Notice of Availability of the Proposed John Day Basin Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, Oregon., 23747-23749 [2012-9502]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES protection of serpentine habitat. General minimization measures will include: • Limiting staging and work areas to the project site only, or to existing paved roads, • Removal of all food-related trash every 3 days, • Prohibiting pets from the project site during construction, • Restricting ground disturbance to the period of July 1 through November 30 (generally the dry season), unless we authorize otherwise, and • Maintenance of all equipment to avoid fluid leaks. The applicant proposes to build a 0.60-acre residential home, which includes the single-family residence, detached garage, landscaped area, underground water line, and driveway. This development will be at the top of the property. There will be an additional septic system and septic leach field area of approximately 0.80 acre slightly west and downslope from the residence. Neither the residence nor the leach field area will directly affect serpentine species, but could result in indirect effects. Alternatives Our proposed action is approving the applicant’s Plan and issuance of an incidental take permit for the applicant’s covered activities. As required by the Act, the applicant’s Plan considers alternatives to the take under the proposed action. The Plan considers the environmental consequences of one alternative to the proposed action, the No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, we would not issue a permit; the applicant would not build the proposed single-family residence; the project area would continue to experience illegal off-road vehicle use, illegal trash dumping, and trespassing; and no take would occur for the construction of the residence and its associated structures. For these reasons, the No-Action Alternative has been rejected. Under the Proposed Action Alternative, we would issue an incidental take permit for the applicant’s proposed project, which includes the activities described above. The Proposed Action Alternative would result in permanent loss of 1.40 acres of grassland habitat for the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Santa Clara Valley dudleya, and most beautiful jewelflower. To mitigate for these effects, the applicant proposes to protect, enhance, and manage in perpetuity 2.5 acres of on-site serpentine grassland. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:17 Apr 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 National Environmental Policy Act As described in our EAS, we have made the preliminary determination that approval of the proposed Plan and issuance of the permit would qualify as a categorical exclusion under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as provided by Federal regulations (40 CFR part 1500, 5(k), 1507.3(b)(2), 1508.4) and the Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 2 and 516 DM 8). Our EAS found that the proposed plan qualifies as a ‘‘low-effect’’ habitat conservation plan, as defined by our Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook (November 1996). Determination of low-effect habitat conservation plans is based on the following three criteria: (1) Implementation of the proposed plan would result in minor or negligible effects on federally-listed, proposed, and candidate species and their habitats; (2) implementation of the proposed plan would result in minor or negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and (3) impacts of the plan, considered together with the impacts of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects, would not result, over time, in cumulative effects to environmental values or resources that would be considered significant. Based upon the preliminary determinations in the EAS, we do not intend to prepare further NEPA documentation. We will consider public comments when making the final determination on whether to prepare an additional NEPA document on the proposed action. Public Comments We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party on this notice. We particularly seek comments on the following: 1. Biological information concerning the species; 2. Relevant data concerning the species; 3. Additional information concerning the range, distribution, population size, and population trends of the species; 4. Current or planned activities in the subject area and their possible impacts on the species; 5. The presence of archeological sites, buildings and structures, historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic preservation concerns, which are required to be considered in project planning by the National Historic Preservation Act; and 6. Identification of any other environmental issues that should be PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23747 considered with regard to the proposed development and permit action. Authority We provide this notice pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act and the NEPA public-involvement regulations (40 CFR 1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and 1506.6). We will evaluate the permit application, including the Plan, and comments we receive to determine whether the application meets the requirements of section 10(a) of the Act. If the requirements are met, we will issue a permit to the applicant for the incidental take of the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Santa Clara Valley dudleya, and most beautiful jewelflower from the implementation of the covered activities described in the Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly and Serpentine Grasslands, City of San Jose, Santa Clara County, California. We will make the final permit decision no sooner than 30 days after the date of this notice. Dated: April 13, 2012. Susan Moore, Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. 