VA Acquisition Regulation: Electronic Submission of Payment Requests, 23204-23208 [2012-9269]
Download as PDF
23204
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
48 CFR Parts 832 and 852
RIN 2900–AN97
VA Acquisition Regulation: Electronic
Submission of Payment Requests
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
acquisition regulations to require
contractors to submit payment requests
in electronic form in order to enhance
customer service, departmental
productivity, and adoption of
innovative information technology,
including the appropriate use of
commercial best practices.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before June 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AN97—VA Acquisition Regulation:
Electronic Submission of Payment
Requests.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment.
(This is not a toll free number.) In
addition, during the comment period,
comments are available online through
the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Reid, Procurement Policy Service
(003A2A), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–7178.
(This is not a toll free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7,
2009, VA published a notice, in the
Federal Register at 74 FR 32223, of a
class deviation to Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) 32.905 (48 CFR
32.905), which added an interim
electronic invoicing clause in the VA
Acquisition Regulation (VAAR). The
interim clause strongly encourages
contractors to voluntarily submit
invoices electronically, which VA
determined would improve the accuracy
and efficiency of payment processing.
Under this interim clause, contractors
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Apr 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
who choose to use electronic invoicing
have three options to submit payment
requests in electronic form: (1)
Electronic Invoice Presentment and
Payment System; (2) American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) X12
electronic data interchange (EDI)
formats; or (3) another electronic form
as prescribed by the contract
administration office and the designated
agency office. VA’s notice regarding
interim, optional electronic invoicing
noted VA intended to initiate noticeand-comment rulemaking to amend the
VAAR to make electronic invoicing
mandatory.
Mandatory electronic invoice
submission is necessary to enhance
compliance and/or consistency with a
long history of rules and regulations
governing the accuracy, timeliness, and
cost-effectiveness of the Federal
Government’s payment process.
In 1982, Congress enacted the Prompt
Payment Act (‘‘Act’’), Public Law 97–
177, to require Federal agencies to pay
their bills on a timely basis, to pay
interest penalties when payments are
made late, and to take discounts only
when payments are made by the
discount date. The Act, as amended, is
found at 31 U.S.C. Chapter 39. To
implement the Act, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) issued
Circular A–125 (‘‘Prompt Payment ’’) in
August 1982 (47 FR 37321). In response
to changes to the Act that Congress
made in the Prompt Payment Act
Amendments of 1988, Public Law 100–
496, OMB revised Circular A–125 in
December 1989 (54 FR 52700). On June
17, 1998, OMB requested public
comments on proposed revisions to
Circular A–125 (63 FR 33000). The
Circular was updated to reflect the
increased use of electronic commerce in
the Federal Government and in the
private sector, including electronic
financial systems and electronic funds
transfer. OMB responded to the
comments that were received on the
proposed revisions, issued final
revisions to its Prompt Payment
Circular, and codified these revisions in
new part 1315 of 5 CFR (64 FR 52580).
With the incorporation of the Prompt
Payment rules into 5 CFR part 1315,
OMB rescinded Circular A–125.
The prompt payment rules at 5 CFR
part 1315 address the increased use of
electronic commercial financial systems
and promote the use of government
credit cards and accelerated payment
methods. This proposed rule enhances
compliance with 5 CFR part 1315 by
requiring the use of electronic
commerce. Electronic invoice
submission replaces payment delays
from traditional postal delivery with
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
immediate electronic transmission of
data. As a result, VA’s ability to make
timely payments, reduce interest
penalties on late payments, and increase
the dollar amount of discounts realized
from prompt payment is improved.
FAR subpart 32.9 (48 CFR part 32.9)
prescribes policies, procedures, and
clauses for implementing the prompt
payment regulations at 5 CFR part 1315.
In relevant part, FAR 32.903 requires
federal agencies to establish policies
and procedures necessary to implement
FAR subpart 32.9, and provides the
agencies the latitude to prescribe
additional standards for establishing
invoice payment due dates necessary to
support agency programs and foster
prompt payment to contractors as well
as the latitude to adopt different
payment procedures in order to
accommodate unique circumstances,
provided that such procedures are
consistent with the policies in OMB’s
prompt payment regulations. This
proposed rule enhances compliance
with FAR 32.903 by requiring electronic
invoice submission. Electronic invoice
submission replaces payment delays
from traditional postal delivery with
immediate electronic transmission of
data. By eliminating delays associated
with traditional processing, electronic
submission fosters the prompt payment
of invoices to contractors.
FAR 32.905(b)(1) defines the specific
data elements that must be included on
a proper invoice. Electronic invoice
submission ensures invoice validity by
employing automated data validation.
Automated data validation enforces data
element accuracy and completeness.
Invalid invoices are immediately
returned to the contractor for correction
without the delays associated with
traditional postal delivery.
VA’s proposed requirement for
contractors to use electronic invoicing
when submitting payment requests
supports several of the principal
purposes stated in section 2 of the
E-Government Act of 2002, Public Law
107–347, including promoting the use of
the Internet and other information
technologies to provide increased
opportunities for citizen participation in
Government, improving the ability of
the Government to achieve agency
missions and program performance
goals, reducing costs and burdens for
businesses and other Government
entities, and transforming agency
operations by utilizing, where
appropriate, best practices from public
and private sector organizations.
Further, section 202(b)(3) of the EGovernment Act of 2002 requires
Federal agencies to develop
performance measures that demonstrate
E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM
18APP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
how electronic government enables
progress towards agency objectives,
strategic goals, and statutory mandates,
and specifically directs agencies to
consider: (1) Customer service; (2)
agency productivity; and (3) the
adoption of innovative information
technology, including the appropriate
use of commercial best practices. VA
anticipates that this rulemaking
requiring contractors to use electronic
invoicing to submit payment requests
would reflect positively when rated
against the aforementioned performance
measures given that it would ensure
superior customer service, increase
agency productivity, and be consistent
with the longstanding best practice of
electronic invoicing and direct deposit
in the commercial marketplace.
