Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC); Working Group Activity Update, 24257-24264 [2012-9625]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
decisions may also be relied upon by
state and local agencies in proceedings
on the project. Section 4 of the
Introduction of the Tier 1 Final
Programmatic EIS and Section A of the
Record of Decision specify the decisions
being made at this Tier 1 level.
Challenges to these Tier 1 decisions
must be made within 180 days of this
notice or they will be barred. The
purpose for transportation
improvements is to increase capacity,
improve accessibility and mobility, and
decrease congestion for travel demand
(projected to occur in 2050) to
destinations along the Corridor as well
as for interstate travel, while providing
for and accommodating environmental
sensitivity, community values,
transportation safety, and ability to
implement the proposed solutions for
the Corridor. FHWA NEPA documents:
Draft Programmatic EIS signed August
10, 2010, Final Programmatic EIS signed
February 24, 2011, ROD signed June 16,
2011. https://www.coloradodot.info/
projects/i-70mountaincorridor.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
John M. Cater,
Division Administrator, Lakewood, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2012–9754 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2000–7257; Notice No. 69]
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee
(RSAC); Working Group Activity
Update
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Announcement of Railroad
Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
Working Group Activities.
AGENCY:
The FRA is updating its
announcement of the RSAC Working
Group activities to reflect its current
status.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Woolverton, RSAC Designated
Federal Officer/Administrative Officer,
FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 493–6212; or Robert Lauby, Acting
Associate Administrator for Railroad
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Safety/Chief Safety Officer, FRA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Mailstop 25,
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493–6474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice serves to update FRA’s last
announcement of working group
activities and status reports of
November 28, 2011 (76 FR 72997). The
45th full RSAC meeting was held
December 8, 2011, and the 46th meeting
is scheduled for April 26, 2012, at the
National Association of Home Builders,
National Housing Center, located at
1201 15th Street NW., Washington, DC
20005.
Since its first meeting in April 1996,
the RSAC has accepted 38 tasks. Status
for each of the open tasks (neither
completed nor terminated) is provided
below:
Open Tasks
Task 96–4–Tourist and Historic
Railroads. Reviewing the
appropriateness of the agency’s current
policy regarding the applicability of
existing and proposed regulations to
tourist, excursion, scenic, and historic
railroads. This task was accepted on
April 2, 1996, and a working group was
established. The working group
monitored the steam locomotive
regulation task. Planned future activities
involve the review of other regulations
for possible adaptation to the safety
needs of tourist and historic railroads.
Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493–6474.
Task 03–01–Passenger Safety. This
task includes updating and enhancing
the regulations pertaining to passenger
safety, based on research and
experience. This task was accepted on
May 20, 2003, and a working group was
established. Prior to embarking on
substantive discussions of a specific
task, the working group set forth in
writing a specific description of the
task. The working group reports
planned activity to the full RSAC at
each scheduled full RSAC meeting,
including milestones for completion of
projects and progress toward
completion. At the first meeting, held
on September 9–10, 2003, a
consolidated list of issues was
completed. At the second meeting, held
on November 6–7, 2003, four task
groups were established: Emergency
Preparedness, Mechanical,
Crashworthiness, and Track/Vehicle
Interaction. The task forces met and
reported on activities for working group
consideration at the third meeting, held
on May 11–12, 2004, and a fourth
meeting was held October 26–27, 2004.
The working group met on March 21–
22, 2006, and again on September 12–
13, 2006, at which time the group
agreed to establish a task force on
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24257
General Passenger Safety. The full
Passenger Safety Working Group met on
April 17–18, 2007; December 11–12,
2007; November 13, 2008; and June 8,
2009. On August 5, 2009, the working
group was requested to establish an
Engineering Task Force (ETF) to
consider technical criteria and
procedures for qualifying alternative
passenger equipment designs as
equivalent in safety to equipment
meeting the design standards in the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards.
Consensus Tier III recommendations of
the ETF were developed and were
approved at a meeting on October 6–7,
2011, by the Passenger Safety Working
Group, and these recommendations
were approved by the full RSAC
Committee by electronic vote on March
2, 2012. These recommendations
address safety issues related to highspeed rail trainsets used in the United
States. No additional meetings are
currently scheduled. Contact: Charles
Bielitz, (202) 493–6314.
Engineering Task Force. The
Passenger Safety Working Group
approved a request from FRA to
establish an ETF under the Passenger
Safety Working Group in August 2009.
The mission of the task force is to
produce a set of technical evaluation
criteria and procedures for passenger
rail equipment built to alternative
designs. The technical evaluation
criteria and procedures would provide a
means of establishing whether an
alternative design would result in
performance at least equal to the
structural design standards set forth in
the Passenger Equipment Safety
Standards (Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 238). The initial
focus of this effort will be on Tier I
standards. When completed, the criteria
and procedures would form a technical
basis for making determinations
concerning equivalent safety pursuant
to 49 CFR 238.201, and provide a
technical framework for presenting
evidence to FRA in support of any
request for waiver of the compressive
(buff) strength requirement, as set forth
in 49 CFR 238.203. See 49 CFR Part 211,
Rules of Practice. The criteria and
procedures could be incorporated into
Part 238 at a later date after notice and
opportunity for public comment. The
ETF was formed and a kickoff meeting
was held on September 23–24, 2009.
The group held follow-on meetings
November 3–4, 2009; January 7–8, 2010;
and March 9–10, 2010. A followup
GoTo/Webinar meeting was held on July
12, 2010. The ETF developed a draft
‘‘Criteria and Procedures Report,’’ that
was approved by the Passenger Safety
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24258
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
Working Group during the September
16, 2010, meeting and by the RSAC
Committee during the September 23,
2010, meeting. The document has been
placed on the FRA Web site at the
following address: https://
www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/
RSAC_REPORT-%209-16-10.pdf.
Engineering Task Force II. To build on
the success of the ETF in developing a
set of alternative technical criteria and
procedures for evaluating the
crashworthiness and occupant
protection performance of passenger rail
equipment in service at conventional
operating speeds, FRA requested that
the Passenger Safety Working Group retask the group to concentrate on
developing crashworthiness and
occupant protection safety
recommendations for high-speed
passenger trains. The Passenger Safety
Working Group accepted the task on
July 28, 2010, by electronic vote. Under
the new task, the task force may address
any safety features of the equipment,
including but not limited to
crashworthiness, interior occupant
protection, glazing, emergency egress,
and fire safety features. Any type of
equipment may be addressed, including
conventional locomotives, high-speed
power cars, cab cars, multiple-unit (MU)
locomotives, and coach cars. The
equipment addressed may be used in
any type of passenger service, from
conventional-speed to high-speed.
Recommendations may take the form of
criteria and procedures, revisions to
existing regulations, or adoption of new
regulations, including rules of particular
applicability. The work of the re-tasked
ETF is intended to assist FRA in
developing appropriate safety standards
for the high-speed rail projects planned
in California and Nevada. The ETF II
held a kickoff meeting on October 21–
22, 2010, to begin work on the new
high-speed task, and had follow-on
meetings on January 11–12, 2011,
February 14–15, March 30–31, June 16–
17, and October 6–7, 2011. Consensus
Tier III recommendations of the ETF
were developed and were accepted by
vote during the meeting on October 6–
7, 2011. The ETF II has formed two
additional Task Groups to work in the
areas of track worthiness and brakes.
The Track Worthiness Task Group is
tasked to identify potential safety issues
related to operation of high-speed
trainsets on conventional track and to
make recommendations on how best to
mitigate any consequences. The Task
Group includes experts and key
stakeholders such as international
operators of high-speed equipment, car
builders, wheel/rail interaction
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
dynamics specialists, and other RSAC
working group members involved in
vehicle/track interaction. The Brakes
Task Group is tasked to review braking
system requirements and international
braking system requirements versus
existing U.S. requirements including
inspection and maintenance and
identify common features, determine
basic parameters, and consider use of
service proven braking systems. The
Task Group will also consider
performance-based provisions/
requirements with consideration for
operators to develop maintenance,
inspection, and service plans, and make
recommendations regarding brakes to
the ETF II as related to Tier III. The next
ETF meeting will be scheduled for June
2012. Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493–
6474.
Emergency Preparedness Task Force.
At the working group meeting on
March 9–10, 2005, the working group
received and approved the consensus
report of the Emergency Preparedness
Task Force related to emergency
communication, emergency egress, and
rescue access. These recommendations
were presented to and approved by the
full RSAC on May 18, 2005. The
working group met on September 7–8,
2005, and additional, supplementary
recommendations were presented to and
accepted by the full RSAC on October
11, 2005. The Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) was published on
August 24, 2006 (71 FR 50275), and was
open for comment until October 23,
2006. The working group agreed upon
recommendations for the final rule,
including resolution of final comments
received, during the April 17–18, 2007,
meeting. The recommendations were
presented to and approved by the full
RSAC on June 26, 2007. The Passenger
Train Emergency Systems final rule,
focusing on emergency communication,
emergency egress, and rescue access,
was published on February 1, 2008 (73
FR 6370). The task force met on October
17–18, 2007, and reached consensus on
the draft rule text for a followup NPRM
on Passenger Train Emergency Systems,
focusing on low location emergency exit
path marking, emergency lighting, and
emergency signage. The task force
presented the draft rule text to the
Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 11–12, 2007, and the
consensus draft rule text was presented
to, and approved by full RSAC vote
during the February 20, 2008, meeting.
During the May 13–14, 2008, meeting,
the task force recommended clarifying
the applicability of back-up emergency
communication system requirements in
the February 1, 2008, final rule, and
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FRA announced its intention to exercise
limited enforcement discretion for a
new provision amending instruction
requirements for emergency window
exit removal. The working group ratified
these recommendations on June 19,
2008. The task force met again on
March 31, 2009, to clarify issues related
to the followup NPRM raised by
members. The modified rule text was
presented to and approved by the
Passenger Safety Working Group on
June 8, 2009. The working group
requested that FRA draft the rule text
requiring daily inspection of removable
panels or windows in vestibule doors
and entrust the Emergency Preparedness
Task Force with reviewing the text. FRA
sent the draft text to the task force for
review and comment on August 4, 2009.
The draft rule text was approved by the
Passenger Safety Working Group by
mail ballot on December 23, 2009, and
the resultant NPRM was published
January 3, 2012 (77 FR 154). No
additional task force meetings are
currently scheduled. Contact: Brenda
Moscoso, (202) 493–6282.
Mechanical Task Force—Completed.
Initial recommendations on mechanical
issues (revisions to 49 CFR Part 238)
were approved by the full RSAC on
January 26, 2005. At the working group
meeting on September 7–8, 2005, the
task force presented additional
perfecting amendments and the full
RSAC approved them on October 11,
2005. An NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on December 8, 2005
(70 FR 73070). Public comments were
due by February 17, 2006. The final rule
was published in the Federal Register
on October 19, 2006 (71 FR 61835),
effective December 18, 2006.
Crashworthiness Task Force—
Completed. Among its efforts, the
Crashworthiness Task Force provided
consensus recommendations on staticend strength that were adopted by the
working group on September 7–8, 2005.