2012–9543 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLORP0000.16100000.DQ0000 LXSS053H0000 HAG10–0234] Notice of Availability of the Proposed John Day Basin Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, Oregon. Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability. AGENCY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Proposed Resource Management Plan (RMP)/Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the John Day Basin planning area and by this notice is announcing its availability. DATES: The BLM planning regulations state that any person who meets the conditions as described in the regulations may protest the BLM’s Proposed RMP/Final EIS. A person who meets the conditions and files a protest must file the protest within 30 days of the date that the Environmental SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 23748 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices Protection Agency publishes its notice in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Copies of the John Day Basin Proposed RMP/Final EIS have been sent to affected Federal, State, and local government agencies and to other stakeholders, organizations, agencies and interested parties on the John Day Basin Resource Management Plan (RMP) mailing list. Copies of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS are available for public inspection at the Prineville Field Office during regular business hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays) at 3050 NE 3rd Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754. Interested persons may also review the Proposed RMP/Final EIS on the Internet at https:// www.blm.gov/or/districts/prineville/ plans/johndayrmp/jdbdocuments.php. All protests must be in writing and mailed to one of the following addresses: Regular Mail: Director (210), Attn: Brenda Hudgens-Williamsm, P.O. Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024–1383. Overnight Mail: Director (210), Attn: Brenda Hudgens-Williams, 20 M Street SE., Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Monte Kuk, John Day Basin RMP Project Leader, BLM Prineville Field Office, 3050 NE 3rd Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754; telephone (541) 416–6700; email John_Day_Basin_RMP@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 800–877–8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The planning area is located in parts of Sherman, Gilliam, Morrow, Umatilla, Grant, Wheeler, Jefferson, and Wasco Counties in the State of Oregon, covering 456,000 acres of BLM-managed public land. Prior to this plan, the public land in this area was managed under three RMPs, which were completed in the 1980s: John Day RMP (Record of Decision signed 1985), Two Rivers RMP (1986), and Baker RMP (1989). The John Day RMP was amended in 1995. In 2001, the John Day River Plan amended portions of all three RMPs. New information and changed circumstances are cause for the BLM to update these plans. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to: Acquisition of 44,000 acres along North Fork John Day River, VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:17 Apr 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 congressional designation of the Spring Basin Wilderness, heightened public interest in BLM management actions, increasing demand for recreation activities on public lands, and expanded scientific knowledge and information pertaining to the conservation of aquatic species. In February 2006, the BLM published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS and initiate revision/amendment of the existing RMPs. In March 2006, the BLM hosted five public open houses across the planning area and in Portland, Oregon, to solicit public input on the issues to be addressed. The BLM published results of public input and an Analysis of the Management Situation in December 2006, followed by four public open houses across the planning area to solicit input on criteria to be used in development of alternatives. Throughout the planning process the BLM maintained updated wilderness characteristics inventories for all lands outside of areas designated as Wilderness or Wilderness Study Areas (WSA) to determine lands with wilderness characteristics (LWCs) in the planning area. After publication of the Draft RMP in October 2008, the BLM hosted a series of open houses throughout Oregon to present proposed actions in the Draft RMP and gather public comment. Public comments were accepted from October 30, 2008, to January 29, 2009. Comments were submitted via U.S. mail, direct email, email generated from the planning Web page, orally at open houses, and via telephone. The BLM also met regularly with the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council and with representatives of local, State, and other Federal government agencies, as well as tribal governments. Additionally, the BLM maintained a public Web site and mailed periodic newsletters with information on the plan’s status. Comments on the Draft RMP/Draft EIS received from the public, John Day/ Snake Resource Advisory Council, John Day Basin RMP Cooperating Agencies, and internal BLM review were considered and incorporated as appropriate into the proposed plan. Public comments resulted in the addition of clarifying text, but did not significantly change proposed land use plan