Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems, 23618-23619 [2012-9534]
Download as PDF
23618
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
reimbursement no later than 1 year after
May 21, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(The Office of Management and Budget has
approved the information collection
requirements in this section under control
number 2900–0620.)
5. Amend § 17.1005 by adding
paragraphs (e) and (f), to read as follows:
■
§ 17.1005
Payment limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) If an eligible veteran under
§ 17.1002 has contractual or legal
recourse against a third party that would
only partially extinguish the veteran’s
liability to the provider of emergency
treatment, then:
(1) VA will be the secondary payer;
(2) Subject to the limitations of this
section, VA will pay the difference
between the amount VA would have
paid under this section for the cost of
the emergency treatment and the
amount paid (or payable) by the third
party; and
(3) The provider will consider the
combined payment under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section as payment in full
and extinguish the veteran’s liability to
the provider.
(f) VA will not reimburse a claimant
under this section for any deductible,
copayment or similar payment that the
veteran owes the third party.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–9265 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 501 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector
General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95–
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
§ 501.14 Postage Evidencing System
inventory control processes.
39 CFR Part 501
Authority To Manufacture and
Distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service is adopting
an editorial revision of the rules
concerning inventory controls for
Postage Evidencing Systems (PES).
These changes are intended to clarify
the rules, and reflect a change in the
name of the office responsible for
enforcing them.
DATES: This rule is effective May 21,
2012.
SUMMARY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO
MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE
POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
2. Section 501.14 is revised to read as
follows:
POSTAL SERVICE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Programs
Specialist, Payment Technology, U.S.
Postal Service, at 202–268–7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 1, 2011, the Postal Service
proposed an editorial revision of the
16:08 Apr 19, 2012
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 501 is
amended as follows:
■
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
rules governing the inventory control
processes of PES provided to customers
by manufacturers or distributors. The
office formerly known as Postage
Technology Management (PTM) is now
known as Payment Technology, making
it necessary to modify the numerous
references to PTM in 39 CFR 501.14 to
reflect the new name. In addition, the
Postal Service believed it was
appropriate to take this opportunity to
make a number of minor editorial
changes throughout § 501.14 to improve
its clarity. None of these changes was
intended to modify the substantive
requirements of the section. No
comments were received concerning
this proposal. Accordingly, the
proposed revision to § 501.14 is adopted
without further changes.
Jkt 226001
(a) Each authorized provider of
Postage Evidencing Systems must
permanently hold title to all Postage
Evidencing Systems that it
manufactures or distributes, except
those purchased by the Postal Service or
distributed outside the United States.
(b) An authorized provider must
maintain sufficient facilities for and
records of the business relationship,
distribution, control, storage,
maintenance, repair, replacement, and
destruction or disposal of all Postage
Evidencing Systems and their
components to enable accurate
accounting and location thereof
throughout the entire life cycle of each
Postage Evidencing System. A complete
record shall entail a list by serial
number of all Postage Evidencing
Systems manufactured or distributed
showing all movements of each system
from the time that it is produced until
it is scrapped, and the reading of the
ascending register each time the system
is checked into or out of service. These
records must be available for inspection
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
by Postal Service officials at any time
during business hours.
(c) To ensure adequate control over
Postage Evidencing Systems, plans for
the following subjects must be
submitted for prior approval, in writing,
to the office of Payment Technology.
(1) Service procedures for all Postage
Evidencing Systems—these are
procedures to address the process to be
used for new Postage Evidencing
Systems as well as those previously
leased to another customer.
(2) Transportation and storage of
Postage Evidencing Systems—these are
procedures that provide reasonable
precautions to prevent use by
unauthorized individuals. Providers
must ship all postage meters by Postal
Service Registered Mail® service unless
given written permission by the Postal
Service to use another carrier. The
provider must demonstrate that the
alternative delivery carrier employs
security procedures equivalent to those
for Registered Mail service.
(3) Postage Evidencing System
examination/inspection procedures and
schedule—the provider is required to
perform postage meter examinations or
inspections based on an approved
schedule. Failure to complete the
postage meter examination or
inspections by the due date may result
in the Postal Service requiring the
provider to disable the meter’s resetting
capability. If necessary, the Postal
Service shall notify the customer that
the postage meter is to be removed from
service and the authorization to use a
Postage Evidencing System revoked,
following the procedures for revocation
specified by regulation. The Postal
Service shall notify the provider to
remove the postage meter from the
customer’s location.
