Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration Project, Sonoma County, CA; Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement, 23740-23741 [2012-9577]
Download as PDF
23740
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices
year immediately following the first
phase application year.
Findings and Certifications
Environmental Impact
In accordance with 40 CFR 1508.4 of
the regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality and 24 CFR
50.19(c)(6) of HUD’s regulations, the
policies and procedures contained in
this notice provide for the establishment
of fiscal requirements or procedures that
do not constitute a development
decision affecting the physical
condition of specific project areas or
building sites and, therefore, are
categorically excluded from the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act, except for
extraordinary circumstances, and no
Finding of No Significant Impact is
required.
Federalism Impact
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any policy document that
has federalism implications if the
document either imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on state and
local governments and is not required
by statute, or the document preempts
state law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the executive order. This
notice merely designates DDAs as
required under Section 42 of the IRC, as
amended, for the use by political
subdivisions of the states in allocating
the LIHTC. This notice also details the
technical methodology used in making
such designations. As a result, this
notice is not subject to review under the
order.
Dated: April 13, 2012.
Raphael W. Bostic,
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development
and Research.
[FR Doc. 2012–9630 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
stakeholders from across the nation, the
purpose of the Advisory Committee is to
provide advice to the National Invasive
Species Council, as authorized by
Executive Order 13112, on a broad array
of issues related to preventing the
introduction of invasive species and
providing for their control and
minimizing the economic, ecological,
and human health impacts that invasive
species cause. The Council is co-chaired
by the Secretary of the Interior, the
Secretary of Agriculture, and the
Secretary of Commerce. The duty of the
Council is to provide national
leadership regarding invasive species
issues.
Purpose of Meeting: The meeting will
be held on May 22–24, 2012 in Portland,
Oregon, and will focus primarily on
invasive species in the Pacific
Northwest. A ‘‘systems thinking’’
approach to this meeting in both
ecological and management contexts,
will center on topics that: (1) Pertain to
invasive species issues at the
community and ecosystem level; or that,
(2) holistically address prevention,
eradication, control and restoration
activities within the region. A copy of
the meeting agenda is available on the
NISC Web site,
www.invasivespecies.gov.
Meeting of the Invasive Species
Advisory Committee: Tuesday, May 22,
2012 and Thursday, May 24, 2012;
beginning at approximately 8 a.m., and
ending at approximately 5 p.m. each
day. Members will be participating in an
off-site field tour on Wednesday, May
23, 2012. The field tour is closed to the
public.
DATES:
The Benson Hotel, 309 SW
Broadway, Portland, Oregon 97205. The
general session on May 22, 2012 and
May 24, 2012 will be held in the Crystal
Ballroom.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelsey Brantley, National Invasive
Species Council Program Specialist and
ISAC Coordinator, (202) 513–7243; Fax:
(202) 371–1751.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
Invasive Species Advisory Committee
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Notice of Public Meetings of the
Invasive Species Advisory Committee.
AGENCY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Pursuant to the provisions of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act,
notice is hereby given of meetings of the
Invasive Species Advisory Committee
(ISAC). Comprised of 30 nonfederal
invasive species experts and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Apr 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
Dated: April 16, 2012.
Lori C. Williams,
Executive Director, National Invasive Species
Council.
[FR Doc. 2012–9546 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2011–N276;
FGRS12610800000V5–123–FF08RSFC00]
Sears Point Wetland and Watershed
Restoration Project, Sonoma County,
CA; Final Environmental Impact Report
and Environmental Impact Statement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) and the
California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG), in cooperation with the
Sonoma Land Trust (SLT), announce
that a final environmental impact report
and environmental impact statement
(EIR/EIS) for the Sears Point Wetland
and Watershed Restoration Project is
now available. The final EIR/EIS, which
we prepared and now announce in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), describes the restoration of
approximately 2,300 acres (ac) of former
farmland located in Sonoma County,
California, near the San Pablo Bay. The
final EIR/EIS responds to all comments
we received on the draft document. The
restoration project, which would be
implemented by the SLT, would restore
natural estuarine ecosystems on diked
baylands, while providing public access
and recreational and educational
opportunities compatible with
ecological and cultural resources
protection. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, San Francisco District, and
the National Marine Fisheries Service of
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration are cooperating agencies
on the final EIR/EIS.
