State of Nevada; Regional Haze State and Federal Implementation Plans; BART Determination for Reid Gardner Generating Station, 23191-23192 [2012-9438]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
State’s ability to provide for air quality
and modeling, along with analysis of the
associated data, related to the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS when necessary.
13. 110(a)(2)(L) Permitting fees:
Florida addresses the review of
construction permits as previously
discussed in 110(a)(2)(C). Permitting
fees in Florida are collected through the
State’s federally-approved title V fees
program, according to State regulation
403.087(6)(a) Permit Fees. EPA has
made the preliminary determination
that Florida’s SIP and practices
adequately provide for permitting fees
related to the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS when necessary.
14. 110(a)(2)(M) Consultation/
participation by affected local entities:
Chapter 62–204, Air Pollution Control
Provisions, requires that SIPs be
submitted in accordance with 40 CFR
part 51, Subpart F, for permitting
purposes. Florida statute 403.061(21)
authorizes DEP to ‘‘[a]dvise, consult,
cooperate and enter into agreements
with other agencies of the state, the
Federal Government, other states,
interstate agencies, groups, political
subdivisions, and industries affected by
the provisions of this act, rules, or
policies of the department.’’
Furthermore, DEP has demonstrated
consultation with, and participation by,
affected local entities through its work
with local political subdivisions during
the developing of its Transportation
Conformity SIP and Regional Haze
Implementation Plan. EPA has made the
preliminary determination that Florida’s
SIP and practices adequately
demonstrate consultation with affected
local entities related to the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS when necessary.
V. Proposed Action
As described above, EPA has
addressed the elements of the CAA
110(a)(1) and (2) SIP requirements
pursuant to EPA’s October 2, 2007,
guidance to ensure that the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS are implemented,
enforced, and maintained in Florida.
EPA is now proposing four related
actions on Florida’s December 13, 2007,
submission as supplemented on April
18, 2008. First, EPA is proposing to
approve Florida’s infrastructure
submission for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, with the specific exceptions as
follows. Second, EPA is proposing a FIP
to address 110(a)(G) for the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard. EPA notes that the
proposed FIP will not be necessary if
EPA receives, and is able to take action
on, a SIP revision to address the
110(a)(2)(G) requirements prior to the
Agency’s obligation to take final action
per the terms of a settlement agreement
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Apr 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
23191
related to this action. Third, EPA is
proposing to disapprove Florida’s
submission for portions of elements
110(a)(2)(C) and 110(a)(2)(J) related to
the regulation of GHG emissions.
Fourth, EPA is proposing to
conditionally approve sub-element
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) related to section 128 of
the CAA.
In addition, this proposed rule does not
have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 30, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012–9225 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R9–OAR–2011–0130; FRL–9661–4]
State of Nevada; Regional Haze State
and Federal Implementation Plans;
BART Determination for Reid Gardner
Generating Station
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Announcement of public
hearing.
AGENCY:
EPA is holding a public
hearing on May 3, 2012 for the proposed
rule, ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of
Air Quality Implementation Plans; State
of Nevada; Regional Haze State and
Federal Implementation Plans; BART
Determination for Reid Gardner
Generating Station.’’
DATES: The public hearing will be held
on May 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: We will hold a public
hearing at Moapa Valley Empowerment
High School, 2400 St. Joseph Street,
Overton, Nevada 89040. The hearing
will begin at 6:30 p.m. and continue
until 8:30 p.m., if necessary. An open
house will precede the public hearing at
the same location from 5 p.m.–6 p.m.
The EPA Region 9 Web site for the
rulemaking, which includes the
proposal and information about the
public hearing, is at https://
www.epa.gov/region9/air/actions/
nv.html#reid.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about the public
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM
18APP1
23192
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
hearings, please contact Thomas Webb,
EPA Region IX at 415–947–4139, or
Webb.Thomas@epa.gov. If you require a
reasonable accommodation, please
contact Terisa Williams, EPA Region IX
Reasonable Accommodations
Coordinator at 415–972–3829, or
Williams.Terisa@epa.gov.
The
public hearing is to provide the public
with an opportunity to present oral
comments regarding a proposed
Regional Haze State and Federal
Implementation Plans for the BART
Determination at the Reid Gardner
Generating Station in the State of
Nevada. The BART determinations
require the Reid Gardner Generating
Station to meet an emissions limit for
oxides of nitrogen at Units 1, 2 and 3 of
0.20 lbs/MMBtu on a 30-day rolling
average.
Public hearing: The proposed rule for
which EPA will hold the public hearing
is available at https://www.epa.gov/
region9/air/actions/nv.html#reid and
also in the docket identified below. The
public hearing will provide interested
parties the opportunity to present data,
views, or arguments concerning the
proposal. EPA may ask clarifying
questions during the oral presentations,
but will not respond to the
presentations at that time. We will
consider written statements and
supporting information submitted
during the comment period with the
same weight as any oral comments and
supporting information presented at the
public hearing.