The full RSAC accepted the
recommendations on October 11, 2005.
The front-end strength of cab cars and
MU locomotives’ NPRM was published
in the Federal Register on August 1,
2007 (72 FR 42016), with comments due
by October 1, 2007. A number of
comments were entered into the docket,
and a Crashworthiness Task Force
meeting was held September 9, 2008, to
resolve comments on the NPRM. Based
on the consensus language agreed to at
the meeting, FRA has prepared the text
of the final rule incorporating the
resolutions made at the task force
meeting and the final rule language was
adopted at the Passenger Safety Working
Group meeting held on November 13,
2008. The language was presented and
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
approved at the December 10, 2008, full
RSAC meeting. The final rule was
issued on December 31, 2009, and
published on January 8, 2010 (75 FR
1180). Contact: Gary Fairbanks, (202)
493–6322.
Vehicle/Track Interaction Task Force.
The task force is developing proposed
revisions to 49 CFR Parts 213 and 238,
principally regarding high-speed
passenger service. The task force met on
October 9–11, 2007, and again on
November 19–20, 2007, in Washington,
DC, and presented the final task force
report and final recommendations and
proposed rule text for approval by the
Passenger Safety Working Group at the
December 11–12, 2007, meeting. The
final report and the proposed rule text
were approved by the working group
and were presented to and approved by
full RSAC vote during the February 20,
2008, meeting. The group met on
February 27–28, 2008, and by
teleconference on March 18, 2010, to
address unresolved issues, and the
NPRM was published on May 10, 2010
(75 FR 25928). The task force was called
back into session on August 5–6, 2010,
to review and consider NPRM
comments. The final rule will amend
the Track Safety Standards and
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards
for high-speed train operations and train
operations at high cant deficiencies to
promote the safe interaction of rail
vehicles with the track over which they
operate. It will revise both the safety
limits for these operations and the
process to qualify them. It accounts for
a range of vehicle types that are
currently used and may likely be used
on future high-speed or high cant
deficiency rail operations, and would
provide safety assurance for train
operations in all classes of track. It is
based on the results of simulation
studies designed to identify track
geometry irregularities associated with
unsafe wheel forces and acceleration,
thorough reviews of vehicle
qualification and revenue service test
data, and consideration of international
practices. The draft final rule was sent
to the task force for final consensus on
November 11, 2011, and was approved
by electronic vote on November 21,
2011. The draft final rule was then
approved by electronic vote by the
Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 12, 2011, and by the full
RSAC Committee by electronic vote on
January 6, 2012. Target publication date
of the final rule is June 2012. Contact:
John Mardente, (202) 493–1335.
General Passenger Safety Task Force.
At the Passenger Safety Working Group
meeting on April 17–18, 2007, the task
force presented a progress report to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
working group. The task force met on
July 18–19, 2007, and afterwards it
reported proposed reporting cause codes
for injuries involving the platform gap,
which were approved by the working
group by mail ballot in September 2007.
The full RSAC approved the
recommendations for changes to 49 CFR
Part 225 accident/incident cause codes
on October 25, 2007. The General
Passenger Safety Task Force presented
draft guidance material for management
of the gap that was considered and
approved by the working group during
the December 11–12, 2007, meeting and
was presented to and approved by full
RSAC vote during the February 20,
2008, meeting. The group met April 23–
24, 2008, December 3–4, 2008, April 21–
23, 2009, October 7–8, 2009, and July
30, 2010, by GoTo/Webinar
teleconference. The task force continues
work on passenger train door
securement, ‘‘second train in station’’,
trespasser incidents, and system safetybased solutions by developing a
regulatory approach to system safety.
The task force has created two task
groups to focus on these issues.
The Door Safety Task Group has
reached consensus on 47 out of 48
safety issues and had five items that
have been remanded to the task force for
vote. The issues are addressed in the
area of passenger train door mechanical
and operational requirements and
presented draft regulatory language to
the Passenger Safety Working Group at
the September 16, 2010, meeting. More
work remains to ensure the 49 CFR Part
238 door rule consensus document and
the proposed American Public Transit
Association (APTA) door standard
(APTA SS–M–18–10) uses uniform
language. The document was approved
by the Passenger Safety Working Group
by electronic vote on March 31, 2011,
and approved by the RSAC on May 20,
2011. This rulemaking would amend the
passenger equipment safety standards to
enhance safety standards as they relate
to passenger door securement while a
passenger train is in service based on
research and experiences of FRA safety
inspectors. Specifically, FRA would
incorporate by reference APTA
standard: ‘‘APTA SS–M–18–10
Standard for Powered Exterior Side
Door System Design for New Passenger
Cars.’’ A draft NPRM is currently under
development with a target publication
date of May 2012. No additional Door
Task Group meetings are currently
scheduled. Contact: Brian Hontz, (610)
521–8220.
The System Safety Task Group has
produced draft regulatory language for a
System Safety Rule, but work on this
rulemaking was delayed until a study of
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24259
legal protections for Risk Reduction
Program (RRP) and System Safety
Program (SSP) risk analysis data that is
required by the Rail Safety Improvement
Act of 2008 (RSIA) was completed. The
System Safety rulemaking would
improve passenger railroad safety
through structured, proactive processes
and procedures developed by passenger
railroad operators. It would require
passenger railroads to establish an SSP
that would systematically evaluate and
manage risks in order to reduce the
number and rates of railroad accidents,
incidents, injuries, and fatalities. FRA
continued to work on a draft NPRM
while waiting for the legal review of
protection of hazard analysis
information, required by Section 109 of
the RSIA. RCC completed a legal study
and posted it on the FRA Web site and
in the docket. The General Passenger
Safety Task Force including the
members of the System Safety Task
Group met on February 1–2, 2012, and
continued work on finalizing the draft
NPRM language. A draft NPRM is being
prepared with a target date of August
2012 for publication. No additional
System Safety Task Group meetings are
currently scheduled. Contact: Dan
Knote, (631) 567–1596.
Task 05–01—Review of Roadway
Worker Protection Issues. This task was
accepted on January 26, 2005, to review
49 CFR Part 214, Subpart C, Roadway
Worker Protection (RWP), and related
sections of Subpart A; to recommend
consideration of specific actions to
advance the on-track safety of railroad
employees and contractors engaged in
maintenance-of-way activities
throughout the general system of
railroad transportation, including
clarification of existing requirements. A
working group was established and
reported to the RSAC any specific
actions identified as appropriate. The
first meeting of the working group was
held on April 12–14, 2005. Over the
course of 2 years, the group drafted and
reached consensus on regulatory
language for various revisions,
clarifications, and additions to 32
separate items in 19 sections of the rule.
However, two parties raised technical
concerns regarding one of those items,
namely, the draft language concerning
electronic display of track authorities.
The working group presented and
received approval on all of its consensus
recommendations for draft rule text to
the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
meeting. FRA will address the
electronic display of track authorities
issue, along with eight additional items
that the working group was unable to
reach consensus, through the traditional
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24260
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
NPRM process. In early 2008, the
external working group members were
solicited to review the consensus rule
text for errata review. In order to
address the heightened concerns raised
with the current regulations for
adjacent-track, on-track safety, FRA
decided to issue, on an accelerated
basis, a separate NPRM that would focus
on this element of the RWP rule alone.
An NPRM with an abbreviated comment
period regarding adjacent-track, on-track
safety was published on July 17, 2008,
but was later withdrawn on August 13,
2008, to permit further consideration of
the RSAC consensus language. A second
NPRM concerning adjacent-controlledtrack, on-track safety was published on
November 25, 2009, and comments were
due to the docket by January 25, 2010.
Comments were reviewed and
considered by FRA, and the final rule
was published on November 30, 2011
(76 FR 74586). In response to the final
rule, FRA received two petitions for
reconsideration that raise a number of
substantive issues requiring a detailed
response. A delay of the effective date
of the final rule and a request for
comments was published on March 8,
2012 (77 FR 13978). This document
delays the effective date of the final rule
until July 1, 201,3 and establishes a 60day comment period in order to permit
interested parties an opportunity to
respond to the submitted petitions for
reconsideration.
The remaining larger NPRM relating
to the various revisions, clarifications,
and additions to 31 separate items in 19
sections of the rule, and FRA’s
recommendations for 9 nonconsensus
items is now planned for early 2012.
Contact: Joe Riley, (202) 493–6357.
Task 05–02—Reduce Human FactorCaused Train Accident/Incidents. This
task was accepted on May 18, 2005, to
reduce the number of human factorcaused train accidents/incidents and
related employee injuries. The Railroad
Operating Rules Working Group was
formed, and the working group
extensively reviewed the issues
presented. The final working group
meeting devoted to developing a
proposed rule was held February 8–9,
2006. The working group was not able
to deliver a consensus regulatory
proposal, but it did recommend that it
be used to review comments on FRA’s
NPRM, which was published in the
Federal Register on October 12, 2006
(FR 71 60372), with public comments
due by December 11, 2006. Two reviews
were held, one on February 8–9, 2007,
and one on April 4–5, 2007. Consensus
was reached on four items and those
items were presented and accepted by
the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
meeting. A final rule was published in
the Federal Register on February 13,
2008 (73 FR 8442), with an effective
date of April 14, 2008. FRA received
four petitions for reconsideration of that
final rule. The final rule that responded
to the petitions for consideration was
published in the Federal Register on
June 16, 2008, and concluded the
rulemaking. Working group meetings
were held September 27–28, 2007;
January 17–18, 2008; May 21–22, 2008;
and September 25–26, 2008. The
working group has considered issues
related to issuance of Emergency Order
No. 26 (prohibition on use of certain
electronic devices while on duty), and
‘‘after arrival mandatory directives,’’
among other issues. The working group
continues to work on after arrival
orders, and at the September 25–26,
2008, meeting voted to create a
Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Task
Force to review highway-rail grade
crossing accident reports regarding
incidents of grade crossing warning
systems providing ‘‘short or no
warning’’ resulting from or contributed
to ‘‘by train operational issues’’ with the
intent to recommend new accident/
incident reporting codes that would
better explain such events, and which
may provide information for remedial
action going forward. A followup task is
to review and provide recommendations
regarding supplementary reporting of
train operations-related, no-warning or
short-warning incidents that are not
technically warning system activation
failures, but that result in an accident/
incident or a near miss. The task force
has been formed and will begin work
after other RSIA priorities are met.
Contact: Douglas Taylor, (202) 493–
6255.
Task 06–01—Locomotive Safety
Standards. This task was accepted on
February 22, 2006, to review 49 CFR
Part 229, Railroad Locomotive Safety
Standards, and revise as appropriate. A
working group was established with the
mandate to report any planned activity
to the full Committee at each scheduled
full RSAC meeting, to include
milestones for completion of projects
and progress toward completion. The
first working group meeting was held
May 8–10, 2006. Working group
meetings were held on August 8–9,
2006; September 25–26, 2006; October
30–31, 2006; and the working group
presented recommendations regarding
revisions to requirements for locomotive
sanders to the full RSAC on September
21, 2006. The NPRM regarding sanders
was published in the Federal Register
on March 6, 2007 (72 FR 9904).