ADDRESSES: The Final EIR/EIS is
available at:
• Refuge Headquarters Office, San
Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge,
2100 Highway 37, Petaluma, CA 94954;
(707) 769–4200.
• San Francisco Bay National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 9500
Thornton Avenue, Newark, CA 94560;
(510) 792–0222.
• John F. Kennedy Public Library,
505 Santa Clara, Vallejo, CA 94590.
• Internet: www.sonomalandtrust.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don
Brubaker, Refuge Manager, San Pablo
Bay NWR, (707) 769–4200 x100 (phone);
don_brubaker@fws.gov. (email), or
Julian Meisler, Baylands Program
Manager, Sonoma Land Trust, at (707)
526–6930 x109 (phone);
julian@sonomalandtrust.org (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices
Location
The project site is located at Sears
Point, near the intersection of LakevilleReclamation Road and State Route 37
(SR 37) in southern Sonoma County,
California. The site is also traversed
from east to west by a rail line owned
by the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit
(SMART) District.
The project site is a total of 2,327 ac
owned by the Sonoma Land Trust (SLT)
and is comprised of two large
properties, the North Point Joint
Venture (NPJV) parcel and the Dickson
Ranch parcel, which are situated on the
edge of San Pablo Bay between the
mouth of the Petaluma River and Tolay
Creek. The 1,679-ac NPJV parcel
extends both north and south of SR 37.
The parcel is bounded on the north by
the Infineon Raceway property, on the
east by Cougar Mountain (north of SR
37) and Paradise Vineyards (south of SR
37), on the south by the SMART rail
line, and on the west by LakevilleReclamation Road. The 648-ac Dickson
Ranch parcel is located entirely south of
Highway 37, and is bounded on the
south by San Pablo Bay and on the west
by Tolay Creek and the outboard levee
as it veers bayward from the SMART
rail line. The entire Dickson Ranch
parcel and 858 ac of the NPJV parcel are
located within the approved acquisition
boundary of the Service’s San Pablo Bay
National Wildlife Refuge. The SLT is
transferring approximately 500-ac of the
land bounded by Highway 37 and the
SMART rail line to the Service, and the
remainder of the land to CDFG.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternatives
We identified and analyzed a total of
eight alternatives. The alternatives were
analyzed based on a set of criteria,
including (1) ability to meet the project
purpose and need; (2) technical,
logistical, and financial feasibility; and
(3) ability to avoid or substantially
reduce one or more significant impacts.
We removed five of these alternatives
from further consideration because they
did not meet the purpose and need,
were not feasible, or did not provide
substantial variation in environmental
impacts. The lead agencies carried
forward three possible alternatives for
environmental analysis: The No-Action
Alternative, the Partial-Tidal (Preferred)
Restoration Alternative, and the FullTidal Restoration Alternative.
No-Action Alternative
Under the No-Action Alternative,
there would be no wetland restoration
or enhancement, no new trails, and no
new habitat creation, with the exception
of the California red-legged frog
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Apr 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
enhancement, which would likely
proceed as a separate enhancement
project. The Sonoma Land Trust (SLT)
would maintain ownership of the
property north of Highway 37, and
would still move forward with the
transfer of title of the Sears Point
properties south of Highway 37 to the
Federal and State agencies. SLT will
honor existing agricultural and
commercial leases on the property
through May 2012.
Partial-Tidal (Proposed) Restoration
Alternative
The Partial-Tidal Restoration
Alternative would restore 955 acres of
tidal marsh; preserve and enhance a
106-acre area of non-tidal seasonal
wetland while maintaining agriculture
between the SMART line and Highway
37; provide public recreation access
south and possibly north of Highway 37;
and enhance 15.5 acres of additional
breeding habitat for the California redlegged frog, including 0.86 acres of
excavation in the floodplain near the
northern project boundary.
Full-Tidal Restoration Alternative
The Full-Tidal Restoration Alternative
would restore 1,352 acres of tidal marsh;
provide public recreation access south
and possibly north of Highway 37; and
enhance 15.5 acres of additional
breeding habitat, including 0.86 acres of
excavation in the floodplain, for the
California red-legged frog near the
northern project boundary.
NEPA Compliance
The entire Dickson Ranch parcel and
858 acres of the NPJV parcel are located
within the approved acquisition
boundary of the San Pablo Bay NWR.