(4) Out-of-service procedures for a
nonfaulty Postage Evidencing System—
these procedures must be used when the
system is to be removed from service for
any reason.
(5) Postage Evidencing System repair
process—any physical or electronic
access to the internal components of a
postage meter, as well as any access to
software or security parameters, must be
conducted within an approved facility
under the provider’s direct control and
active supervision. To prevent
unauthorized use, the provider or any
third party acting on its behalf must
keep secure any equipment or other
component that can be used to open or
access the internal, electronic, or secure
components of a postage meter.
(6) Handling procedures for faulty
meters—the provider must maintain
handling procedures for faulty meters,
including those that are inoperable, mis-
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
registering, have unreadable registers,
inaccurately reflect their current status,
show any evidence of possible
tampering or abuse, and those for which
there is any indication that the postage
meter has some mechanical or electrical
malfunction of any critical security
component, such as any component the
improper operation of which could
adversely affect Postal Service revenues,
or of any memory component, or that
affects the accuracy of the registers or
the accuracy of the value printed.
(7) Lost or stolen postage meter
procedures—the provider must
promptly report to the Postal Service the
loss or theft of any postage meter or the
recovery of any lost or stolen postage
meter. Such notification to the Postal
Service will be made by completing and
filing a standardized lost and stolen
meter incident report within 10
calendar days of the provider’s
determination of a meter loss, theft, or
recovery.
(8) Postage meter destruction—when
required, the postage meter must be
rendered completely inoperable by the
destruction process and associated
postage; printing dies and components
must be destroyed. Manufacturers or
distributors of meters must submit the
proposed destruction method; a
schedule listing the postage meters to be
destroyed, by serial number and model;
and the proposed time and place of
destruction to Payment Technology for
approval prior to any meter destruction.
Providers must record and retain the
serial numbers of the meters to be
destroyed and provide a list of such
serial numbers in electronic form in
accordance with Postal Service
requirements for meter accounting and
tracking systems. Providers must give
sufficient advance notice of the
destruction to allow Payment
Technology to schedule observation by
its designated representative who shall
verify that the destruction is performed
in accordance with a Postal Serviceapproved method or process. To the
extent that the Postal Service elects not
to observe a particular destruction, the
provider must submit a certification of
destruction, including the serial
number(s), to the Postal Service within
5 calendar days of destruction. These
requirements for meter destruction
apply to all postage meters, Postage
Evidencing Systems, and postal security
devices included as a component of a
Postage Evidencing System.
(d) If the provider uses a third party
to perform functions that may have an
impact upon a Postage Evidencing
System (especially its security),
including, but not limited to, business
relationships, repair, maintenance, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Apr 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
disposal of Postage Evidencing Systems,
Payment Technology must be advised in
advance of all aspects of the
relationship, as they relate to the
custody and control of Postage
Evidencing Systems and must
specifically authorize in writing the
proposed arrangement between the
parties.
(1) Postal Service authorization of a
third-party relationship to perform
specific functions applies only to the
functions stated in the written
authorization but may be amended to
embrace additional functions.
(2) No third-party relationship shall
compromise the Postage Evidencing
System, or its components, including,
but not limited to, the hardware,
software, communications, and security
components, or of any security-related
system with which it interfaces,
including, but not limited to, the
resetting system, reporting systems, and
Postal Service support systems. The
functions of the third party with respect
to a Postage Evidencing System, its
components, and the systems with
which it interfaces are subject to the
same scrutiny as the equivalent
functions of the provider.
(3) Any authorized third party must
keep adequate facilities for and records
of Postage Evidencing Systems and their
components in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section. All such
facilities and records are subject to
inspection by Postal Service
representatives, insofar as they are used
to distribute, control, store, maintain,
repair, replace, destroy, or dispose of
Postage Evidencing Systems.
(4) The provider must ensure that any
party acting on its behalf in any of the
functions described in paragraph (b) of
this section maintains adequate
facilities, records, and procedures for
the security of the Postage Evidencing
Systems. Deficiencies in the operations
of a third party relating to the custody
and control of Postage Evidencing
Systems, unless corrected in a timely
manner, can place at risk a provider’s
approval to manufacture and/or
distribute Postage Evidencing Systems.