Comments received were discussed by
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the working group for clarification, and
FRA published a final rule on October
19, 2007 (72 FR 59216). The working
group met on January 9–10, 2007;
November 27–28, 2007; February 5–6,
2008; May 20–21, 2008; August 5–6,
2008; October 22–23, 2008; January 6–
7, 2009; and April 15–16, 2009. The
working group has now completed the
review of 49 CFR Part 229 and was
unable to reach consensus regarding
locomotive cab temperatures standards,
locomotive alerters, and remote control
locomotives. The group reached
consensus regarding critical locomotive
electronic standards, updated annual/
biennial air brake standards,
clarification of the ‘‘air brakes operate as
intended’’ requirement, locomotive pilot
clearance within hump classification
yards, clarification of the ‘‘high voltage’’
warning requirement, an update of
‘‘headlight lamp’’ requirements, and
language to allow locomotive records to
be stored electronically. The working
group presented a draft 49 CFR Part 229
rule text revision covering these items to
the RSAC for consideration at the
September 10, 2009, meeting and
received approval. The NPRM was
delayed due to competing RSIA
priorities and the need for additional
language. The NPRM was published on
January 12, 2011 (76 FR 2200), and the
final rule is scheduled to be published
in early 2012. This rulemaking would
amend the rules pertaining to the
Locomotive Safety Standards. The
proposed amendments would update,
consolidate, and clarify existing rules,
and adopt existing industry and
engineering best practices. The
proposed amendments include:
updating locomotive inspection
recordkeeping requirements by
permitting electronic records;
consolidating locomotive air brake
maintenance into a single provision;
clarifying locomotive headlight
requirements to address new
technology; and, establishing
locomotive electronics standards based
on existing industry and engineering
best practices, as well as other existing
Federal electronics standards. This
action is taken by FRA in an effort to
improve its safety regulator program.
The working group may be called back
to address comments received on the
final rule after publication. Contact:
Steve Clay, (202) 493–6259.
Task 06–03—Medical Standards for
Safety-Critical Personnel. This task was
accepted on September 21, 2006, to
enhance the safety of persons in the
railroad operating environment and the
public by establishing standards and
procedures for determining the medical
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
fitness for duty of personnel engaged in
safety-critical functions. A working
group was established by the full RSAC
and reports its activities and progress
toward completion of this task to the
full RSAC during each meeting of the
full RSAC. The first working group
meeting was held December 12–13,
2006, and the working group has held
follow-on meetings on February 20–21,
2007; July 24–25, 2007; August 29–30,
2007; October 31–November 1, 2007;
December 4–5, 2007; February 13–14,
2008; March 26–27, 2008; April 22–23,
2008; December 8–9, 2009; February 16–
17, 2010; March 11–12, 2010; May 24–
26, 2010; August 31–September 1, 2010;
November 18–19, 2010; and September
27–28, 2011. During the working
group’s September 2011 meeting, the
working group discussed stakeholder
positions on the draft rule text and draft
medical qualification criteria and
protocols, and a preliminary cost-benefit
analysis was presented to the working
group by the FRA economist. The
working group tentatively agreed to
proceed to revise its draft
recommendations to include a proposed
option that the medical qualification
criteria be issued as medical
qualification guidelines rather than
standards. The working group
established a task force to draft
proposed revisions to working draft
documents to be presented to the
working group for review and comment.
The next working group meeting has not
currently been scheduled due to other
priority RSIA projects. Contact: Dr.
Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Physicians Task Force. A Physicians
Task Force was established by the
working group in May 2007, and tasked
to draft recommended medical
qualification criteria and protocols for
locomotive engineers and conductors.
The Physicians Task Force has had
meetings or conference calls on July 24,
2007; August 20, 2007; October 15,
2007; October 31, 2007; June 23–24,
2008; September 8–10, 2008; October 8,
2008; November 12–13, 2008; December
8–10, 2008; January 27–28, 2009;
February 24–25, 2009; March 11–12,
2009; March 31–April 1, 2009; April 15,
2009; April 22, 2009; May 13, 2009; May
20, 2009; June 17, 2009; January 21–22,
2010; March 3, 2010; August 16–17,
2010; and October 25–26, 2010;
December 17, 2010; January 11, 2011;
March 3–4, 2011; May 16–17, 2011;
August 18, 2011; August 25, 2011;
August 31, 2011. On September 1, 2011,
the task force notified working group
members that it had made significant
progress in completing its task and
requested that the working group
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
participate in clarifying a limited
number of remaining operational issues
relevant to the task that merited review
by industry management, labor, and
other stakeholders. No further meetings
of the Physicians Task Force are
currently scheduled. Contact: Dr.
Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Critical Incident Task Force. The
Medical Standards Working Group
accepted RSAC Task 2009–02, Critical
Incident Response, during the December
8–9, 2010, meeting. The working group
has been tasked to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for critical incident stress
plans as required by the RSIA. A Critical
Incident Task Force was established by
the working group during the May 24–
26, 2010, Medical Standards Working
Group meeting. The scheduled kickoff
meeting for the Critical Incident Task
Force scheduled for September 2, 2010,
was postponed at the request of industry
participants. In late March 2011, FRA
leadership decided to request that the
RSAC be asked to amend the Critical
Incident task statement to remove
reference to the Medical Standards
Working Group and to allow the group
to assume full working group status to
expedite the work. The Committee
approved the revised task statement
with a target date for recommendations
to the Committee of December 2011, and
the task force transitioned to the Critical
Incident Working Group. (See Critical
Incident Working Group entry.) Contact:
Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Task 08–03—Track Safety Standards
Rail Integrity. This task was accepted on
September 10, 2008, to consider specific
improvements to the Track Safety
Standards or other responsive actions
designed to enhance rail integrity. The
Rail Integrity Task Force was created in
October 2007 under Task 07–01 and
first met on November 28–29, 2007. The
task force met on February 12–13, 2008;
April 15–16, 2008; July 8–9, 2008;
September 16–17, 2008; February 3–4,
2009; June 16–17, 2009; October 29–30,
2009; January 20–21, 2010; March 9–11,
2010; and April 20, 2010. Consensus has
been achieved on bond wires and a
common understanding on internal rail
flaw inspections has been reached. The
task force has reached consensus to
recommend to the working group that
the item regarding ‘‘the effect of rail
head wear, surface conditions and other
relevant factors on the acquisition and
interpretation of internal rail flaw test
results’’ be closed. The task force does
not recommend regulatory action
concerning head wear. Surface
conditions and their affect on test
integrity has been discussed and
understood during dialogue concerning
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24261
common understanding on internal rail
flaw inspections. The task force believes
that new technology has been developed
that improves test performance and will
impact the affect of head wear and
surface conditions on interpretation of
internal rail flaw test results. Consensus
text was developed on recommended
changes that would approach a
performance-based approach to flaw
detection scheduling. However, the
group did not reach consensus on what
length of segment of track is practical to
use on determining test cycles.
Consensus text has been finalized for
recommended changes to 49 CFR
213.113, Defective rails; 213.237, Rail
inspection; and 213.241, Inspection
records. The task force has developed a
new 49 CFR 213.238, Qualified operator
language, that defines the minimum
requirements for the training of a rail
flaw detector car operator. The task
force presented the consensus language
to the Track Standards Working Group
during the July 28–30, 2010, meeting
and the Track Standards Working Group
presented its consensus
recommendations to the RSAC for
approval during the September 23,
2010, Committee meeting. By majority
vote, the RSAC accepted the
recommendations of the Track
Standards Working Group and
forwarded those recommendations to
the Administrator completing RSAC
Task 08–03. The associated NPRM is
currently in the final stages of
development with an anticipated spring
issue date, and RSAC Task 08–03 will
be complete once the final rule is
issued. Contact: Carlo Patrick, (202)
493–6399.
Task No. 08–07—Conductor
Certification. This task was accepted on
December 10, 2008, to develop
regulations for certification of railroad
conductors, as required by the RSIA,
and to consider any appropriate related
amendments to existing regulations and
report recommendations for proposed or
interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with the Office of
the Secretary of Transportation (OST)
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB)) by October 16, 2009. The
Conductor Certification Working Group
was officially formed by nominations
from member organizations in April
2009, and the first meeting was held on
July 21–23, 2009. Additional meetings
were held on August 25–27, 2009;
September 15–17, 2009; October 20–22,
2009; November 17–19, 2009; and
December 16–18, 2009. Tentative
consensus was reached on the vast
majority of the regulatory text. The
working group approved the draft rule
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24262
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
text by electronic ballot and the
consensus draft language was approved
by the RSAC on March 18, 2010, by
unanimous vote as the recommendation
from the Committee to the FRA
Administrator. The resulting NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
November 10, 2010 (75 FR 69166), the
working group was called back to meet
and review comments received on May
12, 2011, and the final rule is currently
under development with a target
publication date of November 2012.
This rulemaking would provide rules
and guidance for requisite train
conductor certification to ensure that
individuals have the knowledge and
skills necessary to perform the duties of
a train conductor. This rulemaking may
propose that each railroad adopt and
comply with a written program for
certifying and recertifying the
qualifications of conductors. After the
final rule is published, the working
group will reconvene to make
conforming amendments to the
locomotive engineer certification
regulation as appropriate. Contact: Mark
McKeon, (202) 493–6350.
Task No. 09–02—Critical Incident
Programs. This task was accepted on
September 10, 2009, to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for Critical Incident Stress
Plans as required by the RSIA. The
group has been tasked to define what a
‘‘critical incident’’ is that requires a
response; review available data,
literature, and standards of practice
concerning critical incident programs to
determine appropriate action when a
railroad employee is involved in or
directly witnesses a critical incident;
review any evaluation studies available
for existing railroad critical incident
programs; describe program elements
appropriate for the rail environment,
including those requirements set forth
in the RSIA; provide an example of a
suitable plan (template); and assist in
the preparation of an NPRM no later
than December 2010. In late March
2011, FRA leadership requested that the
RSAC amend the Critical Incident task
statement to remove reference to the
Medical Standards Working Group and
to allow the group to assume full
working group status to expedite the
work. The Committee approved the
revised task statement with a target date
for recommendations to the Committee
of December 2011. The Critical Incident
Working Group kickoff meeting was
held on June 24, 2011. The draft report
assessing current knowledge of posttraumatic interventions and to advance
evidence-based recommendations for
controlling the risks associated with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
traumatic exposure in the railroad
setting was completed and distributed
to the working group prior to the
September 8–9, 2011, working group
meeting. Due to the aggressive timeline,
the working group held its second
meeting on October 11–12, 2011, and
held a follow-on meeting December 13,
2011. The grantee provided a report
entitled ‘‘Proposed Key Elements of
Critical Incident Intervention Program
for Reducing the Effects of Potentially
Traumatic Exposure on Train Crews to
Grade Crossing and Trespasser
Incidents’’ to the Critical Incident
Working Group on December 13, 2011.