Federally owned lands within the
Refuge boundary are adjacent to these
properties. In order to implement the
action alternatives described above,
some activity (levee breaching and
habitat restoration) within the San Pablo
Bay NWR is necessary. We will use the
EIR/EIS to determine whether to
authorize activities within the San Pablo
Bay NWR in order to accomplish project
goals.
The EIR/EIS discusses the direct,
indirect, and cumulative impacts of the
alternatives on biological resources,
cultural resources, land use, air quality,
water quality, water resources, and
other environmental resources. It also
identifies appropriate mitigation
measures for adverse environmental
effects.
Public Review
We conducted public review of the
EIR/EIS in accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23741
requirements of NEPA, as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its implementing
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
other applicable regulations, and our
procedures for compliance with those
regulations. The formal public comment
period for the draft EIR/EIS opened on
August 28, 2009, and closed on October
13, 2009. We announced the availability
of the draft document by several
methods, including press releases and
public notice, including a notice in the
Federal Register (74 FR 44379, August
28, 2009). While we received a number
of comments on the draft EIR/EIS, none
of the comments received from
interested individuals, groups, or
agencies required us or CDFG to add
new alternatives or to significantly alter
existing alternatives.
The EIR/EIS meets the requirements
of both NEPA and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The
California Department of Fish and Game
is the CEQA lead agency. The final EIR/
EIS contains our responses to all
comments received on the draft
document. Following the release of the
final EIR/EIS, we will prepare a Record
of Decision not sooner than 30 days
after the Environmental Protection
Agency has published its notice of filing
of the document in the Federal Register.
We anticipate that we will issue a
Record of Decision in the spring of
2012.
We provide this notice under
regulations implementing NEPA (40
CFR 1506.6).
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting, Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–9577 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–FHC–2012–N093;
FVHC98130406900Y4–XXX–FF04G01000]
DEEPWATER HORIZON Oil Spill; Final
Phase I Early Restoration Plan and
Environmental Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of final
report.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Framework Agreement for
Early Restoration Addressing Injuries
Resulting from the DEEPWATER
HORIZON Oil Spill (Framework
Agreement), notice is hereby given that
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23740-23741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9577]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-R-2011-N276; FGRS12610800000V5-123-FF08RSFC00]
Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration Project, Sonoma
County, CA; Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact
Statement
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and the
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), in cooperation with the
Sonoma Land Trust (SLT), announce that a final environmental impact
report and environmental impact statement (EIR/EIS) for the Sears Point
Wetland and Watershed Restoration Project is now available. The final
EIR/EIS, which we prepared and now announce in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), describes the
restoration of approximately 2,300 acres (ac) of former farmland
located in Sonoma County, California, near the San Pablo Bay. The final
EIR/EIS responds to all comments we received on the draft document. The
restoration project, which would be implemented by the SLT, would
restore natural estuarine ecosystems on diked baylands, while providing
public access and recreational and educational opportunities compatible
with ecological and cultural resources protection. The U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, San Francisco District, and the National Marine Fisheries
Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are
cooperating agencies on the final EIR/EIS.
ADDRESSES: The Final EIR/EIS is available at:
Refuge Headquarters Office, San Pablo Bay National
Wildlife Refuge, 2100 Highway 37, Petaluma, CA 94954; (707) 769-4200.
San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 9500
Thornton Avenue, Newark, CA 94560; (510) 792-0222.
John F. Kennedy Public Library, 505 Santa Clara, Vallejo,
CA 94590.
Internet: www.sonomalandtrust.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Brubaker, Refuge Manager, San
Pablo Bay NWR, (707) 769-4200 x100 (phone); don_brubaker@fws.gov.
(email), or Julian Meisler, Baylands Program Manager, Sonoma Land
Trust, at (707) 526-6930 x109 (phone); julian@sonomalandtrust.org
(email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 23741]]
Location
The project site is located at Sears Point, near the intersection
of Lakeville-Reclamation Road and State Route 37 (SR 37) in southern
Sonoma County, California. The site is also traversed from east to west
by a rail line owned by the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART)
District.