(5) The Postal Service reserves the
right to review all aspects of any
relationship if it appears that the
relationship poses a threat to Postage
Evidencing System security and may
require the provider to take appropriate
corrective action. By entering into any
relationship under this section, the
provider is not relieved of any
responsibility to the Postal Service, and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23619
such must be stated in any
memorialization of the relationship.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2012–9534 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0118; FRL–9662–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Alabama:
Removal of State Low-Reid Vapor
Pressure Requirement for the
Birmingham Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Alabama State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted
by the Alabama Department of
Environmental Management (ADEM),
on January 10, 2012, for parallel
processing. ADEM submitted the final
version of the SIP revision on March 2,
2012. The revision modifies Alabama’s
SIP to move Chapter 335–3–20 ‘‘Control
of Fuels,’’ which includes the regulation
that governs the State’s 7.0 pounds per
square inch (psi) requirement for the
low-Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) fuel
program in Jefferson and Shelby
Counties (hereafter referred to as the
‘‘Birmingham Area’’) from the active
measures portion of the Alabama SIP to
the contingency measures portions of
the maintenance plans for the
Birmingham Area for the ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS
or standards), and of the proposed
maintenance plans for the 1997 annual
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standards,
and the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards,
when those actions are finalized. The
change to the SIP will result in the
federal RVP requirement of 7.8 psi
applying for the Birmingham Area. EPA
is approving this SIP revision because
the State has demonstrated that it is
consistent with section 110 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This final rule is effective April
20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0118. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23618-23619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9534]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 501
Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems
AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is adopting an editorial revision of the
rules concerning inventory controls for Postage Evidencing Systems
(PES). These changes are intended to clarify the rules, and reflect a
change in the name of the office responsible for enforcing them.
DATES: This rule is effective May 21, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Programs
Specialist, Payment Technology, U.S. Postal Service, at 202-268-7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 1, 2011, the Postal Service
proposed an editorial revision of the rules governing the inventory
control processes of PES provided to customers by manufacturers or
distributors. The office formerly known as Postage Technology
Management (PTM) is now known as Payment Technology, making it
necessary to modify the numerous references to PTM in 39 CFR 501.14 to
reflect the new name. In addition, the Postal Service believed it was
appropriate to take this opportunity to make a number of minor
editorial changes throughout Sec. 501.14 to improve its clarity. None
of these changes was intended to modify the substantive requirements of
the section. No comments were received concerning this proposal.
Accordingly, the proposed revision to Sec. 501.14 is adopted without
further changes.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Administrative practice and procedure.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 501 is amended as follows:
PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE
EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410,
2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
0
2. Section 501.14 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 501.14 Postage Evidencing System inventory control processes.
(a) Each authorized provider of Postage Evidencing Systems must
permanently hold title to all Postage Evidencing Systems that it
manufactures or distributes, except those purchased by the Postal
Service or distributed outside the United States.
(b) An authorized provider must maintain sufficient facilities for
and records of the business relationship, distribution, control,
storage, maintenance, repair, replacement, and destruction or disposal
of all Postage Evidencing Systems and their components to enable
accurate accounting and location thereof throughout the entire life
cycle of each Postage Evidencing System. A complete record shall entail
a list by serial number of all Postage Evidencing Systems manufactured
or distributed showing all movements of each system from the time that
it is produced until it is scrapped, and the reading of the ascending
register each time the system is checked into or out of service. These
records must be available for inspection by Postal Service officials at
any time during business hours.
(c) To ensure adequate control over Postage Evidencing Systems,
plans for the following subjects must be submitted for prior approval,
in writing, to the office of Payment Technology.
(1) Service procedures for all Postage Evidencing Systems--these
are procedures to address the process to be used for new Postage
Evidencing Systems as well as those previously leased to another
customer.
(2) Transportation and storage of Postage Evidencing Systems--these
are procedures that provide reasonable precautions to prevent use by
unauthorized individuals. Providers must ship all postage meters by
Postal Service Registered Mail[supreg] service unless given written
permission by the Postal Service to use another carrier. The provider
must demonstrate that the alternative delivery carrier employs security
procedures equivalent to those for Registered Mail service.
(3) Postage Evidencing System examination/inspection procedures and
schedule--the provider is required to perform postage meter
examinations or inspections based on an approved schedule. Failure to
complete the postage meter examination or inspections by the due date
may result in the Postal Service requiring the provider to disable the
meter's resetting capability. If necessary, the Postal Service shall
notify the customer that the postage meter is to be removed from
service and the authorization to use a Postage Evidencing System
revoked, following the procedures for revocation specified by
regulation. The Postal Service shall notify the provider to remove the
postage meter from the customer's location.