The Improper Payments Information
Act of 2002, Public Law 107–300,
enacted on Nov. 26, 2002, as amended
by the Improper Payments Elimination
and Recovery Act of 2010 (IPERA),
Public Law 111–204, enacted on July 22,
2010, requires Federal agencies to
annually review the programs it
oversees and determine if those
programs and activities may be
susceptible to significant erroneous
payments. Section 2(h)(4) of IPERA
requires the head of each agency to
conduct a financial management
improvement program, consistent with
rules prescribed by the Director of OMB.
In conducting the program, the head of
the agency shall, as the first priority of
the program, address problems that
contribute directly to agency improper
payments and may seek to reduce errors
and waste in other agency programs and
operations.
Executive Order 13520 of November
20, 2009 (‘‘Reducing Improper
Payments’’) directed the Federal
Government to make every effort to
confirm that the right recipient is
receiving the right payment for the right
reason at the right time. This proposed
rule would address problems that
contribute to improper payments such
as data entry errors, manual processing
errors, incorrect vendor selection,
duplicate payments, and payment
delays while eliminating the waste
associated with traditional payment
processing.
Other Federal Government
departments and agencies have
implemented similar electronic invoice
submission requirements. In January
2004, the Department of Defense
updated the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to reflect the new electronic
invoicing mandate. DFARS 252.232–
7003 (48 CFR 252.232–7003) outlines
the electronic invoice submission
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Apr 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
process for contractor payments. In
2006, the U.S. Government
Accountability Office issued a report to
Congressional Committees entitled
‘‘DoD Payments to Small Businesses:
Implementation and Effective
Utilization of Electronic Invoicing
Could Further Reduce Late Payments’’
(GAO–06–358). The report confirmed
the effectiveness of electronic invoicing
in eliminating paper and redundant data
entry; improving data accuracy;
reducing the number of lost or
misplaced documents; and ultimately,
improving timely payments to
contractors.
The U.S. Department of the Interior
issued a special notice mandating
electronic submittal of invoices and
exchange of payment information to its
suppliers of goods and services
beginning in May 2011. The U.S.
Department of the Treasury mandated
electronic invoicing for its commercial
vendors by the end of fiscal year 2012.
VA proposes to amend the VAAR by
adding subpart 832.10 and clause
852.273–76 to implement mandatory
electronic invoicing as part of its
strategic plan to improve the
commercial vendor payment process.
The automated data validation, digital
transmission, and expedited payment
and processing would reduce the errors
inherent in a manual invoice processing
system, thereby reducing improper
payments. Expedited payment processes
would allow VA to take advantage of
prompt payment discounts offered by its
vendors thereby reducing the cost of
goods and services furnished VA while
simultaneously reducing the cost to
contractors of manual invoice
processing. As a result, VA would
achieve compliance and consistency
with all applicable laws governing the
invoice payment process and use of
information technologies.
This proposed amendment to the
VAAR is anticipated to reduce the errors
in the processing of contractor payments
by including automated invoice data
validation checks. VA’s electronic
invoicing system would check the
contractor-submitted invoice data
against contract invoice requirements
and automatically refer improper or
erroneous invoices back to the
contractor for immediate correction.
This would facilitate timely correction
of administrative errors and timely
payment of contractors when coupled
with the existing Electronic Funds
Transfer procedure (bank direct deposit)
in use by VA. Automated invoice data
validation checks would reduce the
manual processing burden and
consequent errors for both government
and contractor personnel and reduce the
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23205
risk of improper payment. These same
data validation processes would ensure
payment requests comply with
applicable laws. In addition, electronic
invoicing would expedite the payment
process, and thereby, permit VA to take
greater advantage of discounts afforded
by contractors for early payment. The
proposed benefits of electronic invoice
submission to the contractor community
would include speedier payments of
balances due, as well as reduced costs
due to the elimination of postage fees,
and related material and supply
expenses.
Currently, approximately 25 percent
of the vendor community submits
electronic payment requests to the VA
Financial Services Center using one of
two data transmission methods. Some
contractors use VA’s Electronic Invoice
Presentment and Payment System.
Other contractors use systems that rely
on the standard EDI transaction sets.
These methods of data transmission are
discussed in more detail below.
Under proposed VAAR 832.1003–1
and VAAR 852.273–76(c), electronic
invoices would be submitted by the
Internet using either: (1) VA’s Electronic
Invoice Presentation and Payment
System, or (2) any system that conforms
to the X12 EDI formats established by
the Accredited Standards Center (ASC)
and chartered by ANSI. These are the
same methods that many VA contractors
are voluntarily using under VA’s current
interim electronic invoicing clause. See
74 FR 32223. VA’s Electronic Invoice
Presentation and Payment System
allows invoice submission through two
methods. The first method is an
internet-based webform template that
expands the ability of smaller
contractors to utilize electronic
invoicing and allows a contractor to
directly upload invoice data that
automatically populates VA payment
systems. The second method directly
interfaces with the contractor’s billing
system and transmits invoice data to VA
payment systems. The U.S. ANSI X12 is
the predominant set of standards
defining the structure, format, and
content of business transactions
conducted through EDI. ANSI X12,
chartered more than 30 years ago,
develops and maintains EDI standards.
Access to VA’s Electronic Invoice
Presentation and Payment System
would be provided to contractors at no
cost.
As an alternative to using the VA
Electronic Invoice Presentation and
Payment System, proposed VAAR
832.1003–1(b) and VAAR 852.273–
76(c)(2) would also permit contractors
to submit electronic invoices using any
system that conforms to X12 EDI
E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM
18APP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
23206
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
formats established by ASC and
chartered by ANSI. This would allow
contractors some flexibility in deciding
how they want to communicate with
VA. For example, some contractors may
already have a system established that is
compatible with above-mentioned EDI
requirements in order to communicate
with other federal agencies. Those
contractors would be able to use that
same system to submit electronic
invoices to VA. Additionally, purchases
paid with a Government-wide
commercial purchase card are
considered to be an electronic
transaction for purposes of this rule, and
therefore no additional electronic
invoice submission is required.