The project site is a total of 2,327 ac owned by the Sonoma Land
Trust (SLT) and is comprised of two large properties, the North Point
Joint Venture (NPJV) parcel and the Dickson Ranch parcel, which are
situated on the edge of San Pablo Bay between the mouth of the Petaluma
River and Tolay Creek. The 1,679-ac NPJV parcel extends both north and
south of SR 37. The parcel is bounded on the north by the Infineon
Raceway property, on the east by Cougar Mountain (north of SR 37) and
Paradise Vineyards (south of SR 37), on the south by the SMART rail
line, and on the west by Lakeville-Reclamation Road. The 648-ac Dickson
Ranch parcel is located entirely south of Highway 37, and is bounded on
the south by San Pablo Bay and on the west by Tolay Creek and the
outboard levee as it veers bayward from the SMART rail line. The entire
Dickson Ranch parcel and 858 ac of the NPJV parcel are located within
the approved acquisition boundary of the Service's San Pablo Bay
National Wildlife Refuge. The SLT is transferring approximately 500-ac
of the land bounded by Highway 37 and the SMART rail line to the
Service, and the remainder of the land to CDFG.
Alternatives
We identified and analyzed a total of eight alternatives. The
alternatives were analyzed based on a set of criteria, including (1)
ability to meet the project purpose and need; (2) technical,
logistical, and financial feasibility; and (3) ability to avoid or
substantially reduce one or more significant impacts. We removed five
of these alternatives from further consideration because they did not
meet the purpose and need, were not feasible, or did not provide
substantial variation in environmental impacts. The lead agencies
carried forward three possible alternatives for environmental analysis:
The No-Action Alternative, the Partial-Tidal (Preferred) Restoration
Alternative, and the Full-Tidal Restoration Alternative.
No-Action Alternative
Under the No-Action Alternative, there would be no wetland
restoration or enhancement, no new trails, and no new habitat creation,
with the exception of the California red-legged frog enhancement, which
would likely proceed as a separate enhancement project. The Sonoma Land
Trust (SLT) would maintain ownership of the property north of Highway
37, and would still move forward with the transfer of title of the
Sears Point properties south of Highway 37 to the Federal and State
agencies. SLT will honor existing agricultural and commercial leases on
the property through May 2012.
Partial-Tidal (Proposed) Restoration Alternative
The Partial-Tidal Restoration Alternative would restore 955 acres
of tidal marsh; preserve and enhance a 106-acre area of non-tidal
seasonal wetland while maintaining agriculture between the SMART line
and Highway 37; provide public recreation access south and possibly
north of Highway 37; and enhance 15.5 acres of additional breeding
habitat for the California red-legged frog, including 0.86 acres of
excavation in the floodplain near the northern project boundary.
Full-Tidal Restoration Alternative
The Full-Tidal Restoration Alternative would restore 1,352 acres of
tidal marsh; provide public recreation access south and possibly north
of Highway 37; and enhance 15.5 acres of additional breeding habitat,
including 0.86 acres of excavation in the floodplain, for the
California red-legged frog near the northern project boundary.
NEPA Compliance
The entire Dickson Ranch parcel and 858 acres of the NPJV parcel
are located within the approved acquisition boundary of the San Pablo
Bay NWR. Federally owned lands within the Refuge boundary are adjacent
to these properties. In order to implement the action alternatives
described above, some activity (levee breaching and habitat
restoration) within the San Pablo Bay NWR is necessary. We will use the
EIR/EIS to determine whether to authorize activities within the San
Pablo Bay NWR in order to accomplish project goals.
The EIR/EIS discusses the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts
of the alternatives on biological resources, cultural resources, land
use, air quality, water quality, water resources, and other
environmental resources. It also identifies appropriate mitigation
measures for adverse environmental effects.
Public Review
We conducted public review of the EIR/EIS in accordance with the
requirements of NEPA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its
implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), other applicable
regulations, and our procedures for compliance with those regulations.
The formal public comment period for the draft EIR/EIS opened on August
28, 2009, and closed on October 13, 2009. We announced the availability
of the draft document by several methods, including press releases and
public notice, including a notice in the Federal Register (74 FR 44379,
August 28, 2009). While we received a number of comments on the draft
EIR/EIS, none of the comments received from interested individuals,
groups, or agencies required us or CDFG to add new alternatives or to
significantly alter existing alternatives.
The EIR/EIS meets the requirements of both NEPA and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The California Department of Fish and
Game is the CEQA lead agency. The final EIR/EIS contains our responses
to all comments received on the draft document. Following the release
of the final EIR/EIS, we will prepare a Record of Decision not sooner
than 30 days after the Environmental Protection Agency has published
its notice of filing of the document in the Federal Register. We
anticipate that we will issue a Record of Decision in the spring of
2012.
We provide this notice under regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR
1506.6).
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting, Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-9577 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P