(4) Out-of-service procedures for a nonfaulty Postage Evidencing
System--these procedures must be used when the system is to be removed
from service for any reason.
(5) Postage Evidencing System repair process--any physical or
electronic access to the internal components of a postage meter, as
well as any access to software or security parameters, must be
conducted within an approved facility under the provider's direct
control and active supervision. To prevent unauthorized use, the
provider or any third party acting on its behalf must keep secure any
equipment or other component that can be used to open or access the
internal, electronic, or secure components of a postage meter.
(6) Handling procedures for faulty meters--the provider must
maintain handling procedures for faulty meters, including those that
are inoperable, mis-
[[Page 23619]]
registering, have unreadable registers, inaccurately reflect their
current status, show any evidence of possible tampering or abuse, and
those for which there is any indication that the postage meter has some
mechanical or electrical malfunction of any critical security
component, such as any component the improper operation of which could
adversely affect Postal Service revenues, or of any memory component,
or that affects the accuracy of the registers or the accuracy of the
value printed.
(7) Lost or stolen postage meter procedures--the provider must
promptly report to the Postal Service the loss or theft of any postage
meter or the recovery of any lost or stolen postage meter. Such
notification to the Postal Service will be made by completing and
filing a standardized lost and stolen meter incident report within 10
calendar days of the provider's determination of a meter loss, theft,
or recovery.
(8) Postage meter destruction--when required, the postage meter
must be rendered completely inoperable by the destruction process and
associated postage; printing dies and components must be destroyed.
Manufacturers or distributors of meters must submit the proposed
destruction method; a schedule listing the postage meters to be
destroyed, by serial number and model; and the proposed time and place
of destruction to Payment Technology for approval prior to any meter
destruction. Providers must record and retain the serial numbers of the
meters to be destroyed and provide a list of such serial numbers in
electronic form in accordance with Postal Service requirements for
meter accounting and tracking systems. Providers must give sufficient
advance notice of the destruction to allow Payment Technology to
schedule observation by its designated representative who shall verify
that the destruction is performed in accordance with a Postal Service-
approved method or process. To the extent that the Postal Service
elects not to observe a particular destruction, the provider must
submit a certification of destruction, including the serial number(s),
to the Postal Service within 5 calendar days of destruction. These
requirements for meter destruction apply to all postage meters, Postage
Evidencing Systems, and postal security devices included as a component
of a Postage Evidencing System.
(d) If the provider uses a third party to perform functions that
may have an impact upon a Postage Evidencing System (especially its
security), including, but not limited to, business relationships,
repair, maintenance, and disposal of Postage Evidencing Systems,
Payment Technology must be advised in advance of all aspects of the
relationship, as they relate to the custody and control of Postage
Evidencing Systems and must specifically authorize in writing the
proposed arrangement between the parties.
(1) Postal Service authorization of a third-party relationship to
perform specific functions applies only to the functions stated in the
written authorization but may be amended to embrace additional
functions.
(2) No third-party relationship shall compromise the Postage
Evidencing System, or its components, including, but not limited to,
the hardware, software, communications, and security components, or of
any security-related system with which it interfaces, including, but
not limited to, the resetting system, reporting systems, and Postal
Service support systems. The functions of the third party with respect
to a Postage Evidencing System, its components, and the systems with
which it interfaces are subject to the same scrutiny as the equivalent
functions of the provider.
(3) Any authorized third party must keep adequate facilities for
and records of Postage Evidencing Systems and their components in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. All such facilities and
records are subject to inspection by Postal Service representatives,
insofar as they are used to distribute, control, store, maintain,
repair, replace, destroy, or dispose of Postage Evidencing Systems.
(4) The provider must ensure that any party acting on its behalf in
any of the functions described in paragraph (b) of this section
maintains adequate facilities, records, and procedures for the security
of the Postage Evidencing Systems. Deficiencies in the operations of a
third party relating to the custody and control of Postage Evidencing
Systems, unless corrected in a timely manner, can place at risk a
provider's approval to manufacture and/or distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems.
(5) The Postal Service reserves the right to review all aspects of
any relationship if it appears that the relationship poses a threat to
Postage Evidencing System security and may require the provider to take
appropriate corrective action. By entering into any relationship under
this section, the provider is not relieved of any responsibility to the
Postal Service, and such must be stated in any memorialization of the
relationship.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2012-9534 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P