In proposed VAAR 832.1003(b) and
VAAR 852.273–76(e), VA proposes to
include five exceptions to the
mandatory use of electronic invoicing
by contractors. VA proposes to allow
contracting officers to require
contractors to submit payment requests
by mail, through the United States
Postal Service, in the following
circumstances. First, contracting officers
may direct that contractors submit
invoicing by mail for awards that are
made to foreign vendors for work
performed outside the United States
because foreign vendors may lack
Internet access, familiarity with, or
ability to process an electronic invoice
with the standard commercial protocols
and methods in the proposed clause.
Second, contracting officers may direct
that contractors submit invoicing by
mail for classified contracts or
purchases when electronic submission
and processing of payment requests
could compromise the safeguarding of
classified or privacy information. In
such cases, the potential damage far
outweighs any efficiencies or benefits to
be gained by electronic processing.
Third, contracting officers may direct
that contractors submit invoicing by
mail for contracts awarded by
contracting officers in the conduct of
emergency operations, such as
responses to national emergencies
because such contracts may be
performed in areas and under
circumstances where Internet
availability and electronic invoicing are
not practical. Fourth, contracting
officers may direct that contractors
submit invoicing by mail for contracts
awarded by contracting officers for
solicitations or contracts in which the
designated agency office (DAO) is a VA
entity other than the VA Financial
Services Center in Austin, Texas. Fifth,
contracting officers may direct that
contractors submit invoicing by mail for
solicitations or contracts awarded by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Apr 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
contracting officers in cases where the
DAO does not have electronic invoicing
capability as described above.
Proposed VAAR 832.1003–2 would
require a contracting officer to insert the
proposed contract clause, VAAR
852.273–76, Electronic Submission of
Payment Requests, in all solicitations
and contracts. The proposed VAAR
852.273–76 would require the electronic
submission of invoices for contracts
unless the contracting officer
determines that one or more of the
exceptions at VAAR 832.1003(b)
applies. In cases where an exception
would apply, the contracting officer
would provide invoice mailing
instructions to the contractor. The VA
Financial Services Center would serve
as the DAO for commercial goods and
services purchased by VA, and would
be the only entity which operates the
electronic invoicing capabilities as
described above. Accordingly, VAAR
832.1003(b)(4) allows an exception to
the electronic invoice requirement for
solicitations or contracts in which the
DAO is a VA entity other than the VA
Financial Services Center in Austin,
Texas.
Public Comments
VA welcomes public comments on all
aspects of the proposed rule, however,
the Department is specifically interested
in feedback on the following areas: (1)
While VA’s voluntary compliance
program has been in effect for 3 years,
the VA is soliciting comment on
whether a final rule should include an
appropriate phase-in period for
electronic reporting requirements; (2)
The Department is seeking input on
whether the proposal would create any
significant burdens or transition costs
for contractors; if so what types of costs
or burdens might be imposed?; (3)
While VA generally believes that the
rapid pace of technological change has
eliminated many challenges to full
electronic commerce and internet access
for contractors e.g. both current and
potential federal government registrants
are already required to register in the
Centralized Contractor Registry (CCR),
the VA is interested in comments on
whether an exemption process should
be included in the final rule; and, (4)
Finally, VA is seeking comment on
whether the elimination of the ‘‘other
electronic means’’ option previously
available under VA’s voluntary program
would create any undue burdens for
contractors.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by OMB, as ‘‘any regulatory
action that is likely to result in a rule
that may: (1) Have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The
Secretary acknowledges that this
proposed rule could affect some small
entities; however, the economic impact
is not anticipated to be significant and
is expected to be outweighed by the
positive economic impact of the
proposed rule. Small entities should
realize a positive economic impact as a
result of electronic invoice submission
due to the avoidance of traditional
invoicing costs such as postage and
mailing supplies. VA’s proposed data
transmission methods for electronic
invoice submission would
accommodate all existing accounts
receivable/billing systems that
contractors are currently using to submit
electronic invoices to VA. As a result,
E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM
18APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
no additional hardware or software
purchases by contractors are necessary
to submit electronic invoices.
Additionally, the VA electronic invoice
payment and presentment system is
provided to all contractors free of
charge. No negative economic impact
has been reported by small entities
voluntarily using electronic invoice
submission in accordance with the
existing interim electronic invoicing
clause in the VAAR. In 2006, the U.S.
Government Accountability Office
issued a report to Congressional
Committees entitled ‘‘DoD Payments to
Small Businesses: Implementation and
Effective Utilization of Electronic
Invoicing Could Further Reduce Late
Payments’’ (GAO–06–358). The report
confirmed the effectiveness of electronic
invoicing in eliminating paper and
redundant data entry; improving data
accuracy; reducing the number of lost or
misplaced documents; and ultimately,
improving timely payments to small
businesses. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed rule is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
any additional information collection
requirements requiring approval of
OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. Collections
of information referenced in VAAR
Parts 832 and 852 have previously been
approved in accordance with OMB
prompt payment regulations at 5 CFR
Part 1315. See 64 FR 52580–01.
Collections relating to the submission
and payment of invoices are approved
under OMB Control Numbers 9000–
0070 and 0102, which govern the
submission of adequate documentation
to support contractor requests for
payment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule that may result in an expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any one year.
This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program
There is no Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance program number
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Apr 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
and title for the program in this
proposal.
23207
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on February 24, 2012, for
publication.
(c) Electronic form means an
automated system transmitting
information electronically according to
the accepted electronic data
transmission methods identified in
VAAR 832.1003–1. Facsimile, email,
and scanned documents are not
acceptable electronic forms for
submission of payment requests.
(d) Invoice payment has the meaning
given in FAR 32.001.
