Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, a Final Section 4(f) Evaluation, and a Draft General Conformity Determination for the California High-Speed Train System Merced to Fresno Section, 23802-23803 [2012-9491]

Download as PDF 23802 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement, a Final Section 4(f) Evaluation, and a Draft General Conformity Determination for the California HighSpeed Train System Merced to Fresno Section Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), United States Department of Transportation (DOT). AGENCY: ACTION: Notice. FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that FRA is issuing a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Final 4(f) Evaluation for the California High-Speed Train (HST) System Merced to Fresno Section (Project). FRA is also making a Draft General Conformity Determination for the Project available for public review and comment. FRA is the lead Federal agency and the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) is the lead state agency for the environmental review process. The agencies have prepared the Final EIS consistent with federal law and also to serve as an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) served as Cooperating Agencies for the preparation of the EIS. SUMMARY: The Final EIS and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation are being made available to the public for a 30-day waiting period according to 40 CFR 1506.10 prior to final FRA action. The waiting period commences on the date the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s notice of availability is published in the Federal Register. Written comments on the Draft Conformity Determination for the California HST Project Merced to Fresno Section may be sent by May 29, 2012, to Mr. David Valenstein at the contact address below. DATES: Copies of the Final EIS, Final Section 4(f) Evaluation, and Draft General Conformity Determination are available online at the FRA’s Web site: https://www.fra.dot.gov and the Authority’s Web site: https:// www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov and the Authority’s offices at 770 L Street, Suite 800, Sacramento, CA; they are also available for viewing at the following locations in or near the Project area: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ADDRESSES: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:17 Apr 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 • Fresno County Public Library, Central Branch, 2420 Mariposa Street, Fresno, CA 93721 • Madera County Library, 121 North G Street, Madera, CA 93637 • Chowchilla Branch Library (Merced County Library), 300 Kings Avenue, Chowchilla, CA 93610 • Merced Community Senior Center, 755 West 15th Street, Merced, CA 95340 • Merced County Library, 2100 O Street, Merced, CA 95340 • Galilee Missionary Baptist Church, 22941 Fairmead Boulevard, Chowchilla, CA 93610 • Le Grand Branch Library, 12949 Le Grand Road, Le Grand, CA 95333 • Lao Family Community (Executive Summary in Hmong), 855 W 15th Street, Merced, CA 95340–5801 • Madera Ranchos Branch Library, 37167 Avenue 12, Suite 4C, Madera, CA 95636 • Merced County Los Manos Branch Library, 1312 South Seventh Street, Los Banos, CA 93635 • Atwater Branch Library, 1600 Third Street, Atwater, CA 95301–3607 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Valenstein, Chief, Environment and Systems Planning Division, Office of Railroad Policy and Development, Federal Railroad Administration, U.S., Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., MS–20, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: 202– 493–6368). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Once completed, the California HST system will provide intercity, high-speed passenger rail service on more than 800 miles of tracks throughout California, connecting the major population centers of Sacramento, the San Francisco Bay Area, the Central Valley, Los Angeles, the Inland Empire, Orange County, and San Diego. It will use state-of-the-art, electrically powered, high-speed, steelwheel-on-steel-rail technology, including contemporary safety, signaling, and automated train-control systems, with trains capable of operating up to 220 miles per hour (mph) over a fully graded-separated, dedicated double track alignment. The HST System is comprised of multiple sections, one of which is the Merced to Fresno section analyzed in the Final EIS. The Final EIS describes the potential environmental impacts, both adverse and beneficial, of the Project, identifies appropriate measures to mitigate adverse impacts, and identifies the agencies’ preferred alternative. The approximately 65-mile-long Merced to Fresno Section is an essential part of the PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 statewide HST System. The Merced to Fresno Section is the location of the connection between the Bay Area and Sacramento branches of the HST System; it will provide Merced and Fresno access to a new transportation mode and will contribute to increased mobility throughout California. This project-level EIS tiers off of the Statewide Program EIS published in 2005 and the Bay area to Central Valley Program EIS published in 2008 and builds on the earlier decisions and Program EISs. In August 2011, FRA issued a Draft EIS and circulated the document for a 60-day public and agency review and comment period. The Draft EIS analyzed a No Action Alternative and various Action Alternatives for the construction and operation of the California HST Project Merced to Fresno Section including alignment alternatives and station locations. FRA and the Authority convened three public hearings on the Draft EIS, held in Merced, Madera, and Fresno on September 14, September 15, and September 20, 2011, respectively. Consistent with the provisions of Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500 et seq.), FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts (Environmental Procedures) (64 FR 28545, May 26, 1999), the Final EIS evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with Action Alternatives and the No Action Alternative, identifies appropriate mitigation measures to minimize the potential environmental impacts, and identifies a preferred alternative. The FRA, the Authority, and Cooperating Agencies considered the entire record and the potential for environmental impact in selecting the Preferred Alternative. Additionally, the Final EIS includes