Energy Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay Corporation v. New York Independent System Operator; Notice of Complaint, 24192-24193 [2012-9654]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24192
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
estimates that it would cost $401,810 to
abandon the Tate Island facilities.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to
Michele Willis, Manager, Regulatory &
Compliance, CenterPoint Energy Gas
Transmission Company, LLC, P.O. Box
21734, Shreveport, Louisiana 71151, or
via telephone at (318) 429–3708.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy to
the applicant and to every other party in
the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commenters
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions via the Internet in lieu
of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a) (1)
(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (www.ferc.gov)
under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on May 4, 2012.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–9652 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL12–55–000]
SIG Energy, LLLP v. California
Independent System Operator
Corporation; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on April 4, 2012,
pursuant to section 206 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s
(Commission) Rules and Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and sections
206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act,
16 U.S.C. 824(e) and 825(e), SIG Energy,
LLLP (Complainant) filed a formal
complaint against the California
Independent System Operator
Corporation (Respondent) alleging that
the Respondent violated its open access
transmission tariff (OATT) and the
Respondent’s determination of the
settlement price for congestion revenue
rights contracts at certain pricing nodes
on certain dates in August 2011 resulted
in unjust and unreasonable rates, in
violation of the filed rate doctrine and
the Respondent’s OATT and related
Business Practice Manuals.
The Complainant certifies that public
version copies of the complaint were
served on the contacts for the
Respondent as listed on the
Commission’s list of Corporate Officials
and on the California Public Utilities
Commission.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on April 24, 2012.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–9653 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL12–56–000]
Energy Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay
Corporation v. New York Independent
System Operator; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on April 12, 2012,
pursuant to section 205 of the Federal
Power Act and Rule 206 of the Rules of
Practice and Procedure of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission), 18 CFR 385.206, Energy
Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay
Corporation (Complainants) collectively
filed a formal complaint against New
York Independent System Operator
(Respondent or NYISO) alleging that the
Respondent violated the Federal Power
Act, the Commission’s orders and
policies, and the NYISO’s Market
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
Administration and Control Area
Services Tariff as a result of NYISO’s
issuance of Technical Bulletin No. 217
on April 6, 2012. The Complainants
contend that the technical bulletin
prohibits participating sellers from
including energy consumed from
‘‘behind the meter’’ generation eligible
to participate in the NYISO’s Special
Case Resources Program.
The Complaints certify that copies of
the complaint were served on the
contacts for NYISO as listed on the
Commission’s list of Corporate Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on April 19, 2012.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–9654 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. PF12–6–000]
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC;
Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the
Planned Line MB Loop Extension
Project, Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Public Scoping Meeting
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
24193
Commission) will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of
the Line MB Loop 1 Extension (Line MB)
involving construction and operation of
facilities by Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC (Columbia) in
Baltimore and Harford Counties,
Maryland. This EA will be used by the
Commission in its decision-making
process to determine whether the
project is in the public convenience and
necessity.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process the Commission
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on the project.
Your input will help the Commission
staff determine what issues they need to
evaluate in the EA. Please note that the
scoping period will close on May 16,
2012.
This notice is being sent to the
Commission’s current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and
local government representatives should
notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern.
Comments may be submitted in
written form or verbally. Further details
on how to submit written comments are
provided in the Public Participation
section of this notice. In lieu of or in
addition to sending written comments,
we 2 invite you to attend the public
scoping meetings scheduled as follows:
Location
May 8, 2012, 7 p.m. EDT ..................................................
May 9, 2012, 7 p.m. EDT ..................................................
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Date and Time
Oregon Ridge Lodge, 13401 Beaver Dam Road, Cockeysville, MD 21030.
Youth’s Benefit Elementary School Cafeteria, 1901 Fallston Road, Fallston, MD
21047.
The public meetings are designed to
provide you with more detailed
information and another opportunity to
offer your comments on the proposed
project. Columbia representatives will
be present one hour before each meeting
to describe their proposal, present maps,
and answer questions. Interested groups
and individuals are encouraged to
attend the meetings and to present
comments on the issues they believe
should be addressed in the EA. A
transcript of each meeting will be made
so that your comments will be
accurately recorded.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, you may be contacted by a
pipeline company representative about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
planned facilities. The pipeline
company would seek to negotiate a
mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if Line MB is approved by the
Commission, that approval conveys
with it the right of eminent domain.
Therefore, if easement negotiations fail
to produce an agreement, the pipeline
company could initiate condemnation
proceedings where compensation would
1 A pipeline loop is a segment of pipe constructed
parallel to an existing pipeline to increase capacity.
2 ‘‘We’’, ‘‘us’’, and ‘‘our’’ refer to the
environmental staff of the Office of Energy Projects
(OEP).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be determined in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This
fact sheet addresses a number of
typically-asked questions, including the
use of eminent domain and how to
participate in the Commission’s
proceedings.
Summary of the Planned Project
Columbia plans to construct about
21.3 miles of 26-inch-diameter pipeline
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24192-24193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9654]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL12-56-000]
Energy Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay Corporation v. New York
Independent System Operator; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on April 12, 2012, pursuant to section 205 of the
Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), 18 CFR
385.206, Energy Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay Corporation (Complainants)
collectively filed a formal complaint against New York Independent
System Operator (Respondent or NYISO) alleging that the Respondent
violated the Federal Power Act, the Commission's orders and policies,
and the NYISO's Market
[[Page 24193]]
Administration and Control Area Services Tariff as a result of NYISO's
issuance of Technical Bulletin No. 217 on April 6, 2012. The
Complainants contend that the technical bulletin prohibits
participating sellers from including energy consumed from ``behind the
meter'' generation eligible to participate in the NYISO's Special Case
Resources Program.
The Complaints certify that copies of the complaint were served on
the contacts for NYISO as listed on the Commission's list of Corporate
Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 19, 2012.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9654 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P