(e) Payment request means any
request for contract financing payment
or invoice payment submitted by a
contractor under a contract.
List of Subjects
832.1003
48 CFR Part 832
Government procurement.
(a) The contractor shall submit
payment requests in electronic form
unless directed by the contracting
officer to submit payment requests by
mail. Purchases paid with a
Government-wide commercial purchase
card are considered to be an electronic
transaction for purposes of this rule, and
therefore no additional electronic
invoice submission is required.
(b) The contracting officer may direct
the contractor to submit payment
requests by mail, through the United
States Postal Service, to the designated
agency office for:
(1) Awards made to foreign vendors
for work performed outside the United
States;
(2) Classified contracts or purchases
when electronic submission and
processing of payment requests could
compromise the safeguarding of
classified or privacy information;
(3) Contracts awarded by contracting
officers in the conduct of emergency
operations, such as responses to
national emergencies;
(4) Solicitations or contracts in which
the designated agency office is a VA
entity other than the VA Financial
Services Center in Austin, Texas; or
(5) Solicitations or contracts in which
the VA designated agency office does
not have electronic invoicing capability
as described above.
48 CFR Part 852
Government procurement; Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 12, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 48 CFR
chapter 8 as follows:
CHAPTER 8—DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Subchapter E—General Contracting
Requirements
PART 832—CONTRACT FINANCING
1. The authority citation for part 832
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR
1.301–1.304.
2. Add subpart 832.10 to read as
follows:
Subpart 832.10—Electronic Invoicing
Requirements
832.1001 General.
832.1002 Definitions.
832.1003 Electronic Payment Requests.
832.1003–1 Data Transmission.
832.1003–2 Contract Clause.
Subpart 832.10—Electronic Invoicing
Requirements
832.1001
General.
This subpart prescribes requirements
and procedures for submitting and
processing payment requests in
electronic form.
832.1002
Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
(a) Contract financing payment has
the meaning given in FAR 32.001.
(b) Designated agency office has the
meaning given in 5 CFR 1315.2(m).
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Electronic Payment Requests.
832.1003–1
Data Transmission.
The contractor shall submit electronic
payment requests through:
(a) VA’s Electronic Invoice
Presentment and Payment System (See
Web site at https://www.fsc.va.gov/
einvoice.asp.); or,
(b) A system that conforms to the X12
electronic data interchange (EDI)
formats established by the Accredited
Standards Center (ASC) chartered by the
American National Standards Institute
(ANSI). The X12 EDI Web site (https://
www.x12.org) includes additional
information on EDI 810 and 811
formats.
E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM
18APP1
23208
832.1003–2
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Contract Clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 852.273–76, Electronic
Submission of Payment Requests, in all
solicitations and contracts.
Subchapter H—Clauses and Forms
PART 852—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
3. The authority citation for part 852
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 8127, 8128, and
8151–8153; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR
1.301–1.304.
Subpart 852.2—Texts of Provisions
and Clauses
4. Add 852.273–76 to subpart 852.2 to
read as follows:
852.273–76 Electronic Submission of
Payment Requests.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
As prescribed in 832.1003–2, insert
the following clause:
(End of clause)
Electronic Submission of Payment Requests
(XXX 2012)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
(1) Contract financing payment has the
meaning given in FAR 32.001.
(2) Designated agency office has the
meaning given in 5 CFR 1315.2(m).
(3) Electronic form means an automated
system transmitting information
electronically according to the accepted
electronic data transmission methods and
formats identified in paragraph (c) of this
clause. Facsimile, email, and scanned
documents are not acceptable electronic
forms for submission of payment requests.
(4) Invoice payment has the meaning given
in FAR 32.001.
(5) Payment request means any request for
contract financing payment or invoice
payment submitted by the contractor under
this contract.
(b) Electronic Payment Requests. Except as
provided in paragraph (e) of this clause, the
contractor shall submit payment requests in
electronic form. Purchases paid with a
Government-wide commercial purchase card
are considered to be an electronic transaction
for purposes of this rule, and therefore no
additional electronic invoice submission is
required.
(c) Data Transmission. A contractor must
ensure that the data transmission method and
format are through one of the following:
(1) VA’s Electronic Invoice Presentment
and Payment System. (See Web site at http:
//www.fsc.va.gov/einvoice.asp.)
(2) Any system that conforms to the X12
electronic data interchange (EDI) formats
established by the Accredited Standards
Center (ASC) and chartered by the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI). The X12
EDI Web site (https://www.x12.org) includes
additional information on EDI 810 and 811
formats.
(d) Invoice requirements. Invoices shall
comply with FAR 32.905.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Apr 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
(e) Exceptions. If, based on one of the
circumstances below, the contracting officer
directs that payment requests be made by
mail, the contractor shall submit payment
requests by mail through the United States
Postal Service to the designated agency
office. Submission of payment requests by
mail may be required for:
(1) Awards made to foreign vendors for
work performed outside the United States;
(2) Classified contracts or purchases when
electronic submission and processing of
payment requests could compromise the
safeguarding of classified or privacy
information;
(3) Contracts awarded by contracting
officers in the conduct of emergency
operations, such as responses to national
emergencies;
(4) Solicitations or contracts in which the
designated agency office is a VA entity other
than the VA Financial Services Center in
Austin, Texas; or
(5) Solicitations or contracts in which the
VA designated agency office does not have
electronic invoicing capability as described
above.
[FR Doc. 2012–9269 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
49 CFR Parts 1108 and 1109
[STB Docket No. EP 699]
Assessment of Mediation and
Arbitration Procedures
Surface Transportation Board.
Supplemental Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Surface Transportation
Board has proposed regulations that
would require Class I and Class II rail
carriers to participate in the Board’s
arbitration program, unless they file a
prior written notice with the Board on
an annual basis opting out of the
program. By contrast, Class III rail
carriers wishing to participate in the
Board’s arbitration program could file a
request for arbitration with the Board
under this docket at any time, or could
voluntarily agree to participate in
arbitration on a case-by-case basis. A
shipper wishing to participate in the
Board’s arbitration program could so
inform the Board on a case-by-case basis
following the filing of a complaint.