FRA’s Final Section 4(f) Evaluation which provides the supporting analysis to comply with 49 U.S.C. 303 and FRA’s Environmental Procedures. FRA is also issuing a Draft General Conformity Determination for public and agency comment. The Draft General Conformity Determination has been prepared pursuant to 40 CFR part 93, subpart B, which establishes the process for complying with the general conformity requirements of the Clean Air Act. Consistent with those regulations, FRA is making the Draft Conformity Determination available for public review and comment. Analysis of the Project’s potential emissions found that construction period emissions E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices would exceed the General Conformity de minimis threshold for Nitrogen Dioxide (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC), a precursor for ozone. However, operation of the Project would result in an overall reduction of regional emissions of all applicable air pollutants and would not cause a localized exceedance of an air quality standard. Conformance of the Project will be accomplished through a Voluntary Emissions Reduction Agreement which will offset the NOx and VOC emissions consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2012. Joseph C. Szabo, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2012–9491 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–06–P S.P No. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Actions on Special Permit Applications Pipeline And Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of actions on Special Permit Applications. AGENCY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of Transportation’s Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107, Subpart B), notice is hereby given of the actions on special permits applications in SUMMARY: Applicant Regulation(s) 23803 (February to March 2012). The mode of transportation involved are identified by a number in the ‘‘Nature of Application’’ portion of the table below as follows: 1—Motor vehicle, 2—Rail freight, 3—Cargo vessel, 4—Cargo aircraft only, 5—Passenger-carrying aircraft. Application numbers prefixed by the letters EE represent applications for Emergency Special Permits. It should be noted that some of the sections cited were those in effect at the time certain special permits were issued. Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on April 13, 2012. Donald Burger, Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch. Nature of special permit thereof MODIFICATION SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED 8826–M ........ Phoenix Air Group, Inc. Cartersville, GA. 14909–M ...... Lake Clark Air, Inc. Port Alsworth, AK. 10656–M ...... Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. Frankfort, KY. Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. Frankfort, KY. 11406–M ...... 11670–M ...... 14193–M ...... 10646–M ...... 14457–M ...... 14808–M ...... 49 CFR 172.101; 172.204(c)(3); 173.27; 175.30(a)(1); 175.320(b). 49 CFR 173.304(f) .................. Schlumberger Oilfield UK Plc Dyce, Aberdeen Scotland, Ab. Honeywell International, Inc. Morristown, NJ. Schlumberger Technologies Corporation Sugar Land, TX. Amtrol Alfa Metalomecanica SA Portugal. Amtrol, Inc. West Warwick, RI 49 CFR 172.203(d); Part 172, Subparts C, D, E, F, G. 49 CFR Part 172, Subparts, C, D, E, F, G, H; Part 173, Subparts B, I; 173.22(a)(1); Part 174, Subpart K; 177.842. 49 CFR 178.36 ........................ 49 CFR 173.313 ...................... 49 CFR 173.302 ...................... 49 CFR 173.304a(a)(1) ........... 15036–M ...... UTLX Manufacturing, Incorporated Alexandria, LA. 14940–M ...... Crown Aerosol Packaging Philadelphia, PA. Carleton Technologies, Pressure Technology Division Westminster, MD. Chlorine Service Company Kingwood, TX. Orbital Sciences Corporation Mojave, CA. 49 CFR 178.51(b), (f)(1) and (2) and (g). 49 CFR 173.31(e)(2)(ii), 173.244(a)(2), 173.314, 179.100, 179.101, 179.102– 3, 179.15(b) and 179.16. 49 CFR 173.306 ...................... 49 CFR 173.302(a)(1), 173.304(a), 175.3 and 180.205. 49 CFR 178.245–1(a) ............. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 13381–M ...... 14616–M ...... 11215–M ...... VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:17 Apr 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 49 CFR Part 172, Subparts C, D; 172.101, Special Provision 109. PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 To modify the special to reflect the current statutes and regulations changes. To reissue the special permit originally issued on an emergency basis authorizing the transportation in commerce of compressed oxygen without rigid outer packaging when no other means of transportation exist. To modify the special permit add 49 CFR Part 172 Subpart I as it pertains to security plans to the list of regulations exempted in paragraph 4. To modify the special permit add 49 CFR Part 172 Subpart I as it pertains to security plans to the list of regulations exempted in paragraph 4. To modify the exemption to authorize the use of a newly designed non-DOT specification oil well sampling cylinder for the transportation of Division 2.1 materials. To reissue the exemption originally issued on an emergency basis for the transportation of non-DOT specification IMO Type 5 portable tanks, mounted in an ISO frame, containing certain Division 2.2 and 2.3 materials. To modify the special permit to authorize an additional material in the construction of non-DOT specification cylinders. To modify the special permit to extend the external visual inspection to every five (5) years. To modify the special permit to authorize a longer time between requalification testing. To modify the special permit to authorize the manufacture, marking, sale and use of three additional non-DOT specification tank cars for transportation of chlorine and certain other materials toxic by inhalation. To modify the special permit to authorize rail freight and cargo vessel as additional modes of transportation To modify the special permit to authorize an extended testing time period for cylinders which are past their retest date but are not empty. To modify the special permit to correct pressure ranges to bring it in line with other special permits issued. To modify the special permit to add a Class 9 material. E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23802-23803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9491]



