Safety Zone; 2012 Ocean City Air Show; Atlantic Ocean, Ocean City, MD, 22523-22525 [2012-9061]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
the human environment because it
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.465(a) to read as
follows:
§ 117.465
Lafourche Bayou.
(a) The draws of the following bridges
shall open on signal; except that, from
August 1 through May 31, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessels
Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from
2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m.:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 23, 2012.
Roy A. Nash,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–9074 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0189 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Christopher O’Neal,
Waterways Management Division Chief,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–668–5581, email
Christopher.A.ONeal@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0189]
RIN 1625–AA00
Submitting Comments
Safety Zone; 2012 Ocean City Air
Show; Atlantic Ocean, Ocean City, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean
in Ocean City, MD. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the 2012
Ocean City Air Show. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic
movement to protect mariners from the
hazards associated with air show events.
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2012–0189),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22523
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2012–0189’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2012–
0189’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM
16APP1
22524
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meeting, contact LCDR Chris
O’Neal at the telephone number or
email address indicated under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
Basis and Purpose
On June 8, 2012 through June 10,
2012, the Town of Ocean City will host
an air show event over the Atlantic
Ocean in Ocean City, MD. In recent
years, there have been unfortunate
instances of jets and planes crashing
during performances at air shows. Along
with a jet or plane crash, there is
typically a wide area of scattered debris
that also damages property and could
cause significant injury or death to
mariners observing the air shows. Due
to the need to protect mariners and the
public transiting the Atlantic Ocean
immediately below the air show from
hazards associated with the air show, a
Coast Guard established safety zone
bound by the following coordinates will
be enforced: 38°,21′,38″ N/075°,04′,04″
W, 38°,21′,27″ N/075°,03′,29″ W,
38°,19′,35″ N/075°,04′,19″ W, 38°,19′,45″
N/075°,04′,54″ W (NAD 1983). Access to
this area will be temporarily restricted
for public safety purposes.
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a safety zone on specified
waters of the Atlantic Ocean bounded
by the following coordinates: 38°,21′,38″
N/075°,04′,04″ W, 38°,21′,27″ N/
075°,03′,29″ W, 38°,19′,35″ N/
075°,04′,19″ W, 38°,19′,45″ N/
075°,04′,54″ W (NAD 1983), in the
vicinity of Talbot Street and 33rd Street
in Ocean City, MD. This safety zone is
proposed in the interest of public safety
during the 2012 Ocean City Air Show
and will be enforced from 10 a.m. until
4 p.m. on June 8, 2012, from 10 a.m.
until 4 p.m. on June 9, 2012, and 10 a.m.
until 4 p.m. on June 10, 2012. Access to
the safety zone will be restricted during
the specified date and times. Except for
vessels authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his Representative, no person or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
vessel may enter or remain in the safety
zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety
zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because: (i) The safety zone
will be in effect for a limited duration;
(ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii)
the Coast Guard will make notifications
via maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the zone will only be in
place for a limited duration and
maritime advisories will be issued
allowing the mariners to adjust their
plans accordingly.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in that portion of the Atlantic
Ocean from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June
8, 2012, from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on
June 9, 2012, and from 10 a.m. until
4 p.m. on June 10, 2012.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR
Christopher O’Neal, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector
Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone
757–668–5581, email
Christopher.A.Oneal@uscg.mil. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM
16APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Upon receipt
of consultation comments all
documentation will be made available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. This proposed rule involves
establishing a temporary safety zone.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0189 to read as
follows:
22525
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative
means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to
act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or
his designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
Number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be enforced from 10 a.m.
until 4 p.m. on June 8, 2012, from
10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 9, 2012, and
from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 10,
2012.
Dated: March 14, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012–9061 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
§ 165.T05–0189 Safety Zone; 2012 Ocean
City Air Show, Atlantic Ocean, Ocean City,
MD.
33 CFR Part 165
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: Specified waters of the
Captain of the Port Sector Hampton
Roads zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25–
10, in the vicinity of the Atlantic Ocean
in Virginia Beach, VA bound by the
following coordinates: 38°,21′,38″ N/
075°,04′,04″ W, 38°,21′,27″ N/
075°,03′,29″ W, 38°,19′,35″ N/
075°,04′,19″ W, 38°,19′,45″ N/
075°,04′,54″ W (NAD 1983), in the
vicinity of Ocean City, Maryland.
