Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-3D PDF Consortium, Inc., 23754 [2012-9521]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
23754
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices
Ninestar and Epson. On February 14,
2012, the ALJ issued an initial
determination (ID) granting the joint
motion. No petitions for review of the ID
were filed.
On February 8, 2012, Epson filed a
motion for summary determination with
respect to Epson’s petition for
modification of the remedial orders. On
February 13, 2012, Ninestar filed a nonopposition to Epson’s motion. On
February 21, 2012, the ALJ issued a
Recommendation on Modification of the
Remedial Orders. Based on undisputed
facts and the arguments of Epson and
Ninestar, the ALJ recommended
modifying the general exclusion order
and cease and desist order to include
components of ink cartridges.
The Commission has determined to
adopt the ALJ’s recommendation and
modify the general exclusion order and
the cease and desist order issued to
Ninestar U.S. to include components of
ink cartridges, as well as ink cartridges.
The consolidated advisory and
modification proceedings are
terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.76 and 210.79 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.76, 210.79).
SOUTH AFRICA, have been added as
parties to this venture.
Also, MBC Group, Dubai, UNITED
ARAB EMIRATES; National
Geographical-Intelligence Agency,
Herndon, VA; SAIC, McLean, VA;
Toshiba, Wayne, NJ; John Footen
(individual member), Lansdowne, VA;
Robert Gummesson (individual
member), London, UNITED KINGDOM;
Gwynne McConkey (individual
member), Leonia, NJ; and Salvador Villa
Vidaler, Madrid, SPAIN, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and Advanced
Media Workflow Association, Inc.
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media
Workflow Association, Inc. filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 21, 2011.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 20, 2012 (77 FR 3007).
By Order of the Commission.
Issued: April 16, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–9505 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[FR Doc. 2012–9523 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Antitrust Division
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993; Advanced Media Workflow
Association, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on March
27, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Advanced Media
Workflow Association, Inc. has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Media-Alliance, Brescia, SPAIN; and
SuperSport, Randburg, Johannesburg,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Apr 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—3D PDF Consortium, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on March
27, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 3D PDF Consortium,
Inc. (‘‘3D PDF’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objectives of the venture.
The notifications were filed for the
purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are PROSTEP AG, Dolivostr,
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Darmstadt, GERMANY; Adobe Systems
Incorporated, San Jose, CA; Anark
Corporation, Boulder, CO; Aras
Corporation, Andover, MA; Tetra 4D,
LLC, Seattle, WA; Tech Soft 3D,
Berkeley, CA; and EOS Solutions
Corporation, Rochester, MI.
The general areas of 3D PDF’s
planned activity are (a) to demonstrate
the value and promote the use of
products complying with standards
enabling three dimensional
representation, such as 3D PDF, the PRC
data format, and PDF/E 2.0
(‘‘Specifications’’); (b) to communicate
information regarding the updating and
the development of existing and
additional Specifications beneficial to
providers and consumers of three
dimensional rendering solutions; and (c)
to educate international standards
committees and government bodies
about the needs of developers and users
of Specification-compliant products and
services.
In support of these purposes, 3D PDF
may engage in some or all of the
following activities: (a) Host committees
that develop materials in support of 3D
PDF’s mission; (b) operate a branding
program based upon distinctive
trademarks to create high customer
awareness of, demand for, and
confidence in products designed in
compliance with Specifications; (c)
create printed and electronic materials
for distribution to members and nonmembers; (d) maintain its own Web site;
(e) coordinate the promotion of
Specifications among members and nonmembers, as well as create basic
marketing promotional collateral (e.g.,
both web pages as well as tangible
materials); (f) maintain relations with
standard-setting organizations and
industry consortia to promote coherence
among Specifications; and (g) undertake
such other activities as the Board of
Directors may from time to time
approve. 3D PDF is not engaged in and
does not intend to engage in production
activities.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–9521 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—OpenSAF Foundation
Notice is hereby given that, on March
30, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9521]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--3D PDF Consortium, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on March 27, 2012, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), 3D PDF Consortium, Inc. (``3D
PDF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to
actual damages under specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties
to the venture are PROSTEP AG, Dolivostr, Darmstadt, GERMANY; Adobe
Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA; Anark Corporation, Boulder, CO;
Aras Corporation, Andover, MA; Tetra 4D, LLC, Seattle, WA; Tech Soft
3D, Berkeley, CA; and EOS Solutions Corporation, Rochester, MI.
The general areas of 3D PDF's planned activity are (a) to
demonstrate the value and promote the use of products complying with
standards enabling three dimensional representation, such as 3D PDF,
the PRC data format, and PDF/E 2.0 (``Specifications''); (b) to
communicate information regarding the updating and the development of
existing and additional Specifications beneficial to providers and
consumers of three dimensional rendering solutions; and (c) to educate
international standards committees and government bodies about the
needs of developers and users of Specification-compliant products and
services.
In support of these purposes, 3D PDF may engage in some or all of
the following activities: (a) Host committees that develop materials in
support of 3D PDF's mission; (b) operate a branding program based upon
distinctive trademarks to create high customer awareness of, demand
for, and confidence in products designed in compliance with
Specifications; (c) create printed and electronic materials for
distribution to members and non-members; (d) maintain its own Web site;
(e) coordinate the promotion of Specifications among members and non-
members, as well as create basic marketing promotional collateral
(e.g., both web pages as well as tangible materials); (f) maintain
relations with standard-setting organizations and industry consortia to
promote coherence among Specifications; and (g) undertake such other
activities as the Board of Directors may from time to time approve. 3D
PDF is not engaged in and does not intend to engage in production
activities.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-9521 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