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act and Office of Management and
Budget regulations, the Board now seeks
comments regarding certain information
pertaining to the proposed arbitration
rules.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DATES:
Comments are due by June 18,
2012.
Comments may be
submitted either via the Board’s e-filing
process or in the traditional paper
format. Any person using e-filing should
attach a document and otherwise
comply with the instructions at the
E–FILING link on the Board’s Web site,
at https://www.stb.dot.gov. Any person
submitting a filing in the traditional
paper format should send an original
and 10 copies to: Surface Transportation
Board, Attn: Docket No. EP 699, 395 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. Copies of written comments
received by the Board will be posted to
the Board’s Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov and will be available
for viewing and self-copying in the
Board’s Public Docket Room, Suite 131,
395 E Street SW., Washington, DC.
Copies of the comments will also be
available by contacting the Board’s
Chief Records Officer by telephone at
(202) 245–0236 or by mail at 395 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Virginia Strasser at (202) 245–0275.
(Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in Assessment
of Mediation and Arbitration
Procedures, EP 699 (STB served Mar.
28, 2012),1 the Surface Transportation
Board has proposed regulations that
would require Class I and Class II rail
carriers to participate in the Board’s
arbitration program, unless they file a
prior written notice with the Board on
an annual basis opting out of the
program. Pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
(PRA), and Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(3), the Board now seeks
comments regarding: (1) Whether the
particular collection of information
described below and in greater detail at
77 FR 19,591 is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Board, including whether the collection
has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the Board’s burden estimates; (3) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
ADDRESSES:
1 The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was
published in the Federal Register on April 2, 2012.
(77 FR 19,591).
E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM
18APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23204-23208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9269]
[[Page 23204]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
48 CFR Parts 832 and 852
RIN 2900-AN97
VA Acquisition Regulation: Electronic Submission of Payment
Requests
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
acquisition regulations to require contractors to submit payment
requests in electronic form in order to enhance customer service,
departmental productivity, and adoption of innovative information
technology, including the appropriate use of commercial best practices.
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before June 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026.
Comments should indicate they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-
AN97--VA Acquisition Regulation: Electronic Submission of Payment
Requests.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room
1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
(except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This
is not a toll free number.) In addition, during the comment period,
comments are available online through the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya Reid, Procurement Policy Service
(003A2A), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7178. (This is not a toll free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 2009, VA published a notice, in
the Federal Register at 74 FR 32223, of a class deviation to Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 32.905 (48 CFR 32.905), which added an
interim electronic invoicing clause in the VA Acquisition Regulation
(VAAR). The interim clause strongly encourages contractors to
voluntarily submit invoices electronically, which VA determined would
improve the accuracy and efficiency of payment processing. Under this
interim clause, contractors who choose to use electronic invoicing have
three options to submit payment requests in electronic form: (1)
Electronic Invoice Presentment and Payment System; (2) American
National Standards Institute (ANSI) X12 electronic data interchange
(EDI) formats; or (3) another electronic form as prescribed by the
contract administration office and the designated agency office. VA's
notice regarding interim, optional electronic invoicing noted VA
intended to initiate notice-and-comment rulemaking to amend the VAAR to
make electronic invoicing mandatory.
Mandatory electronic invoice submission is necessary to enhance
compliance and/or consistency with a long history of rules and
regulations governing the accuracy, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness
of the Federal Government's payment process.
In 1982, Congress enacted the Prompt Payment Act (``Act''), Public
Law 97-177, to require Federal agencies to pay their bills on a timely
basis, to pay interest penalties when payments are made late, and to
take discounts only when payments are made by the discount date. The
Act, as amended, is found at 31 U.S.C. Chapter 39. To implement the
Act, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Circular A-125
(``Prompt Payment '') in August 1982 (47 FR 37321). In response to
changes to the Act that Congress made in the Prompt Payment Act
Amendments of 1988, Public Law 100-496, OMB revised Circular A-125 in
December 1989 (54 FR 52700). On June 17, 1998, OMB requested public
comments on proposed revisions to Circular A-125 (63 FR 33000). The
Circular was updated to reflect the increased use of electronic
commerce in the Federal Government and in the private sector, including
electronic financial systems and electronic funds transfer. OMB
responded to the comments that were received on the proposed revisions,
issued final revisions to its Prompt Payment Circular, and codified
these revisions in new part 1315 of 5 CFR (64 FR 52580). With the
incorporation of the Prompt Payment rules into 5 CFR part 1315, OMB
rescinded Circular A-125.
The prompt payment rules at 5 CFR part 1315 address the increased
use of electronic commercial financial systems and promote the use of
government credit cards and accelerated payment methods. This proposed
rule enhances compliance with 5 CFR part 1315 by requiring the use of
electronic commerce. Electronic invoice submission replaces payment
delays from traditional postal delivery with immediate electronic
transmission of data. As a result, VA's ability to make timely
payments, reduce interest penalties on late payments, and increase the
dollar amount of discounts realized from prompt payment is improved.
FAR subpart 32.9 (48 CFR part 32.9) prescribes policies,
procedures, and clauses for implementing the prompt payment regulations
at 5 CFR part 1315. In relevant part, FAR 32.903 requires federal
agencies to establish policies and procedures necessary to implement
FAR subpart 32.9, and provides the agencies the latitude to prescribe
additional standards for establishing invoice payment due dates
necessary to support agency programs and foster prompt payment to
contractors as well as the latitude to adopt different payment
procedures in order to accommodate unique circumstances, provided that
such procedures are consistent with the policies in OMB's prompt
payment regulations. This proposed rule enhances compliance with FAR
32.903 by requiring electronic invoice submission. Electronic invoice
submission replaces payment delays from traditional postal delivery
with immediate electronic transmission of data. By eliminating delays
associated with traditional processing, electronic submission fosters
the prompt payment of invoices to contractors.
