cap (at the Section 39 level) on
reimbursement for employee compensation for all employees performing
under covered contracts, rather than only for a limited number of
executives as has been the rule under Section 39 until now.
However, this broader application of the Section 39 cap does not
apply to FY 2011. That is because Section 803 of the NDAA provides that
its amendments ``shall apply with respect to costs of compensation
incurred after January 1, 2012.'' Accordingly, the benchmark
compensation amount in this notice, for FY 2011, applies only to the
same limited number of contractor executives as did the Section 39 caps
for FY 2010 and prior years. The broader application called for in
Section 803 of the NDAA will be implemented through regulation and
addressed in future notices.
Questions concerning this memorandum may be addressed to Raymond
Wong, OFPP, at 202-395-6805.
[FR Doc. 2012-9747 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P