decisions. The Proposed RMP/Final EIS analyzes five alternatives. Alternative 1 (no action) would continue the current management goals, objectives, and direction specified in the existing RMPs. Alternative 2 (Proposed Resource Management Plan) would provide a mix of recreational opportunities, economic PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 opportunities, and resource protection. Changes from Alternative 1 to 2 include: (a) Development of an interim road system and a process for developing a final transportation plan; (b) A reduction in areas ‘‘open’’ for motorized use off of roads; (c) Synthesized management direction to achieve forest and upland health goals while providing for timber and forage production and wildfire prevention; (d) Management direction for the North Fork John Day River lands that, in accordance with the land acquisition legislation, protects native fish, wildlife habitat, and public recreation; (e) Addition of an integrated strategy to address fish, water quality, and water quantity together; (f) Provides management protection of wilderness characteristics on 19,442 of the 35,457 acres identified as Lands with Wilderness Characteristics, and a determination that management for other resource considerations is more appropriate on the remaining 16,015 acres; (g) Use of ‘‘appropriate response’’ rather than full suppression of all wildfires; (h) A process for addressing permit/ lease relinquishment for grazing allotments; and (i) Wild and Scenic River suitability recommendation for 37 miles of the North Fork River. Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 are similar to Alternative 2 in most instances, but provide variation in the amount of roadway open for motorized travel, the number of areas open to off-road motorized use, the amount of LWC protected, the number and classifications of river segments deemed suitable for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic River System, and the number of acres where livestock grazing is permitted. The BLM Proposed RMP (Alternative 2) and Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 (the Action Alternatives) propose immediate designation of five new Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), totaling 62,407 acres. This total includes the 1,153-acre expansion of the existing Horn Butte ACEC. The largest of the new proposed ACECs is the 38,168-acre John Day Paleontological ACEC that would complement the adjacent John Day Fossil Beds National Monument and partially overlap the existing Sutton Mountain WSA. Resource use limitations associated with designation of this ACEC where it overlaps the WSA would include closure to salable, locatable and leasable minerals, a No Surface Occupancy (NSO) stipulation E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices for energy and communication site development, exclusion from rights-ofway, management to Visual Resource Management Class II (VRM II) standards, and limiting vehicle use to designated roads and trails. Use limitations associated with this ACEC where it does not overlap with the Sutton Mountain WSA would be similar except for an NSO stipulation for mineral leasing, and other special stipulations for developments for energy, communication sites, and rightsof-way. Other proposed ACECs include the 6,639-acre Black Canyon RNA/ ACEC, which would protect several sensitive plants and unique plant communities. Use limitations for this proposed ACEC include exclusion of livestock grazing, closure to off-highway motorized vehicles, an NSO stipulation for mineral leasing, closure to salable mineral, energy and communication site development, and exclusion of rights-ofway. The proposed plan would also add 1,153 acres to the existing 5,999-acre Horn Butte ACEC to protect Washington ground squirrel habitat. Use limitations for the expanded Horn Butte ACEC include management to VRM II standards, prohibition of mechanical noxious weed control in Fourmile Canyon, an NSO stipulation for mineral leasing, closure to salable minerals and energy and communication site development, and exclusion of rights-ofway. Also proposed is the addition of the North Fork John Day River (16,837 acres), Armstrong Canyon (3,885 acres) and Ferry Canyon (2,364 acres) ACECs to protect visual resource values. Use limitations include management to VRM II standards, NSO stipulation for mineral leasing, closure to communication site development, and exclusion of rights-of-way. The proposed plan also eliminates the existing Spanish Gulch ACEC (333 acres). In the event that Congress releases any of the three WSAs along the lower John Day River (Lower John Day, North Pole Ridge, and Thirtymile) from WSA status, the released lands would be designated as ACECs to preserve scenic and other values. Use limitations would include management to VRM II standards, NSO stipulation for mineral leasing and closure to salable minerals, closure to energy and communication site development, and exclusion of rights-of-way (except for the existing PGE pipeline right-of-way). For more detailed information on each ACEC proposal, see the Special Designations section in the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. Instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM regarding the Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:17 Apr 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 in the ‘‘Dear Reader’’ letter of the John Day Basin Proposed RMP/Final EIS and at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. Emailed and faxed protests will not be accepted as valid protests unless the protesting party also provides the original letter by either regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the protest period. Under these conditions, the BLM will consider the emailed or faxed protest as an advanced copy and it will receive full consideration. If you wish to provide the BLM with such advance notification, please direct faxed protests to the attention of the BLM protest coordinator at 202–912–7212, and emails to Brenda_Hudgens_Williams@blm.gov. All protests, including the follow-up letter to emails or faxes, must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate address as set forth in the ADDRESSES section above. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware that your entire protest—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your letter to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10 43 CFR 1610.2 and 1610.5. Edward W. Shepard, State Director, Oregon/Washington. [FR Doc. 2012–9502 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 23749 A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/ Washington State Office, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Hensley, (503) 808–6124, Branch of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. ADDRESSES: BILLING CODE 4310–33–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR [FR Doc. 2012–9570 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] Bureau of Land Management BILLING CODE 4310–33–P [LLOR957000–L63100000–HD0000: HAG12– 0168] Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/ Washington AGENCY: Timothy J. Moore, Acting Chief, Cadastral Surveyor of Oregon/ Washington. Bureau of Land Management, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLWO620000.L18200000.XH0000] Interior. Notice. Call for Nominations for Resource Advisory Councils The plats of survey of the following described lands are scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date of this publication. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN Oregon T. 12 S., R. 2 E., accepted April 6, 2012 T. 27 S., R. 12 W., accepted April 12, 2012 T. 39 S., R. 3 E., accepted April 12, 2012 T. 28 S., R. 11 W., accepted April 12, 2012 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice. The purpose of this notice is to reopen the request for public nominations for certain Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Resource Advisory Councils (RAC) that have member terms expiring this year. These RACs provide advice and recommendations to the BLM on land use planning and management of the National System of SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23747-23749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLORP0000.16100000.DQ0000 LXSS053H0000 HAG10-0234]


Notice of Availability of the Proposed John Day Basin Resource 
Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, Oregon.

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the Bureau 
of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Proposed Resource Management 
Plan (RMP)/Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the John Day 
Basin planning area and by this notice is announcing its availability.

DATES: The BLM planning regulations state that any person who meets the 
conditions as described in the regulations may protest the BLM's 
Proposed RMP/Final EIS. A person who meets the conditions and files a 
protest must file the protest within 30 days of the date that the 
Environmental

[[Page 23748]]

Protection Agency publishes its notice in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the John Day Basin Proposed RMP/Final EIS have 
been sent to affected Federal, State, and local government agencies and 
to other stakeholders, organizations, agencies and interested parties 
on the John Day Basin Resource Management Plan (RMP) mailing list. 
Copies of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS are available for public 
inspection at the Prineville Field Office during regular business hours 
(7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays) at 
3050 NE 3rd Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754. Interested persons may 
also review the Proposed RMP/Final EIS on the Internet at https://www.blm.gov/or/districts/prineville/plans/johndayrmp/jdbdocuments.php.
    All protests must be in writing and mailed to one of the following 
addresses:
    Regular Mail: Director (210), Attn: Brenda Hudgens-Williamsm, P.O. 
Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024-1383.
    Overnight Mail: Director (210), Attn: Brenda Hudgens-Williams, 20 M 
Street SE., Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Monte 
Kuk, John Day Basin RMP Project Leader, BLM Prineville Field Office, 
3050 NE 3rd Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754; telephone (541) 416-6700; 
email John_Day_Basin_RMP@blm.gov. Persons who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above 
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours 
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above 
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The planning area is located in parts of 
Sherman, Gilliam, Morrow, Umatilla, Grant, Wheeler, Jefferson, and 
Wasco Counties in the State of Oregon, covering 456,000 acres of BLM-
managed public land. Prior to this plan, the public land in this area 
was managed under three RMPs, which were completed in the 1980s: John 
Day RMP (Record of Decision signed 1985), Two Rivers RMP (1986), and 
Baker RMP (1989). The John Day RMP was amended in 1995. In 2001, the 
John Day River Plan amended portions of all three RMPs. New information 
and changed circumstances are cause for the BLM to update these plans. 
Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to: Acquisition of 
44,000 acres along North Fork John Day River, congressional designation 
of the Spring Basin Wilderness, heightened public interest in BLM 
management actions, increasing demand for recreation activities on 
public lands, and expanded scientific knowledge and information 
pertaining to the conservation of aquatic species.
    In February 2006, the BLM published a Notice of Intent to prepare 
an EIS and initiate revision/amendment of the existing RMPs. In March 
2006, the BLM hosted five public open houses across the planning area 
and in Portland, Oregon, to solicit public input on the issues to be 
addressed. The BLM published results of public input and an Analysis of 
the Management Situation in December 2006, followed by four public open 
houses across the planning area to solicit input on criteria to be used 
in development of alternatives. Throughout the planning process the BLM 
maintained updated wilderness characteristics inventories for all lands 
outside of areas designated as Wilderness or Wilderness Study Areas 
(WSA) to determine lands with wilderness characteristics (LWCs) in the 
planning area. After publication of the Draft RMP in October 2008, the 
BLM hosted a series of open houses throughout Oregon to present 
proposed actions in the Draft RMP and gather public comment. Public 
comments were accepted from October 30, 2008, to January 29, 2009. 
Comments were submitted via U.S. mail, direct email, email generated 
from the planning Web page, orally at open houses, and via telephone.
    The BLM also met regularly with the John Day/Snake Resource 
Advisory Council and with representatives of local, State, and other 
Federal government agencies, as well as tribal governments. 
Additionally, the BLM maintained a public Web site and mailed periodic 
newsletters with information on the plan's status.
    Comments on the Draft RMP/Draft EIS received from the public, John 
Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council, John Day Basin RMP Cooperating 
Agencies, and internal BLM review were considered and incorporated as 
appropriate into the proposed plan. Public comments resulted in the 
addition of clarifying text, but did not significantly change proposed 
land use plan decisions.
    The Proposed RMP/Final EIS analyzes five alternatives. Alternative 
1 (no action) would continue the current management goals, objectives, 
and direction specified in the existing RMPs. Alternative 2 (Proposed 
Resource Management Plan) would provide a mix of recreational 
opportunities, economic opportunities, and resource protection. Changes 
from Alternative 1 to 2 include:
    (a) Development of an interim road system and a process for 
developing a final transportation plan;
    (b) A reduction in areas ``open'' for motorized use off of roads;
    (c) Synthesized management direction to achieve forest and upland 
health goals while providing for timber and forage production and 
wildfire prevention;
    (d) Management direction for the North Fork John Day River lands 
that, in accordance with the land acquisition legislation, protects 
native fish, wildlife habitat, and public recreation;
    (e) Addition of an integrated strategy to address fish, water 
quality, and water quantity together;
    (f) Provides management protection of wilderness characteristics on 
19,442 of the 35,457 acres identified as Lands with Wilderness 
Characteristics, and a determination that management for other resource 
considerations is more appropriate on the remaining 16,015 acres;
    (g) Use of ``appropriate response'' rather than full suppression of 
all wildfires;
    (h) A process for addressing permit/lease relinquishment for 
grazing allotments; and
    (i) Wild and Scenic River suitability recommendation for 37 miles 
of the North Fork River.
    Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 are similar to Alternative 2 in most 
instances, but provide variation in the amount of roadway open for 
motorized travel, the number of areas open to off-road motorized use, 
the amount of LWC protected, the number and classifications of river 
segments deemed suitable for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic 
River System, and the number of acres where livestock grazing is 
permitted.