FAR 32.905(b)(1) defines the specific data elements that must be
included on a proper invoice. Electronic invoice submission ensures
invoice validity by employing automated data validation. Automated data
validation enforces data element accuracy and completeness. Invalid
invoices are immediately returned to the contractor for correction
without the delays associated with traditional postal delivery.
VA's proposed requirement for contractors to use electronic
invoicing when submitting payment requests supports several of the
principal purposes stated in section 2 of the E-Government Act of 2002,
Public Law 107-347, including promoting the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for
citizen participation in Government, improving the ability of the
Government to achieve agency missions and program performance goals,
reducing costs and burdens for businesses and other Government
entities, and transforming agency operations by utilizing, where
appropriate, best practices from public and private sector
organizations. Further, section 202(b)(3) of the E-Government Act of
2002 requires Federal agencies to develop performance measures that
demonstrate
[[Page 23205]]
how electronic government enables progress towards agency objectives,
strategic goals, and statutory mandates, and specifically directs
agencies to consider: (1) Customer service; (2) agency productivity;
and (3) the adoption of innovative information technology, including
the appropriate use of commercial best practices. VA anticipates that
this rulemaking requiring contractors to use electronic invoicing to
submit payment requests would reflect positively when rated against the
aforementioned performance measures given that it would ensure superior
customer service, increase agency productivity, and be consistent with
the longstanding best practice of electronic invoicing and direct
deposit in the commercial marketplace.
The Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, Public Law 107-300,
enacted on Nov. 26, 2002, as amended by the Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 (IPERA), Public Law 111-204,
enacted on July 22, 2010, requires Federal agencies to annually review
the programs it oversees and determine if those programs and activities
may be susceptible to significant erroneous payments. Section 2(h)(4)
of IPERA requires the head of each agency to conduct a financial
management improvement program, consistent with rules prescribed by the
Director of OMB. In conducting the program, the head of the agency
shall, as the first priority of the program, address problems that
contribute directly to agency improper payments and may seek to reduce
errors and waste in other agency programs and operations.
Executive Order 13520 of November 20, 2009 (``Reducing Improper
Payments'') directed the Federal Government to make every effort to
confirm that the right recipient is receiving the right payment for the
right reason at the right time. This proposed rule would address
problems that contribute to improper payments such as data entry
errors, manual processing errors, incorrect vendor selection, duplicate
payments, and payment delays while eliminating the waste associated
with traditional payment processing.
Other Federal Government departments and agencies have implemented
similar electronic invoice submission requirements. In January 2004,
the Department of Defense updated the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to reflect the new electronic invoicing
mandate. DFARS 252.232-7003 (48 CFR 252.232-7003) outlines the
electronic invoice submission process for contractor payments. In 2006,
the U.S. Government Accountability Office issued a report to
Congressional Committees entitled ``DoD Payments to Small Businesses:
Implementation and Effective Utilization of Electronic Invoicing Could
Further Reduce Late Payments'' (GAO-06-358). The report confirmed the
effectiveness of electronic invoicing in eliminating paper and
redundant data entry; improving data accuracy; reducing the number of
lost or misplaced documents; and ultimately, improving timely payments
to contractors.
The U.S. Department of the Interior issued a special notice
mandating electronic submittal of invoices and exchange of payment
information to its suppliers of goods and services beginning in May
2011. The U.S. Department of the Treasury mandated electronic invoicing
for its commercial vendors by the end of fiscal year 2012.
VA proposes to amend the VAAR by adding subpart 832.10 and clause
852.273-76 to implement mandatory electronic invoicing as part of its
strategic plan to improve the commercial vendor payment process. The
automated data validation, digital transmission, and expedited payment
and processing would reduce the errors inherent in a manual invoice
processing system, thereby reducing improper payments. Expedited
payment processes would allow VA to take advantage of prompt payment
discounts offered by its vendors thereby reducing the cost of goods and
services furnished VA while simultaneously reducing the cost to
contractors of manual invoice processing. As a result, VA would achieve
compliance and consistency with all applicable laws governing the
invoice payment process and use of information technologies.
This proposed amendment to the VAAR is anticipated to reduce the
errors in the processing of contractor payments by including automated
invoice data validation checks. VA's electronic invoicing system would
check the contractor-submitted invoice data against contract invoice
requirements and automatically refer improper or erroneous invoices
back to the contractor for immediate correction. This would facilitate
timely correction of administrative errors and timely payment of
contractors when coupled with the existing Electronic Funds Transfer
procedure (bank direct deposit) in use by VA. Automated invoice data
validation checks would reduce the manual processing burden and
consequent errors for both government and contractor personnel and
reduce the risk of improper payment. These same data validation
processes would ensure payment requests comply with applicable laws. In
addition, electronic invoicing would expedite the payment process, and
thereby, permit VA to take greater advantage of discounts afforded by
contractors for early payment. The proposed benefits of electronic
invoice submission to the contractor community would include speedier
payments of balances due, as well as reduced costs due to the
elimination of postage fees, and related material and supply expenses.
Currently, approximately 25 percent of the vendor community submits
electronic payment requests to the VA Financial Services Center using
one of two data transmission methods. Some contractors use VA's
Electronic Invoice Presentment and Payment System. Other contractors
use systems that rely on the standard EDI transaction sets. These
methods of data transmission are discussed in more detail below.
Under proposed VAAR 832.1003-1 and VAAR 852.273-76(c), electronic
invoices would be submitted by the Internet using either: (1) VA's
Electronic Invoice Presentation and Payment System, or (2) any system
that conforms to the X12 EDI formats established by the Accredited
Standards Center (ASC) and chartered by ANSI. These are the same
methods that many VA contractors are voluntarily using under VA's
current interim electronic invoicing clause. See 74 FR 32223. VA's
Electronic Invoice Presentation and Payment System allows invoice
submission through two methods. The first method is an internet-based
webform template that expands the ability of smaller contractors to
utilize electronic invoicing and allows a contractor to directly upload
invoice data that automatically populates VA payment systems. The
second method directly interfaces with the contractor's billing system
and transmits invoice data to VA payment systems. The U.S. ANSI X12 is
the predominant set of standards defining the structure, format, and
content of business transactions conducted through EDI. ANSI X12,
chartered more than 30 years ago, develops and maintains EDI standards.
