SIG Energy, LLLP v. California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of Complaint, 24192 [2012-9653]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24192
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
estimates that it would cost $401,810 to
abandon the Tate Island facilities.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to
Michele Willis, Manager, Regulatory &
Compliance, CenterPoint Energy Gas
Transmission Company, LLC, P.O. Box
21734, Shreveport, Louisiana 71151, or
via telephone at (318) 429–3708.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy to
the applicant and to every other party in
the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commenters
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions via the Internet in lieu
of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a) (1)
(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (www.ferc.gov)
under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on May 4, 2012.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–9652 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL12–55–000]
SIG Energy, LLLP v. California
Independent System Operator
Corporation; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on April 4, 2012,
pursuant to section 206 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s
(Commission) Rules and Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and sections
206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act,
16 U.S.C. 824(e) and 825(e), SIG Energy,
LLLP (Complainant) filed a formal
complaint against the California
Independent System Operator
Corporation (Respondent) alleging that
the Respondent violated its open access
transmission tariff (OATT) and the
Respondent’s determination of the
settlement price for congestion revenue
rights contracts at certain pricing nodes
on certain dates in August 2011 resulted
in unjust and unreasonable rates, in
violation of the filed rate doctrine and
the Respondent’s OATT and related
Business Practice Manuals.
The Complainant certifies that public
version copies of the complaint were
served on the contacts for the
Respondent as listed on the
Commission’s list of Corporate Officials
and on the California Public Utilities
Commission.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on April 24, 2012.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–9653 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL12–56–000]
Energy Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay
Corporation v. New York Independent
System Operator; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on April 12, 2012,
pursuant to section 205 of the Federal
Power Act and Rule 206 of the Rules of
Practice and Procedure of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission), 18 CFR 385.206, Energy
Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay
Corporation (Complainants) collectively
filed a formal complaint against New
York Independent System Operator
(Respondent or NYISO) alleging that the
Respondent violated the Federal Power
Act, the Commission’s orders and
policies, and the NYISO’s Market
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9653]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL12-55-000]
SIG Energy, LLLP v. California Independent System Operator
Corporation; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on April 4, 2012, pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules and Practice
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and sections 206 and 306 of the Federal
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(e) and 825(e), SIG Energy, LLLP (Complainant)
filed a formal complaint against the California Independent System
Operator Corporation (Respondent) alleging that the Respondent violated
its open access transmission tariff (OATT) and the Respondent's
determination of the settlement price for congestion revenue rights
contracts at certain pricing nodes on certain dates in August 2011
resulted in unjust and unreasonable rates, in violation of the filed
rate doctrine and the Respondent's OATT and related Business Practice
Manuals.
The Complainant certifies that public version copies of the
complaint were served on the contacts for the Respondent as listed on
the Commission's list of Corporate Officials and on the California
Public Utilities Commission.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2012.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9653 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P