A proposed rule based on the study
recommendations is currently under
development with the assistance of the
Critical Incident Working Group.
Contact: Ron Hynes, (202) 493–6404.
Task No. 10–01—Minimum Training
Standards and Plans. This task was
accepted on March 18, 2010, to establish
minimum training standards for each
class and craft of safety-related railroad
employee and their railroad contractor
and subcontractor equivalents, as
required by the RSIA. The group has
been tasked to assist FRA in developing
regulations responsive to the legislative
mandate, while ensuring that generally
accepted principles of adult learning are
employed in training and development
and delivery; determine a reasonable
method for submission and FRA review
of training plans, which takes human
resource limitations into account;
establish reasonable oversight criteria to
ensure training plans are effective, using
the operational tests and inspections
requirements of 49 CFR Part 217 as a
model. The Training Standards Working
Group was officially formed through the
formal Committee member nomination
process in March 2010, and the first
meeting was held on April 13–14, 2010.
A followup working group meeting was
held on June 2–3, 2010, and additional
followup meetings were held August
17–18 and September 21–22, 2010. A
Task Analysis Task Force was formed
under the working group to develop a
task analysis template and met in
Florence, KY, on June 22–23, 2010, with
CSX Transportation hosting the event.
The group developed a 21-page task
analysis document for an outbound
train yard carman position, which is
complete regarding FRA railroad safety
laws, regulations, and orders. The
working group met August 17–18, and
October 19–20, 2010, and by GoTo/
Webinar on November 15–16, 2010. The
working group reached consensus and
the resulting training standards draft
regulatory language was presented to
and approved by the RSAC Committee
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on December 14, 2010. This rulemaking
will (1) establish minimum training
standards for each class or craft of
safety-related employee and equivalent
railroad contractor and subcontractor
employee that require railroads,
contractors, and subcontractors to
qualify or otherwise document the
proficiency of such employees in each
such class and craft regarding their
knowledge and ability to comply with
Federal railroad safety laws and
regulations and railroad rules and
procedures intended to implement those
laws and regulations, etc.; (2) require
submission of railroads’, contractors’,
and subcontractors’ training and
qualification programs for FRA
approval; and (3) establish a minimum
training curriculum and ongoing
training criteria, testing, and skills
evaluation measures for track and
equipment inspectors employed by
railroads and railroad contractor and
subcontractors. The resulting NPRM
was published February 7, 2012 (77 FR
6411), with comments on the proposed
rule due by April 9, 2012. No additional
working group meetings are scheduled
at this time. Contact: Rob Castiglione,
(817) 447–2715.
Task No. 10–02—Safety Technology
in Dark Territory. This task was
accepted on September 23, 2010, to
provide advice regarding development
of standards, guidance, regulations, or
orders governing the development, use,
and implementation of rail safety
technology in dark territory, as required
by Section 406 of the RSIA. Specifically,
to assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate
and to report recommendations to the
FRA Administrator for proposed or
interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with the Office of
the Secretary of Transportation and the
Office of Management and Budget) by
September 30, 2011. This rulemaking
would issue standards or guidance
governing development and deployment
of technology to promote safe operation
in non-signaled territory in
arrangements not defined in signal
inspection law. The delay in starting
this effort was caused by the PTC
rulemaking, which required the same
key personnel both in government and
industry. With the PTC effort maturing,
resources became available and the Dark
Territory Working Group was formed to
assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate
and to report recommendations to the
FRA Administrator for proposed or
interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with OST and
OMB). The working group met on
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
March 3–4, 2011, May 9–10, 2011, and
September 6–7, 2011, and created four
task forces to investigate specific subject
areas. A follow-on meeting was held
November 17–18, 2011, and a proposed
rule is currently under development
with the assistance of the Dark Territory
Working Group. Contact: Olga Cataldi,
(202) 493–6321.
Task No. 11–01—Preventing Railroad
Employee Distractions Caused by
Personal Electronic Devices. This task
was accepted on May 20, 2011, to
prescribe mitigation strategies,
programs, and processes for governing
the use of personal electronic devices
that could cause distractions to railroad
employees engaged in safety-critical
activities. This working group will
explore additional methods to achieve
compliance through education, peer-topeer coaching, counseling, and other
cooperative, non-regulatory/punitive
methods. The Electronic Device
Distraction Working Group was formed
and held its kickoff meeting on October
25–26, 2011, and held follow-on
meetings on January 11–12, and March
27, 2012. Work on this task has
progressed well and the working group
is on target to present its
recommendations to the Committee
during the April 2012 RSAC meeting.
Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493–
6224.
Task No. 11–02—Track Inspection
Time Study. This task was accepted by
the Committee electronically on August
16, 2011, to consider specific
improvements to the Track Safety
Standards or other responsive actions
related to the Track Inspection Time
Study required by Sections 403(a)–(c) of
the RSIA and other relevant studies and
resources. Sections 403(a) and (b) of the
RSIA required a study of inspection
practices and the amount of time
required for inspections under the Track
Safety Standards, and another set of
revisions to those regulations. The
report was due by October 16, 2010, on
the results of a specified track
inspection time and track safety study.
FRA is expected to make
recommendations for rule changes and,
under Section 403(c), not later than 2
years after completion of the study,
prescribe regulations based on its
results. FRA organized an independent
study by an outside contractor and
developed a questionnaire used to get
information from railroad track
inspectors throughout the country;
interviews with railroad and union
officials were also conducted for
additional perspectives. The Track
Inspection Time Study was completed
and signed by the Secretary on May 2,
2011, starting the 2-year timeline for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
rulemaking. The task was given to the
Track Standards Working Group and it
held a kickoff meeting on October 20,
2011, and follow-on meetings were held
on December 20–21, 2011; and February
7–8, 2012. No further meetings are
currently scheduled and the working
group is on schedule to provide
recommendations to the Committee no
later than May 2, 2012. Contact: Michael
Lestingi, (202) 493–6236.
Task No. 11–03—Fatigue
Management Plans. This task was
accepted by the Committee on
December 8, 2011, to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for Fatigue Management
Plans and their deployment under the
RSIA. The working group was formed
and held its kick-off meeting on March
27, 2012. The working group is tasked
to report recommendations to the
Committee no later than February 2013.
Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493–
6224.
Task No. 11–04—Risk Reduction
Program. This task was accepted by the
Committee on December 8, 2011, to
develop requirements for certain
railroads to develop a Risk Reduction
Program as mandated by the RSIA. The
working group was formed and held its
kick-off meeting on January 31–
February 1, 2012, and a follow-on
meeting is scheduled for April 10–11,
2012. Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202)
493–6224.
Completed Tasks
Task 96–1—(Completed) Revising the
freight power brake regulations.
Task 96–2—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to the
Track Safety Standards (49 CFR Part
213).
Task 96–3—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to the
Radio Standards and Procedures (49
CFR Part 220).
Task 96–5—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to Steam
Locomotive Inspection Standards (49
CFR Part 230).
Task 96–6—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to
miscellaneous aspects of the regulations
addressing locomotive engineer
certification (49 CFR Part 240).
Task 96–7—(Completed) Developing
roadway maintenance machines (ontrack equipment) safety standards.
Task 96–8—(Completed) This
planning task evaluated the need for
action responsive to recommendations
contained in a report to Congress titled,
Locomotive Crashworthiness & Working
Conditions.
Task 97–1—(Completed) Developing
crashworthiness specifications (49 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24263
Part 229) to promote the integrity of the
locomotive cab in accidents resulting
from collisions.
Task 97–2—(Completed) Evaluating
the extent to which environmental,
sanitary, and other working conditions
in locomotive cabs affect the crew’s
health and the safe operation of
locomotives, proposing standards where
appropriate.
Task 97–3—(Completed) Developing
event recorder data survivability
standards.
Task 97–4 and Task 97–5—
(Completed) Defining PTC
functionalities, describing available
technologies, evaluating costs and
benefits of potential systems, and
considering implementation
opportunities and challenges, including
demonstration and deployment.
Task 97–6—(Completed) Revising
various regulations to address the safety
implications of processor-based signal
and train control technologies,
including communications-based
operating systems.
Task 97–7—(Completed) Determining
damages qualifying an event as a
reportable train accident.
Task 00–1—(Completed–task
withdrawn) Determining the need to
amend regulations protecting persons
who work on, under, or between rolling
equipment and persons applying,
removing, or inspecting rear end
marking devices (Blue Signal
Protection).
Task 01–1—(Completed) Developing
conformity of FRA’s regulations for
accident/incident reporting (49 CFR Part
225) to revised regulations of the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, and to make appropriate
revisions to the FRA Guide for
Preparing Accident/Incident Reports
(Reporting Guide).
Task 06–02—(Completed) Track
Safety Standards and CWR. Issue
requirements for inspection of joint bars
in CWR to detect cracks that could affect
the integrity of the track structure
published a final rule on August 25,
2009, with correcting amendment
published on October 21, 2009.
Task 07–01—(Completed) Track
Safety Standards. Consider specific
improvements to the Track Safety
Standards or other responsive actions,
supplementing work already underway
on continuous welded rail (CWR)
specifically to: Review controls applied
to the reuse of rail in CWR ‘‘plug rail’’;
review the issue of cracks emanating
from bond wire attachments; consider
improvements in the Track Safety
Standards related to fastening of rail to
concrete ties; and ensure a common
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24264
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices
understanding within the regulated
community concerning requirements for
internal rail flaw inspections. The
Concrete Crossties NPRM was published
on August 26, 2010 (75 FR 52490), and
the final rule was issued on April 1,
2011 (76 FR 18073), with an effective
date of July 1, 2011. FRA received two
petitions for reconsideration in response
to the final rule, and as a result
published a second final rule on June
15, 2011 (76 FR 34890), delaying the
effective date of the final rule until
October 1, 2011.
Task 08–01—(Completed) Report on
the Nation’s railroad bridges. Report to
FRA on the current state of railroad
bridge safety management; update the
findings and conclusions of the 1993
Summary Report of the FRA Railroad
Bridge Safety Survey.
Task No. 08–04—(Completed)
Positive Train Control. Provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for PTC systems and their
deployment under the RSIA. The PTC
consensus rule text was approved by
majority RSAC vote by electronic ballot
on September 24, 2009, and the final
rule was published on January 15, 2010
(75 FR 2598). Final rule amendments
were published on September 27, 2010
(75 FR 59108). An NPRM proposing
amendments to the PTC Final Rule that
would remove various regulatory
requirements that require railroads to
either conduct further analyses or meet
certain risk-based criteria in order to
avoid PTC system implementation on
track segments that do not transport
poison- or toxic-by-inhalation
hazardous materials traffic, and are not
used for intercity or commuter rail
passenger transportation, as of
December 31, 2015, was published on
August 24, 2011 (76 FR 52918), with
comments due by October 24, 2011.
Task No. 08–05—(Completed)
Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance.
Develop a rule encompassing the
requirements of Section 417 of the RSIA
(Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance), of
RSIA bridge failure. Final rule
published July 15, 2010 (75 FR–41282).