Access to VA's Electronic Invoice Presentation and Payment System would
be provided to contractors at no cost.
As an alternative to using the VA Electronic Invoice Presentation
and Payment System, proposed VAAR 832.1003-1(b) and VAAR 852.273-
76(c)(2) would also permit contractors to submit electronic invoices
using any system that conforms to X12 EDI
[[Page 23206]]
formats established by ASC and chartered by ANSI. This would allow
contractors some flexibility in deciding how they want to communicate
with VA. For example, some contractors may already have a system
established that is compatible with above-mentioned EDI requirements in
order to communicate with other federal agencies. Those contractors
would be able to use that same system to submit electronic invoices to
VA. Additionally, purchases paid with a Government-wide commercial
purchase card are considered to be an electronic transaction for
purposes of this rule, and therefore no additional electronic invoice
submission is required.
In proposed VAAR 832.1003(b) and VAAR 852.273-76(e), VA proposes to
include five exceptions to the mandatory use of electronic invoicing by
contractors. VA proposes to allow contracting officers to require
contractors to submit payment requests by mail, through the United
States Postal Service, in the following circumstances. First,
contracting officers may direct that contractors submit invoicing by
mail for awards that are made to foreign vendors for work performed
outside the United States because foreign vendors may lack Internet
access, familiarity with, or ability to process an electronic invoice
with the standard commercial protocols and methods in the proposed
clause. Second, contracting officers may direct that contractors submit
invoicing by mail for classified contracts or purchases when electronic
submission and processing of payment requests could compromise the
safeguarding of classified or privacy information. In such cases, the
potential damage far outweighs any efficiencies or benefits to be
gained by electronic processing. Third, contracting officers may direct
that contractors submit invoicing by mail for contracts awarded by
contracting officers in the conduct of emergency operations, such as
responses to national emergencies because such contracts may be
performed in areas and under circumstances where Internet availability
and electronic invoicing are not practical. Fourth, contracting
officers may direct that contractors submit invoicing by mail for
contracts awarded by contracting officers for solicitations or
contracts in which the designated agency office (DAO) is a VA entity
other than the VA Financial Services Center in Austin, Texas. Fifth,
contracting officers may direct that contractors submit invoicing by
mail for solicitations or contracts awarded by contracting officers in
cases where the DAO does not have electronic invoicing capability as
described above.
Proposed VAAR 832.1003-2 would require a contracting officer to
insert the proposed contract clause, VAAR 852.273-76, Electronic
Submission of Payment Requests, in all solicitations and contracts. The
proposed VAAR 852.273-76 would require the electronic submission of
invoices for contracts unless the contracting officer determines that
one or more of the exceptions at VAAR 832.1003(b) applies. In cases
where an exception would apply, the contracting officer would provide
invoice mailing instructions to the contractor. The VA Financial
Services Center would serve as the DAO for commercial goods and
services purchased by VA, and would be the only entity which operates
the electronic invoicing capabilities as described above. Accordingly,
VAAR 832.1003(b)(4) allows an exception to the electronic invoice
requirement for solicitations or contracts in which the DAO is a VA
entity other than the VA Financial Services Center in Austin, Texas.
Public Comments
VA welcomes public comments on all aspects of the proposed rule,
however, the Department is specifically interested in feedback on the
following areas: (1) While VA's voluntary compliance program has been
in effect for 3 years, the VA is soliciting comment on whether a final
rule should include an appropriate phase-in period for electronic
reporting requirements; (2) The Department is seeking input on whether
the proposal would create any significant burdens or transition costs
for contractors; if so what types of costs or burdens might be
imposed?; (3) While VA generally believes that the rapid pace of
technological change has eliminated many challenges to full electronic
commerce and internet access for contractors e.g. both current and
potential federal government registrants are already required to
register in the Centralized Contractor Registry (CCR), the VA is
interested in comments on whether an exemption process should be
included in the final rule; and, (4) Finally, VA is seeking comment on
whether the elimination of the ``other electronic means'' option
previously available under VA's voluntary program would create any
undue burdens for contractors.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by OMB, as
``any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601-612. The Secretary acknowledges that this proposed rule could
affect some small entities; however, the economic impact is not
anticipated to be significant and is expected to be outweighed by the
positive economic impact of the proposed rule. Small entities should
realize a positive economic impact as a result of electronic invoice
submission due to the avoidance of traditional invoicing costs such as
postage and mailing supplies. VA's proposed data transmission methods
for electronic invoice submission would accommodate all existing
accounts receivable/billing systems that contractors are currently
using to submit electronic invoices to VA. As a result,
[[Page 23207]]
no additional hardware or software purchases by contractors are
necessary to submit electronic invoices. Additionally, the VA
electronic invoice payment and presentment system is provided to all
contractors free of charge. No negative economic impact has been
reported by small entities voluntarily using electronic invoice
submission in accordance with the existing interim electronic invoicing
clause in the VAAR. In 2006, the U.S. Government Accountability Office
issued a report to Congressional Committees entitled ``DoD Payments to
Small Businesses: Implementation and Effective Utilization of
Electronic Invoicing Could Further Reduce Late Payments'' (GAO-06-358).