At the public hearing, the hearing
officer may limit the time available for
each commenter to address the proposal
to five minutes or less if the hearing
officer determines it is appropriate. We
will not provide equipment for
commenters to show overhead slides or
make computerized slide presentations.
Any person may provide written or oral
comments and data pertaining to our
proposal at the public hearing. We will
include verbatim transcripts, in English,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of the hearing and written statements in
the rulemaking docket.
EPA has established a docket for the
proposed rule under Docket ID No.
EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0130 (available at
https://www.regulations.gov).
Dated: April 11, 2012.
Deborah Jordan,
Air Division Director, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012–9438 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0243; FRL–9659–9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Northern Sierra
and Sacramento Metropolitan Air
Quality Management Districts
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Northern Sierra Air
Quality Management District
(NSAQMD) and Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District (SMAQMD) portions of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern negative
declarations for volatile organic
compound (VOC) source categories for
the NSAQMD and SMAQMD. We are
proposing to approve these negative
declarations under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by May 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2012–0243, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
SUMMARY:
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
This
proposal addresses the following
negative declarations listed in Table I:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Local agency
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
NSAQMD
SMAQMD
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Title
Adopted
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials ....................................................................
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives ............................................................................
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings ...............................................
Industrial Cleaning Solvents ........................................................................................
Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing .................................................
Flexible Package Printing ............................................................................................
Flat Wood Paneling Coatings .....................................................................................
Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings ...................................................................................
Large Appliance Coatings ...........................................................................................
Metal Furniture Coatings .............................................................................................
Coating Operations at Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations ...............
16:22 Apr 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM
18APP1
04/25/11
04/25/11
04/25/11
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
10/27/11
Submitted
05/17/11
05/17/11
05/17/11
08/14/08
08/14/08
08/14/08
08/14/08
08/14/08
08/14/08
08/14/08
01/12/12
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23191-23192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9438]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R9-OAR-2011-0130; FRL-9661-4]
State of Nevada; Regional Haze State and Federal Implementation
Plans; BART Determination for Reid Gardner Generating Station
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Announcement of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is holding a public hearing on May 3, 2012 for the
proposed rule, ``Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plans; State of Nevada; Regional Haze State and Federal
Implementation Plans; BART Determination for Reid Gardner Generating
Station.''
DATES: The public hearing will be held on May 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: We will hold a public hearing at Moapa Valley Empowerment
High School, 2400 St. Joseph Street, Overton, Nevada 89040. The hearing
will begin at 6:30 p.m. and continue until 8:30 p.m., if necessary. An
open house will precede the public hearing at the same location from 5
p.m.-6 p.m. The EPA Region 9 Web site for the rulemaking, which
includes the proposal and information about the public hearing, is at
https://www.epa.gov/region9/air/actions/nv.html#reid.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about the public
[[Page 23192]]
hearings, please contact Thomas Webb, EPA Region IX at 415-947-4139, or
Webb.Thomas@epa.gov. If you require a reasonable accommodation, please
contact Terisa Williams, EPA Region IX Reasonable Accommodations
Coordinator at 415-972-3829, or Williams.Terisa@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public hearing is to provide the public
with an opportunity to present oral comments regarding a proposed
Regional Haze State and Federal Implementation Plans for the BART
Determination at the Reid Gardner Generating Station in the State of
Nevada. The BART determinations require the Reid Gardner Generating
Station to meet an emissions limit for oxides of nitrogen at Units 1, 2
and 3 of 0.20 lbs/MMBtu on a 30-day rolling average.
Public hearing: The proposed rule for which EPA will hold the
public hearing is available at https://www.epa.gov/region9/air/actions/nv.html#reid and also in the docket identified below. The public
hearing will provide interested parties the opportunity to present
data, views, or arguments concerning the proposal. EPA may ask
clarifying questions during the oral presentations, but will not
respond to the presentations at that time. We will consider written
statements and supporting information submitted during the comment
period with the same weight as any oral comments and supporting
information presented at the public hearing.
At the public hearing, the hearing officer may limit the time
available for each commenter to address the proposal to five minutes or
less if the hearing officer determines it is appropriate. We will not
provide equipment for commenters to show overhead slides or make
computerized slide presentations. Any person may provide written or
oral comments and data pertaining to our proposal at the public
hearing. We will include verbatim transcripts, in English, of the
hearing and written statements in the rulemaking docket.
EPA has established a docket for the proposed rule under Docket ID
No. EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0130 (available at https://www.regulations.gov).
Dated: April 11, 2012.
Deborah Jordan,
Air Division Director, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012-9438 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P