Task No. 08–06—(Completed) Hours
of Service Recordkeeping and
Reporting. Develop revised
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for hours of service of
railroad employees. Final rule
published May 27, 2009, with an
effective date of July 16, 2009. (74 FR
25330).
Task No. 09–01—(Completed)
Passenger Hours of Service. Provide
advice regarding development of
implementing regulations for the hours
of service of operating employees of
commuter and intercity passenger
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Apr 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
railroads under the RSIA. The NPRM
was published on March 22, 2011 (76
FR 16200), and the final rule was
published on August 12, 2011 (76 FR
50360), with an effective date of October
15, 2011.
Please refer to the notice published in
the Federal Register on March 11, 1996
(61 FR 9740), for more information
about the RSAC.
Robert C. Lauby,
Acting Associate Administrator for Railroad
Safety/Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–9625 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0040, Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming LeftHand Drive 2006 Land Rover Range
Rover Multi-Purpose Passenger
Vehicles Manufactured Prior to
September 1, 2006 Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that left-hand
drive (LHD) 2006 Land Rover Range
Rover multi-purpose passenger vehicles
(MPVs) manufactured prior to
September 1, 2006 for sale in the United
Kingdom and other foreign markets that
were not originally manufactured to
comply with all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS), are eligible for importation
into the United States because they are
substantially similar to vehicles that
were originally manufactured for sale in
the United States and that were certified
by their manufacturer as complying
with the safety standards (the U.S.certified version of the 2006 Land Rover
Range Rover MPV) and they are capable
of being readily altered to conform to
the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is May 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Stevens, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24257-24264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9625]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA-2000-7257; Notice No. 69]
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC); Working Group Activity
Update
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Announcement of Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
Working Group Activities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FRA is updating its announcement of the RSAC Working Group
activities to reflect its current status.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Woolverton, RSAC Designated
Federal Officer/Administrative Officer, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6212; or Robert
Lauby, Acting Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety
Officer, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mailstop 25, Washington, DC
20590, (202) 493-6474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice serves to update FRA's last
announcement of working group activities and status reports of November
28, 2011 (76 FR 72997). The 45th full RSAC meeting was held December 8,
2011, and the 46th meeting is scheduled for April 26, 2012, at the
National Association of Home Builders, National Housing Center, located
at 1201 15th Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Since its first meeting in April 1996, the RSAC has accepted 38
tasks. Status for each of the open tasks (neither completed nor
terminated) is provided below:
Open Tasks
Task 96-4-Tourist and Historic Railroads. Reviewing the
appropriateness of the agency's current policy regarding the
applicability of existing and proposed regulations to tourist,
excursion, scenic, and historic railroads. This task was accepted on
April 2, 1996, and a working group was established. The working group
monitored the steam locomotive regulation task. Planned future
activities involve the review of other regulations for possible
adaptation to the safety needs of tourist and historic railroads.
Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493-6474.
Task 03-01-Passenger Safety. This task includes updating and
enhancing the regulations pertaining to passenger safety, based on
research and experience. This task was accepted on May 20, 2003, and a
working group was established. Prior to embarking on substantive
discussions of a specific task, the working group set forth in writing
a specific description of the task. The working group reports planned
activity to the full RSAC at each scheduled full RSAC meeting,
including milestones for completion of projects and progress toward
completion. At the first meeting, held on September 9-10, 2003, a
consolidated list of issues was completed. At the second meeting, held
on November 6-7, 2003, four task groups were established: Emergency
Preparedness, Mechanical, Crashworthiness, and Track/Vehicle
Interaction. The task forces met and reported on activities for working
group consideration at the third meeting, held on May 11-12, 2004, and
a fourth meeting was held October 26-27, 2004. The working group met on
March 21-22, 2006, and again on September 12-13, 2006, at which time
the group agreed to establish a task force on General Passenger Safety.
The full Passenger Safety Working Group met on April 17-18, 2007;
December 11-12, 2007; November 13, 2008; and June 8, 2009. On August 5,
2009, the working group was requested to establish an Engineering Task
Force (ETF) to consider technical criteria and procedures for
qualifying alternative passenger equipment designs as equivalent in
safety to equipment meeting the design standards in the Passenger
Equipment Safety Standards. Consensus Tier III recommendations of the
ETF were developed and were approved at a meeting on October 6-7, 2011,
by the Passenger Safety Working Group, and these recommendations were
approved by the full RSAC Committee by electronic vote on March 2,
2012. These recommendations address safety issues related to high-speed
rail trainsets used in the United States. No additional meetings are
currently scheduled. Contact: Charles Bielitz, (202) 493-6314.
Engineering Task Force. The Passenger Safety Working Group approved
a request from FRA to establish an ETF under the Passenger Safety
Working Group in August 2009. The mission of the task force is to
produce a set of technical evaluation criteria and procedures for
passenger rail equipment built to alternative designs. The technical
evaluation criteria and procedures would provide a means of
establishing whether an alternative design would result in performance
at least equal to the structural design standards set forth in the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards (Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 238). The initial focus of this effort will be
on Tier I standards. When completed, the criteria and procedures would
form a technical basis for making determinations concerning equivalent
safety pursuant to 49 CFR 238.201, and provide a technical framework
for presenting evidence to FRA in support of any request for waiver of
the compressive (buff) strength requirement, as set forth in 49 CFR
238.203. See 49 CFR Part 211, Rules of Practice. The criteria and
procedures could be incorporated into Part 238 at a later date after
notice and opportunity for public comment. The ETF was formed and a
kickoff meeting was held on September 23-24, 2009. The group held
follow-on meetings November 3-4, 2009; January 7-8, 2010; and March 9-
10, 2010. A followup GoTo/Webinar meeting was held on July 12, 2010.
The ETF developed a draft ``Criteria and Procedures Report,'' that was
approved by the Passenger Safety
[[Page 24258]]
Working Group during the September 16, 2010, meeting and by the RSAC
Committee during the September 23, 2010, meeting. The document has been
placed on the FRA Web site at the following address: https://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/RSAC_REPORT-%209-16-10.pdf.
Engineering Task Force II. To build on the success of the ETF in
developing a set of alternative technical criteria and procedures for
evaluating the crashworthiness and occupant protection performance of
passenger rail equipment in service at conventional operating speeds,
FRA requested that the Passenger Safety Working Group re-task the group
to concentrate on developing crashworthiness and occupant protection
safety recommendations for high-speed passenger trains. The Passenger
Safety Working Group accepted the task on July 28, 2010, by electronic
vote. Under the new task, the task force may address any safety
features of the equipment, including but not limited to
crashworthiness, interior occupant protection, glazing, emergency
egress, and fire safety features. Any type of equipment may be
addressed, including conventional locomotives, high-speed power cars,
cab cars, multiple-unit (MU) locomotives, and coach cars. The equipment
addressed may be used in any type of passenger service, from
conventional-speed to high-speed. Recommendations may take the form of
criteria and procedures, revisions to existing regulations, or adoption
of new regulations, including rules of particular applicability. The
work of the re-tasked ETF is intended to assist FRA in developing
appropriate safety standards for the high-speed rail projects planned
in California and Nevada. The ETF II held a kickoff meeting on October
21-22, 2010, to begin work on the new high-speed task, and had follow-
on meetings on January 11-12, 2011, February 14-15, March 30-31, June
16-17, and October 6-7, 2011. Consensus Tier III recommendations of the
ETF were developed and were accepted by vote during the meeting on
October 6-7, 2011. The ETF II has formed two additional Task Groups to
work in the areas of track worthiness and brakes. The Track Worthiness
Task Group is tasked to identify potential safety issues related to
operation of high-speed trainsets on conventional track and to make
recommendations on how best to mitigate any consequences. The Task
Group includes experts and key stakeholders such as international
operators of high-speed equipment, car builders, wheel/rail interaction
dynamics specialists, and other RSAC working group members involved in
vehicle/track interaction. The Brakes Task Group is tasked to review
braking system requirements and international braking system
requirements versus existing U.S. requirements including inspection and
maintenance and identify common features, determine basic parameters,
and consider use of service proven braking systems. The Task Group will
also consider performance-based provisions/requirements with
consideration for operators to develop maintenance, inspection, and
service plans, and make recommendations regarding brakes to the ETF II
as related to Tier III. The next ETF meeting will be scheduled for June
2012. Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493-6474.
Emergency Preparedness Task Force. At the working group meeting on
March 9-10, 2005, the working group received and approved the consensus
report of the Emergency Preparedness Task Force related to emergency
communication, emergency egress, and rescue access. These
recommendations were presented to and approved by the full RSAC on May
18, 2005. The working group met on September 7-8, 2005, and additional,
supplementary recommendations were presented to and accepted by the
full RSAC on October 11, 2005. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
was published on August 24, 2006 (71 FR 50275), and was open for
comment until October 23, 2006. The working group agreed upon
recommendations for the final rule, including resolution of final
comments received, during the April 17-18, 2007, meeting. The
recommendations were presented to and approved by the full RSAC on June
26, 2007. The Passenger Train Emergency Systems final rule, focusing on
emergency communication, emergency egress, and rescue access, was
published on February 1, 2008 (73 FR 6370). The task force met on
October 17-18, 2007, and reached consensus on the draft rule text for a
followup NPRM on Passenger Train Emergency Systems, focusing on low
location emergency exit path marking, emergency lighting, and emergency
signage. The task force presented the draft rule text to the Passenger
Safety Working Group on December 11-12, 2007, and the consensus draft
rule text was presented to, and approved by full RSAC vote during the
February 20, 2008, meeting. During the May 13-14, 2008, meeting, the
task force recommended clarifying the applicability of back-up
emergency communication system requirements in the February 1, 2008,
final rule, and FRA announced its intention to exercise limited
enforcement discretion for a new provision amending instruction
requirements for emergency window exit removal. The working group
ratified these recommendations on June 19, 2008. The task force met
again on March 31, 2009, to clarify issues related to the followup NPRM
raised by members. The modified rule text was presented to and approved
by the Passenger Safety Working Group on June 8, 2009. The working
group requested that FRA draft the rule text requiring daily inspection
of removable panels or windows in vestibule doors and entrust the
Emergency Preparedness Task Force with reviewing the text. FRA sent the
draft text to the task force for review and comment on August 4, 2009.
The draft rule text was approved by the Passenger Safety Working Group
by mail ballot on December 23, 2009, and the resultant NPRM was
published January 3, 2012 (77 FR 154). No additional task force
meetings are currently scheduled. Contact: Brenda Moscoso, (202) 493-
6282.
Mechanical Task Force--Completed. Initial recommendations on
mechanical issues (revisions to 49 CFR Part 238) were approved by the
full RSAC on January 26, 2005. At the working group meeting on
September 7-8, 2005, the task force presented additional perfecting
amendments and the full RSAC approved them on October 11, 2005. An NPRM
was published in the Federal Register on December 8, 2005 (70 FR
73070). Public comments were due by February 17, 2006. The final rule
was published in the Federal Register on October 19, 2006 (71 FR
61835), effective December 18, 2006.