    The BLM Proposed RMP (Alternative 2) and Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 
(the Action Alternatives) propose immediate designation of five new 
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), totaling 62,407 acres. 
This total includes the 1,153-acre expansion of the existing Horn Butte 
ACEC.
    The largest of the new proposed ACECs is the 38,168-acre John Day 
Paleontological ACEC that would complement the adjacent John Day Fossil 
Beds National Monument and partially overlap the existing Sutton 
Mountain WSA. Resource use limitations associated with designation of 
this ACEC where it overlaps the WSA would include closure to salable, 
locatable and leasable minerals, a No Surface Occupancy (NSO) 
stipulation

[[Page 23749]]

for energy and communication site development, exclusion from rights-
of-way, management to Visual Resource Management Class II (VRM II) 
standards, and limiting vehicle use to designated roads and trails. Use 
limitations associated with this ACEC where it does not overlap with 
the Sutton Mountain WSA would be similar except for an NSO stipulation 
for mineral leasing, and other special stipulations for developments 
for energy, communication sites, and rights-of-way. Other proposed 
ACECs include the 6,639-acre Black Canyon RNA/ACEC, which would protect 
several sensitive plants and unique plant communities. Use limitations 
for this proposed ACEC include exclusion of livestock grazing, closure 
to off-highway motorized vehicles, an NSO stipulation for mineral 
leasing, closure to salable mineral, energy and communication site 
development, and exclusion of rights-of-way. The proposed plan would 
also add 1,153 acres to the existing 5,999-acre Horn Butte ACEC to 
protect Washington ground squirrel habitat. Use limitations for the 
expanded Horn Butte ACEC include management to VRM II standards, 
prohibition of mechanical noxious weed control in Fourmile Canyon, an 
NSO stipulation for mineral leasing, closure to salable minerals and 
energy and communication site development, and exclusion of rights-of-
way. Also proposed is the addition of the North Fork John Day River 
(16,837 acres), Armstrong Canyon (3,885 acres) and Ferry Canyon (2,364 
acres) ACECs to protect visual resource values. Use limitations include 
management to VRM II standards, NSO stipulation for mineral leasing, 
closure to communication site development, and exclusion of rights-of-
way. The proposed plan also eliminates the existing Spanish Gulch ACEC 
(333 acres). In the event that Congress releases any of the three WSAs 
along the lower John Day River (Lower John Day, North Pole Ridge, and 
Thirtymile) from WSA status, the released lands would be designated as 
ACECs to preserve scenic and other values. Use limitations would 
include management to VRM II standards, NSO stipulation for mineral 
leasing and closure to salable minerals, closure to energy and 
communication site development, and exclusion of rights-of-way (except 
for the existing PGE pipeline right-of-way). For more detailed 
information on each ACEC proposal, see the Special Designations section 
in the Proposed RMP/Final EIS.
    Instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM 
regarding the Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found in the ``Dear 
Reader'' letter of the John Day Basin Proposed RMP/Final EIS and at 43 
CFR 1610.5-2. Emailed and faxed protests will not be accepted as valid 
protests unless the protesting party also provides the original letter 
by either regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the 
protest period. Under these conditions, the BLM will consider the 
emailed or faxed protest as an advanced copy and it will receive full 
consideration. If you wish to provide the BLM with such advance 
notification, please direct faxed protests to the attention of the BLM 
protest coordinator at 202-912-7212, and emails to Brenda_Hudgens_Williams@blm.gov. All protests, including the follow-up letter to 
emails or faxes, must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate 
address as set forth in the ADDRESSES section above.
    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your protest, you should be 
aware that your entire protest--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your letter to withhold your personal identifying information 
from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

    Authority:  40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10 43 CFR 1610.2 and 1610.5.

Edward W. Shepard,
State Director, Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 2012-9502 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.