[[Page 23802]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Report/
Environmental Impact Statement, a Final Section 4(f) Evaluation, and a 
Draft General Conformity Determination for the California High-Speed 
Train System Merced to Fresno Section

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), United States Department 
of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that FRA is 
issuing a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Final 4(f) 
Evaluation for the California High-Speed Train (HST) System Merced to 
Fresno Section (Project). FRA is also making a Draft General Conformity 
Determination for the Project available for public review and comment. 
FRA is the lead Federal agency and the California High-Speed Rail 
Authority (Authority) is the lead state agency for the environmental 
review process. The agencies have prepared the Final EIS consistent 
with federal law and also to serve as an Environmental Impact Report 
(EIR) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act 
(CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 
and the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) served as Cooperating Agencies for 
the preparation of the EIS.

DATES: The Final EIS and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation are being made 
available to the public for a 30-day waiting period according to 40 CFR 
1506.10 prior to final FRA action. The waiting period commences on the 
date the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's notice of availability 
is published in the Federal Register. Written comments on the Draft 
Conformity Determination for the California HST Project Merced to 
Fresno Section may be sent by May 29, 2012, to Mr. David Valenstein at 
the contact address below.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final EIS, Final Section 4(f) Evaluation, and 
Draft General Conformity Determination are available online at the 
FRA's Web site: https://www.fra.dot.gov and the Authority's Web site: 
https://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov and the Authority's offices at 770 L 
Street, Suite 800, Sacramento, CA; they are also available for viewing 
at the following locations in or near the Project area:

 Fresno County Public Library, Central Branch, 2420 Mariposa 
Street, Fresno, CA 93721
 Madera County Library, 121 North G Street, Madera, CA 93637
 Chowchilla Branch Library (Merced County Library), 300 Kings 
Avenue, Chowchilla, CA 93610
 Merced Community Senior Center, 755 West 15th Street, Merced, 
CA 95340
 Merced County Library, 2100 O Street, Merced, CA 95340
 Galilee Missionary Baptist Church, 22941 Fairmead Boulevard, 
Chowchilla, CA 93610
 Le Grand Branch Library, 12949 Le Grand Road, Le Grand, CA 
95333
 Lao Family Community (Executive Summary in Hmong), 855 W 15th 
Street, Merced, CA 95340-5801
 Madera Ranchos Branch Library, 37167 Avenue 12, Suite 4C, 
Madera, CA 95636
 Merced County Los Manos Branch Library, 1312 South Seventh 
Street, Los Banos, CA 93635
 Atwater Branch Library, 1600 Third Street, Atwater, CA 95301-
3607