Crashworthiness Task Force--Completed. Among its efforts, the
Crashworthiness Task Force provided consensus recommendations on
static-end strength that were adopted by the working group on September
7-8, 2005. The full RSAC accepted the recommendations on October 11,
2005. The front-end strength of cab cars and MU locomotives' NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2007 (72 FR 42016), with
comments due by October 1, 2007. A number of comments were entered into
the docket, and a Crashworthiness Task Force meeting was held September
9, 2008, to resolve comments on the NPRM. Based on the consensus
language agreed to at the meeting, FRA has prepared the text of the
final rule incorporating the resolutions made at the task force meeting
and the final rule language was adopted at the Passenger Safety Working
Group meeting held on November 13, 2008. The language was presented and
[[Page 24259]]
approved at the December 10, 2008, full RSAC meeting. The final rule
was issued on December 31, 2009, and published on January 8, 2010 (75
FR 1180). Contact: Gary Fairbanks, (202) 493-6322.
Vehicle/Track Interaction Task Force. The task force is developing
proposed revisions to 49 CFR Parts 213 and 238, principally regarding
high-speed passenger service. The task force met on October 9-11, 2007,
and again on November 19-20, 2007, in Washington, DC, and presented the
final task force report and final recommendations and proposed rule
text for approval by the Passenger Safety Working Group at the December
11-12, 2007, meeting. The final report and the proposed rule text were
approved by the working group and were presented to and approved by
full RSAC vote during the February 20, 2008, meeting. The group met on
February 27-28, 2008, and by teleconference on March 18, 2010, to
address unresolved issues, and the NPRM was published on May 10, 2010
(75 FR 25928). The task force was called back into session on August 5-
6, 2010, to review and consider NPRM comments. The final rule will
amend the Track Safety Standards and Passenger Equipment Safety
Standards for high-speed train operations and train operations at high
cant deficiencies to promote the safe interaction of rail vehicles with
the track over which they operate. It will revise both the safety
limits for these operations and the process to qualify them. It
accounts for a range of vehicle types that are currently used and may
likely be used on future high-speed or high cant deficiency rail
operations, and would provide safety assurance for train operations in
all classes of track. It is based on the results of simulation studies
designed to identify track geometry irregularities associated with
unsafe wheel forces and acceleration, thorough reviews of vehicle
qualification and revenue service test data, and consideration of
international practices. The draft final rule was sent to the task
force for final consensus on November 11, 2011, and was approved by
electronic vote on November 21, 2011. The draft final rule was then
approved by electronic vote by the Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 12, 2011, and by the full RSAC Committee by electronic vote on
January 6, 2012. Target publication date of the final rule is June
2012. Contact: John Mardente, (202) 493-1335.
General Passenger Safety Task Force. At the Passenger Safety
Working Group meeting on April 17-18, 2007, the task force presented a
progress report to the working group. The task force met on July 18-19,
2007, and afterwards it reported proposed reporting cause codes for
injuries involving the platform gap, which were approved by the working
group by mail ballot in September 2007. The full RSAC approved the
recommendations for changes to 49 CFR Part 225 accident/incident cause
codes on October 25, 2007. The General Passenger Safety Task Force
presented draft guidance material for management of the gap that was
considered and approved by the working group during the December 11-12,
2007, meeting and was presented to and approved by full RSAC vote
during the February 20, 2008, meeting. The group met April 23-24, 2008,
December 3-4, 2008, April 21-23, 2009, October 7-8, 2009, and July 30,
2010, by GoTo/Webinar teleconference. The task force continues work on
passenger train door securement, ``second train in station'',
trespasser incidents, and system safety-based solutions by developing a
regulatory approach to system safety. The task force has created two
task groups to focus on these issues.
The Door Safety Task Group has reached consensus on 47 out of 48
safety issues and had five items that have been remanded to the task
force for vote. The issues are addressed in the area of passenger train
door mechanical and operational requirements and presented draft
regulatory language to the Passenger Safety Working Group at the
September 16, 2010, meeting. More work remains to ensure the 49 CFR
Part 238 door rule consensus document and the proposed American Public
Transit Association (APTA) door standard (APTA SS-M-18-10) uses uniform
language. The document was approved by the Passenger Safety Working
Group by electronic vote on March 31, 2011, and approved by the RSAC on
May 20, 2011. This rulemaking would amend the passenger equipment
safety standards to enhance safety standards as they relate to
passenger door securement while a passenger train is in service based
on research and experiences of FRA safety inspectors. Specifically, FRA
would incorporate by reference APTA standard: ``APTA SS-M-18-10
Standard for Powered Exterior Side Door System Design for New Passenger
Cars.'' A draft NPRM is currently under development with a target
publication date of May 2012. No additional Door Task Group meetings
are currently scheduled. Contact: Brian Hontz, (610) 521-8220.
The System Safety Task Group has produced draft regulatory language
for a System Safety Rule, but work on this rulemaking was delayed until
a study of legal protections for Risk Reduction Program (RRP) and
System Safety Program (SSP) risk analysis data that is required by the
Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA) was completed. The System
Safety rulemaking would improve passenger railroad safety through
structured, proactive processes and procedures developed by passenger
railroad operators. It would require passenger railroads to establish
an SSP that would systematically evaluate and manage risks in order to
reduce the number and rates of railroad accidents, incidents, injuries,
and fatalities. FRA continued to work on a draft NPRM while waiting for
the legal review of protection of hazard analysis information, required
by Section 109 of the RSIA. RCC completed a legal study and posted it
on the FRA Web site and in the docket. The General Passenger Safety
Task Force including the members of the System Safety Task Group met on
February 1-2, 2012, and continued work on finalizing the draft NPRM
language. A draft NPRM is being prepared with a target date of August
2012 for publication. No additional System Safety Task Group meetings
are currently scheduled. Contact: Dan Knote, (631) 567-1596.
Task 05-01--Review of Roadway Worker Protection Issues. This task
was accepted on January 26, 2005, to review 49 CFR Part 214, Subpart C,
Roadway Worker Protection (RWP), and related sections of Subpart A; to
recommend consideration of specific actions to advance the on-track
safety of railroad employees and contractors engaged in maintenance-of-
way activities throughout the general system of railroad
transportation, including clarification of existing requirements. A
working group was established and reported to the RSAC any specific
actions identified as appropriate. The first meeting of the working
group was held on April 12-14, 2005. Over the course of 2 years, the
group drafted and reached consensus on regulatory language for various
revisions, clarifications, and additions to 32 separate items in 19
sections of the rule. However, two parties raised technical concerns
regarding one of those items, namely, the draft language concerning
electronic display of track authorities. The working group presented
and received approval on all of its consensus recommendations for draft
rule text to the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007, meeting. FRA will
address the electronic display of track authorities issue, along with
eight additional items that the working group was unable to reach
consensus, through the traditional
[[Page 24260]]
NPRM process. In early 2008, the external working group members were
solicited to review the consensus rule text for errata review. In order
to address the heightened concerns raised with the current regulations
for adjacent-track, on-track safety, FRA decided to issue, on an
accelerated basis, a separate NPRM that would focus on this element of
the RWP rule alone. An NPRM with an abbreviated comment period
regarding adjacent-track, on-track safety was published on July 17,
2008, but was later withdrawn on August 13, 2008, to permit further
consideration of the RSAC consensus language. A second NPRM concerning
adjacent-controlled-track, on-track safety was published on November
25, 2009, and comments were due to the docket by January 25, 2010.
Comments were reviewed and considered by FRA, and the final rule was
published on November 30, 2011 (76 FR 74586). In response to the final
rule, FRA received two petitions for reconsideration that raise a
number of substantive issues requiring a detailed response. A delay of
the effective date of the final rule and a request for comments was
published on March 8, 2012 (77 FR 13978). This document delays the
effective date of the final rule until July 1, 201,3 and establishes a
60-day comment period in order to permit interested parties an
opportunity to respond to the submitted petitions for reconsideration.
The remaining larger NPRM relating to the various revisions,
clarifications, and additions to 31 separate items in 19 sections of
the rule, and FRA's recommendations for 9 nonconsensus items is now
planned for early 2012. Contact: Joe Riley, (202) 493-6357.
Task 05-02--Reduce Human Factor-Caused Train Accident/Incidents.
This task was accepted on May 18, 2005, to reduce the number of human
factor-caused train accidents/incidents and related employee injuries.
The Railroad Operating Rules Working Group was formed, and the working
group extensively reviewed the issues presented. The final working
group meeting devoted to developing a proposed rule was held February
8-9, 2006. The working group was not able to deliver a consensus
regulatory proposal, but it did recommend that it be used to review
comments on FRA's NPRM, which was published in the Federal Register on
October 12, 2006 (FR 71 60372), with public comments due by December
11, 2006. Two reviews were held, one on February 8-9, 2007, and one on
April 4-5, 2007. Consensus was reached on four items and those items
were presented and accepted by the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
meeting. A final rule was published in the Federal Register on February
13, 2008 (73 FR 8442), with an effective date of April 14, 2008. FRA
received four petitions for reconsideration of that final rule. The
final rule that responded to the petitions for consideration was
published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2008, and concluded the
rulemaking. Working group meetings were held September 27-28, 2007;
January 17-18, 2008; May 21-22, 2008; and September 25-26, 2008. The
working group has considered issues related to issuance of Emergency
Order No. 26 (prohibition on use of certain electronic devices while on
duty), and ``after arrival mandatory directives,'' among other issues.
The working group continues to work on after arrival orders, and at the
September 25-26, 2008, meeting voted to create a Highway-Rail Grade
Crossing Task Force to review highway-rail grade crossing accident
reports regarding incidents of grade crossing warning systems providing
``short or no warning'' resulting from or contributed to ``by train
operational issues'' with the intent to recommend new accident/incident
reporting codes that would better explain such events, and which may
provide information for remedial action going forward. A followup task
is to review and provide recommendations regarding supplementary
reporting of train operations-related, no-warning or short-warning
incidents that are not technically warning system activation failures,
but that result in an accident/incident or a near miss. The task force
has been formed and will begin work after other RSIA priorities are
met. Contact: Douglas Taylor, (202) 493-6255.