RIN 1625–AA00
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1000]
Safety Zone; Swim Events in the
Captain of the Port New York Zone;
Hudson River, East River, Upper New
York Bay, Lower New York Bay; New
York, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish seven temporary safety zones
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM
16APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 73 (Monday, April 16, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22523-22525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9061]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0189]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; 2012 Ocean City Air Show; Atlantic Ocean, Ocean
City, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean in Ocean City, MD. This action
is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters
during the 2012 Ocean City Air Show. This action is intended to
restrict vessel traffic movement to protect mariners from the hazards
associated with air show events.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0189 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Christopher O'Neal, Waterways Management Division
Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-5581, email
Christopher.A.ONeal@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0189), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2012-0189'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2012-0189'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
[[Page 22524]]
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact LCDR Chris O'Neal at the telephone number or email address
indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
Basis and Purpose
On June 8, 2012 through June 10, 2012, the Town of Ocean City will
host an air show event over the Atlantic Ocean in Ocean City, MD. In
recent years, there have been unfortunate instances of jets and planes
crashing during performances at air shows. Along with a jet or plane
crash, there is typically a wide area of scattered debris that also
damages property and could cause significant injury or death to
mariners observing the air shows. Due to the need to protect mariners
and the public transiting the Atlantic Ocean immediately below the air
show from hazards associated with the air show, a Coast Guard
established safety zone bound by the following coordinates will be
enforced: 38[deg],21',38'' N/075[deg],04',04'' W, 38[deg],21',27'' N/
075[deg],03',29'' W, 38[deg],19',35'' N/075[deg],04',19'' W,
38[deg],19',45'' N/075[deg],04',54'' W (NAD 1983). Access to this area
will be temporarily restricted for public safety purposes.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes establishing a safety zone on specified
waters of the Atlantic Ocean bounded by the following coordinates:
38[deg],21',38'' N/075[deg],04',04'' W, 38[deg],21',27'' N/
075[deg],03',29'' W, 38[deg],19',35'' N/075[deg],04',19'' W,
38[deg],19',45'' N/075[deg],04',54'' W (NAD 1983), in the vicinity of
Talbot Street and 33rd Street in Ocean City, MD. This safety zone is
proposed in the interest of public safety during the 2012 Ocean City
Air Show and will be enforced from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 8,
2012, from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 9, 2012, and 10 a.m. until 4
p.m. on June 10, 2012. Access to the safety zone will be restricted
during the specified date and times. Except for vessels authorized by
the Captain of the Port or his Representative, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the safety zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Although this
proposed regulation restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because: (i) The safety zone will be
in effect for a limited duration; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and
(iii) the Coast Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories
so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the zone will only be in place for a
limited duration and maritime advisories will be issued allowing the
mariners to adjust their plans accordingly.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in that portion of the Atlantic Ocean
from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 8, 2012, from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on
June 9, 2012, and from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 10, 2012.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LCDR Christopher O'Neal,
Waterways Management Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone 757-668-5581, email Christopher.A.Oneal@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with
[[Page 22525]]
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Upon receipt of
consultation comments all documentation will be made available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule involves
establishing a temporary safety zone. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0189 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0189 Safety Zone; 2012 Ocean City Air Show, Atlantic
Ocean, Ocean City, MD.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: Specified
waters of the Captain of the Port Sector Hampton Roads zone, as defined
in 33 CFR 3.25-10, in the vicinity of the Atlantic Ocean in Virginia
Beach, VA bound by the following coordinates: 38[deg],21',38'' N/
075[deg],04',04'' W, 38[deg],21',27'' N/075[deg],03',29'' W,
38[deg],19',35'' N/075[deg],04',19'' W, 38[deg],19',45'' N/
075[deg],04',54'' W (NAD 1983), in the vicinity of Ocean City,
Maryland.
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this part, Captain of the Port
Representative means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Hampton Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel
that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone Number (757) 668-5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This regulation will be enforced from 10
a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 8, 2012, from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 9,
2012, and from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on June 10, 2012.
Dated: March 14, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012-9061 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P