The report confirmed the effectiveness of electronic invoicing in
eliminating paper and redundant data entry; improving data accuracy;
reducing the number of lost or misplaced documents; and ultimately,
improving timely payments to small businesses. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed rule is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose any additional information
collection requirements requiring approval of OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. Collections of information
referenced in VAAR Parts 832 and 852 have previously been approved in
accordance with OMB prompt payment regulations at 5 CFR Part 1315. See
64 FR 52580-01. Collections relating to the submission and payment of
invoices are approved under OMB Control Numbers 9000-0070 and 0102,
which govern the submission of adequate documentation to support
contractor requests for payment.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year. This
proposed rule would have no such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program
There is no Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number
and title for the program in this proposal.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on February 24, 2012, for publication.
List of Subjects
48 CFR Part 832
Government procurement.
48 CFR Part 852
Government procurement; Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 12, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of
Veterans Affairs proposes to amend 48 CFR chapter 8 as follows:
CHAPTER 8--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Subchapter E--General Contracting Requirements
PART 832--CONTRACT FINANCING
1. The authority citation for part 832 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
2. Add subpart 832.10 to read as follows:
Subpart 832.10--Electronic Invoicing Requirements
832.1001 General.
832.1002 Definitions.
832.1003 Electronic Payment Requests.
832.1003-1 Data Transmission.
832.1003-2 Contract Clause.
Subpart 832.10--Electronic Invoicing Requirements
832.1001 General.
This subpart prescribes requirements and procedures for submitting
and processing payment requests in electronic form.
832.1002 Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
(a) Contract financing payment has the meaning given in FAR 32.001.
(b) Designated agency office has the meaning given in 5 CFR
1315.2(m).
(c) Electronic form means an automated system transmitting
information electronically according to the accepted electronic data
transmission methods identified in VAAR 832.1003-1. Facsimile, email,
and scanned documents are not acceptable electronic forms for
submission of payment requests.
(d) Invoice payment has the meaning given in FAR 32.001.
(e) Payment request means any request for contract financing
payment or invoice payment submitted by a contractor under a contract.
832.1003 Electronic Payment Requests.
(a) The contractor shall submit payment requests in electronic form
unless directed by the contracting officer to submit payment requests
by mail. Purchases paid with a Government-wide commercial purchase card
are considered to be an electronic transaction for purposes of this
rule, and therefore no additional electronic invoice submission is
required.
(b) The contracting officer may direct the contractor to submit
payment requests by mail, through the United States Postal Service, to
the designated agency office for:
(1) Awards made to foreign vendors for work performed outside the
United States;
(2) Classified contracts or purchases when electronic submission
and processing of payment requests could compromise the safeguarding of
classified or privacy information;
(3) Contracts awarded by contracting officers in the conduct of
emergency operations, such as responses to national emergencies;
(4) Solicitations or contracts in which the designated agency
office is a VA entity other than the VA Financial Services Center in
Austin, Texas; or
(5) Solicitations or contracts in which the VA designated agency
office does not have electronic invoicing capability as described
above.
832.1003-1 Data Transmission.
The contractor shall submit electronic payment requests through:
(a) VA's Electronic Invoice Presentment and Payment System (See Web
site at https://www.fsc.va.gov/einvoice.asp.); or,
(b) A system that conforms to the X12 electronic data interchange
(EDI) formats established by the Accredited Standards Center (ASC)
chartered by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The X12
EDI Web site (https://www.x12.org) includes additional information on
EDI 810 and 811 formats.
[[Page 23208]]
832.1003-2 Contract Clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.273-76,
Electronic Submission of Payment Requests, in all solicitations and
contracts.
Subchapter H--Clauses and Forms
PART 852--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. The authority citation for part 852 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 8127, 8128, and 8151-8153; 40 U.S.C.
121(c) and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
Subpart 852.2--Texts of Provisions and Clauses
4. Add 852.273-76 to subpart 852.2 to read as follows:
852.273-76 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests.
As prescribed in 832.1003-2, insert the following clause:
Electronic Submission of Payment Requests (XXX 2012)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
(1) Contract financing payment has the meaning given in FAR
32.001.
(2) Designated agency office has the meaning given in 5 CFR
1315.2(m).
(3) Electronic form means an automated system transmitting
information electronically according to the accepted electronic data
transmission methods and formats identified in paragraph (c) of this
clause. Facsimile, email, and scanned documents are not acceptable
electronic forms for submission of payment requests.
(4) Invoice payment has the meaning given in FAR 32.001.
(5) Payment request means any request for contract financing
payment or invoice payment submitted by the contractor under this
contract.
(b) Electronic Payment Requests. Except as provided in paragraph
(e) of this clause, the contractor shall submit payment requests in
electronic form. Purchases paid with a Government-wide commercial
purchase card are considered to be an electronic transaction for
purposes of this rule, and therefore no additional electronic
invoice submission is required.
(c) Data Transmission. A contractor must ensure that the data
transmission method and format are through one of the following:
(1) VA's Electronic Invoice Presentment and Payment System. (See
Web site at https://www.fsc.va.gov/einvoice.asp.)
(2) Any system that conforms to the X12 electronic data
interchange (EDI) formats established by the Accredited Standards
Center (ASC) and chartered by the American National Standards
Institute (ANSI). The X12 EDI Web site (https://www.x12.org) includes
additional information on EDI 810 and 811 formats.
(d) Invoice requirements. Invoices shall comply with FAR 32.905.
(e) Exceptions. If, based on one of the circumstances below, the
contracting officer directs that payment requests be made by mail,
the contractor shall submit payment requests by mail through the
United States Postal Service to the designated agency office.
Submission of payment requests by mail may be required for:
(1) Awards made to foreign vendors for work performed outside
the United States;
(2) Classified contracts or purchases when electronic submission
and processing of payment requests could compromise the safeguarding
of classified or privacy information;
(3) Contracts awarded by contracting officers in the conduct of
emergency operations, such as responses to national emergencies;
(4) Solicitations or contracts in which the designated agency
office is a VA entity other than the VA Financial Services Center in
Austin, Texas; or
(5) Solicitations or contracts in which the VA designated agency
office does not have electronic invoicing capability as described
above.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2012-9269 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P