Task 06-01--Locomotive Safety Standards. This task was accepted on
February 22, 2006, to review 49 CFR Part 229, Railroad Locomotive
Safety Standards, and revise as appropriate. A working group was
established with the mandate to report any planned activity to the full
Committee at each scheduled full RSAC meeting, to include milestones
for completion of projects and progress toward completion. The first
working group meeting was held May 8-10, 2006. Working group meetings
were held on August 8-9, 2006; September 25-26, 2006; October 30-31,
2006; and the working group presented recommendations regarding
revisions to requirements for locomotive sanders to the full RSAC on
September 21, 2006. The NPRM regarding sanders was published in the
Federal Register on March 6, 2007 (72 FR 9904). Comments received were
discussed by the working group for clarification, and FRA published a
final rule on October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59216). The working group met on
January 9-10, 2007; November 27-28, 2007; February 5-6, 2008; May 20-
21, 2008; August 5-6, 2008; October 22-23, 2008; January 6-7, 2009; and
April 15-16, 2009. The working group has now completed the review of 49
CFR Part 229 and was unable to reach consensus regarding locomotive cab
temperatures standards, locomotive alerters, and remote control
locomotives. The group reached consensus regarding critical locomotive
electronic standards, updated annual/biennial air brake standards,
clarification of the ``air brakes operate as intended'' requirement,
locomotive pilot clearance within hump classification yards,
clarification of the ``high voltage'' warning requirement, an update of
``headlight lamp'' requirements, and language to allow locomotive
records to be stored electronically. The working group presented a
draft 49 CFR Part 229 rule text revision covering these items to the
RSAC for consideration at the September 10, 2009, meeting and received
approval. The NPRM was delayed due to competing RSIA priorities and the
need for additional language. The NPRM was published on January 12,
2011 (76 FR 2200), and the final rule is scheduled to be published in
early 2012. This rulemaking would amend the rules pertaining to the
Locomotive Safety Standards. The proposed amendments would update,
consolidate, and clarify existing rules, and adopt existing industry
and engineering best practices. The proposed amendments include:
updating locomotive inspection recordkeeping requirements by permitting
electronic records; consolidating locomotive air brake maintenance into
a single provision; clarifying locomotive headlight requirements to
address new technology; and, establishing locomotive electronics
standards based on existing industry and engineering best practices, as
well as other existing Federal electronics standards. This action is
taken by FRA in an effort to improve its safety regulator program. The
working group may be called back to address comments received on the
final rule after publication. Contact: Steve Clay, (202) 493-6259.
Task 06-03--Medical Standards for Safety-Critical Personnel. This
task was accepted on September 21, 2006, to enhance the safety of
persons in the railroad operating environment and the public by
establishing standards and procedures for determining the medical
[[Page 24261]]
fitness for duty of personnel engaged in safety-critical functions. A
working group was established by the full RSAC and reports its
activities and progress toward completion of this task to the full RSAC
during each meeting of the full RSAC. The first working group meeting
was held December 12-13, 2006, and the working group has held follow-on
meetings on February 20-21, 2007; July 24-25, 2007; August 29-30, 2007;
October 31-November 1, 2007; December 4-5, 2007; February 13-14, 2008;
March 26-27, 2008; April 22-23, 2008; December 8-9, 2009; February 16-
17, 2010; March 11-12, 2010; May 24-26, 2010; August 31-September 1,
2010; November 18-19, 2010; and September 27-28, 2011. During the
working group's September 2011 meeting, the working group discussed
stakeholder positions on the draft rule text and draft medical
qualification criteria and protocols, and a preliminary cost-benefit
analysis was presented to the working group by the FRA economist. The
working group tentatively agreed to proceed to revise its draft
recommendations to include a proposed option that the medical
qualification criteria be issued as medical qualification guidelines
rather than standards. The working group established a task force to
draft proposed revisions to working draft documents to be presented to
the working group for review and comment. The next working group
meeting has not currently been scheduled due to other priority RSIA
projects. Contact: Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493-6002.
Physicians Task Force. A Physicians Task Force was established by
the working group in May 2007, and tasked to draft recommended medical
qualification criteria and protocols for locomotive engineers and
conductors. The Physicians Task Force has had meetings or conference
calls on July 24, 2007; August 20, 2007; October 15, 2007; October 31,
2007; June 23-24, 2008; September 8-10, 2008; October 8, 2008; November
12-13, 2008; December 8-10, 2008; January 27-28, 2009; February 24-25,
2009; March 11-12, 2009; March 31-April 1, 2009; April 15, 2009; April
22, 2009; May 13, 2009; May 20, 2009; June 17, 2009; January 21-22,
2010; March 3, 2010; August 16-17, 2010; and October 25-26, 2010;
December 17, 2010; January 11, 2011; March 3-4, 2011; May 16-17, 2011;
August 18, 2011; August 25, 2011; August 31, 2011. On September 1,
2011, the task force notified working group members that it had made
significant progress in completing its task and requested that the
working group participate in clarifying a limited number of remaining
operational issues relevant to the task that merited review by industry
management, labor, and other stakeholders. No further meetings of the
Physicians Task Force are currently scheduled. Contact: Dr. Bernard
Arseneau, (202) 493-6002.
Critical Incident Task Force. The Medical Standards Working Group
accepted RSAC Task 2009-02, Critical Incident Response, during the
December 8-9, 2010, meeting. The working group has been tasked to
provide advice regarding development of implementing regulations for
critical incident stress plans as required by the RSIA. A Critical
Incident Task Force was established by the working group during the May
24-26, 2010, Medical Standards Working Group meeting. The scheduled
kickoff meeting for the Critical Incident Task Force scheduled for
September 2, 2010, was postponed at the request of industry
participants. In late March 2011, FRA leadership decided to request
that the RSAC be asked to amend the Critical Incident task statement to
remove reference to the Medical Standards Working Group and to allow
the group to assume full working group status to expedite the work. The
Committee approved the revised task statement with a target date for
recommendations to the Committee of December 2011, and the task force
transitioned to the Critical Incident Working Group. (See Critical
Incident Working Group entry.) Contact: Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202)
493-6002.
Task 08-03--Track Safety Standards Rail Integrity. This task was
accepted on September 10, 2008, to consider specific improvements to
the Track Safety Standards or other responsive actions designed to
enhance rail integrity. The Rail Integrity Task Force was created in
October 2007 under Task 07-01 and first met on November 28-29, 2007.
The task force met on February 12-13, 2008; April 15-16, 2008; July 8-
9, 2008; September 16-17, 2008; February 3-4, 2009; June 16-17, 2009;
October 29-30, 2009; January 20-21, 2010; March 9-11, 2010; and April
20, 2010. Consensus has been achieved on bond wires and a common
understanding on internal rail flaw inspections has been reached. The
task force has reached consensus to recommend to the working group that
the item regarding ``the effect of rail head wear, surface conditions
and other relevant factors on the acquisition and interpretation of
internal rail flaw test results'' be closed. The task force does not
recommend regulatory action concerning head wear. Surface conditions
and their affect on test integrity has been discussed and understood
during dialogue concerning common understanding on internal rail flaw
inspections. The task force believes that new technology has been
developed that improves test performance and will impact the affect of
head wear and surface conditions on interpretation of internal rail
flaw test results. Consensus text was developed on recommended changes
that would approach a performance-based approach to flaw detection
scheduling. However, the group did not reach consensus on what length
of segment of track is practical to use on determining test cycles.
Consensus text has been finalized for recommended changes to 49 CFR
213.113, Defective rails; 213.237, Rail inspection; and 213.241,
Inspection records. The task force has developed a new 49 CFR 213.238,
Qualified operator language, that defines the minimum requirements for
the training of a rail flaw detector car operator. The task force
presented the consensus language to the Track Standards Working Group
during the July 28-30, 2010, meeting and the Track Standards Working
Group presented its consensus recommendations to the RSAC for approval
during the September 23, 2010, Committee meeting. By majority vote, the
RSAC accepted the recommendations of the Track Standards Working Group
and forwarded those recommendations to the Administrator completing
RSAC Task 08-03. The associated NPRM is currently in the final stages
of development with an anticipated spring issue date, and RSAC Task 08-
03 will be complete once the final rule is issued. Contact: Carlo
Patrick, (202) 493-6399.
Task No. 08-07--Conductor Certification. This task was accepted on
December 10, 2008, to develop regulations for certification of railroad
conductors, as required by the RSIA, and to consider any appropriate
related amendments to existing regulations and report recommendations
for proposed or interim final rule (as determined by FRA in
consultation with the Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST)
and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)) by October 16, 2009. The
Conductor Certification Working Group was officially formed by
nominations from member organizations in April 2009, and the first
meeting was held on July 21-23, 2009. Additional meetings were held on
August 25-27, 2009; September 15-17, 2009; October 20-22, 2009;
November 17-19, 2009; and December 16-18, 2009. Tentative consensus was
reached on the vast majority of the regulatory text. The working group
approved the draft rule
[[Page 24262]]
text by electronic ballot and the consensus draft language was approved
by the RSAC on March 18, 2010, by unanimous vote as the recommendation
from the Committee to the FRA Administrator. The resulting NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on November 10, 2010 (75 FR 69166),
the working group was called back to meet and review comments received
on May 12, 2011, and the final rule is currently under development with
a target publication date of November 2012. This rulemaking would
provide rules and guidance for requisite train conductor certification
to ensure that individuals have the knowledge and skills necessary to
perform the duties of a train conductor. This rulemaking may propose
that each railroad adopt and comply with a written program for
certifying and recertifying the qualifications of conductors. After the
final rule is published, the working group will reconvene to make
conforming amendments to the locomotive engineer certification
regulation as appropriate. Contact: Mark McKeon, (202) 493-6350.
Task No. 09-02--Critical Incident Programs. This task was accepted
on September 10, 2009, to provide advice regarding development of
implementing regulations for Critical Incident Stress Plans as required
by the RSIA. The group has been tasked to define what a ``critical
incident'' is that requires a response; review available data,
literature, and standards of practice concerning critical incident
programs to determine appropriate action when a railroad employee is
involved in or directly witnesses a critical incident; review any
evaluation studies available for existing railroad critical incident
programs; describe program elements appropriate for the rail
environment, including those requirements set forth in the RSIA;
provide an example of a suitable plan (template); and assist in the
preparation of an NPRM no later than December 2010. In late March 2011,
FRA leadership requested that the RSAC amend the Critical Incident task
statement to remove reference to the Medical Standards Working Group
and to allow the group to assume full working group status to expedite
the work. The Committee approved the revised task statement with a
target date for recommendations to the Committee of December 2011. The
Critical Incident Working Group kickoff meeting was held on June 24,
2011. The draft report assessing current knowledge of post-traumatic
interventions and to advance evidence-based recommendations for
controlling the risks associated with traumatic exposure in the
railroad setting was completed and distributed to the working group
prior to the September 8-9, 2011, working group meeting. Due to the
aggressive timeline, the working group held its second meeting on
October 11-12, 2011, and held a follow-on meeting December 13, 2011.
The grantee provided a report entitled ``Proposed Key Elements of
Critical Incident Intervention Program for Reducing the Effects of
Potentially Traumatic Exposure on Train Crews to Grade Crossing and
Trespasser Incidents'' to the Critical Incident Working Group on
December 13, 2011. A proposed rule based on the study recommendations
is currently under development with the assistance of the Critical
Incident Working Group. Contact: Ron Hynes, (202) 493-6404.