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Valenstein, Chief, 
Environment and Systems Planning Division, Office of Railroad Policy 
and Development, Federal Railroad Administration, U.S., Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., MS-20, Washington, DC 20590 
(telephone: 202-493-6368).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Once completed, the California HST system 
will provide intercity, high-speed passenger rail service on more than 
800 miles of tracks throughout California, connecting the major 
population centers of Sacramento, the San Francisco Bay Area, the 
Central Valley, Los Angeles, the Inland Empire, Orange County, and San 
Diego. It will use state-of-the-art, electrically powered, high-speed, 
steel-wheel-on-steel-rail technology, including contemporary safety, 
signaling, and automated train-control systems, with trains capable of 
operating up to 220 miles per hour (mph) over a fully graded-separated, 
dedicated double track alignment. The HST System is comprised of 
multiple sections, one of which is the Merced to Fresno section 
analyzed in the Final EIS.
    The Final EIS describes the potential environmental impacts, both 
adverse and beneficial, of the Project, identifies appropriate measures 
to mitigate adverse impacts, and identifies the agencies' preferred 
alternative. The approximately 65-mile-long Merced to Fresno Section is 
an essential part of the statewide HST System. The Merced to Fresno 
Section is the location of the connection between the Bay Area and 
Sacramento branches of the HST System; it will provide Merced and 
Fresno access to a new transportation mode and will contribute to 
increased mobility throughout California. This project-level EIS tiers 
off of the Statewide Program EIS published in 2005 and the Bay area to 
Central Valley Program EIS published in 2008 and builds on the earlier 
decisions and Program EISs.
    In August 2011, FRA issued a Draft EIS and circulated the document 
for a 60-day public and agency review and comment period. The Draft EIS 
analyzed a No Action Alternative and various Action Alternatives for 
the construction and operation of the California HST Project Merced to 
Fresno Section including alignment alternatives and station locations. 
FRA and the Authority convened three public hearings on the Draft EIS, 
held in Merced, Madera, and Fresno on September 14, September 15, and 
September 20, 2011, respectively.
    Consistent with the provisions of Section 102(2)(c) of the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the 
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA 
(40 CFR parts 1500 et seq.), FRA's Procedures for Considering 
Environmental Impacts (Environmental Procedures) (64 FR 28545, May 26, 
1999), the Final EIS evaluates the potential environmental effects 
associated with Action Alternatives and the No Action Alternative, 
identifies appropriate mitigation measures to minimize the potential 
environmental impacts, and identifies a preferred alternative. The FRA, 
the Authority, and Cooperating Agencies considered the entire record 
and the potential for environmental impact in selecting the Preferred 
Alternative. Additionally, the Final EIS includes FRA's Final Section 
4(f) Evaluation which provides the supporting analysis to comply with 
49 U.S.C. 303 and FRA's Environmental Procedures.
    FRA is also issuing a Draft General Conformity Determination for 
public and agency comment. The Draft General Conformity Determination 
has been prepared pursuant to 40 CFR part 93, subpart B, which 
establishes the process for complying with the general conformity 
requirements of the Clean Air Act. Consistent with those regulations, 
FRA is making the Draft Conformity Determination available for public 
review and comment. Analysis of the Project's potential emissions found 
that construction period emissions

[[Page 23803]]

would exceed the General Conformity de minimis threshold for Nitrogen 
Dioxide (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC), a precursor for 
ozone. However, operation of the Project would result in an overall 
reduction of regional emissions of all applicable air pollutants and 
would not cause a localized exceedance of an air quality standard. 
Conformance of the Project will be accomplished through a Voluntary 
Emissions Reduction Agreement which will offset the NOx and VOC 
emissions consistent with applicable regulatory requirements.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2012.
Joseph C. Szabo,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-9491 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.