Task No. 10-01--Minimum Training Standards and Plans. This task was
accepted on March 18, 2010, to establish minimum training standards for
each class and craft of safety-related railroad employee and their
railroad contractor and subcontractor equivalents, as required by the
RSIA. The group has been tasked to assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate, while ensuring that generally
accepted principles of adult learning are employed in training and
development and delivery; determine a reasonable method for submission
and FRA review of training plans, which takes human resource
limitations into account; establish reasonable oversight criteria to
ensure training plans are effective, using the operational tests and
inspections requirements of 49 CFR Part 217 as a model. The Training
Standards Working Group was officially formed through the formal
Committee member nomination process in March 2010, and the first
meeting was held on April 13-14, 2010. A followup working group meeting
was held on June 2-3, 2010, and additional followup meetings were held
August 17-18 and September 21-22, 2010. A Task Analysis Task Force was
formed under the working group to develop a task analysis template and
met in Florence, KY, on June 22-23, 2010, with CSX Transportation
hosting the event. The group developed a 21-page task analysis document
for an outbound train yard carman position, which is complete regarding
FRA railroad safety laws, regulations, and orders. The working group
met August 17-18, and October 19-20, 2010, and by GoTo/Webinar on
November 15-16, 2010. The working group reached consensus and the
resulting training standards draft regulatory language was presented to
and approved by the RSAC Committee on December 14, 2010. This
rulemaking will (1) establish minimum training standards for each class
or craft of safety-related employee and equivalent railroad contractor
and subcontractor employee that require railroads, contractors, and
subcontractors to qualify or otherwise document the proficiency of such
employees in each such class and craft regarding their knowledge and
ability to comply with Federal railroad safety laws and regulations and
railroad rules and procedures intended to implement those laws and
regulations, etc.; (2) require submission of railroads', contractors',
and subcontractors' training and qualification programs for FRA
approval; and (3) establish a minimum training curriculum and ongoing
training criteria, testing, and skills evaluation measures for track
and equipment inspectors employed by railroads and railroad contractor
and subcontractors. The resulting NPRM was published February 7, 2012
(77 FR 6411), with comments on the proposed rule due by April 9, 2012.
No additional working group meetings are scheduled at this time.
Contact: Rob Castiglione, (817) 447-2715.
Task No. 10-02--Safety Technology in Dark Territory. This task was
accepted on September 23, 2010, to provide advice regarding development
of standards, guidance, regulations, or orders governing the
development, use, and implementation of rail safety technology in dark
territory, as required by Section 406 of the RSIA. Specifically, to
assist FRA in developing regulations responsive to the legislative
mandate and to report recommendations to the FRA Administrator for
proposed or interim final rule (as determined by FRA in consultation
with the Office of the Secretary of Transportation and the Office of
Management and Budget) by September 30, 2011. This rulemaking would
issue standards or guidance governing development and deployment of
technology to promote safe operation in non-signaled territory in
arrangements not defined in signal inspection law. The delay in
starting this effort was caused by the PTC rulemaking, which required
the same key personnel both in government and industry. With the PTC
effort maturing, resources became available and the Dark Territory
Working Group was formed to assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate and to report recommendations to
the FRA Administrator for proposed or interim final rule (as determined
by FRA in consultation with OST and OMB). The working group met on
[[Page 24263]]
March 3-4, 2011, May 9-10, 2011, and September 6-7, 2011, and created
four task forces to investigate specific subject areas. A follow-on
meeting was held November 17-18, 2011, and a proposed rule is currently
under development with the assistance of the Dark Territory Working
Group. Contact: Olga Cataldi, (202) 493-6321.
Task No. 11-01--Preventing Railroad Employee Distractions Caused by
Personal Electronic Devices. This task was accepted on May 20, 2011, to
prescribe mitigation strategies, programs, and processes for governing
the use of personal electronic devices that could cause distractions to
railroad employees engaged in safety-critical activities. This working
group will explore additional methods to achieve compliance through
education, peer-to-peer coaching, counseling, and other cooperative,
non-regulatory/punitive methods. The Electronic Device Distraction
Working Group was formed and held its kickoff meeting on October 25-26,
2011, and held follow-on meetings on January 11-12, and March 27, 2012.
Work on this task has progressed well and the working group is on
target to present its recommendations to the Committee during the April
2012 RSAC meeting. Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493-6224.
Task No. 11-02--Track Inspection Time Study. This task was accepted
by the Committee electronically on August 16, 2011, to consider
specific improvements to the Track Safety Standards or other responsive
actions related to the Track Inspection Time Study required by Sections
403(a)-(c) of the RSIA and other relevant studies and resources.
Sections 403(a) and (b) of the RSIA required a study of inspection
practices and the amount of time required for inspections under the
Track Safety Standards, and another set of revisions to those
regulations. The report was due by October 16, 2010, on the results of
a specified track inspection time and track safety study. FRA is
expected to make recommendations for rule changes and, under Section
403(c), not later than 2 years after completion of the study, prescribe
regulations based on its results. FRA organized an independent study by
an outside contractor and developed a questionnaire used to get
information from railroad track inspectors throughout the country;
interviews with railroad and union officials were also conducted for
additional perspectives. The Track Inspection Time Study was completed
and signed by the Secretary on May 2, 2011, starting the 2-year
timeline for rulemaking. The task was given to the Track Standards
Working Group and it held a kickoff meeting on October 20, 2011, and
follow-on meetings were held on December 20-21, 2011; and February 7-8,
2012. No further meetings are currently scheduled and the working group
is on schedule to provide recommendations to the Committee no later
than May 2, 2012. Contact: Michael Lestingi, (202) 493-6236.
Task No. 11-03--Fatigue Management Plans. This task was accepted by
the Committee on December 8, 2011, to provide advice regarding
development of implementing regulations for Fatigue Management Plans
and their deployment under the RSIA. The working group was formed and
held its kick-off meeting on March 27, 2012. The working group is
tasked to report recommendations to the Committee no later than
February 2013. Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493-6224.
Task No. 11-04--Risk Reduction Program. This task was accepted by
the Committee on December 8, 2011, to develop requirements for certain
railroads to develop a Risk Reduction Program as mandated by the RSIA.
The working group was formed and held its kick-off meeting on January
31-February 1, 2012, and a follow-on meeting is scheduled for April 10-
11, 2012. Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493-6224.
Completed Tasks
Task 96-1--(Completed) Revising the freight power brake
regulations.
Task 96-2--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to the
Track Safety Standards (49 CFR Part 213).
Task 96-3--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to the
Radio Standards and Procedures (49 CFR Part 220).
Task 96-5--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to
Steam Locomotive Inspection Standards (49 CFR Part 230).
Task 96-6--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to
miscellaneous aspects of the regulations addressing locomotive engineer
certification (49 CFR Part 240).
Task 96-7--(Completed) Developing roadway maintenance machines (on-
track equipment) safety standards.
Task 96-8--(Completed) This planning task evaluated the need for
action responsive to recommendations contained in a report to Congress
titled, Locomotive Crashworthiness & Working Conditions.
Task 97-1--(Completed) Developing crashworthiness specifications
(49 CFR Part 229) to promote the integrity of the locomotive cab in
accidents resulting from collisions.
Task 97-2--(Completed) Evaluating the extent to which
environmental, sanitary, and other working conditions in locomotive
cabs affect the crew's health and the safe operation of locomotives,
proposing standards where appropriate.
Task 97-3--(Completed) Developing event recorder data survivability
standards.
Task 97-4 and Task 97-5--(Completed) Defining PTC functionalities,
describing available technologies, evaluating costs and benefits of
potential systems, and considering implementation opportunities and
challenges, including demonstration and deployment.
Task 97-6--(Completed) Revising various regulations to address the
safety implications of processor-based signal and train control
technologies, including communications-based operating systems.
Task 97-7--(Completed) Determining damages qualifying an event as a
reportable train accident.
Task 00-1--(Completed-task withdrawn) Determining the need to amend
regulations protecting persons who work on, under, or between rolling
equipment and persons applying, removing, or inspecting rear end
marking devices (Blue Signal Protection).
Task 01-1--(Completed) Developing conformity of FRA's regulations
for accident/incident reporting (49 CFR Part 225) to revised
regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, and to make appropriate revisions to the FRA Guide
for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports (Reporting Guide).
Task 06-02--(Completed) Track Safety Standards and CWR. Issue
requirements for inspection of joint bars in CWR to detect cracks that
could affect the integrity of the track structure published a final
rule on August 25, 2009, with correcting amendment published on October
21, 2009.
Task 07-01--(Completed) Track Safety Standards. Consider specific
improvements to the Track Safety Standards or other responsive actions,
supplementing work already underway on continuous welded rail (CWR)
specifically to: Review controls applied to the reuse of rail in CWR
``plug rail''; review the issue of cracks emanating from bond wire
attachments; consider improvements in the Track Safety Standards
related to fastening of rail to concrete ties; and ensure a common
[[Page 24264]]
understanding within the regulated community concerning requirements
for internal rail flaw inspections. The Concrete Crossties NPRM was
published on August 26, 2010 (75 FR 52490), and the final rule was
issued on April 1, 2011 (76 FR 18073), with an effective date of July
1, 2011. FRA received two petitions for reconsideration in response to
the final rule, and as a result published a second final rule on June
15, 2011 (76 FR 34890), delaying the effective date of the final rule
until October 1, 2011.
Task 08-01--(Completed) Report on the Nation's railroad bridges.
Report to FRA on the current state of railroad bridge safety
management; update the findings and conclusions of the 1993 Summary
Report of the FRA Railroad Bridge Safety Survey.
Task No. 08-04--(Completed) Positive Train Control. Provide advice
regarding development of implementing regulations for PTC systems and
their deployment under the RSIA. The PTC consensus rule text was
approved by majority RSAC vote by electronic ballot on September 24,
2009, and the final rule was published on January 15, 2010 (75 FR
2598). Final rule amendments were published on September 27, 2010 (75
FR 59108). An NPRM proposing amendments to the PTC Final Rule that
would remove various regulatory requirements that require railroads to
either conduct further analyses or meet certain risk-based criteria in
order to avoid PTC system implementation on track segments that do not
transport poison- or toxic-by-inhalation hazardous materials traffic,
and are not used for intercity or commuter rail passenger
transportation, as of December 31, 2015, was published on August 24,
2011 (76 FR 52918), with comments due by October 24, 2011.
Task No. 08-05--(Completed) Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance.
Develop a rule encompassing the requirements of Section 417 of the RSIA
(Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance), of RSIA bridge failure. Final rule
published July 15, 2010 (75 FR-41282).
Task No. 08-06--(Completed) Hours of Service Recordkeeping and
Reporting. Develop revised recordkeeping and reporting requirements for
hours of service of railroad employees. Final rule published May 27,
2009, with an effective date of July 16, 2009. (74 FR 25330).
Task No. 09-01--(Completed) Passenger Hours of Service. Provide
advice regarding development of implementing regulations for the hours
of service of operating employees of commuter and intercity passenger
railroads under the RSIA. The NPRM was published on March 22, 2011 (76
FR 16200), and the final rule was published on August 12, 2011 (76 FR
50360), with an effective date of October 15, 2011.
Please refer to the notice published in the Federal Register on
March 11, 1996 (61 FR 9740), for more information about the RSAC.
Robert C. Lauby,
Acting Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-9625 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P